A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by any one of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The invention relates generally to video and other digital media coding and decoding, and more particularly relates to signaling DC coefficients in video and other digital media coding and decoding.
With the increased popularity of DVDs, music delivery over the Internet, and digital cameras, digital media have become commonplace. Engineers use a variety of techniques to process digital audio, video, and images efficiently while still maintaining quality. To understand these techniques, it helps to understand how the audio, video, and image information is represented and processed in a computer.
A computer processes media information as a series of numbers representing that information. For example, a single number may represent the intensity of brightness or the intensity of a color component such as red, green or blue for each elementary small region of a picture, so that the digital representation of the picture consists of one or more arrays of such numbers. Each such number may be referred to as a sample. For a color image, it is conventional to use more than one sample to represent the color of each elemental region, and typically three samples are used. The set of these samples for an elemental region may be referred to as a pixel, where the word “pixel” is a contraction referring to the concept of a “picture element.” For example, one pixel may consist of three samples that represent the intensity of red, green and blue light necessary to represent the elemental region. Such a pixel type is referred to as an RGB pixel. Several factors affect quality, including sample depth, resolution, and frame rate (for video).
Sample depth is a property normally measured in bits that indicates the range of numbers that can be used to represent a sample. When more values are possible for the sample, quality can be higher because the number can capture more subtle variations in intensity and/or a greater range of values. Images with higher resolution tend to look crisper than other images and contain more discernable useful details. Video with higher frame rate tends to mimic the smooth motion of natural objects better than other video, and can similarly be considered to contain more detail in the temporal dimension. For all of these factors, the tradeoff for high quality is the cost of storing and transmitting the information in terms of the bit rate necessary to represent the sample depth, resolution and frame rate, as Table 1 shows.
Despite the high bit rate necessary for sending high quality video (such as HDTV), companies and consumers increasingly depend on computers to create, distribute, and play back high quality content. For this reason, engineers use compression (also called source coding or source encoding) to reduce the bit rate of digital media. Compression decreases the cost of storing and transmitting the information by converting the information into a lower bit rate form. Decompression (also called decoding) reconstructs a version of the original information from the compressed form. A “codec” is an encoder/decoder system. Two categories of compression are lossless compression and lossy compression.
Lossless compression reduces the bit rate of information by removing redundancy from the information without any reduction in fidelity. For example, a series often consecutive pixels that are all exactly the same shade of red could be represented as a code for the particular shade of red and the number ten as a “run length” of consecutive pixels, and this series can be perfectly reconstructed by decompression from the code for the shade of red and the indicated number (ten) of consecutive pixels having that shade of red. Lossless compression techniques reduce bit rate at no cost to quality, but can only reduce bit rate up to a certain point. Decreases in bit rate are limited by the inherent amount of variability in the statistical characterization of the input data, which is referred to as the source entropy. Entropy coding is another term for lossless compression.
In contrast, with lossy compression, the quality suffers somewhat but the achievable decrease in bit rate is more dramatic. For example, a series of ten pixels, each being a slightly different shade of red, can be approximated as ten pixels with exactly the same particular approximate red color. Lossy compression techniques can be used to reduce bit rate more than lossless compression techniques, but some of the reduction in bit rate is achieved by reducing quality, and the lost quality cannot be completely recovered. Lossy compression is often used in conjunction with lossless compression—in a system design in which the lossy compression establishes an approximation of the information and lossless compression techniques are applied to represent the approximation. For example, the series often pixels, each a slightly different shade of red, can be represented as a code for one particular shade of red and the number ten as a run-length of consecutive pixels. In decompression, the original series would then be reconstructed as ten pixels with the same approximated red color.
According to one possible definition, quantization is a term used for an approximating non-reversible mapping function commonly used for lossy compression, in which there is a specified set of possible output values, and each member of the set of possible output values has an associated set of input values that result in the selection of that particular output value. A variety of quantization techniques have been developed, including scalar or vector, uniform or non-uniform, and adaptive or non-adaptive quantization.
A. Scalar Quantizers
According to one possible definition, a scalar quantizer is an approximating functional mapping x→Q[x] of an input value x to a quantized value Q[x].
A scalar quantizer can be decomposed into two distinct stages. The first stage is the classifier stage, in which a classifier function mapping x→A[x] maps an input x to a quantization index A[x], which is often integer-valued. In essence, the classifier segments an input number line or data set.
In the second stage, a reconstructor functional mapping k→β[k] maps each quantization index k to a reconstruction value β[k]. In essence, the reconstructor places steps having a particular height relative to the input number line segments (or selects a subset of data set values) for reconstruction of each region determined by the classifier. The reconstructor functional mapping may be implemented, for example, using a lookup table. Overall, the classifier relates to the reconstructor as follows:
Q[x]=β[A[x]] (1).
The distortion introduced by using such a quantizer may be computed with a difference-based distortion measure d(x−Q[x]). Typically, such a distortion measure has the property that d(x−Q[x]) increases as x−Q[x] deviates from zero; and typically each reconstruction value lies within the range of the corresponding classification region, so that the straight line that would be formed by the functional equation Q[x]=x will pass through every step of the staircase diagram (as shown in
B. Dead Zone+Uniform Threshold Quantizers
According to one possible definition, a dead zone plus uniform threshold quantizer [“DZ+UTQ” ] is a quantizer with uniformly spaced threshold values for all classifier regions except the one containing the zero input value (which is called the dead zone [“DZ” ]). A DZ+UTQ has a classifier index mapping rule x→A[x] that can be expressed based on two parameters.
where └⋅┘ denotes the smallest integer less than or equal to the argument and where sign(x) is the function defined as:
In some system designs (not shown), an additional consideration may be necessary to fully characterize a DZ+UTQ classification rule. For practical reasons there may be a need to limit the range of values that can result from the classification function A[x] to some reasonable finite range. This limitation is referred to as clipping. For example, in some such systems the classification rule could more precisely be defined as:
where g is a limit on the absolute value of A[x]. In much of the theoretical analysis presented herein, consideration of clipping is omitted as it unduly complicates the analysis without advancing the explanation. Moreover, although the clipping shown in the above example is symmetric about zero, the clipping does not need to be symmetric, and often is not exactly symmetric. For example, a common clipping range would be such that the value of A[x] is limited to some range from −2B to +2B−1 so that A[x] can be represented as an integer using a two's complement representation that uses B+1 bits, where B+1 may be equal to 8 or 16 or another particular selected number of bits.
C. Reconstruction Rules
Different reconstruction rules may be used to determine the reconstruction value for each quantization index. These include the optimal reconstruction rule and the single offset reconstruction rule (of which the mid-point reconstruction rule is an example).
In general, a probability distribution function [“pdf”] indicates the probabilities for the different values of a variable. One possible definition of the optimal reconstruction value rj,opt for each region between two neighboring thresholds tj and tj+1 for a pdf ƒ(x) can be expressed as:
Assuming that the pdf ƒ(x) for a given source is symmetric around zero, one possible definition of the optimal reconstruction rule of a DZ+UTQ for a symmetric, difference-based distortion measure d(|x−y|) is:
where y is the quantized value Q[x], and where the rule finds the quantized value Q[x] that results in the smallest distortion according to the distortion measure. Typically, the optimal quantized value for β[0] is equal to 0, and that will be assumed to be true for the remainder of this description. For minimizing mean squared error, the optimal reconstruction rule sets the reconstruction value for each region equal to the conditional mean of the input values in that region. Stated more precisely, the optimal reconstruction value rj,opt for the region between two neighboring thresholds tj and tj+1 for a pdf ƒ(x) when using the mean squared error distortion measure is given by
According to one possible definition for a DZ+UTQ, the single-offset reconstruction rule is based on an offset parameter Δ, where ordinarily 0<Δ≤s/2, and the rule is:
The mid-point reconstruction rule is a special case of the single-offset reconstruction rule, specified by Δ=s/2. Mid-point reconstruction is commonly used for convenience due to its simplicity. And, in the limit as s becomes very small, the performance of the mid-point rule becomes optimal under a variety of well-behaved mathematical conditions.
D. Specifying Reconstruction Values, Constructing Classifiers
Standards and product specifications that focus only on achieving interoperability will often specify reconstruction values without necessarily specifying the classification rule. In other words, some specifications may define the functional mapping k→β[k] without defining the functional mapping x→A[x]. This allows a decoder built to comply with the standard/specification to reconstruct information correctly. In contrast, encoders are often given the freedom to change the classifier in any way that they wish, while still complying with the standard/specification.
Numerous systems for adjusting quantization thresholds have been developed. Many standards and products specify reconstruction values that correspond to a typical mid-point reconstruction rule (e.g., for a typical simple classification rule) for the sake of simplicity. For classification, however, the thresholds can in fact be adjusted so that certain input values will be mapped to more common (and hence, lower bit rate) indices, which makes the reconstruction values closer to optimal.
For optimal encoding, an encoder may adjust quantization thresholds to optimally fit a given set of reconstruction values q follows. The probability pj for the source random variable X to fall within a range j between tj and tj+1 (where tj+1>tj) for a source pdf ƒ(x) is:
and the number of bits necessary to represent an event with probability pj in an ideal lossless communication system may be quantified as:
where the hj is expressed in terms of bits. The total entropy of the classifier is then given by
In general, if the encoder is required to use b bits to indicate the selection of the reconstruction value rj, the encoder may evaluate and optimize its thresholds according to minimization of the rate-distortion relation D+λR, where D indicates distortion, R indicates bit usage, and X is a tuning parameter for favoring a particular selected balance between distortion and bit rate. For each particular threshold tj+1 between two points rj and rj+1, the encoder can set tj+1 to the x that satisfies:
d(x−rj)+λbj=d(x−rj+1)+λbj+1 (12).
In an ideal design, bj will be approximately equal to hj, and modern lossless coding techniques can be used to very nearly achieve this goal. In a design using some non-ideal lossless coding technique to represent the output of the classifier, bj may have some other value.
Note in summation that optimal decision thresholds can be selected using equation (12), that optimal reconstruction values can be selected using equation (5) or (7), and that optimal bit usage can be computed by setting bj equal to hj as given by equation (10) or to the number of bits used in some other lossless code (such as a Huffman code designed using equation (9) or a fixed-length code). In some highly-optimized scalar quantizer system designs, reconstruction values (initially uniformly spaced) are analyzed to adjust thresholds in encoder analysis, then use of the adjusted thresholds is analyzed to set the number of bits needed to represent the output of the classifier using lossless coding and to set the reconstruction values in decoder analysis. The new reconstruction values are then analyzed to adjust thresholds, and so on, until the thresholds and/or reconstruction values stabilize across iterations.
In general, video compression techniques include “intra-picture” compression and “inter-picture” compression, where a picture is, for example, a progressively scanned video frame, an interlaced video frame (having alternating lines for video fields), or an interlaced video field. For progressive frames, intra-picture compression techniques compress individual frames (typically called I-frames or key frames), and inter-picture compression techniques compress frames (typically called predicted frames, P-frames, or B-frames) with reference to preceding and/or following frames (typically called reference or anchor frames).
Both intra and inter-picture compression techniques often use a reversible frequency transform operation, which generates a set of frequency domain (i.e., spectral) coefficients. For intra-picture compression, the transform is typically applied to a block of samples. For inter-picture compression, the transform is typically applied to a block of motion-compensation prediction residual information. A discrete cosine transform [“DCT” ] is a type of frequency transform. The resulting blocks of transform coefficients are quantized and entropy encoded. A decoder typically entropy decodes and reconstructs transform coefficients (e.g., DCT coefficients) that were quantized and performs an inverse frequency transform such as an IDCT.
A. Intra-Compression in Windows Media Video, Version 8 [“WMV8”]
Microsoft Corporation's Windows Media Video, Version 8 [“WMV8” ] includes a video encoder and a video decoder. The WMV8 encoder uses intra-frame and inter-frame compression, and the WMV8 decoder uses intra-frame and inter-frame decompression.
Further encoding varies depending on whether a coefficient is a DC coefficient, an AC coefficient in the top row or left column, or another AC coefficient. The encoder encodes the DC coefficient (726) as a differential from the DC coefficient (736) of a neighboring 8×8 block, which is a previously encoded top or left neighbor block. The encoder entropy encodes (740) the differential. The entropy encoder can encode the left column or top row of AC coefficients as differentials from a corresponding column or row of a neighboring 8×8 block.
A WMV8 decoder (not shown) produces a reconstructed version of the original block (705). The decoder determines the DC predictor for the DC coefficient and decodes the DC differential. In particular, the following pseudocode illustrates the DC differential decoding process in WMV8.
The WMV8 decoder combines the DC differential with the predictor for the DC coefficient to reconstruct the DC coefficient. The decoder entropy decodes the AC coefficients using one or more run/level/last tables, and scans the coefficients back into a two-dimensional array. The WMV decoder computes a predictor for the top row or left column of AC coefficients if appropriate. The decoder inverse quantizes the coefficients and performs an IDCT.
While DC differential coding and decoding as in WMV8 provide good performance in many scenarios, there are opportunities for improvement. In particular, DC differential coding and decoding as in WMV8 are not easily applied for smaller quantization sizes. This is because at the smaller quantization sizes, VLC code table size for DC differentials becomes inefficiently large for many devices for practical applications.
B. Video Codec Standards
Various standards specify aspects of video decoders as well as formats for compressed video information. These standards include H.261, MPEG-1, H.262 (also called MPEG-2), H.263, and MPEG-4. Directly or by implication, these standards may specify certain encoder details, but other encoder details are not specified. Different standards incorporate different techniques, but each standard typically specifies some kind of inverse frequency transform and entropy decoding. For information, see the respective standard documents.
Described tools and techniques relate to coding of DC coefficients in video and other digital media coding. More particularly, the techniques and tools relate to signaling for DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes. The techniques and tools can be used in combination or independently.
According to a first set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a first code that indicates a DC differential for a DC coefficient and a second code that indicates a value refinement for the DC differential. For example, a video encoder encodes the DC coefficient based at least in part on the first and second codes. Or, a video decoder reconstructs the DC coefficient during decoding based at least in part on the first and second codes.
According to a second set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a VLC for a first DC differential for a first DC coefficient at a first quantization step size. The tool uses a VLC table that indicates DC differentials for DC coefficients at and above a second quantization step size larger than the first quantization step size.
According to a third set of tools and techniques, a tool such as a video encoder or decoder processes a code for a DC differential for a DC coefficient, where the code is a FLC having a length that varies depending on quantization step size. For example, the FLC indicates a refinement value for the DC differential. Or, when an escape code is used for the DC differential, the FLC indicates a value for the DC differential.
Additional features and advantages will be made apparent from the following detailed description of various embodiments that proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Described embodiments relate to techniques and tools for signaling DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes. The various techniques and tools can be used in combination or independently.
With reference to
A computing environment may have additional features. For example, the computing environment (800) includes storage (840), one or more input devices (850), one or more output devices (860), and one or more communication connections (870). An interconnection mechanism (not shown) such as a bus, controller, or network interconnects the components of the computing environment (800). Typically, operating system software (not shown) provides an operating environment for other software executing in the computing environment (800), and coordinates activities of the components of the computing environment (800).
The storage (840) may be removable or non-removable, and includes magnetic disks, magnetic tapes or cassettes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed within the computing environment (800). The storage (840) stores instructions for the software (880) implementing the encoder and/or decoder.
The input device(s) (850) may be a touch input device such as a keyboard, mouse, pen, or trackball, a voice input device, a scanning device, or another device that provides input to the computing environment (800). For audio or video encoding, the input device(s) (850) may be a sound card, video card, TV tuner card, or similar device that accepts audio or video input in analog or digital form, or a CD-ROM or CD-RW that reads audio or video samples into the computing environment (800). The output device(s) (860) may be a display, printer, speaker, CD-writer, or another device that provides output from the computing environment (800).
The communication connection(s) (870) enable communication over a communication medium to another computing entity. The communication medium conveys information such as computer-executable instructions, audio or video input or output, or other data in a modulated data signal. A modulated data signal is a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired or wireless techniques implemented with an electrical, optical, RF, infrared, acoustic, or other carrier.
The techniques and tools can be described in the general context of computer-readable media. Computer-readable media are any available media that can be accessed within a computing environment. By way of example, and not limitation, with the computing environment (800), computer-readable media include memory (820), storage (840), communication media, and combinations of any of the above.
The techniques and tools can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as those included in program modules, being executed in a computing environment on a target real or virtual processor. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, libraries, objects, classes, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or split between program modules as desired in various embodiments. Computer-executable instructions for program modules may be executed within a local or distributed computing environment.
The relationships shown between modules within the encoder and decoder indicate the main flow of information in the encoder and decoder; other relationships are not shown for the sake of simplicity. In particular,
The encoder (900) and decoder (1000) are block-based and use a 4:2:0 macroblock format, with each macroblock including four 8×8 luminance blocks (at times treated as one 16×16 macroblock) and two 8×8 chrominance blocks. Alternatively, the encoder (900) and decoder (1000) are object-based, use a different macroblock or block format, or perform operations on sets of pixels of different size or configuration than 8×8 blocks and 16×16 macroblocks.
Depending on implementation and the type of compression desired, modules of the encoder or decoder can be added, omitted, split into multiple modules, combined with other modules, and/or replaced with like modules. In alternative embodiments, encoders or decoders with different modules and/or other configurations of modules perform one or more of the described techniques.
A. Video Encoder
The encoder system (900) compresses predicted frames and key frames. For the sake of presentation,
A predicted frame (also called p-frame, b-frame for bi-directional prediction, or inter-coded frame) is represented in terms of prediction (or difference) from one or more other frames. A prediction residual is the difference between what was predicted and the original frame. In contrast, a key frame (also called an I-frame or intra-coded frame) is compressed without reference to other frames.
If the current frame (905) is a forward-predicted frame, a motion estimator (910) estimates motion of macroblocks or other sets of pixels of the current frame (905) with respect to a reference frame, which is a reconstructed previous frame (925) buffered in the frame store (920). In alternative embodiments, the reference frame is a later frame or the current frame is bi-directionally predicted. The motion estimator (910) can estimate motion by pixel, ½ pixel, ¼ pixel, or other increments, and can switch the precision of the motion estimation on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. The precision of the motion estimation can be the same or different horizontally and vertically. The motion estimator (910) outputs as side information motion information (915) such as motion vectors. A motion compensator (930) applies the motion information (915) to the reconstructed previous frame (925) to form a motion-compensated current frame (935). The prediction is rarely perfect, however, and the difference between the motion-compensated current frame (935) and the original current frame (905) is the prediction residual (945). Alternatively, a motion estimator and motion compensator apply another type of motion estimation/compensation.
For DC coefficients at small quantization step sizes, the encoder signals DC coefficients using a syntax and code tables such as those described below. In particular, the encoder uses the code tables and produces an output bitstream in compliance with the syntax below.
A frequency transformer (960) converts the spatial domain video information into frequency domain (i.e., spectral) data. For block-based video frames, the frequency transformer (960) applies a DCT or variant of DCT to blocks of the pixel data or prediction residual data, producing blocks of DCT coefficients. Alternatively, the frequency transformer (960) applies another conventional frequency transform such as a Fourier transform or uses wavelet or subband analysis. In embodiments in which the encoder uses spatial extrapolation (not shown in
A quantizer (970) then quantizes the blocks of spectral data coefficients. The quantizer applies uniform, scalar quantization to the spectral data with a step-size that varies on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. Alternatively, the quantizer applies another type of quantization to the spectral data coefficients, for example, a non-uniform, vector, or non-adaptive quantization, or directly quantizes spatial domain data in an encoder system that does not use frequency transformations. In addition to adaptive quantization, the encoder (900) can use frame dropping, adaptive filtering, or other techniques for rate control.
If a given macroblock in a predicted frame has no information of certain types (e.g., no motion information for the macroblock and no residual information), the encoder (900) may encode the macroblock as a skipped macroblock. If so, the encoder signals the skipped macroblock in the output bitstream of compressed video information (995).
When a reconstructed current frame is needed for subsequent motion estimation/compensation, an inverse quantizer (976) performs inverse quantization on the quantized spectral data coefficients. An inverse frequency transformer (966) then performs the inverse of the operations of the frequency transformer (960), producing a reconstructed prediction residual (for a predicted frame) or reconstructed samples (for an intra-coded frame). If the frame (905) being encoded is an intra-coded frame, then the reconstructed samples form the reconstructed current frame (not shown). If the frame (905) being encoded is a predicted frame, the reconstructed prediction residual is added to the motion-compensated predictions (935) to form the reconstructed current frame. The frame store (920) buffers the reconstructed current frame for use in predicting a next frame. In some embodiments, the encoder applies a deblocking filter to the reconstructed frame to adaptively smooth discontinuities between the blocks of the frame.
The entropy coder (980) compresses the output of the quantizer (970) as well as certain side information (e.g., motion information (915), spatial extrapolation modes, quantization step size). Typical entropy coding techniques include arithmetic coding, differential coding, Huffman coding, run length coding, LZ coding, dictionary coding, and combinations of the above. The entropy coder (980) typically uses different coding techniques for different kinds of information (e.g., DC coefficients, AC coefficients, different kinds of side information), and can choose from among multiple code tables within a particular coding technique.
The entropy coder (980) puts compressed video information (995) in the buffer (990). A buffer level indicator is fed back to bit rate adaptive modules. The compressed video information (995) is depleted from the buffer (990) at a constant or relatively constant bit rate and stored for subsequent streaming at that bit rate. Therefore, the level of the buffer (990) is primarily a function of the entropy of the filtered, quantized video information, which affects the efficiency of the entropy coding. Alternatively, the encoder system (900) streams compressed video information immediately following compression, and the level of the buffer (990) also depends on the rate at which information is depleted from the buffer (990) for transmission.
Before or after the buffer (990), the compressed video information (995) can be channel coded for transmission over the network. The channel coding can apply error detection and correction data to the compressed video information (995).
B. Video Decoder
The decoder system (1000) decompresses predicted frames and key frames. For the sake of presentation,
A buffer (1090) receives the information (1095) for the compressed video sequence and makes the received information available to the entropy decoder (1080). The buffer (1090) typically receives the information at a rate that is fairly constant over time, and includes a jitter buffer to smooth short-term variations in bandwidth or transmission. The buffer (1090) can include a playback buffer and other buffers as well. Alternatively, the buffer (1090) receives information at a varying rate. Before or after the buffer (1090), the compressed video information can be channel decoded and processed for error detection and correction.
The entropy decoder (1080) entropy decodes entropy-coded quantized data as well as entropy-coded side information (e.g., motion information (1015), spatial extrapolation modes, quantization step size), typically applying the inverse of the entropy encoding performed in the encoder. Entropy decoding techniques include arithmetic decoding, differential decoding, Huffman decoding, run length decoding, LZ decoding, dictionary decoding, and combinations of the above. The entropy decoder (1080) frequently uses different decoding techniques for different kinds of information (e.g., DC coefficients, AC coefficients, different kinds of side information), and can choose from among multiple code tables within a particular decoding technique.
If the frame (1005) to be reconstructed is a forward-predicted frame, a motion compensator (1030) applies motion information (1015) to a reference frame (1025) to form a prediction (1035) of the frame (1005) being reconstructed. For example, the motion compensator (1030) uses a macroblock motion vector to find a macroblock in the reference frame (1025). A frame buffer (1020) stores previous reconstructed frames for use as reference frames. The motion compensator (1030) can compensate for motion at pixel, ½ pixel, ¼ pixel, or other increments, and can switch the precision of the motion compensation on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. The precision of the motion compensation can be the same or different horizontally and vertically. Alternatively, a motion compensator applies another type of motion compensation. The prediction by the motion compensator is rarely perfect, so the decoder (1000) also reconstructs prediction residuals.
When the decoder needs a reconstructed frame for subsequent motion compensation, the frame store (1020) buffers the reconstructed frame for use in predicting a next frame. In some embodiments, the encoder applies a deblocking filter to the reconstructed frame to adaptively smooth discontinuities between the blocks of the frame.
An inverse quantizer (1070) inverse quantizes entropy-decoded data. In general, the inverse quantizer applies uniform, scalar inverse quantization to the entropy-decoded data with a step-size that varies on a frame-by-frame basis or other basis. Alternatively, the inverse quantizer applies another type of inverse quantization to the data, for example, a non-uniform, vector, or non-adaptive inverse quantization, or directly inverse quantizes spatial domain data in a decoder system that does not use inverse frequency transformations.
An inverse frequency transformer (1060) converts the quantized, frequency domain data into spatial domain video information. For block-based video frames, the inverse frequency transformer (1060) applies an IDCT or variant of IDCT to blocks of the DCT coefficients, producing pixel data or prediction residual data for key frames or predicted frames, respectively. Alternatively, the frequency transformer (1060) applies another conventional inverse frequency transform such as a Fourier transform or uses wavelet or subband synthesis. In embodiments in which the decoder uses spatial extrapolation (not shown in
The decoder (1000) processes DC coefficient information when quantization step sizes are small, for example, as described below.
An example bitstream includes information for a sequence of compressed progressive video frames or other pictures. The bitstream is organized into several hierarchical layers that are decoded by a decoder such as the decoder (1000) of
The QUANTIZER (1112) is a 2-bit fixed length code [“FLC” ] field that indicates the quantizer used for the sequence. The quantizer types are encoded according to the following Table 2.
For example, the picture header (1130) includes an intra transform DCT table (DCTDCTAB) element (1137). This field is present in P pictures and baseline I pictures (X8IF=0). DCTDCTAB (1137) is a 1-bit field that signals which of two sets of VLC tables is used to decode the transform DC coefficients in intra-coded blocks. If DCTDCTAB=0, then the low motion VLC tables (one for luminance DC, one for chrominance DC) are used. If DCTDCTAB=1 then the high motion VLC tables (one for luminance DC, one for chrominance DC) are used. The transform DC VLC tables are listed below.
The picture header (1130) includes a picture quantizer index (PQINDEX) element (1131). PQINDEX (1131) is a 5-bit field that signals the quantizer scale index for the entire frame. It is present in all picture types. If the implicit quantizer is used (signaled by sequence field QUANTIZER=00, see Table 2 above) then PQINDEX specifies both the picture quantizer scale (PQUANT) and the quantizer (3QP or 5QP deadzone) used for the frame. Table 3 shows how PQINDEX is translated to PQUANT and the quantizer for implicit mode.
If the quantizer is signaled explicitly at the sequence or frame level (signaled by sequence field QUANTIZER=01, 10 or 11, see Table 2 above) then PQINDEX is translated to the picture quantizer step size PQUANT as indicated by Table 4.
Alternatively, instead of the translation shown in Table 4, PQUANT is equal to PQINDEX for all values of PQINDEX from 1 through 31 when the quantizer is signaled explicitly at the sequence or frame level.
The picture header (1130) also includes a half QP step (HALFQP) element (1134) and picture quantizer type (PQUANTIZER) element (1135). HALFQP (1034) is a 1-bit field present if PQINDEX (1033) is less than or equal to 8. HALFQP (1134) allows the picture quantizer to be expressed in half step increments over the low PQUANT range. If HALFQP=1 then the picture quantizer step size is PQUANT+½. If HALFQP=0 then the picture quantizer step size is PQUANT. Therefore, if the 3QP deadzone quantizer is used then half step sizes are possible up to PQUANT=9 (i.e., PQUANT=1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 . . . 8.5, 9) and then only integer step sizes are allowable above PQUANT=9. For the 5QP deadzone quantizer, half step sizes are possible up to PQUANT=7 (i.e., 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 . . . 6.5, 7).
PQUANTIZER (1135) is a 1-bit field present in all frame types if the sequence level field QUANTIZER=01 (see Table 2 above). In this case, the quantizer used for the frame is specified by PQUANTIZER. If PQUANTIZER=0 then the 5QP deadzone quantizer is used for the frame. If PQUANTIZER=1 then the 3QP deadzone quantizer is used.
The picture header (1130) further includes a macroblock quantization (VODPQUANT) field (1136). VODPQUANT (1136) may be used to adjust quantization step sizes for macroblocks (e.g., macroblocks at one or more edges of a frame, or on a per macroblock basis). For additional detail about VODPQUANT (1136), see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/623,195, filed Jul. 18, 2003.
The DCCOEF (1161) field is only present in intra-coded blocks. This is a variable-length codeword that encodes a transform DC differential. The transform DC decoding process is described further below. One of two sets of code tables is used to encode the DC differentials (the table is signaled in the DCTDCTAB (1137) field in the picture header as described above). The DC VLC tables are also listed below.
The DCCOEFESC (1162) field is only present in intra-coded blocks and only if DCCOEF decodes to the escape code. The size of DCCOEFESC field can be 8, 9 or 10 bits depending on the quantization step size of the block.
DCSIGN (1163) is a 1-bit value that indicates the sign of the DC differential. If DCSIGN=0 then the DC differential is positive. If DCSIGN=1 then the DC differential is negative.
For typical intra-coded blocks, a decoder such as the decoder (1000) of
A. Decodine DC Differentials
The DC coefficient is coded differentially with respect to an already-decoded DC coefficient neighbor. This section describes the process used to decode the bitstream to obtain the DC differential.
If DCCOEF decodes to zero, the value of the DC differential is also zero. Otherwise, further decoding is done to determine the value of the DC differential. If DCCOEF decodes to the escape code, the absolute value of the DC differential is encoded in the DCCOEFESC field. The size of the DCCOEFESC field is 8, 9 or 10 bits depending on the quantization step size of the block. The sign of the DC differential is obtained from the DCSIGN field.
B. DC Differential VLC Tables
1. Low-Motion VLC Tables
2. High-Motion Tables
C. Computing DC Predictors
The quantized DC value for a current block is obtained by adding a DC predictor to the DC differential. The DC predictor is obtained from one of the previously decoded adjacent blocks, which may be labeled candidate predictors A (from the block immediately above and to the left of the current block), B (from the block immediately above the current block), and C (from the block immediately to the left of the current block). The values for A, B and C are the quantized DC values for the respective adjacent blocks.
In some cases there are missing adjacent blocks. If the current block is in the first block row of the frame, there are no A or B (and possibly no C). If the current block is in the first block column in the frame, there are no A and C (and possibly no B) blocks. For these cases the DC predictor is set to:
DCPredictor=(1024+(DCStepSize>>1))/DCStepSize,
where DCStepSize is a value described below.
Otherwise, a prediction direction is formed based on the values of A, B and C, and either the B or C predictor is chosen. The prediction direction is calculated as follows. If the absolute value of (A−B) is less than or equal to the absolute value of (A−C), then the prediction is made from the left (C is the predictor). Otherwise, the prediction is made from the top (B is the predictor).
The quantized DC coefficient is then calculated by adding the DC differential and the DC predictor as follows:
DCCoeffQ=DCPredictor+DCDifferential
D. Inverse-Quantization for Baseline I-Frame Pictures
In each macroblock of a picture frame, the decoder decodes a DC coefficient and set of AC coefficients, which were each quantized at the encoder. These quantized transform coefficients are dequantized for a baseline I-Frame picture as described below.
1. DC Inverse-Quantization
The quantized DC coefficient (DCCoeffQ) is reconstructed by performing the following de-quantization operation:
DCCoefficient=DCCoeffQ*DCStepSize
The value of DCStepSize is based on the value of PQUANT as follows:
For PQUANT equal to 1 or 2:
DCStepSize=2*PQUANT
For PQUANT equal to 3 or 4:
DCStepSize=8
For PQUANT greater than or equal to 5:
DCStepSize=PQUANT/2+6
2. Inverse AC Coefficient Quantization
AC coefficients are separately decoded. Depending on whether the 3-QP or 5-QP deadzone quantizer is used, the non-zero quantized AC coefficients are inverse quantized according to the following formula:
dequant_coeff=quant_coeff*double_quant (if 3−QP deadzone quantizer), or
dequant_coeff=quant_coeff*double_quant+sign(quant_coeff)*quant_scale (if 5-QP deadzone quantizer)
where:
PQUANT is encoded in the picture layer as described above. HalfStep is encoded in the picture layer as via the HALFQP element as described above.
In the implementation described in detail above, the range for differential DC coefficients becomes larger as the quantization step size becomes smaller. For example, the range for a quantization step size of 2 is twice as large as the range for a quantization step size of 4. Further, the range for quantization step size of 1 is four times the range for quantization step size of 4. A VLC table used to directly encode/decode the differential DC coefficient for such small step sizes would need to be very large and would impose excessive memory requirements in some cases (e.g., in small footprint devices). Further, as the lowest quantization step sizes are infrequently or rarely used in practical encoding scenarios, the cost of this additional memory requirement would not be justified.
The problem of excessively large VLC tables for very small quantization sizes is addressed in this implementation by designing the VLC tables to accommodate the range of differential DC coefficients when the quantization step size is 4. Then, for smaller quantization step sizes (e.g., 1 and 2), a multistage approach is used to signal the differential DC coefficient. More specifically, at a quantization step size of 2, a standard VLC table is used to decode a base VLC for the differential DC coefficient. An additional 1-bit code is also decoded, and this is used to refine the value of the differential DC coefficient. At a quantization step size of 1, a standard VLC table again is used to decode a base VLC for the differential DC coefficient. An additional 2-bit code is also decoded and used to refine the value of the differential DC coefficient.
When the base VLC represents the escape code, a further FLC is used to signal the differential DC coefficient. The size of the FLC changes with the quantization step size. For example, the FLC is 8 bits for quantization steps sizes over 2, and 9 and 10 bits for quantization step sizes of 2 and 1, respectively. This reduces bit rate for the escape code FLCs for higher quantization step sizes.
Having described and illustrated the principles of our invention, it will be recognized that the various embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. It should be understood that the programs, processes, or methods described herein are not related or limited to any particular type of computing environment, unless indicated otherwise. Various types of general purpose or specialized computing environments may be used with or perform operations in accordance with the teachings described herein. Elements of embodiments shown in software may be implemented in hardware and vice versa.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of our invention may be applied, we claim as our invention all such embodiments as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/068,325, filed Mar. 11, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/815,029, filed Jun. 14, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,313,509, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168, filed Jul. 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,554, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/488,710, filed Jul. 18, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/893,168 also is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/623,195, filed Jul. 18, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,602,851, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4454546 | Mori | Jun 1984 | A |
4583114 | Catros | Apr 1986 | A |
4661849 | Hinman | Apr 1987 | A |
4661853 | Roeder et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4679079 | Catros et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4691329 | Juri et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4695882 | Wada et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4774574 | Daly et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4796087 | Guichard et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800432 | Barnett et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4849812 | Borgers et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862264 | Wells et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862267 | Gillard et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864393 | Harradine et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4965830 | Barham et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4992889 | Yamagami et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5021879 | Vogel | Jun 1991 | A |
5068724 | Krause et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5072295 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091782 | Krause et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103306 | Weiman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5128758 | Azadegan et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136377 | Johnston et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157490 | Kawai et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5175618 | Ueda | Dec 1992 | A |
5179442 | Azadegan et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5223949 | Honjo | Jun 1993 | A |
5237410 | Inoue | Aug 1993 | A |
5241395 | Chen | Aug 1993 | A |
5253058 | Gharavi | Oct 1993 | A |
5258836 | Murata | Nov 1993 | A |
5298991 | Yagasaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301242 | Gonzales et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303058 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317396 | Fujinami | May 1994 | A |
5317672 | Crossman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5374958 | Yanagihara | Dec 1994 | A |
5412430 | Nagata | May 1995 | A |
RE34965 | Sugiyama | Jun 1995 | E |
5422676 | Herpel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424779 | Odaka | Jun 1995 | A |
5428396 | Yagasaki | Jun 1995 | A |
5442400 | Sun | Aug 1995 | A |
5448297 | Alattar et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452104 | Lee | Sep 1995 | A |
5461421 | Moon | Oct 1995 | A |
RE35093 | Wang et al. | Nov 1995 | E |
5467086 | Jeong | Nov 1995 | A |
5467136 | Odaka | Nov 1995 | A |
5477272 | Zhang | Dec 1995 | A |
5481553 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
RE35158 | Sugiyama | Feb 1996 | E |
5510840 | Yonemitsu et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5539466 | Igarashi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544286 | Laney | Aug 1996 | A |
5552832 | Astle | Sep 1996 | A |
5559557 | Kato | Sep 1996 | A |
5565920 | Lee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565922 | Krause | Oct 1996 | A |
5587708 | Chiu | Dec 1996 | A |
5594504 | Ebrahimi | Jan 1997 | A |
5606371 | Gunnewick et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623311 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623424 | Azadegan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631644 | Katata et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654760 | Ohtsuki | Aug 1997 | A |
5657087 | Jeong et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659365 | Wilkinson | Aug 1997 | A |
5663763 | Yagasaki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666461 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668932 | Laney | Sep 1997 | A |
5673370 | Laney | Sep 1997 | A |
5692063 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699476 | Van Der Meer | Dec 1997 | A |
5701164 | Kato | Dec 1997 | A |
5731836 | Lee | Mar 1998 | A |
5731837 | Hurst, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739861 | Music | Apr 1998 | A |
5748789 | Lee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751358 | Suzuki et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751379 | Markandey et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761088 | Hulyalkar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764803 | Jacquin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764814 | Chen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784175 | Lee | Jul 1998 | A |
5786856 | Hall et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787203 | Lee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796855 | Lee | Aug 1998 | A |
5799113 | Lee | Aug 1998 | A |
RE35910 | Nagata et al. | Sep 1998 | E |
5802213 | Gardos | Sep 1998 | A |
5809178 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819035 | Devaney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825310 | Tsutsui | Oct 1998 | A |
5825929 | Chen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835145 | Ouyang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835237 | Ebrahimi | Nov 1998 | A |
5844613 | Chaddha | Dec 1998 | A |
5847776 | Khmelnitsky | Dec 1998 | A |
5867167 | Deering | Feb 1999 | A |
5870435 | Choi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874995 | Naimpally et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883672 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901248 | Fandrianto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929940 | Jeannin | Jul 1999 | A |
5946042 | Kato | Aug 1999 | A |
5946043 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946419 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949489 | Nishikawa et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959673 | Lee | Sep 1999 | A |
5959674 | Jang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963258 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963673 | Kodama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969764 | Sun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970173 | Lee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970175 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973743 | Han | Oct 1999 | A |
5973755 | Gabriel | Oct 1999 | A |
5974184 | Eifrig et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982437 | Okazaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982438 | Lin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990957 | Ryoo | Nov 1999 | A |
5990960 | Murakami et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991447 | Eifrig et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002439 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005980 | Eifrig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36507 | Iu | Jan 2000 | E |
6011596 | Burl | Feb 2000 | A |
6026088 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026195 | Eifrig et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040863 | Kato | Mar 2000 | A |
6058362 | Malvar | May 2000 | A |
6067322 | Wang | May 2000 | A |
6072831 | Chen | Jun 2000 | A |
6084636 | Fujiwara | Jul 2000 | A |
6088392 | Rosenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6094225 | Han | Jul 2000 | A |
RE36822 | Sugiyama | Aug 2000 | E |
6097759 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104751 | Artieri | Aug 2000 | A |
6118817 | Wang | Sep 2000 | A |
6125140 | Wilkinson | Sep 2000 | A |
6130963 | Uz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148107 | Ducloux et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148109 | Boon | Nov 2000 | A |
6154495 | Yamaguchi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160846 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167091 | Okada et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182034 | Malvar | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188725 | Sugiyama | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188794 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201927 | Comer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205176 | Sugiyama | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208761 | Passagio et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212232 | Reed et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219070 | Baker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219464 | Greggain et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223162 | Chen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233017 | Chaddha | May 2001 | B1 |
6240380 | Malvar | May 2001 | B1 |
RE37222 | Yonemitsu | Jun 2001 | E |
6243418 | Kim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243497 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249614 | Bocharova et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256422 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256423 | Krishnamurthy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259810 | Gill et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263024 | Matsumoto | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271885 | Sugiyama | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6275531 | Li | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275614 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278735 | Mohsenian | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281942 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282243 | Kazui et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292585 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292588 | Shen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295376 | Nakaya | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304928 | Mairs et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307887 | Gabriel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307973 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6320593 | Sachs et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324216 | Igarashi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337881 | Chaddha | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347116 | Haskell et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356709 | Abe et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370502 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377628 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381279 | Taubman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393155 | Bright et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404813 | Haskell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418166 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430316 | Wilkinson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438167 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441842 | Fandrianto et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456744 | Lafe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463100 | Cho et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466620 | Lee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473534 | Merhav et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490319 | Yang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493385 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496601 | Migdal et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519284 | Pesquet-Popescu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529632 | Nakaya et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539056 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546049 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563953 | Lin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571019 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573905 | MacInnis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593925 | Hakura et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606418 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6646578 | Au | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647061 | Panusopone et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647152 | Willis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650781 | Nakaya | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654417 | Hui | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678422 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687294 | Yan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704718 | Burges et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721359 | Bist et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728317 | Demos | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738423 | Lainema et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6759999 | Doyen | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765962 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771830 | Goldstein et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785331 | Jozawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792157 | Koshi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795584 | Karczewicz et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801572 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810083 | Chen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6831947 | Ribas Corbera | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873654 | Rackett | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876703 | Ismaeil et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882753 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6947045 | Ostermann et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6970479 | Abrahamsson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990242 | Malvar | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020204 | Auvray et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027507 | Wu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035473 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042941 | Laksono et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058127 | Lu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099389 | Yu et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7110455 | Wu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7426308 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7580584 | Lin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7602851 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7738554 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8218624 | Holcomb et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010048718 | Bruls et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020044602 | Ohki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020136308 | Le Maguet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154693 | Demos et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168066 | Li | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186890 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009722 | Sugiyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021482 | Lan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030099292 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112864 | Karczewicz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113026 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128754 | Akimoto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142748 | Tourapis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152146 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156646 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185305 | MacInnis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194010 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215011 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040022316 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042549 | Huang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090397 | Doyen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040136457 | Funnell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141654 | Yi-Yung | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040264568 | Florencio | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264580 | Chiang Wei Yin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013365 | Mukerjee et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013497 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013498 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013500 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015246 | Thumpudi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015259 | Thumpudi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036698 | Beom | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036699 | Holcomb et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036759 | Lin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041738 | Lin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052294 | Liang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053156 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094731 | Xu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100093 | Holcomb | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123274 | Crinon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135484 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147163 | Li et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152451 | Byun | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180502 | Puri | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207492 | Pao | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232501 | Mukerjee | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238096 | Holcomb et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254719 | Sullivan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060013307 | Olivier et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013309 | Ha et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060140267 | He et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070009039 | Ryu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009042 | Craig et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20100080297 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1327074 | Feb 1994 | CA |
0 279 053 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0397402 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0526163 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0535746 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 830 029 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0863675 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0884912 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0932306 | Jul 1999 | EP |
897363 | May 1962 | GB |
2343579 | May 2000 | GB |
61205086 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62 213 494 | Sep 1987 | JP |
3001688 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3 129 986 | Mar 1991 | JP |
6 078 298 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6078295 | Mar 1994 | JP |
7274171 | Oct 1995 | JP |
10 056 644 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2003061090 | Feb 2003 | JP |
6292188 | Oct 2004 | JP |
132895 | Oct 1998 | KR |
1020020005365 | Jan 2002 | KR |
WO 9721302 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 0021207 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0033581 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0207438 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03026296 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 04100554 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 04100556 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 05065030 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 06075895 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/341,674, filed Dec. 17, 2011, Lee et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/488,710, filed Jul. 18, 2003, Srinivasan et al. |
Ahmed et al., “Discrete Cosine Transform,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-23, No. 1, pp. 90-93 (Dec. 1984). |
Atzori et al., “Adaptive Anisotropic Filtering (AAF) for Real-Time Visual Enhancement of MPEG-Coded Video Sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 285-298 (May 2002). |
AVC-0323, Test Model Editing Committee, “Test Model 2, Draft Revision 1,” MPEG92/N0245, 171 pp. (1992). |
Bartkowiak et al., “Color Video Compression Based on Chrominance Vector Quantization,” 7th Int'l Workshop on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, IWSSIP 2000, Maribor 7-9 VI, pp. 107-110 (2000). |
Benzler et al., “Improving multiresolution motion compensating hybrid coding by drift reduction,” Picture Coding Symposium, 4 pp. (1996). |
Benzler et al., “Motion and aliasing compensating prediction with quarter-pel accuracy and adaptive overlapping blocks as proposal for MPEG-4 tool evaluation—Technical description,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG 95/0552, 5 pp., document marked 1995. |
Benzler, “Results of core experiment P8 (Motion an Aliasing compensating Prediction),” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG97/2625, 8 pp., document marked 1997. |
Bist et al., “Adaptive Quantization for Low Bit Rate Video Coding,” Proc. 1998 Int'l Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP 98), pp. 925-928 (1998). |
Borman et al., “Block-matching Sub-pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—an Empirical Performance Evaluation,” SPIE Visual Comm. & Image Processing, 10 pp. (1999). |
Chisu, “Techniques for Accelerating Intensity-Based Rigid Image Registration,” Thesis dated Jan. 15, 2005. |
Clarke, “Image and Video Compression: A Survey,” Wiley InterScience Journal Abstract, 2 pp., http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jan. 25, 2006]. |
Conklin et al., “Multi-resolution Motion Estimation,” Proc. ICASSP '97, Munich, Germany, 4 pp. (1997). |
Davis et al., “Equivalence of subpixel motion estimators based on optical flow and block matching,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Symposium on Computer Vision, pp. 7-12 (1995). |
De Haan et al., “Sub-pixel motion estimation with 3-D recursive search block-matching,” Signal Processing: Image Comm. 6, pp. 229-239 (1994). |
“DivX Multi Standard Video Encoder,” 2 pp. (Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jan. 24, 2006). |
Ebrahimi, “MPEG-4 Video Verification Model Version 10.0,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/N1992, pp. 1, 43-52, 72-74, 123-130, and 190, document marked 1998. |
Ericsson, “Fixed and Adaptive Predictors for Hybrid Predictive/Transform Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Comm., vol. COM-33, No. 12, pp. 1291-1302 (1985). |
Farvardin et al., “Optimum quantizer performance for a class of non-Gaussian memoryless sources,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-30, No. 3, pp. 485-497 (May 1984). |
“A Fast Precise Implementation of 8×8 Discrete Cosine Transform Using the Streaming SIMD Extensions and MMX™ Instructions,” Version 1.0, 25 pp. (Apr. 1999). |
Flierl et al., “A Video Codec Incorporating Block-Based Multi-Hypothesis Motion-Compensated Prediction,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Visual Communications and image Processing, Perth, Australia, vol. 4067, pp. 238-249 (Jun. 2000). |
Flierl et al., “Generalized B Pictures and the Draft H.264/AVC Video Compression Standard,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 587-597 (Jul. 2003). |
Flierl et al., “Multihypothesis Motion Estimation for Video Coding,” Proc. DCC, 10 pp. (Mar. 2001). |
Foos et al., “JPEG 2000 compression of medical imagery,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3980, pp. 85-96 (2000). |
Garrigues et al., “Atom position coding in a matching pursuit based video coder,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4 pp. (2005). |
Girod, “Efficiency Analysis of Multihypothesis Motion-Compensated Prediction for Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 173-183 (Feb. 2000). |
Girod, “Motion-Compensating Prediction with Fractional-Pel Accuracy,” IEEE Transactions on Comm., vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 604-612 (1993). |
Girod, “Motion Compensation: Visual Aspects, Accuracy, and Fundamental Limits,” Motion Analysis and Image Sequence Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125-152 (1993). |
Gish et al., “Asymptotically efficient quantizing,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-14, No. 5 (Sep. 1968). |
Golston et al., “Video codecs tutorial: Trade-offs with H.264, VC-1 and other advanced codecs,” Video/Imaging Design Line, 9 pp. (Mar. 2006). |
“H.264 & IPTV Over DSL—Enabling New Telco Revenue Opportunities,” White Paper, Intel/Envivio, May 15, 2004, available at http://www.envivio.com/images/products/H264whitepaper.pdf. |
Horn et al., “Estimation of Motion Vector Fields for Multiscale Motion Compensation,” Proc. Picture Coding Symp. (PCS 97), pp. 141-144 (Sep. 1997). |
Hsu et al., “A Low Bit-Rate Video Codec Based on Two-Dimensional Mesh Motion Compensation with Adaptive Interpolation,” IEEE, Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. II, No. 1, pp. 111-117 (Jan. 2001). |
Huang et al., “A Frame-Based MPEG Characteristics Extraction Tool and Its Application in Video Transcoding,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 48, No. 3, Aug. 2002, pp. 522-532. |
“ISO/IEC 11172-2 Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1.5 Mbit/s,” MPEG (Moving Pictures Expert Group), International Organization for Standardization, MPEG1 Video, 122 pp. (1993). |
“ISO/IEC 13818-2. Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information,” MPEG (Moving Pictures Expert Group), International Organization for Standardization, MPEG2 Video (1994). |
ISO/IEC, “Information Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects: Visual, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Committee Draft,” 330 pp. (1998). |
ISO/IEC, “Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information,” JTCI/SC29/WG11, MPEG-4 Video Verification Model (Feb. 1998). |
“ITU-T Recommendation T.6: Facsimile Coding Schemes and Coding Control Functions for Group 4 Facsimile Apparatus,” Facicle VII.3 of the Blue Book, (1988). |
ITU—Q15-F-24, “MVC Video Codec—Proposal for H.26L,” Study Group 16, Video Coding Experts Group (Question 15), 28 pp. (document marked as generated in 1998). |
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.261: Video Codec for Audiovisual Services at p×64 kbits,” 28 pp. (1993). |
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.262: Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information: Video,” 218 pp. (1995). |
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation H.263: Video Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication,” 167 pp. (1998). |
Iwahashi et al., “A Motion Compensation Technique for Downscaled Pictures in Layered Coding,” IEICE Transactions on Comm., vol. E77-B, No. 8, pp. 1007-1012 (Aug. 1994). |
Joint Video Team of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG, “Committee Draft of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Recommendation H.264, ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC,” 142 pp. (Aug. 2002). |
Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, “Draft ITU-T Recommendation and Final Draft International Standard of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264 ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC,” 253 pp. (May 2003). |
Joshi et al., “Comparison of generalized Gaussian and Laplacian modeling in DCT image coding,” IEEE Signal Proc. Letters, vol. SPL-2, No. 5, pp. 81-82 (May 1995). |
Keys, “Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-29, No. 6, pp. 1153-1160 (1981). |
Kim et al., “Still image coding based on vector quantization and fractal approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 587-597 (1996). |
Konrad et al., “On Motion Modeling and Estimation for Very Low Bit Rate Video Coding,” Visual Comm. & Image Processing (VCIP '95), 12 pp. (May 1995). |
Lam et al., “A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images,” IEEE Trans. Image Proc., vol. IP-9, No. 10, pp. 1661-1666 (Oct. 2000). |
LeGall, “MPEG: A Video Compression Standard for Multimedia Application,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 47-58 (Apr. 1991). |
LeGall, “The MPEG Video Compression Algorithm,” Signal Processing: Image Communication 4, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 129-140 (Apr. 1992). |
LeGall et al., “Transmission of HDTV signals under 140 Mbit/s using a subband decomposition and Discrete Cosine Transform coding,” in Signal Processing of HDTV, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287-293 (1988). |
Limb, “A Picture-Coding Algorithm for the Merli Scan,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 300-305 (Apr. 1973). |
Lloyd, “Least squares quantization in PCM,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-28, No. 2, pp. 7-12 (Mar. 1982) (reprint of work originally presented in Jul. 1957). |
Loomis, “Using the Advanced Settings of the Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile Codec,” 13 pp. (Document dated Apr. 2006) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on May 31, 2007]. |
Lopes et al., “Analysis of Spatial Transform Motion Estimation with Overlapped Compensation and Fractional-pixel Accuracy,” IEEE Proc. Visual Image Signal Processing, vol. 146, No. 6, pp. 339-344 (Dec. 1999). |
Lopresto et al., “Image Coding Based on Mixture Modeling of Wavelet Coefficients and a Fast Estimation-Quantization Framework,” Proc. IEEE Data Compression Conference, (Snowbird, UT), pp. 221-230 (Mar. 1997). |
Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. and Machine Intell., vol. PAMI-11, No. 7, pp. 674-692 (Jul. 1989). |
Marshall, “The Discrete Cosine Transform,” 4 pp. (document dated Oct. 4, 2001) [downloaded from the World Wide Web on Mar. 30, 2006]. |
Martinez-Fonte et al., “An Empirical Study on Corner Detection to Extract Buildings in Very High Resolution Satellite Images,” IEEE-ProRisc, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 288-293 (Nov. 2004). |
Masala et al., “Perceptually Optimized MPEG Compression of Synthetic Video Sequences,” Proc. ICIP, pp. I-601-I-604 (2005). |
Max, “Quantizing for minimum distortion,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-6, No. 1, pp. 7-12 (Mar. 1960). |
Microsoft Corporation, “Microsoft Debuts New Windows Media Player 9 Series, Redefining Digital Media on the PC,” 4 pp. (Sep. 4, 2002) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on May 14, 2004]. |
Mitra et al., “Two-Stage Color Palettization for Error Diffusion,” Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 207-217 (Jun. 2002). |
Mook, “Next-Gen Windows Media Player Leaks to the Web,” BetaNews, 17 pp. (Jul. 19, 2002) [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Aug. 8, 2003]. |
Morimoto et al., “Fast Electronic Digital Image Stabilization,” Proc. ICPR, Vienna, Austria, 5 pp. (1996). |
Muller, “Distribution shape of two-dimensional DCT coefficients of natural images,” IEE Electronics Letters, vol. 29, No. 22 (Oct. 1993). |
Murakami et al., “Comparison between DPCM and Hadamard transform coding in the composite coding of the NTSC color TV signal,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. COM-30, No. 3, pp. 469-479 (Mar. 1982). |
Musmann et al., “Advances in Picture Coding,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 523-548 (Apr. 1985). |
Neff et al., “Modulus Quantization for Matching Pursuit Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 895-912 (Sep. 2000). |
Nguyen et al., “Set Theoretic Compression with an Application to Image Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 1051-1056 (Jul. 1998). |
Nougaret et al., “Quick Tuning of a Reference Locomotion Gait,” IEEE Proc. Computer Animation '95, 8 pp. (1995). |
“Overview of MPEG-2 Test Model 5,” 5 pp. [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Mar. 1, 2006]. |
Park et al., “A post processing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technology, vol. 9, pp. 161-171 (Feb. 1999). |
Printouts of FTP directories from http://ftp3.itu.ch , 8 pp. (downloaded from the World Wide Web on Sep. 20, 2005.). |
Puri et al., “Motion-Compensated Video Coding with Adaptive Perceptual Quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 351-361 (Dec. 1991). |
Reader, “History of MPEG Video Compression—Ver. 4.0,” 99 pp., (document marked Dec. 16, 2003). |
Reininger et al., “Distribution of two-dimensional DCT coefficients for images,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. COM-31, No. 6, pp. 835-839 (Jun. 1983). |
Ribas-Corbera et al., “On the Optimal Block Size for Block-based Motion-Compensated Video Coders,” SPIE Proc. of Visual Comm. & Image Processing, vol. 3024, 12 pp. (1997). |
Ribas-Corbera et al., “On the Optimal Motion Vector Accuracy for Block-based Motion-Compensated Video Coders,” Proc. SPIE Digital Video Compression, San Jose, CA, 13 pp. (1996). |
Ribas Corbera et al., “Rate Control in DCT Video Coding for Low-Delay Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 172-185 (Feb. 1999). |
Schultz et al., “Subpixel Motion Estimation for Super-Resolution Image Sequence Enhancement,” Journal of Visual Comm. & Image Representation, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 38-50 (Mar. 1998). |
Schuster et al., “A Theory for the Optimal Bit Allocation Between Displacement Vector Field and Displaced Frame Difference,” IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1739-1751 (Dec. 1997). |
Shanableh et al., “Heterogeneous Video Transcoding to Lower Spatio-Temporal Resolutions and Different Encoding Formats,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 101-110 (Jun. 2000). |
Shen et al., “Rate-Distortion Optimization for Fast Hierarchical B-Picture Transcoding,” IEEE, pp. 5279-5282 (2006). |
Shoushun et al., “Adaptive-Quantization Digital Image Sensor for Low-Power Image Compression,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Regular Papers, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 13-25 (Jan. 2007). |
Sjoberg et al., “Run-length Coding of Skipped Macroblocks,” ITU-T SG16/Q.6 VCEG-M57, pp. 1-5 (Apr. 2001). |
Sony Electronics Inc., “Sony Vizaro DVD Encoder System DVA-V700,” 4 pp. (2001). |
Sullivan, “Efficient scalar quantization of exponential and Laplacian random variables,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-42, No. 5, pp. 1365-1374 (Sep. 1996). |
Sullivan et al., “Rate-Distortion Optimization for Video Compression,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 74-90 (Nov. 1998). |
Sullivan et al., “The H.264/AVC Advanced V ideo Coding Standard: Overview and Introduction to the Fidelity Range Extensions,” 21 pp. (Aug. 2004). |
Tao et al., “Adaptive Model-driven Bit Allocation for MPEG Video Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 147-157 (Feb. 2000). |
Tescher, “Transform image coding,” Advances in Electronics and Electron. Physics, Suppl. 12, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113-115 (1979). |
“The TML Project WEB-Page and Archive” (including pages of code marked “image.cpp for H.26L decoder, Copyright 1999” and “image.c”), 24 pp. [Downloaded from the World Wide Web on Jun. 1, 2005]. |
Triggs, “Empirical Filter Estimation for Subpixel Interpolation and Matching,” Int'l Conf. Computer Vision '01, Vancouver, Canada, 8 pp. (Jul. 2001). |
Triggs, “Optimal Filters for Subpixel Interpolation and Matching,” Int'l Conf. Computer Vision '01, Vancouver, Canada, 10 pp. (Jul. 2001). |
Tsang et al., “Fuzzy Based Rate Control for Real-Time MPEG Video,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 504-516 (1998). |
“Video Coding for Low Bitrate Communication,” ITU-T Recommendation H.263 (1996). |
“Video Coding Using Wavelet Decomposition for Very Low Bit-rate Networks,” 16 pp. (1997). |
Wang et al., “Interlace Coding Tools for H.26L Video Coding,” ITU-T SG16/Q.6 VCEG-O37, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 2001). |
Weiss et al., “Real Time Implementation of Subpixel Motion Estimation for Broadcast Applications,” pp. 7/1-7/3 (1990). |
Wien, “Variable Block-Size Transforms for Hybrid Video Coding,” Dissertation, 182 pp. (Feb. 2004). |
Wu et al., “Context-based adaptive lossless codec,” IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 45, pp. 437-444 (1997). |
Wu et al., “Joint Estimation of Forward and Backward Motion Vectors for Interpolative Prediction of Video,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 684-687 (Sep. 1994). |
Yang et al., “Rate Control for Videophone Using Local Perceptual Cues,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 496-507 (Apr. 2005). |
Yang et al., “Very High Efficiency VLSI Chip-pair for Full Search Block Matching with Fractional Precision,” Proc. ICASSP/IEEE Int'l Conf. on Accoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, Glasgow, pp. 2437-2440 (May 1989). |
Yu et al., “Two-Dimensional Motion Vector Coding for Low Bitrate Videophone Applications,” Proc. Int'l Conf. on Image Processing, Los Alamitos, US, pp. 414-417, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press (1995). |
Yuen et al., “A survey of hybrid MC/DPCM/DCT video coding distortions,” Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 247-278 (1998). |
Zhang et al., “Adaptive Field/Frame Selection for High Compression Coding,” SPIE Conf. on Image and Video Communications and Processing, 13 pp. (Jan. 2003). |
“Embedded Zerotree Wavelet (EZW),” 13 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 11 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 13 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 7 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,166, 6 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 20 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2011, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp. |
Impoco, “JPEG2000—a Short Tutorial,” 16 pp. (2004). |
ISO/IEC, “10918-1: CCITT Recommendation T.81: Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous Tone Still Images,” pp. 337-547 (1992). |
ITU-T, “ITU-T Recommendation T.800: JPEG 2000 Image Coding System: Core Coding System,” 212 pp. (2002). |
“JPEG 2000,” EEE 508—Lecture 18, 25 pp. |
Kerofsky, “Core Experiment on Adaptive Block Transform,” ITU-T VCEG-M68, 3 pp. (Apr. 2001). |
Kingsbury, “Use of Laplacian PDFs in Image Compression,” 5 pp. (2003). |
Marcellin et al., “An Overview of JPEG-2000,” IEEE Data Compression Conference, 19 pp. (2000). |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 27, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/622,284, 7 pp. |
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2006, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 11 pp. |
Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/622,284, 14 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 8 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 13 pp. |
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,166, 7 pp. |
Office Action dated May 1, 2008, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/623,195, 17 pp. |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp. |
Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,168, 11 pp. |
Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2011, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/893,167, 9 pp. |
Santa Cruz et al., “An Analytical Study of JPEG 2000 Functionalities” / “JPEG 2000 Still Image Coding Versus Other Standards,” Proc. SPIE vol. 4115, 10 pp. (2000). |
Taubman et al., “JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice,” pp. 110-113 and 348-353 (2002). |
Taubman et al., “Embedded Block Coding in JPEG2000,” 4 pp. (2000). |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2019, from U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,094, 8 pp. |
Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2019, from U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,094, 36 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180352238 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60488710 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10893168 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 12815029 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15068325 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16101173 | US | |
Parent | 12815029 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 15068325 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10623195 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10893168 | US |