Patent Grant
8442943
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material to which the claim of copyright protection is made. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by any person of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but reserves all other rights whatsoever
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the transference of data between two systems independent of the form in which the data is kept on the respective systems, and in particular to providing an efficient means of communicating data between systems and devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
The growth of computing-related devices has not been limited to personal computers or work stations. The number of personal computing devices has grown substantially in both type and format. Small, hand-held computers carry a multitude of contact, personal, document, and other information and are sophisticated enough to allow a user to fax, send e-mails, and communicate in other ways wirelessly. Even advanced cellular phones carry enough memory and processing power to store contact information, surf the web, and provide text messaging. Along with the growth in the sophistication of these devices, the need to transfer information between them has grown significantly as well.
With a multitude of different device types on the market, keeping information between the different devices synchronized has become increasingly problematic. For example, if an individual keeps a calendar of information on a personal computer in his or her office using a particular personal information manager application, the individual would generally like to have the same information available in a cellular phone, hand-held organizer, and perhaps a home personal computer. The individual may additionally have a notebook computer which requires synchronizing file data such as presentations or working documents between the notebook and the office computer.
Until now, synchronization between both documents and personal information managers has occurred through direct connection between the devices, and generally directly between applications such as a personal information manager in one device and a personal information manager in another device or using an intermediary sync-mapping program.
One example of this is the prevalent use of the 3Com Palm® OS-based organizer, such as the 3Com Palm® series of computing devices, which uses its own calendaring system, yet lets users synchronize the data therein with a variety of different personal information manager software packages, such as Symantec's ACT!™, Microsoft's Outlook®, and other systems. In this example, an intermediary synchronization program such as Puma Technology, Inc.'s Intellisync® is required. Intellisync® is an application program which runs on both the hand-held device and the computer which stores the information data and maps data systems between non-uniform data records. In other cases, direct transfer between applications such as transfer between Microsoft's Outlook® computer-based client and Microsoft's Windows CE “Pocket Outlook” application, is possible. Nevertheless, in both cases, synchronization occurs through direct connection between a personal computer and the personal computing device. While this connection is generally via a cable directly connecting, for example, Palm® device in a cradle to the personal computer, the connection may be wireless as well.
One component of these synchronization systems is that the synchronization process must be able to delineate between when changes are made to specific databases and must make a decision about whether to replace the changed field. Normally, this is measured by a change in one database, and no-change in a second database. In some cases, both databases will have changed between syncs. In this case, the sync operation must determine which of the two changes which has been made is to “win” and replace the other during the sync. Generally, this determinant of whether a conflict exists allows some means for letting the user resolve the conflict.
In a technical sense, synchronization in this manner is generally accomplished by the copying of full records between systems. At some level, a user is generally required to map data fields from one application to another and specify which data fields are assigned to which corresponding field in a different device. Less mapping is required where developers more robustly support various platforms of applications.
In many instances, the data to be synchronized is generally in the form of text data such as records of addresses, contact information, calendar information, notes and other types of contact information. In certain instances, data to be synchronized will be binary format of executable files or word processor-specific documents. In many cases where document synchronization is required, the synchronization routine simply determines whether or not the documents in question have changed, and uses a time-based representation to determine which of the two files is newer, and replaces the older file with the newer file to achieve synchronization, as long as the older of the two files was in fact not changed. This is the model used in the familiar “Briefcase” function in Microsoft Windows-based systems. If both files have changed, then the synchronization routine presents the option of conflict resolution to the user.
Such synchronization schemes are generally relatively inefficient since they require full band-width of the document or binary file to be transferred via the synchronization link. In addition, at some level the synchronization programs require interaction by the user to map certain fields between different programs.
One of the difficulties in providing synchronization between different computing devices is that the applications and platforms are somewhat diverse.
Nevertheless, all synchronization programs generally require certain functions in order to be viable for widespread usage. In particular, synchronization programs must work with popular applications on various platforms. Sync applications must allow for conflicts resolution when changes are made to the same information on different devices between syncing events. They must provide synchronization for all types of formats of data, whether it be text data in the form of contacts, e-mails, calendar information, memos or other documents, or binary data in the form of documents or programs in particular types of formats.
In a broader sense, applications which efficiently synchronize data between disparate types of devices can provide advantages in applications beyond synchronizing individual, personal information between, for example, a personal information manager hardware device such as a Palm® computing device, and a personal computer. The same objectives which are prevalent in developing data transfer between personal information management (PIM) devices and desktop systems lend themselves to furthering applications requiring data transfer between other types of devices, on differing platforms. These objectives include speed, low bandwidth, accuracy, and platform independence.
For example, current e-mail systems use a system which is somewhat akin to the synchronization methods used for disparate devices in that an entire message or file is transferred as a whole between different systems. When a user replies to an e-mail, generally the entire text of the original message is returned to the sender, who now has two copies of the e-mail text he/she originally sent out. The same is true if an e-mail attachment is modified and returned. All of the text which is the same between both systems is essentially duplicated on the originator's system.
The invention, roughly described, comprises a difference information receiver, a difference information transmitter and a difference information synchronizer which cooperate in a system or device to update data in the device with data received from other systems, or provide data for other systems to use in updating themselves.
In one aspect, the invention comprises a system in a device having at least one application data destination having a format. The system includes a difference engine receiving difference information associated with a change to said at least one application data destination; and an application interface, applying said difference information to said at least one data destination.
The difference engine may comprise a data store reflecting application data at a state prior to receipt of said difference information; and a delta engine receiving difference information and comparing difference information to said data store to construct change information. Further, the difference information may comprises a data file containing change transactions which is combined with data in the data store.
In a further aspect, the method may comprise a method for updating data files in a system. The method may include the steps of: receiving difference information for a subset of said data files; and applying said difference information to said subset of said data files. In particular said step of receiving may comprise: receiving a change log detailing changes to data files on another system; and applying said changes to a data store containing data identical to said data files to generate changed data.
In a further unique aspect, the invention my comprise an application in a system having a data source in a source format. The application may include an application interface, extracting data from said data source; and a difference engine receiving said data and outputting difference information associated with changes to said data source. The application interface may includes a source format interface; and a converter to map said data from said source format into a universal format. In addition, the difference engine may include a data store reflecting a prior state of said data; and a delta generator comparing said data and said data store to provide change transactions.
In a still further aspect, the invention may comprise a method for updating a data source in a system. The method may include the steps of extracting difference information from at least a subset of said data source; and outputting difference information for at least the subset of said data source. The step of extracting may comprise determining whether changes have been made to the subset of data source in the system; and generating a change log detailing changes to the subset of data source on another system.
In yet another aspect, the application of the present invention includes: an extraction routine for extracting a first set of difference information resulting from changes to the data files; a differencing transmitter for transmitting said first set of difference information to an output; a differencing receiver for receiving a second set of difference information from an input; and a reconstruction routine for applying the second set of difference information to the data files.
A further method of the invention comprises a method for updating data files in a system. The method includes the steps of receiving first change transactions for a subset of said data files; applying said change transactions to said subset of said data files. subsequent to a change in said data files, generating second change transactions for said file; and outputting said second change transactions to an output.
In a particular embodiment, the invention comprises a device engine including an application object; an application object store; and a delta module.
The invention will be described with respect to the particular embodiments thereof. Other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become apparent with reference to the specification and drawings in which:
The present invention includes a system and a method for transferring data between two devices which require information to be shared between them. In accordance with the discussion herein, a “device” is defined as a collection of elements or components organized for a common purpose, and may include hardware components of a computer system, personal information devices, hand-held computers, notebooks, or any combination of hardware which may include a processor and memory which is adapted to receive or provide information to another device; or any software containing such information residing on a single collection of hardware or on different collections of hardware. Such software might include applications such as personal information managers, which include contact data and other such information, e-mail systems, and file systems, such as those utilized by Microsoft Windows NT operating systems, Unix operating systems, Linux operating systems, or other systems capable of storing file types having binary formats which translate to application formats of differing types.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises a set of programs specifically designed to transmit and/or receive differencing data from one device to another device, irrespective of the type of file system, data, content, or system hardware configuration.
In a further aspect, the system comprises store and forward technology which utilizes the differencing technology to implement services via a public or private network, such as the Internet.
The system of the present invention finds particular usages in synchronizing personal contact information between different systems, but it will be readily apparent to one of average skill in the art that the present invention provides advantages having broader applicability than merely synchronizing various types of systems. For example, replying and forwarding e-mail can be made more efficient by forwarding only the differences in e-mails between systems. As a further example, updates to systems software via a network can be made more efficient where, for example, instead of completely replacing different modules of an application, only the differences of the modules need be forwarded, resulting in more efficient use of existing bandwidth.
System Overview
The differencing transmitter 100, upon receipt of a control signal enabling operation of the transmitter, examines a specified data structure of information which is to be transmitted to system B. Differencing transmitter 100 extracts such information from System A and converts the information extracted into difference information Δ. Difference information Δ comprises only the changes to System B's data which have occurred on System B and instructions for implementing those changes. Hence, if the data to be transferred is a change to a file which exists on system B, difference information Δ comprises only the differences in such file and where such differences occur. If the data does not exist at all on System B, the difference information Δ will be the entire file. Difference information Δ received by differencing receiver 102 at System B is reconstructed at System B, and the changes reflected therein are updated on System B.
For example, if System A and System B are two computers and an update for certain binary files on System A is required, the differencing transmitter on System A will extract the differences in the file known to exist on System B and any new files, and transmit only those differences (an instructions for where to insert those differences) to the differencing receiver 102. Differencing receiver 102 will interpret the difference information (Δ) and reconstruct the binary files on System B. In this manner, the information on System B is updated without the need to transfer the entire binary files between the Systems.
Once again, the storage server 300 is coupled by a direct connection 110 to both System A and System B. Storage server 300 may be a server specifically adapted to receive differencing information A from the receiver 100 and provide it to the transmitter 102. In one embodiment, server 300 includes specific functional routines for enabling this transfer. Alternatively, server 300 comprises standard information server types which respond to standard Internet communication protocols such as file transfer protocol (FTP), or hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP).
In the following description, an embodiment wherein the differencing receiver, transmitter, and synchronizer are described will be discussed with respect to its use in synchronizing contact information, calendar information, and binary file information between a plurality of different devices in the context of data synchronization. It will be readily understood that the system of the present invention is not limited to synchronization applications, or applications dependent upon specific types of data, such as contact information or scheduling information. In particular, it will be readily understood that the transmission of data comprising only the differences in data between two systems via routines which extract the data and reassemble data on the various systems, represents a significant advancement in the efficient transmission of data. The present invention allows for optimization in terms of a reduction in the bandwidth utilized to transmit data between two systems, since only changes to data are transferred. This consequently increases the speed at which such transactions can take place since the data which needs to be transmitted is substantially smaller than it would be were entire files transferred between the systems.
In a particular embodiment of the present invention, the ability of devices to connect to the Internet is leveraged to manage data transfer between the systems. In essence, each particular device which requires information access which can connect to the Internet may become part of the system of the present invention, and synchronize its data with other devices defined by a user as being part of the system.
Generally, the system comprises client software which provides the functions of the differencing transmitter 100, differencing receiver 102, and differencing synchronizer 104 in the form of a device engine. The device engine includes at least one component particular to the type of device on which the device engine runs, which enables extraction of information from the device and conversion of the information to difference information, and transmission of the difference information to the storage server. This allows the replication of information across all systems coupled to the system of the present invention. Although the storage servers 300 utilized in the system of the present invention may be any type of storage server, such as an Internet server or an FTP server, and may be provided from any source, such as any Internet service provider (ISP), particular aspects of a storage server which may be useful and which may be customized to optimize transfer of information between systems coupled as part of the present invention will be described below. Synchronization of devices utilizing the synchronization system of the present invention is possible as long as an Internet connection between the devices is available.
In a key aspect of the invention, the Internet connection between the devices or between the devices and a server, need not exist at the same point in time, and new devices may be added to the system of the present invention at any point in time without the loss of information. The system provides totally transparent access to information and the device engine on each device provides an operating system independent extension which allows seamless integration of the personal information services in accordance with the present invention.
In a particular unique aspect of the present invention, only those changes to the information which are required to be forwarded to other systems on the system of the present invention are transmitted to enable exceptionally fast response times. In a still further aspect of the invention, information which is transferred in this manner is encrypted to ensure security over the public portions of the Internet.
Architecture Overview
The present invention contemplates the use of two types of device engine: one totally embodied on the server which outputs change data to the server; and a second totally embodied on the server receiving device generated change information from the device. In addition, a hybrid of the two, having a portion of the device engine on the device and a portion on the server, is disclosed.
As shown in
In order to access the specific application data of each of the systems shown in
As shown in
Data from each of the devices is coupled via an Internet connection 710 with a storage server 850. As noted above, storage server 850 may be a generic storage server or it may be a storage server specifically adapted for use with the system of the present invention as discussed below. One or more of the storage servers 850 are used to communicate transactions amongst the collection of systems 802, 804, 806, 808. It should be readily recognized that any number of different types of systems 802, 804, 806, 808 may be provided in accordance with the present invention and incorporated into the system. However, for brevity, not all the different types of commercially available computing devices which are currently in use or in development, in which the system of the present invention may be incorporated, are listed.
In its simplest embodiment, the storage server 850 is simply a dumb storage server and each of the device engines transmits only difference information thereto to be stored in a particular location accessible by other device engines in the system. In one embodiment, each device engine implements all processing required to keep all the systems fully synchronized. Only one device engine needs to be coupled to the storage server 850 at one particular point in time. This permits synchronization of multiple systems in a disconnected fashion. Each device engine will download all transactions encapsulating changes that have occurred since the last synchronization from the server and apply them to the particular device.
The change or difference information (Δ) is provided in one or more data packages, the structure of which is described herein. Each data package describes changes to any and all transfer information across all device engines, including but not limited to application data, files, folders, application settings, and the like. Each device engine can control the download of data packages that include classes of information that apply to the specified local device 802, 804, 806 or 808 attached to that specific device engine. For example, device engine 862 will only need to work with changes to information describing contact names and phone numbers in application data 822, while device engine 866 will be required to work with changes to e-mail, changes to document files, notes, as well as contact and address information since the application data 826 is much more extensive than application data 822.
Each device engine includes compression/decompression and encryption/decryption components which allow encryption and/or compression of the data packages transmitted across Internet connection 710. It should be recognized that compression and encryption of the data packages may be optionally provided. It is not required in accordance with the present invention. Each device engine performs mapping and translation steps necessary for applying the data packages to the local format required for that type of information in the application data stores 822-828. The device engine also includes components which allow it to track ambiguous updates in cases where users have changed data to a particular data field on two different systems simultaneously since the last update. In this case, the device engine includes a mechanism for drawing this to the attention of the user and allowing the user to resolve the conflict.
Device Engine Architecture
While the invention will be described with respect to the embodiment of the invention as a differencing synchronizer 104, it will be readily understood that portions of the functionality are utilized as needed in a forward-only (a differencing transmitter) or a receive-only (a differencing receiver) capacity as required by the particular application.
As noted above, a device engine exists for each and every device that makes up a user's personal information network of devices in the system. As shown in
Also provided is an application object store (AOS) 920 which includes a copy of the device's data at a point just after the previous data extraction and synchronization occurred. Application object store 920 is a mirrored interface which stores a snapshot of the previous state of the data from the application object 910 in the device engine. The size of the AOS will depend on the data being collected by each device engine.
The generic output of the application object is provided to a delta module 950. Delta module 950 is a differencing engine which calculates differences in data between the output of the application object 910 and the copy of the data which is provided in an application object store (AOS) 920. The actual differencing and patch routine can comprise a routine such as XDelta or YDelta. The delta module 950 will be referred to herein alternatively in certain portions of the description as “CStructuredDelta.” In addition, the difference information is alternatively referred to herein as a “change log.” Each change log (or set of difference information) is a self describing series of sync transactions. As described below, the change log may be encrypted and compressed before output to the network.
Hence, during a sync, the Application Object will, using a mechanism discussed below, extract the data of each application in the device and convert it to a universal data format. The delta module will then generate a difference set by comparing the output of the Application Object and the AOS. This difference information is forwarded to the encryption and compression routines for output to the storage server 850 in the form of a data package. Alternatively, the data from one application can be used to synchronize to data in another application in, for example, a windows environment, as shown by arrow 1050 in
It should be specifically noted that the application object may interface directly unstructured binary data or with structured application data. The differencing routine supports both uses of the delta module 950 in comparison generation.
In some cases, operation of the application object and delta module is simplified by the fact that some applications, such as PDA's, have the ability to output changes to its data. In such cases, the delta module 950 need only provide the data into the data package, since comparison to an AOS is not required—the application already includes a mechanism for tracking changes made to its own data. However, in many cases the applications provide, at most, a standard interface to access the data, such as Microsoft's OBDC interface, the Microsoft standard Application Programming Interface (API), or other similar standard interfaces.
Device engine 860 further includes a versioning module which applies a version number per object in the data package. As explained further below, each object in the data package is assigned a universally unique ID (UUID). Hence, unlike many prior synchronization systems, the system of the present invention does not sync data solely by comparing time stamps of two sets of data. Versioning module 915 allows each device engine to check the state of the last synchronization against data packs which have been provided to the storage server to determine which data packages to apply. This allows the device engine to sync itself independently of the number of times another device engine uploads changes to the storage server. In other words, a first device engine does not care how many times a second device engine uploads data packages to the server.
An events module 925 controls synchronization initialization events. Items such as when to sync, how to sync, trigger the delta module 950 to perform a synchronization operation.
A user interface 930 is provided to allow additional functional features to a system user of the particular device to which the device engine 860 is coupled. The user interface is coupled to a conflict resolution module 940, a filtering module 945, and a field mapping module 935. Each of the modules provides the functionality both necessary for all synchronization programs, and which users have come to expect.
Filtering module 945 allows filtering for types of content based on, for example, a field level content search. The field mapping module 935 allows for the user to re-map certain interpretations of items which were provided in the document stream. For example, if the device engine 860 is operating on a personal computer, and a synchronization is occurring between the personal computer and a notebook computer, and the user has a “my documents” directory on the personal computer which he wishes to map to a different directory on the notebook computer, the field mapping module 935 allows for this re-mapping to occur. It should be recognized that the field mapping module allows for changes in directing the output of the data package. The field mapping module 935 is not necessary to map particular data fields of, for example, contact information from one application, such as Microsoft Outlook, to a different application, such as Symantec's ACT, as is the traditional use of field mapping and synchronizing applications.
Delta module 950 is further coupled to a compression module 970 and an encryption module 960. It should be recognized that the compression encryption modules need not be enabled. Any type of compression module 970, such as the popular PK Zip or Winzip modules, or those available from HiFn Corporation may be utilized in accordance with the invention. Moreover, any type of encryption algorithms, such as MD5, RCH 6, Two Fish, or Blowfish, or any other symmetric encryption algorithm, may be utilized. In one embodiment of the invention, encryption without compression is used. In a second embodiment of the invention, compression without encryption is used. In a third embodiment of the invention, neither compression or encryption is used, and in a fourth embodiment of the invention, both compression and encryption are used.
Versioning module 915 also allows the device engine 860 to support multiple users with distinct synchronization profiles. This allows multiple users accessing the same machine to each synchronize their own data set using the same device engine. For example, if the application 810 on a particular device comprises Microsoft Outlook on a personal computer, coupled to a Microsoft Exchange server, and Outlook is configured to have multiple user profiles, versioning module 915 will track the data applied through the device engine when a sync request occurs. This allows two users of the same Outlook client software which access different data sets, either in the client computer or on a separate server, to utilize the same device engine and the system of the present invention via the same machine. In a further embodiment, a particular device engine supports the use of foreign devices accessing the system via the same connection. Palm® devices, for example, use a cradle to connect to a computer and/or Internet connection. If a particular user wishes to allow another user to use his Palm® pilot cradle connection to synchronize the other user's Palm® pilot, the device engine can generate data packages to update the local application object store for the foreign device. The application object store can therefore be used as a temporary storage for cases allowing synchronization of foreign devices.
The output of the device engine 900 comprises a data package which is output to storage server 850. As noted above, only one device engine need be connected to the storage server 850 at a given time. The data package can be stored on the storage server 850 until a request is made to a particular location of the storage server by another device engine. Likewise, delta engine 900 can query alternative locations on the storage server for access to synchronized data within the system of the present invention. Access to areas of the storage server is controlled by a management server (MS) described more fully below. In one embodiment, each sync operation requires that the device engine for each device login to the management server to authenticate the device and provide the device engine with the location of the individual device's data packages on the storage server.
Data packages may be advantageously provided to the device engine from the storage server in a streaming format, allowing processing to occur using a minimum of bandwidth and storage in the devices. The device engine 860 and particularly the delta module 950 interpret data packages based on the versioning information and the mirrored data present in the application object store 920. When data is returned to the delta module 950 from the storage server 850, the delta module returns differenced data to the application object 910 for the particular application which then translates the delta information into the particular interface utilized for application 810. Once a device engine has been fully applied all data packages from an input stream, it generates a series of data packages that describe the changes made on the local system. The device engine uses the local application object store 920 to keep track of the last synchronized version of each application's actual data, which is then used for the next data comparison by the delta module on the next sync request. Generated data packages can include operations and encode changes generated from resolving ambiguous cases as described above.
Shown therein are two sync servers 982 and 984 each of which is dedicated to syncing one particular type of application. Sync server 982 is dedicated to the Palm® device, while sync server 980 is dedicated to, for example, a portal application (Portal1).
Since the Palm® Device 804a includes a mechanism for transmitting changes to its data directly, data may be transmitted using HTTP request and response via the firewall 975 to the sync server 982 where differencing and updating of data in the AOS can occur, after which changes can be downloaded to the Palm® 804a.
The synchronization server is an application handles concurrent synchronization of user's data. Each Sync Server includes plug-in support for multiple devices to be synchronized using the same sync server executable. Each device type has it's own device name that identifies which AO/AOS components will be used during the sync.
The sync server uses the concept of a universal data record in its internal sync differencing engine and when sending data to and retrieving from external entities such as the AOS and AO. Hence, in the Palm® application, the job of a server AO is simply to take the device-specific format of its record and convert into a universal record format.
The Sync Server has a plug-in architecture so that 3rd party application partners can easily add their services into the server. Currently, if the server is operated in a Microsoft Windows NT Server, the sync server discovers the sync components via the Windows NT registry. In alternative embodiments, this function is performed in a Component Manger which operates on each sync server to manage processing by each of the AO and AOS on the server. Each AO and AOS are implemented as a stand-alone DLL that the Sync Server loads at initialization time, or when adding a new component via the Component Manager.
Each sync server is shown as dedicated to a single application. However, a sync server may handle multiple device types.
In the embodiment of
Device engines can generate additional data packages intended to resolve synchronization problems in other systems. For example, interfacing with the conflict resolution module 940, if the user makes a change to a particular data store on an application object on his Palm® pilot, then makes an additional change to a personal information manager (PIM) application on his personal computer, the user can specify that the change made on the personal computer will “win” when the conflict is detected by the Δ engine and the versioning information between the two devices. This is essentially a definition that one particular set of data is correct and should replace the second set of data.
As shown in
Each particular application 1040, 1042, 1044 has an associated application object 1010, 1012, 1014. Each of the respective application objects provides data back to delta module 950 in a generic format which is usable by the delta module in accordance with the foregoing description of the apparatus shown in
In operation, during an installation of a device engine into a particular system, the installation program may be tailored to provide application objects which may be present on a given system. For example, and with reference to
Application Object Structure
As noted above, there are different types of server and desktop device engines, some having application objects entirely on the server, while others have application objects entirely on the desktop.
Each application object will include a connector 1110 which may comprise a generic interface to the particular application for which the application object store has been designed. For example, when connecting to a Palm® device, the connector will be an HTTP protocol request routine which interfaces with the Palm® device's own built-in synchronization manager, which provides an output of records which have been changed on the Palm® device. As in
The connector provides access for the application object to remove the data field from a particular application and convert it to a universal record structure. In the desktop AO, where, for example the application object is designed for a Windows interface, the connector may be the Windows API and the job of the AO will be to translate data from, for example, the windows file system to a universal data format. This universal data structure is then used by the delta module 950 to build data packages to be used in synchronization between components of the systems provided in the network system of the present invention.
Universal data structure mapping, used on desktop application objects, and universal data record mapping, used by the server device engines, is further detailed below.
Desktop Application Object
Each Application Object (AO) is a software component that interfaces with the third party application APIs (Application Programming Interface) to provide the programming services to the delta module for extraction and deposition of information data from and to the third party application domain during synchronization. In addition, the AO maps the third party application data fields to system's domain.
The AO service is a collection of COM (Component Object Model) objects that can be developed in conjunction with the third party Windows application APIs as a form of a DLL (Dynamic Linked Library) in C or C++. The DLL is loaded on demand at runtime during synchronization. It should be recognized that the application object need not be implemented using the COM model, but may be developed with other distributed object models.
There are a number of the related subsystems and documents that the developer must be familiar with and this document has made many references to those subsystems during the course of presenting the AO.
Each AO has a COM interface-based design built-in. That is, instead of providing a set of traditional APIs as programming services, it provides a set of interface-based objects as programming services.
StructuredDelta, the delta module, the primary intended user of each AO. StructuredDelta instantiates these COM objects and uses them throughout the synchronization session exclusively through the COM interfaces on those objects to interface with the third party application database.
Each AO component consists of a set of objects that translate the third party application data into the universal data middle format which underpins the entire spectrum of PIM data regardless of which third-party application the data comes from. The objects in universal data format are device, (application) data class, store, folder, item, and data fields. The AO digests the third party application data of any kind and reduces it into a few handful simple objects and field types. These objects and field types are fed into StructuredDelta engine and are compared by StructuredDelta in order of their hierarchy. The resulting differences (add, delete, modify) are logged as transactions in the difference information. The data packs are transported to a storage server that may be actively managed by a management server for each individual user account and devices.
StructuredDelta uses AO objects to access and modify the individual AO objects and data fields. AO objects serve as a buffer between individual application data and StructuredDelta so that StructuredDelta does not require knowledge of each application and database. All AO objects are temporary and created in the space of each AO by StructuredDelta through COM interfaces. AO objects are referenced when they are in use and they are freed when StructuredDelta stops using them. One can think of AO objects as merely placeholders of each application objects for StructuredDelta to access. Once StructuredDelta has a particular Application's data, StructuredDelta would free AO objects immediately without storing them internally.
AppObj
AppObj is a root object of each AO component and there is one and only one per AO. AppObj provides an entry point into the individual application's database. StructuredDelta instantiates it and holds it on during the entire synchronization session and releases it afterward. AppObj offers a number of services such as what class of data it supports. The C++ example of AppObj's definition is shown below:
AppObj can contain children objects. They are Store objects. EnumItems interface is used to enumerate Store objects. FindItem interface is used to find the contained objects. ModifyItem interface enables AppObj to create a new Store object. AppObj is created by StructuredDelta calling CreateAppObject(HWND hWndParent, AppObj **ppObj).
Store
The Store object represents a database of the individual application information. If the individual application can handle multiple databases at same time, one needs multiple Store objects. One can think of Store object as a specialized Folder object, the root folder of each particular application data domain. The C++ example of Store's definition is shown below:
Store is a container of Folder objects. EnumItems interface enables the enumeration of its contained folders while FindItem and FindItemByData interface is used to find contained Folders or Item objects. ModifyItem and ReadWrite interface enables the modification of each application database.
Folder
Folder object is a specific data class of each individual application such as a table in the relational database or a collection of data records in each application. For example, the applications contact collection can be thought as a Folder object. The C++ example of Folder's definition is shown below:
Folder object is also container. It can contain Item objects as well as Folder objects. EnumItem interface allows the enumeration of either Folder objects or Item objects or both. FindItem and FindItemByData interface is used to find contained Folder objects or Item objects. ModifyItem and ReadWrite interface enables the modification of an application's data tables.
Item
Item object represents an individual entity of each application's domain specific data. Item object can be thought as a record of each application's relational table. For example, a contact, email, calendar, to-do item in the particular application can be thought of as an Item object. The C++ example of Item's definition is shown below:
Item can contain Attachment objects only, EnumItems interface enables the enumeration of Attachment objects if any. ModifyItem and ReadWrite interface enables the modification of an application's records or data fields.
Attachment
Attachment object is a specialized Item object that encapsulates an attachment data or relationship. Only Item can have Attachment objects. Attachment object can be thought as attachment data such as attached-email files. Attachment can also be thought as attachment relationship to other Item objects. The example of that is the distribution list (Item object) can contain contacts (Item objects). The C++ example of Item's definition is shown below:
Variant
Variant object represents a data field of each particular application data. For example, a ‘first name’ of a contact or the birthday date of a contact can be thought as Variant object. StructuredDelta only understands Variant object and the types of data fields it encapsulated. Variant object can contain any one of the following data field type:
Variant::tag is an identification tag of data field and variant::flag specifies the type of data field while Variant::value member variable stores each application's field value. One data field type is Collection. Collection object is an array of Variant objects. It can be used to represent a compound data fields.
Another data field type that is worth exploring is Binary. Binary object can be used to represent a binary data as it is.
AO Interfaces
Each AO object has an AO COM interface. Each object must implement some of those interfaces to create certain capability or desired behavior that are expected by StructuredDelta.
IItem
This is the base interface of all application objects. It provides the identification service to StructuredDelta. Every object must have a unique ID, parent unique ID, display name, and item type information (eItemType_FOLDER, eItemType_CONTACT, etc). The unique ID is a unique string only in a given device. It is not persistent cross the Internet to other devices. The ID usually comes from the third party application database domain such a unique ID of a record.
IItemContainer
This is the base interface of all application container objects (store, folder). These container objects must have this interface implemented so that StructuredDelta would recursively descend in them if they have IItemContainer capability.
IErrorMsq
This is an error-reporting interface for every application object. It is used by StructuredDelta to query the error string after a failure. The AO should implement this on every object after the error occurs and before returning the control to StructuredDelta.
IEnumItems
This is an interface for collection enumeration, used by StructuredDelta to enumerate the objects of the third party application database. IEItemEnumFlags (eItemEnumFlags_FOLDER, eItemEnumFlags_ITEM, and eItemEnumFlags_ATTACHMENT) is used to enumerate only the requested type of objects.
IFindItem
This is an interface for recursively finding object within the third party application database, used by StructuredDelta to find application object by its unique ID.
IFindItemByData
This is an interface for recursively finding the object that matches the search criteria data. The search criteria are represented as Collection that allows the multiple search field keys to be used during the search. The multiple objects may be found that match the search criteria. The interface also provides enumeration capability of the search results.
IModifyItem
This is an interface for StructuredDelta to add, delete, and re-parent application data in the third party database during synchronization.
IReadWrite
This is an interface for accessing, writing, and mapping the third party application data fields by StructuredDelta. It provides the capability of read and write data fields from and to the third party application database and the capability of mapping data field of the third party application to universal data format of the system of the present invention. Any object that has data fields and require field level synchronization must implement this interface.
IAppObj
This is an AppObj only interface. It provides the capability of logon and logoff to the third party applications during synchronization. The data class filter mechanism is used by StructuredDelta to filter the enumeration of contained data classes (eDataClass_CONTACT, eDataClass_CALENDAR, etc).
IModuleIdentity
This is an AppObj only interface. It provides DLL module identification information to the Manager object such as the name of the third party application, enum ID of this application, and the application installation detection support.
IItemTypeInfo
This is an AppObj only interface. It provides the information on the number of item types supported by AO, what type items are supported and the capabilities for a specific item type. This returns a DWORD containing bits set.
IDataClassInfo
This is a CAppObj only interface. It provides the information on the number of data classes that are supported by the application object and what the data classes are supported
IDataFileInfo
This is a CAppObj only interface, it provides information on the number of database files and database filenames supported by AO to avoid being synched twice by application sync and file-set sync.
IItemFieldMap
This is a CAppObj only interface that is used by StructuredDelta to query the data fields of given application object. For example, what are data fields in application object called eItemType_CONTACT?
IFolderInfo
This is a CAppObj only interface, used by StructuredDelta to obtain the special and default folders' unique IDs and UUIDs.
IFastSync
This is a CAppObj only interface that is used by StructuredDelta to query if the given AO also provides FastSync service or not. FastSync is a DLL component that is written using the third party APIs and loaded into the third party application to receive the changes in database while users are operating the application. It is used to speed up the synchronization performance by syncing only the objects that are known to IFastSync component.
SynchNotify
This is a CAppObj only interface that is called by Manager to notify the third party application the state of synchronization: start, finished, or reset so that the application can prepare itself accordingly.
Server AO
Server Application Objects share many characteristics with desktop application objects, including support for reading and mapping to the universal record structure set forth above.
Nevertheless, among various devices incorporated into the system of the present invention, each application object database will be quite different. For example, the Palm® database on the device is really just a memory space with records laid out sequentially in memory. In a web portal-type application, the application object may be an Oracle database. Server application objects may generally have less difficult tasks since the applications supported are generally either devices providing their own change data output, (such as Palm®-type PDA's), or which do not have a great deal of data to export (such as cell phones, having only name and number information).
Nevertheless, each application object must support all calls defined in a class interface definition as follows:
As noted above, because each application object database is different, the calling convention and the application object itself will likewise be different. The calling convention for a Palm® device's sync manager application object is given in the following pseudo-code:
As shown therein, the calling convention is designed to be integrated with the Palm's® own sync manager.
A second example provided below shows mapping of a portion of a web portal's contact database:
The above example of mapping the contact field files maps contact fields from a particular web contact information database to fields in the universal record format from the master list header file (pio_types.h) in the system of the present invention. This mapping is for a specific contact table and it should be understood that other information, such as phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and other contact information may be stored in a separate table.
Once data is extracted from a particular application, the server application object must then convert the information into the universal record format which can be utilized by other server device engines to take content information into their own particular application.
Universal Record Format
The universal record format is used by each server device engine to handle various tasks of encapsulating records in a common format, comparing records, creating and holding differences between records, and other tasks of synchronization.
The universal record format allows the application objects to support a wide range of extensible application item types such as contacts, calendar, mail, bookmarks, and the like. Flexible type name and value associations permit synchronization without regard to individual vendor application information formats. Each application object encapsulates mapped knowledge from the vendor unique format to the universal format of the present invention. As such, an application object can be designed to support any combination of application and binary information types. In essence, application objects can be designed to support a vendor application using only binary file synchronization if the internal format of the application is not known.
Server application objects can also be designed to create collections. For example, if the user wishes to create a “my pictures” collection which consists of some collection of information and synchronize this collection of information, such an arbitrary grouping of classes of information into appropriate representations is supported.
Because the connector layer of the interfaces to the actual storage with a vendor application varies with application type, application access methods can include, but are not limited to, disk or database access, network protocols, wireless device protocols, and the like.
The Universal Records Format and the Universal Field Format class definitions are given below:
The UniversalField Structure
An example of how data is removed from one particular application data type and converted into the universal record format is given below for an Oracle database:
While the above-identified code is specific to, for example, an Oracle database, one of average skill in the art will readily recognize that the technique utilized above may be adapted to other types of databases containing records and fields of interest. In the above code examples, all fields which are mapped from a particular application are mapped to fields in the master mapping file.
Management Server
In order to provide security and identification of particular users in an Internet-implemented synchronization system, a management server may be provided in the system of the present invention. The management server is a centralized server which controls behavior and characteristics of the entire network of device engines across all users.
The management server communicates using hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) which may be implemented with a secure sockets layer (SSL) to ensure security.
In particular, the management server supports an authentication interface that requires each device engine to authenticate with the management server before performing synchronization. Certain storage server implementations may utilize locking semantics to control read and write access to storage for multiple device engines. For example, in a generic FTP request, if two device engines attempt to connect to the same data at the same time, there must be some form of locking control to prevent device engines accessing the same data at the same time. In this instance, the management server controls the device engine acquisition, renewal, and releasing of locks against data stored in the network.
Each device engine is uniquely identified and tracked by the management server. This allows for tailoring behavior between the management server and specific types of storage systems and device engine components. All device engine components are tagged and version stamped for management via the management server.
Device actions can request updated copies of individual device engine components, permitting self-update and configuration of device engine systems. This permits minimal download designs for device engines that are on low bandwidth connections enabling the device engines to download additional required components at a later time.
In a further aspect of the system, a value added component may be provided where the management server can support client's advertising mechanisms, enabling the display of banner or similar advertising on a device engine system without the need for a web browser. Cycling of advertisements, statistic collection, and the like, are managed via management server protocols. Online purchase and subscription mechanisms are also supported using the management server protocol.
The management server further supports the accounting, sign-up registration, device edition, storage server selection, and similar functions for each user in the system. In one embodiment, the management server may retain password and encryption information for a given user account. In a second embodiment, such information is not retained. The second embodiment provides the advantage that users may feel more secure if the maintainer of the management server is not in possession of the password to access data in the user's account.
Further information with respect to the management server and the data flow from the management server to other components of the system of the present invention will become apparent with respect to the discussion of the process flow and data flow diagrams in
As shown in
As indicated in
Once an account is authenticated and confirmed, the administrator of the system of the present invention having a private data store at 1770 may choose to provide a web desktop 1754 which allows access to a user's records such as file 1756, e-mail 1758, calendar 1760, contacts 1762, notes 1764, and tasks 1766. The information will be culled from a provider database 1752 which will be synched in accordance with the system of the present invention as previously described. In essence, the provider database 1752 accesses data from the device engines 1780, which include, as discussed above, the storage server, each individual device engine 1785, and a settings database 1787.
Other portions of the management server include the locking modules for beginning a sync 1732, continuing a sync 1734, and ending a sync 1736, and for updating user information including modifying a user 1742, adding devices 1744, removing devices 1746, and modifying devices 1748.
Storage Server
Shown in
One or more storage servers 1415 may be used to communicate transaction amongst a collection of devices. Each user's personal information network is represented by a unique account within its own data package storage section. The storage server 1415 maintains persistent store collection of data packages which is, at a minimum, enough data packages to be capable of synchronizing the most out-of-date system in a user's given information network or add information to new devices which are provided in the network. Additional data packages can be maintained to permit rollback of previous versions of information. The storage server can automatically dispose of older data package storage and can support aging of an inactive accounts.
Each storage server 1415 may be implemented using a variety of implementations including a standard FTP server for any operating system platform. The storage server can be implemented using HTTP protocols for increased efficiency and firewall avoidance. The storage server may be implemented using techniques for local storage such as database access or single file storage of a user's entire file system tree. The storage server 1415 may utilize the stored foreign protocol model for moving copies of data packages to other storage servers in the system. In one embodiment, the storage server can allow tunneling of information using an alternative protocol to other storage servers in cases where firewall prevents originating protocol. For example, a storage server can relay an FTP traffic inside an HTTP protocol. Storage servers may include their own locking semantics to arbitrate multiple device engine access to the same server without the need for a separate management server. Each device engine can access only a specific user's data package storage area even though the storage server 1415 may maintain a larger number of data packages across a large number of users. This allows for increased scaling when the storage server is implemented using file system techniques.
In one aspect, the storage server is implemented using standard FTP or HTTP connections for each operation. HTTP is composed of request response pairs. All requests are supposed to be posting commands. Parameters can be set in the form known as “application/X-WWW-form-URLENCODED”. The encoding is specified as in RFC1866. Functions for the storage server include testing if the storage server can reach other users which will retrieve a simple text string, a “get” command which transfers the contents of a file as in a binary stream of byes; a put command as a binary stream of data to the storage server, a directory listing command, a remove command, a rename command, an exist command, and the like.
Pull Synchronization
A pull synchronization as illustrated in
Each device has its own triggering mechanism for initiating synchronization. Some devices, such as Windows clients and Palm® pilots are triggered manually when the user presses a “sync” button. Other devices, such as a cellular telephone, may be triggered automatically after another device completes a sync. Regular, time-based triggers are supported as well. A web-based application portal will sync when a user logs into the website security authorization mechanism, and may optionally sync on a log-out of the user or on the session time-out, but only if the user has changed data during the session.
For each sync, the triggering event specifies which application types are to sync for the device. This enables a triggering event to trigger only a sync for a particular application type. The management server can specify that no sync is needed for a particular type of application to minimize traffic to the storage server. Syncs may be triggered via an HTTP request to the server. This request holds information about which device to sync and the user log-in information is bounced to the management server for authorization and validation. Syncs may be triggered by sending an HTTP request to the server and passing the authentication information in the data portion of the request to the management server. Each device may include a servlet that is responsible for retrieving the request and ensuring its proper format before passing the synchronization request on to the server.
The device name and device class uniquely identify a particular device type that is being synchronized, and is contained in the management server. Each user has one or more device entries in the management server authorization records and each device name is unique for this user's space. For example, if a user has five devices with his or her own personal identification number, there will be five authorization records. There may be two Windows devices, two different Palm® devices and a web service portal, each having their own personal identification number.
As shown in
If a new version of the data exists, the device engine will retrieve the difference information at step 1435 “to get Δ.”
Once a Δ is retrieved, conflicts are resolved at step 1450. The resolve conflicts step allows a user to resolve conflicts to multiple types of data which have been changed on both the server portion of the device and in the local data.
Once the conflicts have been resolved at step 1450, the Δ's are applied at step 1455. The apply Δ step 1455 allows for filters and mappings to be accounted for on the local device engine side of the system. As shown at steps 1460, 1465, 1470, and 1475, the Δ may include updates at the item level 1460, application level 1465, device level 1470, or network level 1475. In each of the aforementioned steps, a loop back to the Δ retrieval step 1435 is provided. When no further Δ's are available, the management server lock is released at step 1440.
The foregoing description of a pull synchronization is further described in the following pseudo-code:
Push Synchronization
Once the Δ's for a given application have been created, the method of the present invention continues at step 1540, which enables a connection to a storage server. Upon connection to the storage server, a further connection to management server 1545 will occur to authenticate the user in the system. Failure at any of the aforementioned points will result in returning to idle state 1505. Upon authentication, a management server lock is enabled to ensure that multiple device engines do not connect to the same data at the same time.
Once a lock is acquired at step 1555, Δ's are uploaded to the system. As shown, this may include uploading an item Δ 1575, an application Δ 1570, uploading a device Δ 1565, or a network Δ 1560. Once Δ's have been uploaded to the server, management lock server 1580 is released, and the connection to the storage server is terminated at step 1585.
It should be recognized that such a push synchronization need not occur directly to a server, but may occur directly to a second device engine in accordance with the depiction of the multiple embodiments of the invention in
Data Package Specification
Once information is provided into the universal data format, the device engine organizes the format into a data package. Each data package thus includes a description of changes to any and all information for particular application, and a collection of data packages describes changes across all device engines including all different types of data. With encoding and compression, data packages can become very compact to minimize bandwidth and storage requirements across the system of the present invention.
In one particular aspect of the present invention, encoding of the data packages may be provided in a streaming format to allow processing by the device engines with minimal storage and memory configuration at the device engine level.
The device engine can read the stream and determine which records from which applications it needs to update the particular information present on the system on which it resides.
Data packages can be provided in a binary data format. This allows data packages to encode changes to non-application data at a bite level. Hence, if a single bit on a system changes, the system of the present invention allows synchronization of that bit on another system. Changes are described as a sequence of bite-level change operations. One such encoding is using a sequence of insert and copy operations. Insert and copy operations generally define a particular “insertion” of a number of bites from a source file, then how many bites of a changed source file must be inserted to a particular file, then how many bites to insert from a particular new file, with a differencing engine taking the bites in the stream and inserting them into the new file to create the new version of the file.
As will be readily understood by one of average skill in the art, this allows a user to, for example, change a binary file such as a word processing document or other type of attachment, and synchronize such an attachment at the binary level. Specifically, if one forwards an e-mail of a word document to a second individual, the second individual modifies it and wishes to return this document with modifications to the first individual, because the first individual has the original file on his system, if both systems are enabled in the system of the present invention, the second system need only send the changes or the difference information back to the first system in order for the first system to reconstruct the document on the second system using this change data to create the document as intended by the second user.
Multiple caching of both the generation and application of data packages can be utilized to deal with communication issues in accordance with the system of the present invention. It should be further recognized that data packages can be merged into larger meta-data packages. Such meta-data information, such as the organization of multiple device packages, may be encoded into a larger system package. Each system package is essentially an encoded sequence of data packages.
Particular examples of item fields 1260 which may be included for any given item 1250 are shown in
The data format also contains folder information 1240 which allows the classification of items and consequently their associated item fields into particular categories.
Application objects 1230 include information on the types of applications from which information in the stream is included. Device objects 1220 include information on the origin type of device which the information is originating from. Network objects 1210 include information on a user level to define that the information in the data stream is coming from a particular user.
As detailed above, each application object supports a folder store interface that permits management of collections of information on a folder level, and permits management of folder hierarchies of information. The application object also includes an item interface that permits management of individual information entries such as records or files or components of information entries such as fields within records. Each application object further supports an interface for detection of a vendor application.
A DataPack essentially contains a sequence of transactions describing changes to information. This information can span two basic types: structured or application data, and unstructured or binary file data.
Transactions are encoded using an efficient streaming format with tags to represent the actual content objects. This technique permits the continuous extension of the DataPack format as new content is supported.
The general architecture of the package provides for transactions, application data, file data, files, objects and identifiers to be carried in the data package. Generally, transactions, application data, file data, and files have previously been described.
The first portion of the data package will be the data package identifier. Each transaction has a basic architecture of objects and operations. Each piece of content is referred to as an object and is uniquely represented with a Universally Unique Identifier (UUID). Objects typically are represented by a dynamically generated UUID, but more common objects are represented by static UUIDs. The following static UUIDs are defined:
Each UUID has a unique 128 bit value which may be assigned by the system provider.
Transactions are broken down into manageable blocks in the form of individual files. These files are then optionally compressed and encrypted and prefixed with appropriate headers. Transactions are grouped into specific files based on the following rules:
A DataPack file is identified using specific rules based on the file name. The file name is of the form “UUID.VER” where UUID is the identifier for the specific object and VER is the transaction version number. The version number is of the form “D0001” with additional digits used for large version numbers. The “D000” value may be reserved for the base version for the object.
The UUID for the user account is generated by the Management Server (MS). The MS also maintains a current table of UUID values and version numbers that provides the root structure for understanding the DataPack files within a user account. The MS also provides necessary locking semantics needed to maintain consistency when multiple device engines attempt to synchronize.
All DataPacks are prefixed with a standardized header that provides basic content information regarding the DataPack. Compression and encryption headers follow the DataPack header if needed.
The data package header information will include version signature, applied versioning information, content type, A engine type, compression type, encryption type, applied size, encrypted size, compressed size, raw data size, and other data useful for the device engine in decrypting the data stream to provide the data into a format usable for the application.
The header may optimally have the format:
The following ContentType values are permissible:
The DeltaType encodes the type of binary file differencing used. The following DeltaType values are permissible using DataPackageDeltaType:
The compression type specifies whether the DataPack has been compressed. A DataPack compression header follows the DataPack header if a compression type is specified. The following CompressionType values are permissible using DataPackageCompressionType:
The encryption type specifies whether the DataPack has been encrypted. A DataPack encryption header follows the DataPack header if an encryption type is specified. The following EncryptionType values are permissible using DataPackageEncryptionType:
All DataPack compression headers are encoded using the following format:
The following HeaderType values are permissible using DataPackageHeaderType:
All DataPack encryption headers are encoded using the following format:
The data package transaction format may take a number of forms. One example is the following:
The following Operation values are permissible using the Operation class:
The following FieldDataType values are permissible using cIDataType:
Data package objects are organized into a hierarchy as follows:
An account is the root structure, which identifies information about the user's account. It may have exemplary field tags (eFieldTag_[NAME]) such as Name, Password, UserName and Version. The FieldTag ItemType value is specified as ItemType_PIN using enumItemType.
A device is a system identified as part of an account. Examples include PCs, handhelds, Web sites, and so on. It may have tags (eFieldTag_[Name]) such as: “name” and “type” and item type values (eDevice_[Name]) such as Portal, Palm, Windows, CellPhone.
A data class is a grouping of similar information types. Many data classes may be represented for a particular account. The data class may contain field tags (eFieldTag_[Name]) such as: Name; ItemType; SubType; IsManaged; Provider; Filter and Version.
The following ItemType values are permissible using enumDataClass (eDataClass_[Name]):
A Provider is the application that maintains specific information within a data class. There can be more than one provider for a particular data class. Field tags include: Name, AppObjID, Password, Username and Version. Examples of provider tags permissible for the provider (eProvider[Name]) include: Portal, Palm®, MicrosoftOutlook®, Lotus Organizer, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Windows, and so on.
Data stores are the containers for storing information within a provider. There can be more than one data store for a particular provider. Folders represent structural organization of information within a data store. Data stores are not required to support folders. Tags (eFieldTag_[Name]) supported for each data store include: Name, ItemType, IsManaged and OriginalPath. Item types permissible for the data store include: unknown; Folder; MAPI; Database and Store_File.
Folders represent structural organization of information within a data store. Data stores are not required to support folders. A folder is represented by a UUID and may contain any of the following field tags (eFieldTag_[Name]): Name; ItemType; IsManaged; FileAttributes; CreationDate; ModificationDate; AccessDate; SpecialFolderType.
The eFieldTag_ItemType value is specified as eItemType_FOLDER using enumItemType.
Items are individual informational components consisting of the actual user data. They may contain field tags such as: Name, ItemType, IsManaged, and Version.
File items typically have the following additional field tags (eFieidTag_[Name]):
Item types may take the format (eItemType_[Name]) and may include: extended; folder; attachment; contact; distlist; email; calendar; task; call; note; post; journal; form; script; rule; favorites; subscription; common_favorites; desktop; common_desktop; startmenu; common_startmenu; channels; cookies; programs; common_programs; startup; common_startup; sendto; recent; internet_cache; history; mapped_drives; printers; docs; doctemplates; fonts; window_settings; app_data_folder; app_settings; fileset; pin; device; data_store; file; provider; and data_class; internal.
A field is based on one of a set of base type definitions. All field tag information is encoded using the following format:
A number of Field types are possible, including: unknown; long; dword; date; string; binary; float; double; collection; uniqueid; qword; uuid; file; invalid. LONG is a four byte value encoded in big-endian format. FieldType DWORD is a four byte value encoded in big-endian format. FieldType String is a sequence of Unicode characters followed by a single NULL byte. Interfaces are provided with an MBCS value. FieldType Binary is a sequence of bytes. FieldType UniqueID is a sequence of bytes as defined by the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) standard. AO interfaces are provided with a Locally Unique Identifier (LUID) value FieldType QWORD is an eight byte value encoded in big-endian format. FieldType File is a UUID that references a separate DataPack containing the file body data. AO interfaces are provided with a sequence of Unicode characters followed by a single NULL byte that describes the full path name for the file.
Any number of filed sub types are possible. Each of the sub-types includes all of the possible data types from all of the supported user applications. As should be well understood, the possibilities in the number of sub-types is quite large, and dynamic as each new application supported by the system of the present invention is added. Examples of sub-types include:
The aforementioned invention provides a user-centric model of communication to deliver personal information via network services. This model accommodates devices that are disconnected from the network, such as the Internet, at various times. Personal information can continue to exist locally rather than imposing a server-centric model on existing information.
In accordance with the foregoing, a store and forward information broadcast is utilized. Changes to existing information are replicated to an Internet storage server and changes are then retrieved by other devices on the network at device-specific times. In this manner, direct client communication is accomplished without requiring one-to-one communication. While one communication is supported by the system of the present invention, it need not be required.
Although the present invention has been presented in the form of an Internet store and forward broadcast for the purposes of synchronizing personal information amongst various types of devices, it will be readily recognized that synchronization need not be accomplished as the only application for the aforementioned system. In particular, the system can be utilized to efficiently broadcast changes to information in so-called “push” type information applications where only portions of the data need to be changed on a client application. For example, in a system where information such as changes in a stock price need to be broadcast to a plurality of users, a client application implementing the aforementioned technology can be updated by only changing specific portions of the data in the client application relative to that particular stock price. This can be done using a smaller bandwidth than has previously been determined with other devices.
The many objects and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to one of average skill in the art. All such objects and advantages are intended to be within the scope of the invention as defined by the written description and drawings presented herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/659,646, filed Sep. 10, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,486, entitled DATA TRANSFER AND SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM USING CHANGE LOGS which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/491,694 U.S. Pat. No. 6,671,757, filed Jan. 26, 2000, entitled DATA TRANSFER AND SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4887212 | Zamora et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 5111398 | Nunberg et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5115466 | Presttun | May 1992 | A |
| 5130993 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5146221 | Whiting et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5329619 | Page et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5392390 | Crozier | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5418854 | Kaufman et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5418908 | Keller et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5425079 | Noda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5483352 | Fukuyama | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485161 | Vaughn | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5519433 | Lappington et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519606 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5543789 | Behr et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544061 | Morimoto et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5561446 | Montlick | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574906 | Morris | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579489 | Dornier et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5588009 | Will | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592470 | Rudrapatna et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5623406 | Ichbiah | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623661 | Hon | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5628005 | Hurvig | May 1997 | A |
| 5630081 | Rybicki et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5638508 | Kanai et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640577 | Scharmer | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5644709 | Austin | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5647002 | Brunson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649195 | Scott et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5650800 | Benson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657372 | Ahlberg | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666397 | Lamons et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5666553 | Crozier | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5682524 | Freund et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684990 | Boothby | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694596 | Campbell | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699255 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701423 | Crozier | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706509 | Man-Hak Tso | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710922 | Alley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5727202 | Kucala | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727950 | Cook et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729735 | Meyering | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729739 | Cantin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742792 | Yanai et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745750 | Porcaro | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745906 | Squibb | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5757920 | Misra et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758150 | Bell et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758354 | Huang et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758355 | Buchanan | May 1998 | A |
| 5764899 | Eggleston et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768480 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768597 | Simm | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771354 | Crawford | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778346 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778361 | Nanjo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778367 | Wesinger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778388 | Kawamura et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781901 | Kuzma | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787247 | Norin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787262 | Shakib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5794228 | French et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5804803 | Cragun et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809497 | Freund et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812773 | Norin | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812793 | Shakib et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818437 | Grover et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826245 | Sandberg-Diment | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832489 | Kucala | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832518 | Mastors | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832519 | Bowen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832520 | Miller | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845283 | Williams et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859973 | Carpenter | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864864 | Lerner | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5875296 | Shi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5884323 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884325 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893119 | Squibb | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5896321 | Miller | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897640 | Veghte et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897642 | Capossela et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903723 | Beck et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907793 | Reams | May 1999 | A |
| 5923756 | Shambroom | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923848 | Goodhand et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926816 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933653 | Ofek | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5933778 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5933816 | Zeanah et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935262 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937405 | Campbell | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941944 | Messerly | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943676 | Boothby | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944787 | Zoken | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5946615 | Holmes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948066 | Whalen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951636 | Zerber | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961572 | Craport et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5961590 | Mendez et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968131 | Mendez et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970149 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970490 | Morgenstern | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971277 | Cragun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974238 | Chase, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974563 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987381 | Oshizawa | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987609 | Hasebe | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995118 | Masuda | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6000000 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006215 | Retallick | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006274 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009462 | Birrell et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012063 | Bodnar | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012088 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014695 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016394 | Walker | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016478 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6023620 | Harisson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023708 | Mendez et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023723 | McCormick et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038665 | Bolt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044381 | Boothby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049776 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058399 | Morag et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061790 | Bodnar | May 2000 | A |
| 6061796 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063134 | Peters et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6064880 | Alanara | May 2000 | A |
| 6065018 | Beier et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073133 | Chrabaszcz | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076109 | Kikinis | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078960 | Ballard | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6081900 | Subramaniam et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6094618 | Harada | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101480 | Conmy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108330 | Bhatia et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115797 | Kanda et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131096 | Ng et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131116 | Riggins et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141011 | Bodnar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141621 | Piwowarski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141659 | Barker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141664 | Boothby | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6145088 | Stevens | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148260 | Musk et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151606 | Mendez | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157630 | Adler et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163773 | Kishi | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163779 | Mantha et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163844 | Duncan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167120 | Kikinis | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173310 | Yost et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173311 | Hassett et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182117 | Christie et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182141 | Blum et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6189030 | Kirsch et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6189096 | Haverty | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195695 | Cheston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195794 | Buxton | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6202085 | Benson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6205448 | Kruglikov et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209034 | Gladwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212529 | Boothby et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212556 | Arunachalam | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216131 | Liu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219680 | Bernardo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219694 | Lazaridis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223187 | Boothby et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226650 | Mahajan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233565 | Lewis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233589 | Balcha et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243760 | Armbruster et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246889 | Boltz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247048 | Greer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247135 | Feague | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249690 | Mashiko | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252547 | Perry et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255989 | Munson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6256750 | Takeda | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260124 | Crockett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272545 | Flanagin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275831 | Bodnar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278941 | Yokoyama | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282435 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282698 | Baker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285889 | Nykanen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286029 | Delph | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286053 | Van Peursem et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286085 | Jouenne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289212 | Stein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292743 | Pu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292905 | Wallach et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295502 | Hancock et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295541 | Bodnar et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6304881 | Halim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317755 | Rakers et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321236 | Zollinger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324467 | Machii et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324526 | D'Agostino | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324544 | Alam et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327533 | Chou | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6329680 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330568 | Boothby et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332158 | Risley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6333973 | Smith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6338096 | Ukelson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339710 | Suzuki | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6341316 | Kloba et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345308 | Abe | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349336 | Sit et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353448 | Scarborough et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356910 | Zellweger | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356961 | Oprescu-Surcobe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360252 | Rudy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360330 | Mutalik et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363249 | Nordeman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363412 | Niwa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6374250 | Ajtai et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381700 | Yoshida | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389462 | Cohen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396482 | Griffin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397307 | Ohran | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6397351 | Miller et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6401104 | LaRue et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405218 | Boothby | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6418309 | Moon et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434621 | Pezzillo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434627 | Millet et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437818 | Ludwig et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449622 | LaRue et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453392 | Flynn, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457062 | Pivowar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460036 | Herz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6462644 | Howell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463464 | Lazaridis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466967 | Landsman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6473621 | Heie | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480896 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484143 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487560 | LaRue et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490655 | Kershaw | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496944 | Hsiao et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499108 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505216 | Schutzman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507891 | Challenger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6516314 | Birkler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6516327 | Zondervan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6519452 | Agostino et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523063 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523079 | Kikinis et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6532588 | Porter | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535743 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539494 | Abramson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542933 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546425 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6549933 | Barrett et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553375 | Huang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553410 | Kikinis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553413 | Leighton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6564336 | Majkowski | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567850 | Freishtat et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567857 | Gupta et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6581065 | Rodkin et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584454 | Hummel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589290 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591266 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591306 | Redlich | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591362 | Li | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597700 | Golikeri et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6601143 | Lamparter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6609005 | Chern | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6628194 | Hellebust et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6640302 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643707 | Booth | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6647399 | Zaremba | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654746 | Wong et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6662212 | Chandhok et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665721 | Hind et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671724 | Pandya et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671757 | Multer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6684206 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6684302 | Kershaw | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6694335 | Hopmann et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6694336 | Multer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701316 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704849 | Steegmans | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6714987 | Amin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718348 | Novak et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6718390 | Still et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6725239 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728530 | Heinonen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6732101 | Cook | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6732264 | Sun et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6738789 | Multer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741851 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745040 | Zimmerman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757696 | Multer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757698 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757712 | Bastian et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6781575 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6795848 | Border et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6799214 | Li | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6804690 | Dysert et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6804783 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6810411 | Coughlin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6812961 | Parulski et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6813487 | Trommelen | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6816481 | Adams et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829654 | Jungck | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6836657 | Ji et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6836765 | Sussman | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6839022 | Benco et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6839568 | Suzuki | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6842695 | Tu | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850944 | MacCall et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6868451 | Peacock | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6870921 | Elsey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6886013 | Beranek | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6892225 | Tu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892245 | Crump et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6904460 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6920488 | Le Pennec et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6925476 | Multer | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6925477 | Champagne et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934767 | Jellinek | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6944651 | Onyon et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6944676 | Armbruster et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6954660 | Aoyama | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6954783 | Bodwell et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6959331 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6963914 | Breitbart et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6973299 | Apfel | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6996617 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6996631 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003555 | Jungck | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003668 | Berson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007041 | Multer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7010578 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7016964 | Still et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7023868 | Rabenko et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7030730 | Zondervan | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7035878 | Multer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039656 | Tsai et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051275 | Gupta et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054594 | Bloch et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054952 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7082476 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7085817 | Tock et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7096418 | Singhal et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7099915 | Tenereillo et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103794 | Malcolm et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107043 | Aoyama | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7110954 | Yung et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116681 | Hovell et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7146161 | Chou | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158805 | Park et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7159036 | Hinchliffe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7162494 | Arellano | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167728 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7181628 | Sato et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7197574 | Ishiyama | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7233791 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7237027 | Raccah et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7249175 | Donaldson | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7269433 | Vargas et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7284051 | Okano et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7289964 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7293074 | Jellinek et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7315826 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7317907 | Linkert et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328341 | Eun et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7343568 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349719 | Buniatyan | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356559 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7363233 | Levine | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7383061 | Hawkins | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7392034 | Westman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7415486 | Multer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7440746 | Swan | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7447743 | Jordan, Jr. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7454500 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7499888 | Tu et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7505762 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519702 | Allan | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7539697 | Akella et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7587398 | Fredricksen et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7596609 | Refuah et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7663652 | Reese | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7707150 | Sundararajan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7853664 | Wang et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 8010095 | Natsuno et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8224308 | Gavrylyako et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 20010014893 | Boothby | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028363 | Nomoto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034737 | Cane et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044805 | Multer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047393 | Arner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047471 | Johnson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051920 | Joao et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056473 | Arneson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007303 | Brookler et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010868 | Nakashima et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016818 | Kirani et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016912 | Johnson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032751 | Bharadwaj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040369 | Multer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049852 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055909 | Fung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056011 | Nardone et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059116 | Bulatovic et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062365 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067816 | Bushnell | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069178 | Hoffman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073212 | Sokol et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078075 | Colson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082995 | Christie | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083325 | Mediratta et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091785 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116444 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120600 | Schiavone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128908 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138582 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138765 | Fishman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152278 | Pontenzone et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162011 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168964 | Kraft | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030021274 | Siikaniemi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028451 | Ananian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028554 | Koskimies et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037020 | Novak et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061163 | Durfield | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065934 | Angelo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069874 | Hertzog et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084121 | De Boor et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134625 | Choi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135463 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139172 | Lampela et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204568 | Bhargava et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208546 | Desalvo et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224760 | Day | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229898 | Babu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233383 | Koskimies | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040054746 | Shibata | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093317 | Swan | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093342 | Arbo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093385 | Yamagata | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111465 | Chuang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120477 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040132428 | Mulligan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142711 | Mahonen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148408 | Nadarajah | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162830 | Shirwadkar et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192260 | Sugimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192282 | Vasudevan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193953 | Callahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204120 | Jiles | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224665 | Kokubo | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235523 | Schrire et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267390 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267944 | Britt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021571 | East | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032527 | Sheha et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038863 | Onyon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044404 | Bhansali et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054354 | Roman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060392 | Goring et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064859 | Kotzin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086296 | Chi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086318 | Aubault | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090253 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096975 | Moshe | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099963 | Multer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100150 | Dhara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102257 | Onyon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114470 | Bal | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131990 | Jewell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144200 | Hesselink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144251 | Slate | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203971 | Koskimies et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203992 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204001 | Stein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210101 | Janik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216300 | Appelman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227674 | Kopra et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240494 | Cue et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273632 | Kawakami | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060021059 | Brown et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035647 | Eisner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052091 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095397 | Torres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190626 | Bhogal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199599 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212482 | Celik | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233335 | Pfleging et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288112 | Soelberg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070047533 | Criddle et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050734 | Busey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053335 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056043 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061331 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070082668 | Silver et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094042 | Ramer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220419 | Stibel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226272 | Huang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005282 | Gaedcke | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009268 | Ramer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022220 | Cheah | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039020 | Eskin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051071 | Vishwanathan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059897 | Dilorenzo | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064378 | Kahan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082421 | Onyon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089299 | Lindsley et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201362 | Multer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294768 | Sampson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012940 | Ives et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037828 | Waite et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138546 | Cruzada | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327305 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1202662 | Dec 1998 | CN |
| 1455522 | Nov 2003 | CN |
| 1313697 | Feb 2005 | CN |
| 2003-122958 | Jul 2006 | CN |
| 0801487 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0836131 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0836301 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0924917 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0930593 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 1024441 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 0986225 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1139608 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1180890 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1263244 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1998-106683 | Dec 1998 | FR |
| 2366050 | Jun 2001 | GB |
| 7303146 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 10191453 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 11242620 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 11242677 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 2000232680 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000316053 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2002142254 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002185575 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002247144 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002314689 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003259011 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| WO 9704391 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9739564 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9741520 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9803005 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO 9821648 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9829994 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 9854662 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9856159 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9905813 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9906900 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9936870 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 9940514 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9945451 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9945484 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9946701 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9950761 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 9965256 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0011832 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0016222 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0029998 | May 2000 | WO |
| 0133874 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0171539 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0180535 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 0217140 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 03-083716 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005112586 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Finnigan, Anne, “The Safe Way to Shop Online,” Sep. 1998, p. 162, Good Housekeeping, v. 227 No. 3. |
| Chase, Larry, “Taking Transactions Online,” Oct. 1998, pp. 124-132, Target Marketing, v.21 No. 10. |
| Gong, Li, “Increasing Availability and Security of an Authentication Service,” Jun. 1993, pp. 657-662, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, v. 11 No. 5. |
| DeMaio, Harry B., “My MIPS Are Sealed,” Sep./Oct. 1993, pp. 46-51, Chief Information Officer Journal, v. 5 iss.7. |
| Anonymous: “Download filter for MMS”, Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB, vol. 457, No. 28, May 1, 2002, XP007130322, ISSN: 0374-4353. |
| Intellisync Email Accelerator, A detailed guide to functionality-Product functionality paper, Mar. 2004, pp. 1-18. |
| Lee et al, “Monitoring Data Archives for Grid Environments,” Jul. 2002, 10 pgs. |
| Batista et al. “Mining Web Access Logs of an On-line Newspaper” Jul. 2002, 8 pgs http://ectrl.itc.it/rpec/. |
| Internet Mail Consortium: :vCard Overview, Oct. 13, 1998, 3 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: www.imc.org/pdi/vcardoverview. |
| Internet Mail Consortium: :vCard The Electronic Business Card, Jan. 1, 1997, 5 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: www.imc.org/pdi/vcardwhite.html. |
| Jennings, J. “SyncML DM: A SyncML Protocol for Device Management,” slide presentation, downloaded from www.openalliance.org/tech/affiliates/syncml/syncmldm—28jan02—james—jennings.pdf, Jan. 28, 2002, 23 pgs. |
| Torio, T. “The SyncML Road Ahead—Application Development and Device Management,” slide presentation, downloaded from www.openalliance.org/tech/affiliates/syncml/syncmldm—30jan02 —teemu—Toroi.pdf, Jan. 30, 2002. |
| Sheha, M.A.et al. “Specification and Drawings of U.S. Appl. No. 60/493,704,” filed Aug. 8, 2003. |
| Luu, Le Hien, Examiner Group Art Unit 2141,Notice of allowance dated Apr. 8, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/659,646, filed Sep. 10, 2003. |
| FusionOne “FusionOne Unveils Integrated Carrier Product Suite to Deliver Mobility Solutions to Individuals and the Enterprise,” Press Release, Mar. 18, 2002, 3 pgs. |
| FusionOne “FusionOne Unveils Mighty Phone™ Wireless Service,” Press Release,Nov. 18, 2002, 3 pgs. |
| Business Wire, “SyncML Announces 18 New Compliant Products, SyncML DM Engineering Event Held; 99 Devices No Certified SyncML Compliant,” Press Release, Sep. 25, 2002. |
| Reed, Benjamin C., et al.,“Authenticating Network-Attached Storage,” IEEE, Jan.-Feb. 2000, pp. 49-57. |
| Gaskin, J.E.:Messaging-Instant Enterprise—Once a Novelty item, IM is Becoming a More Serious Tool for Business Users, InternetWeek, No. 810, Apr. 24, 2000, p. 55. |
| BusinessWire, “FusionOne Partners with WhitePages.com to Deliver Automatic Synchronization for Online Subscriber,” press release, Oct. 11, 2000. |
| Pabla, C.“SyncML Intensive,” downloaded from www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/wireless/library/we-syncml2, Apr. 1, 2002. |
| Malone, et al., Semi-Structured Messages are Surprisingly Useful for Computer-Supported Coordination', Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Austin, Texas, Dec. 3-5, 1986, pp. 1-26. |
| Patel et al.,“The Multimedia Fax-MIME Gateway,” 8440 IEEE MultiMedia No. 4, Jan. 1994, 7 pgs. |
| Lamb et al., “LAN-Based Office for the Enterprise, A Case Study,” Advantis Company, White Plains, NY 10605, Jan. 1994 IEEE, pp. 440-447. |
| Starfish, “TrueSync Data Synchronization,” Software, http://www.starfishsoftware.com/solutions/data/data.html, Jan. 2003. |
| Rou et al., “Online File Storage System,” 2002 Student Conference on Research and Development Proceedings, Shah Alam, Malaysia, Nov. 7, 2002, IEEE, pp. 83-86. |
| Agarwal et al., “On the Scalability of Data Synchronization Protocols for PDAs and Mobile Devices,” Jul. 2002, IEEE Network, pp. 22-28. |
| Nguyen, Phong H., Examiner Group Art Unit # 2162, non-final Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,609, 33 pgs. |
| Advisory Action dated Sep. 26, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,609, filed Feb. 26, 2008, David L. Multer. |
| Nguyen, Phong H., United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jul. 20, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,609, 24 pgs. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,609, filed Feb. 26, 2008, Applicant: David L. Multer, 27 pages. |
| “Secure Hash Algorithm”, Wikipedia, accessed Feb. 28, 2012, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure—Hash—Algorithm>. |
| Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,609, filed Feb. 26, 2008, David L. Multer, (27 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090055464 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10659646 | Sep 2003 | US |
| Child | 12228978 | US | |
| Parent | 09491694 | Jan 2000 | US |
| Child | 10659646 | US |
