Data tagging

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11138153
  • Patent Number
    11,138,153
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 15, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2021
    3 years ago
  • CPC
    • G06F16/164
    • G06F16/907
    • G06F16/2457
    • G06F16/36
    • G06F16/93
    • G06F16/9535
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 707 783000
    • 707 781000
    • 707 737000
    • 707 784000
    • 707 785000
    • 707 776000
    • CPC
    • G06F21/6218
    • G06F21/604
    • G06F16/93
    • G06F16/36
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06F16/13
    • G06F16/122
    • G06F16/168
    • G06F16/176
    • G06F16/48
  • International Classifications
    • G06F16/16
    • G06F16/907
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06F16/36
    • G06F16/2457
    • G06F16/93
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      270
Abstract
A method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The following patent publications are believed to represent the current state of the art:


U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,465,387; 5,899,991; 6,338,082; 6,393,468; 6,928,439; 7,031,984; 7,068,592; 7,403,925; 7,421,740; 7,555,482, 7,606,801 and 7,743,420; and


U.S. Published Patent Application Nos.: 2003/0051026; 2004/0249847; 2005/0108206; 2005/0203881; 2005/0086529; 2006/0064313; 2006/0184530; 2006/0184459; 2007/0203872; 2007/0244899; 2008/0271157; 2009/0100058; 2009/0119298 and 2009/0265780.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.


There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the employing includes automatically applying specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.


Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


There is also provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the employing includes automatically recommending application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically recommending application to each of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.


There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.


There is even further provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate metatags applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.


There is also provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and automatically recommending application of metatags by the owner to the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.


There is further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method of operating a file system including maintaining a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements; applying the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and automatically synchronizing the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.


There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag application functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.


Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise and also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.


Preferably, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag recommendation functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.


Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.


There is even further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.


There is also provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.


There is yet further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to recommend application of metatags by each of the owners to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.


There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system of operating a file system including a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements, metatag application functionality operative to apply the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and synchronizing functionality operative to automatically synchronize the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram illustration of the automatic data tagging system whose functionality is illustrated in FIGS. 1-6.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Reference is now made to FIG. 1, which is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 1 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 1 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements, and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. The operation of the automatic data tagging system also preferably includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


The term “data identifier” is used throughout to refer to metadata associated with a data element. The data identifier may be a content-based data identifier or a non content-based data identifier. A content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes, for example, keywords or an abstract of the content of the data element. A non content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes characteristics associated with the data element such as, for example, file type, author, category and language. A non content-based data identifier associated with a data element may also include one or more non content-based data identifiers associated with a parent folder of the data element. It is appreciated that the metadata may comprise predefined characteristics provided by the system which hosts the data elements or user-defined characteristics.


The term “metatag” is used throughout to refer to a metadata tag which is associated with a data element. Metatags are useful, for example, for automating data management tasks and for identifying data elements which may be grouped or categorized together for purposes of automatic or manual data management tasks.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 1 typically resides on an a server 100 that is connected to an enterprise computer network 102 which preferably includes multiple disparate clients 104, servers. 106 and data storage resources 108. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers 106 and on data storage resources 108 and are accessible to users of the network 102 in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 1, an IT Administrator of enterprise network 102 decides to utilize the automatic data tagging system residing on server 100 to automatically tag a subset of files which files have access permissions to the ‘Everyone’ group and contain the term ‘confidential’ as being vulnerable files. The Administrator then decides to send a list of the vulnerable files to their respective owners for access permissions remediation. In the example of FIG. 1 access permissions remediation may include, for example, modification of the access permissions of the file to include access permissions only to trusted individuals who require ongoing access to the file.


Reference is now made to FIG. 2, which is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 2 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 2 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements, and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. The operation of the automatic data tagging system also preferably includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements, and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 2 typically resides on an a server 200 that is connected to an enterprise computer network 202 which preferably includes multiple disparate clients 204, servers 206 and data storage resources 208. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers 206 and on data storage resources 208 and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 2, an IT Administrator of enterprise network 202 decides to utilize the automatic data tagging system residing on server 200 to automatically tag a subset of files which files are owned by Dave, the company attorney, as being ‘legal’ files. The Administrator then decides to send a list of the legal files to Dave, requesting Dave to ascertain and confirm that the files tagged as ‘legal’ are actually legal-related files. As seen in FIG. 2, Dave ascertains and confirms that the file Contract1.doc and Agreement2.doc are actually legal-related files, while Resume5.doc is not legal-related, and therefore should not be tagged as ‘legal’.


Reference is now made to FIG. 3, which is a simplified pictorial illustration of an example of the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 3 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 3 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements, and requiring the owner to apply metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 3 typically resides on an a server 300 that is connected to an enterprise computer network 302 which preferably includes multiple disparate clients 304, servers 306 and data storage resources 308. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers 306 and on data storage resources and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 3, an IT Administrator of enterprise network 302 decides to request from all owners of a subset of files to manually tag the files. The Administrator utilizes the system residing on server 300 to automatically ascertain the owners of the files and to send a request to each owner to tag their respectively owned files. As seen in FIG. 3, upon receiving the request, each file owner tags their respectively owned files.


Reference is now made to FIG. 4, which is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 4 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 4 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements, and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. The operation of the automatic data tagging system also preferably includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements, and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 4 typically resides on a server that is connected to an enterprise computer network which preferably includes multiple disparate clients, servers and data storage resources. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers and on data storage resources and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 4, the system preferably continuously maintains a database of access metrics which include actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise (400). The system also preferably continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements (402). Preferably, the system utilizes the database of stored access metrics and the database of metadata to automatically apply a metatag to each of the subset of data elements (404). Alternatively, the system may automatically apply the metatag assigned to the parent folder of each of the subset of data elements to the data element.


Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (406), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and validate the metatag automatically applied to the data element (408).


Reference is now made to FIG. 5, which is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 5 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 5 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements, and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements. Preferably, the recommending of application of metatags to the plurality of data elements includes automatically recommending application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of said plurality of data elements.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 5 typically resides on a server that is connected to an enterprise computer network which preferably includes multiple disparate clients, servers and data storage resources. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers and on data storage resources and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 5, the system preferably continuously maintains a database of access metrics which include actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise (500). The system also preferably continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements (502). Preferably, the system utilizes the database of stored access metrics and the database of metadata to recommend applying at least one metatag to each of the subset of data elements (504).


Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (506), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and approve the recommendation to apply the at least one metatag to the data element (508).


Reference is now made to FIG. 6, which is a simplified flowchart indicating steps in the operation of an automatic data tagging system constructed and operative in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 6 is preferably suitable for operating in an enterprise computer network including multiple disparate clients, data elements, computer hardware resources and computer software resources.


The operation of the automatic data tagging system of FIG. 6 preferably includes characterizing data elements in an enterprise by ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements, and requiring the owner to apply metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.


The automatic data tagging system of FIG. 6 typically resides on a server that is connected to an enterprise computer network which preferably includes multiple disparate clients, servers and data storage resources. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers and on data storage resources and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.


Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.


As shown in FIG. 6, the system preferably continuously maintains a database of access metrics which include actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise (600). Preferably, the system utilizes the database of access metrics to ascertain an owner for each of the data elements (602), and requires the owner of each of the data elements to apply at least one metatag to each of the data elements of which he is the owner (604).


Reference is now made to FIG. 7, which is a simplified block diagram illustration of the automatic data tagging system whose functionality is illustrated in FIGS. 1-6. The automatic data tagging system 700 typically resides on an a server 702 that is connected to an enterprise computer network 704 which preferably includes multiple disparate clients 706, servers 708 and data storage resources 710. Typically, data elements, such as computer files, reside on servers 708 and on data storage resources 710 and are accessible to users of the network in accordance with access permissions defined by an owner of each data element or each data element folder. It is appreciated that the data elements may reside on any suitable data storage system or platform, such as a file system or a data collaboration system, which may reside on any suitable computer operating system or infrastructure.


As shown in FIG. 7, the automatic data tagging system 700 comprises access metrics collection functionality 720 and metadata collection functionality 722. As described hereinabove regarding FIGS. 1-6, access metrics collection functionality 720 preferably stores access metrics in an access metrics database 724 and metadata collection functionality 722 preferably stores data element metadata in metadata database 726.


Metatag functionality 730 is preferably provided to utilize databases 724 and 726 to automatically apply metatags to data elements residing anywhere on network 704, as described hereinabove with regard to FIGS. 1-6. Metatag functionality 730 preferably includes metatag application functionality 732, which is operative to apply metatags to data elements, and metatag recommendation functionality 734, which is operative to recommend application of metatags to data elements. Metatag application functionality 730 also preferably includes metatag owner validation functionality 736, which is operative to ascertain owners of data elements and to require the owners of the data elements to assign metatags to data elements or to validate recommendations of metatag assignment recommended by metatag recommendation functionality 734.


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the invention also includes various combinations and subcombinations of the features described hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing and which are not in the prior art.

Claims
  • 1. A method for characterizing data elements, each of said data elements being accessible to users of an enterprise computer network in accordance with access permissions explicitly assigned by an assigned owner thereof, said method comprising: continuously maintaining a database of at least one of said access permissions explicitly assigned by said assigned owner and actual usage of said data elements;continuously maintaining a database of data identifiers associated with said plurality of data elements;presenting to said assigned owner a visually sensible indication of authorization status, and to require said assigned owner to confirm or modify said authorization status;specifying, by an administrator, at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner and at least one data identifier;ascertaining which of said plurality of said data elements have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner;specifying, by an administrator, administrator defined metatags to be associated with each of said data elements ascertained to have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner;automatically applying a metatag from among said administrator defined metatags to ones of said plurality of data elements ascertained to have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one specific data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner;ascertaining an assigned owner for each one of said plurality of data elements ascertained to have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said at least one owner, said assigned owner having authority and accountability with respect to said one data element within said enterprise; andrequiring said assigned owner to review and validate said metatags automatically applied to said ones of said plurality of data elements owned thereby.
  • 2. The method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise according to claim 1 and wherein said automatically applying a metatag comprises automatically applying specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of said plurality of data elements.
  • 3. The method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise according to claim 1 and wherein said automatically applying a metatag comprises automatically applying to each one of said plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
  • 4. The method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise according to claim 1 and wherein said data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
  • 5. The method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise according to claim 1 and wherein said automatically applying a metatag comprises automatically applying a metatag to ones of said plurality of data elements.
  • 6. A system having a computer comprising a processor, a memory and a non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium in which computer program instructions are stored, which instructions, when executed by said processor, cause the computer to characterize data elements, each of said data elements being accessible to users of an enterprise computer network in accordance with access permissions explicitly assigned by an assigned owner thereof, said system comprising: access metrics collection functionality operative to collect at least one of said access permissions explicitly assigned by said assigned owner thereof and actual usage of said data elements;metadata collection functionality operative to collect data identifiers associated with said plurality of data elements;entitlement review by owner functionality operative to present to said assigned owner a visually sensible indication of authorization status, and to require said assigned owner to confirm or modify said authorization status;metatag specification functionality operative to facilitate specifying, by an administrator, administrator defined metatags to be associated with each of said data elements having at least one access metric permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner;metatag application functionality operative to utilize said access metrics collection functionality, said metadata collection functionality and said entitlement review by owner functionality to ascertain which of said plurality of said data elements have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one specific data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner, and to automatically apply a metatag from among said administrator defined metatags to ones of said plurality of data elements ascertained to have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner; andmetatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain an assigned owner of each one of said plurality of data elements ascertained to have said at least one access permission explicitly assigned by said assigned owner, said at least one data identifier associated therewith and have had an authorization status thereof modified by said assigned owner, said assigned owner having authority and accountability with respect to said one data element within said enterprise, and to require each of said assigned owners to review and validate said metatags automatically applied to said ones of said plurality of data elements owned thereby.
  • 7. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of said plurality of data elements.
  • 8. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply to each one of said plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
  • 9. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
  • 10. The system according to claim 6 and also comprising a metadata database which stores said metadata collected by said metadata collection functionality.
  • 11. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize said access metrics collection functionality and said metadata collection functionality to automatically employ said access metric and said data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of said plurality of data elements.
  • 12. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize said access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ said access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of said plurality of data elements.
  • 13. The system according to claim 6 and wherein said metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize said metadata collection functionality to automatically employ said data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of said plurality of data elements.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Reference is made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/348,829, filed May 27, 2010 and entitled “DATA MANAGEMENT USING DATA TAGGING”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (4) and (5)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/014,762, filed Jan. 27, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,023, filed May 12, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to the following patents and patent applications, owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,555,482 and 7,606,801; U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. 2007/0244899, 2008/0271157, 2009/0100058, 2009/0119298; 2009/0265780; 2011/0060916 and 2011/0061111; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691.

US Referenced Citations (154)
Number Name Date Kind
5465387 Mukherjee Nov 1995 A
5761669 Montague et al. Jun 1998 A
5889952 Hunnicutt et al. Mar 1999 A
5899991 Karch May 1999 A
6023765 Kuhn Feb 2000 A
6308173 Glasser et al. Oct 2001 B1
6338082 Schneider Jan 2002 B1
6393468 McGee May 2002 B1
6772350 Belani et al. Aug 2004 B1
6928439 Satoh Aug 2005 B2
7007032 Chen et al. Feb 2006 B1
7017183 Frey et al. Mar 2006 B1
7031984 Kawamura et al. Apr 2006 B2
7068592 Duvaut et al. Jun 2006 B1
7107538 Hinckley Sep 2006 B1
7124272 Kennedy et al. Oct 2006 B1
7401087 Copperman et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403925 Schlesinger et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421740 Fey et al. Sep 2008 B2
7505973 Kapadia et al. Mar 2009 B2
7529748 Wen et al. May 2009 B2
7555482 Korkus Jun 2009 B2
7568230 Lieberman et al. Jul 2009 B2
7606801 Faitelson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7716240 Lim May 2010 B2
7720858 Dettinger et al. May 2010 B2
7743420 Shulman et al. Jun 2010 B2
7797335 Stern et al. Sep 2010 B2
7797337 Fry Sep 2010 B2
7801894 Bone et al. Sep 2010 B1
7844582 Arbilla et al. Nov 2010 B1
7882098 Prahlad et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890530 Bilger et al. Feb 2011 B2
7979466 Wagner Jul 2011 B2
8171050 O'Halloran et al. May 2012 B2
8190638 Giampaolo et al. May 2012 B2
8239351 Hornqvist Aug 2012 B2
8239925 Faitelson et al. Aug 2012 B2
8250048 Yalamanchi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8285748 Thomas et al. Oct 2012 B2
8306999 Gass, III et al. Nov 2012 B2
8417678 Bone et al. Apr 2013 B2
8438124 Spivack May 2013 B2
8463815 Zoellner Jun 2013 B1
8521766 Hoarty Aug 2013 B1
8612404 Bone et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626803 Hsu et al. Jan 2014 B2
8799225 Valtzblit et al. Aug 2014 B2
8898623 Zhao et al. Nov 2014 B2
10037358 Faitelson et al. Jul 2018 B2
10296596 Faitelson et al. May 2019 B2
20020002557 Straube et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020138631 Friedel Sep 2002 A1
20030048301 Menninger Mar 2003 A1
20030051026 Carter et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030188198 Holdsworth et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030231207 Huang Dec 2003 A1
20040030915 Sameshima et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040186809 Schlesinger et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205342 Roegner Oct 2004 A1
20040249847 Wang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254919 Giuseppini Dec 2004 A1
20050044399 Dorey Feb 2005 A1
20050065823 Ramraj et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050086268 Rogers Apr 2005 A1
20050086529 Buchsbaum Apr 2005 A1
20050108206 Lam et al. May 2005 A1
20050120054 Shulman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050172126 Lange et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050203881 Sakamoto et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050246762 Girouard et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278334 Fey et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278785 Lieberman Dec 2005 A1
20060064313 Steinbarth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075503 Bunker et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060090208 Smith Apr 2006 A1
20060184459 Parida Aug 2006 A1
20060184530 Song et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060271523 Brookler et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060277184 Faitelson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060294578 Burke et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070033340 Tulskie et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050366 Bugir et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061487 Moore et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073698 Kanayama et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070094265 Korkus Apr 2007 A1
20070101387 Hua et al. May 2007 A1
20070112743 Giampaolo et al. May 2007 A1
20070136291 Bird Jun 2007 A1
20070156659 Lim Jul 2007 A1
20070156693 Soin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198608 Prahlad et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203872 Flinn et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070214497 Montgomery et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244899 Faitelson et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070261121 Jacobson Nov 2007 A1
20070266006 Buss Nov 2007 A1
20070276823 Borden et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282855 Chen et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005024 Kirkwood Jan 2008 A1
20080031447 Geshwind et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080034402 Botz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080097998 Herbach Apr 2008 A1
20080162707 Beck et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172720 Botz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201348 Edmonds et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080270462 Thomsen Oct 2008 A1
20080271157 Faitelson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090031418 Matsuda et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037558 Stone et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090077124 Spivack et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090100058 Faitelson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119298 Faitelson et al. May 2009 A1
20090150981 Amies et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157570 Pall et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163183 ODonoghue et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182715 Falkenberg Jul 2009 A1
20090198892 Alvarez et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090249290 Jenkins et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249446 Jenkins et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265780 Korkus et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090282045 Hsieh et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292930 Marano et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090320088 Gill et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100037324 Grant et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057815 Spivack et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070881 Hanson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100100524 Bae et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114977 Bacher May 2010 A1
20100174731 Vermeulen et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185650 Topaean et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100235396 Chaurasia Sep 2010 A1
20100242083 Begum Sep 2010 A1
20100257456 Lieb et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100299763 Marcus et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110010758 Faitelson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110040793 Davidson et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047466 Michelman Feb 2011 A1
20110060916 Faitelson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110061093 Korkus et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110061111 Faitelson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110184989 Faitelson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110219028 Dove et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110247074 Manring et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110296490 Faitelson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120054283 Korkus et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120173583 Faitelsor et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179681 Faitelson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120191646 Faitelson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120221550 Korkus et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271853 Faitelson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271855 Faitelson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120291100 Faitelson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20180373762 Faitelson et al. Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
1588889 Mar 2005 CN
101226537 Jul 2008 CN
101583953 Nov 2009 CN
101681405 Mar 2010 CN
1248178 Oct 2002 EP
2008073978 Jun 2008 WO
2008111774 Sep 2008 WO
2011030324 Mar 2011 WO
2011092684 Apr 2011 WO
2011092685 Aug 2011 WO
2011092686 Aug 2011 WO
2011148364 Dec 2011 WO
2011148375 Dec 2011 WO
2011148376 Dec 2011 WO
2011148377 Dec 2011 WO
2012101620 Aug 2012 WO
2012143920 Oct 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (118)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 61/348,862, filed May 27, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/348,829, filed May 27, 2010.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1.
GENUNIX; “Writing Filesystems—VFS and Vnode Interfaces”, 5 pages, Oct. 2007.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1.
S.R. Kleiman; “Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX”, USENIX Association: Summer Conference Proceedings, Atlanta 1986; 10 pages.
An Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
Varonis; “White Paper: The Business Case for Data Governance”, dated Mar. 27, 2007, 8 pages.
An Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786228.4.
An Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
Findutils; GNU Project—Free Software Foundation (FSF), 3 pages, Nov. 2006.
An Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Office Action dated May 21, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786228.4.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000408.
Varonis; “Accelerating Audits with Automation: Understanding Who's Accessing Your Unstructured Data”, Oct. 8, 2007, 7 pages.
An Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
Alex Woodie; “Varonis Prevents Unauthorized Access to Unstructured Data”, Four Hundred Stuff, vol. 7, No. 9, Jul. 31, 2007, 6 pages.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 1.0, Aug. 30, 2005.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.0, Aug. 24, 2006.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.5, Nov. 27, 2006.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.6, Dec. 15, 2006.
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007.
A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007.
A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007.
“Entitlement reviews: A Practitioner's Guide” by Varonis, 2007.
An Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,748.
An Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
Sahadeb De, et al; “Secure Access Control in a Multi-user Geodatabase,” available on the Internet at the URL htto://www10.qiscafe.com. 2005, 10 pages.
An Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884.
An Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884.
An Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2016, which issued during the prosecution Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1.
An English Translation of a Notice of Reexamination dated Sep. 6, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1.
A Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 21, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,023.
An Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,967.
An Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522.
An Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/673,691.
An Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 23, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00065.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 20, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL10/00069.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 24, 2011 which suedduring the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00077.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 25, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00078.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jun. 14, 2011 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00066.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 15, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00408.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Oct. 1, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2012/000240.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000065.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 13, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2010/000069.
An Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000078.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/00066.
An Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028.
An Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028.
An Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,748.
An Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,736.
An Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/014,762.
Sara C. Madeira and Arlindo L. Oliveira; Biclustering Algorithms for Biological data Analysis: A Survey; Mar. 2004; http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr05/cos598E/bib/bicluster.pdf.
Sara C. Madeira; Clustering, Fuzzy Clustering and Biclustering: An Overview; p. 31 to 53, Jun. 27, 2003.
Edgar Weippl, et al; “Content-based Management of Document Access”, 14th International Conference on Applications of Prolog (INAP), 2001, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/688,486, filed Jun. 7, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/240,726, filed Sep. 9, 2009.
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of German Patent Application No. 11 2006 001 378.5.
An Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,807.
An Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256.
An Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Interview Summary dated Jul. 17, 2017,which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450.
An Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 13, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00902.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522.
An Interview Summary dated Dec. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An Interview Summary dated Sep. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
Suto, Augmenting the Core Functionality of an e-Science Grid Multi-Tier Front-End: GridSphere-based Reengineering of EPIC; Dec. 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011].
Stagni, on Usage Control for Data Grids: Models, Architecture, and Specifications, Mar. 2009, [Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011].
An Interview Summary dated Apr. 15, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Dec. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Jul. 17,2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated May 13, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Oct. 19, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Interview Summary dated Sep. 8, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 3, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000409.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000409.
An Advisory Action dated Jan. 12, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Advisory Action dated Mar. 27, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465.
An Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Indian Patent Application No. 2831/MUMNP/2012.
An Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Indian Patent Application No. 2881/MUMNP/2012.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Aug. 31, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2012/000163.
An Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059.
An Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059.
European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786229.2.
An Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/159,903.
An Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,826.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 2, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000407.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000407.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jun. 13, 2011 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00076.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/000076.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190310967 A1 Oct 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61348829 May 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13384465 US
Child 16384111 US