The present invention relates to improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.
The following patent publications are believed to represent the current state of the art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,465,387; 5,899,991; 6,338,082; 6,393,468; 6,928,439; 7,031,984; 7,068,592; 7,403,925; 7,421,740; 7,555,482, 7,606,801 and 7,743,420; and
U.S. Published Patent Application Nos.: 2003/0051026; 2004/0249847; 2005/0108206; 2005/0203881; 2005/0086529; 2006/0064313; 2006/0184530; 2006/0184459; 2007/0203872; 2007/0244899; 2008/0271157; 2009/0100058; 2009/0119298 and 2009/0265780.
The present invention provides improved systems and methodologies for data tagging.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the employing includes automatically applying specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining at least one of an access metric and a data identifier for each of a plurality of data elements and employing the at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes automatically recommending application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the employing includes automatically recommending application to each of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes ascertaining an owner for each of the plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the employing includes employing an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the employing includes employing an access metric to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the employing includes employing a data identifier to automatically recommend application of metatags to the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is even further provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and requiring the owner to review and validate metatags applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including ascertaining an owner for each of a plurality of data elements and automatically recommending application of metatags by the owner to the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of access metrics for the each of a plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the method for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes maintaining a database of data identifiers for the each of a plurality of data elements.
There is further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method of operating a file system including maintaining a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements; applying the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and automatically synchronizing the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.
There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag application functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate the metatags automatically applied to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to automatically apply to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise and also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.
Preferably, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment, the metatag application functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically apply a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including access metrics collection functionality operative to collect access metrics associated with a plurality of data elements, metadata collection functionality operative to collect metadata associated with the plurality of data elements and metatag recommendation functionality operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ at least one of an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend application of specific ones of a plurality of different metatags to specific ones of the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to automatically recommend applying to each one of the plurality of data elements a metatag previously applied to a parent folder thereof.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of the recommended metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the data identifier is one of file type, author, category and language.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores the access metrics collected by the access metrics collection functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores the metadata collected by the metadata collection functionality.
Preferably, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality and the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric and a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. Alternatively, the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the access metrics collection functionality to automatically employ an access metric to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements. In another alternative embodiment the metatag recommendation functionality is also operative to utilize the metadata collection functionality to automatically employ a data identifier to automatically recommend application of a metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements.
There is even further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of the plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners apply at least one metatag to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is also provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to require each of the owners to review and validate application of metatags to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is yet further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise including metatag owner validation functionality operative to ascertain owners of each of a plurality of data elements and to recommend application of metatags by each of the owners to ones of the plurality of data elements of which he is the owner.
Preferably, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes an access metrics database which stores access metrics associated with the plurality of data elements. Additionally or alternatively, the system for characterizing data elements in an enterprise also includes a metadata database which stores metadata associated with the plurality of data elements.
There is still further provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a system of operating a file system including a data owner/administrator accessible database of metatags assigned by data owner/administers to a plurality of data elements, metatag application functionality operative to apply the metatags to the plurality of data elements in a storage platform and synchronizing functionality operative to automatically synchronize the metatags applied to the plurality of data elements and the database.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The term “data identifier” is used throughout to refer to metadata associated with a data element. The data identifier may be a content-based data identifier or a non content-based data identifier. A content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes, for example, keywords or an abstract of the content of the data element. A non content-based data identifier associated with a data element preferably includes characteristics associated with the data element such as, for example, file type, author, category and language. A non content-based data identifier associated with a data element may also include one or more non content-based data identifiers associated with a parent folder of the data element. It is appreciated that the metadata may comprise predefined characteristics provided by the system which hosts the data elements or user-defined characteristics.
The term “metatag” is used throughout to refer to a metadata tag which is associated with a data element. Metatags are useful, for example, for automating data management tasks and for identifying data elements which may be grouped or categorized together for purposes of automatic or manual data management tasks.
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (406), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and validate the metatag automatically applied to the data element (408).
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Additionally, the system preferably ascertains an owner for each of the subset of data elements (506), and requires the owner of each of the subset of data elements to review and approve the recommendation to apply the at least one metatag to the data element (508).
Reference is now made to
The operation of the automatic data tagging system of
The automatic data tagging system of
Preferably, the system continuously maintains a database of actual access and access permissions of every user to every data element in the enterprise. This functionality is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,801, in U.S. Published Patent Application 2009/0265780 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691 owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Access permissions and/or actual access are together designated as access metrics and may be used to designate subsets of all of the data elements in the enterprise.
Preferably, the system also continuously crawls over at least a subset of all data elements in the enterprise and maintains a database of metadata associated with each of the subset of data elements.
As shown in
Reference is now made to
As shown in
Metatag functionality 730 is preferably provided to utilize databases 724 and 726 to automatically apply metatags to data elements residing anywhere on network 704, as described hereinabove with regard to
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the invention also includes various combinations and subcombinations of the features described hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing and which are not in the prior art.
Reference is made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/348,829, filed May 27, 2010 and entitled “DATA MANAGEMENT USING DATA TAGGING”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (4) and (5)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/014,762, filed Jan. 27, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,023, filed May 12, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to the following patents and patent applications, owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,555,482 and 7,606,801; U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. 2007/0244899, 2008/0271157, 2009/0100058, 2009/0119298; 2009/0265780; 2011/0060916 and 2011/0061111; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5465387 | Mukherjee | Nov 1995 | A |
5761669 | Montague et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5889952 | Hunnicutt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899991 | Karch | May 1999 | A |
6023765 | Kuhn | Feb 2000 | A |
6308173 | Glasser et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338082 | Schneider | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6393468 | McGee | May 2002 | B1 |
6772350 | Belani et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6928439 | Satoh | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7007032 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7017183 | Frey et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031984 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068592 | Duvaut et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7107538 | Hinckley | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7124272 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7401087 | Copperman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403925 | Schlesinger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421740 | Fey et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7505973 | Kapadia et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529748 | Wen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555482 | Korkus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568230 | Lieberman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606801 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7716240 | Lim | May 2010 | B2 |
7720858 | Dettinger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743420 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7797335 | Stern et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797337 | Fry | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801894 | Bone et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7844582 | Arbilla et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7882098 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890530 | Bilger et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7979466 | Wagner | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8171050 | O'Halloran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190638 | Giampaolo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8239351 | Hornqvist | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239925 | Faitelson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250048 | Yalamanchi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8285748 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306999 | Gass, III et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8417678 | Bone et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438124 | Spivack | May 2013 | B2 |
8463815 | Zoellner | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8521766 | Hoarty | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8612404 | Bone et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626803 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8799225 | Valtzblit et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8898623 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
10037358 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10296596 | Faitelson et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
20020002557 | Straube et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020138631 | Friedel | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030048301 | Menninger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030188198 | Holdsworth et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231207 | Huang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030915 | Sameshima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040186809 | Schlesinger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205342 | Roegner | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249847 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254919 | Giuseppini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050044399 | Dorey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065823 | Ramraj et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086268 | Rogers | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086529 | Buchsbaum | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108206 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120054 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172126 | Lange et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203881 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246762 | Girouard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278334 | Fey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278785 | Lieberman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060064313 | Steinbarth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075503 | Bunker et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090208 | Smith | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060184459 | Parida | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184530 | Song et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060271523 | Brookler et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277184 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294578 | Burke et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033340 | Tulskie et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050366 | Bugir et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061487 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073698 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094265 | Korkus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101387 | Hua et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112743 | Giampaolo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136291 | Bird | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156659 | Lim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156693 | Soin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198608 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203872 | Flinn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214497 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244899 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261121 | Jacobson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266006 | Buss | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276823 | Borden et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282855 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005024 | Kirkwood | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031447 | Geshwind et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034402 | Botz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097998 | Herbach | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080162707 | Beck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172720 | Botz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201348 | Edmonds et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080270462 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271157 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090031418 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037558 | Stone et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077124 | Spivack et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100058 | Faitelson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119298 | Faitelson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150981 | Amies et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157570 | Pall et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163183 | ODonoghue et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182715 | Falkenberg | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198892 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249290 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249446 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265780 | Korkus et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282045 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292930 | Marano et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320088 | Gill et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037324 | Grant et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057815 | Spivack et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070881 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100524 | Bae et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114977 | Bacher | May 2010 | A1 |
20100174731 | Vermeulen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185650 | Topaean et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100235396 | Chaurasia | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242083 | Begum | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257456 | Lieb et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100299763 | Marcus et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110010758 | Faitelson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040793 | Davidson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047466 | Michelman | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060916 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061093 | Korkus et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061111 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184989 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219028 | Dove et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247074 | Manring et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296490 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120054283 | Korkus et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173583 | Faitelsor et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179681 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191646 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120221550 | Korkus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271853 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271855 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291100 | Faitelson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20180373762 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1588889 | Mar 2005 | CN |
101226537 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101583953 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101681405 | Mar 2010 | CN |
1248178 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2008073978 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008111774 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2011030324 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011092684 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011092685 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011092686 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011148364 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148375 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148376 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011148377 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012101620 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012143920 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 61/348,862, filed May 27, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/348,829, filed May 27, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1. |
GENUNIX; “Writing Filesystems—VFS and Vnode Interfaces”, 5 pages, Oct. 2007. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036152.1. |
S.R. Kleiman; “Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX”, USENIX Association: Summer Conference Proceedings, Atlanta 1986; 10 pages. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
Varonis; “White Paper: The Business Case for Data Governance”, dated Mar. 27, 2007, 8 pages. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786228.4. |
An Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
Findutils; GNU Project—Free Software Foundation (FSF), 3 pages, Nov. 2006. |
An Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Office Action dated May 21, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786228.4. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000408. |
Varonis; “Accelerating Audits with Automation: Understanding Who's Accessing Your Unstructured Data”, Oct. 8, 2007, 7 pages. |
An Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
Alex Woodie; “Varonis Prevents Unauthorized Access to Unstructured Data”, Four Hundred Stuff, vol. 7, No. 9, Jul. 31, 2007, 6 pages. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 1.0, Aug. 30, 2005. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.0, Aug. 24, 2006. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.5, Nov. 27, 2006. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.6, Dec. 15, 2006. |
DatAdvantage User Guide by Varonis, Version 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007. |
A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007. |
A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007. |
“Entitlement reviews: A Practitioner's Guide” by Varonis, 2007. |
An Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,748. |
An Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
Sahadeb De, et al; “Secure Access Control in a Multi-user Geodatabase,” available on the Internet at the URL htto://www10.qiscafe.com. 2005, 10 pages. |
An Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
An Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
An Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2016, which issued during the prosecution Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1. |
An English Translation of a Notice of Reexamination dated Sep. 6, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036674.1. |
A Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 21, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,023. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,967. |
An Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/673,691. |
An Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 23, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00065. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 20, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL10/00069. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 24, 2011 which suedduring the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00077. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated May 25, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00078. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jun. 14, 2011 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00066. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 15, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00408. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Oct. 1, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2012/000240. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000065. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 13, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2010/000069. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000078. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/00066. |
An Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
An Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,748. |
An Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,736. |
An Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/014,762. |
Sara C. Madeira and Arlindo L. Oliveira; Biclustering Algorithms for Biological data Analysis: A Survey; Mar. 2004; http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr05/cos598E/bib/bicluster.pdf. |
Sara C. Madeira; Clustering, Fuzzy Clustering and Biclustering: An Overview; p. 31 to 53, Jun. 27, 2003. |
Edgar Weippl, et al; “Content-based Management of Document Access”, 14th International Conference on Applications of Prolog (INAP), 2001, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/688,486, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/240,726, filed Sep. 9, 2009. |
An English Translation of an Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of German Patent Application No. 11 2006 001 378.5. |
An Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,807. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
An Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Interview Summary dated Jul. 17, 2017,which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,450. |
An Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2008, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 13, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00902. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522. |
An Interview Summary dated Dec. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An Interview Summary dated Sep. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
Suto, Augmenting the Core Functionality of an e-Science Grid Multi-Tier Front-End: GridSphere-based Reengineering of EPIC; Dec. 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011]. |
Stagni, on Usage Control for Data Grids: Models, Architecture, and Specifications, Mar. 2009, [Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011]. |
An Interview Summary dated Apr. 15, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Dec. 5, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Jul. 17,2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated May 13, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Oct. 19, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Interview Summary dated Sep. 8, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,459. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 3, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000409. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000409. |
An Advisory Action dated Jan. 12, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Advisory Action dated Mar. 27, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,465. |
An Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Indian Patent Application No. 2831/MUMNP/2012. |
An Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2019, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Indian Patent Application No. 2881/MUMNP/2012. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Aug. 31, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2012/000163. |
An Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059. |
An Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,059. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11786229.2. |
An Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/159,903. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,826. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 2, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000407. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000407. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jun. 13, 2011 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00076. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/000076. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190310967 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61348829 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13384465 | US | |
Child | 16384111 | US |