Data transmission and rendering techniques by a device via a network

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10091335
  • Patent Number
    10,091,335
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 6, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 2, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A technique is disclosed for generating formatted information for display on a computing device. The computing device may be configured to include at least one interface for communicating with a server computing device. A request is sent from the computing device to the server system. According to one embodiment, the request may correspond to an HTTP request for information relating to a specific HTML page or web page. A response is then received from the server system. According to one embodiment, the response includes response information comprising embedded instructions and data. The embedded instructions may include instructions for using the data to generate formatted markup information for display on the computing device. The embedded instructions are then executed on the data to thereby generate formatted markup information for display on the computing device. According to a specific embodiment, the formatted markup information corresponds to HTML data to be rendered for display on the computing device.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to data networks, and more specifically to data transmission and rendering techniques to be implemented in a client-server system.



FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a typical client-server system 100, wherein the client device 102 and the server device 106 communicate with each other via the Internet 104.


In most Internet-based client-server systems, when a client process 102 desires specific information from a remote server (such as, for example, a web page), the client process transmits an HTTP request to the server 106 (via Internet 104), and the server responds by transmitting an HTTP response to the client which includes HTML data. A browser on the client machine renders the HTML data and displays it to the user in the form of an HTML (i.e. web) page. This entire process may be initiated by the user at the click of a button, such as, for example, by clicking a mouse button on a URL link. However, the desired information will typically not be displayed instantaneously. Rather, the user typically is required to wait a time interval (referred to as the end-user experienced response time) until the desired information is retrieved from the server system and displayed on the client machine. This delay is undesirable. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that it is generally desirable to reduce the end-user experienced response time.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to different embodiments of the present invention, a method and computer program product are disclosed for generating formatted information for display on a computer system. The computer system may be configured to include at least one interface for communicating with a server computer system. A request is sent from the computer system to the server system. According to one embodiment, the request may correspond to an HTTP request for information relating to a specific HTML page or web page. A response is then received from the server system. According to one embodiment, the response includes response information comprising embedded instructions and data. The embedded instructions may include instructions for using the data to generate formatted markup information for display on the computer system. The embedded instructions are then executed on the data to thereby generate formatted markup information for display on the computer system. According to a specific embodiment, the formatted markup information corresponds to HTML data to be rendered for display on the computer system.


Other embodiments are directed to a method and computer program product for generating formatted information for display on a computer system. The computer system may be configured to include at least one interface for communicating with a server computer system. A request for desired information is received from the computer system. According to one embodiment, the request may correspond to an HTTP request for information relating to a specific HTML page or web page. A response is then sent to the computer system. According to one embodiment, the response includes response information comprising embedded instructions and data. The embedded instructions may include instructions for using the data to generate formatted markup information for display on the computer system. According to a specific embodiment, the formatted markup information corresponds to HTML data to be rendered for display on the computer system.


An alternate embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for generating formatted information for display on a computer system. The system comprises at least one CPU, memory, and at least one interface for communicating with a server computer system. The system may be configured to send a request to the server system via the at least one interface. According to one embodiment, the request may correspond to an HTTP request for information relating to a specific HTML page or web page. The system may further be configured to receive a response from the server system, wherein the response includes response information comprising embedded instructions and data. The embedded instructions may include instructions for using the data to generate formatted markup information for display on the computer system. The system may be further configured to execute the embedded instructions on the data to thereby generate formatted markup information for display on the computer system. According to a specific embodiment, the formatted markup information corresponds to HTML data to be rendered for display on the computer system.


Another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for generating formatted information for display on a computer system. The system comprises at least one CPU, memory, and at least one interface for communicating with a client computer system. The system may be configured to receive a request for desired information from the client computer. According to one embodiment, the request may correspond to an HTTP request for information relating to a specific HTML page or web page. The system may further be configured or designed to send a response to the client computer, wherein the response includes response information comprising embedded instructions and data. The embedded instructions may include instructions for using the data to generate formatted markup information for display on the client system. According to a specific embodiment, the formatted markup information corresponds to HTML data to be rendered for display on the client system.


Additional objects, features and advantages of the various aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of its preferred embodiments, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a conventional client-server system 100.



FIG. 2A shows an example of an HTML page which may be used to illustrate the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention.



FIG. 2B shows an example of conventional HTML source code which may be provided by a conventional server to a conventional client device in response to an HTTP request.



FIG. 2C illustrates a specific embodiment of the source code which may be provided by a server to a client device in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram illustrating how information is transmitted between a client system and a server system in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows a network device 60 suitable for implementing the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

This application describes various features associated with data transmission and rendering techniques to be implemented in a client-server system. It will be appreciated, therefore, that the data transmission and rendering techniques described in this application merely define specific embodiments of the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention. Alternate embodiments of the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention may be derived by modifying various features of the specific embodiment described herein. Such modifications will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art.


As described previously in the Background Section of this application, it is generally desirable to reduce the end-user experienced response time as much as possible. In this regard, it will be appreciated that a combination of different factors may contribute to the overall end-user experienced response time, such as, for example, the server response time, communication latency, download time, client processing speed, etc. The server response time indicates how quickly a server is able to respond to a particular request, such as, for example, an HTTP request. The communication latency represents the start up costs associated with the connection between the client and the server. Typically, each time the user clicks on a particular link in a web browser application, a connection to a server is established, which incurs another latency period. The client processing speed corresponds to how quickly the client (or browser machine) is able to render the page as it receives it. The download time represents an amount of time that it takes to download a requested page once the request has been received and processed by the server. This value may be significantly affected by the connection speed that has been established between the client and the server.


With the limited connection speeds that are typically established between the client and the server, one of the more significant factors in the end-user experienced response time is the size of the page being downloaded. Thus, it will be appreciated that, by reducing the amount of bytes to be downloaded from the server process, the end-user experienced response time may also be reduced.



FIG. 2A shows an example of an HTML page which may be used to illustrate the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention. The HTML page 200 of FIG. 2A represents the web page which is displayed to a user of the client device 102. In the example of FIG. 2A, it is assumed that the web page 200 represents a phone book page which includes personalized contact information specific to that user. For example, a first entry 202 on page 200 provides personalized information for a contact named Bryan. A second entry 204 on page 200 provides personalized information for a contact named Dean. A third entry 206 on page 200 provides personalized information for a contact named Ajit. A fourth entry 208 on page 200 provides personalized information for a contact named Narasimha.



FIG. 2B shows an example of conventional HTML source code which may be provided by the server 106 to the client device 102, and subsequently used by a conventional web browser (such as, for example, Netscape Navigator or Internet Explorer) on the client device for rendering the web page 200. As illustrated in FIG. 2B, each entry 212, 214, 216 and 218 in the HTML source code corresponds to a respective entry 202, 204, 206, 208 displayed on web page 200. Moreover, it will be appreciated that each character of text which is displayed on the web page 200 is included in the HTML source code of FIG. 2B.



FIG. 2C illustrates a specific embodiment of modified source code which may be provided by the server 106 to the client device 102, and subsequently used for rendering the HTML page 200 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2C, the source code includes an embedded instruction portion 222 and an embedded data portion 224. In the example of FIG. 2C, it is assumed that the embedded instruction portion 222 is implemented using a scripting language such as, for example, JavaScript, and that the client web browser is capable of executing the embedded instructions. When compared to the source code of FIG. 2B, it can be seen at the source code of FIG. 2C includes fewer bytes of information. For example, it can be seen that the characters “If you want to send a fax, please use” are repeated four (4) times in FIG. 2B, but are included only once in FIG. 2C. The data portion 224 includes all the customized data which will eventually be rendered into customized HTML data.


It will be appreciated that the actual number of bytes to be transferred from the server 106 to the client device 102 in FIG. 2B is significantly greater than that of FIG. 2C. More specifically, the byte size of the data represented by FIG. 2B is 1,730 bytes, whereas the byte size of the data represented by FIG. 2C is 960 bytes.


Thus, according to at least one embodiment of the present invention, rather than the server 106 sending the entire HTML source code (as shown in FIG. 2B) to the client machine 102, the server may transmit embedded instructions and data (as shown in FIG. 2C) to the client machine, wherein the embedded instructions and data are processed at the client machine to thereby generate HTML data to be rendered for displaying to a user.



FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram illustrating how information is transmitted between a client system 102 and a server system 106 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. It will be appreciated that the flow diagram of FIG. 3 merely represents an example of a specific embodiment of how the technique of the present invention may be used to reduce the amount of actual bytes transferred from a server device to a client device.


Referring to FIG. 3, it is initially assumed that the client transmits (1) an HTTP request to the server 106. For purposes of illustration, it is assumed that the HTTP request corresponds to a request to retrieve web page 200 of FIG. 2A. The server responds (2) by transmitting an HTTP response to the client machine. According to a specific embodiment, the HTTP response includes embedded instructions and data such as that shown, for example in FIG. 2C. According to a specific implementation, the embedded data may be in ASCII text format. The embedded data may also be in other forms, such as, for example, Unicode. Additionally, according to specific embodiments, the embedded instructions may correspond to scripting language which can be interpreted by a browser or other rendering program, or alternatively, may correspond to executable code, such as, for example, a plug-in, which may be executed on at the client system 102. In the example of FIG. 3, it is assumed that the embedded instructions are implemented using JavaScript.


Upon receiving the HTTP response, the client machine may execute (3) the JavaScript on the data provided in the HTTP response to thereby generate HTML code for rendering on the client machine. According to a specific embodiment, this action may be performed by a browser application that has been configured or designed to interpret scripting instruction language such as, for example, JavaScript or JSCRIPT. Alternatively, the embedded instructions may correspond to executable code which is executed on the client system using the data from the HTTP response to generate the HTML code. A web browser or other rendering program on the client machine may than use the generated HTML code to render (4) the HTML page to be displayed on the client machine's display device.


It will be appreciated that, according to a specific embodiment of the present invention, the response transmitted from the server 106 to the client system 102 may not always include both embedded instructions and embedded data. In one implementation, the particular request transmitted by the client system to the server may be used by the server determine whether the response to the client should include only data, or both data and instructions.


By way of illustration, it is assumed that the server 106 has already transmitted a first response to client 102 which includes embedded instructions 222 and data 224 as shown in FIG. 2C. Further, it is assumed that a browser program has executed the instructions 222 on the data 224 to generate HTML data, which the browser program then rendered for display as shown in FIG. 2A. Additionally, in this example, it is assumed that the rendered page includes two additional links (not illustrated in FIG. 2A). The first link is displayed as “VIEW CALENDAR”, and the second link is displayed as “NEXT PAGE”. If the user clicks on the NEXT PAGE link, the client system will send a request to the server to retrieve the next page of contact information. When the server receives this request, it may determine from the request that it need only send the data portion relating to the next page of contact information. The client system has previously received the embedded instructions 222 for rendering the next page data. Thus, when the client system subsequently receives a response from the server which includes the next page data portion (but does not include the embedded instructions portion), the client machine may execute the previously received instructions 222 on the newly received data to thereby render the next page of contact information for display to the user.


Alternatively, if the user clicks on the VIEW CALENDAR link, the client system will send a request to the server to retrieve calendar information (which is assumed to be displayed using a different format than that shown in FIG. 2A). When the server receives this request, it may determine from the request that it needs to send both new data (i.e. calendar data) and new instructions (for rendering the calendar data) to the client system. Upon receiving the response from the server, the client system may then execute new instructions on the calendar data to thereby generate HTML data to be rendered for display to the user.


From the above description, it will be appreciated that the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention may be used to reduce the amount of actual bytes transferred from a server system (e.g., 106, FIG. 1) to a client system (e.g., 102, FIG. 1) in response to a specific client request. In this way the technique of the present invention may significantly improve the end-user experienced response time by reducing the amount of actual bytes which need to be received at the client machine, for example, during a single request-response transaction. Moreover, it will be appreciated that the technique of the present invention may be utilized in environments where connection speed is a significant factor in the end-user experienced response time.


Generally, the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention may be implemented on software and/or hardware. For example, they can be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, or on a network interface card. In a specific embodiment of this invention, the technique of the present invention is implemented in software such as an operating system or in an application running on an operating system.


A software or software/hardware hybrid implementation of the data transmission and rendering technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose programmable machine selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory. Such programmable machine may be a computer system or network device such as that shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings. The network device may have multiple network interfaces including, for example, frame relay, Ethernet, ISDN, etc. Specific examples of such a network device include routers and servers. A general architecture for some of these machines will appear from the description given below. In an alternative embodiment, the data transmission and rendering technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose network host machine such as a personal computer or workstation. Further, the invention may be at least partially implemented on a card (e.g., an interface card) for a network device or a general-purpose computing device.


Referring now to FIG. 4, a network device 60 suitable for implementing the data transmission and rendering techniques of the present invention includes a master central processing unit (CPU) 62, interfaces 68, and a bus 67 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the CPU 62 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a desired network device. For example, when configured as a client network device, the CPU 62 may be responsible for such tasks as transmitting and receiving information to and from other network devices, analyzing received information, executing JavaScript, generating HTML data using non-HTML data received from another network device, rendering HTML data for display to a user, etc. The CPU 62 preferably accomplishes all these functions under the control of software including an operating system (e.g., Windows NT), and any appropriate applications software.


CPU 62 may include one or more processors 63 such as a processor from the Motorola family of microprocessors or the MIPS family of microprocessors. In an alternative embodiment, processor 63 is specially designed hardware for controlling the operations of network device 60. In a specific embodiment, a memory 61 (such as non-volatile RAM and/or ROM) also forms part of CPU 62. However, there are many different ways in which memory could be coupled to the system. Memory block 61 may be used for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/or storing data, programming instructions, etc.


The interfaces 68 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the network device 60. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 62 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.


Although the system shown in FIG. 4 illustrates one specific network device of the present invention, it is by no means the only network device architecture on which the present invention can be implemented. For example, an architecture having a single processor that handles communications as well as routing computations, etc. is often used. Further, other types of interfaces and media could also be used with the network device.


Regardless of network device's configuration, it may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, memory block 65) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and/or other information relating to the functionality of the data transmission and rendering techniques described herein. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to include data structures which store data received from other network devices, locally generated HTML data, rendered HTML pages, etc.


Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement the systems/methods described herein, the present invention relates to machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic storage media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as floptical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). The invention may also be embodied in transmission media such as a carrier wave travelling over an appropriate medium such as airwaves, optical lines, electric lines, etc. Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.


Although several preferred embodiments of this invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise embodiments, and at various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of spirit of the invention as described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: receiving, at a first device, a first request for a first set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmitting information associated with the first request to a second device, wherein the information associated with the first request indicates that a first response responsive to the first request includes instructions and a first set of data;receiving, from the second device, the first response responsive to the first request, the first response comprising the instructions and the first set of data;generating at least a portion of the first set of structured information for display at the first device by executing at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response, wherein a first size of the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response and the at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response together is smaller than a second size of the at least a portion of the first set of structured information being generated for display;receiving, at the first device, a second request for a second set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmitting information associated with the second request to the second device, wherein the information associated with the second request indicates that a second response responsive to the second request includes a second set of data but not the instructions;receiving, from the second device, the second response responsive to the second request, the second response comprising the second set of data, the second response excluding the instructions; andgenerating at least a portion of the second set of structured information for display at the first device by executing the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the second set of data from the second response.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising transmitting the information associated with the first request to the second device via a network.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first request is received via a user operation at a user interface.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response is provided in a scripting language.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the scripting language is JavaScript.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response is executed by a program executing at the first device.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the program is a browser.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the information associated with the first request is configured to be transmitted in a wireless manner.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least a portion of the first set of structured information is in a markup language.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first set of structured information includes information associated with a number of products available to be ordered using the first device.
  • 11. A computer program product, the computer program product being embodied in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising computer instructions for: receiving, at a first device, a first request for a first set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmitting information associated with the first request to a second device, wherein the information associated with the first request indicates that a first response responsive to the first request includes instructions and a first set of data;receiving, from the second device, the first response responsive to the first request, the first response comprising the instructions and the first set of data;generating at least a portion of the first set of structured information for display at the first device by executing at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response, wherein a first size of the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response and the at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response together is smaller than a second size of the at least a portion of the first set of structured information being generated for display;receiving, at the first device, a second request for a second set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmitting information associated with the second request to the second device, wherein the information associated with the second request indicates that a second response responsive to the second request includes a second set of data but not the instructions;receiving, from the second device, the second response responsive to the second request, the second response comprising the second set of data, the second response excluding the instructions; andgenerating at least a portion of the second set of structured information for display at the first device by executing the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the second set of data from the second response.
  • 12. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the first request is received via a user operation at a user interface.
  • 13. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response is provided in a scripting language.
  • 14. The computer program product as recited in claim 13, wherein the scripting language is JavaScript.
  • 15. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response is executed by a program executing at the first device.
  • 16. The computer program product as recited in claim 15, wherein the program is a browser.
  • 17. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the information associated with the first request is configured to be transmitted in a wireless manner.
  • 18. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the at least a portion of the first set of structured information is in a markup language.
  • 19. The computer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the first set of structured information includes information associated with a number of products available to be ordered using the first device.
  • 20. A first device, comprising: one or more processors configured to: receive a first request for a first set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmit information associated with the first request to a second device, wherein the information associated with the first request indicates that a first response responsive to the first request includes instructions and a first set of data;receive, from the second device, the first response responsive to the first request, the first response comprising the instructions and the first set of data;generate at least a portion of the first set of structured information for display at the first device by executing at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response, wherein a first size of the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response and the at least a portion of the first set of data from the first response together is smaller than a second size of the at least a portion of the first set of structured information being generated for display;receive a second request for a second set of structured information to be displayed at the first device;transmit information associated with the second request to the second device, wherein the information associated with the second request indicates that a second response responsive to the second request includes a second set of data but not the instructions;receive, from the second device, the second response responsive to the second request, the second response comprising the second set of data, the second response excluding the instructions; andgenerate at least a portion of the second set of structured information for display at the first device by executing the at least a portion of the instructions from the first response on at least a portion of the second set of data from the second response; andone or more memories coupled to the one or more processors and configured to provide the one or more processors with instructions.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/083,567, filed Nov. 19, 2013, entitled: “DATA TRANSMISSION AND RENDERING TECHNIQUES BY A DEVICE VIA A NETWORK”, and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/925,669, filed Oct. 27, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,601,365, entitled: “Data Transmission and Rendering Techniques Implemented Over a Client-Server System,” and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/378,643, filed Feb. 17, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,853,870, entitled: “Data Transmission And Rendering Techniques Implemented Over A Client-Server System,” and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/821,307, filed Jun. 22, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,493,554, entitled: “Data Transmission And Rendering Techniques Implemented Over A Client-Server System,” and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/792,400, filed Feb. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,240,283, entitled: “Data Transmission and Rendering Techniques Implemented Over A Client-Server System,” and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/247,392 filed Nov. 10, 2000, entitled: “Data Compression/decompression Technique,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The present application also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603, filed on May 10, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,825, entitled: “Integrated System for Ordering, Fulfillment, and Delivery of Consumer Products using a Data Network,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (362)
Number Name Date Kind
2781643 Fairweather Feb 1957 A
3406532 Rownd Oct 1968 A
3670867 Traube Jun 1972 A
3771679 Thelm Nov 1973 A
4090626 Ebeling May 1978 A
4213310 Buss Jul 1980 A
4455453 Parasekvakos Jun 1984 A
4530067 Dorr Jul 1985 A
4656591 Goldberg Apr 1987 A
4792273 Specht Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit Jan 1989 A
4803348 Lohrey Feb 1989 A
4823984 Ficken Apr 1989 A
4887208 Schneider Dec 1989 A
4936738 Brennan Jun 1990 A
4958280 Pauly Sep 1990 A
5003015 Fleischmann Mar 1991 A
5023683 Yamada Jun 1991 A
5027269 Grant Jun 1991 A
5038283 Caveney Aug 1991 A
5093794 Howie Mar 1992 A
5101352 Rembert Mar 1992 A
5105627 Kurita Apr 1992 A
5113349 Nakamura May 1992 A
5122959 Nathanson Jun 1992 A
5235819 Bruce Aug 1993 A
5237158 Kern Aug 1993 A
5246332 Bernard Sep 1993 A
5265006 Asthana Nov 1993 A
5272638 Martin Dec 1993 A
5273392 Bernard Dec 1993 A
5322406 Pippin Jun 1994 A
5334824 Martinez Aug 1994 A
5362948 Morimoto Nov 1994 A
5363310 Haj-Ali Ahmadi Nov 1994 A
5371852 Attanasio Dec 1994 A
5395206 Cerny Mar 1995 A
5402336 Spiegelhoff Mar 1995 A
5428546 Shah Jun 1995 A
5434394 Roach Jul 1995 A
5444844 Inoue Aug 1995 A
5450317 Lu Sep 1995 A
5479530 Nair Dec 1995 A
5533361 Halpern Jul 1996 A
5535407 Yanagawa Jul 1996 A
5548518 Dietrich Aug 1996 A
5553312 Gattey Sep 1996 A
5568393 Ando Oct 1996 A
5592378 Cameron Jan 1997 A
5593269 Bernard Jan 1997 A
5598487 Hacker Jan 1997 A
5615121 Babayev Mar 1997 A
5640002 Ruppert Jun 1997 A
5664110 Green Sep 1997 A
5666493 Wojcik Sep 1997 A
5687322 Deaton Nov 1997 A
5694551 Doyle Dec 1997 A
5708780 Levergood Jan 1998 A
5710887 Chelliah Jan 1998 A
5712989 Johnson Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne Feb 1998 A
5758313 Shah May 1998 A
5758328 Giovannoli May 1998 A
5758329 Wojcik May 1998 A
5761673 Bookman Jun 1998 A
5768139 Pippin Jun 1998 A
5774660 Brendel Jun 1998 A
5774668 Choquier Jun 1998 A
5774670 Montulli Jun 1998 A
H001743 Graves Aug 1998 H
5790793 Higley Aug 1998 A
5809479 Martin Sep 1998 A
5816725 Sherman Oct 1998 A
5826242 Montulli Oct 1998 A
5826825 Gabriet Oct 1998 A
5831860 Foladare Nov 1998 A
5832457 Cherney Nov 1998 A
5834753 Danielson Nov 1998 A
5835914 Brim Nov 1998 A
5839117 Cameron Nov 1998 A
5848395 Edgar Dec 1998 A
5870473 Boesch Feb 1999 A
5878401 Joseph Mar 1999 A
5880443 McDonald Mar 1999 A
5884216 Shah Mar 1999 A
5893076 Hafner Apr 1999 A
5894554 Lowery Apr 1999 A
5895454 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5897622 Blinn Apr 1999 A
5897629 Shinagawa Apr 1999 A
5899088 Purdum May 1999 A
5910896 Hahn-Carlson Jun 1999 A
5918213 Bernard Jun 1999 A
5922040 Prabhakaran Jul 1999 A
5943652 Sisley Aug 1999 A
5943841 Wunscher Aug 1999 A
5949776 Mahany Sep 1999 A
5950173 Perkowski Sep 1999 A
5956709 Xue Sep 1999 A
5960411 Hartman Sep 1999 A
5961601 Iyengar Oct 1999 A
5963919 Brinkley Oct 1999 A
5974401 Enomoto Oct 1999 A
5979757 Tracy Nov 1999 A
5983200 Slotznick Nov 1999 A
5987377 Westerlage Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps Nov 1999 A
5999914 Blinn Dec 1999 A
6003015 Kang Dec 1999 A
6006100 Koenck Dec 1999 A
6016504 Arnold Jan 2000 A
6021392 Lester Feb 2000 A
6023683 Johnson Feb 2000 A
6023722 Colyer Feb 2000 A
6026378 Onozaki Feb 2000 A
6058417 Hess May 2000 A
6061607 Bradley May 2000 A
6070147 Harms May 2000 A
6073108 Peterson Jun 2000 A
6076106 Hamner Jun 2000 A
6076108 Courts Jun 2000 A
6081789 Purcell Jun 2000 A
6083279 Cuomo Jul 2000 A
6084528 Beach Jul 2000 A
6085170 Tsukuda Jul 2000 A
6087952 Prabhakaran Jul 2000 A
6088648 Shah Jul 2000 A
6094485 Weinstein Jul 2000 A
6094642 Stephenson Jul 2000 A
6098093 Baych Aug 2000 A
6098152 Mounes-Toussi Aug 2000 A
6101481 Miller Aug 2000 A
6101486 Roberts Aug 2000 A
6115690 Wong Sep 2000 A
6123259 Ogasawara Sep 2000 A
6128279 ONeil Oct 2000 A
6140922 Kakou Oct 2000 A
6144848 Walsh Nov 2000 A
6157380 Bennett Dec 2000 A
6157945 Balma Dec 2000 A
6158601 Baker Dec 2000 A
6167380 Kennedy Dec 2000 A
6167382 Sparks Dec 2000 A
6178510 OConnor Jan 2001 B1
6182053 Rauber Jan 2001 B1
6185479 Cirrone Feb 2001 B1
6185601 Wolff Feb 2001 B1
6185625 Tso Feb 2001 B1
6195542 Griffith Feb 2001 B1
6208908 Boyd Mar 2001 B1
6215952 Yoshio Apr 2001 B1
6223215 Hunt Apr 2001 B1
6225995 Jacobs May 2001 B1
6233543 Butts May 2001 B1
6236972 Shkedy May 2001 B1
6236974 Kolawa May 2001 B1
6237040 Tada May 2001 B1
6249773 Allard Jun 2001 B1
6249801 Zisapel Jun 2001 B1
6253292 Jhang Jun 2001 B1
6260024 Shkedy Jul 2001 B1
6275812 Haq Aug 2001 B1
6279001 DeBettencourt Aug 2001 B1
6289260 Bradley Sep 2001 B1
6289369 Sundaresan Sep 2001 B1
6289370 Panarello Sep 2001 B1
6292784 Martin Sep 2001 B1
6295553 Gilbertson Sep 2001 B1
6317648 Sleep Nov 2001 B1
6324520 Walker Nov 2001 B1
6332334 Faryabi Dec 2001 B1
6341269 Dulaney Jan 2002 B1
6343275 Wong Jan 2002 B1
6347322 Bogantz Feb 2002 B1
6351775 Yu Feb 2002 B1
6360256 Lim Mar 2002 B1
6369840 Barnett Apr 2002 B1
6374300 Masters Apr 2002 B2
6385642 Chlan May 2002 B1
6397246 Wolfe May 2002 B1
6405173 Honarvar Jun 2002 B1
6421106 Takatsuka Jul 2002 B1
6421739 Holiday Jul 2002 B1
6424947 Tsuria Jul 2002 B1
6424992 Devarakonda Jul 2002 B2
6429801 Pergande Aug 2002 B1
6438652 Jordan Aug 2002 B1
6445976 Ostro Sep 2002 B1
6453306 Quelene Sep 2002 B1
6463345 Peachey-Kountz Oct 2002 B1
6463420 Guidice Oct 2002 B1
6466949 Yang Oct 2002 B2
6471995 Ramstack Oct 2002 B1
6473802 Masters Oct 2002 B2
6480894 Courts Nov 2002 B1
6484150 Blinn Nov 2002 B1
6490567 Gregory Dec 2002 B1
6496205 White Dec 2002 B1
6505093 Thatcher Jan 2003 B1
6505171 Cohen Jan 2003 B1
6526392 Dietrich Feb 2003 B1
6530518 Krichilsky Mar 2003 B1
6535726 Johnson Mar 2003 B1
6535880 Muskgrove Mar 2003 B1
6539494 Abramson Mar 2003 B1
6549891 Rauber Apr 2003 B1
6560717 Scott May 2003 B1
6567786 Bibelnieks May 2003 B1
6567848 Kusuda May 2003 B1
6571213 Altendahl May 2003 B1
6578005 Lesaint Jun 2003 B1
6587827 Hennig Jul 2003 B1
6587866 Modi Jul 2003 B1
6594641 Southam Jul 2003 B1
6594692 Reisman Jul 2003 B1
6598024 Walker Jul 2003 B1
6598027 Breen Jul 2003 B1
6601101 Lee Jul 2003 B1
6609159 Dukach Aug 2003 B1
6622127 Klots Sep 2003 B1
6629079 Spiegel Sep 2003 B1
6629135 Ross Sep 2003 B1
6654726 Hanzek Nov 2003 B1
6671818 Mikurak Dec 2003 B1
6679425 Sheppard Jan 2004 B1
6691165 Bruck Feb 2004 B1
6697849 Carlson Feb 2004 B1
6697964 Dodrill Feb 2004 B1
6701367 Belkin Mar 2004 B1
6711618 Danner Mar 2004 B1
6718387 Gupta Apr 2004 B1
6721713 Guheen Apr 2004 B1
6741995 Chen May 2004 B1
6748318 Jones Jun 2004 B1
6748418 Yoshida Jun 2004 B1
6763496 Hennings Jul 2004 B1
6772333 Brendel Aug 2004 B1
6779016 Aziz Aug 2004 B1
6788425 Ohtsuka Sep 2004 B1
6799165 Boesjes Sep 2004 B1
6801949 Bruck Oct 2004 B1
6826613 Wang Nov 2004 B1
6845503 Carlson Jan 2005 B1
6859834 Arora Feb 2005 B1
6862572 de Sylva Mar 2005 B1
6865601 Cherkasova Mar 2005 B1
6873970 Showghi Mar 2005 B2
6879965 Fung Apr 2005 B2
6879995 Chinta Apr 2005 B1
6888836 Cherkasova May 2005 B1
6901382 Richards May 2005 B1
6904455 Yen Jun 2005 B1
6938079 Anderson Aug 2005 B1
6947992 Shachor Sep 2005 B1
6957186 Guheen Oct 2005 B1
6963847 Kennedy Nov 2005 B1
6970837 Walker Nov 2005 B1
6975937 Kantarjiev Dec 2005 B1
6980962 Reisman Dec 2005 B1
6990460 Parkinson Jan 2006 B2
7010501 Roslak Mar 2006 B1
7028187 Rosen Apr 2006 B1
7035914 Payne Apr 2006 B1
7040541 Swartz May 2006 B2
7043455 Cuomo May 2006 B1
7062556 Chen Jun 2006 B1
7085729 Kennedy Aug 2006 B1
7124101 Mikurak Oct 2006 B1
7139637 Waddington Nov 2006 B1
7139721 Borders Nov 2006 B2
7151612 Mikami Dec 2006 B2
7165041 Guheen Jan 2007 B1
7173177 Gould Feb 2007 B1
7177825 Borders Feb 2007 B1
7181539 Knight Feb 2007 B1
7197547 Miller Mar 2007 B1
7222161 Yen May 2007 B2
7236942 Walker Jun 2007 B1
7240283 Narashimha Jul 2007 B1
7251612 Parker Jul 2007 B1
7275042 Kelly Sep 2007 B1
7299294 Bruck Nov 2007 B1
7346564 Kirklin Mar 2008 B1
7366755 Cuomo Apr 2008 B1
7370005 Ham May 2008 B1
7383233 Singh Jun 2008 B1
7437305 Kantarjiev Oct 2008 B1
7493554 Paila Feb 2009 B2
7509407 Miller Mar 2009 B2
7532947 Waddington May 2009 B2
7603302 Drummond Oct 2009 B1
7792712 Kantarjiev Sep 2010 B2
7853870 Paila Dec 2010 B2
7882501 Carlson Feb 2011 B1
7904975 Kruglikov Mar 2011 B2
7930416 Miller Apr 2011 B2
8010411 Woodward Aug 2011 B2
8140183 Waddington Mar 2012 B2
8170915 Borders May 2012 B2
8326708 Kantarjiev Dec 2012 B2
8600821 Borders Dec 2013 B2
8601365 Paila Dec 2013 B2
8626333 Waddington Jan 2014 B2
8635113 Borders Jan 2014 B2
8751334 Wijaya Jun 2014 B2
20010013007 Tsukuda Aug 2001 A1
20010016828 Philippe Aug 2001 A1
20010037229 Jacobs Nov 2001 A1
20010042021 Matsuo Nov 2001 A1
20010042050 Fletcher Nov 2001 A1
20010047285 Borders Nov 2001 A1
20010047310 Russell Nov 2001 A1
20010049619 Powell Dec 2001 A1
20010049672 Moore Dec 2001 A1
20010052024 Devarakonda Dec 2001 A1
20020002513 Chiasson Jan 2002 A1
20020004766 White Jan 2002 A1
20020007299 Florence Jan 2002 A1
20020010633 Brotherson Jan 2002 A1
20020013950 Tomsen Jan 2002 A1
20020038224 Bhadra Mar 2002 A1
20020038261 Kargman Mar 2002 A1
20020049853 Chu Apr 2002 A1
20020050526 Swartz May 2002 A1
20020065700 Powell May 2002 A1
20020116279 Nobilio Aug 2002 A1
20020188530 Wojcik Dec 2002 A1
20020194084 Surles Dec 2002 A1
20020194087 Spiegel Dec 2002 A1
20030065565 Wagner Apr 2003 A1
20030079227 Knowles Apr 2003 A1
20030119485 Ogasawara Jun 2003 A1
20030233190 Jones Dec 2003 A1
20040107125 Guheen Jun 2004 A1
20040236635 Publicover Nov 2004 A1
20050027580 Crici Feb 2005 A1
20050144641 Lewis Jun 2005 A1
20050261985 Miller Nov 2005 A1
20060085250 Kantarjiev Apr 2006 A1
20060142895 Waddington Jun 2006 A1
20070016463 Borders Jan 2007 A1
20070112647 Borders May 2007 A1
20070162353 Borders Jul 2007 A1
20070174144 Borders Jul 2007 A1
20070250572 Narashimha Oct 2007 A1
20080015959 Kruglikov Jan 2008 A1
20080154709 Ham Jun 2008 A1
20090063439 Rauser Mar 2009 A1
20090094085 Kantarjiev Apr 2009 A1
20090150534 Miller Jun 2009 A1
20090164570 Paila Jun 2009 A1
20090222129 Waddington Sep 2009 A1
20100241269 Ham Sep 2010 A1
20100332402 Kantarjiev Dec 2010 A1
20110047210 Paila Feb 2011 A1
20110173090 Miller Jul 2011 A1
20110258074 Woodward Oct 2011 A1
20120173449 Waddington Jul 2012 A1
20140074919 Paila Mar 2014 A1
20140089138 Borders Mar 2014 A1
20140108287 Waddington Apr 2014 A1
20140229338 Borders Aug 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0425405 May 1991 EP
2696722 Apr 1994 FR
2265032 Sep 1993 GB
9907121 Feb 1992 WO
9909508 Feb 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (87)
Entry
Ives, Blake et al., ‘The Information System as a Competitive Weapon’, Communications of the ACM, vol. 27, No. 12, Dec. 1984. 9 pages.
Jaffe, Charles A. ‘Gas supplier takes timing seriously if deliveries are late, the product is free,’ The Morning Call, Allentown, PA, Feb. 5, 1989, pp. 1-4.
Koster, Rene de, ‘Routing Orderpickers in a Warehouse: A Comparison Between Optimal and Heuristic Solutions,’ IIE Transactions, May 1998, vol. 30, No. 5, p. 469.
Load-Balancing Internet Servers, IBM International Technical Support Organization, Austin Center, Dec. 1997, International Business Machines Corporation 1997, pp. 1-162.
Maeglin, Kathy, ‘Services Take the ‘Shop’ Out of Shopping for Groceries’, The Capital Times, Mar. 20, 1997, 2 pages.
Mai et al., ‘Consumers' Perceptions of Specialty Foods and the Rural Mail Order Business’, 52nd EAAE Seminar—Parma, Jun. 19-21, 1997, pp. 331-348.
Malone et al., ‘Computers, Networks, and the Corporation,’ Center for Information Systems Research, MIT, Aug. 1991, 14 pages.
Maloney, David, ‘The New Corner Drugstore’, Modern Materials Handling, vol. 55, No. 5, May 1, 2000, p. 58.
Marsh, Barbara, ‘Peapod's On-Line Grocery Service Checks Out Success—Customers Shop Electronic Aisles; Finicky Workers Sack the Goods’, The Wall Street Journal, Jun. 30, 1994, 2 pages.
Meeker et al., The Internet Retailing Report, U.S. Investment Research, Morgan Stanley, May 28, 1997, 241 pages.
Menzies, David, ‘Checking out the aisles by computer: Cori Bonina, General Manager of Stong's market in Vancouver, has made a virtual success of a meat-and-potatoes business’, National Post, Dec. 1, 1998, 2 pages.
New medium, new message, Oct. 23, 1993, The Economist, vol. 329, Iss. 7834, p. S16, 3 pgs.
Norton, Dr. Tim, “End-To-End Response Time: Where to Measure?”, Simalytic Solutions, LLC CMG99 Session 423, Dec. 8, 1999.
Numetrix Unveils xtr@; an Internet-Designed Solution for Real-Time Supply Chain Collaboration, Business/Technology Editors, Business Wire, New York: Dec. 16, 1998, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=11&did=37215461&SrchMode=2&sid=1&Fmt=3 . . . Jan. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4.
Parker, Rachel, ‘UPS Pioneers a cellular data network’, InfoWorld, ABI/INFORM Global, Jun. 8, 1992, pp. S59-S60.
Patterson, Rebecca H., ‘No Lines at Britain's First On-Line Grocery Store, but You Still May Wait’, The Wall Street Journal Europe, Jul. 25, 1997, 3 pages.
PC Foods, ‘Customer Service Agreement,’ printed from website: http://pcfoods.com, Abstract No. XP-002245026, 1999, pp. 1-2.
Peapod, Inc., Telephone Grocery Shopping Guide, Aug. 7, 1992, 3 introductory pages and pp. 1-12.
Pearce, Michael R. ‘From carts to clicks’, Ivey Business Quarterly, Autumn 1998, vol. 63, No. 1, p. 69-71.
Podmolik, Mary Ellen, ‘Groceries Seeing Green From Computer Shopping’, Chicago Sun-Times, May 8, 1996, 1 page.
Poirier, Charles et al., Supply Chain Optimization, Building the Strongest Total Business Network, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, Copyright 1996, 30 pages.
Purpura, Linda, ‘Getting to House from Order Smooth Transitions from Order, to Pick, to Pack, to Delivery, are a Vital Part of a Successful Home-Shopping Program’, Supermarket News, Oct. 6, 1997, 2 pages.
QuickRef Guide, QuickRefUS, Version 4.0x, U.S. Retail, 1998, 34 pgs.
Saccomano, Ann, “Blue Laws' Still Apply,” Traffic World, Logistics Section, p. 15, Aug. 23, 1999, 2 pages.
Sekita, Takashi, ‘The Physical Distribution Information Network in the Home-Delivery Business’ Japan Computer Quarterly, Abstract No. XP-00.431194, 1990, pp. 23-32.
Smart Shopping for Busy People, webpage, Peapod, http://web.archive.org/web/19961113145048/peapod.com/ Nov. 11, 1996, 1 page.
Smith et al., ‘Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution’, Operations Research, vol. 48, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2000, pp. 50-64.
Towie, Henry, ‘On the Fast Track with Totaltracks: UPS Deploys Mobile Date Service,’ Abstract No. XP-000560076, Document Delivery World, vol. 9, No. 3, 1993, pp. 30-31.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,572, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/620,199, filed Jul. 20, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,570, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,571, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,603, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,613, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,614, filed May 10, 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/568,823, filed May 10, 2000.
User Manual, Peapod, Inc., Version 3.10, Aug. 7, 1992, 83 pages.
Van den Berg, Jeroen, ‘A Literature Survey on Planning and Control of Warehousing Systems’, Aug. 1999, IIE Transactions vol. 31, No. 8, p. 751.
Vass et al., ‘The World Wide Web—Everything you (n)ever wanted to know about its server’, IEEE, Oct./Nov. 1998, pp. 33-37.
WebSphere Application Server 3.0, Advanced Edition, Programming Documentation, pp. 1-205, date unknown.
WebSphere Application Server 3.0, Standard Edition, Programming Documentation, pp. 1-188, Allegedly dated Oct. 1999.
WebSphere V3 Performance Tuning Guide, First Edition {Mar. 2000), International Business Machines Corporation 2000, pp. 1-210.
Wilson, Joe, ‘Selecting Warehouse Management Software (WMS) for Food Distribution Operations’, Frozen Food Digest, Oct. 1998, vol. 14, No. 1, p. 18.
Worth Wren Jr., Fort Worth Star-Telegram Texas, ‘Albertson's Expects Online Grocery Shopping to Boom’, KRTBN <Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News (Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas), Nov. 9, 1998.
Wunnava et al., ‘Interactive Multimedia on the World Wide Web’, IEEE, Aug. 1999, pp. 110-115.
www.peapod.com, including Introduction to Peapod; How Peapod Works; Peapod: Choosing a Delivery Time; Peapod: Sending Your Order; Retrieved from Internet Archive (web.archive.org) on Jul. 23, 2006, Alleged date Nov. 13, 1996, pp. 1-9.
www.peapod.com, Retrieved from Internet Archive (web.archive.org) on Jul. 23, 2006. Date of document is Feb. 28, 1998.
Enterprise JavaBeans TM Programmer's Guide, Inprise Application ServerTM Version 4.0, 1999 Inprise Corporation, pp. 1-165.
Here's How Peapod Works, webpages, Peapod, http://web.archive.Org/web/19961113151243/peapod.com/work.html, Nov. 13, 1996, 2 pages.
Imposing an Objective Viewpoint, Modem Purchasing, vol. 36, las. 3, Mar. 1994, pp. 1-4.
Installation and Shopping Tips for the Mac, Peapod Video, 1993, 1 page.
Introduction to Peapod, webpages, Peapod, http://web.archive.org/web/19961113145506/peapod.com/intro.html, Nov. 13, 1996, 2 pages.
More Information, webpages, Peapod, http://web.archive.org/web/19961113145540/peapod.com/more.html, Nov. 13, 1996, 2 pages.
Online Groceries, A Quicker Shopping Cart? E-Commerce Customers—What, Where and Why They Buy, Standard Media Inc. and Odyssey, LP, Spring 2000, 19 pages.
Peapod Interactive Grocery Shopping and Delivery Service Now Delivers Via the Internet, Press Release, peapod.com, Apr. 22, 1996, pp. 1-2.
Shopping-Virtually Hassle-Free, Computer Weekly, Apr. 10, 1997, 2 pages.
“IBM Provides the Power for Enterprise e-business Solutions by Launching New Phase of Server Software,” News Release, Las Vegas, Jul. 20,1999, 2 pgs.
Alba et al., “Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketeplaces”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, No. 3, Jul. 1, 1997,18 pgs.
Anon, Automatic ID News, ‘20/20 Results Achieved with Technology Trio’, Sep. 1995,p. 19.
Anupindi et al., ‘Estimation of Consumer Demand with Stock-Out Based Substitution: An Application to Vending Machine Product’, Marketing Science, vol. 17, No. 4, 1998, pp. 406-423.
Backhome Foods Review, est 1998, 30 pgs.
BIG-IP Controller Administrator Guide, version 3.3, 1997-2000 F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-401.
BIG-IP FireGuard Controller Administrator Guide, version 3.3, 1997-2000 F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-168.
Bloch et al., ‘On the Road of Electronic Commerce-a Business Value Framework, Gaining Competitive Advantage and Some Research Issues’, Mar. 1996, 20 pages.
Bluestone Software's EJB Technology, A Technical White Paper by TechMetrix Research, Philippe Mougin, TechMetrix 2000, pp. 1-24.
Bluestone XML-Server: First Application Server to Recognize XML As a Data Type, White Paper, 1999 NC.Focus, pp. 1-21.
Booker, et al. ‘Up in the air’, Computerworld, Oct. 11, 1993; 27, 41; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 54.
Brown Janelle, ‘Pod People Peapod, the online grocery service, sounds great—but can it deliver?’ Salon Media Group, Inc., Dec. 17, 1998, 3 pages.
Chandler, Susan. ‘The grocery cart in your PC,’ Business Week, Iss. 3441, 1995, p. 63, 2 pages.
Coffman, Steve. Building earth's largest library: Drive into the future. Mar. 1999. Searcher, 7, 3, 34(1).
Consumer Direct HHT Training Guide, Jun. 1998, 120 pgs.
Consumer Direct Selling Backhome Foods Products—1999: HHT Training Guide, Mar. 29, 1999, 33 pgs.
Corcoran, Cathy, ‘The Skeptic's Guide to on-line shopping. Who has time to shop for groceries? So we gave Peapod a test run.’ The Patriot Ledger, Quincy, MA, Jul. 7, 1997, 4 pages.
Descartes Licenses Energy V6 Supply Chain Suite to Major Pepsi Bottler . . . News Release, Descartes Systems Group Inc., Waterloo Ontario, Aug. 27, 1998, 2 pages.
Deshpande, Salil. ‘Clustering: Transparent Replication, Load Balancing, and Failover,’ CustomWare, Jan. 2000, pp. 1-23.
Dilger, Karen Abramic, ‘Warehouse Wonders’, Manufacturing Systems, vol. 15, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1997, 4 pages.
Dyck, Timothy, ‘IBM's WebSphere 3.0 pushes ahead,’ PC Week, vol. 16, No. 42, Oct. 18, 1999, 4 pgs.
Dyson et al., ‘Electronic Delivery without the Internet (Digital Delivery of Newspapers)’, The Seybold Report on Publishing Systems, vol. 25, No. 1, ISBN: 0736-7260, Sep. 1, 1995, 9 pages.
Eckerson, Wayne, ‘Grocers put stock in EDI to streamline deliveries; New electronic data interchange systems offer a wealth of benefits for retailers and suppliers,’ Network World, Inc., Aug. 7, 1989, 2 pages.
eShopper: Resources for Web Buying. Savetz, Kevin; Gardiner, Peace, Computer Shopper, 19, 5, 280(1), May, 1999.
Fielding et al., ‘Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1, RFC 2616’, Network Working Group, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-90.
First Stop-Main Menu, website tour, Peapod, http://web.archive.org/web/19961113150913/peapod.com/tour1.html, 13 pages.
Frequently Asked Questions, webpages, Peapod, http://web.archive.Org/web/19961113150832/peapod.com/question.html Nov. 13, 1996, 2 pages.
Fynes, Brian, et al., The Impact of Electronic Data Interchange on Competitiveness in Retail Supply Chain, IBAR, vol. 14, No. 2, 1993, pp. 16-28.
Hiroo Kawata, ‘Information Technology of Commercial Vehicles in the Japanese Parcel Service Business,’ Abstract No. XP-000560489, 1992, pp. 371-382.
Hoffman, Thomas, ‘New UPS CIO eyes cyberdelivery,’ Computerworid, Nov. 11, 1996. 30, 46; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 4.
Hyten, Todd, ‘Stop & Shop mulls online grocery store’, Boston Business Journal (Boston, MA, US), vol. 16, No. 6, Mar. 22, 1996, p. 1.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170006138 A1 Jan 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60247392 Nov 2000 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 14083567 Nov 2013 US
Child 15203701 US
Parent 12925669 Oct 2010 US
Child 14083567 US
Parent 12378643 Feb 2009 US
Child 12925669 US
Parent 11821307 Jun 2007 US
Child 12378643 US
Parent 09792400 Feb 2001 US
Child 11821307 US