Disc or roll screens are used in the materials handling industry for screening flows of materials to remove certain items of desired dimensions. Disc screens are particularly suitable for classifying what is normally considered debris or residual materials. This debris may consist of soil, aggregate, asphalt, concrete, wood, biomass, ferrous and nonferrous metal, plastic, ceramic, paper, cardboard, paper products or other materials recognized as debris throughout consumer, commercial and industrial markets. The function of the disc screen is to separate the materials fed into it by size or type of material. The size classification may be adjusted to meet virtually any application.
Disc screens have a problem effectively separating Office Sized Waste Paper (OWP) since much of the OWP may have similar shapes. For example, it is difficult to effectively separate notebook paper from Old Corrugated Cardboard (OCC) since each is long and relatively flat.
Accordingly, a need remains for a system that more effectively classifies material.
Multiple shafts are aligned along a frame and configured to rotate in a direction causing paper products to move along a separation screen. The shafts are configured with a shape and spacing so that substantially rigid or semi-rigid paper products move along the screen while non-rigid or malleable paper products slide down between adjacent shafts.
In one embodiment, the screen includes at least one vacuum shaft that has a first set of air input holes configured to suck air and retain the non-rigid paper products. A second set of air output holes are configured to blow out air to dislodge the paper products retained by the input holes.
A material separation system includes a separation screen and an air directing device positioned above the separation screen. The separation screen has at least one rotating shaft, wherein the separation screen transports the relatively rigid material and relatively flexible material to the rotating shaft. The air directing device directs air towards the separation screen such that the relatively flexible material is blown beneath the rotating shaft in a first material stream, wherein the relatively rigid material continues on the separation screen past the rotating shaft in a second material stream.
Referring to
The de-inking screen 12 creates two material streams from one mixed incoming stream fed into an in feed end 18. The OCC, kraft, and large contaminants 14 are concentrated in a first material stream 20, while the de-inking material 16 is simultaneously concentrated in a second material stream 22. Very small contaminants, such as dirt, grit, paper clips, etc. may also be concentrated with the de-inking material 16. Separation efficiency may not be absolute and a percentage of both materials 14 and 16 may be present in each respective material stream 20 and 22 after processing.
The separation process begins at the in feed end 18 of the screen 12. An in feed conveyor (not shown) meters the mixed material 14 and 16 onto the de-inking screen 12. The screen 12 contains multiple shafts 24 mounted on a frame 26 with brackets 28 so as to be aligned parallel with each other. The shafts 24 rotate in a forward manner propelling and conveying the incoming materials 14 and 16 in a forward motion.
The circumference of some of the shafts 24 may be round along the entire length, forming continuous and constant gaps or openings 30 along the entire width of the screen 12 between each shaft 24. The shafts 24 in one embodiment are covered with a roughtop conveyor belting to provide the necessary forward conveyance at high speeds. Wrappage of film, etc. is negligible due to the uniform texture and round shape of the rollers. Alternatively, some of the shafts 24 may contain discs having single or dual diameter shapes to aide in moving the materials 14 and 16 forward. One disc screen is shown in
The distance between each rotating shaft 24 can be mechanically adjusted to increase or decrease the size of gaps 30. For example, slots 32 in bracket 28 allow adjacent shafts 24 to be spaced apart at variable distances. Only a portion of bracket 28 is shown to more clearly illustrate the shapes, spacings and operation of shafts 24. Other attachment mechanisms can also be used for rotatably retaining the shafts 24.
The rotational speed of the shafts 24 can be adjusted offering processing flexibility. The rotational speed of the shafts 24 can be varied by adjusting the speed of a motor 34 or the ratio of gears 36 used on the motor 34 or on the screen 12 to rotate the shafts 24. Several motor(s) may also be used to drive different sets of shafts 24 at different rotational speeds.
Even if the incoming mixed materials 14 and 16 may be similar in physical size, material separation is achieved due to differences in the physical characteristics of the materials. Typically, the de-inking material 16 is more flexible, malleable, and heavier in density than materials 14. This allows the de-inking material 16 to fold over the rotating shafts 24A and 24B, for example, and slip through the open gaps while moving forward over the shafts 24.
In contrast, the OCC, kraft, and contaminants 14 are more rigid, forcing these materials to be propelled from the in feed end 18 of screen 12 to a discharge end 40. Thus, the two material streams 20 and 22 are created by mechanical separation. The de-inking screen 12 can be manufactured to any size, contingent on specific processing capacity requirements.
A second stage 50 aligns the shafts 24 at wider spaces 52 compared with the spaces 48 in first stage 48. This allows de-inking materials 58 to slide through the wider gaps 52 formed in the screening surface of the second stage 50 as described above in
The OCC, kraft, and large contaminants 56 are conveyed over a discharge end 54 of screen 42. The two-stage screen 42 can also vary the shaft spacing and rotational speed for different types of material separation applications and different throughput requirements. Again, some of the shafts 24 may contain single or dual diameter discs to aide in moving the material stream forward along the screen 42 (see
The spacing between shafts in stages 44 and 50 is not shown to scale. In one embodiment, the shafts 24 shown in
Referring to
The vacuum shafts 60 are hollow and include an opening 65 at one end for receiving a plenum divider assembly 70. The opposite end 74 of the shaft 60 is closed off. The divider 70 includes multiple fins 72 that extend radially out from a center hub 73. The divider 70 is sized to insert into the opening 65 of vacuum shaft 60 providing a relatively tight abutment of fins 72 against the inside walls of the vacuum shaft 60 to maintain a separation of air flow between one or more of the multiple chambers 66, 68 and 69 formed inside shaft 60. In one embodiment, the divider 70 is made from a rigid material such as steel, plastic, wood, or stiff cardboard.
A negative air flow 62 is introduced into one of the chambers 66 formed by the divider 70. The negative air flow 62 sucks air 76 through the perforations 61 along a top area of the shafts 60 that are exposed to the material stream. The air suction 76 into chamber 66 encourages smaller, flexible fiber, or de-inking material 58 to adhere to the shafts 60 during conveyance across the screening surface.
In one embodiment, the negative air flow 62 is restricted just to this top area of the vacuum shafts 60. However, prior to or during operation of the de-inking screen, the location of the air suction portion of the vacuum shaft 60 can be repositioned simply by rotating the fins 72 inside shaft 60. Thus, in some applications, the air suction portion may be moved more toward the top front or more toward the top rear of the shaft 60. The air suction section can also be alternated from front to rear in adjacent shafts to promote better adherence of the de-inking material to the shafts 60.
The negative air flow 62 is recirculated through a vacuum pump 78 (
The second stage 50 (
During rotation, the arched shapes of the primary disc 86 and the secondary disc 88 maintain a substantially constant spacing with similarly shaped dual diameter discs on adjacent shafts. However, the different relative size between the primary discs 86 and the secondary discs 88 eliminate the secondary slot Dsp that normally exists between adjacent shafts for single diameter discs. The discs shown in
The primary discs 86 on the shafts 92 are aligned with the secondary discs 88 on adjacent shafts 92 and maintain a substantially constant spacing during rotation. The alternating alignment of the primary discs 86 with the secondary discs 88 both laterally across each shaft and longitudinally between adjacent shafts eliminate the rectangular shaped secondary slots that normally extended laterally across the entire width of the screen. Since large thin materials can no longer unintentionally pass through the screen, the large materials are carried along the screen and deposited in the correct location with other oversized materials.
The dual diameter discs 84, or the other single discs 80 or 82 shown in
Depending on the character and size of the debris to be classified, the diameter of the discs may vary. Again, depending on the size, character and quantity of the materials, the number of discs per shaft can also vary. In an alternative embodiment, there are no spacers used between the adjacent discs on the shafts.
A third stage 106 comprises a plurality of rotating shafts 24 that are shown as being smaller in diameter than rotating shafts 107 and with a smaller gap formed between the rotating shafts 24. In one embodiment, rotating shafts 24 are the same diameter as rotating shafts 107 or may be of a larger diameter. Similarly, the gaps formed between either of the rotating shafts 24 or 107 may be varied to accommodate different types of materials and separation processes.
It should be understood that shafts 24, 105, and 107 may be mounted on a frame 26 with brackets 28 so as to be aligned parallel with each other, similar to that shown in
The de-inking screen 100 may be configured to mechanically separate rigid or semi-rigid materials 14 such as cardboard, Old Corrugated Containers (OCC), kraft, etc. from de-inking material 16 including office paper, newsprint, magazines, journals, junk mail, and other types of malleable, non-rigid, or flexible materials. The de-inking screen 100 creates two or more material streams from one mixed incoming stream fed onto the screening surface. The rigid or semi-rigid materials 14 are separated into the first material stream 20, while the de-inking material 16 is separated into the second material stream 22.
The air separation system 150 comprises one or more air knives 115, 120 which operate to blow or otherwise direct air towards the de-inking screen 100. The air knives 115, 120 may be located above the de-inking screen 100 such that the air is generally directed down or at an angle onto the top surface of the materials being separated. The air knives 115, 120 may be positioned adjacent to or spaced apart from each other.
The air knives 115, 120 may be connected to one or more pumps or blowers 108 that generate an air flow or air pressure. Blower 108 may included a centrifugal or high speed pump. In one embodiment, blower 108 operates using between five and ten horsepower.
Air knife 115 is shown directing air flow 114 towards or past one or more of the rotating shafts 24. The direction of the air flow 114 may be adjusted according to a comb, vent or baffle 112. For example, baffle 112 may be configured to direct the air flow 114 slightly towards one of the rotating shafts 24 at an incident angle to the screening surface. Baffle 122 associated with a second air knife 120 is illustrated with the air flow 124 being directed between two adjacent rotating shafts, such that air flow 124 is substantially perpendicular to the screening surface. In addition to controlling the direction of the air flow 114, 124, the baffle 112, 122 may also adjust the air speed.
As the relatively non-rigid or flexible de-inking material 16 passes over the rotating shaft 24, air stream 114 causes a leading edge of the de-inking material 16 to be blown down through the gap between the rotating shaft 24 and an adjacent rotating shaft as material stream 22. The relatively rigid or semi-rigid materials 14, on the other hand, continues along the screening surface of the de-inking screen 100 as material stream 20 and without passing through the gap of rotating shafts 24.
In one embodiment, the air pressure or air flow of one or more air streams 114, 124 can be increased or decreased by a valve 115 or other means of adjustment. In another embodiment, the power associated with one or more of the blowers 108 may be adjusted to similarly vary the air pressure or air flow of the air stream 114, 124. One blower 108 may be configured to provide air pressure and air flow to a plurality of air knives 110, 210. Although the air separation system 150 is shown with two air knives 110, 120, different embodiments may also include only one air knife or a plurality of air knives in excess of two.
Air knife 110 is illustrated as being positioned further from the screening surface of the de-inking screen 100 as compared to the air knife 120. The distances of the air knives 110, 120 from the screening surface may be adjusted, for example, to control the air pressure, air flow, or the amount of lateral dispersion of the air streams 114, 124. By controlling the air pressure, air flow, and/or direction of the air stream 114, 124, the air separation system 150 can be configured to separate different types of materials. In the embodiment illustrated in
The air separation system may also be configured to separate different types of de-inking materials. For example, the first air knife 110 with a first, relatively lower air pressure may be configured to separate thin plastic film or plastic bags from paper products or paper fiber. Whereas the plastic materials are directed through the rolling shafts 24 by the first air knife 110, the paper continues along the screening surface of the de-inking screen 100 to the second air knife 120.
The second air knife 120 may be configured with a relatively higher air pressure as compared to the first air knife 110, such that the paper would be directed through the rolling shafts 24 by the second air knife 120. Any rigid or semi-rigid materials 14 would continue on the screening surface past the first and second air knives 110, 120 as material stream 20. Accordingly, the air separation system 150 can separate at least two types of de-inking materials, including paper and plastic, from rigid materials 14 into at three or more separate material streams.
In one embodiment, air separation system 150 comprises an optical reader 130 that detects the type of materials being transported along the screening surface of the de-inking screen 100. Optical reader 130 can distinguish flexible materials 16 from the rigid materials 14. Similarly, optical reader 130 can distinguish different types of flexible materials 16 such as paper and plastic. One or both of the air knives 110, 120 may be activated according to the type of material that the optical reader 130 detects.
Air knife 110 may be activated when the optical reader 130 detects plastic bags or plastic film, such that air stream 114 is generated in response to detecting plastic. Similarly, air knife 120 may be activated when the optical reader 130 detects paper, such that air stream 124 is generated in response to detecting paper. In other embodiments, the air streams 114, 124 is continuously generated by the air knife 110, 120 while any materials are being transported on the de-inking screen 100.
The air directing device 175 may include one or more tubular structures that receive the air flow from the blower 108. In one embodiment, air directing device 175 comprises a plurality of holes that release the curtain of air 160 as a plurality of air jet streams corresponding to the number of holes in the air directing device 175. In another embodiment, the air directing device 175 comprises a longitudinal slit that releases the curtain of air as a continuous planar sheet of air extending nearly the length of the air directing device 175.
The air directing device may include one or more nozzles or valves configured to direct a stream or burst of air towards the materials on the screening surface. The nozzles or valves can be adjusted to control the general direction or angle of the air curtain 160. In other embodiments, the air directing device 175 comprises one or more combs, vents, or baffles 112, 122 (
The air separation system 150, 200 and de-inking screen 100 in general can be configured to optimize the separation of different types of materials by varying one or more of: the diameter of the rollers 24, the rate or speed of rotation of the rollers 24, the spacing or gap between rollers 24, the width of the de-inking screen 100, the speed or rate at which materials are transported on the de-inking screen 100, the air speed, air pressure, size and angle/direction of air flow of the air streams 114, 124 or air curtain 160, duration of air flow (e.g. bursts of air or continuous flow of air), size and shape of air knife 110, 120 or air directing device 175, the number of air knives, and the type and power of the one or more blowers 108, in addition to the other features described herein.
The air separation system 150, 200 may be combined with one or more rotating shafts, such as vacuum shafts 60 of
Employing the vacuum shaft 60 and/or the air separation system 150, 200 can result in a significant decrease in overall length, and hence number of shafts, of the de-inking screen 100 while providing an improved ability to separate flows of different types of materials. The amount of time required to effectively separate materials is known in the art as a residence time. The vacuum shaft 60 and/or the air separation system 150, 200 as disclosed herein operate to reduce the residence time. Furthermore, the vacuum shaft 60 and/or the air separation system 150, 200 are operable with a relatively reduced gap between rollers as compared to conventional material separation screens. A reduced gap serves to reduce the overall length of the de-inking screen 100, and also serves to better control the size and type of materials being separated.
It will be understood that variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of this invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/709,447, filed Feb. 19, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/206,683, filed Sep. 8, 2008, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,396, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/823,835, filed Apr. 13, 2004, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,434,695, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/264,298, filed Oct. 2, 2002, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,726,028, which claimed priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/326,805, filed Oct. 2, 2001; all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1679593 | Williamson et al. | Aug 1928 | A |
1913876 | Frederick | Jun 1933 | A |
2949187 | Owens | Aug 1960 | A |
3013662 | Philips | Dec 1961 | A |
3143492 | Bullock | Aug 1964 | A |
3431139 | Stroszynski | Mar 1969 | A |
3477566 | Autenrieth et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3545746 | Clayton et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3643797 | Berkowitz et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3738483 | MacKenzie | Jun 1973 | A |
3788568 | Marsh | Jan 1974 | A |
3873033 | Tilby | Mar 1975 | A |
4087177 | Gumm et al. | May 1978 | A |
4092241 | Mackenzie et al. | May 1978 | A |
4155602 | Quick | May 1979 | A |
4165278 | Jaffey | Aug 1979 | A |
4202542 | Lammers et al. | May 1980 | A |
4352731 | Moudgil et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377401 | Laughlin | Mar 1983 | A |
4466605 | Leuthold et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4685569 | Osaki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4789068 | Gilmore | Dec 1988 | A |
4798508 | Lewis | Jan 1989 | A |
4853112 | Brown | Aug 1989 | A |
4895642 | Frei | Jan 1990 | A |
4915824 | Surtees | Apr 1990 | A |
4946046 | Affleck et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5025929 | Carrera | Jun 1991 | A |
5074992 | Clinton | Dec 1991 | A |
5344025 | Tyler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361909 | Gemmer | Nov 1994 | A |
5398818 | McGarvey | Mar 1995 | A |
5450966 | Clark et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5480034 | Kobayashi | Jan 1996 | A |
5506123 | Chieffalo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5555985 | Kobayashi | Sep 1996 | A |
5582300 | Kobayashi | Dec 1996 | A |
5590792 | Kobayashi | Jan 1997 | A |
5626239 | Kobayashi | May 1997 | A |
5733592 | Wettstein et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5799801 | Clark et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5901856 | Brantley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913268 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5957306 | Hoffman | Sep 1999 | A |
5960964 | Austin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967333 | Smith | Oct 1999 | A |
6003681 | Wilbur et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36537 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | E |
6076684 | Bollegraaf | Jun 2000 | A |
6077021 | Roman | Jun 2000 | A |
6079929 | Muma et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089814 | Bayer | Jul 2000 | A |
6110242 | Young | Aug 2000 | A |
6144004 | Doak | Nov 2000 | A |
6149018 | Austin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6250472 | Grubbs et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253924 | Bleifuss et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6253927 | Vaananen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6365857 | Maehata et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369882 | Bruner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371305 | Austin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6494452 | Karasiewicz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6648145 | Davis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6726028 | Visscher et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6903294 | Daiku et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6936784 | Ogburn et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7237680 | Viny | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7893378 | Kenny | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7994448 | Kenny | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20030116486 | Davis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040069693 | Paladin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070084757 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4415069 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0546442 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0773070 | May 1997 | EP |
07-213999 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-150372 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-206688 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H09 240830 | Sep 1997 | JP |
3288289 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2010-005614 | Jan 2010 | JP |
WO 03028906 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2006020455 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2008059209 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2011023579 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nihot, Solutions in air-controlled separation, The Nihot Windshifter, Catalog. |
Nihot, Sort it out with air, The Nihot Drum Separators, Catalog. |
International Search Report; PCT/US2008/054621; Dated Sep. 16, 2008. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/035130, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Feb. 9, 2011, 10 pages. |
EP Application No. 11781039.0, Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion, dated Jun. 4, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110100884 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60326805 | Oct 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12206683 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 12709447 | US | |
Parent | 10823835 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 12206683 | US | |
Parent | 10264298 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10823835 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12709447 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 12780585 | US |