The present invention relates in general to power converters and, more specifically, to control of DC/DC power converters.
A common practice in the field of power conversion is to use switching power supplies to convert direct current (DC) voltage of one level to an isolated DC voltage at a second level. A circuit topology that is generally well suited for this purpose is the half bridge converter. In part, half bridge converters are preferred because of their low part count relative to full bridge converters, their compact size, and simplicity.
Half bridge converters can provide reasonably accurate control of the average output current that they generate. However, conventional half bridge converters suffer from several disadvantages. For example, it has previously been impractical to control the current by use of current programmed control in conventional half bridge converters. Capacitors coupled to the transformer primary winding tend to destabilize the current programmed control system.
Soft switching of devices is generally desirable in switching converters. An exemplary zero voltage switching (ZVS) half bridge converter utilizing soft switching is described in Yoshida, Koji et al., “A Novel Zero-Voltage-Switched Half-Bridge Converter With Active Current-Clamped Transformer.” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1996. PESC '96 Record., 27th Annual IEEE: 632-637 vol. 1, b. However, this proposal requires operation of the active clamp duty cycle at 50% in order to utilize a common gate drive transformer to drive the gates of the transistors comprising a bi-directional switch. Unfortunately, during operation with current programmed control, the voltage at the node of the converter connecting two capacitors and one side of the output transformer's primary winding can drift. The voltage should remain at approximately the midpoint voltage between the voltage rails. However, the drift, left unchecked can result in the node voltage rising or falling to the level of one of the input rails, thereby rendering the converter inoperative.
Thus, what is needed is a more reliable half bridge converter capable of controlling its average output current.
A direct current to direct current (DC/DC) converter and related methods are provided by an embodiment of the present invention. An embodiment of the DC/DC converter comprises a first switching device, a second switching device, and a control circuit configured to modulate a duty cycle of the first switching device and a duty cycle of the second switching device and further configured to compensate for a voltage drift at a monitoring node of the converter by varying at least one of the modulation of the duty cycle of the first switching device and the modulation of the duty cycle of the second switching device.
Embodiments of the control circuit comprise a first controller coupled to the first switching device and to the second switching device, and a second controller coupled to the first controller, to the monitoring node and to a voltage reference. For example, the monitoring node in an embodiment is between capacitors, each connected to an opposing voltage rail, wherein the voltage reference is one of the voltage rails and the second controller monitors voltage at the monitoring node for a drift away from the midpoint voltage between the voltage rails.
In an embodiment, in response to a voltage drift at the monitoring node, the second controller is configured to adjusting an input signal to the first controller, thereby causing the first controller to vary at least one of the modulation of the duty cycle of the first switching device and the modulation of the duty cycle of the second switching device. In some embodiments, the control circuit varies both the modulation of the duty cycle of the first switching device and the modulation of the duty cycle of the second switching device. In some embodiments, the control circuit varies the modulation of the duty cycle of only one of the switching devices, for example by lengthening or shortening the duty cycle based on whether the voltage at the monitoring node is too high or too low. In some embodiments, the DC/DC converter comprises a zero voltage switching (ZVS) half bridge DC/DC converter.
In an embodiment of a method for operating a DC/DC converter, a voltage drift at a monitoring node of the converter is sensed and at least one of a modulation of a duty cycle of a first switching device and a modulation of a duty cycle of a second switching device is varied to compensate for the voltage drift. The exemplary method further comprises modulating the duty cycle of the first switching device and the duty cycle of the second switching device with a first controller and, in response to sensing the voltage drift at the monitoring node, adjusting an input signal to the first controller to vary at least one modulation.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
In the illustrated embodiment, switches 108, 110, 112, and 114 are shown comprising transistors Q1-Q4 with body diode effects, represented as DQ1-DQ4, respectively. Each of switches 108, 110, 112, and 114 has parasitic capacitance that enables zero voltage switching (ZVS) and a control input G (i.e., a gate terminal) coupled to controller 140. As illustrated, switch 114 is coupled through node B to controller 140 and switch 112 is coupled through node C to controller 140. Controller 140 operates transistors Q1-Q4 using pulse width modulation (PWM) to control the duty cycles of switches 108, 110, 112, and 114. Also in the illustrated embodiment, system 100 is shown comprising an optional diode clamp 134, which comprises diodes 136 and 138, and an inductor 144.
Transformer 116, comprising a primary winding 122 and a secondary winding 124, is coupled to switch 114 and inductor 144 at nodes 118A and 118B. As shown in
System 100 can also define four nodes 126, 128, 130, and 132 among others. The first of these nodes, a voltage reference node 126, corresponds to the high voltage DC input terminal coupled to voltage rail 102A at voltage VIN+. The second of these nodes, 128, can likewise correspond to the low voltage DC input (VIN− or ground potential) corresponding to voltage rail 102B. Regarding the third node 130 at VBML, it may correspond to the interconnection between the two capacitors 104 and 106 and one side of primary winding 122 of transformer 116. The fourth of these particular nodes, 132, can correspond to the opposing side of primary winding 122 of transformer 116 from node 130, and is at a voltage at VBMR.
With further regard to switches 108, 110, 112 and 114, they are connected as illustrated in
Regarding bidirectional switch 142, transistors Q3 and Q4 in switches 112 and 114, respectively, are connected between nodes 118A and 132 in parallel with transformer 116. The sources of transistors Q3 and Q4 are connected as shown with the drains of transistors Q3 and Q4 being connected to nodes 118A and 132. Additionally, the gates of the transistors Q3 and Q4 receive control signals from controller 140.
In the illustrated embodiment, the power that is delivered to rectifier load 200 or 210 flows from positive rail 102A through one of two paths. These paths are (1) the path through capacitor 104, transformer 116, and switch 108; and (2) the path through switch 110, transformer 116 and capacitor 106. The magnetizing current of transformer 116 may be used, via transistors Q3 and Q4, to effect ZVS of transistors Q1 and Q2 in switches 108 and 110, respectively. Power then flows to secondary winding 124 of transformer 116 to rectifier load 200 or 210.
In operation, controller 120 senses the voltage VBML of the illustrated embodiment at node 130 and compares VBML to reference voltage VIN+ on node 126 in order to sense whether VBML has drifted away from a desired value. For example, the desired value may be the midpoint, or average, voltage between VIN+ and VIN− on voltage rails 102A and 102B, respectively. If VIN− is at ground potential, or zero volts, the desired voltage for node 130 is one-half of VIN+. Some embodiments, however may have voltage rail 102B at a different potential than ground potential or possibly operate with a different desired voltage for node 130. A variation of VBML from the desired voltage for node 130 is a voltage drift. It should be understood, however, that a voltage drift may be defined in other embodiments to include a voltage deviation at a different circuit node.
In the illustrated embodiment, controller 120 is coupled to controller 140 through node A and is configured to adjust an input signal to controller 140 in response to a voltage drift sensed at node 130. In normal operation, the voltage at node A acts as a threshold, controlling the current ramp signal in controller 140 to turn off one of transistors Q1 and Q2. By scaling the signal at node A, controller 120 can adjust the time, either advanced or delayed, at which the current ramp signal reaches the threshold. As will be described in further detail, with reference to
Turning now to
With reference now to
Just before time T0, the current from positive voltage rail 102A is flowing through transistor Q1 (which is on) and transformer 116. However, at time T0, transistor Q1 is turned off, and the parasitic capacitance of transistor Q1 is charged by the magnetizing current of transformer 116. Thus, the voltage across transistor Q1 begins to increase.
At time T1 the voltage across transistor Q1 reaches the voltage across capacitor 106. Accordingly, the voltage across body diode DQ4 drops to zero allowing body diode DQ4 to begin conducting. With body diode DQ4 conducting (i.e., the voltage drop across transistor Q4 is negligible), transistor Q4 can be switched on at zero voltage. During the time from T1 to T2, primary winding 122 of transformer 116 is short circuited by bidirectional switch 142. Thus, bidirectional switch 142 allows the primary winding 122 current, IP, of transformer 116 to continue flowing.
At time T2, transistor Q3 is turned off and the magnetizing current of transformer 116 resumes charging the parasitic capacitance of transistor Q1. The resumed charging of this capacitance causes the voltage across transistor Q1 to increase. At time T3, when the voltage across transistor Q1 has reached the voltage of positive rail 102A, body diode DQ2 of transistor Q2 becomes forward biased and begins conducting. With body diode DQ2 conducting, transistor Q2 can be switched on at zero voltage. This causes current from the positive rail 102A to flow through transistor Q2 and transformer 116. At time T4, current IL2 reverses. At time T5, transistor Q2 turns off and ceases conducting.
In normal operation, controller 140 operates transistors Q1-Q4 in switches 108, 110, 112 and 114 using PWM of their duty cycles in order to maintain the desired power output for rectifier load 200 or 210. For a higher power output requirement, controller 140 raises the duty cycles, whereas for a lower power output requirement, the duty cycles are lowered. In normal operation, the duty cycles of switches 108 and 110 are balanced and have a constant ratio of approximately one.
Whereas the duty cycles of switches 108 and 104 are modulated by controller 140 to meet power demands on the secondary winding 124 side (load side) of transformer 116, the modulation may varied to an imbalanced condition by controller 120. For example, controller 120 may cause controller 140 to drive switches 108 and 110 to deviate from a balanced duty cycle ratio in order to compensate for a voltage drift on the primary winding (122) side (source side) of transformer 116. For example, by increasing the duty cycle of switch 108 relative to the duty cycle of switch 110 to compensate for a positive voltage drift, the duty cycles of switches 108 and 110 are temporarily imbalanced and the duty cycle ratio is varied. The variation of the modulation can also compensate for a negative voltage drift by increasing the duty cycle of switch 110 relative to the duty cycle of switch 108. The relative change in the duty cycle ratio can be accomplished by one of switches 108 and 110 having its duty cycle increased or decreased, or by having either switch's duty cycle increased, or by having either switch's duty cycle decreased. Exemplary off-nominal cases are depicted in
In accordance with one embodiment, system 100 operates as follows for off-nominal cases when a voltage drift is sensed by controller 120. As depicted in
Because transistor Q1 is held on for a longer time, as depicted in
Similarly, with reference to
Because transistor Q2 is held on for a longer time, as depicted in
As an alternative to varying the control pulse widths to both transistors Q1 and Q2, controllers 120 and 140 can vary the control pulse width to just one of transistors Q1 and Q2. This approach is depicted by contrasting
Having thus described the present invention by reference to certain of its preferred embodiments, it is noted that the embodiments disclosed are illustrative rather than limiting in nature and that a wide range of variations, modifications, changes, and substitutions are contemplated in the foregoing disclosure and, in some instances, some features of the present invention may be employed without a corresponding use of the other features. Many such variations and modifications may be considered obvious and desirable by those skilled in the art based upon a review of the foregoing description of preferred embodiments. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention.
This application relates to, and claims the benefit of the filing date of, co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/947,279 entitled DC TO DC CONVERSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD, filed Jun. 29, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60947279 | Jun 2007 | US |