This application claims the priority benefit of Italian Application for Patent No. 102022000020607, filed on Oct. 6, 2022, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the maximum extent allowable by law.
The description relates to power management integrated circuits (PMICs), such as a DC-DC converter apparatus comprising a time-based control loop, for instance.
One or more embodiments may be applied to, e.g., organic light-emitting diode (OLED), display panels.
Switching DC-DC converters are used in a variety of electronic systems. For instance, DC-DC converters can be used to provide a supply voltage level to an AMOLED display unit converting a battery-fed voltage level to a regulated (positive) output voltage level.
Various types of electronic converters are conventionally used, such as “buck” or “boost” converters, for instance. These types of converters are well known to the person skilled in the art, as evidenced, e.g., by the application note AN513/0393 “Topologies for Switched Mode Power Supplies”, L. Wuidart, 1999, STMicroelectronics (incorporated herein by reference).
DC-DC converters, such as boost-type converters, can be used in a variety of applications.
A conventional implementation of a converter circuit (currently referred to as “time-based”) comprises: a (voltage or current) controlled oscillator to perform integration in the phase domain; and delay lines providing a proportional/derivative action.
Depending on the application, in order to provide adequate efficiency and performance levels, a time-based DC-DC converter circuit should desirably work in different modes (e.g., Continuous-Conduction Mode (CCM), Discontinuous-Conduction Mode (DCM), asynchronous mode, synchronous mode, etc.) and be able to operate reliably in different scenarios.
In DC-DC converters using a switching pair or network of transistors driven by a Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) signal, time-based approaches use the occurrences of rising edges of binary signals as variables inside the control loop. The advantage of this approach, compared to the voltage-based one, is a lower area occupation and lower power consumption. The performance gap between the two approaches further increases as the reference frequency of the converter increases.
The time-based approach takes advantage of the natural technology shrinking of the CMOS process using digital signals instead of analog ones inside the control loop. Moreover, the fully integrated DC-DC converter exploit lower filter inductance and capacitance values.
In order to maintain the same output voltage ripples, the reference frequency of the converter must increase to tens of MHz. While this change does not introduce any issues in the time-based control loop sizing, it directly impacts the voltage-based one with an increase of the error-amplifier (EA) bandwidth (leading to increased power consumption). The validity of such approach has already been tested, for instance, in the frame of High-Frequency CMOS Buck-Converter.
Ideally, the time-based architecture can be used also in the control loop of the boost converter achieving the same advantages. However, due to its non-minimum phase nature, the maximum achievable bandwidth of the boost converter is often limited by the presence of a right-half-plane (RHP) zero at 1/τz that is inherently present in the control to output transfer function.
A (transfer) function Tcontrol-to-out(s) representing a control loop for a boost converter can be written as:
Where: τLHPz is the left half plane zero, corresponding to a zero of a parasitic element of a capacitive element; τRHPz is the right-half-plane zero; Vin indicates the input voltage signal; D indicates the duty-cycle; Q indicates the filter quality factor; and
is the filter natural frequency.
The term τRHPz at the numerator is a right-half-plane (RHP) zero 1/τz whose value depends on the inductance L, load Rload and duty cycle D of the converter, as indicated herebelow:
The equation (2) also indicates that the value of the time constant τz of such a zero is larger as the load of the converter increases. Such an additional term is present solely when the converter works in PWM mode.
The maximum bandwidth of the system satisfies two inequalities, which may be expressed as:
where BWmax indicates a maximum achievable bandwidth, and fsw indicates a PWM switching frequency. In an LED display application, the current capability required is such that the first term is always limiting with respect to the second one. Considering a standard PID compensation network, with transfer function:
where τzl and τzh indicate time constants of two zeroes, τp1 and τp2 indicate time constants of the high frequency poles and KPID indicates a PID DC gain. In order to fulfill the requirement in equation (3a), the design of the PID network would involve high values of the time constants τzh and τzl of the zeroes.
In order to exploit the full advantages of the time-based implementation, overcoming the bandwidth limitation introduced by the RHP zero in equation (3a) has some relevance.
The right-half-plane (RHP) zero present in the transfer function of an open-loop control-to-output of (e.g., non-minimum phase) DC-DC converters leads to limiting the bandwidth of such devices.
For instance, in the known non-minimum phase converters, the bandwidth of the control system is kept below the RHP zero in order to keep the loop stable for every working condition.
A list of documents discussing existing approaches comprises, for instance:
Each of the foregoing documents is incorporated herein by reference.
Existing approaches suffer from one or more of the following drawbacks: increased area footprint due to dedicated pads and external components, and higher power consumption due to the presence of extra components (load sensor, inductor current sensor).
There is accordingly a need in the art to contribute in advancing one or more aspects.
One or more embodiments comprise a converter apparatus.
A boost DC-DC converter apparatus may be exemplary of such a converter apparatus.
One or more embodiments facilitate extending the loop bandwidth, e.g., improving the speed of the control system.
For instance, the controller can be reduced to a relatively simple proportional-integral (briefly, PI) controller.
For instance, the possibility to dispense from using additional sensors facilitates reducing system complexity.
In one or more embodiments, the reduction of system complexity facilitates reducing the area footprint and the power/current consumption, leading to a better overall system efficiency.
One or more embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the annexed Figures, wherein:
In the ensuing description, one or more specific details are illustrated, aimed at providing an in-depth understanding of examples of embodiments of this description. The embodiments may be obtained without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc.
In other cases, known structures, materials, or operations are not illustrated or described in detail so that certain aspects of embodiments will not be obscured.
Reference to “an embodiment” or “one embodiment” in the framework of the present description is intended to indicate that a particular configuration, structure, or characteristic described in relation to the embodiment is comprised in at least one embodiment. Hence, phrases such as “in an embodiment” or “in one embodiment” that may be present in one or more points of the present description do not necessarily refer to one and the same embodiment.
Moreover, particular conformations, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any adequate way in one or more embodiments.
The references used herein are provided merely for convenience and hence do not define the extent of protection or the scope of the embodiments.
Corresponding numerals and symbols in the different figures generally refer to corresponding parts unless otherwise indicated.
The figures are drawn to clearly illustrate the relevant aspects of the embodiments and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The edges of features drawn in the figures do not necessarily indicate the termination of the extent of the feature.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
In other words, in this configuration, energy is first stored in the inductive element L during the ON time interval and then transferred to the output load ZL during the OFF time interval.
As exemplified in
When operated in CCM, for instance, the average inductor current iL is limited in slew rate by the available voltage during the duty-cycle change of the control signals DRV1, DRV2. In terms of control function (e.g., in the Laplace plane), this corresponds to the presence of a right-half-plane (RHP) zero, which introduces a 90° phase shift, thus limiting the maximum achievable control loop bandwidth.
As exemplified in
As a result of the presence of the filter circuit block 27, a transfer function Gdo,FF(s) between the PWM signal VPWM produced by the PWM circuit block 24 and the error signal ε can be expressed as:
where: ω0z is the angular frequency of the zero doublet, e.g., generated by the combination of the path comprising the PWM circuit block 24, the output gain block 26, and the filter circuit block 27; for instance, the angular frequency can be real or complex conjugate depending on the gain and cut-off frequency of the filter circuit block; Qz is the quality factor of the zero doublet; ω0 is the angular frequency, e.g., of the pole doublet of the reactive elements L, C of the converter circuit 10; Q is the quality factor of the LC filter in the converter 10; and ωFF is a cut-off frequency of filter circuit block 27.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As appreciable by a visual comparison of the magnitudes and phases of the transfer functions Gdo,FF(s), Gdo(s), the presence of the filter circuit block 27 facilitates compensating the right-hand-plane (RHZ) zero, as the transfer function Gdo,FF(s) has a trend that goes down with a reduced slope with respect to the transfer function without the filter circuit Gdo(s), as well as a phase boost of more than 90 degrees with respect to the transfer function without the filter circuit Gdo(s).
As a result of the presence of the filter circuit block 27, the output voltage VOUT can be expressed as:
V
REF
−V
C
·K
FF
=V
OUT
where: KFF is a gain introduced by the filter block 27 and VC is the control voltage.
Rearranging the terms in the above expression, the reference voltage VREF can be expressed as:
where: D is the duty cycle, and GPWM is the gain of the PWM circuit block.
Therefore, the relationship between the output voltage VOUT and the reference voltage VREF may depend on the offset factor D/GPWM.
For instance, the duty-cycle D can be estimated by the input/output voltage relationship, and may be expressed as:
Such an offset factor D/GPWM may be further controlled using an arrangement as exemplified in
As exemplified in
For instance, the arrangement 20B exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
where η is the efficiency of the DC-DC converter 10.
For instance, in case the integral path is slow enough (e.g., reaching a condition that satisfies the expression Gint<<BWloop), the difference preserves the frequency information without affecting the overall response of the system.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
The output of the two current-controlled-oscillators 222 and 224, that is the signal at the feedback frequency ⋅F and a signal at the reference frequency ωR, are fed respectively to the input of the respective Current-Controlled-Delay-Line 223 and 225.
The output of the current-controlled-delay-lines 223 and 225 is fed to a phase detector 24 which, through drivers 120, supplies the PWM driving signal DRV1, DRV2. The phase detector 24 is configured to generate a voltage waveform VPWM having a duty cycle that is proportional to a phase difference among the two signals provided by the CCDLs 223, 225.
For instance, the phase detector 24 may be embodied for instance simply by a SR (set-reset) latch with pulse generators at its inputs. The pulse generators generate narrow pulses on every positive edge transition of their inputs, resulting in SR flip-flop-like behavior for the phase detector 24. The duty-cycle of the pulse width modulated signal, VPWM, is set at every positive edge of the reference, or control, phase, ΦR, and reset at every positive edge of the feedback phase, ΦF. Consequently, the duty-cycle of the signal, e.g., VPWM waveform, is proportional to a phase difference among two square-waves.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
Delay lines having a programmable delay as a function of a voltage or current signal are well known in the art. For example, in this context documents U.S. Pat. No. 5,650,739 A or 7,696,799 B2 may be cited (both documents incorporated herein by reference).
As exemplified in
I
OC
=Gm
D
·[V
C
−V
in(Rin/Rref)]
where: VC
As exemplified in
τOC=IOC·GOC
As exemplified in
As shown in
For instance, based on the difference between the effective duty-cycle D and the estimated one τOC (detected via the coupling circuitry 25), the offset may be removed.
For instance, any residual offset that may be present in the output voltage VOUT is slowly canceled out by the intervention of the loop OCP which adjust the positive input voltage of the transconductance amplifier 500 to provide the current that sets the OC-CCDL 502 to match the effective duty-cycle D.
A solution as exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
I
ave
=D
eff
·I
REF
where: Deff is the effective duty-cycle of the PWM signal VPWM driving the DC-DC converter (e.g., taking into account also the circuit efficiency), and IREF is the reference current provided by the current generators 510, 511.
As appreciable to those of skill in the art, a chopper circuit is a kind of electronic switching circuit that converts a “fixed” DC input to a variable DC output voltage directly. In other words, a chopper is an electronic switch (e.g., Sc, Sd) that is used to interrupt one signal (e.g., the current IREF provided by a current generator 510, 511) under the control of another (e.g., the PWM signal VPWM).
As exemplified in
I
M11
=Gm
D·(VCint−VIN(RIN/RREF))
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
For instance, in order to obtain an adequate cancellation of the residual offset, current choppers 511, Sd and 512, Sc may have a same gain.
For instance, during transients, when the effective duty-cycle slowly changes cycle by cycle, the estimated value of the mirrored current is (e.g., instantaneously) changed by the intervention of the fast feedforward FFP from the supply voltage Vin.
For instance, one or more embodiments facilitate preserving frequency information in the difference between the effective duty-cycle and the estimated one, while removing the offset.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
ε=(DEFFI−DESTI)
For instance, in a static condition, the error signal ε=(DEFFI−DESTI) is a square wave with average value zero.
As exemplified herein, a boost DC-DC converter apparatus operating in a PWM mode comprises a DC-DC boost converter architecture comprising a boost inductor L arranged in series with a supply voltage generator VIN providing a supply voltage to said boost inductor and an output capacitor C coupled to an output node VOUT in parallel with an output load ZL, a switching network S1, S2 configured to selectively couple the output of the boost inductor to the output node under the control of a PWM driving signal VPWM. The boost DC-DC converter apparatus comprises: a control loop 22, 24, 26 coupled to the voltage output and providing said PWM driving signal at its output, said control loop configured to produce an error signal ε as a function of a difference between an output voltage and a reference voltage VREF and configured to provide said PWM driving signal based on said error signal; and a low pass filter circuit block 27 coupled to the control loop to receive the PWM signal therefrom, the low pass filter circuit block 27 configured to apply low-pass filtering to the PWM signal, providing at least one filtered signal to the control loop. The control loop comprises at least one adder node 51, 31 configured to receive the at least one filtered signal from the low pass filter circuit block and to add the filtered signal to the error signal, providing said PWM driving signal as a function of a sum of the filtered signal and of the error signal.
As exemplified herein, the control loop comprises a time-based control loop, comprising an integral control branch 221, 222, 224 and a proportional branch 220, 223, 225. The integral control branch 221, 222, 224 is configured to convert said error signal into an integral control current signal Ii, which is used to obtain a control signal of at least one current controlled oscillator 222, 224, supplying a first signal on which the switching frequency fsw of the PWM driving signal depends, in particular corresponds to, operating with a first phase ΦR depending on said integral control current signal. The proportional branch 220, 223, 225 is configured to convert said error signal into a proportional control current signal Ip which is used to obtain a control signal of at least one delay line 223, 225, receiving at its input said first signal operating with a first phase, configured to sum in said first signal ΦR, ΦF a second phase depending on said proportional control current signal to obtain at least one time signal ΦR, ΦF. The at least one time signal is supplied to a phase detector 24 configured to output a switching voltage VPWM which duty cycle D is a function of the phase of the at least one time signal, in its turn supplied to a driver circuit to control the generation of the driving PWM signal driving the switching network of said DC-DC boost converter architecture.
As exemplified herein, the low pass filter circuit block 27 comprises: an RC network RLPF, CLPF configured to apply low-pass filtering to the PWM signal; and at least one transconductance amplifier 270, 272 configured to apply transconductance amplification to the filtered PWM signal, providing at least one filtered current signal to the time-based control loop. The at least one adder node of the control loop is configured to add the at least one filtered current signal to the integral control current signal and to the proportional control current signal. The sum of the at least one filtered current signal and of the proportional control current signal is used to obtain the control signal of at least one delay line 223, 225. The sum of the at least one filtered current signal of the integral control current signal is used to obtain a control signal of at least one current controlled oscillator 222, 224.
As exemplified herein, the boost DC-DC converter comprises an offset compensation circuit block 50; 50A coupled to the low pass filter circuit block, the offset compensation circuit block configured to apply offset compensation processing to the PWM signal, providing an offset compensated PWM signal to the low pass filter circuit block.
As exemplified herein, the offset compensation circuit block comprises: a first resistive branch RIN coupled to the supply voltage; and a second resistive branch RREF coupled to a setpoint reference node via a set of switches SA, SB, the setpoint reference node configured to receive a setpoint reference voltage VREF. The first and second resistive branches are coupled at a common intermediate node P providing a voltage indicative of a voltage ratio of the supply voltage and the reference voltage. A transconductance amplifier 500 has a first input node coupled to the common intermediate node to receive the voltage ratio, a second input node coupled to a capacitive element CINT referred to ground, and an output node configured to provide a current proportional to the voltage ratio at its first input node, wherein the second input node of the transconductance amplifier is coupled to the filter circuit block and to a coupling circuit block comprising a phase-frequency detector and a charge-pump, PFDCP, circuit block 25. An offset calibration current controlled delay line, OC-CCDL, 502 is coupled to the output node of the transconductance amplifier.
As exemplified herein, the offset compensation circuit block 50A comprises: a first current generator 510 coupled to a first switch M10 via a first chopper switch Sc configured to be driven to be made conductive or non-conductive via the PWM signal provided by the phase detector; and a second current generator 511 coupled to a second switch M11 via a second chopper switch SD, the second chopper switch SD configured to be driven to be made conductive or non-conductive via the PWM signal provided by the phase detector (24). A third switch M12 is coupled to the output of the transconductance amplifier and to the second switch. The first 510 and the second 511 current generators are configured to provide a reference current IREF, with the second switch and the second chopper switch having a common intermediate node coupled to the filter circuit block.
As exemplified herein: the low pass filter circuit block has a cut-off angular frequency ωFF, and a transfer function Gdo,FF(S) between said PWM driving signal and the error signal produced as a function of a difference between the output voltage VOUT and the reference voltage VREF is expressed as:
where: ω0z is an angular frequency, of the zero doublet generated by the combination of the two path Gdo(s) and FF(s); Qz is the quality factor, of the zero doublet; ω0 is an angular frequency of the pole doublet of the LC filter of the boost DC-DC converter apparatus; Q is a quality factor of the pole doublet of the LC filter of the boost DC-DC converter apparatus; and ωFF is the angular frequency of the filter circuit block (27).
It will be otherwise understood that the various individual implementing options exemplified throughout the figures accompanying this description are not necessarily intended to be adopted in the same combinations exemplified in the figures. One or more embodiments may thus adopt these (otherwise non-mandatory) options individually and/or in different combinations with respect to the combination exemplified in the accompanying figures.
The claims are an integral part of the technical teaching provided herein with reference to the embodiments.
Without prejudice to the underlying principles, the details and embodiments may vary, even significantly, with respect to what has been described by way of example only, without departing from the extent of protection. The extent of protection is defined by the annexed claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102022000020607 | Oct 2022 | IT | national |