This invention relates to methods and apparatus involving grid- or electrical power network-tied photovoltaic (PV) converters. In one embodiment, it especially relates to multiple panel grid-tied PV converters commonly deployed in either commercial or even residential power installations.
Many common PV converters may have challenges to meet cost and reliability challenges. Such challenges need to be viewed from the perspective of generating their electricity savings for payback of initial investment over longer periods. The present invention provides systems that may in some embodiments address cost and reliability goals for many PV systems.
At the current time the use of PV (photovoltaic) panels to generate electricity may be in a period of rapid growth. The cost of solar power may even be decreasing and many factors appear to limit the growth of non-renewable energy sources. Today there are both large scale systems and small scale systems being deployed. In a typical system, many PV panels may be connected to a grid-tied converter or inverter which may take the power from the PV panels, perhaps at or near their maximum power points, and may then transforms it to AC power suitable to back-feeding the grid or other electrical power network.
This invention solves one fundamental disadvantage of string converters when compared to module level converters. In solar PV installations there are various architectures which address the need for allowing solar PV modules to operate at their Maximum Power Point (MPP). Conventional central inverters 1 operate with their input voltage controlled to find the MPP of an array. This array typically has several (to hundreds or thousands) of strings 2 of individual solar modules 3. But every module has an individual MPP and an array MPP solution leaves energy unharvested. At the other end of the spectrum MPP per module converters allow maximum harvesting from each module. There is a middle ground being considered today whereby each string is equipped with a DC/DC converter operating at the MPP for a series string of PV modules 5.
For certain modules (e.g., thin film modules), the ratio of VOC cold to VMPP hot may be 2:1. Take for example a module having VOC cold=70 volts and hot=35 volts. In this installation the rail voltage on a cold day when the inverter is not connected to the grid will be 70×8=560 volts. This is safely below the US regulatory limit of 600 volts. A conventional string converter could simply be connected to this string. Obviously it would not meet the same regulatory limit with a conventional system if more modules were added to this string.
The normal operating voltage of this string though may be only 35×8=280 volts. This low operating voltage requires a large wire plus the inverter must operate at 280 volts while being able to withstand 560 volts. The circuit of an embodiment of this invention capitalizes on the situation where thin film solar PV modules typically operate with VMPP of, less than, and perhaps only about half of, VOC cold.
One advantage is that string MPP architectures gain much of the energy of individual module MPP architectures while costing a bit less. There are a few limitations of string MPP architectures:
A novel string DC/DC converter with MPP can be used to solve the third limitation while adding several new benefits. Solving this modules-per-string problem allows a solar PV system designer to place more modules per string (perhaps 2× more), resulting in fewer strings and fewer combiner boxes. The final result can be a lowering of Balance Of System (BOS) cost. As will be seen the architecture disclosed also allows a DC/DC converter to operate at its sweet spot improving efficiency. Another aspect of this invention is the suitability of this architecture for thin film photovoltaic modules in that it can address the low fill factor of thin film technologies with a low cost, highly efficient design.
One advantage of the inventive technology may be, in embodiments, the ability to place more modules on a string, thereby lowering the total number of strings that a solar array must have to generate a design power. Such reduction of the total number of strings translates into a cost savings, as strings often require expensive componentry (e.g., combiner boxes). In some embodiments, twice as many solar panels may be placed on a string, relative to conventional technologies.
Additional Exemplary Advantages: Because of the allowed regulatory upper limit voltage (recall that even during an open circuit, during sunlight hours, where no power is output from the DC-AC inverter, there is a voltage output), and because of the fact that typically, an open circuit voltage from a solar panel is greater than a loaded (e.g., operating circuit) voltage from that solar panel (because MPP controls effective during loaded circuit conditions reduce output voltages as compared with open circuit conditions, in order to achieve maximum power), the number of solar panels per string in certain prior art string architecture was limited by the open circuit condition (again, because it produces higher voltages and because compliance with applicable voltage regulations is mandatory), with the inventive technology, the number of modules per string can be increased. This may be due to the bucking of open circuit voltages (which are typically higher than operational voltages); in this way, relative to a conventional apparatus with a maximum number of panels in a string, during open circuit condition, more panels can be added without going over the limit. And during operation, the voltage sum of the loaded panels of a single string can be greater than it otherwise would be (which is beneficial because such means more power per string . . . and the associated cost savings). This may be due to the fact that in embodiments of the inventive technology, the converter, established intermediately within the string, is connected with two portions of the string in which it is established via conductors, and the loaded circuit (e.g., MPP) voltages of such conductors sum to be substantially equal to the output from the converter. Such “sweet spot” operation affords additional efficiency of operation benefits relative to conventional apparatus. As such, not only does the inventive technology, in particular embodiments, offer advantages relative to an increase in the number of modules per string, but it also offers benefits relative to the efficiency of operation (due to “sweet spot” operation). Open circuit voltages may be reduced, or bucked, by the converter, such that they sum to at or below the maximum regulatory voltage. Of course, additional advantages may be as disclosed elsewhere in this patent application.
As may be understood from the earlier discussions, the present invention includes a variety of aspects, which may be combined in different ways. The following descriptions are provided to list elements and describe some of the embodiments of the present invention. These elements are listed with initial embodiments, however it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments. The variously described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed to limit the present invention to only the explicitly described systems, techniques, and applications. Further, this description should be understood to support and encompass descriptions and claims of all the various embodiments, systems, techniques, methods, devices, and applications with any number of the disclosed elements, with each element alone, and also with any and all various permutations and combinations of all elements in this or any subsequent application
Consider first the architecture and circuit diagram of one embodiment of the invention shown in
During power generating periods (loaded circuit condition), when individual module outputs may drop to VMPP, (the series of eight modules making perhaps ˜280 volts) the DC/DC subconverter 55 may now pass the input voltage relatively unaltered to the output which may remain at 560 volts (conservatively below an upper maximum allowed by regulation of 600V). Importantly at this time when the DC/DC subconverters 55 are operating at significant power, they are also at their sweet spot—neither boosting nor bucking significantly and therefore operate at their highest efficiency!
The DC/DC subconverters 55 may be simply buck mode converters or may be many differing types of converters. This disclosure does not intend to limit aspects of the actual power converter or other element that may be used. For example, as shown conceptually in
As a result the circuit and architecture of embodiments of the invention may provide the following benefits:
The inventive technology, in embodiments, may adjust loaded condition power per string or even per substring (string portion 50) to achieve maximum power point for that string or substring, while bucking open circuit voltages. Indeed, in particular embodiments, the purpose of the converter may be, at least in part, to extract, perhaps using switches (e.g., perhaps one for each string or substring), maximum power from the string or substrings with which it is connected, while bucking open circuit voltages to provide for a greater number of panels for each string (or substring). While the converters disclosed herein may be, at times, presented in the context of solar array power generation, they may have other applications.
In particular embodiments of the inventive technology, a DC-DC converter 52 may be established intermediately within a string of solar panels (which includes but is not limited to directly in the center of). While in certain embodiments a converter so established may be established such that the number of solar panel(s) serially connected between the converter and the lower rail is the same as the number of panels serially connected between the converter and the upper rail, such a symmetric architecture is not a necessary feature.
Particular embodiments may involve operation of the converter at a “sweet spot”, where the sum of the voltages of conductors from string portions to the converter is substantially equal to (e.g., within 20% of) the voltage of the conductor leading to the upper (or positive) rail (voltages measured relative to a lower or negative rail; see
Relatedly, the inventive technology, in particular embodiments, may be viewed as power architecture that allows a substantially constant voltage applied to a positive rail during open circuit and loaded circuit conditions (i.e., where the open circuit voltage of the positive rail relative to the negative rail is substantially equal to the loaded circuit voltage of the positive rail relative to the negative rail), and/or that affords the efficiency benefits of sweet spot converter operation while perhaps also outputting a near maximum regulatory voltage (see, e.g.,
In particular embodiments, the intermediately connected DC-DC converter may include sub-converters 55. Where two sub-converters are present, a first string portion may be electrically connected with one sub-converter and a second string portion may be electrically connected with the other sub-converter. The subconverters may be connected with an intra-string connector 9. The converter, regardless of whether it includes sub-converters, may be a buck/boost converter (e.g., a dual mode conductor as described in PCT publication number WO2009051853 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,498). Indeed the sub-converters themselves may be “dual mode” type as these references describe.
In particular embodiments where an intermediately established converter divides a solar panel string into two portions, the two string portions may operate as if in parallel during an open circuit condition, and operate in as if in series during a closed (operating, e.g., MPP) circuit condition. Further, in particular embodiments, converter circuitry (e.g., switching circuitry), may be able to smoothly transition from series connected substrings (string portions) to parallelly connected substrings.
It should be understood that while the exemplary disclosure (e.g., in writing and/or figures) may appear to relate most particularly to unipolar designs, this application is intended to, and in fact does, also disclose bipolar designs (e.g., where the negative, or lower rail has a voltage of zero).
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be generally described as a solar power system that includes: at least two solar panels 56 of a first solar power string 60; a first DC-DC converter 52 connected within the first solar power string; a negative rail 64 electrically connected with one of the at least two solar panels and the first DC-DC converter; a positive rail 62 electrically connected with a different one of the at least two solar panels and the first DC-DC converter; and a DC-AC power inverter 63 that acts on power conducted by the negative and positive rails. Often, a rail receives a plurality of inputs from parallelly disposed components.
In particular embodiments the first DC-DC converter may operate at a sweet spot during loaded circuit condition of the system. More particularly, the first DC-DC converter connected within the first solar power string may be connected with a first portion 67 of the first solar power string through a first string portion conductor 68 and connected with a second portion 65 of the first solar power string through a second string portion conductor 66, where the second string portion conductor may have a second string portion loaded circuit voltage value (e.g., 600V, including slightly less than 600V) relative to the negative rail, the first string portion conductor may have a first string portion loaded circuit voltage value (e.g., 300V) relative to the negative rail, and a sum of the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value and the second string portion loaded circuit voltage value may be substantially equal to a loaded circuit voltage value 600V of the positive rail relative to the negative rail.
In particular embodiments, the system may further comprise a second solar power string 70 connected in parallel with the first solar power string; and a second DC-DC converter 71 connected may be established within the second solar power string. A diode 72 may be established between the positive rail and the converter.
The positive rail may have an open circuit voltage (e.g., 600V) relative to the negative rail and a loaded circuit voltage relative to the negative rail that are substantially equal. The positive rail may have a loaded circuit voltage relative to the negative rail that is conservatively close (such that expected variations in operating conditions will not cause an excessive voltage) to a regulatory maximum voltage limit (e.g., 560V).
In particular embodiments, the first DC-DC converter may include two sub-converters 55. At least one of the two sub-converters may be a dual mode converter; at least one of the two sub-converters may be a buck converter; and/or at least one of the two sub-converters may be a converter that is neither dual mode, buck, nor boost. Typically, a strictly boost converter would not be applicable, as there may be no need for boosting in converters of certain embodiments of the invention.
It is of note that in certain embodiments, the negative rail (where the rail can have either a negative or zero voltage value), is a lower rail, and the positive rail is an upper rail. Further, the power system can be unipolar or bipolar.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be generally described as a solar power system comprising a string of solar panels 60; a DC-DC converter 52 intermediately connected within the string as a part of the string; a positive rail 62 and a negative rail 64 with which each the string and the DC-DC converter is connected; and at least one DC-AC power inverter 63 that acts on DC power conducted by the positive and negative rails.
In particular embodiments, the first DC-DC converter may operate at a sweet spot during loaded circuit condition of the system. More particularly, the first DC-DC converter connected within the string may be connected with a first portion of the string through a first string portion conductor and connected with a second portion of the string through a second string portion conductor, where the first string portion conductor has a first string portion loaded circuit voltage value relative to the negative rail, the second string portion conductor has a second string portion loaded circuit voltage value relative to the negative rail, and a sum of the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value and the second string portion loaded circuit voltage value is substantially equal to a loaded circuit voltage value of the positive rail relative to the negative rail.
The string may be a first string, and the system may further comprise at least one additional string 70 of solar panels connected in parallel with the first string. The system may further comprise at least one additional DC-DC converter 71, each of which may be connected within one of the at least one additional string of solar panels.
A diode may be established between the DC-DC converter and the positive rail 62. The positive rail may have an open circuit voltage relative to the negative rail 64 and a loaded circuit voltage relative to the negative rail that are substantially equal; further, or instead, the positive rail may have a loaded circuit voltage relative to the negative rail that is equal to or slightly less than a regulatory voltage limit (e.g., a federally imposed limit of 600 V).
In particular embodiments, the DC-DC converter may comprise two sub-converters (e.g., at least one of which is a dual mode converter (see WO2009/051853, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,498), at least one of which is a buck converter, and/or at least one of which is neither a dual mode nor buck converter. In particular embodiments, the system may be unipolar or bipolar. Further, the positive rail may be an upper rail and the negative rail may be a lower rail.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power system comprising a string 60 of solar panels; a DC-DC converter 52 established intermediately within the first string of solar panels, the converter dividing the string into a first portion 67 and a second portion 65, the first portion connected with the DC-DC converter through a first string portion conductor 68 and the second portion connected with the DC-DC converter through a second string portion conductor 66; a negative rail 64 connected with the second string portion and the DC-DC converter; a positive rail 62 connected with the first string portion and the DC-DC converter, and a converter conductor 80 traveling from the converter towards the positive rail 62. In certain embodiments: a loaded circuit voltage of the first string portion conductor relative to a voltage of the negative rail has a first string portion loaded circuit voltage value; a loaded circuit voltage of the second string portion conductor relative to a voltage of the negative rail has a second string portion loaded circuit voltage value; a loaded circuit voltage of the positive rail relative to the negative rail has a positive rail loaded circuit voltage value; an open circuit voltage of the positive rail relative to the negative rail has a positive rail open circuit voltage value; a loaded circuit voltage of the converter conductor relative to the negative rail has a converter conductor loaded circuit voltage value; and a sum of the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value and the second string portion loaded circuit voltage value is substantially equal to the converter conductor loaded circuit voltage value. Such may be sweet spot operation, and operating to achieve such condition is sweet spot operating.
The positive rail loaded circuit voltage value may be substantially equal to the positive rail open circuit voltage value, and/or a sum of the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value and the second string portion loaded circuit voltage value is substantially equal to the positive rail loaded circuit voltage value. This condition may be seen during sweet spot operation.
An open circuit voltage of the first string portion conductor relative to the negative rail may have a first string portion open circuit voltage value, an open circuit voltage of the second string portion conductor relative to the negative rail may have a second string portion open circuit voltage value, and an open circuit voltage of the converter conductor relative to the negative rail may have a converter conductor open circuit voltage value. In certain embodiments, a sum of the first string portion open circuit voltage value and the second string portion open circuit voltage value is substantially equal to the converter conductor open circuit voltage value. In certain embodiments, a sum of the first string portion open circuit voltage value and the second string portion open circuit voltage value is substantially equal to the converter conductor loaded circuit voltage value. In particular embodiments, a sum of the first string portion open circuit voltage value and the second string portion open circuit voltage value is less than or equal to a regulatory maximum voltage limit. Relationships between open circuit voltages as described herein may be the result of bucking of voltages by the converter (or sub-converters that may be established therein).
In particular embodiments, the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value is equal to the second string portion loaded circuit voltage. An open circuit voltage of the positive rail relative to the negative rail may be said to be a positive rail open circuit voltage value, and the positive side of the second string portion open circuit voltage value may be substantially equal to the positive rail open circuit voltage value. The negative side of the first string portion open circuit voltage value may be, in certain embodiments, substantially equal to zero. A sum of the first string portion loaded circuit voltage value and the second string portion loaded circuit voltage value is substantially equal to the positive rail open circuit voltage value. The positive rail open circuit voltage value may be substantially equal to the positive rail loaded circuit voltage value.
In certain embodiments, the converter conductor is a converter output conductor, and the converter conductor loaded circuit voltage value is conservatively less than a regulatory maximum voltage limit. Further, the converter may include two sub-converters, at least one of which is a dual mode converter; at least one of which may include a buck converter; and at least one of which is neither dual mode, buck, nor boost. Additionally, the negative rail may be a lower rail, and the positive rail may be an upper rail. As with other designs, the power system is unipolar or bipolar.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power control method comprising the steps of generating power from at least two solar panel substrings of a solar power string that is connected to negative and positive rails; maximum power point controlling, with a maximum power point controller, a voltage output by each the at least two solar panel substrings; and converting a power at maximum power point to AC. The step of maximum power point controlling may comprise the step of controlling with a maximum power point controller having at least two switches. Such switches may provide shunting functionality. The step of maximum power point controlling, with a maximum power point controller, a voltage output by each the at least two solar panel substrings may comprise the step of maximum power point controlling, with DC-DC converter.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power control method comprising the steps of generating power from two solar panel substrings of a solar panel string that is connected to negative and positive rails; and mirror image controlling the power from two solar panel substrings of a converter established within the solar power string. Mirror image controlling may involve symmetric identical control where inputs are equal. The step of mirror image controlling the power from the two solar panel substrings may comprise the step of maximum power point controlling. It may involve the step of controlling with two sub-converters that each comprise a switch; such sub-converters may be substantially identical, but perhaps oriented in mirror image fashion, perhaps with any diodes changed from a strict mirror image so as to enable proper functionality as intended.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology is a solar power control method comprising the steps of: bucking open circuit voltage from each of a plurality of solar panel substrings of a solar panel string of a solar power system, with a converter during open circuit condition; and sweet spot processing loaded circuit voltage from each of the plurality of solar panel substrings during loaded circuit condition. The method may further comprise the step of pulling maximum power point power from the each of the plurality of solar panel substrings during loaded circuit condition. A sum of voltages associated with the maximum power point power of each of the plurality of solar panel substrings may be less than or equal to a maximum regulatory voltage. The step of bucking open circuit voltage from each of a plurality of solar panel substrings may comprise the step of bucking so that a sum of bucked voltages is less than or equal to a maximum regulatory voltage; the step of bucking open circuit voltage from each of a plurality of solar panel substrings comprises the step of bucking open circuit voltage to approximately one-half voltage input to the converter by each of the substrings.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power control system comprising: at least two solar panel substrings of a solar panel string of a solar power system; a controller established so as to maintain an open circuit voltage from the controller during an open circuit condition of the solar power system that is substantially equal to a loaded circuit voltage from the controller during a loaded circuit condition of the solar power system. In certain embodiments, an average of the open circuit voltage and the loaded circuit voltage is substantially equal to a maximum regulatory voltage.
At least one additional embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power control method comprising the steps of: loaded circuit, high efficiency, high power delivering of power generated by a solar panel string; and converting the delivered power to AC. The step of loaded circuit, high efficiency, high power delivering of power generated by a solar panel string comprises the step of loaded circuit, high efficiency, high power delivering of power generated by at least two solar panel substrings of the solar panel string. The step of loaded circuit, high efficiency, high power delivering of power generated by a solar panel string may comprise the step of neither bucking nor boosting (or simply not comprise the step of bucking or boosting, or comprise the step of refraining from bucking or boosting). The step of loaded circuit, high efficiency, high power delivering of power comprises the step of delivering maximum power point power.
It is of note that during “sweet spot” operation, where a converter has sub-converters, the inputs to and the outputs from each of the sub-converters is also substantially the same.
At least one embodiment of the inventive technology may be described as a solar power string control method, comprising the steps of generating power with solar panels of at least two substrings of a solar power string; managing circuit functionality with a DC-DC converter established intermediately of said string, said power controller defining said substrings (e.g., by dividing a larger string connected between rails into two substrings). The step of managing circuit functionality may comprise the steps of bucking open circuit voltages generated by said substrings, and, perhaps also the step of sweet spot operating during loaded circuit condition. Such converter may also achieve MPP control (e.g., with switches of said converter).
While novel converters disclosed herein may be, at times, presented in the context of solar array power generation, they may have other applications.
As shown in
In particular embodiments, the system may further comprise a first power generator 198 electrically connected with the first inductor. The first power generator may be a first solar panel substring; current from the first solar panel substring may flow away from the first node. The first power generator may be electrically connected with the high voltage conductor. The system may further comprise a second power generator 199 electrically connected with the second inductor; the second power generator may be a second solar panel substring. Current from the second solar panel substring may flow towards the second node. Further, the second power generator may be electrically connected with the low voltage conductor. The system may further comprise at least one additional parallelly connected converter 200 and additional power generators 201 associated with (e.g., connected with) each of the at least one additional parallelly connected converter. In certain embodiments, the higher voltage conductor connects to a positive rail 62, and the first power generator is connected with the positive rail. In certain embodiments, the lower voltage conductor connects to a negative rail 64 and the second power generator is connected with the negative rail. Further, the DC-DC converter may be established within a solar panel string, the DC-DC converter may be part of a unipolar power generation system; and/or the DC-DC converter may be part of a bipolar power generation system.
As shown in
In certain embodiments, the system may include a first power generator 198 connected to the first power generator connector; current may flow from the first power generator away from the DC-DC converter. The system may further comprise a second power generator 199 connected to the second power generator connector; current may from the second power generator towards the DC-DC converter. The system may further comprise at least one additional parallelly connected converter 200 and at least two additional power generators 201 connected with each of the at least one additional parallelly connected converter. The converter may be part of a unipolar power generation system or a bipolar power generation system. In certain embodiments, the higher voltage conductor connects to a positive rail 62, as may be the first power generator. The lower voltage conductor may connect to a negative rail 64, as may be second power generator.
As shown in
In the various descriptions provided herein, the following may apply: conductor can be one or more than one wire (it may be whatever conducts). Substantially equal may mean within less than or equal to 20%, 17.5%. 15%. 12.5%. 10%. 7.5%, 5%, or 2.5%. Two components or conductors may be electrically connected even if they are intervening (typically non-converting) devices. Diodes may be optional; indeed some capacitors, particularly in the figures of the various inventive converters, may not even be shown. The term negative rail applies where there is a rail type conductor that is either at negative (e.g., the negative of the positive voltage of the positive rail) or zero volts (negative voltage may be found, e.g., in the case of a bipolar design). It is of note that the inventive converters need not necessarily have power generation connectors as claimed or described, or power generators attached thereto as claimed or described.
As can be easily understood from the foregoing, the basic concepts of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of ways. It involves both control techniques as well as devices to accomplish the appropriate controlling. In this application, the control techniques are disclosed as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various devices described and as steps which are inherent to utilization. They are simply the natural result of utilizing the devices as intended and described. In addition, while some devices are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only accomplish certain methods but also can be varied in a number of ways. Importantly, as to all of the foregoing, all of these facets should be understood to be encompassed by this disclosure.
The discussion included in this application is intended to serve as a basic description. The reader should be aware that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe all embodiments possible; many alternatives are implicit. It also may not fully explain the generic nature of the invention and may not explicitly show how each feature or element can actually be representative of a broader function or of a great variety of alternative or equivalent elements. Again, these are implicitly included in this disclosure. Where the invention is described in device-oriented terminology, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. Apparatus claims may not only be included for the device described, but also method or process claims may be included to address the functions the invention and each element performs. Neither the description nor the terminology is intended to limit the scope of the claims that will be included in any subsequent patent application.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this invention. A broad disclosure encompassing both the explicit embodiment(s) shown, the great variety of implicit alternative embodiments, and the broad methods or processes and the like are encompassed by this disclosure and may be relied upon when drafting the claims for any subsequent patent application. It should be understood that such language changes and broader or more detailed claiming may be accomplished at a later date (such as by any required deadline) or in the event the applicant subsequently seeks a patent filing based on this filing. With this understanding, the reader should be aware that this disclosure is to be understood to support any subsequently filed patent application that may seek examination of as broad a base of claims as deemed within the applicant's right and may be designed to yield a patent covering numerous aspects of the invention both independently and as an overall system.
Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. Additionally, when used or implied, an element is to be understood as encompassing individual as well as plural structures that may or may not be physically connected. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these. Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same. Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled. As but one example, it should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates. Regarding this last aspect, as but one example, the disclosure of a “converter” should be understood to encompass disclosure of the act of “converting”—whether explicitly discussed or not—and, conversely, were there effectively disclosure of the act of “converting”, such a disclosure should be understood to encompass disclosure of a “converter” and even a “means for converting”. Such changes and alternative terms are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description.
Any acts of law, statutes, regulations, or rules mentioned in this application for patent; or patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent are hereby incorporated by reference. Any priority case(s) claimed by this application is hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference.
Thus, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim and make a statement of invention to at least: i) each of the solar power devices as herein disclosed and described, ii) the related methods disclosed and described, iii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these devices and methods, iv) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, v) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, vi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, vii) the applications enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed, viii) the resulting products produced by such systems or components, ix) each system, method, and element shown or described as now applied to any specific field or devices mentioned, x) methods and apparatuses substantially as described hereinbefore and with reference to any of the accompanying examples, xi) the various combinations and permutations of each of the elements disclosed, xii) each potentially dependent claim or concept as a dependency on each and every one of the independent claims or concepts presented, and xiii) all inventions described herein. In addition and as to computer aspects and each aspect amenable to programming or other electronic automation, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim and make a statement of invention to at least: xiv) processes performed with the aid of or on a computer as described throughout the above discussion, xv) a programmable apparatus as described throughout the above discussion, xvi) a computer readable memory encoded with data to direct a computer comprising means or elements which function as described throughout the above discussion, xvii) a computer configured as herein disclosed and described, xviii) individual or combined subroutines and programs as herein disclosed and described, xix) the related methods disclosed and described, xx) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these systems and methods, xxi) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, xxii) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, xxiii) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, and xxiv) the various combinations and permutations of each of the above.
It should be understood that if or when broader claims are presented, such may require that any relevant prior art that may have been considered at any prior time may need to be re-visited since it is possible that to the extent any amendments, claim language, or arguments presented in this or any subsequent application are considered as made to avoid such prior art, such reasons may be eliminated by later presented claims or the like. In drafting any claims at any time whether in this application or in any subsequent application, it should also be understood that the applicant has intended to capture as full and broad a scope of coverage as legally available. To the extent that insubstantial substitutes are made, to the extent that the applicant did not in fact draft any claim so as to literally encompass any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, the applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended to or actually relinquished such coverage as the applicant simply may not have been able to anticipate all eventualities; one skilled in the art, should not be reasonably expected to have drafted a claim that would have literally encompassed such alternative embodiments.
Further, if or when used, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps. Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive form so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible. As one clarifying example, if a claim were dependent “on claim 20 or any other claim” or the like, it could be re-drafted as dependent on claim 1, claim 15, or even claim 715 (if such were to exist) if desired and still fall with the disclosure. It should be understood that this phrase also provides support for any combination of elements in the claims and even incorporates any desired proper antecedent basis for certain claim combinations such as with combinations of method, apparatus, process, and the like claims.
This application, a US Non-Provisional patent application, is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/503,011, filed 19 Apr. 2012, which is the United States National Stage of international patent application number PCT/US2010/053253, filed 19 Oct. 2010, published on 28 Apr. 2011 as WO 2011/049985 A1 and which claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/253,025, filed Oct. 19, 2009, each application hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3900943 | Sirti et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4127797 | Perper | Nov 1978 | A |
4168124 | Pizzi | Sep 1979 | A |
4218139 | Sheffield | Aug 1980 | A |
4222665 | Tacjozawa et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4249958 | Baudin et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4274044 | Barre | Jun 1981 | A |
4341607 | Tison | Jul 1982 | A |
4375662 | Baker | Mar 1983 | A |
4390940 | Corbefin et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4395675 | Toumani | Jul 1983 | A |
4404472 | Steigerwald | Sep 1983 | A |
4409537 | Harris | Oct 1983 | A |
4445030 | Carlson | Apr 1984 | A |
4445049 | Steigerwald | Apr 1984 | A |
4513167 | Brandstetter | Apr 1985 | A |
4528503 | Cole | Jul 1985 | A |
4580090 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4581716 | Kamiya | Apr 1986 | A |
4619863 | Taylor | Oct 1986 | A |
4616983 | Harada et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634943 | Reick | Jan 1987 | A |
4649334 | Nakajima | Mar 1987 | A |
4725740 | Nakata | Feb 1988 | A |
4749982 | Rikuna et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4794909 | Elden | Jan 1989 | A |
4873480 | Lafferty | Oct 1989 | A |
4896034 | Kiriseko | Jan 1990 | A |
4899269 | Rouzies | Feb 1990 | A |
4922396 | Niggemeyer | May 1990 | A |
5027051 | Lafferty | Jun 1991 | A |
5028861 | Pace et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5144222 | Herbert | Sep 1992 | A |
5179508 | Lange et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5270636 | Lafferty | Dec 1993 | A |
5401561 | Fisun et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402060 | Erisman | Mar 1995 | A |
5493155 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493204 | Caldwell | Feb 1996 | A |
5503260 | Riley | Apr 1996 | A |
5646502 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
5648731 | Decker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659465 | Flack et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669987 | Takehara et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689242 | Sims et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5741370 | Hanoka | Apr 1998 | A |
5747967 | Muljadi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5782994 | Mori et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5896281 | Bingley | Apr 1999 | A |
5898585 | Sirichote et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923100 | Lukens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932994 | Jo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6046401 | McCabe | Apr 2000 | A |
6081104 | Kern | Jun 2000 | A |
6124769 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162986 | Shiotsuka | Dec 2000 | A |
6180868 | Yoshino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181590 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191501 | Bos | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218605 | Daily et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218820 | D'Arrigo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219623 | Wills | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6262558 | Weinberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278052 | Takehara et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281485 | Siri | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282104 | Kern | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6314007 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6331670 | Takehara et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6351400 | Lumsden | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369462 | Siri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6433522 | Siri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433992 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6441896 | Field | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448489 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6493246 | Suzui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515215 | Mimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545211 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6593521 | Kobayashi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6545868 | Kledzik et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624350 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6670721 | Lof et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686533 | Raum et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6686727 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696823 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703555 | Takabayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6750391 | Bower et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791024 | Toyomura | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804127 | Zhou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6889122 | Perez | May 2005 | B2 |
6914418 | Sung | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914420 | Crocker et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920055 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6952355 | Rissio et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958922 | Kazem | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6984965 | Vinciarelli | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7019988 | Fung et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068017 | Willner et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072194 | Nayar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091707 | Cutler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092265 | Kernahan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7158395 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193872 | Siri | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7227278 | Realmuto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248946 | Bashaw et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7333916 | Warfield et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339287 | Jepsen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7365661 | Thomas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7471073 | Rettenwort et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479774 | Wai et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7514900 | Sander et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7596008 | Iwata | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D602432 | Moussa | Oct 2009 | S |
7602080 | Hadar et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7605498 | Ledenev et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619200 | Seymour et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7619323 | Tan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7663342 | Kimball et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719140 | Ledenev et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7768155 | Fornage | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786716 | Simburger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807919 | Powell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834580 | Haines | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843085 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7919953 | Porter et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948221 | Watanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962249 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8004116 | Ledenev et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013472 | Adest et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8018748 | Leonard | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8058747 | Avrutsky et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093756 | Porter et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106765 | Ackerson et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8242634 | Schatz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264195 | Takehara et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273979 | Weir | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8304932 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314375 | Arditi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8461811 | Porter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473250 | Adest | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482153 | Ledenev et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8531055 | Adest et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8593103 | Takehara et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8816535 | Adest et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8854193 | Makhota et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8860241 | Hadar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9042145 | Schill | May 2015 | B2 |
9112379 | Sella et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9366714 | Ledenev et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9397497 | Ledenev | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9438037 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9442504 | Porter et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9466737 | Ledenev | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9673630 | Ledenev et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20010007522 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010032664 | Takehara et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020038200 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020195136 | Takabayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030062078 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075211 | Makita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030117822 | Stamenic et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030218449 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040095020 | Kemahan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100149 | Lai | May 2004 | A1 |
20040135560 | Kernahan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159102 | Toyomura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164557 | West | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040207366 | Sung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211456 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050002214 | Deng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050068012 | Cutler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105224 | Nishi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109386 | Marshall | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116475 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121067 | Toyomura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162018 | Realmuto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169018 | Hatai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254191 | Bashaw et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017327 | Siri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060103360 | Cutler | May 2006 | A9 |
20060162772 | Preser et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171182 | Siri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174939 | Matan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070024257 | Boldo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035975 | Dickerson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044837 | Simburger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069520 | Schetters | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070111103 | Konishiike et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119718 | Gibson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159866 | Siri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165347 | Wendt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171680 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070236187 | Wai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080036440 | Garmer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080238195 | Shaver | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062724 | Feng et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097655 | Hadar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101101 | Iwata et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111517 | Pfeifer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123375 | Beardsley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136367 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143188 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144294 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147335 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150366 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164766 | Adest et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186004 | Williams | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080236648 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247201 | Perol | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257397 | Glaser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020151 | Fornage | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039852 | Fishelov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090078300 | Ang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097655 | Hadar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114263 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120485 | Kikinis | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133736 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140715 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090141522 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145480 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146505 | Powell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146667 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146671 | Gazit | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147554 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150005 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160258 | Allen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206666 | Sella et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207543 | Boniface et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218887 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234692 | Powell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237042 | Glovinski | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237043 | Glovinski | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273241 | Gazit et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283128 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283129 | Foss | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284078 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284232 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284240 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284998 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100026097 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100027297 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038968 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078057 | Karg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085670 | Palaniswami et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089431 | Weir | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117858 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118985 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127570 | Hadar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127571 | Hadar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132758 | Gilmore | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139732 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139734 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139743 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100001587 | Casey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195361 | Stem | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229915 | Ledenev | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246230 | Porter | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253150 | Porter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308662 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327659 | Lisi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005567 | VanderSluis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110067745 | Ledenev et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095613 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115300 | Chiang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127841 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160930 | Batten et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175454 | Williams et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181251 | Porter et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193515 | Wu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210611 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110316346 | Porter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003251 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043818 | Stratakos et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120104864 | Porter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120175963 | Adest et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223584 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130271096 | Inagaki | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140045325 | Ledenev et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150100257 | Adest et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150130284 | Ledenev et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160156384 | Fabre et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160226257 | Porter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160268809 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160329720 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160336899 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160365734 | Ledenev | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380436 | Porter et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170271879 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170373503 | Ledenev et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180048161 | Porter et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2702392 | Sep 2015 | CA |
2737134 | Oct 2017 | CA |
1470098 | Jan 2004 | CN |
101904015 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102013853 | Apr 2011 | CN |
0178446 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0383971 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0677749 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0677749 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0824273 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0964415 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0964457 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0964457 | Dec 1999 | EP |
00978884 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0780750 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1291997 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1120895 | May 2004 | EP |
2017948 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2515424 | Apr 2012 | EP |
3176933 | Jun 2017 | EP |
3324505 | May 2018 | EP |
612859 | May 1943 | FR |
612859 | Nov 1948 | FR |
310362 | Sep 1929 | GB |
1231961 | Sep 1969 | GB |
424556.9 | Nov 2005 | GB |
5050197 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2415841 | Jan 2006 | GB |
2419968 | May 2006 | GB |
2421847 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2434490 | Jul 2007 | GB |
56042365 | Apr 1981 | JP |
60027964 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60148172 | Aug 1985 | JP |
62-256156 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62154121 | Sep 1987 | JP |
05003678 | Jan 1993 | JP |
06035555 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06141261 | May 1994 | JP |
07026849 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07222436 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07302130 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08033347 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8046231 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08066050 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-179840 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08181343 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08204220 | Aug 1996 | JP |
09097918 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9148613 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2000020150 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000174307 | Jun 2000 | JP |
20011086765 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002231578 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002231578 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006020390 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005235082 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007104872 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007225625 | Jun 2007 | JP |
27058845 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007058843 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-325371 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2011-193548 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012-60714 | Mar 2012 | JP |
1020050071689 | Jul 2005 | KR |
1020060060825 | Jul 2006 | KR |
1020070036528 | Mar 2007 | KR |
1020080092747 | Oct 2008 | KR |
201037958 | Oct 2010 | TW |
9003680 | Apr 1990 | WO |
9003680 | Apr 1990 | WO |
2011049985 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0217469 | Feb 2002 | WO |
20020073785 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2003036688 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03036688 | May 2003 | WO |
03036688 | May 2003 | WO |
2004100344 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004100348 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004107543 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2004107543 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005027300 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005036725 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005076445 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006005125 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006013600 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006013600 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006048688 | May 2006 | WO |
2006048689 | May 2006 | WO |
2006048689 | May 2006 | WO |
2006071436 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078685 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006117551 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006137948 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007007360 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007008429 | Jan 2007 | WO |
200708429 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007080429 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007142693 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007142693 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008125915 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008125915 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008132551 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008132551 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008132553 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008069926 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009003680 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
200955474 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051853 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051854 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051870 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009059028 | May 2009 | WO |
2009059028 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064683 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064683 | May 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072077 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073867 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073868 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009075985 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009075985 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009114341 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009114341 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140536 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140536 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140543 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140543 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140551 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140551 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010002960 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010014116 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010062410 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010062662 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010062662 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010065043 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010120315 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011110933 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012024538 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012024540 | Feb 2012 | WO |
20120100263 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2014143021 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application Publication No. 2008/125915A3, published Oct. 23, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2008/132551A3, published Nov. 6, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 7 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2008/142480A3, published Nov. 27, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/385,032, filed Sep. 8, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/262,916, filed Sep. 12, 2016. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. |
International Application filed Apr. 15, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/60345; First Named Inventor: Porter. 87 pages. |
International Application filed Jul. 18, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/70506; First Named Inventor: Schatz. 137 pages. |
International Application filed Mar. 14, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/57105; 90 pages. |
International Application filed Oct. 10, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/79605; 46 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2008; 42 pages. |
Román, E., et al. Experimental results of controlled PV module for building integrated PV systems; Science Direct; Solar Energy, vol. 82, Issue 5, May 2008, pp. 471-480. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506 corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 25, 2010; 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/252,998, filed Oct. 19, 2009, entitled Solar Module Circuit with Staggered Diode Arrangement; First Named Inventor: Ledenev; 55 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Nonfinal Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010; First Named Inventor: Porter; 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010; dated Oct. 26, 2010; 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010; 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Nonfinal Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2010; 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2010; 12 pages. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011; 2 pages. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011; 4 pages. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 4, 2011; 3 pages. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2011; 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2011; 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,704; Nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2011; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Final Office Action dated May 13, 2011; 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/995,704; Notice of allowance dated Jul. 19, 2011; 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Notice of allowance dated Sep. 9, 2011; 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal office action dated Sep. 23, 2011; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Nonfinal office action dated Dec. 29, 2011; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Nonfinal office action dated Jan. 23, 2012; 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Notice of allowance dated Apr. 17, 2012; 9 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated May 8, 2012; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,492; Nonfinal office action dated May 16, 2012, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Final office action dated Jun. 13, 2012; 13 pages. |
CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Sep. 26, 2011; 6 pages. |
CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Jun. 11, 2012; 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2012; 5 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2012; 5 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 24, 2012; 16 pages. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Final office action dated Aug. 24, 2012; 16 pages. |
Related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012; 12 pages. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Final office action dated Sep. 27, 2012; 11 pages. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Final office action dated Sep. 27, 2012; 15 pages. |
Parallel SG Patent Application No. 201107477-0; written opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012; 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,574, filed Nov. 21, 2014. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2016; 12 pages. |
Miwa, et al. High Efficiency Power Factor Correction Using Interleaving Techniques. (c) 1992 Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 12 pages. |
Jung, et al. DC-Link Ripple Reduction of Series-connected Module Integrated Converter for Photovoltaic Systems. International Conference of Power Electronics—ECCE Asia May 30-Jun. 2, 2011. 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/503,011, filed Apr. 19, 2012. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2016; 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,102, filed Jul. 2, 2013. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 30, 2016.; 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,666, filed Sep. 2, 2011. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2016; 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,174, filed Jun. 13, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/094,803, filed Apr. 8, 2016. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
Japanese Application No. 2004-046358, published Sep. 2, 2005. Filed Feb. 23, 2004. First Named Inventor: Yoshitake Akira. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Application No. 06-318447, filed Dec. 21, 1994. First Named Inventor: Tanaka Kunio. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Edelmoser, K. H. et al.; High Efficiency DC-to-AC Power Inverter with Special DC Interface; Professional Paper, ISSN 0005-1144, Automatika 46 (2005) 3-4, 143-148. |
Esmaili, Gholamreza; Application of Advanced Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Sources and Hygrid Generating Systems, Ohio State University, Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2006, Dissertation. |
Jung, D; Soft Switching Boost Converter for Photovoltaic Power Generation System, 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC 2008). |
Joo, Hyuk Lee; “Soft Switching Multi-Phase Boost Converter for Photovoltaic System,” Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Sep. 1, 2008. EPE-PEMC 2008. 13th. |
Kuo, J.-L.; “Duty-based Control of Maximum Power Point Regulation for Power Converter in Solar Fan System with Battery Storage,” Proceedings of the Third IASTED Asian Conference, Apr. 2, 2007, Phuket, Thialand. |
Enslin, J.H.R.; “Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter;” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on vol. 44, Issue 6, Dec. 1997, pp. 769-773. |
Dehbonei, Hooman; Corp author(s): Curtin University of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; 2003; Description: xxi, 284 leaves; ill.; 31 cm. Dissertation: Thesis. Abstract. |
Duncan, Joseph, A Global Maximum Power Point Tracking DC-DC Converter, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dissertation; Jan. 20, 2005. |
Enrique, J.M.; Duran, E; Sidrach-de-Cadona, M; Andujar, JM; “Theoretical Assessment of the Maximum Power Point Tracking Efficiency of Photovoltaic Facilities with Different Converter Topologies;” Source: Solar Energy 81, No. 1 (2007); 31 (8 pages). |
Tse, K.K. et al. “A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for PV Panels;” Dept. of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong; Source: PESC Record—IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, v 4, 2001, p. 1970-1975, Jun. 17-21, 2001; Abstract. |
Mutoh, Nobuyoshi; A Photovoltaic Generation System Acquiring Efficiently the Electrical Energy Generated with Solar Rays,; Graduate School of Tokyo, Metropolitan Institute of Technology; Source: Series on Energy and Power Systems, Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Jun. 28-30, 2004; p. 97-103. Abstract. |
Rajan, Anita; “Maximum Power Point Tracker Optimized for Solar Powered Cars;” Society of Automotive Engineers, Transactions, v 99, n Sect 6, 1990, p. 1408-1420; Abstract. |
Mutoh, Nobuyoshi, “A Controlling Method for Charging Photovoltaic Generation Power Obtained by a MPPT Control Method to Series Connected Ultra-electric Double Layer Capacitors;” Intelligent Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Tokyo; 39th IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society); v 4, 2004, p. 2264-2271. Abstract. |
Ho, Billy M.T.; “An Integrated Inverter with Maximum Power Tracking for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong; Conference Proceedings, 19th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Feb. 22-26, 2004; p. 1559-1565. |
Esram, T., Chapman, P.L., “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques,” Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions, Vo. 22, No. 2, pp. 439-449, Jun. 2007. |
Nishida, Yasuyuki, “A Novel Type of Utility-interactive Inverter for Photovoltaic System,” Conference Proceedings, IPEMC 2004; 4th International Power and Electronics Conference, Aug. 14-16, 2004; Xian Jiaotong University Press, Xian, China; p. 1785-1790. Abstract. |
Anon Source; International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, Jul. 12-13, 2007; Iasi, Romania; Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electroncis Engineers Computer Society; Abstract. |
Case, M.J.; “Minimum Component Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracker,” Vector (Electrical Engineering), Jun. 1999; p. 4-8; Abstract. |
Xue, John, “PV Module Series String Balancing Converters,” Supervised by Geoffrey Walker, Nov. 6, 2002; University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering. |
Siri, K; “Study of System Instability in Current-mode Converter Power Systems Operating in Solar Array Voltage Regulation Mode,” Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Systems, Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA; Feb. 6-10, 2000 in New Orleans, LA, 15th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 228-234. Abstract. |
Reimann, T, Szeponik, S; Berger, G; Petzoldt, J; “A Novel Control Principle of Bi-directional DC-DC Power Conversion,” 28th Annual IEEE Power Electroncis Specialists Conference, St. Louis, MO Jun. 22-27, 1997; vol. 2 pp. 978-984. Abstract. |
Kaiwei, Yao, Mao, Ye; Ming, Xu; Lee, F.C.; “Tapped-inductor Buck Converter for High-step-down DC-DC Conversion,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 20, Issue 4, Jul. 2005; pp. 775-780; Abstract. |
Ertl, H; Kolar, J.W.; Zach, F.C.; “A Novel Multicell DC-AC Converter for Applications in Renewable Energy Systems;” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Oct. 2002; vol. 49, Issue 5, pp. 1048-1057; Abstract. |
Bascope, G.V.T.; Barbi, I; “Generation of a Family of Non-isolated DC-DC PWM Converters Using New Three-state Switching Cells;” 2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference in Galway, Ireland; vol. 2, pp. 858-863; Abstract. |
Duan, Rouo-Yong; Chang, Chao-Tsung; “A Novel High-efficiency Inverter for Stand-alone and Grid-connected Systems,” 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications in Singapore, Jun. 3-5, 2008; Article No. 4582577. Abstract. |
Cuadras, A; Ben Amor, N; Kanoun, O; “Smart Interfaces for Low Power Energy Harvesting Systems,” 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference May 12-15, 2008 in Victoria, BC Canada; pp. 78-82 and 12-15. Abstract. |
Quan, Li; Wolfs, P; “An Analysis of the ZVS Two-inductor Boost Converter Under Variable Frequency Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Central Queensland University, Rockhamton, Qld, AU; vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007; pp. 120-131. Abstract. |
Yuvarajan, S; Dachuan, Yu; Shanguang, Xu; “A Novel Power Converter for Photovoltaic Applications,” Journal of Power Sources, Sep. 3, 2004; vol. 135, No. 1-2, pp. 327-331; Abstract. |
Power Article, Aerospace Systems Lab, Washington University, St. Louis, MO; estimated at Sep. 2007. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, International Search Report dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Search Report dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, International Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
Chen, J., et al. Buck-Boost PWM Converters Having Two Independently Controlled Switches, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 2001, vol. 2, pp. 736-741. |
Walker, G. et al. PhotoVoltaic DC-DC Module Integrated Converter for Novel Cascaded and Bypass Grid Connection Topologies—Design and Optimisation, 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference / Jun. 18-22, 2006, Jeju, Korea. |
Chen, J., et al. A New Low-Stress Buck-Boost Converter for Universal-Input PFC Applications, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Feb. 2001. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506 corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 25, 2010. |
SM3320 Power Optimizer Specifications; SolarMagic Power Optimizer Apr. 2009. |
Feuermann, D. et al., Reversible low solar heat gain windows for energy savings. Solar Energy vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 169-175, 1998. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/60345. International Prelimianry Report on Patentability dated Aug. 30, 2010. |
TwentyNinety.com/en/about-us/, printed Aug. 17, 2010; 3 pages. |
National Semiconductor News Release—National semiconductor's SolarMagic Chipset Makes Solar Panels “Smarter” May 2009. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Final office action dated Aug. 24, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/US10/53253; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jan. 25, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Notice of allowance dated Apr. 17, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated May 8, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/0749,492; Nonfinal office action dated May 16, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Final office action dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Sep. 26, 2011. |
Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Jun. 11, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,492; Final office action dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
Parallel Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Final office action dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Nonfinal office action dated Jan. 23, 2012. |
Parallel SG Patent Application No. 201107477-0; written opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Nonfinal office action dated Dec. 29, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal office action dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Notice of allowance dated Sep. 9, 2011. |
Bascope, G.V.T.; Barbi, I; “Generation of a Family of Non-isolated DC-DC PWM Converters Using New Three-state Switching Cells;” 2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference in Galway, Ireland; vol. 2, Abstract. |
http://www.solarsentry.com; Protecting Your Solar Investment, 2005, Solar Sentry Corp. |
Nishida, Yasuyuki, “A Novel Type of Utility-interactive Inverter for Photovoltaic System,” Conference Proceedings, IPEMC 2004; 4th International Power and Electronics Conference, Aug. 14-16, 2004; Xian Jiaotong University Press, Xian, China; Abstract. |
Tse, K.K.et al. “A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for PV Panels;” Dept. of Electronic Engineering, City Univerisity of Hong Kong; Source: PESC Record—IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, v 4, 2001, p. 1970-1975, Jun. 17-21, 2001; Abstract. |
Japanese Application No. 2001086765 A, filed Aug. 9, 2000; abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Application No. 07058843 A, filed Oct. 8, 1993; anbstract only. 1 page. |
Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529991; office action dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529986; office action dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2013. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 3, 2013. |
Related CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2013. |
Related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated May 31, 2013. |
Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529986; office action dated Mar. 5, 2013. |
Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529991; office action dated Sep. 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,517, filed Nov. 3, 2011, First Named Inventor: Meir Adest. |
TwentyNinety.com/en/about-us/, printed Aug. 17, 2010; 2 pages. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2007058845; filed Jul. 20, 2006; abstract only. 1 page. |
Walker, G.R. et al; “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul. 2004, 10 pages. |
Matsuo, H et al; Novel Solar Cell Power Supply System using the Multiple-input DC-DC Converter; Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1998; INTELEC, 20th International, pp. 797-802. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,492; Nonfinal office action dated May 16, 2012, 10 pages. |
Bower, et al. “Innovative PV Micro-Inverter Topology Eliminates Electrolytic Capacitors for Longer Lifetime,” 1-4244-0016-3-06 IEEE p. 2038. |
Solar Sentry Corp., Protecting Solar Investment “Solar Sentry's Competitive Advantage”, 4 pages estimated as Oct. 2008. |
Dallas Semiconductor; Battery I.D. chip from Dallas Semiconductor monitors and reports battery pack temperature, Bnet World Network, Jul. 10, 1995. |
DeHaan, S.W.H., et al; Test results of a 130W AC module, a modular solar AC power station, Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 1994; Conference Record of the 24th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Dec. 5-9, 1994; 1994 IEEE First World Conference, vol. 1, pp. 925-928. |
European patent application No. 1999111425 filed Nov. 6, 1999; and various office actions. |
Gomez, M; “Consulting in the solar power age,” IEEE-CNSV: Consultants' Network of Silicon Valley, Nov. 13, 2007. |
Guo, G.Z.; “Design of a 400W, 1 Omega, Buck-boost Inverter for PV Applications,” 32nd Annual Canadian Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 10, 2007. |
Wang, Ucilia; Greentechmedia; “National semi casts solarmagic;” www.greentechmedia.com; Jul. 2, 2008. |
Kroposki, H. Thomas and Witt, B & C; “Progress in Photovoltaic Components and Systems,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, May 1, 2000; NREL-CP-520-27460. |
Hashimoto et al; “A Novel High Performance Utility Interactive Photovoltaic Inverter System,” Department of Electrical Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Miinami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan; p. 2255, Aug. 6, 2002. |
Hua, C et al; “Control of DC-DC Converters for Solar energy System with Maximum Power Tracking,” Department of Electrical Engineering; National Yumin University of Science & Technology, Taiwan; vol. 2, Nov. 9-14, 1997; pp. 827-832. |
Kern, G; “SunSine (TM)300: Manufacture of an AC Photovoltaic Module,” Final Report, Phases I & II, Jul. 25, 1995-Jun. 30, 1998; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Mar. 1999; NREL-SR-520-26085. |
Kang, F et al; Photovoltaic Power Interface Circuit Incorporated with a Buck-boost Converter and a Full-bridge Inverter; doi:10.1016-j.apenergy.2004.10.009. |
Kretschmar, K et al; “An AC Converter with a Small DC Link Capacitor for a 15kW Permanent Magnet Synchronous Integral Motor,Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drive,” 1998;7th International Conference; Conf. Publ. No. 456; Sep. 21-23, 1998; pp. 622-625. |
Lim, Y.H. et al; “Simple Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic Arrays,” Electronics Letters May 25, 2000; vol. 36, No. 11. |
Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTM4607, estimated as Nov. 14, 2007. |
Matsuo, H et al; Novel Solar Cell Power Supply System using the Multiple-input DC-DC Converter; Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1998; INTELEC, 20th International, pp. 797-8022. |
solar-electric.com; Northern Arizona Wind & Sun, All About MPPT Solar Charge Controllers; Nov. 5, 2007. |
Oldenkamp, H. et al; AC Modules: Past, Present and Future, Workshop Installing the Solar Solution; pp. 22-23; Jan. 1998; Hatfield, UK. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,005, filed Jan. 17, 2006, First Named Inventor Gordon E. Presher, Jr. |
Rodriguez, C; “Analytic Solution to the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2007. |
De Doncker, R. W.; “Power Converter for PV-Systems,” Institute for Power Electrical Drives, RWTH Aachen Univ. Feb. 6, 2006. |
Roman, E et al; “Intelligent PV Module for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 53, No. 4, Aug. 2006. |
Russell, M.C. et al; “The Massachusetts Electric Solar Project: A Pilot Project to Commercialize Residential PC Systems,” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2000; Conference Record of the 28th IEEE; pp. 1583-1586. |
SatCon Power Systems, PowerGate Photovoltaic 50kW Power Converter System; Spec Sheet; Jun. 2004. |
Schekulin, Dirk et al; “Module-integratable Inverters in the Power-Range of 100-400 Watts,” 13th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Oct. 23-27, 1995; Nice, France; p. 1893-1896. |
Shimizu, et al; “Generation Control Circuit for Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 16, No. 3, May 2001. |
Takahashi, I. et al; “Development of a Long-life Three-phase Flywheel UPS Using an Electrolytic Capacitorless Converter-inverter,” 1999 Scripta Technica, Electr. Eng. Jpn, 127(3); 25-32. |
Walker, G.R. et al; “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul. 2004. |
Walker, G.R. et al; “PV String Per-Module Power Point Enabling Converters,” School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering; The University of Queensland, presented at the Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 2003 in Christchurch; AUPEC2003. |
Cambridge Consultants, Interface Issue 43, Autumn 2007. |
United States Provisional Application filed Oct. 15, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/980,157. |
United States Provisional Application filed Oct. 23, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/982,053. |
United States Provisional Application filed Nov. 15, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,979. |
United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 6, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,851. |
United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 6, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,893. |
United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 7, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,962. |
United States Provisional Application filed Mar. 26, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/908,095. |
United States Provisional Application filed May 9, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/916,815. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,709; First Amended Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Jul. 15, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,709, Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Jan. 30, 2009. |
Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 2007-325371. Abstract only. 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/793,704, filed Oct. 25, 2017. First Named Inventor: Porter. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-160797. Rejection dated Sep. 29, 2017. 10 pages. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068. Final rejection dated Sep. 29, 2017. English Translation. 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,574, filed Nov. 21, 2014. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
International Application No. PCT/US13/032410, filed Mar. 15, 2013. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068, international filing date: Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016, mailed Oct. 4, 2016. 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2017. 14 pages. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2737134, filed Mar. 14, 2008. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2017. 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,087, filed Mar. 24, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
European Patent Application No. 13877614; Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2016. 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. Interview date Apr. 4, 2017. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068, international filing date: Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017 mailed Mar. 15, 2017. English Translation of the Official Action. 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/612,892, filed Jun. 2, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,745, filed Aug. 17, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, 5th Notification of Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2017. 6 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 7, 2017. 8 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, First Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2014. 6 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2014. 2 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Second Notification of Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2015. 8 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Third Notification of Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2016. 7 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Fourth Notification of Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2016. 7 pages. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2702392, Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014. 2 pages. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2702392, Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013. 2 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 08796302.1, Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016. 4 pages. |
German Patent No. DE4032569A1, published Apr. 16, 1992. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Chinese Application No. 201380076592.9, Second Notification of Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017. 9 pages. |
Chinese Application No. 201380076592.9 filed Mar. 15, 2013. First Notification of Office Action and Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2016. 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance and Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Apr. 26, 2017. 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,174, filed Jun. 13, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev: Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2017. 12 pages. |
European Application No. 17150670.2. Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 7, 2017. 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,087, filed Mar. 24, 2017. First Named Inventor. Ledenev. Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2017. 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/340,540, filed Dec. 19, 2008, First Named Inventor Mordechay Avrutski. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,357, filed Jan. 21, 2009, First Named Inventor Earl G. Powell. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,042, filed Feb. 24, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,117, filed May 15, 2009, First Named Inventor Leonid Rozenboim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/542,632, filed Aug. 17, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,169, filed Sep. 25, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/628,977, filed Dec. 1, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/628,997, filed Dec. 1, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,110, filed Aug. 29, 2008, First Named Inventor Mordechay Avrutski. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,116, filed May 15, 2009, First Named Inventor Leonid Rozenboim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,929, filed Jul. 21, 2009, First Named Inventor Ron Hadar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,224, filed Dec. 4, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,271, filed Dec. 4, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,307, filed Dec. 4, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,419, filed Dec. 4, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,485, filed Dec. 6, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/951,562, filed Dec. 6, 2007, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/314,113, filed Dec. 4, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/314,115, filed Dec. 4, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,742, filed Dec. 4, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,520, filed Dec. 5, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,294, filed Mar. 25, 2009, First Named Inventor Guy Sella. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,549, filed May 5, 2009, First Named Inventor Meir Gazit. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,763, filed Mar. 24, 2009, First Named Inventor Tzachi Glovinsky. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,604, filed Mar. 24, 2009, First Named Inventor Tzachi Glovinsky. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,525, filed Dec. 5, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Adest. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/314,114, filed Dec. 4, 2008, First Named Inventor Meir Gzait. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/187,335, filed Aug. 6, 2008, First Named Inventor Amir Fishelov. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,610, filed Dec. 18, 2008, First Named Inventor James Allen. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,840, filed Jul. 1, 2009, First Named Inventor Leo Francis Casey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068, filed Apr. 14, 2010, First Named Inventor Robert M. Porter. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882, filed Apr. 13, 2010, First Named Inventor Robert M. Porter. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559, filed Apr. 9, 2010, First Named Inventor Douglas S. Schatz. |
Linares, L., et al., Improved Energy Capture in Series String Photovoltaics via Smart Distributed Power Electronics; Proceedings APEC 2009: 24th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2009. |
Knaupp, W. et al., Operation of a 10 kW PV facade with 100 W AC photovoltaic modules, 25th PVSC; May 13-17, 1996; Washington D.C. |
Schoen, T.J.N., BIPV overview & getting PV into the marketplace in the Netherlands, The 2nd World Solar Electric Buildings Conference: Sydney Mar. 8-10, 2000. |
Stern M., et al., Development of a Low-Cost Integrated 20-kW-AC Solar Tracking Subarray for Gid-Connected PV Power System Applications—Final Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Jun. 1998. |
Verhoeve, C.W.G., et al., Recent Test Results of AC-Module inverters, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, 1997. |
Roman, E., et al. Experimental results of controlled PV Module for building integrated PV systems; Science Direct; Solar Energy, vol. 82, Issue 5, May 2008, pp. 471-480. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044, Search Report dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044, Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/79605, Search Report dated Feb. 3, 20009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/79605, Written Opinion dated Feb. 3, 20009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794, Search Report dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794, Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
European Patent Application No. 07 873 361.5 Office Communication dated Jul. 12, 2010 and applicant's response dated Nov. 22, 2010. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/079605. International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 21, 2011. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/053253. International Search Report and International Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 22, 2011. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
European Application No. 0677749A3, filed Apr. 13, 1995. First Named Inventor: Takehara. Abstract only, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,666, filed Sep. 2, 2011. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. |
International Patent Application Publication No. 2009/007782A4, published Jan. 15, 2009. Applicant: SolarEdge Ltd. Abstract and Claims only. 5 pages. |
International Patent Application Publication No. 2009/072075A3, published Jun. 11, 2009. Applicant: SolarEdge Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
European Patent Application No. EP0964457A3, published May 24, 2006. Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
European Patent Application No. EP0978884A3, published Mar. 22, 2000. Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
European Patent Application No. EP1120895A3, published May 6, 2004. Applicant: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
Japanese Patent No. 05003678A, published Jan. 8, 1993. Applicant: Toshiba F EE Syst KK, et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 6035555A, published Feb. 10, 1994. Applicant: Japan Storage Battery Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 06141261A, published May 20, 1994. Applicant: Olympus Optical Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 7026849A, published Jan. 27, 1995. Applicant: Sekisui House Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 07222436A, published Aug. 18, 1995. Applicant: Meidensha Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 08033347A, published Feb. 2, 1996. Applicant: Hitachi Ltd et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 08066050A, published Mar. 8, 1996. Applicant: Hitachi Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 08181343A, published Jul. 12, 1996. Applicant: Sharp Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 8204220A, published Aug. 9, 1996. Applicant: Mistubishi Electric Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 09097918A, published Apr. 8, 1997. Applicant: Canon Inc. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 056042365A, published Apr. 20, 1981. Applicant: Seiko Epson Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 60027964A, published Feb. 13, 1985. Applicant: NEC Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 60148172A, published Aug. 5, 1985. Applicant: Seikosha Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 62154121A, published Jul. 9, 1987. Applicant: Kyocera Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 2000020150A, published Jan. 21, 2000. Applicant: Toshiba Fa Syst Eng Corp et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 2002231578A, published Aug. 16, 2002. Applicant: Meidensha Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent No. 07058843A, published Mar. 3, 1995. Applicant: Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2007104872A, published Apr. 19, 2007. Applicant: Ebara Densan Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2007225625A, filed Sep. 6, 2007. Applicant: Ahei Toyoji et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2001086765A, filed Mar. 30, 2001. Applicant: Powerware Corp. Abstract only. A page. |
Korean Patent Application No. 102005-7008700, filed May 13, 2005. Applicant: Exar Corporation. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
Korean Patent Application No. 102004-0099601, filed Dec. 1, 2004. Applicant: Lee, Seong Ryong. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
Korean Patent Application No. 102007-0036528, filed Apr. 13, 2007. Applicant: Industry-Academic Coop Foundation of Kyungnam Univ. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
International Application Publication No. WO2006/013600A3, published Feb. 9, 2006. Applicant: Universita Degli Studi DiRoma “La Sapienza”. Abstract and Search Report. 5 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2006/048689A3, published May 11, 2006. Applicant: Enecsys Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 7 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/140551A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/140543A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/140536A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
Japanese Patent No. 09148613A, filed Jun. 6, 1997. Applicant: Sanyo Electric Co Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
International Application Publication No. 2010/062662A3, published Jun. 3, 2010. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/114341A3, published Sep. 17, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/075985A3, published Jun. 18, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/064683A3, published May 22, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
International Application Publication No. 2009/059028A3, published May 7, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
Vazquez, et al., The Tapped-Inductor Boost Converter. (c) 2007 IEEE. 538-543. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016; First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2018. 15 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 17150670.2. Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2018. 9 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201380076592.9. English Translation of the 3rd Notification of Office Action, dated Feb. 7, 2018. 13 pages. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-160797. Rejection dated Mar. 27, 2018. 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160268809 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61253025 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13503011 | US | |
Child | 15164806 | US |