Data storage devices (DSDs) are often used with a host in a data storage system to record data on or to reproduce data from a recording media. As one type of DSD, a disk drive can include a rotating magnetic disk and a head actuated over the disk to magnetically write data to and read data from the disk. Such disks include a plurality of radially spaced, concentric tracks for recording data.
Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) has been introduced as a way of increasing the amount of data that can be stored in a given area on a disk by increasing the number of Tracks Per Inch (TPI). SMR increases TPI by using a relatively wide shingle write head to overlap tracks like roof shingles. The non-overlapping portion then serves as a narrow track that can be read by a narrower read head.
Although a higher number of TPI is ordinarily possible with SMR, the overlap in tracks can create a problem when writing data since new writes to a previously overlapped track affects data written in the overlapping track. For this reason, tracks are sequentially written to avoid affecting previously written data.
Managing sequentially written data for SMR media typically includes the DSD using an indirection system to translate between different addressing schemes to ensure that data is sequentially written. When data is modified for a particular Logical Block Address (LBA), the indirection system allows the DSD to sequentially write the modified data to a new location and remap the LBA for the data to the new location. The old version of the data at the previous location becomes obsolete or invalid data.
In order to free up space on the disk, a Garbage Collection (GC) process can be performed to make the portions of the disk storing invalid or obsolete data available for storing valid data. This can be accomplished during a GC process by relocating the valid data from a particular area on the disk and leaving invalid data to be overwritten. Other types of storage media using indirection, such as solid-state memory, may also use GC to free up portions of the memory storing invalid data.
The features and advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings. The drawings and the associated descriptions are provided to illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and not to limit the scope of what is claimed.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a full understanding of the present disclosure. It will be apparent, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art that the various embodiments disclosed may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and techniques have not been shown in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the various embodiments.
In the example embodiment of
Input device 102 can be a keyboard, scroll wheel, or pointing device allowing a user of system 100 to enter information and commands to system 100, or to allow a user to manipulate objects displayed on display device 104. In other embodiments, input device 102 and display device 104 can be combined into a single component, such as a touch-screen that displays objects and receives user input.
In the embodiment of
RAM 112 is a volatile memory of host 101 that interfaces with host bus 113 to provide information stored in RAM 112 to CPU 110 during execution of instructions in software programs such as device drivers 14 or Operating System (OS) 20. More specifically, CPU 110 first loads computer-executable instructions from DSD 106 into a region of RAM 112. CPU 110 can then execute the stored process instructions from RAM 112. Data such as data to be stored in DSDs 106, 107, 108, or 109, or data retrieved from DSDs 106, 107, 108 and 109 can also be stored in RAM 112 so that the data can be accessed by CPU 110 during execution of software programs to the extent that such software programs have a need to access and/or modify the data.
As shown in
In other embodiments, any one or more of GC manager 10, application 12, device drivers 14, file system 16, translation module 18, OS 20, or mapping table 28 can reside on DSDs 106, 107, 108, or 109. In one such example, GC manager 10 may reside at each of DSDs 106, 107, 108, and 109 so as to distribute execution of GC manager 10 throughout system 100.
Application 12 can include, for example, a program executed by host 101 that can request or modify user data stored in DSDs 107, 108, or 109, such as a data archiving program or multimedia program. Device drivers 14 provide software interfaces on host 101 for devices such as input device 102, display device 104, or DSDs 106, 107, 108, and 109. In addition, DSD 106 can store Operating System (OS) 20, which includes kernel 22, File System (FS) intercept 24, and storage stack 26. The contents of DSD 106 may be loaded into resident memory of host 101 (e.g., RAM 112) for execution and/or state tracking during operation of host 101.
File system (FS) 16 can be a file system implemented in a user space of host 101 with translation module 18 to interface with FS intercept 24, as described below in more detail with reference to the example implementation environment of
DSD 106 can also store mapping table 28, which can be used to translate or map between logical addresses (e.g., logical block addresses) used by host 101 to refer to data and corresponding physical addresses (e.g., physical block address) indicating the location of data in DSDs 106, 107, 108 or 109. As discussed in more detail below with reference to
As shown in
DSD 107 includes controller 124 which comprises circuitry such as one or more processors for executing instructions and can include a microcontroller, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), hard-wired logic, analog circuitry and/or a combination thereof. In one implementation, controller 124 can include a System on a Chip (SoC).
Host interface 128 is configured to interface DSD 107 with host 101 and may interface according to a standard such as, for example, PCI express (PCIe), Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA), or Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, host interface 128 can be included as part of controller 124.
Sensor 141 is also connected to controller 124. Sensor 141 may provide controller 124 with an input indicating an environmental condition such as a high temperature or high vibration condition of DSD 107.
In the example of
As appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, disk 138 may form part of a disk pack with additional disks radially aligned below disk 138. In addition, head 136 may form part of a head stack assembly including additional heads with each head arranged to read data from and write data to a corresponding surface of a disk in a disk pack.
Disk 138 includes a number of radial spaced, concentric tracks (not shown) for storing data on a surface of disk 138. The tracks on disk 138 may be grouped together into zones of tracks with each track divided into a number of sectors that are spaced circumferentially along the tracks. In the example of
Disk 138 may include one or more zones with overlapping tracks resulting from SMR to increase the amount of data that can be stored in a given area on a disk. As noted above, SMR tracks are generally sequentially written to avoid affecting previously written data and can involve using an indirection system to ensure that data is sequentially written. When data is modified for a particular Logical Block Address (LBA), the indirection system allows the DSD to sequentially write the modified data to a new location and remap the LBA for the data from the previous location to the new location.
In an SMR storage system in which indirection is used, GC can be used to recapture space used by data that is obsolete. However, performing GC and the relocation of data can decrease a performance bandwidth of system 100 that may otherwise be available to host 101.
In view of the foregoing, the present disclosure provides a tunable approach to improve control over GC and the relocation of data. According to another aspect, some embodiments of the present disclosure also include data management processes and systems to reduce the performance impact of relocating data.
In addition to disk 138, the NVM media of DSD 106 also includes solid-state memory 130 with blocks 131 for storing data. While the description herein refers to solid-state memory generally, it is understood that solid-state memory may comprise one or more of various types of memory devices such as flash integrated circuits, Chalcogenide RAM (C-RAM), Phase Change Memory (PC-RAM or PRAM), Programmable Metallization Cell RAM (PMC-RAM or PMCm), Ovonic Unified Memory (OUM), Resistance RAM (RRAM), NAND memory (e.g., Single-Level Cell (SLC) memory, Multi-Level Cell (MLC) memory, or any combination thereof), NOR memory, EEPROM, Ferroelectric Memory (FeRAM), Magnetoresistive RAM (MRAM), other discrete NVM chips, or any combination thereof.
Solid-state memory 130 may use an indirection system to allow for the mapping of LBAs to different physical locations as part of a wear leveling process for a more even usage of blocks 131. In one implementation, modified data is written to a new physical location in solid-state memory 130 and the LBA for the data is remapped from a previous physical location to the new physical location. As with SMR media, solid-state memory 130 can also employ a GC process to recapture space used by data that is obsolete or no longer valid. Solid-state memory 130 can include a source or destination portion in the GC and data relocation processes discussed below. In some embodiments, DSD 107 may include solid-state memory 130, rotating magnetic media including disk 138, and/or a combination of both types of non-volatile storage.
In
In operation, DSD 107 receives read and write commands from host 101 via host interface 128 for reading data from and writing data to the NVM media of DSD 107. In response to a write command from host 101, controller 124 may buffer the data to be written for the write command in volatile memory 139.
For data to be stored in solid-state memory 130, controller 124 receives data from host interface 128 and may buffer the data in volatile memory 139. In one implementation, the data is then encoded into charge values for charging cells in solid-state memory 130 to store the data.
In response to a read command for data stored in solid-state memory 130, controller 124 in one implementation reads current values for cells in solid-state memory 130 and decodes the current values into data that can be transferred to host 101. Such data may be buffered by controller 124 before transferring the data to host 101 via host interface 128.
For data to be written to disk 138, controller 124 can encode the buffered data into write signal 38 which is provided to head 136 for magnetically writing data to the surface of disk 138.
In response to a read command for data stored on disk 138, controller 124 positions head 136 via VCM control signal 36 to magnetically read the data stored on the surface of disk 138. Head 136 sends the read data as read signal 38 to controller 124 for decoding, and the data is buffered in volatile memory 139 for transferring to host 101.
Attributes that host 101 may define can include attributes of the data such as an expiration date for the data, a frequency of access of the data, ownership of the data, or a fragmentation level of the data. Host 101 may also define attributes that are conditions of a source portion that is garbage collected or conditions of a destination portion for storing valid data resulting from the GC operation.
For example, an attribute defined by host 101 may include a “data age” or expiration date used to determine whether certain data has expired. The data age or expiration date may be based on a data retention policy such as to remove all or substantially all files past a certain age or to remove files marked for deletion within a certain time period. In such an example, data may be grouped together by an expiration date so that data having the same expiration date are grouped together into one portion of system 100 (e.g., a particular logical volume, DSD, or portion of a DSD), so that the entire portion can be obsoleted at the same time without having to relocate much valid data.
In another example, host 101 may define an attribute based on a frequency of access of data (i.e., “hot/cold” attributes) so that data which is accessed less frequently (i.e., “cold data”) can be grouped together in a portion of system 100 or so that data that is accessed more frequently (i.e., “hot data”) is grouped together in a portion of system 100. More frequently accessed data often results in more data for GC than less frequently accessed data or data that needs to be relocated more frequently. Grouping frequently accessed data in one source portion can therefore ordinarily enhance the effect of a single GC operation since a single GC operation in a source portion of frequently accessed data would free up more space than multiple GC operations in source portions that do not contain as much invalid data. In other words, by grouping the more frequently accessed data together, it is ordinarily possible to precondition certain portions of system 100 for data relocation and thereby reduce an overall number of GC or data relocation operations.
In this regard, host 101 may also define an attribute to include considerations of a level of fragmentation in identifying a source portion for GC, such as an amount of capacity or performance that can be gained by performing GC in a particular source portion to provide the greatest capacity gain utilization.
Host 101 may also define an attribute for GC based on the ownership of data so that data owned by a particular user is grouped together in a portion of system 100. If the data of the user then needs to be deleted or relocated, the GC or relocation of that user's data is then more isolated to a particular portion of system 100 and can have less of an effect on system wide performance.
As noted above, host 101 executing GC manager 10 may also define an attribute based on a condition of a source or destination portion. Such conditions of the source or destination portions can include, for example, a reliability condition, an environmental condition, a wear level, an available data capacity, a distance from previous users of the data, a network bandwidth available between the source and destination portions, an availability of the source or destination portions, or an energy cost in operating the source or destination portions.
In one example, the attribute may include a reliability condition of the source portion or the destination portion such as a status of head 136 (e.g., a head that may need to be disabled) or a level of errors encountered when writing data on disk 138. In another example, the attribute defined by host 101 may identify source portions for garbage collection that have encountered a high level of errors so that data can be relocated to a destination portion with a lower level of errors.
In other examples, host 101 may define an attribute such that data is relocated from a source portion that has been utilized more often to a destination portion that has been utilized less (e.g., based on a wear level). This can ordinarily allow for a longer life for media such as solid-state media or can reduce the negative effects of repeatedly writing to the same location on disk media, as discussed in more detail below. Host 101 may also define an attribute based on an available data capacity so that data is relocated to a destination portion with a greater available data capacity.
In another example, host 101 may define an environmental condition such as a temperature or vibration condition such that data is relocated from a source portion experiencing a high temperature or high vibration condition to a destination portion experiencing a lower temperature or lower vibration condition.
The attribute or attributes may also take into consideration network considerations so that relocated data can be accessed quicker, the relocation of data is more efficient, or so that the data relocation has less of an impact on system performance. In one such example, host 101 defines the at least one attribute based on the location of previous users of data so that data is located to a closer physical location to the previous users of the data. Host 101 may also define an attribute so that there is a minimum network bandwidth between the source portion and the destination portion to improve the efficiency in relocating data in system 100.
The availability of the source or destination portions may also be considered. In such an example, host 101 may define an attribute based on an availability of the source or destination portions so that there is less activity or operations being performed at the source or destination portions.
In another implementation, an attribute may be defined by host 101 pertaining to a cost of operating the source and destination portions such that, for example, data is relocated from a source portion with a higher operating cost to a destination portion with a lower operating cost.
Returning to the process of
In block 306, a destination portion is identified based on the at least one attribute for storing data resulting from garbage collecting the source portion. In an embodiment where GC manager 10 identifies a destination portion, the destination portion may be a particular logical volume, DSD, or portion of a DSD in system 100. In an embodiment where a controller of a DSD identifies a destination portion, the destination portion can be a portion of the DSD such as zone 142 on disk 138.
In block 308, GC is performed in the source portion into the destination portion. As discussed above, GC can be performed by copying valid data from the source portion to the destination portion and freeing the invalid or obsolete areas in the source portion to be overwritten.
In block 310, the source portion is designated as a new destination portion for a new GC operation. By rotating the destination portion, it is ordinarily possible to reduce the likelihood of uneven wear on a particular portion of system 100 that is repeatedly used as a destination portion. Such rotation of the destination portion can also help mitigate problems associated with repeatedly writing in the same location on disk media such as Adjacent Track Interference (ATI) or Wide Area Track Erasure (WATER).
In block 312, data to be relocated and/or a destination portion are identified based on an attribute defined by host 101. As discussed above with reference to
In block 314, data is relocated from a source portion to the destination portion in accordance with the identification of data and/or the location of the destination portion in block 312. The source portion and the destination portion may be in the same DSD such as with zones 140 and 142 in
In block 316, it is determined whether a change was made in the source portion to relevant data while relocating data in block 314. Relevant data may include data that would have otherwise have been relocated in block 314. For example, changes to data in the source portion that were not identified for relocation in block 312 based on the at least one attribute would not be considered a change to relevant data. In some implementations, the changes can be determined based on comparing metadata from before and after relocating the data in block 314. The metadata may result from the use of a Copy On Write (COW)-based file system that generates a change in metadata when there is a change in a file. Scanning the metadata of the file system can then show whether changes took place and where.
If there was a change to relevant data in the source portion during relocation, the changed relevant data is relocated from the source portion to the destination portion in block 318 and the process ends in block 320.
The process of
In other embodiments, controller 124 or host 101 may repeatedly perform blocks 316 and 318 until there is no change made to relevant data. With each iteration of blocks 316 and 318, less changes are expected since the time for relocating data should decrease. The process can end once there are no further changes to relevant data in the source portion.
The user space includes GC manager 10, application 12, and recovery module 19 for reconstructing a file system after an error. Recovery module 19 can include a recovery tool similar to Check Disk (CKDSK) or File System Consistency Check (FSCK), but on a system-wide level to handle inconsistencies or errors identified across different file systems and/or DSDs of system 100. In addition, recovery module 19 may consult with GC manager 10 for determining source or destination portions when relocating data.
As shown in
In determining when or where to perform GC, the GC policies or attributes can include an expected Input Output (IO) usage for the DSD such that GC can be performed on a drive when it is expected to have less IO usage so as to have less of an impact on system performance. A history of IO usage may come from information provided by host 101 or from a DSD in system 100. In another example, host 101 may define an attribute based on an IO usage associated with a time of day so that GC takes place when it would have less of an impact on system performance.
The at least one attribute may also consider an availability of system resources (e.g., processing, storage, or bandwidth) which can include evaluating a level of activity of host 101 in system 100. In one example, the at least one attribute may specify a level of connection resources between the source portion and the destination portion so as to reduce a time for relocating data.
With reference to
In the embodiment shown, GC manager 10 sits above the file system layer and can query portions of system 100 to determine a time or portions for performing GC based on the at least one attribute. GC manager 10 may also include a lower level module that can execute the processes of
The kernel space can be part of OS 20 executed by host 101 and includes storage stack 26 for interfacing with and networking DSDs 106, 107, 108, and 109. FS 32 organizes data stored in system 100 by interfacing with storage stack 26. In addition, application 12 can use FS 32 to retrieve and store data in DSDs 106, 107, 108, and 109 as user data.
FS intercept 24 interfaces with application 12 and can intercept read and write commands and pass the commands to FS 16 in the user space. FS 16 can include a file system implementing COW such as Linear Tape File System (LTFS). As noted above, a COW-based file system can allow for a relatively quick identification of changes to relevant data during data relocation by scanning the metadata of the file system for changes.
For its part, FS 16 generates commands that include a block address indicating a logical address for metadata or data associated with the command. The commands are accepted by translation module 18 which can translate the logical address into a device address for a particular DSD and/or translate between different interface protocols (e.g., ATA, SCSI). The device address can also identify a location in a zone of storage media (e.g., zone 142 of DSD 107).
Translation module 18 passes the translated device address to storage stack 26 with the respective read or write command for the storage media. In practice, translation module 18 can be a plug-in driver without requiring modification to FS 16.
Other embodiments may include a different system implementation than the examples shown in
In block 604, a time for performing GC is determined. The time for GC can be determined so as to reduce the impact on system IO performance. Thus, host 101 or a DSD controller such as controller 124 may determine when to perform GC based on an availability of processing resources, an availability of the source portion or the destination portion, a time of day, or a level of activity of host 101. In this regard, GC can take place at a time when there is expected to be less activity in servicing other host commands so that the GC has less of an effect on the performance of system 100 in servicing host commands. For example, the time for GC can be at a time of day that has historically had less activity so that the GC does not interfere with the servicing of commands from host 101. The IO usage patterns can be either learned by a DSD controller or can be observed/provided by host 101. In addition, host 101 or a DSD controller may postpone GC for a source portion if modifications are being made to relevant data in the source portion.
In block 606, a source portion is identified based on the at least one attribute from a plurality of source portions for a GC operation. In an embodiment where GC manager 10 identifies a source portion, the source portion may be a particular logical volume, DSD, or portion of a DSD in system 100. In an embodiment where a controller of a DSD such as controller 124 of DSD 107 identifies a source portion, the source portion can be a portion of DSD 107 such as zone 140 on disk 138.
In block 608, a destination portion is identified based on the at least one attribute for storing data resulting from garbage collecting the source portion. In an embodiment where GC manager 10 identifies a destination portion, the destination portion may be a particular logical volume, DSD, or portion of a DSD in system 100. Thus the source and destination portions may be on the same volume/DSD/portion of a DSD or on different volumes/DSDs/portions of a DSD. In an embodiment where controller 124 of DSD 107 identifies a destination portion, the destination portion can be a portion of DSD 107 such as zone 142 on disk 138.
In block 610, GC is performed by identifying valid data in the source portion. Valid data is data that is a most recent version of the data that has not been obsoleted. In block 612, the valid data is copied into the destination portion and organized according to the at least one attribute. In one example, the valid data may be organized so that the copied data within the destination portion is organized by an expiration date, frequency of access, or ownership of the data.
In block 614, the source portion is designated as a new destination portion for a new GC operation. As noted above with reference to
In block 616, the destination portion is set as available for storing data after completion of GC. This allows for the destination portion to be used for storing user data in addition to the copied data from the above GC process. In future GC operations, the destination portion may then serve as a source portion for performing GC.
In block 618, a time for relocating data is determined. As noted above, the time for data relocation can be determined so as to reduce the impact on system 10 performance. Thus, host 101 or a DSD controller such as controller 124 may determine when to relocate data based on an availability of processing resources, an availability of the source portion or the destination portion, a time of day, or a level of activity of host 101. In this regard, data relocation can take place at a time when there is expected to be less activity in servicing other host commands so that the data relocation has less of an effect on the performance of system 100 in servicing host commands. For example, the time for data relocation can be at a time of day that has historically had less activity so that the data relocation does not interfere with the servicing of commands from host 101. The IO usage patterns can be either learned by a DSD controller or can be provided by host 101. In addition, host 101 or a DSD controller may postpone GC for a source portion if modifications are being made to relevant data in the source portion.
In block 620, data to be relocated and/or a destination portion are identified based on an attribute defined by host 101. As discussed above, the attribute can include an attribute of the data or a condition of system 100.
In block 622, data is relocated from a source portion to the destination portion in accordance with the identification of data and/or the location of the destination portion in block 620. The source portion and the destination portion may be in the same DSD such as with zones 140 and 142 in
In block 624, it is determined whether a change was made in the source portion to relevant data while relocating data in block 622. Relevant data can include data that would have otherwise have been relocated in block 622. For example, changes to data in the source portion to data that was not identified for relocation in block 620 based on the at least one attribute may not be considered a change to relevant data. In some implementations, the changes can be determined based on comparing metadata from before and after relocating the data. By not blocking changes in the source portion during the relocation of data, the performance of write commands to the source portion is not hindered by the relocation of data.
If there was no change made to relevant data during relocation in block 622, the process proceeds to block 632 to set the destination portion as available for storing data.
On the other hand, if there was a change to relevant data in the source portion during relocation in block 622, the changed relevant data is relocated from the source portion to the destination portion in block 626. As with block 622, the relocation of the changed relevant data does not prevent the performance of write commands in the source portion. Since the time to relocate any changed relevant data in block 626 is likely less than the time to initially relocate data in block 622, it is less likely that there are additional changes made to relevant data while relocating the changed relevant data in block 626.
Another check is performed in block 628 to determine if any changes were made to additional relevant data while relocating the changed relevant data in block 626. If so, the additional changed relevant data is relocated from the source portion to the destination portion in block 630 while blocking further changes to the source portion.
In other embodiments, there may be more iterations of blocks 624 and 626, or blocks 624 and 626 may be performed repeatedly until there are no changes made to relevant data in the source portion without blocking changes. This ordinarily allows for the IO performance of the source portion to remain generally unchanged during data relocation while maintaining coherency between the relevant data stored in the source and destination portions. With each iteration of blocks 624 and 626, less changes are expected since the time for relocating data should decrease.
In block 632, the destination portion is set as available for storing data. This allows for the destination portion to be used for storing user data in addition to the relocated data from the above data relocation process. In future data relocation operations, the destination portion may then serve as a source portion.
In block 634, a new destination portion is identified for the further relocation of data. The identification of the new destination portion can be based on the at least one attribute defined by host 101 without considering the previously used destination portion so that the destination portion rotates within system 100.
A single zone in
The shading of the volumes and the corresponding shading of the zones shows the mapping correspondence and the level of fragmentation for each of the volumes/zones. The darker shading of volumes/zones indicates a higher level of fragmentation for the volume/zone.
Zone N is a floating spare zone in
In other embodiments, a fewer number of zones may be mapped to a single logical volume. For example, a first pair of zones can be mapped to a first logical volume and a second pair of zones can be mapped to a second logical volume. In addition, other implementations can include GC of multiple zones into a single zone or GC of a single zone into multiple zones.
As with
In contrast to the implementation of
The grey shading indicates that the fragmentation level of the entire volume is an average of the fragmentation level of the corresponding zones. A GC process as in
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and processes described in connection with the examples disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. Furthermore, the foregoing processes can be embodied on a computer readable medium which causes a processor or computer to perform or execute certain functions.
To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, and modules have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Those of ordinary skill in the art may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure.
The various illustrative logical blocks, units, modules, and controllers described in connection with the examples disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
The activities of a method or process described in connection with the examples disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. The steps of the method or algorithm may also be performed in an alternate order from those provided in the examples. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable media, an optical media, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC).
The foregoing description of the disclosed example embodiments is provided to enable any person of ordinary skill in the art to make or use the embodiments in the present disclosure. Various modifications to these examples will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, and the principles disclosed herein may be applied to other examples without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive and the scope of the disclosure is, therefore, indicated by the following claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/932,113, filed on Jan. 27, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6018789 | Sokolov et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6065095 | Sokolov et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078452 | Kittilson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6081447 | Lofgren et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6092149 | Hicken et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6092150 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094707 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6105104 | Guttmann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111717 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6145052 | Howe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6175893 | D'Souza et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178056 | Cloke et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185063 | Cameron | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6191909 | Cloke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195218 | Guttmann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6205494 | Williams | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208477 | Cloke et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223303 | Billings et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6230233 | Lofgren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246346 | Cloke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249393 | Billings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256695 | Williams | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262857 | Hull et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263459 | Schibilla | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272694 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278568 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6279089 | Schibilla et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289484 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292912 | Cloke et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6310740 | Dunbar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317850 | Rothberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327106 | Rothberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337778 | Gagne | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6369969 | Christiansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384999 | Schibilla | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388833 | Golowka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405342 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408357 | Hanmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408406 | Parris | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411452 | Cloke | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411458 | Billings et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6412083 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415349 | Hull et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425128 | Krapf et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6441981 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442328 | Elliott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445524 | Nazarian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449767 | Krapf et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6470420 | Hospodor | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480020 | Jung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480349 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480932 | Vallis et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6483986 | Krapf | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487032 | Cloke et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490635 | Holmes | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493173 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499083 | Hamlin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6519104 | Cloke et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6525892 | Dunbar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6545830 | Briggs et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546489 | Frank, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6550021 | Dalphy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552880 | Dunbar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553457 | Wilkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6578106 | Price | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6580573 | Hull et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6594183 | Lofgren et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6600620 | Krounbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601137 | Castro et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603622 | Christiansen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6603625 | Hospodor et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6604220 | Lee | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606682 | Dang et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606714 | Thelin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606717 | Yu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611393 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615312 | Hamlin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6639748 | Christiansen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647481 | Luu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654193 | Thelin | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6657810 | Kupferman | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6661591 | Rothberg | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665772 | Hamlin | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6687073 | Kupferman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6687078 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6687850 | Rothberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690523 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690882 | Hanmann et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691198 | Hamlin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691213 | Luu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691255 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6693760 | Krounbi et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6694477 | Lee | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697914 | Hospodor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704153 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6708251 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710951 | Cloke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711628 | Thelin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711635 | Wang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711660 | Milne et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6715044 | Lofgren et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6724982 | Hamlin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6725329 | Ng et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6735650 | Rothberg | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6735693 | Hamlin | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6744772 | Eneboe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6745283 | Dang | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751402 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757481 | Nazarian et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6772281 | Hamlin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6781826 | Goldstone et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782449 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6791779 | Singh et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792486 | Hanan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6799274 | Hamlin | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6811427 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826003 | Subrahmanyam | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826614 | Hanmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6832041 | Boyle | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6832929 | Garrett et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6845405 | Thelin | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6845427 | Atai-Azimi | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850443 | Lofgren et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6851055 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6851063 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853731 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6854022 | Thelin | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6862660 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6880043 | Castro et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6882486 | Kupferman | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6884085 | Goldstone | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6888831 | Hospodor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892217 | Hanmann et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892249 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892313 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895455 | Rothberg | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895500 | Rothberg | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6898730 | Hanan | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6910099 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6928470 | Hamlin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6931439 | Hanmann et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934104 | Kupferman | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934713 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6940873 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6943978 | Lee | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6948165 | Luu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6950267 | Liu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6954733 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6961814 | Thelin et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965489 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965563 | Hospodor et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965966 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6967799 | Lee | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6968422 | Codilian et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6968450 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6973495 | Milne et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6973570 | Hamlin | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6976190 | Goldstone | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6983316 | Milne et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6986007 | Procyk et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6986154 | Price et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6995933 | Codilian et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6996501 | Rothberg | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6996669 | Dang et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7002926 | Eneboe et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003674 | Hamlin | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7006316 | Sargenti, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7009820 | Hogg | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7023639 | Kupferman | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7024491 | Hanmann et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7024549 | Luu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7024614 | Thelin et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7027716 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7028174 | Atai-Azimi et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7031902 | Catiller | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7046465 | Kupferman | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7046488 | Hogg | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7050252 | Vallis | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7054937 | Milne et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7055000 | Severtson | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7055167 | Masters | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7057836 | Kupferman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7062398 | Rothberg | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7075746 | Kupferman | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076604 | Thelin | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7082494 | Thelin et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7088538 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7088545 | Singh et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7092186 | Hogg | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7095577 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7099095 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7106537 | Bennett | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7106947 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7110202 | Vasquez | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7111116 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7114029 | Thelin | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7120737 | Thelin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120806 | Codilian et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7126776 | Warren, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7129763 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7133600 | Boyle | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7136244 | Rothberg | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7146094 | Boyle | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7149046 | Coker et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7150036 | Milne et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7155616 | Hamlin | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7171108 | Masters et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7171110 | Wilshire | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7194576 | Boyle | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7200698 | Rothberg | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7205805 | Bennett | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7206497 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7215496 | Kupferman et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7215771 | Hamlin | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7237054 | Cain et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7240161 | Boyle | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249365 | Price et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7263709 | Krapf | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7274639 | Codilian et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7274659 | Hospodor | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275116 | Hanmann et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7280302 | Masiewicz | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7292774 | Masters et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7292775 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7296284 | Price et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7302501 | Cain et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7302579 | Cain et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7318088 | Mann | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7319806 | Willner et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7325244 | Boyle et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7330323 | Singh et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7346790 | Klein | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7366641 | Masiewicz et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7369340 | Dang et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7369343 | Yeo et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7372650 | Kupferman | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7380147 | Sun | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7392340 | Dang et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7404013 | Masiewicz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7406545 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7415571 | Hanan | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7436610 | Thelin | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7437502 | Coker | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7440214 | Ell et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7443630 | Lengsfield, III et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7451344 | Rothberg | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7471483 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7471486 | Coker et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7486060 | Bennett | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7486460 | Tsuchinaga et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496493 | Stevens | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7518819 | Yu et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7526184 | Parkinen et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7539924 | Vasquez et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7543117 | Hanan | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7551383 | Kupferman | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7562282 | Rothberg | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7577973 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7596797 | Kapner, III et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7599139 | Bombet et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7619841 | Kupferman | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7620772 | Liikanen et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7647544 | Masiewicz | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7649704 | Bombet et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7653927 | Kapner, III et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7656603 | Feb 2010 | B1 | |
| 7656763 | Jin et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7657149 | Boyle | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672072 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7673075 | Masiewicz | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7688540 | Mei et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7724461 | McFadyen et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7725584 | Hanmann et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7730295 | Lee | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7760458 | Trinh | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7768776 | Szeremeta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7804657 | Hogg et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7813954 | Price et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7827320 | Stevens | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7839588 | Dang et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7843660 | Yeo | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7852596 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859782 | Lee | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7872822 | Rothberg | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7898756 | Wang | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7898762 | Guo et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7900037 | Fallone et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7907364 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7929234 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7933087 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7933090 | Jung et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7934030 | Sargenti, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7940491 | Szeremeta et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7944639 | Wang | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7945727 | Rothberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949564 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7974029 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7974039 | Xu et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7982993 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7984200 | Bombet et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7990648 | Wang | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7992179 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8004785 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8006027 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8014094 | Jin | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8014977 | Masiewicz et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8019914 | Vasquez et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8040625 | Boyle et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8078943 | Lee | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8079045 | Krapf et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8082433 | Fallone et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8085487 | Jung et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8089719 | Dakroub | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8090902 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8090906 | Blaha et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8091112 | Elliott et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8094396 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8094401 | Peng et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8116020 | Lee | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8116025 | Chan et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8134793 | Vasquez et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8134798 | Thelin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8139301 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8139310 | Hogg | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8144419 | Liu | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8145452 | Masiewicz et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8149528 | Suratman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8154812 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8159768 | Miyamura | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8161328 | Wilshire | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8164849 | Szeremeta et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8174780 | Tsai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8190575 | Ong et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8194338 | Zhang | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8194340 | Boyle et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8194341 | Boyle | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8201066 | Wang | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8271692 | Dinh et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8279550 | Hogg | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8281218 | Ybarra et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8285923 | Stevens | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8289656 | Huber | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8305705 | Roohr | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8307156 | Codilian et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8310775 | Boguslawski et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8315006 | Chahwan et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8316263 | Gough et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8320067 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8324974 | Bennett | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8332695 | Dalphy et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8341337 | Ong et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8350628 | Bennett | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8356184 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8370683 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8375225 | Ybarra | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8375274 | Bonke | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8380922 | DeForest et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8390948 | Hogg | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8390952 | Szeremeta | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8392689 | Lott | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8407393 | Yolar et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8413010 | Vasquez et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8417566 | Price et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8421663 | Bennett | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8422172 | Dakroub et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8427771 | Tsai | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8429343 | Tsai | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8433937 | Wheelock et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8433977 | Vasquez et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8458526 | Dalphy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8462466 | Huber | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467151 | Huber | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8489841 | Strecke et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8493679 | Boguslawski et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8498074 | Mobley et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8499198 | Messenger et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8512049 | Huber et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8514506 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8521972 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8527544 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8531791 | Reid et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8554741 | Malina | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8560759 | Boyle et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8565053 | Chung | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8576511 | Coker et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8578100 | Huynh et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8578242 | Burton et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8589773 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8593753 | Anderson | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8595432 | Vinson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8599510 | Fallone | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8601248 | Thorsted | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8611032 | Champion et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8612650 | Carrie et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8612706 | Madril et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8612798 | Tsai | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8619383 | Jung et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8621115 | Bombet et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8621133 | Boyle | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8626463 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8630052 | Jung et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8630056 | Ong | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8631188 | Heath et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8634158 | Chahwan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8635412 | Wilshire | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8640007 | Schulze | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8654619 | Cheng | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8661193 | Cobos et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8667248 | Neppalli | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8670205 | Malina et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8683295 | Syu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8683457 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8687306 | Coker et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8693133 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8694841 | Chung et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699159 | Malina | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699171 | Boyle | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699172 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699175 | Olds et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699185 | Teh et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8700850 | Lalouette | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8743502 | Bonke et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8749910 | Dang et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8751699 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8755141 | Dang | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8755143 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8756361 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8756382 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8769593 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8773802 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8780478 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8782334 | Boyle et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8793532 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8797669 | Burton | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8799977 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8819375 | Pruett et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8825976 | Jones | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8825977 | Syu et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 20020194210 | Subramoney et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20050069298 | Kasiraj et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071537 | New et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060232874 | Tsuchinaga et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070156794 | Kisley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223132 | Tsuchinaga | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20090113702 | Hogg | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129163 | Danilak | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100306551 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110225346 | Goss et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225347 | Goss | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110226729 | Hogg | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264843 | Haines | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283049 | Kang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302477 | Goss | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120159042 | Lott et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120275050 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281963 | Krapf et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120324980 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130067136 | Bates | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080689 | Jo | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117501 | Yun | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173854 | Shim | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130232308 | Yairi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130311741 | Tene et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140201424 | Chen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140281127 | Marcu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150301932 | Oh | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2015 from related PCT Serial No. PCT/US2015/012689, 13 pages. |
| Ji-Yong Shin, et al., Contention-Oblivious Disk Arrays for Cloud Storage, Cornell University* Microsoft Research* Google, Proceedings of the USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST), 2013, pp. 285-297. |
| Ji-Yong Shin, et al., A Contention-Oblivious Design for Cloud Storage, Cornell University, HotStorage Talk, Jun. 13, 2012, pp. 1-9. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150212938 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61932113 | Jan 2014 | US |