This application claims priority to French Patent Application No. 0312091 filed on Oct. 16, 2003, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to improvements to life rafts launched by davit and comprising for this purpose hanging means able to be held in a hook suspended from the davit, these rafts being fitted out with equipment comprising at least one load that is heavy or heavier than the others.
The invention is concerned more specifically, though not exclusively, with life rafts of inflatable type in particular, and of large capacity, (e.g. from 12 to 50 or even more persons) particularly as installed in passenger ships (cruise ships, car ferries, and the like).
2. Description of the Prior Art
The raft is usually provided with survival equipment (survival hardware, food, drinks etc.) which, in the case of complete equipment (the so-called “A pack”), includes in particular 1.5 litres of water and 1 kg of food per person. The raft inflating device is also heavy. For a large-capacity raft (able to hold several dozen people), this equipment is heavy.
The equipment of the raft is divided into several loads enclosed in watertight bags arranged on the floor of the raft around the air float.
Not only are these different loads not generally all the same weight, some being much heavier than others, but also they cannot be distributed symmetrically around the perimeter of the bottom of the raft because, among other things, when the raft is stored in its container, certain parts of the equipment are grouped together in bags to facilitate the folding of the raft.
In addition, a davit-launched raft generally comprises slings distributed peripherally around the inflatable float, with the free end of each attached to a hanging member such as a shackle that can be held by the davit hook. The raft is folded in the uninflated state for packing in the container. In most folding methods specific to davit-launched rafts, the terminal portions of the slings, with the shackle where they are brought together, pass out of the tent or canopy covering the raft through an opening at the top of the tent. Furthermore, during folding, the shackle is positioned at the front of the folded raft, above the bags containing the equipment, so that once the raft is packed in its container, the shackle can easily be reached by opening a hatch in the wall of the container.
To deploy the raft, after the container hatch has been opened the shackle is hooked onto the davit hook, the davit raises the container, swings it over the sea and sets it level with the deck. The inflation of the raft is then started with the aid of a percussion halyard provided for this purpose: the container opens and releases the complete raft which, being not yet inflated to full pressure, initially appears like a “cone” suspended from the shackle, before gradually assuming its shape as inflation proceeds. Finally the inflated raft is suspended from a single point (the shackle) situated approximately vertically above the centre of the raft.
However, the asymmetry described above in the distribution of the equipment loads means that, because it is hung from a single central point, the raft is very unbalanced and therefore hangs at a considerable angle.
To make the concept clearer,
Inside the raft 1 are a number of different loads in the form of watertight bags 101, 102, . . . containing equipment, at least one of these loads 102 being much heavier than the other loads 101, . . . . These loads rest on the floor 3 against the float 2, without being distributed symmetrically. What is more, the raft inflating equipment (gas bottles 11), which is attached to the outside underneath the floor 3, is also heavy. The exigences of accessibility to at least some bags of equipment and hardware, etc. discussed above mean that among other things the bag containing the heaviest load 102 and the gas bottles 11 are situated roughly on the same side of the raft, in the vicinity of the entrance E.
As a result, the raft 1, suspended from the davit 7, leans sharply towards the heaviest load 102 and the angle α it forms with the horizontal is noticeable, even large as visible in
This angle is too large and the weight of the raft with all its loads 101, 102, . . . is so great that attempts to at least partly right the raft manually by pulling it with a halyard are useless.
This imbalance of the raft suspended from the halyard creates several problems.
The passengers get into the raft when the raft, suspended over the sea under the davit, is level with the deck. If the raft is sloping as shown in
Besides this, davits are usually pivoting, as illustrated in
It should also be emphasized that these difficulties of manoeuvring the raft with the aid of the davit are considerably amplified if the ship has been damaged (according to SOLAS Rules, the use of davit-launched rafts must be possible when the ship has a list of 10° to one side or the other and/or a trim of 20° fore or aft).
Also, if the initial angle of the raft is not compensated for by the davit raising the raft, the edge of the raft containing the entrance E is situated someway below the ship's deck. The first people then have to jump from the ship into the raft, a difficult, not to say perilous exercise with a choppy sea and/or a violent wind. Once again, the boarding operation is slowed down.
Lastly, the series of operations required to raise the inclined empty raft to get it level with the edge of the ship's deck, and afterwards to lower it once it is balanced by the first people having got inside it, requires the crew to know what manoeuvres are going on and demands special training.
To conclude, it should be emphasized that the current tendency is to fit ships out with rafts of ever larger capacity to compensate for the numerical reductions in crew sizes (each raft put into the water has to have at least one crew member in command of it). This increased raft capacity has led to large dimensions and increased equipment loads (especially of survival rations) arranged around the edge of the raft, causing the tilting torque of such rafts when suspended from a single central point to be greater and its inclination when empty to become very considerable. This makes the difficulties described above even more critical.
It is an object of the invention to provide a novel solution that will eliminate at least the greater part of the disadvantages described above encountered with current life raft designs and that will enable a raft hoisted by a davit to occupy a much more horizontal position.
To these ends, the life raft as described in the preamble is characterized, when fitted out in accordance with the invention, in that the heavy load or at least the heaviest load of the equipment is attached to said raft hanging means.
In this way, the heavy load or at least the heaviest load is physically detached from the raft with which it is no longer in contact once the raft is inflated and suspended from the davit, so that the raft is much better balanced and can occupy a much more horizontal position. Being suspended from the raft hanging means, this heavy load or the heaviest load nonetheless remains above the raft during the manoeuvres and drops back into it once the raft is in the water and released from the davit hook.
The solution put forward in accordance with the invention therefore makes it possible to keep the raft in a correct situation, leading to a rapid boarding process and does not have special requirements in terms of hardware, particularly davits. Nor does it require any additional work by the crew members, or an additional training of them.
Where the equipment is distributed in several heavy loads, some of which are much heavier than the others, the heaviest loads are attached to the raft hanging means.
In practice, the raft hanging means generally include several slings brought together at a shackle that can be held by a hook suspended from the davit and the heaviest load or loads are attached to the shackle.
The provisions of the invention are particularly useful in their application to life rafts of large, even very large capacity which are more sensitive to unbalanced loads when hanging from the launching davit, and the invention is consequently of particularly useful application to inflatable life rafts.
A clearer understanding of the invention will be gained on reading the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment presented by way of example only, for purely illustrative purposes, shown in
For example, in the typical example of a raft with a 37-person capacity, its total empty weight is about 240 kg (without the container); the survival rations (1.5 l of water and 0.5 kg of food per person) weigh a total of 74 kg, which is approximately 30% of the raft's mass. The bag or bag containing these rations, being suspended from the shackle, no longer contribute to the imbalance of the empty raft.
As illustrated in
If the equipment of the raft is distributed in the form of loads, several of which are significantly heavier than the others, these heavier loads are all hung on the shackle 5 (as illustrated by the load 103 hung on the shackle 5).
As a variant, the load 103 is shown suspended from the shackle 5 by means of a strap 13 which passes through the free-sliding shackle and is attached to the raft, for example at a point on a float, so that when the strap is set at the appropriate length, the load 103 is automatically raised above the raft when the raft is inflated.
The provisions of the invention remove the problems discussed in the preamble, yet without any great complication or significant additional cost to the raft thus equipped. Moreover, with an arrangement in accordance with the invention, the raft folding procedure, by which it is packed into the container, is very little changed from that practised hitherto, the equipment loads still being kept close to the hatch provided in the wall of the container to allow access to the shackle that goes on the davit hook.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03 12091 | Oct 2003 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2970324 | Phillips | Feb 1961 | A |
3222700 | Smith | Dec 1965 | A |
4364326 | Pike | Dec 1982 | A |
4406244 | Buchan et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
5791281 | Davidson | Aug 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2123353 | Feb 1984 | GB |
WO 9730891 | Aug 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050112963 A1 | May 2005 | US |