The present invention relates to improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.
The following patent publications are believed to represent the current state of the art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,465,387; 5,899,991; 6,338,082; 6,393,468; 6,928,439; 7,031,984; 7,068,592; 7,403,925; 7,421,740; 7,555,482, 7,606,801 and 7,743,420; and
U.S. Published Patent Application Nos.: 2003/0051026; 2004/0249847; 2005/0108206; 2005/0203881; 2005/0086529; 2006/0064313; 2006/0184530; 2006/0184459; 2007/0203872; 2007/0244899; 2008/0271157; 2009/0100058; 2009/0119298 and 2009/0265780.
The present invention provides improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the employing includes automatically applying specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes automatically recommending application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically recommending application to each of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is even further provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate metatags applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and automatically recommending application of metatags by the owner to the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method of operating a file system including maintaining a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements; applying the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and automatically synchronizing the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.
There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag application functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise and also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.
Preferably, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag recommendation functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.
Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is even further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to recommend application of metatags by each of the owners to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system of operating a file system including a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements, metatag application functionality operative to apply the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and synchronizing functionality operative to automatically synchronize the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The term “data identifier” is used throughout to refer to metadata associated with a data element. The data identifier may be a content-based data identifier or a non content-based data identifier. A content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes, for example, keywords or an abstract of the content of the data element. A non content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes characteristics associated with the data element such as, for example, file type, author, category and language. A non content-based-data identifier associated with a data element may also include one or more non content-based data identifiers associated with a parent folder of the data element. It is appreciated that the metadata may comprise predefined characteristics provided by the system which hosts the data elements or user-defined characteristics.
The term “metatag” is used throughout to refer to a metadata tag which is associated with a data element. Metatags are useful, for example, for automating data management tasks and for identifying data elements which may be grouped or categorized together for purposes of automatic or manual data management tasks.
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (406), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and validate the metatag automatically applied to the data element (408).
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (506), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and approve the recommendation to apply the at least one metatag to the data element (508).
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
As shown in
Metatag functionality 730 is preferably provided to utilize databases 724 and 726 to automatically apply metatags to data elements residing anywhere on network 704, as described hereinabove with regard to
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the invention also includes various combinations and subcombinations of the features described hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing and which are not in the prior art.
Reference is made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/348,829, filed May 27, 2010 and entitled “DATA MANAGEMENT USING DATA TAGGING”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (4) and (5)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/014,762, filed Jan. 27, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,023, filed May 12, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to the following patents and patent applications, owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,555,482 and 7,606,801; U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. 2007/0244899, 2008/0271157, 2009/0100058, 2009/0119298; 2009/0265780; 2011/0060916 and 2011/0061111; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2011/000409 | 5/26/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/20/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/148377 | 12/1/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5465387 | Mukherjee | Nov 1995 | A |
5761669 | Montague et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5889952 | Hunnicutt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899991 | Karch | May 1999 | A |
6308173 | Glasser et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338082 | Schneider | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6393468 | McGee | May 2002 | B1 |
6772350 | Belani et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6928439 | Satoh | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7007032 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7017183 | Frey et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031984 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068592 | Duvaut et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7401087 | Copperman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403925 | Schlesinger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421740 | Fey et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7555482 | Korkus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568230 | Lieberman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606801 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7716240 | Lim | May 2010 | B2 |
7720858 | Dettinger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743420 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7797335 | Stern et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797337 | Fry | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801894 | Bone | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7844582 | Arbilla | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7882098 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890530 | Bilger et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8171050 | O'Halloran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8250048 | Yalamanchi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8285748 | Thoms et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306999 | Gass et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8417678 | Bone | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438124 | Spivack et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8463815 | Zoellner | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8521766 | Hoarty | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8612404 | Bone et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626803 | Hsu | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8799225 | Vaitzblit et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020002557 | Straube et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030188198 | Holdsworth et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040030915 | Sameshima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040186809 | Schlesinger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040249847 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254919 | Giuseppini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050044399 | Dorey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065823 | Ramraj et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086268 | Rogers | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086529 | Buchsbaum | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108206 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120054 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172126 | Lange et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203881 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246762 | Girouard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278334 | Fey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278785 | Lieberman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060064313 | Steinbarth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075503 | Bunker, V et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090208 | Smith | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060184459 | Parida | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184530 | Song et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060271523 | Brookler et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277184 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294578 | Burke et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033340 | Tulskie et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050366 | Bugir et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073698 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094265 | Korkus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101387 | Hua et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112743 | Giampaolo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156659 | Lim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156693 | Soin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198608 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203872 | Flinn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214497 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244899 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261121 | Jacobson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266006 | Buss | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276823 | Borden et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282855 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080031447 | Geshwind et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034402 | Botz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080162707 | Beck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172720 | Botz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201348 | Edmonds | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080270462 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271157 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090037558 | Stone et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077124 | Spivack et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100058 | Faitelson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119298 | Faitelson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150981 | Amies et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163183 | O'Donoghue et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198892 | Alvarez | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249446 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265780 | Korkus et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292930 | Marano et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320088 | Gill et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037324 | Grant et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057815 | Spivack et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070881 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100114977 | Bacher | May 2010 | A1 |
20100185650 | Topatan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100299763 | Marcus et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110040793 | Davidson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060916 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061093 | Korkus et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061111 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184989 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219028 | Dove | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247074 | Manring et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296490 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120054283 | Korkus et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173583 | Faiteson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120271853 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271855 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291100 | Faitelson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1588889 | Mar 2005 | CN |
101226537 | Jul 2008 | CN |
1 248 178 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2011030324 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011148364 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148375 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148376 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148377 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012101620 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012143920 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/688,486, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/673,691, filed Feb. 16, 2010. |
Findutils; GNU Project-Free Software Foundation (FSF), 3 pages, Nov. 2006. |
S.R. Kleiman; “Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX”, USENIX Association, Summer Conference Proceeding, Atlanta 1986, 10 pages. |
GENUNIX; Writing Filesystems VFS and Vnode Interfaces, 5 pages, Oct. 2007. |
Sahadeb DE, et al; “Secure Access Control in a Multi-user Geodatabase”, available on the Internet at URL http://www10.giscafe.com 2005. |
Sara C. Madeira; “Clustering, Fuzzy Clustering and Biclustering: An Overview”, pp. 31 to 53, Jun. 27, 2003. |
Sara C. Madeira, et al; “Biclustering Algorithms for Biological Data Analysis: A Survey”, IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 1, No. 1, Jan.-Mar. 2004, 22 pages; http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr05/cos598E/bib/bicluster.pdf. |
Federico Stagni; “On Usage Control for Data Grids: Models, Architectures, and Specifications”, Mar. 18, 2009; Thesis (PhD Thesis), 177 pages, [Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011]. |
Tamas Suto; “Augmenting the Core Functionality of an e-Science Grid Multi-Tier Front-End: GridSphere-based Reengineering of EPIC”, 208 pages, Submitted to Imperial College London in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering, 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011]. |
Edgar Weippl, et al; “Content-based Management of Document Access Control”, 14th International Conference on Applications of Prolog (INAP), 2001, 9 pages. |
Alex Woodie; “Varonis Prevents Unauthorized Access to Unstructured Data”, 3 pages; Four Hundred Stuff, Published Jul. 31, 2007. |
Varonis; A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007, 1 page. |
Varonis, A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007. |
Varonis; “The business Case for Data Governance”, dated Mar. 27, 2007, 8 pages. |
Varonis; “Accelerating Audits with Automation: Understanding Who's Accessing Your Unstructured Data”, Oct. 8, 2007, 7 pages; Copyright 2007 by Varonis Systems. |
Varonis; Entitlement Reviews: A Practitioner's Guide, 16 pages, Copyright 2007 by Varonis Systems. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 1.0, Aug. 30, 2005, 71 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.0, Aug. 24, 2006, 118 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.5, Nov. 27, 2006, 124 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.6, Dec. 15, 2006, 127 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007, 131 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007, 153 pages. |
German Office Action, dated Sep. 14, 2012, German Appln. No. 11 2006 001 378.5. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Feb. 12, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
USPTO FOA mailed Aug. 1, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Oct. 31, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,736. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Dec. 14, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Jul. 9, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
USPTO FOA mailed Dec. 14, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
USPTO NOA mailed Apr. 12, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
USPTO NFOA dated Sep. 16, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
USPTO FOA dated Apr. 28, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
USPTO NFOA dated Jul. 10, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059. |
USPTO FOA dated Dec. 24, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059. |
USPTO NFOA dated Sep. 14, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,967. |
USPTO NFOA dated Jul. 11, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/014,762. |
USPTO RR dated Nov. 21, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,023. |
USPTO NFOA dated Jan. 15, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/159,903. |
USPTO NFOA dated Sep. 19, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,826. |
IPRP dated Nov. 27, 2012, PCT/IL2011/000076. |
IPRP dated Nov. 27, 2012, PCT/IL2011/000407. |
IPRP dated Nov. 27, 2012, PCT/IL2011/000409. |
ISR dated May 23, 2011; PCT/IL11/00065. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated May 20, 2010; PCT/IL10/00069. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Jun. 14, 2011 PCT/IL11/00066. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Jun. 13, 2011 PCT/IL11/00076. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated May 24, 2011, PCT/IL11/00077. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Nov. 2, 2011; PCT/IL11/00407. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Nov. 15, 2011; PCT/IL11/00408. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2011; PCT/IL11/00409. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2012; PCT/IL11/00902. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2012; PCT/IL2012/000163. |
USPTO FOA dated Jul. 2, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,748. |
First Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2015; Appln. No. 2011800361521. |
An Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
Third Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2016; Appln. No. 2011800381521. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120191646 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61348829 | May 2010 | US |