DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes

Abstract
Described tools and techniques relate to signaling for DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes. The techniques and tools can be used in combination or independently. For example, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a VLC that indicates a DC differential for a DC coefficient, a FLC that indicates a value refinement for the DC differential, and a third code that indicates the sign for the DC differential. Even with the small quantization step sizes, the tool uses a VLC table with DC differentials for DC coefficients above the small quantization step sizes. The FLCs for DC differentials have lengths that vary depending on quantization step size.
Description
COPYRIGHT AUTHORIZATION

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by any one of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to video and other digital media coding and decoding, and more particularly relates to signaling DC coefficients in video and other digital media coding and decoding.


BACKGROUND

With the increased popularity of DVDs, music delivery over the Internet, and digital cameras, digital media have become commonplace. Engineers use a variety of techniques to process digital audio, video, and images efficiently while still maintaining quality. To understand these techniques, it helps to understand how the audio, video, and image information is represented and processed in a computer.


I. Representation of Media Information in a Computer

A computer processes media information as a series of numbers representing that information. For example, a single number may represent the intensity of brightness or the intensity of a color component such as red, green or blue for each elementary small region of a picture, so that the digital representation of the picture consists of one or more arrays of such numbers. Each such number may be referred to as a sample. For a color image, it is conventional to use more than one sample to represent the color of each elemental region, and typically three samples are used. The set of these samples for an elemental region may be referred to as a pixel, where the word “pixel” is a contraction referring to the concept of a “picture element.” For example, one pixel may consist of three samples that represent the intensity of red, green and blue light necessary to represent the elemental region. Such a pixel type is referred to as an RGB pixel. Several factors affect quality, including sample depth, resolution, and frame rate (for video).


Sample depth is a property normally measured in bits that indicates the range of numbers that can be used to represent a sample. When more values are possible for the sample, quality can be higher because the number can capture more subtle variations in intensity and/or a greater range of values. Images with higher resolution tend to look crisper than other images and contain more discernable useful details. Video with higher frame rate tends to mimic the smooth motion of natural objects better than other video, and can similarly be considered to contain more detail in the temporal dimension. For all of these factors, the tradeoff for high quality is the cost of storing and transmitting the information in terms of the bit rate necessary to represent the sample depth, resolution and frame rate, as Table 1 shows.









TABLE 1







Bit rates for different quality levels of raw video











Resolution




Bits Per Pixel
(in pixels,
Frame Rate
Bit Rate


(sample depth times
Width ×
(in frames
(in millions of


samples per pixel)
Height)
per second)
bits per second)













8 (value 0-255,
160 × 120
7.5
1.2


monochrome)





24 (value 0-255, RGB)
320 × 240
15
27.6


24 (value 0-255, RGB)
640 × 480
30
221.2


24 (value 0-255, RGB)
1280 × 720 
60
1327.1









Despite the high bit rate necessary for sending high quality video (such as HDTV), companies and consumers increasingly depend on computers to create, distribute, and play back high quality content. For this reason, engineers use compression (also called source coding or source encoding) to reduce the bit rate of digital media. Compression decreases the cost of storing and transmitting the information by converting the information into a lower bit rate form. Decompression (also called decoding) reconstructs a version of the original information from the compressed form. A “codec” is an encoder/decoder system. Two categories of compression are lossless compression and lossy compression.


Lossless compression reduces the bit rate of information by removing redundancy from the information without any reduction in fidelity. For example, a series often consecutive pixels that are all exactly the same shade of red could be represented as a code for the particular shade of red and the number ten as a “run length” of consecutive pixels, and this series can be perfectly reconstructed by decompression from the code for the shade of red and the indicated number (ten) of consecutive pixels having that shade of red. Lossless compression techniques reduce bit rate at no cost to quality, but can only reduce bit rate up to a certain point. Decreases in bit rate are limited by the inherent amount of variability in the statistical characterization of the input data, which is referred to as the source entropy. Entropy coding is another term for lossless compression.


In contrast, with lossy compression, the quality suffers somewhat but the achievable decrease in bit rate is more dramatic. For example, a series of ten pixels, each being a slightly different shade of red, can be approximated as ten pixels with exactly the same particular approximate red color. Lossy compression techniques can be used to reduce bit rate more than lossless compression techniques, but some of the reduction in bit rate is achieved by reducing quality, and the lost quality cannot be completely recovered. Lossy compression is often used in conjunction with lossless compression—in a system design in which the lossy compression establishes an approximation of the information and lossless compression techniques are applied to represent the approximation. For example, the series often pixels, each a slightly different shade of red, can be represented as a code for one particular shade of red and the number ten as a run-length of consecutive pixels. In decompression, the original series would then be reconstructed as ten pixels with the same approximated red color.


II. Quantization

According to one possible definition, quantization is a term used for an approximating non-reversible mapping function commonly used for lossy compression, in which there is a specified set of possible output values, and each member of the set of possible output values has an associated set of input values that result in the selection of that particular output value. A variety of quantization techniques have been developed, including scalar or vector, uniform or non-uniform, and adaptive or non-adaptive quantization.


A. Scalar Quantizers


According to one possible definition, a scalar quantizer is an approximating functional mapping x→Q[x] of an input value x to a quantized value Q[x]. FIG. 1 shows a “staircase” I/O function (100) for a scalar quantizer. The horizontal axis is a number line for a real number input variable x, and the vertical axis indicates the corresponding quantized values Q[x]. The number line is partitioned by thresholds such as the threshold (110). Each value of x within a given range between a pair of adjacent thresholds is assigned the same quantized value Q[x]. For example, each value of x within the range (120) is assigned the same quantized value (130). (At a threshold, one of the two possible quantized values is assigned to an input x, depending on the system.) Overall, the quantized values Q[x] exhibit a discontinuous, staircase pattern. The distance the mapping continues along the number line depends on the system, typically ending after a finite number of thresholds. The placement of the thresholds on the number line may be uniformly spaced (as shown in FIG. 1) or non-uniformly spaced.


A scalar quantizer can be decomposed into two distinct stages. The first stage is the classifier stage, in which a classifier function mapping x→A[x] maps an input x to a quantization index A[x], which is often integer-valued. In essence, the classifier segments an input number line or data set. FIG. 2a shows a generalized classifier (200) and thresholds for a scalar quantizer. As in FIG. 1, a number line for a real number variable x is segmented by thresholds such as the threshold (210). Each value of x within a given range such as the range (220) is assigned the same quantized value Q[x]. FIG. 2b shows a numerical example of a classifier (250) and thresholds for a scalar quantizer.


In the second stage, a reconstructor functional mapping k→β[k] maps each quantization index k to a reconstruction value β[k]. In essence, the reconstructor places steps having a particular height relative to the input number line segments (or selects a subset of data set values) for reconstruction of each region determined by the classifier. The reconstructor functional mapping may be implemented, for example, using a lookup table. Overall, the classifier relates to the reconstructor as follows:

Q[x]=β[A[x]]  (1).


The distortion introduced by using such a quantizer may be computed with a difference-based distortion measure d(x−Q[x]). Typically, such a distortion measure has the property that d(x−Q[x]) increases as x−Q[x] deviates from zero; and typically each reconstruction value lies within the range of the corresponding classification region, so that the straight line that would be formed by the functional equation Q[x]=x will pass through every step of the staircase diagram (as shown in FIG. 1) and therefore Q[Q[x]] will typically be equal to Q[x]. In general, a quantizer is considered better in rate-distortion terms if the quantizer results in a lower average value of distortion than other quantizers for a given bit rate of output. More formally, a quantizer is considered better if, for a source random variable X, the expected (i.e., the average or statistical mean) value of the distortion measure D=Ex{d(X−Q[X])} is lower for an equal or lower entropy H of A[X]. The most commonly-used distortion measure is the squared error distortion measure, for which d(|x−y|)=|x−y|2. When the squared error distortion measure is used, the expected value of the distortion measure (D) is referred to as the mean squared error.


B. Dead Zone+Uniform Threshold Quantizers


According to one possible definition, a dead zone plus uniform threshold quantizer [“DZ+UTQ” ] is a quantizer with uniformly spaced threshold values for all classifier regions except the one containing the zero input value (which is called the dead zone [“DZ” ]). A DZ+UTQ has a classifier index mapping rule x→A[x] that can be expressed based on two parameters. FIG. 3 shows a staircase I/O function (300) for a DZ+UTQ, and FIG. 4a shows a generalized classifier (400) and thresholds for a DZ+UTQ. The parameter s, which is greater than 0, indicates the step size for all steps other than the DZ. Mathematically, all s, are equal to s for i≠0. The parameter z, which is greater than or equal to 0, indicates the ratio of the DZ size to the size of the other steps. Mathematically, s0=z·s. In FIG. 4a, z is 2, so the DZ is twice as wide as the other classification zones. The index mapping rule x→A[x] for a DZ+UTQ can be expressed as:











A


[
x
]


=


sign


(
x
)


*

max


(

0
,






x


s

-

z
2

+
1




)




,




(
2
)








where └⋅┘ denotes the smallest integer less than or equal to the argument and where sign(x) is the function defined as:










sign


(
x
)


=

{






+
1

,






for





x


0

,







-
1

,





for





x

<
0




.







(
3
)

.








FIG. 4b shows a numerical example of a classifier (450) and thresholds for a DZ+UTQ with s=1 and z=2. FIGS. 1, 2a, and 2b show a special case DZ+UTQ with z=1. Quantizers of the UTQ form have good performance for a variety of statistical sources. In particular, the DZ+UTQ form is optimal for the statistical random variable source known as the Laplacian source.


In some system designs (not shown), an additional consideration may be necessary to fully characterize a DZ+UTQ classification rule. For practical reasons there may be a need to limit the range of values that can result from the classification function A[x] to some reasonable finite range. This limitation is referred to as clipping. For example, in some such systems the classification rule could more precisely be defined as:











A


[
x
]


=


sign


(
x
)


*

min


[

g
,

max


(

0
,






x


s

-

z
2

+
1




)



]




,




(
4
)








where g is a limit on the absolute value of A[x]. In much of the theoretical analysis presented herein, consideration of clipping is omitted as it unduly complicates the analysis without advancing the explanation. Moreover, although the clipping shown in the above example is symmetric about zero, the clipping does not need to be symmetric, and often is not exactly symmetric. For example, a common clipping range would be such that the value of A[x] is limited to some range from −2B to +2B−1 so that A[x] can be represented as an integer using a two's complement representation that uses B+1 bits, where B+1 may be equal to 8 or 16 or another particular selected number of bits.


C. Reconstruction Rules


Different reconstruction rules may be used to determine the reconstruction value for each quantization index. These include the optimal reconstruction rule and the single offset reconstruction rule (of which the mid-point reconstruction rule is an example). FIG. 5 shows reconstruction points according to different reconstruction rules for a particular shape of a source probability distribution function ƒ(x). For a range of values between two thresholds tj and tj+1, the reconstruction value rj,mid according to the mid-point reconstruction rule bisects the range (thus, rj,mid=(tj+tj+1)/2). For the example probability distribution function shown in FIG. 5, this fails to account for the fact that values to the left of the mid-point are more likely than values to the right of the mid-point. The reconstruction value rj,opt according to the optimal reconstruction rule accounts for the probability distribution.


In general, a probability distribution function [“pdf”] indicates the probabilities for the different values of a variable. One possible definition of the optimal reconstruction value rj,opt for each region between two neighboring thresholds tj and tj+1 for a pdf ƒ(x) can be expressed as:










r

j
,
opt


=



min
y


-
1







t
j


t

j
+
1






d


(

x
-
y

)




f


(
x
)








dx
.








(
5
)








Assuming that the pdf ƒ(x) for a given source is symmetric around zero, one possible definition of the optimal reconstruction rule of a DZ+UTQ for a symmetric, difference-based distortion measure d(|x−y|) is:










β


[
k
]


=

{








min
y


-
1






0


z





s

2





[


d


(



x
-
y



)


+

d


(



y
-
x



)



]



f


(
x
)







dx



,






for





k

=
0

,








sign


(
k
)










min

y


-
1









z





s

2

+


(



k


-
1

)


s





z





s

2

+



k



s






d


(



x
-
y



)




f


(
x
)







dx



,





for





k


0




.







(
6
)

,








where y is the quantized value Q[x], and where the rule finds the quantized value Q[x] that results in the smallest distortion according to the distortion measure. Typically, the optimal quantized value for β[0] is equal to 0, and that will be assumed to be true for the remainder of this description. For minimizing mean squared error, the optimal reconstruction rule sets the reconstruction value for each region equal to the conditional mean of the input values in that region. Stated more precisely, the optimal reconstruction value rj,opt for the region between two neighboring thresholds tj and tj+1 for a pdf ƒ(x) when using the mean squared error distortion measure is given by










r

j
,
opt


=






t
j


t

j
+
1






x
·

f


(
x
)




dx






t
j


t

j
+
1






f


(
x
)



dx



.





(
7
)







According to one possible definition for a DZ+UTQ, the single-offset reconstruction rule is based on an offset parameter Δ, where ordinarily 0<Δ≤s/2, and the rule is:










β


[
k
]


=

{





0
,






for





k

=
0

,








sign


(
k
)




[



(



k


+

z
2

-
1

)


s

+
Δ

]


,





for





k


0




.







(
8
)

.







The mid-point reconstruction rule is a special case of the single-offset reconstruction rule, specified by Δ=s/2. Mid-point reconstruction is commonly used for convenience due to its simplicity. And, in the limit as s becomes very small, the performance of the mid-point rule becomes optimal under a variety of well-behaved mathematical conditions.


D. Specifying Reconstruction Values, Constructing Classifiers


Standards and product specifications that focus only on achieving interoperability will often specify reconstruction values without necessarily specifying the classification rule. In other words, some specifications may define the functional mapping k→β[k] without defining the functional mapping x→A[x]. This allows a decoder built to comply with the standard/specification to reconstruct information correctly. In contrast, encoders are often given the freedom to change the classifier in any way that they wish, while still complying with the standard/specification.


Numerous systems for adjusting quantization thresholds have been developed. Many standards and products specify reconstruction values that correspond to a typical mid-point reconstruction rule (e.g., for a typical simple classification rule) for the sake of simplicity. For classification, however, the thresholds can in fact be adjusted so that certain input values will be mapped to more common (and hence, lower bit rate) indices, which makes the reconstruction values closer to optimal. FIG. 6 shows such adjusted thresholds for a classifier (600). The original thresholds (such as old tj) are situated halfway between the reconstruction points. The thresholds are moved outward on the number line, away from 0. Before the adjustment, a marginal value (shown between the old tj and the new tj) is mapped to rj. After the adjustment, the marginal value is mapped to r0. The decoder performs reconstruction without knowledge of the adjustments done in the encoder.


For optimal encoding, an encoder may adjust quantization thresholds to optimally fit a given set of reconstruction values q follows. The probability pj for the source random variable X to fall within a range j between tj and tj+1 (where tj+1>tj) for a source pdf ƒ(x) is:











p
j

=




t
j


t

j
+
1






f


(
x
)



dx



,




(
9
)








and the number of bits necessary to represent an event with probability pj in an ideal lossless communication system may be quantified as:











h
j

=


log
2



1

p
j




,




(
10
)








where the hj is expressed in terms of bits. The total entropy of the classifier is then given by









H
=



j





p
j

·

h
j








bits
.







(
11
)







In general, if the encoder is required to use b bits to indicate the selection of the reconstruction value rj, the encoder may evaluate and optimize its thresholds according to minimization of the rate-distortion relation D+λR, where D indicates distortion, R indicates bit usage, and X is a tuning parameter for favoring a particular selected balance between distortion and bit rate. For each particular threshold tj+1 between two points rj and rj+1, the encoder can set tj+1 to the x that satisfies:

d(x−rj)+λbj=d(x−rj+1)+λbj+1  (12).


In an ideal design, bj will be approximately equal to hj, and modern lossless coding techniques can be used to very nearly achieve this goal. In a design using some non-ideal lossless coding technique to represent the output of the classifier, bj may have some other value.


Note in summation that optimal decision thresholds can be selected using equation (12), that optimal reconstruction values can be selected using equation (5) or (7), and that optimal bit usage can be computed by setting bj equal to hj as given by equation (10) or to the number of bits used in some other lossless code (such as a Huffman code designed using equation (9) or a fixed-length code). In some highly-optimized scalar quantizer system designs, reconstruction values (initially uniformly spaced) are analyzed to adjust thresholds in encoder analysis, then use of the adjusted thresholds is analyzed to set the number of bits needed to represent the output of the classifier using lossless coding and to set the reconstruction values in decoder analysis. The new reconstruction values are then analyzed to adjust thresholds, and so on, until the thresholds and/or reconstruction values stabilize across iterations.


III. Compression and Decompression Systems

In general, video compression techniques include “intra-picture” compression and “inter-picture” compression, where a picture is, for example, a progressively scanned video frame, an interlaced video frame (having alternating lines for video fields), or an interlaced video field. For progressive frames, intra-picture compression techniques compress individual frames (typically called I-frames or key frames), and inter-picture compression techniques compress frames (typically called predicted frames, P-frames, or B-frames) with reference to preceding and/or following frames (typically called reference or anchor frames).


Both intra and inter-picture compression techniques often use a reversible frequency transform operation, which generates a set of frequency domain (i.e., spectral) coefficients. For intra-picture compression, the transform is typically applied to a block of samples. For inter-picture compression, the transform is typically applied to a block of motion-compensation prediction residual information. A discrete cosine transform [“DCT” ] is a type of frequency transform. The resulting blocks of transform coefficients are quantized and entropy encoded. A decoder typically entropy decodes and reconstructs transform coefficients (e.g., DCT coefficients) that were quantized and performs an inverse frequency transform such as an IDCT.


A. Intra-Compression in Windows Media Video, Version 8 [“WMV8”]


Microsoft Corporation's Windows Media Video, Version 8 [“WMV8” ] includes a video encoder and a video decoder. The WMV8 encoder uses intra-frame and inter-frame compression, and the WMV8 decoder uses intra-frame and inter-frame decompression.



FIG. 7 illustrates block-based intraframe compression (700) of a 8×8 block (705) of samples in a frame in the WMV8 encoder. The WMV8 encoder here splits a frame into 8×8 blocks of samples and applies an 8×8 DCT (710) to individual blocks such as the block (705). The encoder quantizes (720) the DCT coefficients (715), resulting in an 8×8 block of quantized DCT coefficients (725). For example, the encoder applies a uniform, scalar quantization step size to each coefficient.


Further encoding varies depending on whether a coefficient is a DC coefficient, an AC coefficient in the top row or left column, or another AC coefficient. The encoder encodes the DC coefficient (726) as a differential from the DC coefficient (736) of a neighboring 8×8 block, which is a previously encoded top or left neighbor block. The encoder entropy encodes (740) the differential. The entropy encoder can encode the left column or top row of AC coefficients as differentials from a corresponding column or row of a neighboring 8×8 block. FIG. 7 shows the left column (727) of AC coefficients encoded as differentials (747) from the left column (737) of the neighboring (actually situated to the left) block (735). The encoder scans (750) the 8×8 block (745) of predicted, quantized AC DCT coefficients into a one-dimensional array (755) and then entropy encodes the scanned coefficients using a variation of run length coding (760). The encoder selects an entropy code from one or more run/level/last tables (765) and outputs the entropy code.


A WMV8 decoder (not shown) produces a reconstructed version of the original block (705). The decoder determines the DC predictor for the DC coefficient and decodes the DC differential. In particular, the following pseudocode illustrates the DC differential decoding process in WMV8.

    • DCDifferential=vlc_decode( )
    • if (DCDifferential=ESCAPECODE)
      • DCDifferential=flc_decode(8)
    • DCSign=flc_decode(1)
    • if (DCSign==1)
      • DCDifferential=−DCDifferential


The WMV8 decoder combines the DC differential with the predictor for the DC coefficient to reconstruct the DC coefficient. The decoder entropy decodes the AC coefficients using one or more run/level/last tables, and scans the coefficients back into a two-dimensional array. The WMV decoder computes a predictor for the top row or left column of AC coefficients if appropriate. The decoder inverse quantizes the coefficients and performs an IDCT.


While DC differential coding and decoding as in WMV8 provide good performance in many scenarios, there are opportunities for improvement. In particular, DC differential coding and decoding as in WMV8 are not easily applied for smaller quantization sizes. This is because at the smaller quantization sizes, VLC code table size for DC differentials becomes inefficiently large for many devices for practical applications.


B. Video Codec Standards


Various standards specify aspects of video decoders as well as formats for compressed video information. These standards include H.261, MPEG-1, H.262 (also called MPEG-2), H.263, and MPEG-4. Directly or by implication, these standards may specify certain encoder details, but other encoder details are not specified. Different standards incorporate different techniques, but each standard typically specifies some kind of inverse frequency transform and entropy decoding. For information, see the respective standard documents.


SUMMARY

Described tools and techniques relate to coding of DC coefficients in video and other digital media coding. More particularly, the techniques and tools relate to signaling for DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes. The techniques and tools can be used in combination or independently.


According to a first set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a first code that indicates a DC differential for a DC coefficient and a second code that indicates a value refinement for the DC differential. For example, a video encoder encodes the DC coefficient based at least in part on the first and second codes. Or, a video decoder reconstructs the DC coefficient during decoding based at least in part on the first and second codes.


According to a second set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a VLC for a first DC differential for a first DC coefficient at a first quantization step size. The tool uses a VLC table that indicates DC differentials for DC coefficients at and above a second quantization step size larger than the first quantization step size.


According to a third set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a code for a DC differential for a DC coefficient, where the code is a FLC having a length that varies depending on quantization step size. For example, the FLC indicates a refinement value for the DC differential. Or, when an escape code is used for the DC differential, the FLC indicates a value for the DC differential.


Additional features and advantages will be made apparent from the following detailed description of various embodiments that proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a chart showing a staircase I/O function for a scalar quantizer according to the prior art.



FIGS. 2a and 2b are charts showing classifiers and thresholds for scalar quantizers according to the prior art.



FIG. 3 is a chart showing a staircase I/O function for a DZ+UTQ according to the prior art.



FIGS. 4a and 4b are charts showing classifiers and thresholds for DZ+UTQs according to the prior art.



FIG. 5 is a chart showing reconstruction points for different reconstruction rules for a given pdf shape according to the prior art.



FIG. 6 is a chart showing adjustments to a classifier for a scalar quantizer according to the prior art.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing block-based intra-compression according to the prior art.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a suitable computing environment in which several described embodiments may be implemented.



FIGS. 9 and 10 are block diagrams of a video encoder system and a video decoder system, respectively, in conjunction with which several described embodiments may be implemented.



FIGS. 11A-11D are diagrams for different syntax layers of a bitstream.



FIG. 12 is a listing of DC differential decoding pseudocode.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Described embodiments relate to techniques and tools for signaling DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes. The various techniques and tools can be used in combination or independently.


I. Computing Environment


FIG. 8 illustrates a generalized example of a suitable computing environment (800) in which several of the described embodiments may be implemented. The computing environment (800) is not intended to suggest any limitation as to scope of use or functionality, as the techniques and tools may be implemented in diverse general-purpose or special-purpose computing environments.


With reference to FIG. 8, the computing environment (800) includes at least one processing unit (810) and memory (820). In FIG. 8, this most basic configuration (830) is included within a dashed line. The processing unit (810) executes computer-executable instructions and may be a real or a virtual processor. In a multi-processing system, multiple processing units execute computer-executable instructions to increase processing power. The memory (820) may be volatile memory (e.g., registers, cache, RAM), non-volatile memory (e.g., ROM, EEPROM, flash memory, etc.), or some combination of the two. The memory (820) stores software (880) implementing an encoder and/or decoder with special signaling of DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes.


A computing environment may have additional features. For example, the computing environment (800) includes storage (840), one or more input devices (850), one or more output devices (860), and one or more communication connections (870). An interconnection mechanism (not shown) such as a bus, controller, or network interconnects the components of the computing environment (800). Typically, operating system software (not shown) provides an operating environment for other software executing in the computing environment (800), and coordinates activities of the components of the computing environment (800).


The storage (840) may be removable or non-removable, and includes magnetic disks, magnetic tapes or cassettes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed within the computing environment (800). The storage (840) stores instructions for the software (880) implementing the encoder and/or decoder.


The input device(s) (850) may be a touch input device such as a keyboard, mouse, pen, or trackball, a voice input device, a scanning device, or another device that provides input to the computing environment (800). For audio or video encoding, the input device(s) (850) may be a sound card, video card, TV tuner card, or similar device that accepts audio or video input in analog or digital form, or a CD-ROM or CD-RW that reads audio or video samples into the computing environment (800). The output device(s) (860) may be a display, printer, speaker, CD-writer, or another device that provides output from the computing environment (800).


The communication connection(s) (870) enable communication over a communication medium to another computing entity. The communication medium conveys information such as computer-executable instructions, audio or video input or output, or other data in a modulated data signal. A modulated data signal is a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired or wireless techniques implemented with an electrical, optical, RF, infrared, acoustic, or other carrier.


The techniques and tools can be described in the general context of computer-readable media. Computer-readable media are any available media that can be accessed within a computing environment. By way of example, and not limitation, with the computing environment (800), computer-readable media include memory (820), storage (840), communication media, and combinations of any of the above.


The techniques and tools can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as those included in program modules, being executed in a computing environment on a target real or virtual processor. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, libraries, objects, classes, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or split between program modules as desired in various embodiments. Computer-executable instructions for program modules may be executed within a local or distributed computing environment.


II. Video Encoder and Decoder


FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a generalized video encoder system (900), and FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a video decoder system (1000), in conjunction with which various described embodiments may be implemented.


The relationships shown between modules within the encoder and decoder indicate the main flow of information in the encoder and decoder; other relationships are not shown for the sake of simplicity. In particular, FIGS. 9 and 10 usually do not show side information indicating the encoder settings, modes, tables, etc. used for a video sequence, frame, macroblock, block, etc. Such side information is sent in the output bitstream, typically after entropy encoding of the side information. The format of the output bitstream can be a Windows Media Video version 9 or other format.


The encoder (900) and decoder (1000) are block-based and use a 4:2:0 macroblock format, with each macroblock including four 8×8 luminance blocks (at times treated as one 16×16 macroblock) and two 8×8 chrominance blocks. Alternatively, the encoder (900) and decoder (1000) are object-based, use a different macroblock or block format, or perform operations on sets of pixels of different size or configuration than 8×8 blocks and 16×16 macroblocks.


Depending on implementation and the type of compression desired, modules of the encoder or decoder can be added, omitted, split into multiple modules, combined with other modules, and/or replaced with like modules. In alternative embodiments, encoders or decoders with different modules and/or other configurations of modules perform one or more of the described techniques.


A. Video Encoder



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a general video encoder system (900) that can perform joint entropy coding and bitstream formation operations for variable-size transform information. The encoder system (900) receives a sequence of video frames including a current frame (905), and produces compressed video information (995) as output. Particular embodiments of video encoders typically use a variation or supplemented version of the generalized encoder (900).


The encoder system (900) compresses predicted frames and key frames. For the sake of presentation, FIG. 9 shows a path for key frames through the encoder system (900) and a path for forward-predicted frames. Many of the components of the encoder system (900) are used for compressing both key frames and predicted frames. The exact operations performed by those components can vary depending on the type of information being compressed.


A predicted frame (also called p-frame, b-frame for bi-directional prediction, or inter-coded frame) is represented in terms of prediction (or difference) from one or more other frames. A prediction residual is the difference between what was predicted and the original frame. In contrast, a key frame (also called an I-frame or intra-coded frame) is compressed without reference to other frames.


If the current frame (905) is a forward-predicted frame, a motion estimator (910) estimates motion of macroblocks or other sets of pixels of the current frame (905) with respect to a reference frame, which is a reconstructed previous frame (925) buffered in the frame store (920). In alternative embodiments, the reference frame is a later frame or the current frame is bi-directionally predicted. The motion estimator (910) can estimate motion by pixel, ½ pixel, ¼ pixel, or other increments, and can switch the precision of the motion estimation on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. The precision of the motion estimation can be the same or different horizontally and vertically. The motion estimator (910) outputs as side information motion information (915) such as motion vectors. A motion compensator (930) applies the motion information (915) to the reconstructed previous frame (925) to form a motion-compensated current frame (935). The prediction is rarely perfect, however, and the difference between the motion-compensated current frame (935) and the original current frame (905) is the prediction residual (945). Alternatively, a motion estimator and motion compensator apply another type of motion estimation/compensation.


For DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes, the encoder signals DC coefficients using a syntax and code tables such as those described below. In particular, the encoder uses the code tables and produces an output bitstream in compliance with the syntax below.


A frequency transformer (960) converts the spatial domain video information into frequency domain (i.e., spectral) data. For block-based video frames, the frequency transformer (960) applies a DCT or variant of DCT to blocks of the pixel data or prediction residual data, producing blocks of DCT coefficients. Alternatively, the frequency transformer (960) applies another conventional frequency transform such as a Fourier transform or uses wavelet or subband analysis. In embodiments in which the encoder uses spatial extrapolation (not shown in FIG. 9) to encode blocks of key frames, the frequency transformer (960) can apply a re-oriented frequency transform such as a skewed DCT to blocks of prediction residuals for the key frame. The frequency transformer (960) applies an 8×8, 8×4, 4×8, or other size frequency transforms (e.g., DCT) to prediction residuals for predicted frames.


A quantizer (970) then quantizes the blocks of spectral data coefficients. The quantizer applies uniform, scalar quantization to the spectral data with a step-size that varies on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. Alternatively, the quantizer applies another type of quantization to the spectral data coefficients, for example, a non-uniform, vector, or non-adaptive quantization, or directly quantizes spatial domain data in an encoder system that does not use frequency transformations. In addition to adaptive quantization, the encoder (900) can use frame dropping, adaptive filtering, or other techniques for rate control.


If a given macroblock in a predicted frame has no information of certain types (e.g., no motion information for the macroblock and no residual information), the encoder (900) may encode the macroblock as a skipped macroblock. If so, the encoder signals the skipped macroblock in the output bitstream of compressed video information (995).


When a reconstructed current frame is needed for subsequent motion estimation/compensation, an inverse quantizer (976) performs inverse quantization on the quantized spectral data coefficients. An inverse frequency transformer (966) then performs the inverse of the operations of the frequency transformer (960), producing a reconstructed prediction residual (for a predicted frame) or reconstructed samples (for an intra-coded frame). If the frame (905) being encoded is an intra-coded frame, then the reconstructed samples form the reconstructed current frame (not shown). If the frame (905) being encoded is a predicted frame, the reconstructed prediction residual is added to the motion-compensated predictions (935) to form the reconstructed current frame. The frame store (920) buffers the reconstructed current frame for use in predicting a next frame. In some embodiments, the encoder applies a deblocking filter to the reconstructed frame to adaptively smooth discontinuities between the blocks of the frame.


The entropy coder (980) compresses the output of the quantizer (970) as well as certain side information (e.g., motion information (915), spatial extrapolation modes, quantization step size). Typical entropy coding techniques include arithmetic coding, differential coding, Huffman coding, run length coding, LZ coding, dictionary coding, and combinations of the above. The entropy coder (980) typically uses different coding techniques for different kinds of information (e.g., DC coefficients, AC coefficients, different kinds of side information), and can choose from among multiple code tables within a particular coding technique.


The entropy coder (980) puts compressed video information (995) in the buffer (990). A buffer level indicator is fed back to bit rate adaptive modules. The compressed video information (995) is depleted from the buffer (990) at a constant or relatively constant bit rate and stored for subsequent streaming at that bit rate. Therefore, the level of the buffer (990) is primarily a function of the entropy of the filtered, quantized video information, which affects the efficiency of the entropy coding. Alternatively, the encoder system (900) streams compressed video information immediately following compression, and the level of the buffer (990) also depends on the rate at which information is depleted from the buffer (990) for transmission.


Before or after the buffer (990), the compressed video information (995) can be channel coded for transmission over the network. The channel coding can apply error detection and correction data to the compressed video information (995).


B. Video Decoder



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a general video decoder system (1000). The decoder system (1000) receives information (1095) for a compressed sequence of video frames and produces output including a reconstructed frame (1005). Particular embodiments of video decoders typically use a variation or supplemented version of the generalized decoder (1000).


The decoder system (1000) decompresses predicted frames and key frames. For the sake of presentation, FIG. 10 shows a path for key frames through the decoder system (1000) and a path for forward-predicted frames. Many of the components of the decoder system (1000) are used for decompressing both key frames and predicted frames. The exact operations performed by those components can vary depending on the type of information being decompressed.


A buffer (1090) receives the information (1095) for the compressed video sequence and makes the received information available to the entropy decoder (1080). The buffer (1090) typically receives the information at a rate that is fairly constant over time, and includes a jitter buffer to smooth short-term variations in bandwidth or transmission. The buffer (1090) can include a playback buffer and other buffers as well. Alternatively, the buffer (1090) receives information at a varying rate. Before or after the buffer (1090), the compressed video information can be channel decoded and processed for error detection and correction.


The entropy decoder (1080) entropy decodes entropy-coded quantized data as well as entropy-coded side information (e.g., motion information (1015), spatial extrapolation modes, quantization step size), typically applying the inverse of the entropy encoding performed in the encoder. Entropy decoding techniques include arithmetic decoding, differential decoding, Huffman decoding, run length decoding, LZ decoding, dictionary decoding, and combinations of the above. The entropy decoder (1080) frequently uses different decoding techniques for different kinds of information (e.g., DC coefficients, AC coefficients, different kinds of side information), and can choose from among multiple code tables within a particular decoding technique.


If the frame (1005) to be reconstructed is a forward-predicted frame, a motion compensator (1030) applies motion information (1015) to a reference frame (1025) to form a prediction (1035) of the frame (1005) being reconstructed. For example, the motion compensator (1030) uses a macroblock motion vector to find a macroblock in the reference frame (1025). A frame buffer (1020) stores previous reconstructed frames for use as reference frames. The motion compensator (1030) can compensate for motion at pixel, ½ pixel, ¼ pixel, or other increments, and can switch the precision of the motion compensation on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. The precision of the motion compensation can be the same or different horizontally and vertically. Alternatively, a motion compensator applies another type of motion compensation. The prediction by the motion compensator is rarely perfect, so the decoder (1000) also reconstructs prediction residuals.


When the decoder needs a reconstructed frame for subsequent motion compensation, the frame store (1020) buffers the reconstructed frame for use in predicting a next frame. In some embodiments, the encoder applies a deblocking filter to the reconstructed frame to adaptively smooth discontinuities between the blocks of the frame.


An inverse quantizer (1070) inverse quantizes entropy-decoded data. In general, the inverse quantizer applies uniform, scalar inverse quantization to the entropy-decoded data with a step-size that varies on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. Alternatively, the inverse quantizer applies another type of inverse quantization to the data, for example, a non-uniform, vector, or non-adaptive inverse quantization, or directly inverse quantizes spatial domain data in a decoder system that does not use inverse frequency transformations.


An inverse frequency transformer (1060) converts the quantized, frequency domain data into spatial domain video information. For block-based video frames, the inverse frequency transformer (1060) applies an IDCT or variant of IDCT to blocks of the DCT coefficients, producing pixel data or prediction residual data for key frames or predicted frames, respectively. Alternatively, the frequency transformer (1060) applies another conventional inverse frequency transform such as a Fourier transform or uses wavelet or subband synthesis. In embodiments in which the decoder uses spatial extrapolation (not shown in FIG. 10) to decode blocks of key frames, the inverse frequency transformer (1060) can apply a re-oriented inverse frequency transform such as a skewed IDCT to blocks of prediction residuals for the key frame. The inverse frequency transformer (1060) applies an 8×8, 8×4, 4×8, or other size inverse frequency transforms (e.g., IDCT) to prediction residuals for predicted frames.


The decoder (1000) processes DC coefficient information when quantization step sizes are small, for example, as described below.


III. Example Bitstream Syntax and Semantics

An example bitstream includes information for a sequence of compressed progressive video frames or other pictures. The bitstream is organized into several hierarchical layers that are decoded by a decoder such as the decoder (1000) of FIG. 10. The highest layer is the sequence layer, which has information for the overall sequence of frames. Additionally, each compressed video frame is made up of data that is structured into three hierarchical layers. From top to bottom the layers are: picture, macroblock, and block.



FIG. 11A is a syntax diagram for the sequence layer (1100), which includes a sequence header (1110) followed by data for the picture layer (see FIG. 11B). The sequence header (1110) includes several sequence-level elements that are processed by the decoder and used to decode the sequence, including a macroblock quantization (DQUANT) element (111) and quantizer specifier (QUANTIZER) element (1112). DQUANT (1111) is a 2-bit field that indicates whether or not the quantization step size can vary within a frame. There are three possible values for DQUANT. If DQUANT=0, then the only one quantization step size (i.e. the frame quantization step size) can be used per frame. If DQUANT=1 or 2, then it is possible to quantize each of the macroblocks in the frame differently.


The QUANTIZER (1112) is a 2-bit fixed length code [“FLC” ] field that indicates the quantizer used for the sequence. The quantizer types are encoded according to the following Table 2.









TABLE 2







Quantizer Specification








FLC
Quantizer specification





00
Quantizer implicitly specified at frame level


01
Quantizer explicitly specified at frame level


10
5 QP deadzone quantizer used for all frames


11
3 QP deadzone quantizer used for all frames










FIG. 11B is a syntax diagram for the picture layer (1120) for a progressive intra-frame [“progressive I-frame” ]. Syntax diagrams for other pictures, such as P-frames and B-frames have many similar syntax elements. The picture layer (1120) includes a picture header (1130) followed by data for the macroblock layer. The picture header (1130) includes several picture-level elements that are processed by the decoder and used to decode the corresponding frame. Some of those elements are only present if their presence is signaled or implied by a sequence-level element or a preceding picture-level element.


For example, the picture header (1130) includes an intra transform DCT table (DCTDCTAB) element (1137). This field is present in P pictures and baseline I pictures (X8IF=0). DCTDCTAB (1137) is a 1-bit field that signals which of two sets of VLC tables is used to decode the transform DC coefficients in intra-coded blocks. If DCTDCTAB=0, then the low motion VLC tables (one for luminance DC, one for chrominance DC) are used. If DCTDCTAB=1 then the high motion VLC tables (one for luminance DC, one for chrominance DC) are used. The transform DC VLC tables are listed below.


The picture header (1130) includes a picture quantizer index (PQINDEX) element (1131). PQINDEX (1131) is a 5-bit field that signals the quantizer scale index for the entire frame. It is present in all picture types. If the implicit quantizer is used (signaled by sequence field QUANTIZER=00, see Table 2 above) then PQINDEX specifies both the picture quantizer scale (PQUANT) and the quantizer (3QP or 5QP deadzone) used for the frame. Table 3 shows how PQINDEX is translated to PQUANT and the quantizer for implicit mode.









TABLE 3







PQINDEX to PQUANT/Quantizer Deadzone Translation (Implicit


Quantizer)











Quantizer


PQINDEX
PQUANT
Deadzone












0
NA
NA


1
1
3 QP


2
2
3 QP


3
3
3 QP


4
4
3 QP


5
5
3 QP


6
6
3 QP


7
7
3 QP


8
8
3 QP


9
6
5 QP


10
7
5 QP


11
8
5 QP


12
9
5 QP


13
10
5 QP


14
11
5 QP


15
12
5 QP


16
13
5 QP


17
14
5 QP


18
15
5 QP


19
16
5 QP


20
17
5 QP


21
18
5 QP


22
19
5 QP


23
20
5 QP


24
21
5 QP


25
22
5 QP


26
23
5 QP


27
24
5 QP


28
25
5 QP


29
27
5 QP


30
29
5 QP


31
31
5 QP









If the quantizer is signaled explicitly at the sequence or frame level (signaled by sequence field QUANTIZER=01, 10 or 11, see Table 2 above) then PQINDEX is translated to the picture quantizer step size PQUANT as indicated by Table 4.









TABLE 4







PQINDEX to PQUANT Translation (Explicit Quantizer)










PQUANT
PQUANT



3 QP
5 QP


PQINDEX
Deadzone
Deadzone












0
NA
NA


1
1
1


2
2
1


3
3
1


4
4
2


5
5
3


6
6
4


7
7
5


8
8
6


9
9
7


10
10
8


11
11
9


12
12
10


13
13
11


14
14
12


15
15
13


16
16
14


17
17
15


18
18
16


19
19
17


20
20
18


21
21
19


22
22
20


23
23
21


24
24
22


25
25
23


26
26
24


27
27
25


28
28
26


29
29
27


30
30
29


31
31
31









Alternatively, instead of the translation shown in Table 4, PQUANT is equal to PQINDEX for all values of PQINDEX from 1 through 31 when the quantizer is signaled explicitly at the sequence or frame level.


The picture header (1130) also includes a half QP step (HALFQP) element (1134) and picture quantizer type (PQUANTIZER) element (1135). HALFQP (1034) is a 1-bit field present if PQINDEX (1033) is less than or equal to 8. HALFQP (1134) allows the picture quantizer to be expressed in half step increments over the low PQUANT range. If HALFQP=1 then the picture quantizer step size is PQUANT+½. If HALFQP=0 then the picture quantizer step size is PQUANT. Therefore, if the 3QP deadzone quantizer is used then half step sizes are possible up to PQUANT=9 (i.e., PQUANT=1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 . . . 8.5, 9) and then only integer step sizes are allowable above PQUANT=9. For the 5QP deadzone quantizer, half step sizes are possible up to PQUANT=7 (i.e., 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 . . . 6.5, 7).


PQUANTIZER (1135) is a 1-bit field present in all frame types if the sequence level field QUANTIZER=01 (see Table 2 above). In this case, the quantizer used for the frame is specified by PQUANTIZER. If PQUANTIZER=0 then the 5QP deadzone quantizer is used for the frame. If PQUANTIZER=1 then the 3QP deadzone quantizer is used.


The picture header (1130) further includes a macroblock quantization (VODPQUANT) field (1136). VODPQUANT (1136) may be used to adjust quantization step sizes for macroblocks (e.g., macroblocks at one or more edges of a frame, or on a per macroblock basis). For additional detail about VODPQUANT (1136), see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/623,195, filed Jul. 18, 2003.



FIG. 11C is a macroblock-layer (1140) bitstream syntax diagram for progressive I-frames. The bitstream syntax for the macroblock layer of P-pictures and B-pictures contain many elements in common. Data for a macroblock consists of a macroblock header (1150) followed by block-layer data.



FIG. 11D is an intra-coded block-layer (1160) bitstream syntax diagram. The block-layer data includes a transform DC coefficient (DCCOEF) element (1161), an escape transform DC coefficient (DCCOEFESC) element (1162), and a transform DC sign (DCSIGN) element (1163).


The DCCOEF (1161) field is only present in intra-coded blocks. This is a variable-length codeword that encodes a transform DC differential. The transform DC decoding process is described further below. One of two sets of code tables is used to encode the DC differentials (the table is signaled in the DCTDCTAB (1137) field in the picture header as described above). The DC VLC tables are also listed below.


The DCCOEFESC (1162) field is only present in intra-coded blocks and only if DCCOEF decodes to the escape code. The size of DCCOEFESC field can be 8, 9 or 10 bits depending on the quantization step size of the block.


DCSIGN (1163) is a 1-bit value that indicates the sign of the DC differential. If DCSIGN=0 then the DC differential is positive. If DCSIGN=1 then the DC differential is negative.


IV. Example Decoding and Dequantization of DC Coefficients for Intra Blocks

For typical intra-coded blocks, a decoder such as the decoder (1000) of FIG. 10 decodes coefficients, performs inverse quantization, and performs an inverse transform.


A. Decodine DC Differentials


The DC coefficient is coded differentially with respect to an already-decoded DC coefficient neighbor. This section describes the process used to decode the bitstream to obtain the DC differential.



FIG. 11D shows the bitstream elements used to encode/decode the DC differential. DCCOEF is decoded using one of two sets of VLC tables (one for low motion and one for high motion). Each set of VLC tables includes a table for DC differentials for luminance blocks and a table for DC differentials for chrominance blocks. The table is specified by the DCTDCTAB (1137) field in the picture header. Based on the value of DCTDCTAB, one of the VLC tables listed below is used to decode DCCOEF. This will yield either:

    • 1) zero, or
    • 2) the absolute value of the DC differential, or
    • 3) the escape code.


If DCCOEF decodes to zero, the value of the DC differential is also zero. Otherwise, further decoding is done to determine the value of the DC differential. If DCCOEF decodes to the escape code, the absolute value of the DC differential is encoded in the DCCOEFESC field. The size of the DCCOEFESC field is 8, 9 or 10 bits depending on the quantization step size of the block. The sign of the DC differential is obtained from the DCSIGN field. FIG. 12 lists pseudocode to illustrate the DC differential decoding process.


B. DC Differential VLC Tables


1. Low-Motion VLC Tables









TABLE 5







Low-motion Luminance DC Differential VLC Table









DC
VLC
VLC


Differential
Codeword
Size












0
1
1


1
1
2


2
1
4


3
1
5


4
5
5


5
7
5


6
8
6


7
12
6


8
0
7


9
2
7


10
18
7


11
26
7


12
3
8


13
7
8


14
39
8


15
55
8


16
5
9


17
76
9


18
108
9


19
109
9


20
8
10


21
25
10


22
155
10


23
27
10


24
154
10


25
19
11


26
52
11


27
53
11


28
97
12


29
72
13


30
196
13


31
74
13


32
198
13


33
199
13


34
146
14


35
395
14


36
147
14


37
387
14


38
386
14


39
150
14


40
151
14


41
384
14


42
788
15


43
789
15


44
1541
16


45
1540
16


46
1542
16


47
3086
17


48
197581
23


49
197577
23


50
197576
23


51
197578
23


52
197579
23


53
197580
23


54
197582
23


55
197583
23


56
197584
23


57
197585
23


58
197586
23


59
197587
23


60
197588
23


61
197589
23


62
197590
23


63
197591
23


64
197592
23


65
197593
23


66
197594
23


67
197595
23


68
197596
23


69
197597
23


70
197598
23


71
197599
23


72
197600
23


73
197601
23


74
197602
23


75
197603
23


76
197604
23


77
197605
23


78
197606
23


79
197607
23


80
197608
23


81
197609
23


82
197610
23


83
197611
23


84
197612
23


85
197613
23


86
197614
23


87
197615
23


88
197616
23


89
197617
23


90
197618
23


91
197619
23


92
197620
23


93
197621
23


94
197622
23


95
197623
23


96
197624
23


97
197625
23


98
197626
23


99
197627
23


100
197628
23


101
197629
23


102
197630
23


103
197631
23


104
395136
24


105
395137
24


106
395138
24


107
395139
24


108
395140
24


109
395141
24


110
395142
24


111
395143
24


112
395144
24


113
395145
24


114
395146
24


115
395147
24


116
395148
24


117
395149
24


118
395150
24


ESCAPE
395151
24
















TABLE 6







Low-motion Chroma DC Differential VLC Table









DC
VCL
VLC


Differential
Codeword
Size












0
0
2


1
1
2


2
5
3


3
9
4


4
13
4


5
17
5


6
29
5


7
31
5


8
33
6


9
49
6


10
56
6


11
51
6


12
57
6


13
61
6


14
97
7


15
121
7


16
128
8


17
200
8


18
202
8


19
240
8


20
129
8


21
192
8


22
201
8


23
263
9


24
262
9


25
406
9


26
387
9


27
483
9


28
482
9


29
522
10


30
523
10


31
1545
11


32
1042
11


33
1043
11


34
1547
11


35
1041
11


36
1546
11


37
1631
11


38
1040
11


39
1629
11


40
1630
11


41
3256
12


42
3088
12


43
3257
12


44
6179
13


45
12357
14


46
24713
15


47
49424
16


48
3163208
22


49
3163209
22


50
3163210
22


51
3163211
22


52
3163212
22


53
3163213
22


54
3163214
22


55
3163215
22


56
3163216
22


57
3163217
22


58
3163218
22


59
3163219
22


60
3163220
22


61
3163221
22


62
3163222
22


63
3163223
22


64
3163224
22


65
3163225
22


66
3163226
22


67
3163227
22


68
3163228
22


69
3163229
22


70
8163230
22


71
3163231
22


72
3163232
22


73
3163233
22


74
3163234
22


75
3163235
22


76
3163236
22


77
3163237
22


78
3163238
22


79
3163239
22


80
3163240
22


81
3163241
22


82
3163242
22


83
3163243
22


84
3163244
22


85
3163245
22


86
3163246
22


87
3163247
22


88
3163248
22


89
3163249
22


90
3163250
22


91
3163251
22


92
3163252
22


93
3163253
22


94
3163254
22


95
3163255
22


96
3163256
22


97
3163257
22


98
3163258
22


99
3163259
22


100
3163260
22


101
3163261
22


102
3163262
22


103
3163263
22


104
6326400
23


105
6326401
23


106
6326402
23


107
6326403
23


108
6326404
23


109
6326405
23


110
6326406
23


111
6326407
23


112
6326408
23


113
6326409
23


114
6326410
23


115
6326411
23


116
6326412
23


117
6326413
23


118
6326414
23


ESCAPE
6326415
23









2. High-Motion Tables









TABLE 7







High-motion Luminance DC Differential VLC Table









DC
VLC
VLC


Differential
Codeword
Size












0
2
2


1
3
2


2
3
3


3
2
4


4
5
4


5
1
5


6
3
5


7
8
5


8
0
6


9
5
6


10
13
6


11
15
6


12
19
6


13
8
7


14
24
7


15
28
7


16
36
7


17
4
8


18
6
8


19
18
8


20
50
8


21
59
8


22
74
8


23
75
8


24
11
9


25
38
9


26
39
9


27
102
9


28
116
9


29
117
9


30
20
10


31
28
10


32
31
10


33
29
10


34
43
11


35
61
11


36
413
11


37
415
11


38
84
12


39
825
12


40
824
12


41
829
12


42
171
13


43
241
13


44
1656
13


45
242
13


46
480
14


47
481
14


48
340
14


49
3314
14


50
972
15


51
683
15


52
6631
15


53
974
15


54
6630
15


55
1364
16


56
1951
16


57
1365
16


58
3901
17


59
3895
17


60
3900
17


61
3893
17


62
7789
18


63
7784
18


64
15576
19


65
15571
19


66
15577
19


67
31140
20


68
996538
25


69
996532
25


70
996533
25


71
996534
25


72
996535
25


73
996536
25


74
996537
25


75
996539
25


76
996540
25


77
996541
25


78
996542
25


79
996543
25


80
1993024
26


81
1993025
26


82
1993026
26


83
1993027
26


84
1993028
26


85
1993029
26


86
1993030
26


87
1993031
26


88
1993032
26


89
1993033
26


90
1993034
26


91
1993035
26


92
1993036
26


93
1993037
26


94
1993038
26


95
1993039
26


96
1993040
26


97
1993041
26


98
1993042
26


99
1993043
26


100
1993044
26


101
1993045
26


102
1993046
26


103
1993047
26


104
1993048
26


105
1993049
26


106
1993050
26


107
1993051
26


108
1993052
26


109
1993053
26


110
1993054
26


111
1993055
26


112
1993056
26


113
1993057
26


114
1993058
26


115
1993059
26


116
1993060
26


117
1993061
26


118
1993062
26


ESCAPE
1993063
26
















TABLE 8







High-motion Chroma DC Differential VLC Table









DC
VLC
VLC


Differential
Codeword
Size












0
0
2


1
1
2


2
4
3


3
7
3


4
11
4


5
13
4


6
21
5


7
40
6


8
48
6


9
50
6


10
82
7


11
98
7


12
102
7


13
166
8


14
198
8


15
207
8


16
335
9


17
398
9


18
412
9


19
669
10


20
826
10


21
1336
11


22
1596
11


23
1598
11


24
1599
11


25
1654
11


26
2675
12


27
3194
12


28
3311
12


29
5349
13


30
6621
13


31
10696
14


32
10697
14


33
25565
15


34
13240
14


35
13241
14


36
51126
16


37
25560
15


38
25567
15


39
51123
16


40
51124
16


41
51125
16


42
25566
15


43
51127
16


44
51128
16


45
51129
16


46
102245
17


47
204488
18


48
13087304
24


49
13087305
24


50
13087306
24


51
13087307
24


52
13087308
24


53
13087309
24


54
13087310
24


55
13087311
24


56
13087312
24


57
13087313
24


58
13087314
24


59
13087315
24


60
13087316
24


61
13087317
24


62
13087318
24


63
13087319
24


64
13087320
24


65
13087321
24


66
13087322
24


67
13087323
24


68
13087324
24


69
13087325
24


70
13087326
24


71
13087327
24


72
13087328
24


73
13087329
24


74
13087330
24


75
13087331
24


76
13087332
24


77
13087333
24


78
13087334
24


79
13087335
24


80
13087336
24


81
13087337
24


82
13087338
24


83
13087339
24


84
13087340
24


85
13087341
24


86
13087342
24


87
13087343
24


88
13087344
24


89
13087345
24


90
13087346
24


91
13087347
24


92
13087348
24


93
13087349
24


94
13087350
24


95
13087351
24


96
13087352
24


97
13087353
24


98
13087354
24


99
13087355
24


100
13087356
24


101
13087357
24


102
13087358
24


103
13087359
24


104
26174592
25


105
26174593
25


106
26174594
25


107
26174595
25


108
26174596
25


109
26174597
25


110
26174598
25


111
26174599
25


112
26174600
25


113
26174601
25


114
26174602
25


115
26174603
25


116
26174604
25


117
26174605
25


118
26174606
25


ESCAPE
26174607
25









C. Computing DC Predictors


The quantized DC value for a current block is obtained by adding a DC predictor to the DC differential. The DC predictor is obtained from one of the previously decoded adjacent blocks, which may be labeled candidate predictors A (from the block immediately above and to the left of the current block), B (from the block immediately above the current block), and C (from the block immediately to the left of the current block). The values for A, B and C are the quantized DC values for the respective adjacent blocks.


In some cases there are missing adjacent blocks. If the current block is in the first block row of the frame, there are no A or B (and possibly no C). If the current block is in the first block column in the frame, there are no A and C (and possibly no B) blocks. For these cases the DC predictor is set to:

DCPredictor=(1024+(DCStepSize>>1))/DCStepSize,

where DCStepSize is a value described below.


Otherwise, a prediction direction is formed based on the values of A, B and C, and either the B or C predictor is chosen. The prediction direction is calculated as follows. If the absolute value of (A−B) is less than or equal to the absolute value of (A−C), then the prediction is made from the left (C is the predictor). Otherwise, the prediction is made from the top (B is the predictor).


The quantized DC coefficient is then calculated by adding the DC differential and the DC predictor as follows:

DCCoeffQ=DCPredictor+DCDifferential


D. Inverse-Quantization for Baseline I-Frame Pictures


In each macroblock of a picture frame, the decoder decodes a DC coefficient and set of AC coefficients, which were each quantized at the encoder. These quantized transform coefficients are dequantized for a baseline I-Frame picture as described below.


1. DC Inverse-Quantization


The quantized DC coefficient (DCCoeffQ) is reconstructed by performing the following de-quantization operation:

DCCoefficient=DCCoeffQ*DCStepSize


The value of DCStepSize is based on the value of PQUANT as follows:


For PQUANT equal to 1 or 2:

DCStepSize=2*PQUANT


For PQUANT equal to 3 or 4:

DCStepSize=8


For PQUANT greater than or equal to 5:

DCStepSize=PQUANT/2+6


2. Inverse AC Coefficient Quantization


AC coefficients are separately decoded. Depending on whether the 3-QP or 5-QP deadzone quantizer is used, the non-zero quantized AC coefficients are inverse quantized according to the following formula:

dequant_coeff=quant_coeff*double_quant (if 3−QP deadzone quantizer), or
dequant_coeff=quant_coeff*double_quant+sign(quant_coeff)*quant_scale (if 5-QP deadzone quantizer)


where:

    • quant_coef is the quantized coefficient
    • dequant_coeff is the inverse quantized coefficient

      double_quant=2*PQUANT+HalfStep
    • quant_scale=PQUANT


PQUANT is encoded in the picture layer as described above. HalfStep is encoded in the picture layer as via the HALFQP element as described above.


V. Signaling for DC Coefficients with Small Quantization Step Sizes, Theory

In the implementation described in detail above, the range for differential DC coefficients becomes larger as the quantization step size becomes smaller. For example, the range for a quantization step size of 2 is twice as large as the range for a quantization step size of 4. Further, the range for quantization step size of 1 is four times the range for quantization step size of 4. A VLC table used to directly encode/decode the differential DC coefficient for such small step sizes would need to be very large and would impose excessive memory requirements in some cases (e.g., in small footprint devices). Further, as the lowest quantization step sizes are infrequently or rarely used in practical encoding scenarios, the cost of this additional memory requirement would not be justified.


The problem of excessively large VLC tables for very small quantization sizes is addressed in this implementation by designing the VLC tables to accommodate the range of differential DC coefficients when the quantization step size is 4. Then, for smaller quantization step sizes (e.g., 1 and 2), a multistage approach is used to signal the differential DC coefficient. More specifically, at a quantization step size of 2, a standard VLC table is used to decode a base VLC for the differential DC coefficient. An additional 1-bit code is also decoded, and this is used to refine the value of the differential DC coefficient. At a quantization step size of 1, a standard VLC table again is used to decode a base VLC for the differential DC coefficient. An additional 2-bit code is also decoded and used to refine the value of the differential DC coefficient.


When the base VLC represents the escape code, a further FLC is used to signal the differential DC coefficient. The size of the FLC changes with the quantization step size. For example, the FLC is 8 bits for quantization steps sizes over 2, and 9 and 10 bits for quantization step sizes of 2 and 1, respectively. This reduces bit rate for the escape code FLCs for higher quantization step sizes.


Having described and illustrated the principles of our invention, it will be recognized that the various embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. It should be understood that the programs, processes, or methods described herein are not related or limited to any particular type of computing environment, unless indicated otherwise. Various types of general purpose or specialized computing environments may be used with or perform operations in accordance with the teachings described herein. Elements of embodiments shown in software may be implemented in hardware and vice versa.


In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of our invention may be applied, we claim as our invention all such embodiments as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving encoded data in a bitstream; anddecoding the encoded data to reconstruct a picture, including, for a block of the picture: determining a quantization step size that applies for the block based on one or more syntax elements in the bitstream;decoding a variable length code (VLC) for a DC differential for a DC coefficient of the block, the DC differential representing a difference between the DC coefficient and a DC predictor for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the decoding the VLC uses a VLC table that includes an escape code as well as different VLC values that are associated with different values for DC differentials, and wherein the VLC is not the escape code, such that the decoding the VLC yields a value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block;checking whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of a set of small quantization step sizes; andreconstructing the DC differential, including using the value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block as a base absolute value or as a final absolute value depending on whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes if the quantization step size that applies for the block is 1 or 2.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the decoding the encoded data further includes: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes; anddecoding a fixed length code (FLC) that indicates a refinement value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the base absolute value, the refinement value, and a sign value.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the FLC has a length that varies depending on the quantization step size that applies for the block.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein: if the quantization step size that applies for the block is 1, the length of the FLC is 2; andif the quantization step size that applies for the block is 2, the length of the FLC is 1.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the decoding the encoded data further includes: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is not one of the set of small quantization step sizes, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the final absolute value and a sign value.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the decoding the encoded data further includes: computing the DC predictor; andcombining the DC differential and the DC predictor.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the VLC table further includes: a VLC associated with a zero value.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more blocks are intra-coded blocks.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the quantization step size that applies for the block is indicated at least in part by a picture-layer syntax element for the picture and at least in part by a differential quantization syntax element that adjusts the quantization step size for a macroblock that includes the block.
  • 11. One or more computer-readable memory devices storing computer-executable instructions for causing one or more processing units, when programmed thereby, to perform operations comprising: receiving encoded data in a bitstream; anddecoding the encoded data to reconstruct a picture, including, for a block of the picture: determining a quantization step size that applies for the block based on one or more syntax elements in the bitstream;decoding a variable length code (VLC) for a DC differential for a DC coefficient of the block, the DC differential representing a difference between the DC coefficient and a DC predictor for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the decoding the VLC uses a VLC table that includes an escape code as well as different VLC values that are associated with different values for DC differentials, and wherein the VLC is not the escape code, such that the decoding the VLC yields a value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block;checking whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of a set of small quantization step sizes; andreconstructing the DC differential, including using the value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block as a base absolute value or as a final absolute value depending on whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes.
  • 12. The one or more computer-readable memory devices of claim 11, wherein the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes if the quantization step size that applies for the block is 1 or 2.
  • 13. The one or more computer-readable memory devices of claim 12, wherein the decoding the encoded data further includes: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes; anddecoding a fixed length code (FLC) that indicates a refinement value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the base absolute value, the refinement value, and a sign value.
  • 14. The one or more computer-readable memory devices of claim 13, wherein the FLC has a length that varies depending on the quantization step size that applies for the block.
  • 15. The one or more computer-readable memory devices of claim 11, wherein the decoding the encoded data further includes: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is not one of the set of small quantization step sizes, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the final absolute value and a sign value.
  • 16. The one or more computer-readable memory devices of claim 11, wherein the VLC table further includes a VLC associated with a zero value.
  • 17. A computer system comprising: a buffer configured to receive encoded data in a bitstream; anda decoder configured to decode the encoded data to reconstruct a picture by performing operations that include, for a block of the picture: determining a quantization step size that applies for the block based on one or more syntax elements in the bitstream;decoding a variable length code (VLC) for a DC differential for a DC coefficient of the block, the DC differential representing a difference between the DC coefficient and a DC predictor for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the decoding the VLC uses a VLC table that includes an escape code as well as different VLC values that are associated with different values for DC differentials, and wherein the VLC is not the escape code, such that the decoding the VLC yields a value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block;checking whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of a set of small quantization step sizes; andreconstructing the DC differential, including using the value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block as a base absolute value or as a final absolute value depending on whether the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes.
  • 18. The computer system of claim 17, wherein the operations further include: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is one of the set of small quantization step sizes; anddecoding a fixed length code (FLC) that indicates a refinement value for the DC differential for the DC coefficient of the block, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the base absolute value, the refinement value, and a sign value.
  • 19. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the FLC has a length that varies depending on the quantization step size that applies for the block.
  • 20. The computer system of claim 17, wherein the operations further include: determining that the quantization step size that applies for the block is not one of the set of small quantization step sizes, wherein the reconstructing the DC differential uses the final absolute value and a sign value.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/068,325, filed Mar. 11, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/815,029, filed Jun. 14, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,313,509, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168, filed Jul. 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,554, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/488,710, filed Jul. 18, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168 also is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/623,195, filed Jul. 18, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,602,851, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (302)
Number Name Date Kind
4454546 Mori Jun 1984 A
4583114 Catros Apr 1986 A
4661849 Hinman Apr 1987 A
4661853 Roeder et al. Apr 1987 A
4679079 Catros et al. Jul 1987 A
4691329 Juri et al. Sep 1987 A
4695882 Wada et al. Sep 1987 A
4774574 Daly et al. Sep 1988 A
4796087 Guichard et al. Jan 1989 A
4800432 Barnett et al. Jan 1989 A
4849812 Borgers et al. Jul 1989 A
4862264 Wells et al. Aug 1989 A
4862267 Gillard et al. Aug 1989 A
4864393 Harradine et al. Sep 1989 A
4965830 Barham et al. Oct 1990 A
4992889 Yamagami et al. Feb 1991 A
5021879 Vogel Jun 1991 A
5068724 Krause et al. Nov 1991 A
5072295 Murakami et al. Dec 1991 A
5091782 Krause et al. Feb 1992 A
5103306 Weiman et al. Apr 1992 A
5128758 Azadegan et al. Jul 1992 A
5136377 Johnston et al. Aug 1992 A
5157490 Kawai et al. Oct 1992 A
5175618 Ueda Dec 1992 A
5179442 Azadegan et al. Jan 1993 A
5223949 Honjo Jun 1993 A
5237410 Inoue Aug 1993 A
5241395 Chen Aug 1993 A
5253058 Gharavi Oct 1993 A
5258836 Murata Nov 1993 A
5298991 Yagasaki et al. Mar 1994 A
5301242 Gonzales et al. Apr 1994 A
5303058 Fukuda et al. Apr 1994 A
5317396 Fujinami May 1994 A
5317672 Crossman et al. May 1994 A
5374958 Yanagihara Dec 1994 A
5412430 Nagata May 1995 A
RE34965 Sugiyama Jun 1995 E
5422676 Herpel et al. Jun 1995 A
5424779 Odaka Jun 1995 A
5428396 Yagasaki Jun 1995 A
5442400 Sun Aug 1995 A
5448297 Alattar et al. Sep 1995 A
5452104 Lee Sep 1995 A
5461421 Moon Oct 1995 A
RE35093 Wang et al. Nov 1995 E
5467086 Jeong Nov 1995 A
5467136 Odaka Nov 1995 A
5477272 Zhang Dec 1995 A
5481553 Suzuki et al. Jan 1996 A
RE35158 Sugiyama Feb 1996 E
5510840 Yonemitsu et al. Apr 1996 A
5539466 Igarashi et al. Jul 1996 A
5544286 Laney Aug 1996 A
5552832 Astle Sep 1996 A
5559557 Kato Sep 1996 A
5565920 Lee et al. Oct 1996 A
5565922 Krause Oct 1996 A
5587708 Chiu Dec 1996 A
5594504 Ebrahimi Jan 1997 A
5606371 Gunnewick et al. Feb 1997 A
5623311 Phillips et al. Apr 1997 A
5623424 Azadegan et al. Apr 1997 A
5631644 Katata et al. May 1997 A
5654760 Ohtsuki Aug 1997 A
5657087 Jeong et al. Aug 1997 A
5659365 Wilkinson Aug 1997 A
5663763 Yagasaki et al. Sep 1997 A
5666461 Igarashi et al. Sep 1997 A
5668932 Laney Sep 1997 A
5673370 Laney Sep 1997 A
5692063 Lee et al. Nov 1997 A
5699476 Van Der Meer Dec 1997 A
5701164 Kato Dec 1997 A
5731836 Lee Mar 1998 A
5731837 Hurst, Jr. Mar 1998 A
5739861 Music Apr 1998 A
5748789 Lee et al. May 1998 A
5751358 Suzuki et al. May 1998 A
5751379 Markandey et al. May 1998 A
5761088 Hulyalkar et al. Jun 1998 A
5764803 Jacquin et al. Jun 1998 A
5764814 Chen et al. Jun 1998 A
5784175 Lee Jul 1998 A
5786856 Hall et al. Jul 1998 A
5787203 Lee et al. Jul 1998 A
5796855 Lee Aug 1998 A
5799113 Lee Aug 1998 A
RE35910 Nagata et al. Sep 1998 E
5802213 Gardos Sep 1998 A
5809178 Anderson et al. Sep 1998 A
5819035 Devaney et al. Oct 1998 A
5825310 Tsutsui Oct 1998 A
5825929 Chen et al. Oct 1998 A
5835145 Ouyang et al. Nov 1998 A
5835237 Ebrahimi Nov 1998 A
5844613 Chaddha Dec 1998 A
5847776 Khmelnitsky Dec 1998 A
5867167 Deering Feb 1999 A
5870435 Choi et al. Feb 1999 A
5874995 Naimpally et al. Feb 1999 A
5883672 Suzuki et al. Mar 1999 A
5901248 Fandrianto et al. May 1999 A
5929940 Jeannin Jul 1999 A
5946042 Kato Aug 1999 A
5946043 Lee et al. Aug 1999 A
5946419 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5949489 Nishikawa et al. Sep 1999 A
5959673 Lee Sep 1999 A
5959674 Jang et al. Sep 1999 A
5963258 Nishikawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5963673 Kodama et al. Oct 1999 A
5969764 Sun et al. Oct 1999 A
5970173 Lee et al. Oct 1999 A
5970175 Nishikawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5973743 Han Oct 1999 A
5973755 Gabriel Oct 1999 A
5974184 Eifrig et al. Oct 1999 A
5982437 Okazaki et al. Nov 1999 A
5982438 Lin et al. Nov 1999 A
5990957 Ryoo Nov 1999 A
5990960 Murakami et al. Nov 1999 A
5991447 Eifrig et al. Nov 1999 A
6002439 Murakami et al. Dec 1999 A
6005980 Eifrig et al. Dec 1999 A
RE36507 Iu Jan 2000 E
6011596 Burl Feb 2000 A
6026088 Rostoker et al. Feb 2000 A
6026195 Eifrig et al. Feb 2000 A
6040863 Kato Mar 2000 A
6058362 Malvar May 2000 A
6067322 Wang May 2000 A
6072831 Chen Jun 2000 A
6084636 Fujiwara Jul 2000 A
6088392 Rosenberg Jul 2000 A
6094225 Han Jul 2000 A
RE36822 Sugiyama Aug 2000 E
6097759 Murakami et al. Aug 2000 A
6104751 Artieri Aug 2000 A
6118817 Wang Sep 2000 A
6125140 Wilkinson Sep 2000 A
6130963 Uz et al. Oct 2000 A
6148107 Ducloux et al. Nov 2000 A
6148109 Boon Nov 2000 A
6154495 Yamaguchi et al. Nov 2000 A
6160846 Chiang et al. Dec 2000 A
6167091 Okada et al. Dec 2000 A
6182034 Malvar Jan 2001 B1
6188725 Sugiyama Feb 2001 B1
6188794 Nishikawa et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201927 Comer Mar 2001 B1
6205176 Sugiyama Mar 2001 B1
6208761 Passagio et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212232 Reed et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219070 Baker et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219464 Greggain et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223162 Chen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233017 Chaddha May 2001 B1
6240380 Malvar May 2001 B1
RE37222 Yonemitsu Jun 2001 E
6243418 Kim Jun 2001 B1
6243497 Chiang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249614 Bocharova et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256422 Mitchell et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256423 Krishnamurthy Jul 2001 B1
6259810 Gill et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263024 Matsumoto Jul 2001 B1
6271885 Sugiyama Aug 2001 B2
6275531 Li Aug 2001 B1
6275614 Krishnamurthy et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278735 Mohsenian Aug 2001 B1
6281942 Wang Aug 2001 B1
6282243 Kazui et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292585 Yamaguchi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292588 Shen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295376 Nakaya Sep 2001 B1
6304928 Mairs et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307887 Gabriel Oct 2001 B1
6307973 Nishikawa et al. Oct 2001 B2
6320593 Sachs et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324216 Igarashi Nov 2001 B1
6337881 Chaddha Jan 2002 B1
6347116 Haskell et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356709 Abe et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370502 Wu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377628 Schultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381279 Taubman Apr 2002 B1
6393155 Bright et al. May 2002 B1
6404813 Haskell et al. Jun 2002 B1
6418166 Wu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430316 Wilkinson Aug 2002 B1
6438167 Shimizu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441842 Fandrianto et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456744 Lafe Sep 2002 B1
6463100 Cho et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466620 Lee Oct 2002 B1
6473534 Merhav et al. Oct 2002 B1
6490319 Yang Dec 2002 B1
6493385 Sekiguchi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496601 Migdal et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519284 Pesquet-Popescu et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529632 Nakaya et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539056 Sato et al. Mar 2003 B1
6546049 Lee Apr 2003 B1
6563953 Lin et al. May 2003 B2
6571019 Kim et al. May 2003 B1
6573905 MacInnis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6593925 Hakura et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606418 Mitchell et al. Aug 2003 B2
6646578 Au Nov 2003 B1
6647061 Panusopone et al. Nov 2003 B1
6647152 Willis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650781 Nakaya Nov 2003 B2
6654417 Hui Nov 2003 B1
6678422 Sharma et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687294 Yan et al. Feb 2004 B2
6704718 Burges et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721359 Bist et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728317 Demos Apr 2004 B1
6738423 Lainema et al. May 2004 B1
6759999 Doyen Jul 2004 B1
6765962 Lee et al. Jul 2004 B1
6771830 Goldstein et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785331 Jozawa et al. Aug 2004 B1
6792157 Koshi et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795584 Karczewicz et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801572 Yamada et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810083 Chen et al. Oct 2004 B2
6831947 Ribas Corbera Dec 2004 B2
6873654 Rackett Mar 2005 B1
6876703 Ismaeil et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882753 Chen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6947045 Ostermann et al. Sep 2005 B1
6970479 Abrahamsson et al. Nov 2005 B2
6990242 Malvar Jan 2006 B2
7020204 Auvray et al. Mar 2006 B2
7027507 Wu Apr 2006 B2
7035473 Zeng et al. Apr 2006 B1
7042941 Laksono et al. May 2006 B1
7058127 Lu et al. Jun 2006 B2
7099389 Yu et al. Aug 2006 B1
7110455 Wu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7426308 Hsu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7580584 Lin et al. Aug 2009 B2
7602851 Lee et al. Oct 2009 B2
7738554 Lin et al. Jun 2010 B2
8218624 Holcomb et al. Jul 2012 B2
20010048718 Bruls et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020044602 Ohki Apr 2002 A1
20020136308 Le Maguet et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020154693 Demos et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168066 Li Nov 2002 A1
20020186890 Lee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030009722 Sugiyama et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021482 Lan et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030099292 Wang et al. May 2003 A1
20030112864 Karczewicz et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030113026 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128754 Akimoto et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142748 Tourapis Jul 2003 A1
20030152146 Lin et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156646 Hsu et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030185305 MacInnis et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194010 Srinivasan et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215011 Wang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040022316 Ueda et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042549 Huang et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040090397 Doyen et al. May 2004 A1
20040136457 Funnell et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040141654 Yi-Yung Jul 2004 A1
20040264568 Florencio Dec 2004 A1
20040264580 Chiang Wei Yin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050013365 Mukerjee et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013497 Hsu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013498 Srinivasan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013500 Lee et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015246 Thumpudi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015259 Thumpudi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050036698 Beom Feb 2005 A1
20050036699 Holcomb et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036759 Lin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050041738 Lin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050052294 Liang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050053156 Lin et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050094731 Xu et al. May 2005 A1
20050100093 Holcomb May 2005 A1
20050123274 Crinon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135484 Lee et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147163 Li et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152451 Byun Jul 2005 A1
20050180502 Puri Aug 2005 A1
20050207492 Pao Sep 2005 A1
20050232501 Mukerjee Oct 2005 A1
20050238096 Holcomb et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050254719 Sullivan Nov 2005 A1
20060013307 Olivier et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013309 Ha et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060140267 He et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070009039 Ryu Jan 2007 A1
20070009042 Craig et al. Jan 2007 A1
20100080297 Wang et al. Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
1327074 Feb 1994 CA
0 279 053 Aug 1988 EP
0397402 Nov 1990 EP
0526163 Feb 1993 EP
0535746 Apr 1993 EP
0 830 029 Mar 1998 EP
0863675 Sep 1998 EP
0884912 Dec 1998 EP
0932306 Jul 1999 EP
897363 May 1962 GB
2343579 May 2000 GB
61205086 Sep 1986 JP
62 213 494 Sep 1987 JP
3001688 Jan 1991 JP
3 129 986 Mar 1991 JP
6 078 298 Mar 1994 JP
6078295 Mar 1994 JP
7274171 Oct 1995 JP
10 056 644 Feb 1998 JP
2003061090 Feb 2003 JP
6292188 Oct 2004 JP
132895 Oct 1998 KR
1020020005365 Jan 2002 KR
WO 9721302 Jun 1997 WO
WO 0021207 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0033581 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0207438 Jan 2002 WO
WO 03026296 Mar 2003 WO
WO 04100554 Nov 2004 WO
WO 04100556 Nov 2004 WO
WO 05065030 Jul 2005 WO
WO 06075895 Jul 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (142)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/341,674, filed Dec. 17, 2011, Lee et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/488,710, filed Jul. 18, 2003, Srinivasan et al.
Ahmed et al., “Discrete Cosine Transform,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-23, No. 1, pp. 90-93 (Dec. 1984).
Atzori et al., “Adaptive Anisotropic Filtering (AAF) for Real-Time Visual Enhancement of MPEG-Coded Video Sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 285-298 (May 2002).
AVC-0323, Test Model Editing Committee, “Test Model 2, Draft Revision 1,” MPEG92/N0245, 171 pp. (1992).
Bartkowiak et al., “Color Video Compression Based on Chrominance Vector Quantization,” 7th Int'l Workshop on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, IWSSIP 2000, Maribor 7-9 VI, pp. 107-110 (2000).
Benzler et al., “Improving multiresolution motion compensating hybrid coding by drift reduction,” Picture Coding Symposium, 4 pp. (1996).
Benzler et al., “Motion and aliasing compensating prediction with quarter-pel accuracy and adaptive overlapping blocks as proposal for MPEG-4 tool evaluation—Technical description,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG 95/0552, 5 pp., document marked 1995.
Benzler, “Results of core experiment P8 (Motion an Aliasing compensating Prediction),” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG97/2625, 8 pp., document marked 1997.
Bist et al., “Adaptive Quantization for Low Bit Rate Video Coding,” Proc. 1998 Int'l Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP 98), pp. 925-928 (1998).
Borman et al., “Block-matching Sub-pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—an Empirical Performance Evaluation,” SPIE Visual Comm. & Image Processing, 10 pp. (1999).
Chisu, “Techniques for Accelerating Intensity-Based Rigid Image Registration,” Thesis dated Jan. 15, 2005.
Clarke, “Image and Video Compression: A Survey,” Wiley InterScience Journal Abstract, 2 pp., http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jan. 25, 2006].
Conklin et al., “Multi-resolution Motion Estimation,” Proc. ICASSP '97, Munich, Germany, 4 pp. (1997).
Davis et al., “Equivalence of subpixel motion estimators based on optical flow and block matching,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Symposium on Computer Vision, pp. 7-12 (1995).
De Haan et al., “Sub-pixel motion estimation with 3-D recursive search block-matching,” Signal Processing: Image Comm. 6, pp. 229-239 (1994).
“DivX Multi Standard Video Encoder,” 2 pp. (Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jan. 24, 2006).
Ebrahimi, “MPEG-4 Video Verification Model Version 10.0,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/N1992, pp. 1, 43-52, 72-74, 123-130, and 190, document marked 1998.
Ericsson, “Fixed and Adaptive Predictors for Hybrid Predictive/Transform Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Comm., vol. COM-33, No. 12, pp. 1291-1302 (1985).
Farvardin et al., “Optimum quantizer performance for a class of non-Gaussian memoryless sources,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-30, No. 3, pp. 485-497 (May 1984).
“A Fast Precise Implementation of 8×8 Discrete Cosine Transform Using the Streaming SIMD Extensions and MMX™ Instructions,” Version 1.0, 25 pp. (Apr. 1999).
Flierl et al., “A Video Codec Incorporating Block-Based Multi-Hypothesis Motion-Compensated Prediction,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Visual Communications and image Processing, Perth, Australia, vol. 4067, pp. 238-249 (Jun. 2000).
Flierl et al., “Generalized B Pictures and the Draft H.264/AVC Video Compression Standard,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 587-597 (Jul. 2003).
Flierl et al., “Multihypothesis Motion Estimation for Video Coding,” Proc. DCC, 10 pp. (Mar. 2001).
Foos et al., “JPEG 2000 compression of medical imagery,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3980, pp. 85-96 (2000).
Garrigues et al., “Atom position coding in a matching pursuit based video coder,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4 pp. (2005).
Girod, “Efficiency Analysis of Multihypothesis Motion-Compensated Prediction for Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 173-183 (Feb. 2000).
Girod, “Motion-Compensating Prediction with Fractional-Pel Accuracy,” IEEE Transactions on Comm., vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 604-612 (1993).
Girod, “Motion Compensation: Visual Aspects, Accuracy, and Fundamental Limits,” Motion Analysis and Image Sequence Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125-152 (1993).
Gish et al., “Asymptotically efficient quantizing,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-14, No. 5 (Sep. 1968).
Golston et al., “Video codecs tutorial: Trade-offs with H.264, VC-1 and other advanced codecs,” Video/Imaging Design Line, 9 pp. (Mar. 2006).
“H.264 & IPTV Over DSL—Enabling New Telco Revenue Opportunities,” White Paper, Intel/Envivio, May 15, 2004, available at http://www.envivio.com/images/products/H264whitepaper.pdf.
Horn et al., “Estimation of Motion Vector Fields for Multiscale Motion Compensation,” Proc. Picture Coding Symp. (PCS 97), pp. 141-144 (Sep. 1997).
Hsu et al., “A Low Bit-Rate Video Codec Based on Two-Dimensional Mesh Motion Compensation with Adaptive Interpolation,” IEEE, Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. II, No. 1, pp. 111-117 (Jan. 2001).
Huang et al., “A Frame-Based MPEG Characteristics Extraction Tool and Its Application in Video Transcoding,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 48, No. 3, Aug. 2002, pp. 522-532.
“ISO/IEC 11172-2 Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1.5 Mbit/s,” MPEG (Moving Pictures Expert Group), International Organization for Standardization, MPEG1 Video, 122 pp. (1993).
“ISO/IEC 13818-2. Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information,” MPEG (Moving Pictures Expert Group), International Organization for Standardization, MPEG2 Video (1994).
ISO/IEC, “Information Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects: Visual, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Committee Draft,” 330 pp. (1998).
ISO/IEC, “Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information,” JTCI/SC29/WG11, MPEG-4 Video Verification Model (Feb. 1998).
“ITU-T Recommendation T.6: Facsimile Coding Schemes and Coding Control Functions for Group 4 Facsimile Apparatus,” Facicle VII.3 of the Blue Book, (1988).
ITU—Q15-F-24, “MVC Video Codec—Proposal for H.26L,” Study Group 16, Video Coding Experts Group (Question 15), 28 pp. (document marked as generated in 1998).
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.261: Video Codec for Audiovisual Services at p×64 kbits,” 28 pp. (1993).
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.262: Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information: Video,” 218 pp. (1995).
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.263: Video Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication,” 167 pp. (1998).
Iwahashi et al., “A Motion Compensation Technique for Downscaled Pictures in Layered Coding,” IEICE Transactions on Comm., vol. E77-B, No. 8, pp. 1007-1012 (Aug. 1994).
Joint Video Team of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG, “Committee Draft of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Recommendation H.264, ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC,” 142 pp. (Aug. 2002).
Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, “Draft ITU-T Recommendation and Final Draft International Standard of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264 ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC,” 253 pp. (May 2003).
Joshi et al., “Comparison of generalized Gaussian and Laplacian modeling in DCT image coding,” IEEE Signal Proc. Letters, vol. SPL-2, No. 5, pp. 81-82 (May 1995).
Keys, “Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-29, No. 6, pp. 1153-1160 (1981).
Kim et al., “Still image coding based on vector quantization and fractal approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 587-597 (1996).
Konrad et al., “On Motion Modeling and Estimation for Very Low Bit Rate Video Coding,” Visual Comm. & Image Processing (VCIP '95), 12 pp. (May 1995).
Lam et al., “A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images,” IEEE Trans. Image Proc., vol. IP-9, No. 10, pp. 1661-1666 (Oct. 2000).
LeGall, “MPEG: A Video Compression Standard for Multimedia Application,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 47-58 (Apr. 1991).
LeGall, “The MPEG Video Compression Algorithm,” Signal Processing: Image Communication 4, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 129-140 (Apr. 1992).
LeGall et al., “Transmission of HDTV signals under 140 Mbit/s using a subband decomposition and Discrete Cosine Transform coding,” in Signal Processing of HDTV, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287-293 (1988).
Limb, “A Picture-Coding Algorithm for the Merli Scan,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 300-305 (Apr. 1973).
Lloyd, “Least squares quantization in PCM,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-28, No. 2, pp. 7-12 (Mar. 1982) (reprint of work originally presented in Jul. 1957).
Loomis, “Using the Advanced Settings of the Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile Codec,” 13 pp. (Document dated Apr. 2006) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on May 31, 2007].
Lopes et al., “Analysis of Spatial Transform Motion Estimation with Overlapped Compensation and Fractional-pixel Accuracy,” IEEE Proc. Visual Image Signal Processing, vol. 146, No. 6, pp. 339-344 (Dec. 1999).
Lopresto et al., “Image Coding Based on Mixture Modeling of Wavelet Coefficients and a Fast Estimation-Quantization Framework,” Proc. IEEE Data Compression Conference, (Snowbird, UT), pp. 221-230 (Mar. 1997).
Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. and Machine Intell., vol. PAMI-11, No. 7, pp. 674-692 (Jul. 1989).
Marshall, “The Discrete Cosine Transform,” 4 pp. (document dated Oct. 4, 2001) [downloaded from the World Wide Web on Mar. 30, 2006].
Martinez-Fonte et al., “An Empirical Study on Corner Detection to Extract Buildings in Very High Resolution Satellite Images,” IEEE-ProRisc, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 288-293 (Nov. 2004).
Masala et al., “Perceptually Optimized MPEG Compression of Synthetic Video Sequences,” Proc. ICIP, pp. I-601-I-604 (2005).
Max, “Quantizing for minimum distortion,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-6, No. 1, pp. 7-12 (Mar. 1960).
Microsoft Corporation, “Microsoft Debuts New Windows Media Player 9 Series, Redefining Digital Media on the PC,” 4 pp. (Sep. 4, 2002) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on May 14, 2004].
Mitra et al., “Two-Stage Color Palettization for Error Diffusion,” Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 207-217 (Jun. 2002).
Mook, “Next-Gen Windows Media Player Leaks to the Web,” BetaNews, 17 pp. (Jul. 19, 2002) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Aug. 8, 2003].
Morimoto et al., “Fast Electronic Digital Image Stabilization,” Proc. ICPR, Vienna, Austria, 5 pp. (1996).
Muller, “Distribution shape of two-dimensional DCT coefficients of natural images,” IEE Electronics Letters, vol. 29, No. 22 (Oct. 1993).
Murakami et al., “Comparison between DPCM and Hadamard transform coding in the composite coding of the NTSC color TV signal,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. COM-30, No. 3, pp. 469-479 (Mar. 1982).
Musmann et al., “Advances in Picture Coding,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 523-548 (Apr. 1985).
Neff et al., “Modulus Quantization for Matching Pursuit Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 895-912 (Sep. 2000).
Nguyen et al., “Set Theoretic Compression with an Application to Image Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 1051-1056 (Jul. 1998).
Nougaret et al., “Quick Tuning of a Reference Locomotion Gait,” IEEE Proc. Computer Animation '95, 8 pp. (1995).
“Overview of MPEG-2 Test Model 5,” 5 pp. [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Mar. 1, 2006].
Park et al., “A post processing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technology, vol. 9, pp. 161-171 (Feb. 1999).
Printouts of FTP directories from http://ftp3.itu.ch , 8 pp. (downloaded from the World Wide Web on Sep. 20, 2005.).
Puri et al., “Motion-Compensated Video Coding with Adaptive Perceptual Quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 351-361 (Dec. 1991).
Reader, “History of MPEG Video Compression—Ver. 4.0,” 99 pp., (document marked Dec. 16, 2003).
Reininger et al., “Distribution of two-dimensional DCT coefficients for images,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. COM-31, No. 6, pp. 835-839 (Jun. 1983).
Ribas-Corbera et al., “On the Optimal Block Size for Block-based Motion-Compensated Video Coders,” SPIE Proc. of Visual Comm. & Image Processing, vol. 3024, 12 pp. (1997).
Ribas-Corbera et al., “On the Optimal Motion Vector Accuracy for Block-based Motion-Compensated Video Coders,” Proc. SPIE Digital Video Compression, San Jose, CA, 13 pp. (1996).
Ribas Corbera et al., “Rate Control in DCT Video Coding for Low-Delay Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 172-185 (Feb. 1999).
Schultz et al., “Subpixel Motion Estimation for Super-Resolution Image Sequence Enhancement,” Journal of Visual Comm. & Image Representation, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 38-50 (Mar. 1998).
Schuster et al., “A Theory for the Optimal Bit Allocation Between Displacement Vector Field and Displaced Frame Difference,” IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1739-1751 (Dec. 1997).
Shanableh et al., “Heterogeneous Video Transcoding to Lower Spatio-Temporal Resolutions and Different Encoding Formats,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 101-110 (Jun. 2000).
Shen et al., “Rate-Distortion Optimization for Fast Hierarchical B-Picture Transcoding,” IEEE, pp. 5279-5282 (2006).
Shoushun et al., “Adaptive-Quantization Digital Image Sensor for Low-Power Image Compression,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Regular Papers, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 13-25 (Jan. 2007).
Sjoberg et al., “Run-length Coding of Skipped Macroblocks,” ITU-T SG16/Q.6 VCEG-M57, pp. 1-5 (Apr. 2001).
Sony Electronics Inc., “Sony Vizaro DVD Encoder System DVA-V700,” 4 pp. (2001).
Sullivan, “Efficient scalar quantization of exponential and Laplacian random variables,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-42, No. 5, pp. 1365-1374 (Sep. 1996).
Sullivan et al., “Rate-Distortion Optimization for Video Compression,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 74-90 (Nov. 1998).
Sullivan et al., “The H.264/AVC Advanced V ideo Coding Standard: Overview and Introduction to the Fidelity Range Extensions,” 21 pp. (Aug. 2004).
Tao et al., “Adaptive Model-driven Bit Allocation for MPEG Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 147-157 (Feb. 2000).
Tescher, “Transform image coding,” Advances in Electronics and Electron. Physics, Suppl. 12, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113-115 (1979).
“The TML Project WEB-Page and Archive” (including pages of code marked “image.cpp for H.26L decoder, Copyright 1999” and “image.c”), 24 pp. [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jun. 1, 2005].
Triggs, “Empirical Filter Estimation for Subpixel Interpolation and Matching,” Int'l Conf. Computer Vision '01, Vancouver, Canada, 8 pp. (Jul. 2001).
Triggs, “Optimal Filters for Subpixel Interpolation and Matching,” Int'l Conf. Computer Vision '01, Vancouver, Canada, 10 pp. (Jul. 2001).
Tsang et al., “Fuzzy Based Rate Control for Real-Time MPEG Video,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 504-516 (1998).
“Video Coding for Low Bitrate Communication,” ITU-T Recommendation H.263 (1996).
“Video Coding Using Wavelet Decomposition for Very Low Bit-rate Networks,” 16 pp. (1997).
Wang et al., “Interlace Coding Tools for H.26L Video Coding,” ITU-T SG16/Q.6 VCEG-O37, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 2001).
Weiss et al., “Real Time Implementation of Subpixel Motion Estimation for Broadcast Applications,” pp. 7/1-7/3 (1990).
Wien, “Variable Block-Size Transforms for Hybrid Video Coding,” Dissertation, 182 pp. (Feb. 2004).
Wu et al., “Context-based adaptive lossless codec,” IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 45, pp. 437-444 (1997).
Wu et al., “Joint Estimation of Forward and Backward Motion Vectors for Interpolative Prediction of Video,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 684-687 (Sep. 1994).
Yang et al., “Rate Control for Videophone Using Local Perceptual Cues,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 496-507 (Apr. 2005).
Yang et al., “Very High Efficiency VLSI Chip-pair for Full Search Block Matching with Fractional Precision,” Proc. ICASSP/IEEE Int'l Conf. on Accoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, Glasgow, pp. 2437-2440 (May 1989).
Yu et al., “Two-Dimensional Motion Vector Coding for Low Bitrate Videophone Applications,” Proc. Int'l Conf. on Image Processing, Los Alamitos, US, pp. 414-417, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press (1995).
Yuen et al., “A survey of hybrid MC/DPCM/DCT video coding distortions,” Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 247-278 (1998).
Zhang et al., “Adaptive Field/Frame Selection for High Compression Coding,” SPIE Conf. on Image and Video Communications and Processing, 13 pp. (Jan. 2003).
“Embedded Zerotree Wavelet (EZW),” 13 pp.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 11 pp.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 13 pp.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 7 pp.
Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,166, 6 pp.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 20 pp.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2011, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp.
Impoco, “JPEG2000—a Short Tutorial,” 16 pp. (2004).
ISO/IEC, “10918-1: CCITT Recommendation T.81: Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous Tone Still Images,” pp. 337-547 (1992).
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation T.800: JPEG 2000 Image Coding System: Core Coding System,” 212 pp. (2002).
“JPEG 2000,” EEE 508—Lecture 18, 25 pp.
Kerofsky, “Core Experiment on Adaptive Block Transform,” ITU-T VCEG-M68, 3 pp. (Apr. 2001).
Kingsbury, “Use of Laplacian PDFs in Image Compression,” 5 pp. (2003).
Marcellin et al., “An Overview of JPEG-2000,” IEEE Data Compression Conference, 19 pp. (2000).
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 27, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/622,284, 7 pp.
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 11 pp.
Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/622,284, 14 pp.
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 8 pp.
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 13 pp.
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,166, 7 pp.
Office Action dated May 1, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 17 pp.
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp.
Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 11 pp.
Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2011, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp.
Santa Cruz et al., “An Analytical Study of JPEG 2000 Functionalities” / “JPEG 2000 Still Image Coding Versus Other Standards,” Proc. SPIE vol. 4115, 10 pp. (2000).
Taubman et al., “JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice,” pp. 110-113 and 348-353 (2002).
Taubman et al., “Embedded Block Coding in JPEG2000,” 4 pp. (2000).
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2019, from U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,094, 8 pp.
Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2019, from U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,094, 36 pp.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180352238 A1 Dec 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60488710 Jul 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10893168 Jul 2004 US
Child 12815029 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15068325 Mar 2016 US
Child 16101173 US
Parent 12815029 Jun 2010 US
Child 15068325 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10623195 Jul 2003 US
Child 10893168 US