This invention relates generally to data storage systems, and more particularly to data storage systems having redundancy arrangements to protect against total system failure in the event of a failure in a component or subassembly of the storage system.
As is known in the art, large host computer systems require large capacity data storage systems. These large computer systems generally includes data processors which perform many operations on data introduced to the computer system through peripherals including the data storage system. The results of these operations are output to peripherals, including the storage system.
One type of data storage system is a magnetic disk storage system. Here a bank of disk drives and the computer system are coupled together through an interface. The interface includes CPU, or “front end”, directors (or controllers) and “back end” disk directors (or controllers). The interface operates the directors in such a way that they are transparent to the computer. That is, data is stored in, and retrieved from, the bank of disk drives in such a way that the computer system merely thinks it is operating with one large memory. One such system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,206,939, entitled “System and Method for Disk Mapping and Data Retrieval”, inventors Moshe Yanai, Natan Vishlitzky, Bruno Alterescu and Daniel Castel, issued Apr. 27, 1993, and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention.
As described in such U.S. Patent, the interface may also include, in addition to the CPU directors and disk directors, addressable cache memories. The cache memory is a semiconductor memory and is provided to rapidly store data from the computer system before storage in the disk drives, and, on the other hand, store data from the disk drives prior to being sent to the computer. The cache memory being a semiconductor memory, as distinguished from a magnetic memory as in the case of the disk drives, is much faster than the disk drives in reading and writing data.
The CPU directors, disk directors and cache memory are interconnected through a backplane printed circuit board. More particularly, disk directors are mounted on disk director printed circuit boards. CPU directors are mounted on CPU director printed circuit boards. And, cache memories are mounted on cache memory printed circuit boards. The disk director, CPU director and cache memory printed circuit boards plug into the backplane printed circuit board. In order to provide data integrity in case of a failure in a director, the backplane printed circuit board has a pair of buses. One set of the disk directors is connected to one bus and another set of the disk directors is connected to the other bus. Likewise, one set the CPU directors is connected to one bus and another set of the CPU directors is connected to the other bus. The cache memories are connected to both buses. Each one of the buses provides data, address and control information. Thus, the use of two buses provides a degree of redundancy to protect against a total system failure in the event that the directors, or disk drives connected to one bus fail and also increases the bandwidth of the system compared with a system which uses a single bus. One such dual bus system is shown in FIG. 1.
In operation, when the host computer wishes to store end-user (i.e., host computer) data at an address, the host computer issues a write request to one of the front-end directors to perform a write command. One of the front-end directors replies to the request and asks the host computer for the data. After the request has passed to the requesting one of the front-end directors, the director determines the size of the end-user data and reserves space in the cache memory to store the request. The front-end director then produces control signals on either one of the busses connected to such front-end director. The host computer then transfers the data to the front-end director. The front-end director then advises the host computer that the transfer is complete. The front-end director looks up in a Table, not shown, stored in the cache memory to determine which one of the rear-end directors is to handle this request. The Table maps the host computer address into an address in the bank of disk drives. The front-end director then puts a notification in a “mail box” (not shown and stored in the cache memory) for the rear-end director which is to handle the request, the amount of the data and the disk address for the data. Other rear-end directors poll the! cache memory when they are idle to check their “mail boxes”. If the polled “mail box” indicates a transfer is to be made, the rear-end director processes the request, addresses the disk drive in the bank, reads the data from the cache memory and writes it into the addresses of a disk drive in the bank. When end-user data previously stored in the bank of disk drives is to be read from the disk drive and returned to the host computer, the interface system operates in a reciprocal manner. The internal operation of the interface, (e.g. “mail-box polling”, event flags, data structures, device tables, queues, etc.) is controlled by interface state data which passes between the directors through the cache memory. Further, end-user data is transferred through the interface as a series of multi-word transfers, or bursts. Each word transfer in a multi-word transfer is here, for example, 64 bits. Here, an end-user data transfer is made up of, for example, 32 bursts. Each interface state word is a single word having, for example, 64 bits.
It is first noted that the end-user data and interface state data are transferred among the directors and the cache memory on the busses. The transfer of each word, whether a burst of end-user data or an interface state data passes through the interface in the same manner; i.e., requiring a fixed amount of overhead, i.e., bus arbitration, etc. Each one of the two busses must share its bandwidth with both end-user data and the interface state data. Therefore, the bandwidth of the system may not be totally allocated to end-user data transfer between the host computer and the bank of disk drives.
In accordance with the present invention, a data storage system is provided wherein end-user data is transferred between a host computer and a bank of disk drives through an interface. The interface includes a memory and a plurality of directors interconnected through an interface state data bus and a plurality of end-user data busses. At least one front-end one of the directors is in communication with the host computer and at least one rear-end one of the directors is in communication with the bank of disk drives. The interface state data bus section is in communication with: both the at least one front-end one and the at least one rear-end one of the directors; and to the memory. Each one of the plurality of end-user data buses has a first end coupled to a corresponding one of the plurality of directors and a second end coupled to the memory. The plurality of directors control the end-user data transfer between the host computer and the bank of disk drives through the memory in response to interface state data generated by the directors as such end-user data passes through the end-user data busses. The generated interface state data is transferred among the directors through the memory as such end-user data passes through the end-user bus.
With such an arrangement, the system bandwidth is increased because end-user data and interface state data are carried on separate bus systems within the interface.
For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is now made to the following description taken together in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring again to
An exemplary one of the cache memories 1200, 1201, here memory 1200 is shown in detail in FIG. 3. Such memory section 1200 includes a plurality of, here four random access memory (RAM) regions (i.e. RAM region A, RAM region B, RAM region C and RAM region D, as shown, and a matrix of rows and columns of control logic sections, here Application Specific Integrated circuits (ASICs), i.e, control logic section ASIC A,A . . . control logic section ASIC D,D. Each one of the four columns of control logic section ASICs is coupled to a corresponding one of the interface state data busses A, B, C, and D, respectively, as shown. More particularly, a first column of control logic sections (i.e., ASICs A,A; B,A; C,A and D,A) are coupled to the A bus. A second column of control logic sections (i.e., ASICs A,B; B,B; C,B and D,B) are coupled to the B bus. A third column of control logic sections (i.e., ASICs A,C; B,C; C,C and D,C) are coupled to the C bus. A fourth column of control logic sections (i.e., ASICs A,D; B,D; C,D and D,D) are coupled to the D bus.
Each one of the rows of the control logic sections ASIC A,A . . . ASIC D,D is coupled to a corresponding one of the four RAM regions, RAM region A . . . RAM region D, via a DATA/CHIP SELECT, as indicated. The first row of ASICs A,A; A,B; A,C; and A,D is coupled to the DATA/CHIP SELECT BUS of RAM region A. The second row of ASICs B,A; B,B; B,C; and B,D is coupled to the DATA/CHIP SELECT BUS of RAM region B. The third row of ASICs C,A; C,B; C,C; and C,D is coupled to the DATA/CHIP SELECT BUS of RAM region C. The fourth row of ASICs D,A; D,B; D,C; and D,D is coupled to the DATA/CHIP SELECT BUS of RAM region D. It should be noted that the control logic sections ASIC A,A . . . ASIC D,D in each of the four rows thereof are interconnected through an arbitration bus, not: shown, in a manner described in detail in copending patent application entitled “Bus Arbitration System”, Ser. No. 08/996,807, filed Dec. 23, 1997, inventors Christopher S. MacLellan and John K. Walton, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, the entire subject matter thereof being incorporated in this patent application.
Each one of the rows of the control logic sections ASIC A,A . . . ASIC D,D is coupled to a corresponding one of the four RAM regions, RAM region A . . . RAM region D, via an MEMORY ADDRESS/CONTROL BUS, as indicated. The first row of ASICs A,A; A,B; A,C; and A,D is coupled to the MEMORY ADDRESS/CONTROL BUS of RAM region A. The second row of ASICs B,A; B,B; B,C; and B,D is coupled to the MEMORY ADDRESS/MEMORY BUS of RAM region B. The third row of ASICs C,A; C,B; C,C; and C,D is coupled to the MEMORY ADDRESS/CONTROL BUS of RAM region C. The fourth row of ASICs D,A; D,B; D,C; and D,D is coupled to the MEMORY ADDRESS/CONTROL BUS of RAM region D.
The cache memory 1200 also includes a coupling node 130 adapted to couple any one of the ports P0-P7 to any one of four ports PA, PB, PC, and PD. Thus, the coupling node 130 adapted to couple any one of the ports P0-P7 to any one of the rows of DATA/CHIP SELECT BUSSES, i.e., any one of the ports P0-P7 to any one of the four memory regions, A, B, C or D, selectively in response to control signals produced by the ASICs A,A through D,D on a COUPLING NODE CONTROL BUS of each one of the ASICs A,A through D,D. It should be noted that the end-user data is selectively coupled through the coupling node 130 in accordance with routing information fed thereto by the ASICs A,A through D,D in a manner to be described.
The coupling node 130 includes a cross-bar switch section 132 having a plurality of, here two, cross-bar switches 132a, 132b. The coupling node 130 also includes a plurality of, here four, data selectors 134a through 134d. Each one of the cross-bar switches 132a, 132b is a 4×4 cross-bar switch controlled by control signals fed thereto by the ASICs A,A through D,D. Thus, each one of the crossbar switches 132a, 132b has four input/outputs (here coupled to ports P0-P3, P4-P7, respectively, as indicated and four output/inputs coupled to a corresponding one of a pair of input/outputs of the four data selectors 134a through 134d.
Each one of such control logic sections ASICs A,A-D,D is identical in construction, an exemplary one thereof, here control logic section ASIC A,A being shown in detail in
The routing information is fed to the ASICs A,A through D,D via the interface state data busses A, B, C, and D. Thus, for example, if a burst end-user data is to be transferred from director 1223 to memory region A of cache memory 1200, it is first noted that such director 1223 is connected to interface state data bus A and therefore the coupling node routing information is for such end-user data transfer is placed by director 1223 on interface state data bus A. Referring now also to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Other embodiments are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This is a divisional of Patent Application No. 09/223,519 filed Dec. 30, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,494.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4438494 | Budde et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4456987 | Wirsing | Jun 1984 | A |
4476526 | Dodd | Oct 1984 | A |
4480307 | Budde et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4484262 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4633387 | Hartnug | Dec 1986 | A |
4636946 | Hartung et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4636948 | Gdaniec et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4688168 | Gudatitis et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4780808 | Moreno et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4800483 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4977556 | Noguchi | Dec 1990 | A |
5115433 | Baran et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119485 | Ledbetter, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5166674 | Baum et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5206939 | Yanai et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5214768 | Martin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5241640 | Nisano et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5263145 | Brady et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269011 | Yanai et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274645 | Idleman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5335327 | Hisano et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5386511 | Murata et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5406607 | Marietta | Apr 1995 | A |
5459856 | Inoue | Oct 1995 | A |
5479611 | Oyama | Dec 1995 | A |
5539733 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551048 | Steely, Jr. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574865 | Hashemi | Nov 1996 | A |
5586264 | Belknap et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5603058 | Belknap et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5689728 | Sugimoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703875 | Burnett | Dec 1997 | A |
5742789 | Ofer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745790 | Oskouy | Apr 1998 | A |
5752256 | Fujii et al. | May 1998 | A |
5787265 | Leshem | Jul 1998 | A |
5799209 | Chatter | Aug 1998 | A |
5805821 | Saxena et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813024 | Saito | Sep 1998 | A |
5819054 | Ninomiya et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819104 | Tuccio | Oct 1998 | A |
5839906 | Leshem | Nov 1998 | A |
5890207 | Sne et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903911 | Gaskins | May 1999 | A |
5920893 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948062 | Tzelnic et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949982 | Frankeny et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6009481 | Mayer | Dec 1999 | A |
6038638 | Cadden et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038641 | Zangenehpour | Mar 2000 | A |
6055603 | Ofer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061274 | Thibault et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081860 | Bridges et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6125429 | Goodwin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134624 | Burns et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6178466 | Gilbertson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205536 | Yoshida | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230229 | Van Krevelen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240335 | Wehrung et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6275877 | Duda | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275953 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304903 | Ward | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317805 | Chilton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338095 | Yasuda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6378029 | Venkitakrishnan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389494 | Walton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397281 | MacLellan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418496 | Pawlowski et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6438586 | Hass et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470389 | Chung et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6529521 | MacArthur | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557140 | Kakuta et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563793 | Golden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6651130 | Thinault | Nov 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 510 821 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0 795 812 | Sep 1997 | EP |
2325541 | Nov 1998 | GB |
2360377 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2366424 | Mar 2002 | GB |
6337836 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7191930 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07244634 | Sep 1995 | JP |
07244634 | Sep 1995 | JP |
7-302171 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8172446 | Jul 1996 | JP |
WO 9301553 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9926150 | Oct 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020156976 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09223519 | Dec 1998 | US |
Child | 10120957 | US |