Disc or roll screens are used in the materials handling industry for screening flows of materials to remove certain items of desired dimensions. Disc screens are particularly suitable for classifying what is normally considered debris or residual materials. This debris may consist of soil, aggregate, asphalt, concrete, wood, biomass, ferrous and nonferrous metal, plastic, ceramic, paper, cardboard, paper products or other materials recognized as debris throughout consumer, commercial and industrial markets. The function of the disc screen is to separate the materials fed into it by size or type of material. The size classification may be adjusted to meet virtually any application.
Disc screens have a problem effectively separating Office Sized Waste Paper (OWP) since much of the OWP may have similar shapes. For example, it is difficult to effectively separate notebook paper from Old Corrugated Cardboard (OCC) since each is long and relatively flat.
Accordingly, a need remains for a system that more effectively classifies material.
Multiple shafts are aligned along a frame and configured to rotate in a direction causing paper products to move along a separation screen. The shafts are configured with a shape and spacing so that substantially rigid or semi-rigid paper products move along the screen while non-rigid or malleable paper products slide down between adjacent shafts.
In one embodiment, the screen includes at least one vacuum shaft that has a first set of air input holes configured to suck air and retain the non-rigid paper products. A second set of air output holes are configured to blow out air to dislodge the paper products retained by the input holes.
Referring to
The de-inking screen 12 creates two material streams from one mixed incoming stream fed into an in feed end 18. The OCC, kraft, and large contaminants 14 are concentrated in a first material stream 20, while the de-inking material 16 is simultaneously concentrated in a second material stream 22. Very small contaminants, such as dirt, grit, paper clips, etc. may also be concentrated with the de-inking material 16. Separation efficiency may not be absolute and a percentage of both materials 14 and 16 may be present in each respective material stream 20 and 22 after processing.
The separation process begins at the in feed end 18 of the screen 12. An in feed conveyor (not shown) meters the mixed material 14 and 16 onto the de-inking screen 12. The screen 12 contains multiple shafts 24 mounted on a frame 26 with brackets 28 so as to be aligned parallel with each other. The shafts 24 rotate in a forward manner propelling and conveying the incoming materials 14 and 16 in a forward motion.
The circumference of some of the shafts 24 may be round along the entire length, forming continuous and constant gaps or openings 30 along the entire width of the screen 12 between each shaft 24. The shafts 24 in one embodiment are covered with a roughtop conveyor belting to provide the necessary forward conveyance at high speeds. Wrappage of film, etc. is negligible due to the uniform texture and round shape of the rollers. Alternatively, some of the shafts 24 may contain discs having single or dual diameter shapes to aide in moving the materials 14 and 16 forward. One disc screen is shown in
The distance between each rotating shaft 24 can be mechanically adjusted to increase or decrease the size of gaps 30. For example, slots 32 in bracket 28 allow adjacent shafts 24 to be spaced apart at variable distances. Only a portion of bracket 28 is shown to more clearly illustrate the shapes, spacings and operation of shafts 24. Other attachment mechanisms can also be used for rotatably retaining the shafts 24.
The rotational speed of the shafts 24 can be adjusted offering processing flexibility. The rotational speed of the shafts 24 can be varied by adjusting the speed of a motor 34 or the ratio of gears 36 used on the motor 34 or on the screen 12 to rotate the shafts 24. Several motor(s) may also be used to drive different sets of shafts 24 at different rotational speeds.
Even if the incoming mixed materials 14 and 16 may be similar in physical size, material separation is achieved due to differences in the physical characteristics of the materials. Typically, the de-inking material 16 is more flexible, malleable, and heavier in density than materials 14. This allows the de-inking material 16 to fold over the rotating shafts 24A and 24B, for example, and slip through the open gaps while moving forward over the shafts 24.
In contrast, the OCC, kraft, and contaminants 14 are more rigid, forcing these materials to be propelled from the in feed end 18 of screen 12 to a discharge end 40. Thus, the two material streams 20 and 22 are created by mechanical separation. The de-inking screen 12 can be manufactured to any size, contingent on specific processing capacity requirements.
A second stage 50 aligns the shafts 24 at wider spaces 52 compared with the spaces 48 in first stage 48. This allows de-inking materials 58 to slide through the wider gaps 52 formed in the screening surface of the second stage 50 as described above in
The OCC, kraft, and large contaminants 56 are conveyed over a discharge end 54 of screen 42. The two-stage screen 42 can also vary the shaft spacing and rotational speed for different types of material separation applications and different throughput requirements. Again, some of the shafts 24 may contain single or dual diameter discs to aide in moving the material stream forward along the screen 42 (see
The spacing between shafts in stages 44 and 50 is not shown to scale. In one embodiment, the shafts 24 shown in
Referring to
The vacuum shafts 60 are hollow and include an opening 65 at one end for receiving a plenum divider assembly 70. The opposite end 74 of the shaft 60 is closed off. The divider 70 includes multiple fins 72 that extend radially out from a center hub 73. The divider 70 is sized to insert into the opening 65 of vacuum shaft 60 providing a relatively tight abutment of fins 72 against the inside walls of the vacuum shaft 60. The divider 70 forms multiple chambers 66, 68 and 69 inside shaft 60. In one embodiment, the divider 70 is made from a rigid material such as steel, plastic, wood, or stiff cardboard.
A negative air flow 62 is introduced into one of the chambers 66 formed by the divider 70. The negative air flow 62 sucks air 76 through the perforations 61 along a top area of the shafts 60 that are exposed to the material stream. The air suction 76 into chamber 66 encourages smaller, flexible fiber, or de-inking material 58 to adhere to the shafts 60 during conveyance across the screening surface.
In one embodiment, the negative air flow 62 is restricted just to this top area of the vacuum shafts 60. However, the location of the air suction portion of the vacuum shaft 60 can be repositioned simply by rotating the fins 72 inside shaft 60. Thus, in some applications, the air suction portion may be moved more toward the top front or more toward the top rear of the shaft 60. The air suction section can also be alternated from front to rear in adjacent shafts to promote better adherence of the de-inking material to the shafts 60.
The negative air flow 62 is recirculated through a vacuum pump 78 (
The second stage 50 (
During rotation, the arched shapes of the primary disc 86 and the secondary disc 88 maintain a substantially constant spacing with similarly shaped dual diameter discs on adjacent shafts. However, the different relative size between the primary discs 86 and the secondary discs 88 eliminate the secondary slot DSP that normally exists between adjacent shafts for single diameter discs. The discs shown in
The primary discs 86 on the shafts 92 are aligned with the secondary discs 88 on adjacent shafts 92 and maintain a substantially constant spacing during rotation. The alternating alignment of the primary discs 86 with the secondary discs 88 both laterally across each shaft and longitudinally between adjacent shafts eliminate the rectangular shaped secondary slots that normally extended laterally across the entire width of the screen. Since large thin materials can no longer unintentionally pass through the screen, the large materials are carried along the screen and deposited in the correct location with other oversized materials.
The dual diameter discs 84, or the other single discs 80 or 82 shown in
Depending on the character and size of the debris to be classified, the diameter of the discs may vary. Again, depending on the size, character and quantity of the materials, the number of discs per shaft can also vary. In an alternative embodiment, there are no spacers used between the adjacent discs on the shafts.
It will be understood that variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of this invention.
This application is a continuation of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/206,683, filed Sep. 8, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,396, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10,823,835 filed Apr. 13, 2004 now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,434,695, which is a continuation of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 10/264,298, filed Oct. 2, 2002, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,726,028, which claimed priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/326,805, filed Oct. 2, 2001; all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1679593 | Williamson et al. | Aug 1928 | A |
1913876 | Frederick | Jun 1933 | A |
2949187 | Owens | Aug 1960 | A |
3013662 | Philips | Dec 1961 | A |
3143492 | Bullock | Aug 1964 | A |
3431139 | Stroszynski | Mar 1969 | A |
3477566 | Autenrieth et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3545746 | Clayton et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3643797 | Berkowitz et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3738483 | MacKenzie | Jun 1973 | A |
3788568 | Marsh | Jan 1974 | A |
3873033 | Tilby | Mar 1975 | A |
4087177 | Gumm et al. | May 1978 | A |
4092241 | Mackenzie et al. | May 1978 | A |
4155602 | Quick | May 1979 | A |
4165278 | Jaffey | Aug 1979 | A |
4202542 | Lammers et al. | May 1980 | A |
4352731 | Moudgil et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377401 | Laughlin | Mar 1983 | A |
4466605 | Leuthold et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4685569 | Osaki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4789068 | Gilmore | Dec 1988 | A |
4798508 | Lewis | Jan 1989 | A |
4853112 | Brown | Aug 1989 | A |
4895642 | Frei | Jan 1990 | A |
4915824 | Surtees | Apr 1990 | A |
4946046 | Affleck et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5025929 | Carrera | Jun 1991 | A |
5074992 | Clinton | Dec 1991 | A |
5344025 | Tyler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361909 | Gemmer | Nov 1994 | A |
5450966 | Clark et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5506123 | Chieffalo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5733592 | Wettstein et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5799801 | Clark et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5901856 | Brantley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913268 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5957306 | Hoffman | Sep 1999 | A |
5960964 | Austin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967333 | Smith | Oct 1999 | A |
6003681 | Wilbur et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36537 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | E |
6076684 | Bollegraaf | Jun 2000 | A |
6077021 | Roman | Jun 2000 | A |
6079929 | Muma et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089814 | Bayer | Jul 2000 | A |
6110242 | Young | Aug 2000 | A |
6144004 | Doak | Nov 2000 | A |
6149018 | Austin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6250472 | Grubbs et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253924 | Bleifuss et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6253927 | Vaananen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6365857 | Maehata et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369882 | Bruner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371305 | Austin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6494452 | Karasiewicz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6648145 | Davis | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6726028 | Visscher et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6903294 | Daiku et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6936784 | Ogburn et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7237680 | Viny | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7893378 | Kenny | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7994448 | Kenny | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20030116486 | Davis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040069693 | Paladin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070084757 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4415069 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0546442 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0773070 | May 1997 | EP |
WO 2008059209 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nihot, Solutions in air-controlled separation, The Nihot Windshifter, Catalog. |
Nihot, Sort it out with air, The Nihot Drum Separators, Catalog. |
International Search Report; PCT/US2008/054621; Dated Sep. 16, 2008. |
Campbell et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/780,585, filed May 14, 2010 “De-Inking Screen with Air Knife” (CIP of the present application). |
Office action dated Feb. 1, 2013 from pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/780,585 filed May 14, 2010 for “De-Inking Screen with Air Knife” (CIP of the present application). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100206783 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60326805 | Oct 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12206683 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 12709447 | US | |
Parent | 10823835 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 12206683 | US | |
Parent | 10264298 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10823835 | US |