The present disclosure relates to data transmission cables, such as an ethernet cables.
Known ethernet cables are designed with balanced twisted pairs (e.g., four twisted pairs) and are classified into categories based mainly on bandwidth (measured in MHz), maximum data rate (measured in megabits per second) and as screened/unscreened.
As an example, a Category 5 (Cat5) cable has a data rate of up to 100 Mbps. Cat5 cable is used for standard 10 BaseT and 100 BaseT (fast ethernet) networks, and can distribute data, video and telephone signals at distances up to 100 meters.
In comparison to Cat5 cable, a Cat6 cable provides greater bandwidth and data transfer rates up to 1 Gbps over 100 m. However, at shorter distances of up to 37 m, Cat6 is able to achieve 10 Gbps speeds thanks to its improved shielding and higher bandwidth. Cat6 may often include a physical separator called a “spline” between the four pairs to reduce crosstalk and foil shielding to reduce electromagnetic interference.
With a bandwidth of up to 2 GHz and a data rate of up to 40 Gbs, cable of Category 8 (Cat8) is employed for switch-to-switch communications in a 25 GBase T or 40 GBase T network. It is observed that Cat8 cables have a maximum reach (30 m) significantly reduced with respect lower category cables.
Document U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,340 discloses an electrical conductor cable for transmitting information including a set of conductors or pairs of conductors insulated from each other and at least two metalized longitudinal flexible tapes separating the conductors or pairs and applied around each conductor or pair by virtue of twisting or torsion of the cable.
Document U.S. Pat. No. 10,347,397 relates to a cable for transmitting electrical signals comprising an outer casing made of an electrically insulating material and at least two lines arranged within the outer casing, wherein each line as at least one wire made of an electrically conductive material. The dielectrics of the wires of one line have a value for the relative permittivity of the dielectrics surrounding the respective wires differing by a quantity between 0.01 to 2.0 in comparison with the wires of a different line. This results in different propagation speeds for electrical signals on these lines with different dielectrics around the wires. The cable is a star quad cable, in which the four wires of the two lines (two wires per line) are twisted with one another in a cruciform manner.
Document U.S. Pat. No. 5,424,491 discloses a telecommunications cable having a plurality of pairs of twisted together individually insulated conductors, the twist lay length of at least some conductor pairs being different from that of others, and the insulation thickness of the conductors of at least some pairs being different from that of other pairs.
At present, the majority, if not all of the marketed ethernet cables use balanced lines (or signal pairs) each consisting of two conductors of the same type, each of which having equal impedances along their lengths and equal impedances to ground and to other circuits to reduce noise and interference as much as possible. See, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_line and C. R. Paul, Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines, 2nd Ed. IEEE Press, 2008, Chap.1.5.2.
Common mode parameters have been considered to improve the transmission parameters. See, for example, Kaden, H.: “Wirbelströme und Schirmung in der Nachrichten-technik”; Springer-Verlag, chapter E-2., 1959, and Pfeiler, C.; Molin, D.: Calculation of common mode parameters of cables for high data rate digital communications; Proceeding of the 64th IWCS; p. 505 to 508. However, the Applicant noticed that Cat8 cables typically show distortion effects of the transmission parameters that do not allow using the common mode, in addition to the differential mode, for high speed data transmission.
The Applicant recognizes that in data transmission cables a further increase of data rate, with respect to the values obtainable with the known cables (e.g., Cat8 cables) but avoiding further decrease of the maximum reach, is appealing.
The Applicant has invented a data transmission cable comprising at least two pairs of insulated conductors, the insulated conductors of a pair being untwisted one another, and including a metallic screen wrapped around each insulated conductor, has increased data rate and limited crosstalk effects. Said data transmission cable allows efficiently operating in common mode in addition to balanced (a.k.a. differential) mode.
Thus, the present disclosure relates to a data transmission cable comprising:
In an embodiment, the first balanced untwisted cable pair is associated with a first group of structural parameters and the second balanced cable pair is associated with a second group of structural parameters different from the first group of structural parameters in at least one value.
In an embodiment, the first group of parameters includes: a first external diameter of the first and second insulated conductor; a first inner diameter of the first and second insulated conductor and a first dielectric constant of the first and second insulation layers. The second group of parameters includes: a second external diameter of the third and fourth insulated conductor; a second inner diameter of the third and fourth insulated conductor and a second dielectric constant of the third and fourth insulation layers.
The first group of parameters, the second group of parameters and the metallic screen are suitable to reduce crosstalk between the first cable pair and the at least one second cable pair.
In an embodiment, the insulated conductors of the present data transmission cable, while being untwisted each other in a pair, are stranded altogether. For example, while the first and the second insulated conductors are untwisted with respect to each other, they are stranded with the third and the fourth insulated conductor.
The data transmission cable of the present disclosure further includes an outer sheath surrounding the first pair, the at least one second pair and the metallic screen.
In an embodiment, the metallic screen may comprise at least one metallic foil. When the metallic screen comprises two or more metallic foils, these foils can be partially radially superposed.
In an embodiment, the foil/s of the metallic screen is/are made of a material selected from copper, aluminium, or alloys thereof.
In an embodiment, a further metallic screen may be present between the metallic screen and the outer sheath.
In an embodiment, the data transmission cable of the present disclosure is configured to operate according to an ethernet protocol. The data transmission cable of the present disclosure can be configured to operate according to a high data rate protocols, for example higher than 10 Gbit/s or higher than 40 Gbit/s.
The present disclosure also relates to a data transmission system comprising
In the present description and claims the term “insulation”, “insulated” and the like, and “conductive”, “conductor” and the like are meant to refer to electrically insulating and electrically conducting entities.
Further characteristics and advantages will be more apparent from the following description of the various embodiments given as a way of an example with reference to the enclosed drawings in which:
The first insulated conductor 1 comprises a first conductor 5, e.g., a metal rod or metal stranded wires, surrounded by a first insulating layer 6. The first insulated conductor 1 is associated with a first group of parameters comprising: a first external diameter D1, e.g., the diameter of the first insulated conductor 1, a first inner diameter d1, e.g., the outer diameter of the first conductor 5, and a first dielectric constant ε1, e.g., the dielectric constant of the first insulating layer 6. The second insulated conductor 4 comprises a second conductor 14, e.g., a metal rod or metal stranded wires, surrounded by a second insulating layer 15.
The first insulated conductor 1 and the second insulated conductor 4 form a balanced untwisted pair since they, in some implementations, have substantially identical impedances along their lengths and substantially identical impedances to ground and to other circuits. The second insulated conductor 4 of the first pair 100 has a respective group of parameters having values substantially identical to those of the first group of parameters of the first insulated conductor 1, e.g., D1, d1, ε1.
In the present description and claims the term “substantially identical” (and the symbol≈denoting this term) refers to a parameter value of one insulated conductor being the same of the respective parameter value of another insulated conductor or having a difference from one another of a magnitude not greater than typical manufacturing or standard tolerances.
The second cable pair 200 (hereinafter also called “second pair”) has a third insulated conductor 3 and a fourth insulated conductor 2. The third insulated conductor 3 comprises a third conductor 9, e.g., a metal rod or metal stranded wires, surrounded by a third insulating layer 10. The third insulated conductor 3 is associated with a second group of parameters comprising: a second external diameter D3, e.g., the diameter of the third insulated conductor 3, a second inner diameter d3, e.g., the outer diameter of the third conductor 9, and a second dielectric constant 63, e.g., the dielectric constant of the third insulating layer 10. The fourth insulated conductor 2 comprises a third conductor 7, e.g., a metal rod or metal stranded wires, surrounded by a third insulating layer 8.
The third insulated conductor 3 and the fourth insulated conductor 2 form a balanced untwisted pair. The fourth insulated conductor 2 has a respective group of parameters having the values substantially identical to those of the second group of parameters of the third insulated conductor 3 (D3, d3, ε3).
The first pair 100 and the second pair 200 are unbalanced with respect to each other in that each insulated conductor 1, 4 of the first pair 100 is unbalanced with respect to each insulated conductor 3, 2 of the second pair 200. In some implementations, each insulated conductor 1, 4 have impedances with respect to ground substantially identical to the impedances of insulated conductor 3, 2, but different signal propagation speed. It is observed that the mutual unbalanced status between first pair 100 and the second pair 200 allows decoupling the first pair 100 from the second pair 200 by different velocities of propagation.
The first group of parameters D1, d1, ε1 associated with the first insulated conductor 1 and the second insulated conductor 4 has at least one value different from the respective value of the second group of parameters D3, d3, ε3 associated with the third insulated conductor 3 and the fourth insulated conductor 2. For example, at least the first inner diameter d1 of the first group has a value different from the second inner diameter d3 of the second group.
Each insulated conductor of the first cable pair 100 and the second cable pair 200 is separated from the other insulated conductors by a metallic screen 11. The metallic screen 11 electromagnetically decouples each insulated conductor 1-4 from the other ones. The metallic screen 11 wraps around each insulated conductor 1-4. The metallic screen may be made of a single metallic foil or of a plurality of metallic foils of, for example, copper, aluminium or a laminate of copper/ or aluminium/polymer.
In an embodiment, the metallic screen 11 comprises a single metal foil 12 longitudinally arranged, by turnings and plies, in two layers at least partially wrapping the insulated conductors 1-4. Each of the first 1, the second 2, the third 3 and the fourth 4 insulated conductors is at least partially surrounded by the two layers of the metallic foil 12 which isolates each insulated conductor 1-4 from the others.
In another non illustrated embodiment, the metal screen can comprise two or more metal foils longitudinally arranged, by turnings and plies, in two or more layers at least partially wrapping the insulated conductors 1-4. A similar provision is illustrated, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,340.
In an embodiment, the metal screen is made of at least one metallic foil having a thickness of 3 to 100 μm, for example from 9 to 50 μm.
While the insulated conductors forming each pair 100, 200 are not twisted with one another, e.g., the first insulated conductor 1 is not twisted with the second insulated conductor 4, and the third 3 is not twisted with the fourth 2 insulated conductors, the insulated conductors 1, 4, 3 and 2 are stranded altogether.
Data transmission cable 300 also comprises an outer sheath 13 surrounding the first pair 100, the second pair 200 and the metallic foil 12. The sheath 13 can be made of a polymeric material, for example polyethylene, the polymer material optionally being a halogen-free and flame-retardant (HFFR) one.
The transmission system 400 includes a communication device 500 connected to the data transmission cable 300 and configured to perform processing (such as an example: modulation, demodulation, packet encapsulation etc.) necessary for the transmission and the reception of data to/from the data transmission cable 300. Particularly, the transmission system 400 can operate according to the ethernet protocol.
According to an example (
The two screened insulated conductors 1 and 4 are working together as a pair 100 as the signal generators G1 and G4 operate in a way that both modes of the pair 100 are excited simultaneously. Both modes are used simultaneously for data transmission and the data transmission is possible in both forward and backward direction simultaneously (full duplex). The metallic screens 11 (e.g., made as described with reference to
Moreover, the communication device 500 includes, in the present example, two further signal generators G3 and G2 each associated with an impedance Z which are connected to the screened insulated conductors 3 and 2 at the near end of the cable 300. These insulated conductors are working together as pair 200. The metallic screens 11 (e.g., made as described with reference to
As an example, each insulated conductor 1-4 has an impedance Z of about 50 Ω in order to achieve a balanced impedance of about 100 Ω for the first cable pair 100 operating as differential pair. According to this example, the common mode impedance is of about 25 Ω.
The data transmission cable of the present disclosure can be configured to have a data rate greater than that of the ethernet cable of Category 8 without any further decrease of the maximum reach. Indeed, the first and second cable pair operating both according to the differential mode with a data rate (i.e. data transfer speed) of up to 40 Gbps, in a frequency range of up to 2 GHz, and according to the common mode with a data rate of up to 80 Gbps, in a frequency range of up to 2 GHz, may have a transmission reach be greater than 30 m also for 80 Gbps. In this way, the data transmission rate can be doubled without further decrease of the maximum transmission length.
In the data transmission cable of the present disclosure, the two insulated conductors forming a cable pair can be circumferentially adjacent as above described or, according to another embodiment, they can be radially adjacent. For example, the first insulated conductor 1 and the fourth insulated conductor 2 are radially adjacent to one another.
With reference to the number of cable pairs, according to implementations of the data transmission cable of the present disclosure, more than two cable pairs can be employed. For example, the data transmission cable may have four cable pairs, each additional pair differing from one or more of the first cable pair 100 or the second cable pairs 200 in the parameters. In some implementations, each cable pair has a respective group of parameters (Di, di, ε1i) different from that of another cable pairs. Insulated conductors are disposed circumferentially one another.
In the following paragraphs crosstalk aspects in the data transmission cable 300 of
The crosstalk between the first insulated conductor 1 of the first pair 100 with the third insulated conductor 3 of the second pair 200 is discussed hereinbelow.
Considering a voltage U0 driving the first insulated conductor 1 at the beginning of the line (x=0), the voltages at opposite ends (x=0 and x=1) of the third insulated conductor 3 can be calculated according to the following equations:
where:
The effective transfer impedance is introduced according to Kaden, H.: “Wirbelströme und Schirmung in der Nachrichten-technik”; Springer-Verlag, chapter L-4., 1959. Comparison of simulated and measurement data discussed in the above-mentioned Pfeiler, C., et al. shows that the use of the transfer impedance of a single insulated conductor is effective for calculating a good approximation of the effective transfer impedance.
The insulated conductors 1, 4 of the first pair 100 are configured to show similar values of the propagation constants, e.g., substantially identical to a first value γ1, and the insulated conductors 3, 2 of the second pair 200 show similar values of the propagation constants, e.g., substantially identical to a second value γ3 different from the first value γ1. This choice contributes to reduce the crosstalk.
Moreover, it is noticed that the metallic foil 12 of the metal screen 11 at least partially surrounding each insulated conductor 1-4 as above described contributes to reduce the effective transfer impedance Rk and so the crosstalk effect.
The crosstalk between the first cable pair 100 and the second cable pair 200 is discussed hereinbelow.
To drive in differential mode the first insulated conductor 1 and second insulated conductor 4 forming a balanced untwisted pair 100, the following respective voltages U1 and U4 are applied according to a differential mode:
Also, insulated conductors 3 and 2, operating according to the differential mode, form the balanced untwisted pair 200. As the propagation constants of the first cable pair 100 are substantially identical (γ1≈γ2) and the propagation constants of the second cable pair 200 are substantially identical (γ3≈γ4), the crosstalk from the insulated conductors 1 and 4 of the first cable pair 100 to the insulated conductors 3 and 2 of the second cable pair 200 superposes in a way that U3=0 and U2=0. This is a positive effect for the data transmission cable 300.
The crosstalk between a common mode propagating in the first pair 100 with the common mode of the second pair 200 is discussed hereinbelow.
The operation of the first pair 100 in common mode results in the following voltages:
U
1(0)=U0 (5)
U
4(0)=U0 (6)
Assuming that γ1≈γ2 and γ3≈γ4, the interference voltages at insulated conductors 3 and 2 add up as indicated in the following equations:
This effect is reduced choosing the propagation constants of insulated conductors 1 and 4 different from those of insulated conductors 3 and 2 to limit the common mode crosstalk.
Moreover, the metallic foil 12 at least partially surrounding each insulated conductor 1-4 allows reducing this type of crosstalk.
The design parameters that may influence characteristic impedance and propagation constants of the insulated conductors 1-4 are: inner diameter di of the i-th cable, external diameter Di of the i-th cable and the effective dielectric constant εi, of the i-th insulation layer (in the present example, with i ranging from 1 to 4).
Defining the conductivity ki of the conductor material, e.g., the material of conductors 5, 7, 9 and 14, and the conductivity ka of the material of the metallic screen 11, the skin depth δi of the conductor and the skin depth δa of the metallic screen 11, can be calculated by the following equations:
where:
According to Kaden, H.: “Wirbelströme und Schirmung in der Nachrichten-technik”; Springer-Verlag, chapter L-3c, 1959 the frequency dependent resistance Ri of the conductor (one of the conductors 5, 7, 9 and 14) is:
where d is the outer diameter of the conductor.
For sufficiently high frequencies, e.g., of at least 5 MHz, and using the thickness s of the metallic foil 12, the frequency dependent resistance Ra of said metallic foil 12 is:
where s is the thickness of the metallic foil portion surrounding an insulated conductor, which, in view of the metallic foil thickness, is substantially similar to the outer diameter of the insulated conductor; and D is the outer diameter of the insulated conductor that can be used as an approximation of the diameter of the metallic layer of the screening tape that is formed around an insulated conductor. Only the metallic layer closest to the insulated conductor is to be considered.
To calculate the propagation constants, the inductance Li and capacitance Ci can be calculated as:
where:
Using these primary parameters and assuming dielectric losses can be neglected, the secondary transmission line parameters (characteristic impedance Z and propagation constant γ) can be calculated as:
The parameters di, Di and εi can be selected individually per insulated conductor 1-4. As already discussed, it can be assumed that for those insulated conductors 1-4 which form a balanced untwisted pair, these parameters are identical.
For high frequencies the characteristic impedance can be approximated as Z=√L/C. In order to achieve the same level of characteristic impedance for all 1-4 (comprising the metal foil 12 at least partially surrounding them) the capacitance of the insulated conductor i has to be set to Ci=Li(C1/L1) and can therefore be derived from the geometry parameters di, Di and εi.
As described in the above-mentioned Kaden, H., Chapter L.3.c, the transfer impedance ZT of each portion of metallic foil 12 surrounding one insulated conductor 1-4 (from an electrical point of view, the foil 12 can be considered individually) can be calculated from the geometry. This value of the transfer impedance ZT can be used as an approximation of the effective transfer impedance Rk as per equation 1:
where:
As an example,
As an example, from
Using the above described equations, a model to calculate the crosstalk between the insulated conductors 1-4 surrounded by the foil 12 can be obtained. Particularly, the far-end crosstalk according to equation (8) can be evaluated. Far-end crosstalk (ACR-F) is typically expressed in dB and is derived by subtracting the insertion loss (attenuation) of the disturbing pair from the Far End Crosstalk (FEXT) this pair induces in an adjacent pair.
The difference of the velocity of propagation (i.e., the skew) of the two cable pairs 100 and 200 can be related to the resulting ACR-F. Table 1 shows the respective values where the frequency independent plateau value of the ACR-F is used. According to the needs of the possible transmission scheme the necessary ACR-F can be realised by choosing the respective geometry parameters.
The following ranges of parameters could be suitable for an effective transmission cable:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102022000010544 | May 2022 | IT | national |