This application claims the priority of German Patent Application, Serial No. 103 43 341.4, filed Sep. 15, 2003, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates, in general, to the field of data transmission and to a method of transmitting data from a central station to a track-bound vehicle.
Nothing in the following discussion of the state of the art is to be construed as an admission of prior art.
Data between a track-bound vehicle and a central station is transmitted heretofore by so-called intermittent train control (intermittent ATC) or continuous automatic train control (continuous ATC). Intermittent automatic train control involves a transmission of data between the central station and a track-bound vehicle along a track at selected points with limited range. However, no data transmission is possible at locations along the track between individual points.
Continuous ATC provides a data transmission along the entire track between the railway vehicle and the central station. European Pat. No. EP 0 534 577 describes, for example, a continuous ATC, whereby a communication is established via track-side transmitting and receiving devices which are operatively connected with on-vehicle transmitting and receiving devices. Several track-side transmitting and receiving devices are hereby operated by a control computer which is in communication with a central station, for example a signal box or operations control station. In the event, the control computer crashes during operation, any communication between the track-side transmitting and receiving devices and the on-vehicle transmitting and receiving devices is interrupted. Trains that are affected by this breakdown are halted by the safety system, resulting in downtimes and delays. One approach to prevent such delays involves a doubling of all components, i.e. of the track-side transmitting and receiving devices as well as the associated control computers, so that a breakdown of one component can be compensated by the availability of the backup component.
It would be desirable and advantageous to provide an improved data transmission system to obviate prior art shortcomings and to maintain operation in a simple and yet reliable manner, even when a control computer crashes.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a data transmission system for transmitting data from a central station to a track-bound vehicle traveling on a track includes plural track-side transmitting and receiving devices communicating with an on-vehicle transmitting and receiving device, with each of the track-side transmitting and receiving devices operatively connected to at least two control computers for communication with the central station.
The present invention resolves prior art problems by operatively connecting two control computers with the track-side transmitting and receiving devices. As a consequence, one control computer is thus able to assume the functions of a crashed control computer.
According to another feature of the present invention, the track is subdivided in track sections, with each track section including a one of the control computers and a first plurality of the track-side transmitting and receiving devices, wherein the first plurality of the track-side transmitting and receiving devices is operatively connected to a one of the control computers associated to a neighboring one of the track sections. In this way, the operation of a crashed control computer in one track section can be assumed by a control computer of a neighboring track section, without significantly increasing costs and wiring.
According to another feature of the present invention, each track section has a bus for establishing a communication in the track section between the track-side transmitting and receiving devices and the one control computer, wherein the track-side transmitting and receiving devices have an interface to the bus, and wherein each of the control computers has a first interface to the bus of the associated track section and a second interface to the bus of a neighboring one of the track sections. Thus, each control computer is interfaced with two buses, with one bus connected to the track-side transmitting and receiving devices of the respective track section, and the other bus connected to the track-side transmitting and receiving devices of a neighboring track section. Suitably, each of the control computers has a third interface to the bus of the other neighboring track section, thereby enhancing the fail-safe operation of the data transmission system according to the present invention.
According to another feature of the present invention, each track section may have a bus for establishing a communication in the track section between the track-side transmitting and receiving devices and the associated control computer, wherein the control computers have each an interface to the bus of the associated track section, and wherein the track-side transmitting and receiving devices have a first interface to the bus of the associated track section and a second interface to the bus of a neighboring one of the track sections. In this configuration, each control computer has thus only one interface to a bus, whereas the track-side transmitting and receiving devices have two interfaces.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for transmitting data from a central station to a track-bound vehicle traveling on a track includes the steps of disposing along the track of the track-bound vehicle a plurality of track-side transmitting and receiving devices for communication with an on-vehicle transmitting and receiving device, operatively connecting at least two control computers to a central station, and connecting the track-side transmitting and receiving devices to the at least two control computers so that at a crash of one of the control computers communication of the pertaining track-side transmitting and receiving devices with the central station is maintained through intervention of the other one of the control computers.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent upon reading the following description of currently preferred exemplified embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
Throughout all the Figures, same or corresponding equipments are generally indicated by same reference numerals. These depicted embodiments are to be understood as illustrative of the invention and not as limiting in any way. It should also be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the embodiments are sometimes illustrated by graphic symbols, phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.
Turning now to the drawing, and in particular to
Further connected with the bus 4 of the track-side transmitting and receiving devices SPU in the track section B is the other control computer 3 which is also operatively connected to the central station 7. In this way, the control computer 3 is able to operate the track-side transmitting and receiving devices SPU in the track section B, in the event the control computer 2 crashes.
The control computer 3 is further interfaced with a bus 4 for operating the track-side transmitting and receiving devices SPU in the track section C.
By applying the illustrated circuit diagram and configuration along the entire track 1, each one of the control computers 2, 3 is thus interfaced with a bus 4 in the pertaining one of the track sections A, B, C, D as well as to the bus 4 in a neighboring one of the track sections A, B, C, D.
In accordance with the present invention, data transmission is maintained reliably even if one of the control computers 2, 3 crashes. In this case, a further neighboring control computer can assume the operation of the crashed control computer so that a vehicle 6 on the track 1 can proceed and there is no need to temporarily stop the vehicle 6.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in connection with currently preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and practical application to thereby enable a person skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 43 341 | Sep 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4641243 | Hartkopf et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
5420883 | Swensen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5533695 | Heggestad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5950966 | Hungate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6032905 | Haynie | Mar 2000 | A |
6556898 | Clawson | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7263475 | Hawthorne et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
24 02 932 | Jul 1975 | DE |
43 05 233 | Aug 1994 | DE |
197 21 246 | Nov 1998 | DE |
198 32 594 | Jan 2000 | DE |
0 534 577 | Dec 1995 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050060068 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |