The present invention relates generally to a data storage arrangement.
Generally, automated cartridge systems (ACS) provide a mechanism by which multiple users in a data processing system can have common access to multiple data storage subsystems such as magnetic tape cartridge devices. In conventional tape systems, data files generated by remote user computer systems for storage on a particular tape cartridge include a predetermined expiration date in the file meta data which is used as a control mechanism by which a tape management subsystem can determine whether a particular space on a tape can be rewritten with new data. However, in conventional tape systems, expired data from a “scratched” tape volume is not actually deleted from the tape until a user actually writes new data to the tape. In other words, conventional tape systems conveniently provide a “safety net” for users who decide they still wish to be able to retrieve data from storage even though the data may be past the original expiration date.
Because conventional tape systems have proven to be quite inefficient in data storage space utilization, a virtual tape system has been developed which significantly improves storage space utilization and control by incorporating the advantages of an intermediate disk buffer as part of a tape emulation arrangement. Such an arrangement is taught in commonly owned copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/110,217 filed on Jul. 6, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,605, and incorporated by reference herein.
More specifically, in the referenced virtual tape system, a disk buffer is connected between remote users and the tape storage devices and arranged to appear to users as though it were a physical tape device. All data volumes are initially stored in the disk buffer, and subsequently written to a physical tape device using predetermined protocols which limit the occurrence of unusable dead spaces on the tapes while also improving the ability to reclaim any fragmented space which does occur. In such a virtual tape system, a user reads and writes only to the disk buffer, but believes they are reading and writing to an actual physical tape device.
While efficiency in space management and utilization are significantly improved with the virtual tape system, users also lose the above-noted safety net feature inherently provided by conventional tape systems. More specifically, to achieve higher efficiency, the virtual tape system operates to automatically reutilize any tape and disk buffer space occupied by expired data without user action, i.e., a user does not have exclusive monopoly of a particular tape like in a conventional tape system because the tape can be reused any time a new data volume is received into the disk buffer. Emulating the safety net feature in the virtual tape system would involve prohibiting the reuse of any tape space until a user reuses a corresponding virtual tape volume name for the data volume stored in the space irrespective of whether the corresponding data has expired.
However, such an arrangement reintroduces significant inefficiency in storage space utilization and reclamation, thereby defeating a main advantage of the virtual tape system. As a result, a need exists for an improved method of controlling reutilization of data space in a virtual tape system which can provide a safety net for users while also minimizing the impact of such a feature on efficiency of data storage space utilization and management.
Generally, conventional automated cartridge systems (ACS) allow multiple users in a data processing system common access to multiple data storage subsystems. However, due to the operational nature of the data storage subsystems, conventional ACS arrangements can only provide such common access via a serial access data control.
More specifically, whenever a user is performing a task which may require need of a storage/tape device, the user sends a request to a host computer control system. Upon receipt of such a request, the operating system must grab the storage device and allocate the device to the requesting user for the duration of the entire task irrespective of the amount of use actually made by the user.
Because such user monopolization denies allocation requests from other users while a resource is already allocated, storage device allocation and use in conventional ACS arrangements is highly inefficient. This in turn significantly lowers throughput capability of systems which may otherwise be capable of high speed processing.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved ACS and data storage device management method which does not require user monopolization of a storage device when allocating the device to a user.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an ACS and data storage device management method which provides an intermediary subsystem arranged to automatically emulate a storage device when allocated to a user, wherein the intermediary subsystem is arranged to allow multiple simultaneous user access/allocation of data storage capability.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a virtual ACS and data storage device management method which operates as a temporary storage device while giving the appearance of a conventional “physical” storage device in an ACS to a requesting user.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an ACS and data storage device management method which provides an intermediary subsystem arranged to automatically emulate a compatible storage device when allocated to a user, thereby allowing any type or format of physical storage to be used in conjunction with remote computer systems irrespective of compatibility.
In accordance with these and other objects, the present invention provides a virtual ACS and data storage device management method which incorporates a temporary data buffer arrangement between multiple user systems and any type of conventional physical data storage devices, wherein the temporary data buffer arrangement is arranged to emulate a physical data storage device when accessed by each of the user systems, while also allowing multiple users simultaneous access to read and write data to the temporary data buffer. The system includes a control processor arranged to periodically transfer any data in the temporary data buffer arrangement to one of the physical data storage devices.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a virtual automated cartridge system is provided including a data storage manager having a first input/output connected to at least one remote user computer system, and a second input/output connected to at least one physical data storage device, and an interim data storage device connected to the data storage manager and arranged to emulate a physical data storage with respect to storing or retrieving data for the at least one remote user computer system. The data storage manager includes a processor operative to assign a portion of the interim data storage device to a user computer system upon receipt of a user request for allocation of a data storage device for a duration of time.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for efficiently managing allocation of at least one physical data storage device in an automated cartridge system to competing remote user computer systems includes providing an interim data storage device which is arranged to emulate a physical data storage with respect to storing or retrieving data for a remote user computer system, and assigning a first portion of the interim data storage device in lieu of the at least one physical data storage device upon receiving a request from a remote user computer system for allocation of a data storage device for a duration of time.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
A virtual tape system 10 includes a virtual tape control system 12 having a suitable control processor (not shown) for routing all data volume files received from remote users to a disk buffer 14. Virtual tape control system 12 is arranged to transfer data from disk buffer 14 to one or more multiple volume cartridges (MVC) 16 as virtual tape volumes (VTV). A map matching the MVC location with corresponding VTV names and all corresponding file meta data is maintained by the virtual tape control system 12. An external tape management system (TMS) 18 provides overall management of the use of virtual tapes used by virtual tape system 10.
Users can selectively tag or encode any desired data volume file to indicate that the tape and/or disk buffer space occupied by the corresponding virtual volume can be automatically reused either immediately after the expiration date or a predetermined period of time after the expiration date. i.e., a data deletion “grace period.” Otherwise, if the user does not expressly designate a data volume file, virtual tape control system 12 will be prohibited from deleting and reusing the space of an expired virtual volume until a user reuses the VTV name for a new file of data.
This process is summarized in the flow charts of
The flowchart of
While described as requiring the user to designate whether the data can be automatically deleted to allow bypassing of the default policy of prohibiting such automatic deletion in the absence of a designation, it will be appreciated that the reverse arrangement could be implemented if desired. i.e., the default policy could allow immediate scratched data deletion if an appropriate designation was not made by the user.
As noted above, the present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/121,254 filed Jul. 23, 1998, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/110,217 filed Jul. 6, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,605, which is itself incorporated by reference in the present application. The relevant portions of that disclosure are reproduced verbatim below, with only the Figure numbers and reference numerals changed to avoid confusion with
Referring to
As further shown in
Overall operation of the virtual data storage management process of the present invention will now be described in connection with the flow chart of FIG. 5. More specifically, as denoted by decision block 200, processor 32 determines that a request has been received from a user seeking allocation of a physical storage subsystem. In response, processor 32 initially assigns at block 202 a portion of interim data buffer 42 for allocation to the requesting user. Upon set up, the allocated user will believe an actual physical storage subsystem device has been reserved, and will proceed to read and write data as indicated by the particular application currently being executed as indicated at block 204. As denoted by block 206, multiple users are queued and assigned different portions of interim data buffer 42. The assigned portions of interim data buffer 42 are arranged in accordance with known design principles to react like or emulate operation of a compatible data storage device, such as one of the actual physical data storage devices in subsystems 34-40.
Because the buffer is designed to emulate a storage device compatible with the user request as viewed by the remote user, compatibility between the remote user and the actual type or format of physical data storage device is not required. Thus, the present invention advantageously allows any type of physical storage device to be used or added as an upgrade to an existing system. The interim buffer management arrangement would be modified to include an appropriate translation arrangement to allow data to be transferred between the buffer and the actual type of storage device employed.
As denoted at block 208, all data of the virtual volume in the interim data buffer 42 associated with the file of interest is transferred to one of the storage subsystems in such situations as the end of a user's current allocation, a filling up of memory capability in buffer 42, or periodically as part of an overall housekeeping process.
In addition, after interim data has been transferred to one of the actual physical storage subsystems, such data can be later retrieved back into the interim buffer as a virtual volume when desired by the user. After retrieval, the storage manager 26 again causes the buffer to emulate the requested type of physical storage subsystem to make the retrieved data available to the user.
With such an arrangement, the present invention advantageously provides the illusion of a compatible tape or cartridge device, while further providing significantly improved data management flexibility and efficiency in data storage device use.
While the best mode for carrying out the invention has been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/121,254 filed Jul. 23, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,161, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/110,217 filed Jul. 6, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,605.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3130387 | Wright et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3292153 | Barton et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3699533 | Hunter | Oct 1972 | A |
3806888 | Brickman et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3909799 | Recks et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3928857 | Carter et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3936804 | Bachman | Feb 1976 | A |
3949377 | ONeill, Jr. | Apr 1976 | A |
3949379 | Ball | Apr 1976 | A |
3976977 | Porter et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4021782 | Hoerning | May 1977 | A |
4035778 | Ghanem | Jul 1977 | A |
4040026 | Gernelle | Aug 1977 | A |
4054951 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4077059 | Cordi et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4080651 | Cronshaw et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4080652 | Cronshaw et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4084228 | Dufond et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4084234 | Calle et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4086629 | Desyllas et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4091455 | Woods et al. | May 1978 | A |
4096567 | Millard et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4110823 | Cronshaw et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4123795 | Dean, Jr. et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4126894 | Cronshaw et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4158235 | Call et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4189770 | Gannon et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4215400 | Denko | Jul 1980 | A |
4228501 | Frissell | Oct 1980 | A |
4241420 | Fish et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4246637 | Brown et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4276595 | Brereton et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4298932 | Sams | Nov 1981 | A |
4310883 | Clifton et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4318184 | Millett et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4327408 | Frissell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4412285 | Neches et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4414644 | Tayler | Nov 1983 | A |
4467421 | White | Aug 1984 | A |
4533995 | Christian et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4792898 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5164909 | Leonhardt et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5228135 | Ikumi | Jul 1993 | A |
5247649 | Bandoh | Sep 1993 | A |
5287459 | Gneiwek | Feb 1994 | A |
5317728 | Tevis et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327535 | Ogata et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5359723 | Mathews et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369753 | Tipley | Nov 1994 | A |
5388260 | Monahan et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5455926 | Keele et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5548724 | Akizawa et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557768 | Braceras et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566315 | Milillo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5613155 | Baldiga et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623669 | Kincaid | Apr 1997 | A |
5742789 | Ofer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752268 | Shimizu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5805538 | Kamada et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805864 | Carlson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829046 | Tzelnic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5926649 | Ma et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926834 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953350 | Higgins | Sep 1999 | A |
5960451 | Voigt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6049848 | Yates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052765 | Blendermann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067587 | Miller et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094605 | Blendermann et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138221 | Korst et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151666 | Blendermann et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
RE36989 | White | Dec 2000 | E |
6269464 | Boussina et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289425 | Blendermann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298386 | Vahalia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317814 | Blendermann et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324497 | Yates et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330621 | Bakke et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6789161 | Blendermann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
892798 | Feb 1972 | CA |
1167762 | Oct 1966 | GB |
1359662 | Jul 1971 | GB |
1353770 | Sep 1971 | GB |
1496779 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1547381 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2 063 532 | Sep 1980 | GB |
51-18409 | Feb 1976 | JP |
52-106641 | Sep 1977 | JP |
53-22331 | Mar 1978 | JP |
53-84632 | Jul 1978 | JP |
53-98741 | Aug 1978 | JP |
108747 | Sep 1978 | JP |
55-153058 | Nov 1980 | JP |
55-164958 | Dec 1980 | JP |
4-48250 | Aug 1992 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030028718 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09121254 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 10255890 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09110217 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09121254 | US |