De novo synthesized nucleic acid libraries

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10975372
  • Patent Number
    10,975,372
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 10, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 13, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are methods for the generation of nucleic acid libraries encoding for gRNA sequences. The gRNAs encoded by methods described herein may be single or double gRNA sequences. Methods described provide for the generation of gRNA libraries, as a DNA precursor or as a RNA transcription product, with improved accuracy and uniformity.
Description
SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Aug. 21, 2017, is named 44854-727_401_SL.txt and is 13,567 bytes in size.


BACKGROUND

The cornerstone of synthetic biology is the design, build, and test process—an iterative process that requires DNA to be made accessible for rapid and affordable generation and optimization of these custom pathways and organisms. In the design phase, the A, C, T, and G nucleotides that constitute DNA are formulated into the various sequences that would comprise a region of interest, with each sequence variant representing a specific hypothesis that will be tested. These variant sequences represent subsets of sequence space, a concept that originated in evolutionary biology and pertains to the totality of sequences that make up genes, genomes, transcriptome, and proteome. In the context of targeted genome editing, there exists a need for rapid generation of highly accurate and uniform nucleic acid libraries for specifically directing enzymatic editing of a gene, a gene cluster, a pathway, or an entire genome.


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Provided herein are systems, methods, and compositions for the efficient de novo synthesis and screening of highly accurate nucleic acid libraries. Nucleic acid libraries as described herein comprise nucleic acids for specifically targeting and editing a gene, a gene cluster, a biological pathway, or an entire genome.


Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the nucleic acid library comprises at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a different gRNA sequence, and wherein at least about 80% of the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of a mean frequency for each of the non-identical DNA molecules in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule has a GC base content of about 20% to about 85%. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule has a GC base content of about 30% to about 70%. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein at least about 90% of the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of the mean frequency for each of the non-identical DNA molecules in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein at least 99% of the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of the mean frequency for each of the non-identical DNA molecules in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises at least 2000 non-identical DNA molecules. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises at least 3500 non-identical DNA molecules. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises at least 100,000 non-identical DNA molecules. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule comprises up to 200 bases in length. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule comprises about 100 to about 200 bases in length. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises non-identical DNA molecules encoding for gRNA sequences targeting genes in a biological pathway. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises non-identical DNA molecules encoding for gRNA sequences targeting genes in an entire genome. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the gRNA is a single gRNA or a dual gRNA.


Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the nucleic acid library comprises at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid encodes for a different sgRNA sequence, wherein each sgRNA sequence comprises a targeting domain complementary to a eukaryotic gene, and wherein at least about 80% of the at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids are present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of a mean frequency for each of the non-identical nucleic acids in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid has a GC base content of about 20% to about 85%. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid has a GC base content of about 30% to about 70%. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein at least about 90% of the at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of the mean frequency for each of the non-identical nucleic acids in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein at least 99% of the at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of the mean frequency for each of the non-identical nucleic acids in the library. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid comprises up to 200 bases in length. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid comprises about 100 to about 200 bases in length. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids comprise non-identical nucleic acids encoding for sgRNA sequences targeting genes in a biological pathway. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein the at least 2000 non-identical nucleic acids comprise non-identical nucleic acids encoding for sgRNA sequences targeting genes in an entire genome. Provided herein are nucleic acid libraries, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid comprises DNA or RNA molecules.


Provided herein are amplicon libraries, wherein the amplicon library comprises a plurality of non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA is present in a population of amplification products, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a different gRNA sequence, and wherein at least about 80% of the plurality of non-identical DNA molecules are each present in the amplicon library in an amount within 2× of a mean frequency for each of the non-identical DNA molecules in the library. Provided herein are amplicon libraries, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule has a GC base content of about 30% to about 70%. Provided herein are amplicon libraries, wherein the gRNA is a single gRNA or a dual gRNA.


Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the cell library comprises a plurality of cell populations, wherein each of the cell populations comprises a DNA molecule encoding for a different gRNA sequence, wherein each gRNA sequence comprises a targeting region for binding to a gene, and wherein at least 15% of the cell populations have at least 2-fold depletion in expression of the gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein at least 45% of the cell populations have at least 2-fold depletion in expression of the gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the gRNA is a single gRNA or a dual gRNA. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for at least 3 different gRNA sequences per a single gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for at least 5 different gRNA sequences per a single gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises at least 2000 cell populations. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for gRNA sequences in a biological pathway. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for gRNA sequences in an entire genome. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the genome is Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Canis lupus familiaris, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Danio rerio, Dictyostelium discoideum, Drosophila melanogaster, Escherichia coli, Homo sapiens, Macaca mulatta, Mus musculus, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Rattus norvegicus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or Sus scrofa. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein each of the cell populations comprises prokaryotic cells. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein each of the cell populations comprises eukaryotic cells. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein each of the cell populations comprises mammalian cells. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein each of the cell populations further comprises an exogenous nuclease enzyme. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the DNA molecule further comprises a vector sequence.


Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the cell library comprises a plurality of cell populations, wherein each of the cell populations comprises a DNA molecule encoding for a different gRNA sequence, wherein each gRNA sequence comprises a targeting region for binding to a gene, and wherein at most 20% of the cell populations have a zero or negative depletion in expression of the gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the gRNA is a single gRNA or a dual gRNA. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for at least 3 different gRNA sequences per a single gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises DNA molecules encoding for at least 5 different gRNA sequences per a single gene. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises at least 2000 cell populations. Provided herein are cell libraries, wherein the plurality of cell populations comprises at least 10000 cell populations.


Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, comprising: providing predetermined sequences for at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a gRNA; synthesizing the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules; and transcribing the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules to generate a library of gRNAs, wherein at least about 75% of the gRNAs in the library of gRNAs are error free compared to the predetermined sequences for the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, further comprising transferring the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules into cells prior to the transcribing step. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein at least 96% of the gRNAs encoded by the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are present in the library of gRNAs. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein at least 87% of the gRNAs in the library of gRNAs are error free compared to the predetermined sequences for the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, further comprising inserting the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules into vectors. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, further comprising transferring the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules to cells of an organism. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein the organism is Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Canis lupus familiaris, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Danio rerio, Dictyostelium discoideum, Drosophila melanogaster, Escherichia coli, Homo sapiens, Macaca mulatta, Mus musculus, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Rattus norvegicus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or Sus scrofa. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a single gRNA or a dual gRNA.


Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, comprising: providing predetermined sequences for a plurality of non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a gRNA; providing a surface, wherein the surface comprises clusters of loci for nucleic acid extension reaction; synthesizing the plurality of non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule extends from the surface; and transferring the plurality of non-identical DNA molecules into cells. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein each cluster comprises about 50 to about 500 loci. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule comprises up to about 200 bases in length. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a single gRNA or a dual gRNA. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein the cells are prokaryotic cells. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein the cells are eukaryotic cells. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein the eukaryotic are mammalian cells. Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a gRNA library, wherein each of the cells comprises an exogenous nuclease enzyme.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A illustrates a Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) complex which includes the following components: PAM, target sequence, CAS9 enzyme, Guide RNA (gRNA), and donor DNA.



FIG. 1B illustrates a Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) complex which includes the following components: PAM, target sequence, CAS9 enzyme, Guide RNA (gRNA), and donor DNA for a non-homologous end joining repair (NHEJ) pathway.



FIG. 2 illustrates a gRNA library screening workflow, including design, synthesis, cloning, packaging, screening and analysis of a gRNA library.



FIG. 3 illustrates gRNA library screening workflow for building a library, including: synthesizing an oligonucleotide library on an array, amplifying and transferring the oligonucleotides into vectors, and forming an expression library for gRNA expression.



FIGS. 4A-4C are diagrams of various gRNAs. FIG. 4A is diagram of a sgRNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 40) having a base-pairing region, a dCas9 handle, and a S. pyogenes terminator region. FIG. 4B is a diagram of a sgRNA alone. FIG. 4C is a diagram of a dgRNA alone.



FIG. 5A is a diagram of a sgRNA sequence in a template strand targeting arrangement.



FIG. 5B is a diagram of a sgRNA sequence in a non-template strand targeting arrangement.



FIG. 6A is a diagram of a gRNA sequence with a T7 promoter that, when transcribed, results in gRNA sequence that forms hairpin secondary structure.



FIG. 6B is a diagram of a gRNA sequence with a T7 promoter that, when transcribed, results in gRNA sequence that does not form a hairpin secondary structure.



FIG. 7 depicts a workflow for in vitro Cas9 mediated cleavage of target DNA.



FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a computer system.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an example architecture of a computer system.



FIG. 10 is a diagram demonstrating a network configured to incorporate a plurality of computer systems, a plurality of cell phones and personal data assistants, and Network Attached Storage (NAS).



FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a multiprocessor computer system using a shared virtual address memory space.



FIG. 12 depicts 4 sgRNA designs. FIG. 12 discloses SEQ ID NOS 20, 15, 21, 15, 22, 15, 41, 15, 42, and 43, respectively, in order of appearance.



FIGS. 13A-13B are plots from a BioAnalyzer reading, with nucleotide bases on the X axis and fluorescent units on the Y axis.



FIGS. 14A-14J are plots from a BioAnalyzer reading, with nucleotide bases on the X axis and fluorescent units on the Y axis.



FIG. 15 is an image of a 256 clusters, each cluster having 121 loci with oligonucleotides extending therefrom.



FIG. 16A is a plot of oligonucleotide representation (oligonucleotide frequency v. absorbance) across a plate from synthesis of 29,040 unique oligonucleotides from 240 clusters, each cluster having 121 oligonucleotides.



FIG. 16B is a plot of measurement of oligonucleotide frequency v. absorbance across each individual cluster, with control clusters identified by a box.



FIG. 17 is a plot of measurements of oligonucleotide frequency v. absorbance across four individual clusters.



FIG. 18A is a plot of on error rate v. frequency across a plate from synthesis of 29,040 unique oligonucleotides from 240 clusters, each cluster having 121 oligonucleotides.



FIG. 18B is a plot of measurement of oligonucleotide error rate v. frequency across each individual cluster, with control clusters identified by a box.



FIG. 19 is a plot of measurements of oligonucleotide error rate v. frequency across four clusters.



FIG. 20 is a plot of GC content as a measure of percent per oligonucleotide v. the number of oligonucleotides.



FIG. 21 provides plots with results from PCR with two different polymerases. Each chart depicts “observed frequency” (“0 to 35” measured in counts per 100,000) v. number of oligonucleotides (0 to 2000).



FIG. 22 provides a chart with quantification of oligonucleotide population uniformity post amplification that was recorded.



FIG. 23 depicts a plot of impact of over amplification on sequence dropouts.



FIGS. 24A-24B depict results from sequencing recovered oligonucleotides from a 10,000 sgRNA nucleic acid CRISPR library.



FIG. 25 depicts results from sequencing recovered oligonucleotides from a 101,000 sgRNA nucleic acid CRISPR library.



FIG. 26A depicts a graph of percentage of sgRNAs with at least 2-fold depletion.



FIG. 26B depicts a graph of percentage of sgRNAs with zero or negative depletion.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein are systems, methods, and compositions for the efficient synthesis and screening of highly accurate guide RNA (“gRNA”) libraries. De novo synthesis methods described herein provide for a rapid and highly accurate generation of large libraries of gRNA for incorporation into enzymatic systems for targeted gene editing.


Definitions


Throughout this disclosure, various embodiments are presented in a range format. It should be understood that the description in range format is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of any embodiments. Accordingly, the description of a range should be considered to have specifically disclosed all the possible subranges as well as individual numerical values within that range to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, description of a range such as from 1 to 6 should be considered to have specifically disclosed subranges such as from 1 to 3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from 2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc., as well as individual values within that range, for example, 1.1, 2, 2.3, 5, and 5.9. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range. The upper and lower limits of these intervening ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges, and are also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of any embodiment. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.


Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “about” in reference to a number or range of numbers is understood to mean the stated number and numbers +/−10% thereof, or 10% below the lower listed limit and 10% above the higher listed limit for the values listed for a range.


The term “gRNA” as referred to herein refers to guide RNA sequence and encompasses both single and dual guide RNA sequence. Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “dgRNA” as referred to herein refers to dual guide RNA sequence: crRNA (spacer sequence comprising a seed region complementary to a target sequence) and a separate tracrRNA (trans-activating sequence), which are partially complementary RNAs. Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “sgRNA” as referred to herein refers to single guide RNA sequence, comprising both a fused crRNA and tracrRNA.


Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the terms “oligonucleotide,” “polynucleotide,” and “nucleic acid” encompass double- or triple-stranded nucleic acids, as well as single-stranded molecules. In double- or triple-stranded nucleic acids, the nucleic acid strands need not be coextensive (i.e., a double-stranded nucleic acid need not be double-stranded along the entire length of both strands). Nucleic acid sequences, when provided, are listed in the 5′ to 3′ direction, unless stated otherwise. Methods described herein provide for the generation of isolated nucleic acids. Methods described herein additionally provide for the generation of isolated and purified nucleic acids. An “oligonucleotide,” “polynucleotide,” and “nucleic acid” as referred to herein can comprise at least 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, 300, 325, 350, 375, 400, 425, 450, 475, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, or more bases in length.


Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “amplicon” as used herein refers to an amplification reaction product.


The present disclosure employs, unless otherwise indicated, conventional molecular biology techniques, which are within the skill of the art. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which these inventions belong.


gRNA Library Screening


Provided herein are methods for designing, building, and screening a library of highly accurate gRNAs for incorporation in a Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-enzyme complex. See, e.g., FIGS. 1A-AB. gRNA libraries generated using methods described herein include both sgRNA and dgRNA libraries. Provided herein are methods for highly uniform synthesis resulting in high representation of predetermined gRNAs in the resulting libraries. In the design phase, gRNAs are designed. See FIG. 2. Design strategies include, without limitation, design of gRNAs to span a gene. Depending on the desired workflow, the de novo synthesized nucleic acids are DNA or RNA bases.


In the case of de novo synthesized DNA, a library comprising nucleic acids is synthesized, wherein each nucleic acid synthesized is a DNA sequence that encodes for a gRNA (e.g., sgRNA) sequence as a transcription product. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids are then inserted into expression vectors. In one exemplary workflow, the synthesized nucleic acids are inserted into viral vectors, and then packaged for transduction into cells, followed by screening and analysis. FIG. 2. Exemplary cells include without limitation, prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Exemplary eukaryotic cells include, without limitation, animal, plant, and fungal cells. Exemplary animal cells include, without limitation, insect, fish and mammalian cells. Exemplary mammalian cells include mouse, human, and primate cells. Exemplary cellular functions tested include, without limitation, changes in cellular proliferation, migration/adhesion, metabolic, and cell-signaling activity. In the case of de novo synthesized RNA, the gRNA itself is synthesized and available for downstream applications, such as transfection into cells.


Oligonucleotides may be synthesized within a cluster 303 of locations (“loci”) for extension on an array 301. See FIG. 3. Such an arrangement may provide for improved oligonucleotide representation of products from amplification of the synthesized oligonucleotides—termed “amplicons”-when compared to amplification products of oligonucleotides synthesized across an entire plate without a clustered loci arrangement. In some instances, amplification 310 of oligonucleotides synthesized within a single cluster counters negative effects on representation due to repeated synthesis of large oligonucleotide populations having oligonucleotides with heavy GC content, commonly termed “drift,” due to underrepresentation of GC low or GC high amplicons in the amplification reaction product. In some instances, the single cluster described herein, comprises about 50-1000, 75-900, 100-800, 125-700, 150-600, 200-500, or 300-400 discrete loci. In some instances, the single cluster comprises 50-500 discrete loci. In some instances, a locus is a spot, well, microwell, channel, or post. In some instances, each cluster has at least 1×, 2×, 3×, 4×, 5×, 6×, 7×, 8×, 9×, 10×, or more redundancy of separate features supporting extension of oligonucleotides having identical sequence.


Provided herein are gRNA libraries for insertion into expression vectors. Continuing the workflow in FIG. 3, an array 301 includes multiple clusters 303 of loci for oligonucleotide synthesis and extension. De novo DNA is synthesized and removed from the plate to form a population of oligonucleotides 305 (e.g., DNAs encoding for sgRNAs), which are subject to amplification 310 to form a library of amplified oligonucleotides 320 for insertion into a vector 330 to form a library of vectors including the synthesized DNAs 335. Once in the cells, the DNAs are transcribed into gRNAs (e.g., sgRNAs) and are available for binding with genomic editing regime (e.g., a Cas9-based system). The cells may have natural or ectopic expression of the editing enzyme (e.g., Cas9). The editing enzyme (e.g., Cas9) may have double DNA strand cleavage activity, or a modified activity, such as nicking, base swapping or sequence swapping activity. The synthesized DNA for insertion into a vector may comprise sgRNAs, dgRNAs, or fragments thereof.


Expression vectors for inserting nucleic acid libraries disclosed herein comprise eukaryotic or prokaryotic expression vectors. Exemplary expression vectors include, without limitation, mammalian expression vectors: pSF-CMV-NEO-NH2-PPT-3XFLAG, pSF-CMV-NEO-COOH-3XFLAG, pSF-CMV—PURO-NH2-GST-TEV, pSF-OXB20-COOH-TEV-FLAG(R)-6His, pCEP4 pDEST27, pSF-CMV-Ub-KrYFP, pSF-CMV-FMDV-daGFP, pEF1a-mCherry-N1 Vector, pEF1a-tdTomato Vector, pSF-CMV-FMDV-Hygro, pSF-CMV-PGK-Puro, pMCP-tag(m), and pSF-CMV—PURO-NH2-CMYC; bacterial expression vectors: pSF-OXB20-BetaGal, pSF-OXB20-Fluc, pSF-OXB20, and pSF-Tac; plant expression vectors: pRI 101-AN DNA and pCambia2301; and yeast expression vectors: pTYB21 and pKLAC2, and insect vectors: pAc5.1/V5-His A and pDEST8.


De novo oligonucleotide libraries synthesized by methods described herein may be expressed in cells. In some instances, the cells are associated with a disease state. For example, cells associated with a disease state include, but not limited to, cell lines, tissue samples, primary cells from a subject, cultured cells expanded from a subject, or cells in a model system. In some instances, the model system is a plant or animal system. In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries are expressed in cells to assess for a change in cellular activity. Exemplary cellular activities include, without limitation, proliferation, cycle progression, cell death, adhesion, migration, reproduction, cell signaling, energy production, oxygen utilization, metabolic activity, aging, response to free radical damage, or any combination thereof.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a gRNA library (or a DNA library that when transcribed results in a gRNA library), wherein the gRNA library comprises a plurality of non-identical gRNAs per a gene. The gRNA may encode a sgRNA or a dgRNA. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical gRNAs per the gene. In some instances, the gRNA library targets one or more genes. In some instances, the gRNA library targets about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes. In some instances, the gRNA library targets about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes. In some instances, the gRNA library described herein targets genes in a pathway. Exemplary pathways include, without limitation a metabolic, cell death, cell cycle progression, immune cell activation, inflammatory response, angiogenesis, lymphogenesis, hypoxia and oxidative stress response, cell adhesion, and cell migration pathways.


Methods for synthesizing a gRNA library as described herein may provide for synthesis of non-identical gRNAs having a base-pairing region complementary to part of a genome, a genome target region. The genome target region may comprise exon, intron, coding, or non-coding sequence. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs collectively having a base-pairing region complementary to at least or about 5% of the genes in an entire genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs collectively having a base-pairing region complementary to at least or about 80% of the genes in an entire genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs collectively having a base-pairing region complementary to at least or about 90% of the genes in an entire genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs collectively having a base-pairing region complementary to at least or about 95% of the genes in an entire genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs collectively having a base-pairing region complementary to at least or about 100% of the genes in an entire genome.


Provided herein are gRNA libraries synthesized by methods described herein that result in gRNAs with at least 2× depletion of a gene across different cells. In some instances, the gRNA libraries comprise at least or about 10%, 12%, 15%, 16%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65% or more of gRNAs that provide for at least 2× depletion a gene when present in cells or in a plurality of cell populations. In some instances, the gene is an essential gene, i.e. a gene critical for cell survival. Exemplary essential genes include, without limitation, PCNA, PSMA7, RPP21, and SF3B3. In some instances, the gRNA libraries comprise gRNAs that provide for at least 2×, 3×, 4×, 5×, 6×, or more than 6× depletion of a gene when present in cells. In some instances, the gRNA libraries comprise at most 5%, 10%, 12%, 15%, or 20% of the gRNAs with zero or negative depletion of the gene when present in cells or in a plurality of cell populations. In some instances, the plurality of cell populations comprises at least or about 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 12000, 15000, 20000, 25000, 30000, or more than 30000 cell populations. In some instances, the gRNA libraries comprise gRNAs with at least 2×, 3×, 4×, 5×, 6×, or more than 6× depletion for the plurality of genes. In some instances, the gRNA libraries comprise an average of at least or about 40%, 45%, 50%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80% or more than 90% of gRNAs providing at least 2× depletion for the plurality of genes. The gRNAs providing such gene deletion profiles can be sgRNAs or dgRNAs.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing highly uniform libraries of oligonucleotides. In some cases, more than 90% of synthesized oligonucleotides (RNA or DNA) are represented within 4× of the mean for oligonucleotide representation for a nucleic acid library. In some cases, more than 90% of oligonucleotides are represented within 2× of the mean for oligonucleotide representation for the library. In some cases, more than 90% of oligonucleotides are represented within 1.5× of the mean for oligonucleotide representation for the library. In some cases, more than 80% of oligonucleotides are represented within 1.5× of the mean for oligonucleotide representation for the library.


Oligonucleotide libraries de novo synthesized by methods described herein comprise a high percentage of correct sequences compared to predetermined sequences. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 70% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 75% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 80% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 85% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 90% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 95% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 100% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides.


In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 70% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 75% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 80% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 85% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 90% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have greater than 95% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have 100% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides following an amplification reaction.


In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, results in greater than 80% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, results in greater than 85% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, results in greater than 90% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, results in greater than 95% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, results in 100% correct sequence compared to predetermined sequences for the oligonucleotides.


In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, result in greater than 80% sequence representation. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, result in greater than 90% sequence representation. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, result in greater than 95% sequence representation. In some instances, de novo synthesized oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein, when transferred into cells, result in 100% sequence representation.


De novo oligonucleotide libraries described herein may be subject to amplification reactions with the addition of a polymerase enzyme and amplification reagents (e.g., buffers, phosphates, and dNTPs). In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries are amplified by PCR for at least or about 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, or more than 20 cycles. In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries are amplified by PCR in a range of about 6 to 20, 7 to 18, 8 to 17, 9 to 16, or 10 to 15 cycles. In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries are amplified by PCR for about 15 cycles.


In some instances, amplification of the de novo oligonucleotide libraries provides for an amplicon library of DNA molecules. In some instances, the amplicon library comprises non-identical nucleic acids that encode for a gRNA sequence. In some instances, the gRNA sequence is a sgRNA or a dgRNA.


In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries comprise non-identical nucleic acids, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid comprises DNA molecules. In some instances, the number of DNA molecules is about 500, 2000, 3500 or more molecules. In some instances, the number of DNA molecules is at least or about 250, 500, 1000, 1250, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9500, 10000, 15000, 20000, 50000, 100000, 250000, 500000, 750000, 1 million, or more than 1 million molecules. In some instances, the number of DNA molecules is at most 250, 500, 1000, 1250, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9500, 10000, 15000, 20000, 50000, 100000, 250000, 500000, 750000, 1 million, or more than 1 million molecules. In some instances, the DNA molecule encodes for a gRNA sequence. In some instances, the gRNA sequence is a sgRNA or a dgRNA.


In some instances, the de novo oligonucleotide libraries comprise non-identical nucleic acids, wherein each non-identical nucleic acid comprises RNA molecules. In some instances, the number of RNA molecules is about 2000 molecules. In some instances, the number of RNA molecules is at least or about 250, 500, 1000, 1250, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9500, 10000, 15000, 20000, 50000, 100000, 250000, 500000, 750000, 1 million, or more than 1 million molecules. In some instances, the number of RNA molecules is at most 250, 500, 1000, 1250, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9500, 10000, 15000, 20000, 50000, 100000, 250000, 500000, 750000, 1 million, or more than 1 million molecules. In some instances, the RNA molecule encodes for a gRNA sequence. In some instances, the gRNA sequence is a sgRNA or a dgRNA.


Provided herein are de novo oligonucleotide libraries having high uniformity following amplification. In some instances, more than 80% of oligonucleotides in a de novo oligonucleotide library described herein are represented within at least about 1.5× the mean representation for the entire library following amplification. In some instances, more than 90% of oligonucleotides in a de novo oligonucleotide library described herein are represented within at least about 1.5× the mean representation for the entire library following amplification. In some instances, more than 80% of oligonucleotides in a de novo oligonucleotide library described herein are represented within at least about 2× the mean representation for the entire library following amplification. In some instances, more than 80% of oligonucleotides in a de novo oligonucleotide library described herein are represented within at least about 2× the mean representation for the entire library following amplification.


An unamplified population of oligonucleotides de novo synthesized using methods described herein can vary in a number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is in a range of about 2000-1 million, 3000 to 900000, 4000-800000, 5000-700000, 6000-600000, 7000-500000, 8000-400000, 9000-300000, 10000-200000, 11000-100000, 12000-75000, 14000-60000, and 20000-50000 sequences. In some cases, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is in the range of about 50-2000, 75-1800, 100-1700, 150-1600, 200-1500, 250-1400, 300-1300, 400-1200, 500-1100, 600-1000, 700-900 sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is 2000 sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is more than 1 million sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is at least 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 3000, 5000, 7000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 50000, 100000, 500000, 700000, 1000000, 10000000, 1000000000, or more sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is up to 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 3000, 5000, 7000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 50000, 100000, 500000, 700000, 1000000, or more sequences. In some instances, the number of non-identical oligonucleotide sequences is at most 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 3000, 5000, 7000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 50000, 100000, 500000, 700000, and 1000000 sequences.


An oligonucleotide of an unamplified population may be present in varying amounts. In some instances, an oligonucleotide of an unamplified population is present in an amount of at least or about 0.25 femtomole. In some instances, an oligonucleotide of an unamplified population is present in an amount of at least or about 1 femtomole. In some instances, an oligonucleotide of an unamplified population is present in an amount of at least 0.25, 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, 1000, or more than 1000 femtomoles. In some instances, an oligonucleotide of an unamplified population is present in an amount of at most 0.25, 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 femtomoles.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing libraries of non-identical oligonucleotides, wherein a sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides vary. In some cases, the sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides is up to 150 bases. In some cases, the sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides is in a range of about 100 to about 200 bases. In some instances, the sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides is at least 30, 50, 100, 125, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, or more than 500 bases. In some instances, the sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides is at most 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, or 500 bases. An exemplary sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotide is in a range of about 25 to about 150 or about 50 to about 200 bases. In some cases, the sequence length or average sequence length of the non-identical oligonucleotides is in the range of about 125 to about 200 or about 150 to about 200 bases.


Guide RNA Sequences


Provided herein are single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences for directing a genomic sequence editing enzyme (e.g., Cas9) to a particular target nucleic acid sequence. An example sgRNA in complex with a Cas9 enzyme is illustrated in FIG. 4A, and an example alone in FIG. 4B. The gRNA may be a dual guide RNA, as illustrated in FIG. 4C. Guide sequences disclosed herein comprises a base-pairing region. The base-pairing region comprises a seed region for binding to a target sequence and, optionally, a spacer region. The base-pairing region may vary in length. For example, the base-pairing region may comprise about 1 to 10, 1 to 20, 20 to 25, or 1 to 30 bases in length. In some instance, the base-pairing region comprises at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or more bases in length. In some instances, the base-pairing region comprises a seed region of at least 10 bases in length. The seed region may comprise about 8 to 20 bases in length. In some instances, the seed region is about 12 bases in length. In some instances, a base-pairing region described herein is designed to target a template strand during transcription, FIG. 5A. In some instances, a base-pairing region described herein is designed to target a non-template strand during transcription, FIG. 5B.


In some instances, 3′ of the base-pairing region of a sgRNA is a Cas9 handle region for binding to Cas9. In some instances, the Cas9 handle region is a dCas9 handle region for binding to a dCas9 enzyme. The handle region may vary in length. For example, the handle region may comprise about 1 to 50, 20 to 45, or 15 to 60 bases in length. In some instance, the handle region comprises at least 35, 40, 45, 50 or more bases in length. The handle region may comprise about 42 bases in length.


In some instances, 3′ of the handle region of the sgRNA is a terminator region. In some instances, the terminator region is a S. pyogenes terminator region. In some instances, the terminator region comprises at about 40 bases in length. In some instances, the terminator region comprises about 10 to 50, 20 to 60, or 30 to 55 bases in length.


Design schemes for gRNA sequences described herein may comprise inclusion of a DNA dependent RNA polymerase promoter region 5′ upstream of DNA encoding for the gRNA sequence. Exemplary DNA dependent RNA polymerase promoter regions include, without limitation a T3 and a T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence. For example, FIG. 6A illustrates an arrangement where a T7 promoter region is 5′ upstream of a gRNA and the resultant gRNA transcribed is produced wherein the gRNA includes hairpins. In some arrangements, a gRNA is designed to lack a sequence that forms a hairpin secondary structure, FIG. 6B. The hairpin secondary structure may be lacking in the Cas9 handle and/or the terminator region.


Provided herein are dgRNAs for directing a genomic sequence editing enzyme (e.g., Cas9) to a particular target nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, libraries comprise nucleic acid sequences that encode sequences for dgRNAs. In some instances, the libraries comprise nucleic acids, wherein each nucleic acid synthesized is a DNA sequence that encodes for a dgRNA sequence as a transcription product. In some instances, the libraries comprise nucleic acids, wherein each nucleic acid synthesized is a RNA sequence and the dgRNA itself is synthesized. In some instances, libraries of dgRNAs comprise nucleic acid sequences for crRNA and tracrRNA that are synthesized as separate nucleic acids. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode for crRNA and tracrRNA separately. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode for single sequence that when transcribed result in a separate crRNA sequence and a separate tracrRNA sequence. Exemplary sequences for crRNA and tracrRNA are seen in Table 1.











TABLE 1





SEQ




ID




NO
Name
Sequence







5
crRNA-
5′ATAACTCAATTTGTAAAAAAGTTTTAGAGCTAT



sp2
GCTGTTTTG3′





6
tracrRNA
5′GGAACCATTCAAAACAGCATAGCAAGTTAAAA




TAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGC




ACCGAGTCGGTGCTTTTTTT3′









gRNA libraries described herein may be used for in vitro screening and analysis. An illustration of such an arrangement is depicted in FIG. 7, where a target double-stranded DNA sequence is incubated with a gRNA sequence and Cas9 enzyme. The mixture results in a double strand DNA break. The DNA break may result in a measureable change in the function or expression of a genomic element. gRNAs described herein, or DNA encoding for gRNAs, may be added to cells via various methods known in the art, including, without limitation, transfection, transduction, or electroporation.


In some instances, gRNA libraries described herein are used for in vivo or ex vivo screening and analysis. Cells for screening include primary cells taken from living subjects or cell lines. Cells may be from prokaryotes (e.g., bacteria and fungi) or eukaryotes (e.g., animals and plants). Exemplary animal cells include, without limitation, those from a mouse, rabbit, primate, and insect. In some instances, gRNA libraries described herein may also be delivered to a multicellular organism. Exemplary multicellular organisms include, without limitation, a plant, a mouse, rabbit, primate, and insect.


Genome Engineering


Provided herein are libraries comprising nucleic acids for nuclease targeting of a particular target nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, libraries described herein comprise synthesized nucleic acids, wherein the nucleic acids is DNA, RNA, any analogs, or derivatives thereof. In some instances, the target nucleic acid sequence comprises DNA, RNA, any analogs, or derivatives thereof. In some instances, the nuclease cleaves the target nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the nuclease binds the target nucleic acid but does not cleave it. Types of nucleases include, but are not limited to, Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease (TALEN), zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), meganuclease, Argonaute, and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) protein. In some instances, the nuclease is wild-type, genetically modified, or recombinant.


A model system for targeted gene editing comprises a Cas9-based approach. When expressed or transferred into cells alongside a gRNA, Cas9 allows for the targeted introduction or deletion of genetic information via a complex with a Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) sequence of mRNA. A Cas9 complex, as illustrated in FIGS. 1A-1B, includes a Cas9 protein, engaged with a guide RNA (“gRNA”) transcript. The illustrated gRNA contains a target sequence region, a PAM region, and a hairpin region. In a CRISPR/Cas9 process, a gRNA shepherds the Cas9 enzyme to a specific stretch of DNA. While the gRNA depicted is a sgRNA (single stranded guide RNA), the complex may be formed with a dgRNA (dual stranded guide RNA). Cas9 then cleaves the DNA to disable or repair a gene. A non-limiting list of exemplary modifications to this process is described here. In a CRISPR/dCas9 process, a disabled or “dead” Cas9 (“dCas9”) no longer has a splicing function but, with the addition of another enzymatic activity, performs a different target molecule modifying function. For example, tethering a cytidine deaminase to dCas9 converts a C-G DNA base pair into T-A base pair. In an alternative dCas9 process, a different enzyme tethered to the dCas9 results in changing the base C into a T, or a G to an A in a target DNA. Alternatively, the dCas9 process can be modified by fusion of transcription factors to block or activate RNA polymerase activity, resulting in turning off (CRISPRi) or turning on (CRISPRa) gene transcription and therefore regulate gene expression. For example, the dCas9 process is modified by fusion with a transcriptional repressor. In some instances, the dCas9 process is modified by fusion with a transcriptional activator. In some instances, the dCas9 process is modified by fusion with a plurality of transcriptional repressors or transcriptional activators. In alternative arrangements, a gRNA has multiple sites for cleavage, resulting in a gRNA having multiple regions for gene editing. In the case of Cas9n, or “nicking Cas9,” either the RuvC or HNH cleavage domain is modified to be inactive. This inactivation leaves Cas9 only able to produce only a stranded break in the DNA (a nick), not a double stranded break. In some arrangements, two Cas9n enzymes, one for each strand, are used to produce the double stranded break. As they can recognize both the upstream and downstream regions of the cut site, off target effects are ablated. In the case of hfCas9, instead of using dual Cas9n proteins to generate the off-target effect-free Cas9 cut, a modified Cas9 enzyme has relaxed binding target specificity stringency to allow for less than perfect matches prior to enzymatic activity. In some instances, the dCas9 process is modified by fusion with a label or tag for detecting a target nucleic acid. For example, the label is a fluorescent marker (e.g., GFP) for detecting the target nucleic acid. In some instances, the dCas9 is fused to an epitope tag and is used for purification of the target nucleic acid specified by a gRNA.


Provided herein are libraries comprising nucleic acids for directing a nuclease to a particular target nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the target nucleic acid sequence comprises DNA. In some instances, the target nucleic acid sequence comprises RNA. For example, libraries comprising nucleic acids for directing C2c2 are generated for targeting a RNA sequence. In some instances, the DNA or RNA is single stranded or double stranded.


Provided herein are libraries comprising nucleic acids for nuclease targeting of a particular target nucleic acid sequence, wherein the nuclease is from a species of, but not limited to, Streptococcus, Campylobacter, Nitratifractor, Staphylococcus, Parvibaculum, Roseburia, Neisseria, Gluconacetobacter, Azospirillum, Sphaerochaeta, Lactobacillus, Eubacterium, Corynebacter, Carnobacterium, Rhodobacter, Listeria, Paludibacter, Clostridium, Lachnospiraceae, Clostridiaridium, Leptotrichia, Francisella, Legionella, Alicyclobacillus, Methanomethyophilus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, Bacteroidetes, Helcococcus, Letospira, Desulfovibrio, Desulfonatronum, Desulfurococcus, Opitutaceae, Tuberibacillus, Bacillus, Brevibacilus, Methylobacterium, Natronobacterium, Flavobacterium, Saccharomyces, Chlamydomonas, Thermus, Pyrococcus, Mycoplasma, or Acidaminococcus. Exemplary nucleases are listed in Table 2A. gRNAs described herein may bind to the terminator sequence of a nuclease from any of the species listed above, or nucleases from additional species where the enzyme allows for genome editing functions. Exemplary terminator sequences include, without limitation, those listed in Table 2B. Exemplary PAM sequences include, without limitation, those listed in Table 2C.













TABLE 2A







Name
Accession Number
Species









Cas9
Q99ZW2

Streptococcus pyogenes




Cas9
J7RUA5

Staphylococcus aureus




Cas9
G3ECR1

Streptococcus thermophilus




C2c2
P0DOC6

Leptotrichia shahii




Cpf1
U2UMQ6

Acidaminococcus sp.




C2c1
T0D7A2

Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris




FokI
P14870

Flavobacterium okeanokoites




AciI
A0A0C5GQT3

Lactobacillus acidophilus




I-Scel
P03882

Saccharomyces cerevisiae




I-CreI
P05725

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii




I-DmoI
1B24_A

Desulfurococcus mobilis




TtAgo
Q746M7

Thermus thermophilus




PfAgo
Q8U3D2

Pyrococcus furiosus




NgAgo
A0A172MAH6

Natronobacterium gregoryi




















TABLE 2B





SEQ




ID




NO
Species
Sequence







 7

Streptococcus

5′ TACTCAACTTGAAAAGGTGG




thermophilus

CACCGATTCGGTGTTTTT 3′





 8

Streptococcus

5′ TACACAACTTGAAAAAGTGC




mutans

GCACCGATTCGGTGCTTTT 3′





 9

Listeria innocua

5′ TTATCAACTTTTAATTAAGT




AGCGCTGTTTCGGCGCTTTT 3′





10

Mycoplasma

5′




mobile

TATGCCGTAACTACTACTTATTTT




CAAAATAAGTAGTTTT 3′





11

Campylobacter

5′ GACTCTGCGGGGTTACAATCC




jejuni

CCTAAAACCGCTTTT 3′

















TABLE 2C





Species/Variant of Cas9
PAM Sequence








Streptococcus pyogenes/SpCas9

NGG



Streptococcus pyogenes/SpCas9 D1135E

NGG


variant



Streptococcus pyogenes/SpCas9 VRER variant

NGCG



Streptococcus pyogenes/SpCas9 EQR variant

NGAG



Streptococcus pyogenes/SpCas9 VQR variant

NGAN or NGNG



Staphylococcus aureus/SaCas9

NNGRRT or NNGRR(N)



Neisseria meningitidis

NNNNGATT



Streptococcus thermophilus

NNAGAAW



Treponema denticola

NAAAAC









Provided herein are libraries comprising nucleic acids for targeting one or more nuclease(s) to a particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the nuclease is at least one of TALEN, ZFN, meganuclease, Argonaute, and Cas protein. For example, more than one nuclease can be multiplexed to generate large genomic deletions, modify multiple sequences at once, or be used in conjunction with other enzymes such as a nickase. In some instances, the number of nucleases is at least 2 nucleases for the target nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the number of nucleases is in a range of about 2 to 3, 2 to 4, 2 to 5, 2 to 6, 2 to 7, 2 to 8, 2 to 9, or 2 to 10 nucleases for the target nucleic acid sequence.


Provided herein are libraries comprising synthesized nucleic acids for nickase targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. A nickase is an enzyme that generates a single stranded break in a nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids are DNA, RNA, any analogs, or derivatives thereof. In some instances, the particular nucleic acid sequence comprises DNA, RNA, any analogs, or derivatives thereof. In some instances, the nickase cleaves the particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the nickase binds the particular nucleic acid but does not cleave it. In some instances, the nickase is an altered nuclease, wherein the nuclease is TALEN, ZFN, meganuclease, Argonaute, or Cas protein. In some instances, the nickase is generated by altering a nuclease domain of TALEN, ZFN, meganuclease, Argonaute, or Cas protein. In some instances, the nickase is generated by altering the nuclease domain of Cas9.


In some instances, libraries comprise nucleic acids for one or more nickase(s) targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the number of nickases is at least 2 nickases for the particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the number of nickases is in a range of about 2 to 3, 2 to 4, 2 to 5, 2 to 6, 2 to 7, 2 to 8, 2 to 9, or 2 to 10 nickases for the particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, libraries comprise nucleic acids for directing one or more nickase and one or more nuclease to the particular nucleic acid sequence.


Libraries comprising nucleic acids for targeting a nuclease to a particular nucleic acid sequence provided herein can result in cleavage of the particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the nuclease is at least one of TALEN, ZFN, meganuclease, Argonaute, and Cas protein. In some instances, the nuclease is a chimeric nuclease that provides for a modification of the particular nucleic acid sequence other than cleavage. For example, the chimeric nuclease results in methylation, demethylation, polyadenylation, deadenylation, deamination, or polyuridinylation.


Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids for Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease (TALEN) targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. TALENs are a class of engineered sequence-specific nucleases that can be used to induce double-strand breaks at specific target sequences. TALENs can be generated by fusing transcription activator-like (TAL) effector DNA-binding domain, or a functional part thereof, to the catalytic domain of a nuclease. The TAL effector DNA binding domain comprises a series of TAL repeats, which are generally highly conserved 33 or 34 amino acid sequence segments that each comprise a highly variable 12th and 13th amino acid known as the repeat variable diresidue (RVD). Each RVD can recognize and bind to a specific nucleotide. Thus, a TAL effector binding domain can be engineered to recognize a specific sequence of nucleotides by combining TAL repeats comprising the appropriate RVDs.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a nucleic acid library comprising non-identical nucleic acids that encode for a TAL effector DNA-binding domain. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain is designed to recognize a particular target nucleic acid sequence and induce double-stranded breaks at a particular site. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain comprises a number of TAL repeats that are designed to recognize and bind to a particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the number of TAL repeats is at least or about 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, or more TAL repeats.


In some instances, a nucleic acid library comprising non-identical nucleic acids encoding for TAL effector DNA-binding domain are synthesized. In some instances, the nucleic acid library as described herein that when translated encodes for a protein library. In some instances, the nucleic acid library is expressed in cells and a protein library is generated. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids that encode for a TAL effector DNA-binding domain generated by methods described herein can be used for generating a TALEN. In some instances, this is accomplished by mixing the TAL effector binding domain library that is cloned and expressed in vectors with a nuclease. Exemplary nucleases include, but are not limited to, AciI, AcuI, AlwI, BbvI, BccI, BceAI, BciVI, BfuAI, BmgBI, BmrI, Bpml, BpuEI, BsaI, BsmAI, BsmFI, BseRI, BspCNI, BsrI, BsgI, BsmI, BspMI, BsrBI, BsrDI, BtgZI, BtsI, BtsCI, EarI, EciI, FokI, HgaI, HphI, HpyAV, MboII, MlyI, MmeI, MnlI, NmeAIII, PleI, SfaNI, BbvCI, Bpul0I, BspQI, SapI, BaeI, BsaXI, or CspCI. In some instances, mixing occurs by ligation. Exemplary ligases, included, but are not limited to, E. coli ligase, T4 ligase, mammalian ligases (e.g., DNA ligase I, DNA ligase II, DNA ligase III, DNA ligase IV), thermostable ligases, and fast ligases. TALENs generated by methods described herein can be inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, TALENs are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a TAL effector DNA-binding domain library comprising non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene in a genome of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain library comprise non-identical nucleic acid sequences for one or more genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes for at least 5% of the genome.


Zinc Finger Nucleases


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids for Zinc Finger Nuclease (ZFN) targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. ZFNs can be generated by fusion of a nuclease with a DNA binding zinc finger domain (ZFD). The ZFD can bind to a target nucleic acid sequence through one or more zinc fingers. In some instances, the ZFD comprises at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more zinc fingers. In some instances, the ZFD comprises at most 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more zinc fingers. In some instances, the ZFD is designed to recognize a particular target nucleic acid sequence and induce double-stranded breaks at a particular site.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a nucleic acid library comprising nucleic acids that when transcribed and translated encode for a ZFD. In some instances, when the nucleic acid library is translated encode for a protein library. In some instances, the nucleic acid library is expressed in cells and a protein library is generated. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids that encode for a ZFD generated by methods described herein can be used for generating a ZFN. In some instances, this is accomplished by mixing the ZFD that is cloned and expressed in vectors with a nuclease. Exemplary nucleases include, but are not limited to, AciI, AcuI, AlwI, BbvI, BccI, BceAI, BciVI, BfuAI, BmgBI, BmrI, Bpml, BpuEI, BsaI, BsmAI, BsmFI, BseRI, BspCNI, BsrI, BsgI, BsmI, BspMI, BsrBI, BsrDI, BtgZI, BtsI, BtsCI, EarI, EciI, FokI, HgaI, HphI, HpyAV, MboII, MlyI, MmeI, MnlI, NmeAIII, PleI, SfaNI, BbvCI, Bpul0I, BspQI, SapI, BaeI, BsaXI, or CspCI. In some instances, mixing occurs by ligation. Exemplary ligases, included, but are not limited to, E. coli ligase, T4 ligase, mammalian ligases (e.g., DNA ligase I, DNA ligase II, DNA ligase III, DNA ligase IV), thermostable ligases, and fast ligases. ZFNs generated by methods described herein can be inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, ZFNs are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a ZFD library comprising non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene in a genome of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. In some instances, the ZFD library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the ZFD library comprise non-identical nucleic acid sequences for one or more genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the ZFD library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the ZFD library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes for at least 5% of the genome.


Meganucleases


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids for meganuclease targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. Meganucleases are enzymes that can recognize and cleave long base pair (e.g., 12-40 base pairs) DNA targets. In some instances, meganucleases are engineered to comprise domains of other enzymes to confer specificity for a target nucleic acid sequence. For example, meganucleases are engineered to comprise a TAL effector DNA binding domain.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a nucleic acid library comprising nucleic acids that when transcribed and translated encode for a binding domain for use with a meganuclease. In some instances, when the nucleic acid library is translated encode for a protein library. In some instances, the nucleic acid library is expressed in cells and a protein library is generated. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, the synthesized nucleic acids libraries are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids that encode for a domain generated by methods described herein can be used for engineering a meganuclease for targeting a particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, this is accomplished by mixing a binding domain library such as a TAL effector binding domain library that is cloned and expressed in vectors with a meganuclease. Exemplary meganucleases for use with the methods provided herein include, but are not limited to, I-Scel, I-Scell, I-SceIII, I-SceIV, I-SceV, I-SceVI, I-SceVII, I-Ceul, I-CeuAIIP, I-Crel, I-CrepsbIP, I-CrepsbllP, I-CrepsbIIIP, I-CrepsbIVP, I-Tlil, I-Ppol, PI-PspI, F-Scel, F-Scell, F-Suvl, F-TevI, F-TevII, I-Amal, I-Anil, I-Chul, I-Cmoel, I-Cpal, I-CpaII, I-Csml, I-Cvul, I-CvuAIP, I-Ddil, I-DdiII, I-Dirl, I-Dmol, I-Hmul, I-HmuII, I-HsNIP, I-Llal, I-Msol, I-Naal, I-Nanl, I-NcIIP, I-NgrIP, I-Nitl, I-Njal, I-Nsp236IP, I-Pakl, I-PboIP, I-PcuIP, I-PcuAI, I-PcuVI, I-PgrlP, 1-PobIP, I-Porl, I-PorIIP, I-PbpIP, I-SpBetaIP, I-Scal, I-SexIP, 1-SneIP, I-Spoml, I-SpomCP, I-SpomIP, I-SpomIIP, I-SquIP, I-Ssp6803I, I-SthPhiJP, I-SthPhiST3P, I-SthPhiSTe3bP, I-TdeIP, I-Tevl, I-TevII, I-TevIII, I-UarAP, I-UarHGPAIP, I-UarHGPA13P, I-VinIP, 1-ZbiIP, PI-MtuI, PI-MtuHIP PI-MtuHIIP, PI-PfuI, PI-PfuII, PI-PkoI, PI-PkoII, PI-Rma43812IP, PI-SpBetaIP, PI-SceI, PI-TfuI, PI-TfuII, PI-Thyl, PI-Tlil, PI-TliII, or fragments thereof. In some instances, mixing occurs by ligation. Exemplary ligases, included, but are not limited to, E. coli ligase, T4 ligase, mammalian ligases (e.g., DNA ligase I, DNA ligase II, DNA ligase III, DNA ligase IV), thermostable ligases, and fast ligases. Engineered meganucleases generated by methods described herein can be inserted into expression vectors. In some instances, the engineered meganucleases are inserted into expression vectors and expressed in cells.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a binding domain library for use with a meganuclease comprising non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene in a genome of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. In some instances, the domain library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the domain library comprise non-identical nucleic acid sequences for one or more genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the domain library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the domain library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes for at least 5% of the genome.


Argonautes


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids for Argonaute targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. Argonautes are a family of RNA or DNA guided nucleases. In some instances, Argonautes use a guide nucleic acid to identify a target nucleic acid. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid is a single guide RNA (sgRNA). In some instances, the guide nucleic acid is a guide DNA (gDNA). Exemplary Argonautes include, but are not limited to, TtAgo, PfAgo, and NgAgo. In some embodiments, the Argonaute is NgAgo.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a guide nucleic acid library comprising non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene in a genome of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library is a sgRNA library. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library is a dgRNA library. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library comprise non-identical nucleic acid sequences for one or more genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the guide nucleic acid library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes for at least 5% of the genome.


CRISPR-Associated Proteins


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing nucleic acid libraries comprising nucleic acids encoding for gRNAs for CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein targeting of a particular nucleic acid sequence. In some instances, the Cas protein is at least one of Cpf1, C2c1, C2c2, Cas1, Cas1B, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9 (Csn1 or Csx12), Cas10, Csy1, Csy2, Csy3, Cse1, Cse2, Csc1, Csc2, Csa5, Csn2, Csm2, Csm3, Csm4, Csm5, Csm6, Cmr1, Cmr3, Cmr4, Cmr5, Cmr6, Csb1, Csb2, Csb3, Csx17, Csx14, Csx10, Csx16, CsaX, Csx3, Csx1, Csx15, Csf1, Csf2, Csf3, Csf4, homologues thereof, and modified versions thereof. In some instances, the Cas protein is Cas9.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing a gRNA library comprising non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene in a genome of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 non-identical nucleic acid sequences for a gene for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprise non-identical nucleic acid sequences for one or more genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more than 100 genes for at least 5% of the genome. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical nucleic acid sequence for about 1-100, 2-95, 5-90, 10-85, 15-80, 20-75, 25-70, 30-65, 35-60, or 40-50 genes for at least 5% of the genome. The gRNA library may encode for sgRNA or dgRNAs.


Variant Library Synthesis


Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a variant nucleic acid library generated by combination of nucleic acids encoding complete or partial gene sequence with gRNAs and a nuclease, e.g., Cas9 enzyme or Cas9 variant enzyme. The fragments may collectively space the entire region of a gene. In some cases, the library encodes DNA or RNA. In some cases, the library encodes for a single gene or for up to an entire genome. For example, a gRNA library encoding for 5 gRNAs per a gene for a genome comprising about 20,000 genes would result in about 100,000 gRNAs. Such a library can be used to selectively silence or modify a single gene, a pathway of genes, or all genes in a single genome. In some arrangement, gRNAs lack a homology sequence and random end joining occurs. Such a process results in non-homologous end joining (“NHEJ”). In some instances, following NHEJ, an insertion, a deletion, a frameshift, or single base swapping occurs. See FIG. 1B.


Synthesized libraries described herein may be used for application in CRISPR-Cas9 functions, wherein the gRNA sequence generated is used to disrupt expression of or alter the expression product sequence of a target DNA sequence in a cell or in a mixture comprising a target DNA and Cas9 enzyme. In some embodiments, each variant encodes for a codon resulting in a different amino acid during translation. Table 3 provides a listing of each codon possible (and the representative amino acid) for a variant site.









TABLE 3







List of codons and amino acids











One
Three




letter
letter



Amino Acids
code
code
Codons
















Alanine
A
Ala
GCA
GCC
GCG
GCT











Cysteine
C
Cys
TGC
TGT


Aspartic acid
D
Asp
GAC
GAT


Glutamic acid
E
Glu
GAA
GAG


Phenylalanine
F
Phe
TTC
TTT













Glycine
G
Gly
GGA
GGC
GGG
GGT











Histidine
H
His
CAC
CAT












Isoleucine
I
Iso
ATA
ATC
ATT











Lysine
K
Lys
AAA
AAG















Leucine
L
Leu
TTA
TTG
CTA
CTC
CTG
CTT










Methionine
M
Met
ATG











Asparagine
N
Asn
AAC
AAT













Proline
P
Pro
CCA
CCC
CCG
CCT











Glutamine
Q
Gln
CAA
CAG















Arginine
R
Arg
AGA
AGG
CGA
CGC
CGG
CGT


Serine
S
Ser
AGC
AGT
TCA
TCC
TCG
TCT













Threonine
T
Thr
ACA
ACC
ACG
ACT


Valine
V
Val
GTA
GTC
GTG
GTT










Tryptophan
W
Trp
TGG











Tyrosine
Y
Tyr
TAC
TAT









Provided herein are methods for synthesis of a variant nucleic acid library generated by combination of nucleic acids encoding complete or partial gene sequence with a nuclease, wherein the nuclease is TALEN, ZFN, or an engineered meganuclease. In some instances, methods for synthesis of a variant nucleic acid library generated by combination of nucleic acids encoding complete or partial gene sequence with guide nucleic acids such as sgRNAs with a nuclease, wherein the nuclease is Argonaute or a Cas protein. Synthesized libraries described herein may be used for application in nuclease functions, wherein the nucleic acid sequence generated is used to disrupt expression of or alter the expression product sequence of a target DNA sequence in a cell or in a mixture comprising a target DNA and a nuclease. In some embodiments, each variant encodes for a codon resulting in a different amino acid during translation.


Variant nucleic acid libraries as described herein may comprise sgRNAs or dgRNAs for varying a target nucleic acid sequence encoding in at least a single codon such that a plurality of different variants of a single residue in the subsequent protein encoded by the synthesized nucleic acid are generated by standard translation processes. In some instances, each variant encodes for a codon resulting in a different amino acid of a protein domain. For example, the protein domain is a conserved domain or catalytic domain. In some embodiments, the protein domain is, but not limited to, a kinase domain, an ATP-binding domain, a GTP-binding domain, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) domain, a GTPase activating protein (GAP) domain, a hydrolase domain, an endonuclease domain, an exonuclease domain, a protease domain, a phosphatase domain, a phospholipase domain, a pleckstrin homology domain, a Src homology domain, and a ubiquitin-binding domain. In some instances, the variant nucleic acid libraries comprise sgRNAs or dgRNAs for targeting a nucleic acid sequence that encodes for variation in at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 protein domains.


In some embodiments, the variants encode for amino acids for a protein with particular activity. For example, the variants encode for a protein that comprises methyltransferase activity, demethylase activity, dismutase activity, alkylation activity, depurination activity, oxidation activity, pyrimidine dimer forming activity, integrase activity, transposase activity, recombinase activity, polymerase activity, ligase activity, helicase activity, photolyase activity, glycosylase activity, acetyltransferase activity, deacetylase activity, kinase activity, phosphatase activity, ubiquitin ligase activity, deubiquitinating activity, adenylation activity, deadenylation activity, SUMOylating activity, deSUMOylating activity, ribosylation activity, deribosylation activity, myristoylation activity, remodelling activity, protease activity, oxidoreductase activity, transferase activity, hydrolase activity, lyase activity, isomerase activity, synthase activity, synthetase activity, or demyristoylation activity.


Variation Generated by Homology-Directed Repair (HDR)


In an exemplary process for variant nucleic acid library generation, Cas9 cleavage and homologous recombination are incorporated to generate variety in a target DNA library. First, a library of gRNA is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription (in vivo or in vitro) to generate gRNA), wherein the library comprises a plurality of gRNA molecules per a gene. For example, the gRNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more gRNAs per a gene. The gRNA library is mixed with a Cas9 enzyme and a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism. Also added to the mixture are replacement sequences which comprise a homology sequence and a variant nucleic acid sequence such that variation is introduced into target DNA strands. The resultant target DNA library will comprise a plurality of variant DNA sequences. In some instances, variation introduces a deletion, frame shift, or insertion into target DNA sequence. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one codon per a gene or gene fragment. In some instances, a portion of a gene is inserted into the target DNA or, alternatively, a portion of a target DNA sequence (i.e. a fragment of a gene or an entire gene) is removed from the target DNA. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one transcription regulatory sequence, e.g., a promoter, UTR, or terminator sequence, associated with gene or gene fragment.


In some instances for variant nucleic acid library generation, nuclease cleavage and homologous recombination are incorporated to generate variety in a target DNA library, wherein the nuclease is a TALEN, a ZFN, a meganuclease, a Cas, or an Argonaute. In some instances, where the nuclease is TALEN, a library of TAL effector DNA-binding domains is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription and translation (in vivo or in vitro)), wherein the library comprises a plurality of TAL effector DNA-binding domain molecules per a gene. For example, the TAL effector DNA-binding domain library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more TAL effector DNA-binding domain molecules per a gene. The TAL effector DNA-binding domain library can then be mixed with a nuclease enzyme to generate a TALEN. In some instances, the TALEN is combined with a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism. In some instances, also added to the mixture are replacement sequences which comprise a homology sequence and a variant nucleic acid sequence such that variation is introduced into target DNA strands. The resultant target DNA library will comprise a plurality of variant DNA sequences. In some instances, variation introduces a deletion, frame shift, or insertion into target DNA sequence. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one codon per a gene or gene fragment. In some instances, a portion of a gene is inserted into the target DNA or, alternatively, a portion of a target DNA sequence (i.e. a fragment of a gene or an entire gene) is removed from the target DNA. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one transcription regulatory sequence, e.g., a promoter, UTR, or terminator sequence, associated with gene or gene fragment.


Variation Generated by Modified Cas9 Enzymes


In a second exemplary process for variant nucleic acid library generation, modified Cas9 enzymes are incorporated to generate a variant target DNA library. First, a library of gRNA is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription to generate gRNA), wherein the library comprises a plurality of gRNA molecules per a gene. For example, the gRNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more gRNAs per a gene. The gRNA library is mixed with a modified Cas9 enzyme and a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism. The modified Cas9 enzyme has tethered to it another enzyme with nucleic acid sequence modification capabilities. An exemplary modified Cas9 enzymes includes dCas9 process in which a disabled or “dead” Cas9 (“dCas9”) no longer has a splicing function but, with the addition of another enzymatic activity, performs a different target molecule modifying function. For example, tethering a cytidine deaminase to dCas9 converts a C-G DNA base pair into T-A base pair. In an alternative dCas9 process, a different enzyme tethered to the dCas9 results in changing the base C into a T, or a G to an A in a target DNA. The resultant target DNA library comprises a plurality of variant target DNA sequences. In some instances, variation introduces a deletion, frame shift, or insertion into target DNA sequence. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one codon per a gene or gene fragment. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one transcription regulatory sequence, e.g., a promoter, UTR, or terminator sequence, associated with gene or gene fragment.


Variation Generated by Modified Nucleases


Provided herein are methods for variant nucleic acid library generation comprising a modified nuclease enzyme that is incorporated to generate a variant target DNA library. In some instances, the nuclease is TALEN. In some instances, a TAL effector DNA binding domain library is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription and translation to generate the TAL effector DNA binding domain library), wherein the library comprises a plurality of non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. For example, the TAL effector DNA binding domain library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. The TAL effector DNA-binding domain library can then be mixed with a nuclease enzyme to generate a TALEN. In some instances, the TALEN is then mixed with a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism.


In some instances, the nuclease is ZFN. In some instances, a ZFD library is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription and translation to generate the ZFD library), wherein the library comprises a plurality of non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. For example, the ZFD library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. The ZFD library can then be mixed with a nuclease enzyme to generate a ZFN. In some instances, the ZFN is then mixed with a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism.


In some instances, the nuclease is a meganuclease. In some instances, a binding domain library such as a TAL effector DNA binding domain library for targeting the meganuclease to a particular nucleic acid sequence is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription to generate the binding domain library), wherein the binding domain library comprises a plurality of non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. For example, the binding domain library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. The binding domain library can then be mixed a meganuclease enzyme to generate an engineered meganuclease. In some instances, the engineered meganuclease is then mixed with a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism.


In some instances, the nuclease is Argonaute. In some instances, a guide nucleic acid library (gRNA or gDNA) is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription to generate the guide nucleic acid library), wherein the guide nucleic acid library comprises a plurality of non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. For example, the guide nucleic acid library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more non-identical nucleic acid sequences per a gene. The guide nucleic acid library is mixed with a modified Argonaute enzyme and a target DNA library, where the target DNA library comprises nucleic acid sequence encoding for at least one gene fragment or at least one gene. For example, the target DNA library may comprise 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more genes or gene fragments. In some instances, the target DNA library comprises sequence from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism.


In some instances, the modified nuclease enzyme has tethered to it another enzyme with nucleic acid sequence modification capabilities. Exemplary modification capabilities include, but are not limited to, methylation, demethylation, polyadenylation, deadenylation, deamination, and polyuridinylation. In some instances, a target DNA library comprising a plurality of variant target DNA sequences results in variation. In some instances, variation introduces a deletion, frame shift, or insertion into target DNA sequence. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one codon per a gene or gene fragment. In some instances, the variant DNA sequences result in variation for at least one transcription regulatory sequence, e.g., a promoter, UTR, or terminator sequence, associated with gene or gene fragment.


gRNA Library Synthesis for Targeting Genes of a Model System


Provided herein are methods for screening model systems with a nucleic acid library described herein. In some instances, the nucleic acid library is a gRNA library described herein. In some instances, the nucleic acid library is a DNA library described herein, that when transcribed results in transcription of gRNA sequences. A non-limiting exemplary list of model organisms is provided in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Organisms and Gene Number










Model System
Protein Coding Genes*














Arabidopsis thaliana

27000




Caenorhabditis elegans

20000




Canis lupus familiaris

19000




Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

14000




Danio rerio

26000




Dictyostelium discoideum

13000




Drosophila melanogaster

14000




Escherichia coli

4300




Macaca mulatta

22000




Mus musculus

20000




Oryctolagus cuniculus

27000




Rattus norvegicus

22000




Saccharomyces cerevisiae

6600




Sus scrofa

21000




Homo sapiens

21000





*Numbers here reflect the number of protein coding genes and excludes tRNA and non-coding RNA. Ron Milo & Rob Phillips, Cell Biology by the Numbers 286 (2015).






A library of gRNAs is synthesized (either by de novo synthesis of RNA or de novo synthesis of DNA followed by transcription to generate gRNAs), wherein the library comprises a plurality of gRNA molecules per a gene. For example, a library described herein may comprises 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more gRNAs per a gene. In some instances, the nucleic acids within a de novo synthesized library encode sequences for at least or about 3 non-identical gRNAs per a single gene. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode sequences in a range of about 1 to about 10 non-identical gRNAs per a single gene. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode sequences for at least or about 1 non-identical gRNAs per a single gene. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode sequences for at most 10 non-identical gRNAs per a single gene. In some instances, the nucleic acids encode sequences for 1 to 2, 1 to 3, 1 to 4, 1 to 5, 1 to 6, 1 to 7, 1 to 8, 1 to 9, or 1 to 10 non-identical gRNAs per a single gene. In some instances, the gRNAs are sgRNAs. In some instances, the gRNAs are dgRNAs.


In some instances, a gRNA library described herein comprises one or more non-identical gRNAs per a gene of an organism. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more non-identical gRNAs per a gene for the organism. Exemplary organisms include, without limitation, Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Canis lupus familiaris, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Danio rerio, Dictyostelium discoideum, Drosophila melanogaster, Escherichia coli, Macaca mulatta, Mus musculus, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Rattus norvegicus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sus scrofa, and Homo sapiens. In some instances, the gRNAs are sgRNAs. In some instances, the gRNAs are dgRNAs. In some cases, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for at least or about 5% of the entire genome of the organism. In some cases, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for about 5% to about 100% of the entire genome of the organism. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for at least or about 80% of the entire genome of the organism. In some instances, the sgRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for at least or about 90% of the entire genome of the organism. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for at least or about 95% of the entire genome of the organism. In some cases, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for at least or about 100% of the entire genome of the organism. In some cases, the gRNA library comprises non-identical gRNAs for about 5% to 10%, 5% to 20%, 5% to 30%, 5% to 40%, 5% to 50%, 5% to 60%, 5% to 70%, 5% to 80%, 5% to 90%, 5% to 95%, 5% to 100%, 10% to 20%, 10% to 30%, 10% to 40%, 10% to 50%, 10% to 60%, 10% to 70%, 10% to 80%, 10% to 90%, 10% to 95%, 10% to 100%, 20% to 30%, 20% to 40%, 20% to 50%, 20% to 60%, 20% to 70%, 20% to 80%, 20% to 90%, 20% to 95%, 20% to 100%, 30% to 40%, 30% to 50%, 30% to 60%, 30% to 70%, 30% to 80%, 30% to 90%, 30% to 95%, 30% to 100%, 40% to 50%, 40% to 60%, 40% to 70%, 40% to 80%, 40% to 90%, 40% to 95%, 40% to 100%, 50% to 60%, 50% to 70%, 50% to 80%, 50% to 90%, 50% to 95%, 50% to 100%, 60% to 70%, 60% to 80%, 60% to 90%, 60% to 95%, 60% to 100%, 70% to 80%, 70% to 90%, 70% to 95%, 70% to 100%, 80% to 90%, 80% to 95%, 80% to 100%, 90% to 95%, 90% to 100%, or 95% to 100% of the entire genome of the organism. In some instances, the gRNA library comprises sequences from multiple genes in a pathway or from all genes in an organism. The number of gRNAs may comprise at least 2×, 3×, 5×, or 10× per a gene in an organism listed in Table 4. In some instances, the gRNA library targets at least one of a gene, a group of genes (e.g., 3-10 genes), a pathway (e.g., 10-100 genes), or a chassis (e.g., 100-1000 genes).


Highly Parallel De Novo Nucleic Acid Synthesis


Described herein is a platform approach utilizing miniaturization, parallelization, and vertical integration of the end-to-end process from oligonucleotide synthesis to gene assembly within nanowells on silicon to create a revolutionary synthesis platform. Devices described herein provide, with the same footprint as a 96-well plate, a silicon synthesis platform is capable of increasing throughput by a factor of 100 to 1,000 compared to traditional synthesis methods, with production of up to approximately 1,000,000 oligonucleotides in a single highly-parallelized run. In some instances, a single silicon plate described herein provides for synthesis of about 6100 non-identical oligonucleotides. In some instances, each of the non-identical oligonucleotides is located within a cluster. A cluster may comprise 50 to 500 non-identical oligonucleotides.


In some instances, DNA libraries encoding for gRNA libraries described herein have an error rate of less than 1:500 when compared to predetermined sequences for the DNAs. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have an aggregated error rate of less than 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500, 1:2000, 1:3000, 1:5000 or less when compared to predetermined sequences for the DNAs. In some instances, the aggregate error rate is less than 1:1000 when compared to predetermined sequences for the DNAs. The error rate may be an aggregate error rate or an average error rate.


In some instances, RNA libraries encoding for gRNA libraries described herein have an error rate of less than 1:500 when compared to predetermined sequences for the RNAs. In some instances, de novo oligonucleotide libraries disclosed herein have an aggregated error rate of less than 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500, 1:2000, 1:3000, 1:5000, 1:10,000 or less when compared to predetermined sequences for the RNAs. In some instances, the aggregate error rate is less than 1:1000 when compared to predetermined sequences for the RNAs.


Substrates


In some cases, described herein are substrates comprising a plurality of clusters, wherein each cluster comprises a plurality of loci that support the attachment and synthesis of oligonucleotides. The term “locus” as used herein refers to a discrete region on a structure which provides support for oligonucleotides encoding for a single predetermined sequence to extend from the surface. In some embodiments, a locus is on a two dimensional surface, e.g., a substantially planar surface. In some embodiments, a locus is on a three-dimensional surface, e.g., a well, microwell, channel, or post. In some embodiments, a surface of a locus comprises a material that is actively functionalized to attach to at least one nucleotide for oligonucleotide synthesis, or preferably, a population of identical nucleotides for synthesis of a population of oligonucleotides. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide refers to a population of oligonucleotides encoding for the same nucleic acid sequence. In some cases, a surface of a substrate is inclusive of one or a plurality of surfaces of a substrate. The average error rates for oligonucleotides synthesized within a library using the systems and methods provided are often less than 1 in 1000, less than about 1 in 2000, less than about 1 in 3000 or less often.


In some embodiments, a substrate comprises a surface that supports the synthesis of a plurality of oligonucleotides having different predetermined sequences at addressable locations on a common support. In some embodiments, a substrate provides support for the synthesis of more than 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2,000; 5,000; 10,000; 20,000; 50,000; 100,000; 200,000; 300,000; 400,000; 500,000; 600,000; 700,000; 800,000; 900,000; 1,000,000; 1,200,000; 1,400,000; 1,600,000; 1,800,000; 2,000,000; 2,500,000; 3,000,000; 3,500,000; 4,000,000; 4,500,000; 5,000,000; 10,000,000 or more non-identical oligonucleotides. In some cases, the substrate provides support for the synthesis of more than 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2,000; 5,000; 10,000; 20,000; 50,000; 100,000; 200,000; 300,000; 400,000; 500,000; 600,000; 700,000; 800,000; 900,000; 1,000,000; 1,200,000; 1,400,000; 1,600,000; 1,800,000; 2,000,000; 2,500,000; 3,000,000; 3,500,000; 4,000,000; 4,500,000; 5,000,000; 10,000,000 or more oligonucleotides encoding for distinct sequences. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the oligonucleotides have an identical sequence or are configured to be synthesized with an identical sequence. In some embodiments, the substrate provides a surface environment for the growth of oligonucleotides having at least 80, 90, 100, 120, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, 300, 325, 350, 375, 400, 425, 450, 475, 500 bases or more.


In some embodiments, oligonucleotides are synthesized on distinct loci of a substrate, wherein each locus supports the synthesis of a population of oligonucleotides. In some cases, each locus supports the synthesis of a population of oligonucleotides having a different sequence than a population of oligonucleotides grown on another locus. In some embodiments, the loci of a substrate are located within a plurality of clusters. In some instances, a substrate comprises at least 10, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 11000, 12000, 13000, 14000, 15000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000 or more clusters. In some embodiments, a substrate comprises more than 2,000; 5,000; 10,000; 100,000; 200,000; 300,000; 400,000; 500,000; 600,000; 700,000; 800,000; 900,000; 1,000,000; 1,100,000; 1,200,000; 1,300,000; 1,400,000; 1,500,000; 1,600,000; 1,700,000; 1,800,000; 1,900,000; 2,000,000; 300,000; 400,000; 500,000; 600,000; 700,000; 800,000; 900,000; 1,000,000; 1,200,000; 1,400,000; 1,600,000; 1,800,000; 2,000,000; 2,500,000; 3,000,000; 3,500,000; 4,000,000; 4,500,000; 5,000,000; or 10,000,000 or more distinct loci. In some embodiments, a substrate comprises about 10,000 distinct loci. The amount of loci within a single cluster is varied in different embodiments. In some cases, each cluster includes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, 130, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500 or more loci. In some embodiments, each cluster includes about 50-500 loci. In some embodiments, each cluster includes about 100-200 loci. In some embodiments, each cluster includes about 100-150 loci. In some embodiments, each cluster includes about 109, 121, 130 or 137 loci. In some embodiments, each cluster includes about 19, 20, 61, 64 or more loci.


Provided herein are methods for synthesizing non-identical oligonucleotides on a silicon plate. In some instances, the silicon plate includes about 1-10, 1-50, or 50-500 clusters. In some instances, the silicon plate includes more than about 50, 100, 250, 500, 2500, 5000, 6000, 6150, 10000 or more clusters. In some instances, each cluster includes 121 loci. In some instances, each cluster includes about 50-500, 50-200, 100-150 loci. In some instances, each cluster includes at least about 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 1000 or more loci. In some instances, a single plate includes 100, 500, 10000, 20000, 30000, 50000, 100000, 500000, 700000, 1000000 or more loci.


In some embodiments, the number of distinct oligonucleotides synthesized on a substrate is dependent on the number of distinct loci available in the substrate. In some embodiments, the density of loci within a cluster of a substrate is at least or about 1 locus per mm2, 10 loci per mm2, 25 loci per mm2, 50 loci per mm2, 65 loci per mm2, 75 loci per mm2, 100 loci per mm2, 130 loci per mm2, 150 loci per mm2, 175 loci per mm2, 200 loci per mm2, 300 loci per mm2, 400 loci per mm2, 500 loci per mm2, 1,000 loci per mm2 or more. In some cases, a substrate comprises from about 10 loci per mm2 to about 500 mm2, from about 25 loci per mm2 to about 400 mm2, from about 50 loci per mm2 to about 500 mm2, from about 100 loci per mm2 to about 500 mm2, from about 150 loci per mm2 to about 500 mm2, from about 10 loci per mm2 to about 250 mm2, from about 50 loci per mm2 to about 250 mm2, from about 10 loci per mm2 to about 200 mm2, or from about 50 loci per mm2 to about 200 mm2. In some embodiments, the distance between the centers of two adjacent loci within a cluster is from about 10 um to about 500 um, from about 10 um to about 200 um, or from about 10 um to about 100 um. In some cases, the distance between two centers of adjacent loci is greater than about 10 um, 20 um, 30 um, 40 um, 50 um, 60 um, 70 um, 80 um, 90 um or 100 um. In some cases, the distance between the centers of two adjacent loci is less than about 200 um, 150 um, 100 um, 80 um, 70 um, 60 um, 50 um, 40 um, 30 um, 20 um or 10 um. In some instances, each loci has a width of about 0.5 um, 1 um, 2 um, 3 um, 4 um, 5 um, 6 um, 7 um, 8 um, 9 um, 10 um, 20 um, 30 um, 40 um, 50 um, 60 um, 70 um, 80 um, 90 um or 100 um. In some cases, the each loci is has a width of about 0.5 um to 100 um, about 0.5 um to 50 um, about 10 um to 75 um, or about 0.5 um to 50 um.


In some embodiments, the density of clusters within a substrate is at least or about 1 cluster per 100 mm2, 1 cluster per 10 mm2, 1 cluster per 5 m2, 1 cluster per 4 mm2, 1 cluster per 3 cluster per 100 mm2, 1 cluster per 10 mm, 1 cluster per 5 mm, 1 cluster per 4 mm2, 1 cluster per 3 mm2, 1 cluster per 2 mm2, 1 cluster per 1 mm2, 2 clusters per 1 mm2, 3 clusters per 1 mm2, 4 clusters per 1 mm2, 5 clusters per 1 mm2, 10 clusters per 1 mm2, 50 clusters per 1 mm2 or more. In some embodiments, a substrate comprises from about 1 cluster per 10 mm2 to about 10 clusters per 1 mm2. In some embodiments, the distance between the centers of two adjacent clusters is less than about 50 um, 100 um, 200 um, 500 um, 1000 um, or 2000 um or 5000 um. In some cases, the distance between the centers of two adjacent clusters is between about 50 um and about 100 um, between about 50 um and about 200 um, between about 50 um and about 300 um, between about 50 um and about 500 um, and between about 100 um to about 2000 um. In some cases, the distance between the centers of two adjacent clusters is between about 0.05 mm to about 50 mm, between about 0.05 mm to about 10 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 5 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 4 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 3 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 2 mm, between about 0.1 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.2 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.3 mm and about 10 mm, between about 0.4 mm and about 10 mm, between about 0.5 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 5 mm, or between about 0.5 mm and about 2 mm. In some cases, each cluster has a cross section of about 0.5 to 2 mm, about 0.5 to 1 mm, or about 1 to 2 mm. In some cases, each cluster has a cross section of about 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 or 2 mm. In some cases, each cluster has an interior cross section of about 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.15, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 or 2 mm.


In some embodiments, a substrate is about the size of a standard 96 well plate, for example between about 100 and 200 mm by between about 50 and 150 mm. In some embodiments, a substrate has a diameter less than or equal to about 1000 mm, 500 mm, 450 mm, 400 mm, 300 mm, 250 nm, 200 mm, 150 mm, 100 mm or 50 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a substrate is between about 25 mm and 1000 mm, between about 25 mm and about 800 mm, between about 25 mm and about 600 mm, between about 25 mm and about 500 mm, between about 25 mm and about 400 mm, between about 25 mm and about 300 mm, or between about 25 mm and about 200. Non-limiting examples of substrate size include about 300 mm, 200 mm, 150 mm, 130 mm, 100 mm, 76 mm, 51 mm and 25 mm. In some embodiments, a substrate has a planar surface area of at least about 100 mm2; 200 mm2; 500 mm2; 1,000 mm2; 2,000 mm2; 5,000 mm2; 10,000 mm2; 12,000 mm2; 15,000 mm2; 20,000 mm2; 30,000 mm2; 40,000 mm2; 50,000 mm2 or more. In some embodiments, the thickness of a substrate is between about 50 mm and about 2000 mm, between about 50 mm and about 1000 mm, between about 100 mm and about 1000 mm, between about 200 mm and about 1000 mm, or between about 250 mm and about 1000 mm. Non-limiting examples of substrate thickness include 275 mm, 375 mm, 525 mm, 625 mm, 675 mm, 725 mm, 775 mm and 925 mm. In some cases, the thickness of a substrate varies with diameter and depends on the composition of the substrate. For example, a substrate comprising materials other than silicon has a different thickness than a silicon substrate of the same diameter. Substrate thickness may be determined by the mechanical strength of the material used and the substrate must be thick enough to support its own weight without cracking during handling.


Surface Materials


Substrates, devices and reactors provided herein are fabricated from any variety of materials suitable for the methods and compositions described herein. In certain embodiments, substrate materials are fabricated to exhibit a low level of nucleotide binding. In some cases, substrate materials are modified to generate distinct surfaces that exhibit a high level of nucleotide binding. In some embodiments, substrate materials are transparent to visible and/or UV light. In some embodiments, substrate materials are sufficiently conductive, e.g., are able to form uniform electric fields across all or a portion of a substrate. In some embodiments, conductive materials are connected to an electric ground. In some cases, the substrate is heat conductive or insulated. In some cases, the materials are chemical resistant and heat resistant to support chemical or biochemical reactions, for example oligonucleotide synthesis reaction processes. In some embodiments, a substrate comprises flexible materials. Flexible materials include, without limitation, modified nylon, unmodified nylon, nitrocellulose, polypropylene, and the like. In some embodiments, a substrate comprises rigid materials. Rigid materials include, without limitation, glass, fuse silica, silicon, silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, plastics (for example, polytetraflouroethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polycarbonate, and blends thereof, and the like), and metals (for example, gold, platinum, and the like). In some embodiments, a substrate is fabricated from a material comprising silicon, polystyrene, agarose, dextran, cellulosic polymers, polyacrylamides, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), glass, or any combination thereof. In some cases, a substrate is manufactured with a combination of materials listed herein or any other suitable material known in the art.


Surface Architecture


In various embodiments, a substrate comprises raised and/or lowered features. One benefit of having such features is an increase in surface area to support oligonucleotide synthesis. In some embodiments, a substrate having raised and/or lowered features is referred to as a three-dimensional substrate. In some cases, a three-dimensional substrate comprises one or more channels. In some cases, one or more loci comprise a channel. In some cases, the channels are accessible to reagent deposition via a deposition device such as an oligonucleotide synthesizer. In some cases, reagents and/or fluids collect in a larger well in fluid communication one or more channels. For example, a substrate comprises a plurality of channels corresponding to a plurality of loci with a cluster, and the plurality of channels are in fluid communication with one well of the cluster. In some methods, a library of oligonucleotides is synthesized in a plurality of loci of a cluster.


In some embodiments, the structure is configured to allow for controlled flow and mass transfer paths for oligonucleotide synthesis on a surface. In some embodiments, the configuration of a substrate allows for the controlled and even distribution of mass transfer paths, chemical exposure times, and/or wash efficacy during oligonucleotide synthesis. In some embodiments, the configuration of a substrate allows for increased sweep efficiency, for example by providing sufficient volume for a growing an oligonucleotide such that the excluded volume by the growing oligonucleotide does not take up more than 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1%, or less of the initially available volume that is available or suitable for growing the oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, a three-dimensional structure allows for managed flow of fluid to allow for the rapid exchange of chemical exposure.


In some embodiments, segregation is achieved by physical structure. In some embodiments, segregation is achieved by differential functionalization of the surface generating active and passive regions for oligonucleotide synthesis. Differential functionalization is also be achieved by alternating the hydrophobicity across the substrate surface, thereby creating water contact angle effects that cause beading or wetting of the deposited reagents. Employing larger structures can decrease splashing and cross-contamination of distinct oligonucleotide synthesis locations with reagents of the neighboring spots. In some cases, a device, such as an oligonucleotide synthesizer, is used to deposit reagents to distinct oligonucleotide synthesis locations. Substrates having three-dimensional features are configured in a manner that allows for the synthesis of a large number of oligonucleotides (e.g., more than about 10,000) with a low error rate (e.g., less than about 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500, 1:2,000; 1:3,000; 1:5,000; or 1:10,000). In some cases, a substrate comprises features with a density of about or greater than about 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 300, 400 or 500 features per mm2.


A well of a substrate may have the same or different width, height, and/or volume as another well of the substrate. A channel of a substrate may have the same or different width, height, and/or volume as another channel of the substrate. In some embodiments, the diameter of a cluster or the diameter of a well comprising a cluster, or both, is between about 0.05 mm to about 50 mm, between about 0.05 mm to about 10 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 5 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 4 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 3 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 2 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 0.5 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 0.1 mm, between about 0.1 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.2 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.3 mm and about 10 mm, between about 0.4 mm and about 10 mm, between about 0.5 mm and 10 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 5 mm, or between about 0.5 mm and about 2 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a cluster or well or both is less than or about 5 mm, 4 mm, 3 mm, 2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.1 mm, 0.09 mm, 0.08 mm, 0.07 mm, 0.06 mm or 0.05 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a cluster or well or both is between about 1.0 and 1.3 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a cluster or well, or both is about 1.150 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a cluster or well, or both is about 0.08 mm. The diameter of a cluster refers to clusters within a two-dimensional or three-dimensional substrate.


In some embodiments, the height of a well is from about 20 um to about 1000 um, from about 50 um to about 1000 um, from about 100 um to about 1000 um, from about 200 um to about 1000 um, from about 300 um to about 1000 um, from about 400 um to about 1000 um, or from about 500 um to about 1000 um. In some cases, the height of a well is less than about 1000 um, less than about 900 um, less than about 800 um, less than about 700 um, or less than about 600 um.


In some embodiments, a substrate comprises a plurality of channels corresponding to a plurality of loci within a cluster, wherein the height or depth of a channel is from about 5 um to about 500 um, from about 5 um to about 400 um, from about 5 um to about 300 um, from about 5 um to about 200 um, from about 5 um to about 100 um, from about 5 um to about 50 um, or from about 10 um to about 50 um. In some cases, the height of a channel is less than 100 um, less than 80 um, less than 60 um, less than 40 um or less than 20 um.


In some embodiments, the diameter of a channel, locus (e.g., in a substantially planar substrate) or both channel and locus (e.g., in a three-dimensional substrate wherein a locus corresponds to a channel) is from about 1 um to about 1000 um, from about 1 um to about 500 um, from about 1 um to about 200 um, from about 1 um to about 100 um, from about 5 um to about 100 urn, or from about 10 um to about 100 um, for example, about 90 um, 80 um, 70 um, 60 um, 50 um, 40 um, 30 um, 20 um or 10 um. In some embodiments, the diameter of a channel, locus, or both channel and locus is less than about 100 um, 90 um, 80 um, 70 um, 60 um, 50 um, 40 um, 30 um, 20 um or 10 um. In some embodiments, the distance between the center of two adjacent channels, loci, or channels and loci is from about 1 um to about 500 um, from about 1 um to about 200 um, from about 1 um to about 100 um, from about 5 um to about 200 um, from about 5 um to about 100 urn, from about 5 um to about 50 um, or from about 5 um to about 30 um, for example, about 20 um.


Surface Modifications


In various embodiments, surface modifications are employed for the chemical and/or physical alteration of a surface by an additive or subtractive process to change one or more chemical and/or physical properties of a substrate surface or a selected site or region of a substrate surface. For example, surface modifications include, without limitation, (1) changing the wetting properties of a surface, (2) functionalizing a surface, i.e., providing, modifying or substituting surface functional groups, (3) defunctionalizing a surface, i.e., removing surface functional groups, (4) otherwise altering the chemical composition of a surface, e.g., through etching, (5) increasing or decreasing surface roughness, (6) providing a coating on a surface, e.g., a coating that exhibits wetting properties that are different from the wetting properties of the surface, and/or (7) depositing particulates on a surface.


In some cases, the addition of a chemical layer on top of a surface (referred to as adhesion promoter) facilitates structured patterning of loci on a surface of a substrate. Exemplary surfaces for application of adhesion promotion include, without limitation, glass, silicon, silicon dioxide and silicon nitride. In some cases, the adhesion promoter is a chemical with a high surface energy. In some embodiments, a second chemical layer is deposited on a surface of a substrate. In some cases, the second chemical layer has a low surface energy. In some cases, surface energy of a chemical layer coated on a surface supports localization of droplets on the surface. Depending on the patterning arrangement selected, the proximity of loci and/or area of fluid contact at the loci are alterable.


In some embodiments, a substrate surface, or resolved loci, onto which nucleic acids or other moieties are deposited, e.g., for oligonucleotide synthesis, are smooth or substantially planar (e.g., two-dimensional) or have irregularities, such as raised or lowered features (e.g., three-dimensional features). In some embodiments, a substrate surface is modified with one or more different layers of compounds. Such modification layers of interest include, without limitation, inorganic and organic layers such as metals, metal oxides, polymers, small organic molecules and the like. Non-limiting polymeric layers include peptides, proteins, nucleic acids or mimetics thereof (e.g., peptide nucleic acids and the like), polysaccharides, phospholipids, polyurethanes, polyesters, polycarbonates, polyureas, polyamides, polyetheyleneamines, polyarylene sulfides, polysiloxanes, polyimides, polyacetates, and any other suitable compounds described herein or otherwise known in the art. In some cases, polymers are heteropolymeric. In some cases, polymers are homopolymeric. In some cases, polymers comprise functional moieties or are conjugated.


In some embodiments, resolved loci of a substrate are functionalized with one or more moieties that increase and/or decrease surface energy. In some cases, a moiety is chemically inert. In some cases, a moiety is configured to support a desired chemical reaction, for example, one or more processes in an oligonucleotide synthesis reaction. The surface energy, or hydrophobicity, of a surface is a factor for determining the affinity of a nucleotide to attach onto the surface. In some embodiments, a method for substrate functionalization comprises: (a) providing a substrate having a surface that comprises silicon dioxide; and (b) silanizing the surface using, a suitable silanizing agent described herein or otherwise known in the art, for example, an organofunctional alkoxysilane molecule. In some cases, the organofunctional alkoxysilane molecule comprises dimethylchloro-octodecyl-silane, methyldichloro-octodecyl-silane, trichloro-octodecyl-silane, trimethyl-octodecyl-silane, triethyl-octodecyl-silane, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a substrate surface comprises functionalized with polyethylene/polypropylene (functionalized by gamma irradiation or chromic acid oxidation, and reduction to hydroxyalkyl surface), highly crosslinked polystyrene-divinylbenzene (derivatized by chloromethylation, and aminated to benzylamine functional surface), nylon (the terminal aminohexyl groups are directly reactive), or etched with reduced polytetrafluoroethylene. Other methods and functionalizing agents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,796, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In some embodiments, a substrate surface is functionalized by contact with a derivatizing composition that contains a mixture of silanes, under reaction conditions effective to couple the silanes to the substrate surface, typically via reactive hydrophilic moieties present on the substrate surface. Silanization generally covers a surface through self-assembly with organofunctional alkoxysilane molecules. A variety of siloxane functionalizing reagents can further be used as currently known in the art, e.g., for lowering or increasing surface energy. The organofunctional alkoxysilanes are classified according to their organic functions. Non-limiting examples of siloxane functionalizing reagents include hydroxyalkyl siloxanes (silylate surface, functionalizing with diborane and oxidizing the alcohol by hydrogen peroxide), diol (dihydroxyalkyl) siloxanes (silylate surface, and hydrolyzing to diol), aminoalkyl siloxanes (amines require no intermediate functionalizing step), glycidoxysilanes (3-glycidoxypropyl-dimethyl-ethoxysilane, glycidoxy-trimethoxysilane), mercaptosilanes (3-mercaptopropyl-trimethoxysilane, 3-4 epoxycyclohexyl-ethyltrimethoxysilane or 3-mercaptopropyl-methyl-dimethoxysilane), bicyclohepthenyl-trichlorosilane, butyl-aldehydr-trimethoxysilane, or dimeric secondary aminoalkyl siloxanes. Exemplary hydroxyalkyl siloxanes include allyl trichlorochlorosilane turning into 3-hydroxypropyl, or 7-oct-1-enyl trichlorochlorosilane turning into 8-hydroxyoctyl. The diol (dihydroxyalkyl) siloxanes include glycidyl trimethoxysilane-derived (2,3-dihydroxypropyloxy)propyl (GOPS). The aminoalkyl siloxanes include 3-aminopropyl trimethoxysilane turning into 3-aminopropyl (3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyl-diethoxy-methylsilane, 3-aminopropyl-dimethyl-ethoxysilane, or 3-aminopropyl-trimethoxysilane). Exemplary dimeric secondary aminoalkyl siloxanes include bis (3-trimethoxysilylpropyl) amine turning into bis(silyloxylpropyl)amine. In some embodiments, the functionalizing agent comprises 11-acetoxyundecyltriethoxysilane, n-decyltriethoxysilane, (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane, (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, glycidyloxypropyl/trimethoxysilane and N-(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)-4-hydroxybutyramide.


Oligonucleotide Synthesis


Methods for oligonucleotide synthesis, in various embodiments, include processes involving phosphoramidite chemistry. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises coupling a base with phosphoramidite. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises coupling a base by deposition of phosphoramidite under coupling conditions, wherein the same base is optionally deposited with phosphoramidite more than once, i.e., double coupling. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises capping of unreacted sites. In some cases, capping is optional. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises oxidation. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises deblocking or detritylation. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises sulfurization. In some cases, oligonucleotide synthesis comprises either oxidation or sulfurization. In some embodiments, between one or each step during an oligonucleotide synthesis reaction, the substrate is washed, for example, using tetrazole or acetonitrile. Time frames for any one step in a phosphoramidite synthesis method include less than about 2 min, 1 min, 50 sec, 40 sec, 30 sec, 20 sec and 10 sec.


Oligonucleotide synthesis using a phosphoramidite method comprises the subsequent addition of a phosphoramidite building block (e.g., nucleoside phosphoramidite) to a growing oligonucleotide chain for the formation of a phosphite triester linkage. Phosphoramidite oligonucleotide synthesis proceeds in the 3′ to 5′ direction. Phosphoramidite oligonucleotide synthesis allows for the controlled addition of one nucleotide to a growing nucleic acid chain per synthesis cycle. In some embodiments, each synthesis cycle comprises a coupling step. Phosphoramidite coupling involves the formation of a phosphite triester linkage between an activated nucleoside phosphoramidite and a nucleoside bound to the substrate, for example, via a linker. In some embodiments, the nucleoside phosphoramidite is provided to the substrate activated. In some embodiments, the nucleoside phosphoramidite is provided to the substrate with an activator. In some embodiments, nucleoside phosphoramidites are provided to the substrate in a 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100-fold excess or more over the substrate-bound nucleosides. In some embodiments, the addition of nucleoside phosphoramidite is performed in an anhydrous environment, for example, in anhydrous acetonitrile. Following addition of a nucleoside phosphoramidite, the substrate is optionally washed. In some embodiments, the coupling step is repeated one or more additional times, optionally with a wash step between nucleoside phosphoramidite additions to the substrate. In some embodiments, an oligonucleotide synthesis method used herein comprises 1, 2, 3 or more sequential coupling steps. Prior to coupling, in many cases, the nucleoside bound to the substrate is de-protected by removal of a protecting group, where the protecting group functions to prevent polymerization. A common protecting group is 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl (DMT).


Following coupling, phosphoramidite oligonucleotide synthesis methods optionally comprise a capping step. In a capping step, the growing oligonucleotide is treated with a capping agent. A capping step is useful to block unreacted substrate-bound 5′-OH groups after coupling from further chain elongation, preventing the formation of oligonucleotides with internal base deletions. Further, phosphoramidites activated with 1H-tetrazole may react, to a small extent, with the O6 position of guanosine. Without being bound by theory, upon oxidation with I2/water, this side product, possibly via O6-N7 migration, may undergo depurination. The apurinic sites may end up being cleaved in the course of the final deprotection of the oligonucleotide thus reducing the yield of the full-length product. The O6 modifications may be removed by treatment with the capping reagent prior to oxidation with I2/water. In some embodiments, inclusion of a capping step during oligonucleotide synthesis decreases the error rate as compared to synthesis without capping. As an example, the capping step comprises treating the substrate-bound oligonucleotide with a mixture of acetic anhydride and 1-methylimidazole. Following a capping step, the substrate is optionally washed.


In some embodiments, following addition of a nucleoside phosphoramidite, and optionally after capping and one or more wash steps, the substrate bound growing nucleic acid is oxidized. The oxidation step comprises the phosphite triester is oxidized into a tetracoordinated phosphate triester, a protected precursor of the naturally occurring phosphate diester internucleoside linkage. In some cases, oxidation of the growing oligonucleotide is achieved by treatment with iodine and water, optionally in the presence of a weak base (e.g., pyridine, lutidine, collidine). Oxidation may be carried out under anhydrous conditions using, e.g. tert-Butyl hydroperoxide or (1S)-(+)-(10-camphorsulfonyl)-oxaziridine (CSO). In some methods, a capping step is performed following oxidation. A second capping step allows for substrate drying, as residual water from oxidation that may persist can inhibit subsequent coupling. Following oxidation, the substrate and growing oligonucleotide is optionally washed. In some embodiments, the step of oxidation is substituted with a sulfurization step to obtain oligonucleotide phosphorothioates, wherein any capping steps can be performed after the sulfurization. Many reagents are capable of the efficient sulfur transfer, including but not limited to 3-(Dimethylaminomethylidene)amino)-3H-1,2,4-dithiazole-3-thione, DDTT, 3H-1,2-benzodithiol-3-one 1,1-dioxide, also known as Beaucage reagent, and N,N,N′N′-Tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TETD).


In order for a subsequent cycle of nucleoside incorporation to occur through coupling, the protected 5′ end of the substrate bound growing oligonucleotide is removed so that the primary hydroxyl group is reactive with a next nucleoside phosphoramidite. In some embodiments, the protecting group is DMT and deblocking occurs with trichloroacetic acid in dichloromethane. Conducting detritylation for an extended time or with stronger than recommended solutions of acids may lead to increased depurination of solid support-bound oligonucleotide and thus reduces the yield of the desired full-length product. Methods and compositions of the invention described herein provide for controlled deblocking conditions limiting undesired depurination reactions. In some cases, the substrate bound oligonucleotide is washed after deblocking. In some cases, efficient washing after deblocking contributes to synthesized oligonucleotides having a low error rate.


Methods for the synthesis of oligonucleotides typically involve an iterating sequence of the following steps: application of a protected monomer to an actively functionalized surface (e.g., locus) to link with either the activated surface, a linker or with a previously deprotected monomer; deprotection of the applied monomer so that it is reactive with a subsequently applied protected monomer; and application of another protected monomer for linking. One or more intermediate steps include oxidation or sulfurization. In some cases, one or more wash steps precede or follow one or all of the steps.


Methods for phosphoramidite based oligonucleotide synthesis comprise a series of chemical steps. In some embodiments, one or more steps of a synthesis method involve reagent cycling, where one or more steps of the method comprise application to the substrate of a reagent useful for the step. For example, reagents are cycled by a series of liquid deposition and vacuum drying steps. For substrates comprising three-dimensional features such as wells, microwells, channels and the like, reagents are optionally passed through one or more regions of the substrate via the wells and/or channels.


Oligonucleotides synthesized using the methods and/or substrates described herein comprise, in various embodiments, at least about 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 90, 100, 120, 150 or more bases. In some embodiments, at least about 1 pmol, 10 pmol, 20 pmol, 30 pmol, 40 pmol, 50 pmol, 60 pmol, 70 pmol, 80 pmol, 90 pmol, 100 pmol, 150 pmol, 200 pmol, 300 pmol, 400 pmol, 500 pmol, 600 pmol, 700 pmol, 800 pmol, 900 pmol, 1 nmol, 5 nmol, 10 nmol, 100 nmol or more of an oligonucleotide is synthesized within a locus. Methods for oligonucleotide synthesis on a surface provided herein allow for synthesis at a fast rate. As an example, at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 nucleotides per hour, or more are synthesized. Nucleotides include adenine, guanine, thymine, cytosine, uridine building blocks, or analogs/modified versions thereof. In some embodiments, libraries of oligonucleotides are synthesized in parallel on substrate. For example, a substrate comprising about or at least about 100; 1,000; 10,000; 100,000; 1,000,000; 2,000,000; 3,000,000; 4,000,000; or 5,000,000 resolved loci is able to support the synthesis of at least the same number of distinct oligonucleotides, wherein oligonucleotide encoding a distinct sequence is synthesized on a resolved locus. In some embodiments, a library of oligonucleotides are synthesized on a substrate with low error rates described herein in less than about three months, two months, one month, three weeks, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 days, 24 hours or less. In some embodiments, larger nucleic acids assembled from an oligonucleotide library synthesized with low error rate using the substrates and methods described herein are prepared in less than about three months, two months, one month, three weeks, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 days, 24 hours or less.


Once large oligonucleotides for generation are selected, a predetermined library of oligonucleotides is designed for de novo synthesis. Various suitable methods are known for generating high density oligonucleotide arrays. In the workflow example, a substrate surface layer is provided. In the example, chemistry of the surface is altered in order to improve the oligonucleotide synthesis process. Areas of low surface energy are generated to repel liquid while areas of high surface energy are generated to attract liquids. The surface itself may be in the form of a planar surface or contain variations in shape, such as protrusions or microwells which increase surface area. In the workflow example, high surface energy molecules selected serve a dual function of supporting DNA chemistry, as disclosed in International Patent Application Publication WO/2015/021080, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In situ preparation of oligonucleotide arrays is generated on a solid support and utilizes single nucleotide extension process to extend multiple oligomers in parallel. A deposition device, such as an oligonucleotide synthesizer, is designed to release reagents in a step wise fashion such that multiple oligonucleotides extend, in parallel, one residue at a time to generate oligomers with a predetermined nucleic acid sequence. In some cases, oligonucleotides are cleaved from the surface at this stage. Cleavage includes gas cleavage, e.g., with ammonia or methylamine.


Computer Systems


Any of the systems described herein, may be operably linked to a computer and may be automated through a computer either locally or remotely. In various embodiments, the methods and systems of the invention may further comprise software programs on computer systems and use thereof. Accordingly, computerized control for the synchronization of the dispense/vacuum/refill functions such as orchestrating and synchronizing the material deposition device movement, dispense action and vacuum actuation are within the bounds of the invention. The computer systems may be programmed to interface between the user specified base sequence and the position of a material deposition device to deliver the correct reagents to specified regions of the substrate.


The computer system 800 illustrated in FIG. 8 may be understood as a logical apparatus that can read instructions from media 811 and/or a network port 805, which can optionally be connected to server 809 having fixed media 812. The system, such as shown in FIG. 8 can include a CPU 801, disk drives 803, optional input devices such as keyboard 815 and/or mouse 816 and optional monitor 807. Data communication can be achieved through the indicated communication medium to a server at a local or a remote location. The communication medium can include any means of transmitting and/or receiving data. For example, the communication medium can be a network connection, a wireless connection or an internet connection. Such a connection can provide for communication over the World Wide Web. It is envisioned that data relating to the present disclosure can be transmitted over such networks or connections for reception and/or review by a party 822 as illustrated in FIG. 8.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a first example architecture of a computer system 900 that can be used in connection with example embodiments of the present invention. As depicted in FIG. 9, the example computer system can include a processor 902 for processing instructions. Non-limiting examples of processors include: Intel Xeon™ processor, AMD Opteron™ processor, Samsung 32-bit RISC ARM 1176JZ(F)-S v1.0™ processor, ARM Cortex-A8 Samsung S5PC100™ processor, ARM Cortex-A8 Apple A4™ processor, Marvell PXA 930™ processor, or a functionally-equivalent processor. Multiple threads of execution can be used for parallel processing. In some embodiments, multiple processors or processors with multiple cores can also be used, whether in a single computer system, in a cluster, or distributed across systems over a network comprising a plurality of computers, cell phones, and/or personal data assistant devices.


As illustrated in FIG. 9, a high speed cache 904 can be connected to, or incorporated in, the processor 902 to provide a high speed memory for instructions or data that have been recently, or are frequently, used by processor 902. The processor 902 is connected to a north bridge 906 by a processor bus 908. The north bridge 906 is connected to random access memory (RAM) 910 by a memory bus 912 and manages access to the RAM 910 by the processor 902. The north bridge 906 is also connected to a south bridge 914 by a chipset bus 916. The south bridge 914 is, in turn, connected to a peripheral bus 918. The peripheral bus can be, for example, PCI, PCI-X, PCI Express, or other peripheral bus. The north bridge and south bridge are often referred to as a processor chipset and manage data transfer between the processor, RAM, and peripheral components on the peripheral bus 918. In some alternative architectures, the functionality of the north bridge can be incorporated into the processor instead of using a separate north bridge chip. In some embodiments, system 900 can include an accelerator card 922 attached to the peripheral bus 918. The accelerator can include field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or other hardware for accelerating certain processing. For example, an accelerator can be used for adaptive data restructuring or to evaluate algebraic expressions used in extended set processing.


Software and data are stored in external storage 924 and can be loaded into RAM 910 and/or cache 904 for use by the processor. The system 900 includes an operating system for managing system resources; non-limiting examples of operating systems include: Linux, Windows™, MACOS™, BlackBerry OS™, iOS™, and other functionally-equivalent operating systems, as well as application software running on top of the operating system for managing data storage and optimization in accordance with example embodiments of the present invention. In this example, system 900 also includes network interface cards (NICs) 920 and 921 connected to the peripheral bus for providing network interfaces to external storage, such as Network Attached Storage (NAS) and other computer systems that can be used for distributed parallel processing.



FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a network 1000 with a plurality of computer systems 1002a, and 1002b, a plurality of cell phones and personal data assistants 1002c, and Network Attached Storage (NAS) 1004a, and 1004b. In example embodiments, systems 1002a, 1002b, and 1002c can manage data storage and optimize data access for data stored in Network Attached Storage (NAS) 1004a and 1004b. A mathematical model can be used for the data and be evaluated using distributed parallel processing across computer systems 1002a, and 1002b, and cell phone and personal data assistant systems 1002c. Computer systems 1002a, and 1002b, and cell phone and personal data assistant systems 1002c can also provide parallel processing for adaptive data restructuring of the data stored in Network Attached Storage (NAS) 1004a and 1004b. FIG. 10 illustrates an example only, and a wide variety of other computer architectures and systems can be used in conjunction with the various embodiments of the present invention. For example, a blade server can be used to provide parallel processing. Processor blades can be connected through a back plane to provide parallel processing. Storage can also be connected to the back plane or as Network Attached Storage (NAS) through a separate network interface. In some example embodiments, processors can maintain separate memory spaces and transmit data through network interfaces, back plane or other connectors for parallel processing by other processors. In other embodiments, some or all of the processors can use a shared virtual address memory space.



FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a multiprocessor computer system using a shared virtual address memory space in accordance with an example embodiment. The system includes a plurality of processors 1102a-f that can access a shared memory subsystem 1104. The system incorporates a plurality of programmable hardware memory algorithm processors (MAPs) 1106a-f in the memory subsystem 1104. Each MAP 1106a-f can comprise a memory 1108a-f and one or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) 1110a-f. The MAP provides a configurable functional unit and particular algorithms or portions of algorithms can be provided to the FPGAs 1110a-f for processing in close coordination with a respective processor. For example, the MAPs can be used to evaluate algebraic expressions regarding the data model and to perform adaptive data restructuring in example embodiments. In this example, each MAP is globally accessible by all of the processors for these purposes. In one configuration, each MAP can use Direct Memory Access (DMA) to access an associated memory 1108a-f, allowing it to execute tasks independently of, and asynchronously from, the respective microprocessor 1102a-f. In this configuration, a MAP can feed results directly to another MAP for pipelining and parallel execution of algorithms.


The above computer architectures and systems are examples only, and a wide variety of other computer, cell phone, and personal data assistant architectures and systems can be used in connection with example embodiments, including systems using any combination of general processors, co-processors, FPGAs and other programmable logic devices, system on chips (SOCs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and other processing and logic elements. In some embodiments, all or part of the computer system can be implemented in software or hardware. Any variety of data storage media can be used in connection with example embodiments, including random access memory, hard drives, flash memory, tape drives, disk arrays, Network Attached Storage (NAS) and other local or distributed data storage devices and systems.


In example embodiments, the computer system can be implemented using software modules executing on any of the above or other computer architectures and systems. In other embodiments, the functions of the system can be implemented partially or completely in firmware, programmable logic devices such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) as referenced in FIG. 11, system on chips (SOCs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or other processing and logic elements. For example, the Set Processor and Optimizer can be implemented with hardware acceleration through the use of a hardware accelerator card, such as accelerator card 922 illustrated in FIG. 9.


The following examples are set forth to illustrate more clearly the principle and practice of embodiments disclosed herein to those skilled in the art and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of any claimed embodiments. Unless otherwise stated, all parts and percentages are on a weight basis.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are given for the purpose of illustrating various embodiments of the invention and are not meant to limit the present invention in any fashion. The present examples, along with the methods described herein are presently representative of preferred embodiments, are exemplary, and are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Changes therein and other uses which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the claims will occur to those skilled in the art.


Example 1: Functionalization of a Substrate Surface

A substrate was functionalized to support the attachment and synthesis of a library of oligonucleotides. The substrate surface was first wet cleaned using a piranha solution comprising 90% H2SO4 and 10% H2O2 for 20 minutes. The substrate was rinsed in several beakers with DI water, held under a DI water gooseneck faucet for 5 min, and dried with N2. The substrate was subsequently soaked in NH4OH (1:100; 3 mL:300 mL) for 5 min, rinsed with DI water using a handgun, soaked in three successive beakers with DI water for 1 min each, and then rinsed again with DI water using the handgun. The substrate was then plasma cleaned by exposing the substrate surface to O2. A SAMCO PC-300 instrument was used to plasma etch O2 at 250 watts for 1 min in downstream mode.


The cleaned substrate surface was actively functionalized with a solution comprising N-(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)-4-hydroxybutyramide using a YES-1224P vapor deposition oven system with the following parameters: 0.5 to 1 torr, 60 min, 70° C., 135° C. vaporizer. The substrate surface was resist coated using a Brewer Science 200× spin coater. SPR™ 3612 photoresist was spin coated on the substrate at 2500 rpm for 40 sec. The substrate was pre-baked for 30 min at 90° C. on a Brewer hot plate. The substrate was subjected to photolithography using a Karl Suss MA6 mask aligner instrument. The substrate was exposed for 2.2 sec and developed for 1 min in MSF 26A. Remaining developer was rinsed with the handgun and the substrate soaked in water for 5 min. The substrate was baked for 30 min at 100° C. in the oven, followed by visual inspection for lithography defects using a Nikon L200. A cleaning process was used to remove residual resist using the SAMCO PC-300 instrument to O2 plasma etch at 250 watts for 1 min.


The substrate surface was passively functionalized with a 100 μL solution of perfluorooctyltrichlorosilane mixed with 10 μL light mineral oil. The substrate was placed in a chamber, pumped for 10 min, and then the valve was closed to the pump and left to stand for 10 min. The chamber was vented to air. The substrate was resist stripped by performing two soaks for 5 min in 500 mL NMP at 70° C. with ultrasonication at maximum power (9 on Crest system). The substrate was then soaked for 5 min in 500 mL isopropanol at room temperature with ultrasonication at maximum power. The substrate was dipped in 300 mL of 200 proof ethanol and blown dry with N2. The functionalized surface was activated to serve as a support for oligonucleotide synthesis.


Example 2: Synthesis of a 50-Mer Sequence on an Oligonucleotide Synthesis Device

A two dimensional oligonucleotide synthesis device was assembled into a flowcell, which was connected to a flowcell (Applied Biosystems “ABI394 DNA Synthesizer”). The two-dimensional oligonucleotide synthesis device was uniformly functionalized with N-(3-TRIETHOXYSILYLPROPYL)-4-HYDROXYBUTYRAMIDE (Gelest) was used to synthesize an exemplary oligonucleotide of 50 bp (“50-mer oligonucleotide”) using oligonucleotide synthesis methods described herein.


The sequence of the 50-mer was as described in SEQ ID NO.: 1. 5′AGACAATCAACCATTTGGGGTGGACAGCCTTGACCTCTAGACTTCGGCAT##TTTTTTT TTT3′ (SEQ ID NO.: 1), where # denotes Thymidine-succinyl hexamide CED phosphoramidite (CLP-2244 from ChemGenes), which is a cleavable linker enabling the release of oligonucleotides from the surface during deprotection.


The synthesis was done using standard DNA synthesis chemistry (coupling, capping, oxidation, and deblocking) according to the protocol in Table 5 and an ABI synthesizer.










TABLE 5







General DNA Synthesis
Table 5









Process Name
Process Step
Time (sec)












WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
Acetonitrile to Flowcell
23



N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4


DNA BASE ADDITION
Activator Manifold Flush
2


(Phosphoramidite +
Activator to Flowcell
6


Activator Flow)
Activator +
6



Phosphoramidite to




Flowcell




Activator to Flowcell
0.5



Activator +
5



Phosphoramidite to




Flowcell




Activator to Flowcell
0.5



Activator +
5



Phosphoramidite to




Flowcell




Activator to Flowcell
0.5



Activator +
5



Phosphoramidite to




Flowcell




Incubate for 25 sec
25


WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15



N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4


DNA BASE ADDITION
Activator Manifold Flush
2


(Phosphoramidite +
Activator to Flowcell
5


Activator Flow)
Activator +
18



Phosphoramidite to




Flowcell




Incubate for 25 sec
25


WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15



N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4


CAPPING (CapA + B, 1:1,
CapA + B to Flowcell
15


Flow)




WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15



Acetonitrile System Flush
4


OXIDATION (Oxidizer
Oxidizer to Flowcell
18


Flow)




WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4



Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15



Acetonitrile System Flush
4



Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15



N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4



Acetonitrile to Flowcell
23



N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4


DEBLOCKING (Deblock
Deblock to Flowcell
36


Flow)




WASH (Acetonitrile Wash
Acetonitrile System Flush
4


Flow)
N2 System Flush
4



Acetonitrile System Flush
4



Acetonitrile to Flowcell
18



N2 System Flush
4.13



Acetonitrile System Flush
4.13



Acetonitrile to Flowcell
15









The phosphoramidite/activator combination was delivered similar to the delivery of bulk reagents through the flowcell. No drying steps were performed as the environment stays “wet” with reagent the entire time.


The flow restrictor was removed from the ABI 394 synthesizer to enable faster flow. Without flow restrictor, flow rates for amidites (0.1 M in ACN), Activator, (0.25 M Benzoylthiotetrazole (“BTT”; 30-3070-xx from GlenResearch) in ACN), and Ox (0.02 M 12 in 20% pyridine, 10% water, and 70% THF) were roughly ˜100 uL/sec, for acetonitrile (“ACN”) and capping reagents (1:1 mix of CapA and CapB, wherein CapA is acetic anhydride in THF/Pyridine and CapB is 16% 1-methylimidizole in THF), roughly ˜200 uL/sec, and for Deblock (3% dichloroacetic acid in toluene), roughly 300 uL/sec (compared to ˜50 uL/sec for all reagents with flow restrictor). The time to completely push out Oxidizer was observed, the timing for chemical flow times was adjusted accordingly and an extra ACN wash was introduced between different chemicals. After oligonucleotide synthesis, the chip was deprotected in gaseous ammonia overnight at 75 psi. Five drops of water were applied to the surface to recover oligonucleotides. The recovered oligonucleotides were then analyzed on a BioAnalyzer small RNA chip (data not shown).


Example 3: Synthesis of a 100-Mer Sequence on an Oligonucleotide Synthesis Device

The same process as described in Example 2 for the synthesis of the 50-mer sequence was used for the synthesis of a 100-mer oligonucleotide (“100-mer oligonucleotide”; 5′ CGGGATCCTTATCGTCATCGTCGTACAGATCCCGACCCATTTGCTGTCCACCAGTCATG CTAGCCATACCATGATGATGATGATGATGAGAACCCCGCAT##TTTTTTTTTT3′, where # denotes Thymidine-succinyl hexamide CED phosphoramidite (CLP-2244 from ChemGenes); SEQ ID NO.: 2) on two different silicon chips, the first one uniformly functionalized with N-(3-TRIETHOXYSILYLPROPYL)-4-HYDROXYBUTYRAMIDE and the second one functionalized with 5/95 mix of 11-acetoxyundecyltriethoxysilane and n-decyltriethoxysilane, and the oligonucleotides extracted from the surface were analyzed on a BioAnalyzer instrument (data not shown).


All ten samples from the two chips were further PCR amplified using a forward (5′ATGCGGGGTTCTCATCATC3′; SEQ ID NO.: 3) and a reverse (5′CGGGATCCTTATCGTCATCG3′; SEQ ID NO.: 4) primer in a 50 uL PCR mix (25 uL NEB Q5 mastermix, 2.5 uL 10 uM Forward primer, 2.5 uL 10 uM Reverse primer, 1 uL oligonucleotide extracted from the surface, and water up to 50 uL) using the following thermalcycling program:


98° C., 30 sec


98° C., 10 sec; 63° C., 10 sec; 72° C., 10 sec; repeat 12 cycles


72° C., 2 min


The PCR products were also run on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown), demonstrating sharp peaks at the 100-mer position. Next, the PCR amplified samples were cloned, and Sanger sequenced. Table 6 summarizes the results from the Sanger sequencing for samples taken from spots 1-5 from chip 1 and for samples taken from spots 6-10 from chip 2.













TABLE 6






Spot

Error rate
Cycle efficiency




















1
1/763
bp
99.87%



2
1/824
bp
99.88%



3
1/780
bp
99.87%



4
1/429
bp
99.77%



5
1/1525
bp
99.93%



6
1/1615
bp
99.94%



7
1/531
bp
99.81%



8
1/1769
bp
99.94%



9
1/854
bp
99.88%



10
1/1451
bp
99.93%









Thus, the high quality and uniformity of the synthesized oligonucleotides were repeated on two chips with different surface chemistries. Overall, 89%, corresponding to 233 out of 262 of the 100-mers that were sequenced were perfect sequences with no errors.


Finally, Table 7 summarizes key error characteristics for the sequences obtained from the oligonucleotide samples from spots 1-10.










TABLE 7








Sample ID/Spot no.













OSA_0046/1
OSA_0047/2
OSA_0048/3
OSA_0049/4
OSA_0050/5





Total Sequences
32
32
32
32
32


Sequencing Quality
25 of 28
27 of 27
26 of 30
21 of 23
25 of 26


Oligo Quality
23 of 25
25 of 27
22 of 26
18 of 21
24 of 25


ROI Match Count
2500
2698
2561
2122
2499


ROI Mutation
2
2
1
3
1


ROI Multi
0
0
0
0
0


Base Deletion







ROI Small Insertion
1
0
0
0
0


ROI Single
0
0
0
0
0


Base Deletion







Large Deletion
0
0
1
0
0


Count







Mutation: G > A
2
2
1
2
1


Mutation: T > C
0
0
0
1
0


ROI Error Count
3
2
2
3
1


ROI Error Rate
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1



in 834
in 1350
in 1282
in 708
in 2500


ROI Minus
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1


Primer Error Rate
in 763
in 824
in 780
in 429
in 1525












Sample ID/Spot no.













OSA_0051/6
OSA_0052/7
OSA_0053/8
OSA_0054/9
OSA_0055/10





Total Sequences
32
32
32
32
32


Sequencing Quality
29 of 30
27 of 31
29 of 31
28 of 29
25 of 28


Oligo Quality
25 of 29
22 of 27
28 of 29
26 of 28
20 of 25


ROI Match Count
2666
2625
2899
2798
2348


ROI Mutation
0
2
1
2
1


ROI Multi
0
0
0
0
0


Base Deletion







ROI Small Insertion
0
0
0
0
0


ROI Single
0
0
0
0
0


Base Deletion







Large Deletion
1
1
0
0
0


Count







Mutation: G > A
0
2
1
2
1


Mutation: T > C
0
0
0
0
0


ROI Error Count
1
3
1
2
1


ROI Error Rate
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1
Err: ~1



in 2667
in 876
in 2900
in 1400
in 2349


ROI Minus
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1
MP Err: ~1


Primer Error Rate
in 1615
in 531
in 1769
in 854
in 1451









Example 4: sgRNA Design

A chimera sgRNA sequence with a variable region at the 5′ end was designed for direct sequence specific cleavage by the Cas9 protein. See FIG. 4A. The sgRNA sequence had a base-pairing region of 20 bases for specific DNA binding, which included a seed region of 12 bases. The 5′ end of the base-pairing region was designed to be the transcription start site. 3′ proximal to the base-pairing region was the dCas9 handled region for Cas9 binding, which was 42 bases in length. 3′ proximal to the dCas9 handled region was the S. pyogenes terminator region which was 40 bases in length. The dCas9 handled region and the terminator region each were designed to include sequence that would result in a hairpin structure.


sgRNAs were also designed to target the template (T) or nontemplate (NT) DNA strands, FIGS. 5A-5B. sgRNAs designed for targeting the template DNA strand included a base-pairing region of the sgRNA having the same sequence identity as the transcribed sequence. sgRNAs designed for targeting the nontemplate DNA strand included the base-pairing region of the sgRNA that was a reverse-complement of the transcribed sequence.


In an additional arrangement, a T7 promoter was designed immediately upstream of variable base-pairing region. See FIGS. 6A-6B. The T7 promoter region was added to enable in vitro production of the sgRNA with T7 polymerase.


Example 5: Synthesis of DNA Encoding for sgRNA—Design and Polymerase Analysis

DNA nucleic acids were designed as fragments that, when joined, encode for an sgRNA sequence. FIG. 12. The sgRNAs were designed for inclusion of a T7 promoter immediately upstream of a variable sequence region 1233. Following de novo synthesis of the DNA nucleic acids, an amplification reaction was performed to join and extend overlapping fragments.


Transcription of the DNA nucleic acids at 1201 resulted in in vitro production of the sgRNA with T7 polymerase from a DNA template.


A sequence for Design 1 1220, Design 2 1222, Design 3 1224, and Design 4 1226 was designed as indicated in Table 8. The sequence for each Design 1, Design 2, Design 3, and Design 4 comprises a T7 promoter, a variable sequence portion, and a constant sequence region (the handle and terminator) (Table 8). Specifically, the constant sequence region as seen in FIG. 12 comprises a Cas9 handle hairpin comprising base pairing regions 1211, 1213, 1215, 1217, 1223, and 1225, and a terminator hairpin comprising base pairing regions 1219 and 1221.











TABLE 8





SEQ ID




NO
Name
Sequence







12
Design 1
TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCAGTTGTC




CGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGG




CTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGT




CGGTGCTTTT





13
T7 Promoter of
TAATACGACTCACTATA



Design 1






14
Variable Sequence
GGATGCGCGCAGTTGTCC



of Design 1






15
Handle and
GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGC



Terminator of
TAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTC



Design 1
GGTGCTTTT





44
Design 2
GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCA




GTTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAA




TAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCA




CCGAGTCGGTGCTTTT





13
T7 Promoter of
TAATACGACTCACTATA



Design 2






14
Variable Sequence
GGATGCGCGCAGTTGTCC



of Design 2






15
Handle and
GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGC



Terminator of
TAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTC



Design 2
GGTGCTTTT





16
Design 3
GAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCAG




TTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAAT




AAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCAC




CGAGTCGGTGCTTTT





13
T7 Promoter of
TAATACGACTCACTATA



Design 3






14
Variable Sequence
GGATGCGCGCAGTTGTCC



of Design 3






15
Handle and
GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGC



Terminator of
TAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTC



Design 3
GGTGCTTTT





17
Design 4
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCA




GTTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAA




TAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCA




CCGAGTCGGTGCTTTT





13
T7 Promoter of
TAATACGACTCACTATA



Design 4






14
Variable Sequence
GGATGCGCGCAGTTGTCC



of Design 4






15
Handle and
GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGC



Terminator of
TAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTC



Design 4
GGTGCTTTT









For in vitro analysis, it is noted that the T7 RNA polymerase promoter region should be double stranded for recognition by T7 RNA polymerase. An antisense nucleic acid was used for hybridization: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 18). In addition, Table 9 provides a list of primers that were used for analysis of 4 different sets of template and amplification nucleic acids. See FIG. 12.











TABLE 9





SEQ




ID
Name



NO
(# bases-melting temp.)
Sequence







19
SgR1-R1 (80 bp)
AAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTG




ATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATTTCT




AGCTCTAAAAC





20
SgR1-F1 (58 bp-
TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCAGTTG



51° C./54° C.)
TCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCA





21
SgR1-F2 (65 bp-
GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGC



56° C./56° C.)
AGTTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG





22
SgR1-F3 (66 bp-
GAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCA



59° C./58° C.)
GTTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTT





23
SgR1-F4 (78 bp-
GAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGATGCGCGCA



62° C./62° C.)
GTTGTCCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAA




AATAAGG





24
SgR1-AR1 (14 bp-52° C.)
AAAAGCACCGACTC





25
SgR1-AR2 (15 bp-56° C.)
AAAAGCACCGACTCG





26
SgR1-AR3 (16 bp-60° C.)
AAAAGCACCGACTCGG





27
SgR1-AR4 (17 bp-62° C.)
AAAAGCACCGACTCGGT





18
sgR1-AF1 (19 bp-51° C.)
TAATACGACTCACTATAGG





28
SgR1-AF2 (24 bp-56° C.)
GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGG





29
SgR1-AF3 (25 bp-59° C.)
GAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGG





30
SgR1-AF4 (25 bp-62° C.)
GCGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGG









The 4 different sets of template and amplification nucleic acids were analyzed under a variety of condition to optimize purity and yield of the full length template. 10 ul PCR reactions were performed with the template nucleic acids (SgR1-R1 & SgR1-F1, SgR1-F2, SgR1-F3, SgR1-F4) at 100 fMol and the respective sets of amplification primers at Polymerase-1 PCR concentration of 600 nMol. Using the gradient on the Eppendorf Mastercycler, 3 annealing temps (50° C., 55° C., 60° C.) were evaluated in a 25 cycle PCR using two high fidelity DNA polymerases (polymerase 1 and 3) and standard DNA polymerase (polymerase 2). Table 10 provides a summary of reaction conditions and Table 11 provides the amplification protocol.












TABLE 10








Pol. 1
Pol. 2
Pol. 3













Reagents (10 ul rxns)
1x
15x
1x
15x
1x
15x
















Pol
0.1
1.5
0.1
1.5
0.1
1.5


Buffer
2
30
1
15
2
30


dNTP's
0.2
3
0.2
3
0.2
3


Amp Primers (10
0.6

0.6

0.6



uM)








Template Oligos (100
1

1

1



nM)








H2O
6.1
91.5
7.1
106.5
6.1
91.5


Total
10
150
10
150
10
150

















TABLE 11





Polymerase 1, 2
Polymerase 3




















98
30 sec

95

3 min




98
10 sec
25x
98
10 sec
25x


50/55/60
15 sec

50/55/60
15 sec



72
10 sec

72
10 sec



72
30 sec

72
30 sec



 4
hold

 4
hold









Results from Polymerase-1 PCR reactions were run on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown) to estimate the yield, and are summarized in Table 12. DNA yield is presented in ng/ul (Table 12). Nucleic acid designs 3 and 4 each resulted in higher DNA yield than nucleic acid designs 1 and 2. Higher annealing temperatures resulted in increased yield as well, with 60° C. having higher yields.













TABLE 12






Polymerase 1
50° C.
55° C.
60° C.




















Nucleic acid design 1
0
0
0



Nucleic acid design 2
2.9
4.5
3.7



Nucleic acid design 3
6.8
9.2
10



Nucleic acid design 4
9.9
13
15.3





Yields listed in ng/ul.






Results from the Polymerase 2 PCR reactions were run on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown) to estimate the yield, and are summarized in Table 13. DNA yield is presented in ng/ul (Table 13). Again, nucleic acid designs 3 and 4 each resulted in higher DNA yield than nucleic acid designs 1 and 2. Higher annealing temperatures resulted in increased yield as well, with 60° C. having higher yields.













TABLE 13






Polymerase 2
50° C.
55° C.
60° C.




















Nucleic acid design 1
0
0
0



Nucleic acid design 2
7.6
5.9
6.9



Nucleic acid design 3
6.1
8.5
10.5



Nucleic acid design 4
7.4
11.1
19.4





Yields listed in ng/ul.






Results from the Polymerase 3 PCR reactions were run on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown) to estimate the yield, and are summarized in Table 14. DNA yield is presented in ng/ul (Table 14). Nucleic acid designs 3 and 4 each resulted in higher DNA yield than nucleic acid designs 1 and 2. Higher annealing temperatures resulted in increased yield as well, with 60° C. having higher yields.













TABLE 14






Polymerase 3
50° C.
55° C.
60° C.




















Nucleic acid design 1
10
13
12.1



Nucleic acid design 2
12.4
14.3
15.9



Nucleic acid design 3
13.2
26.1
28.8



Nucleic acid design 4
16.1
13.2
18.5





Yields listed in ng/ul.






In sum, nucleic acid designs 3 and 4 resulted in increased DNA yield with all three polymerases. In addition, the higher annealing temperature of 60° C. resulted in increased DNA yield.


Example 6: CRISPR sgRNA Synthesis—Temperature Analysis

Using nucleic acid primers from Example 5, the impact of increase annealing temperature conditions was analyzed after running a PCR reaction as described in Example 5. Amplification product was run on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown) to estimate the yield, and is summarized in Table 15. DNA yield is presented in ng/ul (Table 15). In sum, Polymerase 3 provides increased DNA yield and 60° C. annealing temperature resulted in an increased DNA yield.











TABLE 15








Nucleic Acid design 3
Nucleic Acid design 4












Polymerase 3
Polymerase 1
Polymerase 3
Polymerase 1
















60° C.
65° C.
60° C.
65° C.
60° C.
65° C.
60° C.
65° C.





25 cycles
27.3
15.2
11.6
3.9
28.4
29.5
13.8
10.2





Yields listed in ng/ul.






Example 7: sgRNA Generation—Structure Free RNA

Two assembly nucleic acids were designed to generate a modified sgRNA template (120 bp) with T7 promoter sequence and terminator, but without the tracrRNA hairpin containing sequence. See Table 16.











TABLE 16





SEQ




ID




NO
Name
Sequence







31
sgR2-
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGCACAACGTGG



Template
AGGATGGCAGCGTGCAGCTGGCTGATCACTACCAGC




AAAACACTCCAATCGGTGATGGTCCTGTTGCACCGA




GTCGGTGCTTTT





32
sgR2-F
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGCACAACGTGG




AGGATGGCAGCGTGCAGCTGGCTGATCACTACCAG





33
sgR2-R
AAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCAACAGGACCATCACCGAT




TGGAGTGTTTTGCTGGTAGTGATCAGCCAGCTG









The assembly nucleic acids were amplified with same primer nucleic acids used to amplify the sgRNA in Example 5. The reaction conditions used are summarized in Table 17.













TABLE 17





Ingredients
1x
PCR Condition
Time
Cycles



















Pol 1
0.1
95° C.

3 min




Buffer
2
98° C.
10 sec
25 x


dNTP's
0.2
65° C.
15 sec



Amp Primers (10 um)
0.6
72° C.
10 sec



Template Oligos
1
72° C.
30 sec



(100 nm)






H2O
6.1
 4° C.
hold



Total
10









Transcription with T7 RNA polymerase was expected to yield an RNA product of 80 bp, devoid of secondary structure. Transcription of the amplification product was carried out with an in vitro transcription kit (NEB HiScribe). The reaction mixture was analyzed on a BioAnalyzer. See FIGS. 13A-13B. The modified sgRNA product was cleaner with the structure free design (FIG. 13B) than the sgRNA having the tracrRNA hairpin containing sequence (FIG. 13A).


Example 8: sgRNA Directed Cas9 Cleavage

Three sgRNA sequences were designed with a T7 promoter region and each with a different recognition sequence for regions of a 720 bp GFP encoding sequence. Each of the sgRNA sequences was assembled from PCR of two nucleic acids. The sgRNA backbone and primers are provided in Table 18.











TABLE 18





SEQ ID NO
Name
Sequence







34
sgRNA
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAggNNNNNNNNNNNN



backbone
NNNNNNGTTTTAGAGCTATGCTGAAAAGCATAGCAA




GTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAG




TGGCACCGAGTCGGTGCTTTT





35
GFP
ATGcgtAAAggcGAAgagCTGttcACTggtGTCgtcCCTattCTG




gtgGAActgGATggtGATgtcAACggtCATaagTTTtccGTGcgtG




GCgagGGTgaaGGTgacGCAactAATggtAAActgACGctgAAG




ttcATCtgtACTactGGTaaaCTGccgGTAcctTGGccgACTctgGT




AacgACGctgACTtatGGTgttCAGtgcTTTgctCGTtatCCGgacC




ATatgAAGcagCATgacTTCttcAAGtccGCCatgCCGgaaGGCta




tGTGcagGAAcgcACGattTCCtttAAGgatGACggcACGtacAA




AacgCGTgcgGAAgtgAAAtttGAAggcGATaccCTGgtaAACcg




cATTgagCTGaaaGGCattGACtttAAAgaaGACggcAATatcCT




GggcCATaagCTGgaaTACaatTTTaacAGCcacAATgttTACatc




ACCgccGATaaaCAAaaaAATggcATTaaaGCGaatTTTaaaAT




TcgcCACaacGTGgagGATggcAGCgtgCAGctgGCTgatCACta




cCAGcaaAACactCCAatcGGTgatGGTcctGTTctgCTGccaGA




CaatCACtatCTGagcACGcaaAGCgttCTGtctAAAgatCCGaac




GAGaaaCGCgatCATatgGTTctgCTGgagTTCgtaACCgcaGCG




ggcATCacgCATggtATGgatGAActgTACaaaTGAtaa





36
sgR35-F
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAAcgcACGattTCCttt




AGTTTTAGAGCTATGCTGAAAAGCATAGC





37
sgR36-F
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGCattGACtttAAAgaaG




AGTTTTAGAGCTATGCTGAAAAGCATAGC





38
sgR37-F
CGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGagGATggcAGCgtgC




AGcGTTTTAGAGCTATGCTGAAAAGCATAGC





39
sgR3-R
AAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTGATA




ACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATGCTTTTCAGC




ATAGCTCTAAAAC





30
SgR1-AF4
GCGAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGG





27
SgR1-AR4
AAAAGCACCGACTCGGT









The assembly nucleic acids were amplified under reaction conditions summarized in Table 19.













TABLE 19





Ingredients
1x
PCR Condition
Time
Cycles



















Polymerase 3
0.1
95° C.
  3 min



Buffer
2
98° C.
10 sec
25 x


dNTP's
0.2
95° C.
15 sec



Amp Primers (10 um)
0.6
60° C.
15 sec



Template Oligos (100 nm)
1
72° C.
10 sec



H2O
6.1
72° C.
30 sec



Total
10
 4° C.
hold









Samples from each sgRNA assembly reaction were analyzed on a BioAnalyzer (FIGS. 14A-14C). Transcription reactions using T7 RNA polymerase PCR amplification product were conducted. Samples from each reaction were analyzed on a BioAnalyzer (FIGS. 14D-14F).


Cas9 digests were prepared using GFP amplification product, Cas9 and the transcribed sgRNA. 2 peaks were observed for all three digests, compared to a single peak for the control. (FIGS. 14G-14J). Expected and resultant fragments from Cas9 cleavage using the 3 synthesized sgRNAs are listed Table 20.













TABLE 20






Predicted
Resultant
Predicted
Resultant


sgRNA
Fragment 1
Fragment 1
Fragment 2
Fragment 2



















sgR35
321
324
439
451


sgR36
342
350
418
430


sgR37
208
137
552
560









Cas9 digestion samples were purified and analyzed again on a BioAnalyzer (data not shown). Results from purified samples are summarized in Table 21.













TABLE 21






Predicted
Resultant
Predicted
Resultant


sgRNA
Fragment 1
Fragment 1
Fragment 2
Fragment 2



















sgR35
321
323
439
451


sgR36
342
353
418
427


sgR37
208
220
552
560









Example 9: Parallel Assembly of 29,040 Unique Oligonucleotides

A structure comprising 256 clusters 1505 each comprising 121 loci on a flat silicon plate was manufactured as shown in FIG. 15. An expanded view of a cluster is shown in 1510 with 121 loci. Loci from 240 of the 256 clusters provided an attachment and support for the synthesis of oligonucleotides having distinct sequences. Oligonucleotide synthesis was performed by phosphoramidite chemistry using general methods from Example 3. Loci from 16 of the 256 clusters were control clusters. The global distribution of the 29,040 unique oligonucleotides synthesized (240 non-control clusters×121 oligonucleotide populations per cluster) is shown in FIG. 16A. NGS sequencing confirmed 100% representation of designed oligonucleotides selected for synthesis. Distribution was measured for each cluster, as shown in FIG. 16B. The distribution of unique oligonucleotides synthesized in 4 representative clusters is shown in FIG. 17. On a global level, all oligonucleotides the designed for synthesis were present and 99% of the oligonucleotides had abundance that was within 2× of the mean, indicating high synthesis uniformity. This same observation was consistent on a per-cluster level.


The error rate for each oligonucleotide was determined using an Illumina MiSeq gene sequencer. The error rate distribution for the 29,040 unique oligonucleotides is shown in FIG. 18A and averages around 1 in 500 bases, with some error rates as low as 1 in 800 bases. Distribution was measured for each cluster, as shown in FIG. 18B. The error rate distribution for unique oligonucleotides in four representative clusters is shown in FIG. 19. The library of 29,040 unique oligonucleotides was synthesized in less than 20 hours. Analysis of GC percentage v. oligonucleotide representation across all of the 29,040 unique oligonucleotides showed thatsynthesis was uniform despite GC content (roughly 20% to 85% GC per oligonucleotide), FIG. 20.


Example 10: PCR Amplification Analysis of De Novo Synthesized DNA Library Encoding for sgRNAs

9,996 oligonucleotides 100 bases in length of randomized sequences with varying GC content, from 20-80% GC were designed and synthesized on a structure with a similar arrangement is described in Example 9. To determine the effect of PCR amplification on GC representation, the oligonucleotide population was amplified for either 6 or 20 cycles with a high fidelity DNA polymerase (DNA polymerase 1). Alternatively, the oligonucleotide population was amplified using two other high-fidelity PCR enzymes for 6, 8, 10, or 15 cycles, to determine whether polymerase selection had an effect on overall sequence representation post-amplification. Following PCR amplification, samples were prepped for next generation sequencing and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. 150 base pair SE reads were generated to an approximate read coverage of 100×. Raw FASTQ files were analyzed. Oligonucleotide representation with either polymerase for 6, 10 or 15 cycles is depicted in FIG. 21. Oligonucleotide uniformity measured by frequency of representation in sequencing reads was assessed for the various conditions and is summarized in Table 22.












TABLE 22






Cycles
% within 1.5x
% within 2x




















Polymerase 1
6
72.1%
92.6%




8
76.1%
90.3%




10
70.9%
86.6%




15
64.1%
82.7%



Polymerase 2
6
91.9%
98.9%




8
89.9%
98.1%




10
90.1%
98.4%




15
89.2%
97.9%









The number of dropouts for each amplified oligonucleotide population was quantified as shown in FIG. 22, amplification cycles v. fraction of population below a 10% of mean threshold. Polymerase 1 dropouts grew quickly whereas Polymerase 2 dropouts stayed relatively constant.


The impact of over amplification on GC distribution was assessed, FIG. 23. Generally, oligonucleotides with a GC content 30% to 70% followed the trend line, Y═X, and increased in frequency with more cycles. Oligonucleotides with a GC content greater than 70% were, generally, slightly more frequent after 20 cycles, while oligonucleotides with a GC content lower than 30% were, generally, slightly more frequent after 6 cycles.


Example 11: Human Epigenetic CRISPR Screen

A sgRNA screen was performed to introduce mutations into exons that encode functional domains using CRISPR-Cas9. About 10,000 DNA oligonucleotides were de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement is described in Example 9. Collectively, the oligonucleotides had an aggregated error rate of about 1:500 or lower. Each oligonucleotide was up to 200 bases in length, and at least 1 fmole per an oligonucleotide species was generated. The oligonucleotides were PCR amplified, cloned into vectors, and electroporated into cultured cells for sgRNA transcription. Nucleic acids were isolated from the cells and sequenced, using next generation sequencing.


Sequencing results showed highly accurate and uniform library synthesis with minimal bias and high fidelity production of sgRNAs. More reads per guide sequence with minimal sequencing 30% higher recovery of sgRNA with correct sequence for downstream screening compared to a commercially available pool. See Table 23. Pooled sequencing results showed more reads per guide sequence and a much tighter distribution of reads (4 logs) compared to 6 logs with the array based commercially available pool. See FIGS. 24A-24B. Sequencing validation of clones showed 100% sgRNA recovery (FIG. 24A) and higher sequence accuracy compared to a commercially available array-based pool (FIG. 24B). Of the clones that were sequenced, significantly more were recovered with the correct sgRNA sequence. See Table 23. 100% of the predetermined sequences were represented in the oligonucleotide population. NGS-based validation of sgRNA clones showed 100% sgRNA recovery and 13% higher accuracy of synthesis per clone compared to the commercially available population (data not shown).











TABLE 23






Synthesized oligo
Commercially available



population
oligo population







sgRNA oligos recovered
100%
>95.5%


Correct sequence rate
about 87%
about 74%


(MiSeq)




Correct sequence (Sanger
about 100%
about 70%


10 clones)




Ave reads per sgRNA in
about 256
about 1024


cloned oligo population




(100x normalized)









Example 12: Whole Genome sgRNA Library

A DNA library was designed to include DNAs encoding for sgRNAs for generating clones for 101,000 different oligonucleotides (5 sgRNAs per 20200 gene targets). 101,000 oligonucleotides were de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement is described in Example 9. The synthesized oligonucleotides were PCR amplified, digested and cloned into lentiviral vectors, and transformed into cells. Nucleic acids were isolated from the cells and sequenced, using next generation sequencing. Alternatively, the synthesized oligonucleotides were PCR amplified to form an amplicon-based library and sequenced.


A plot of next generation sequencing reads v. number of sgRNAs recovered shows that as the oligonucleotide pool size increases, the oligonucleotide population maintained a more uniform tighter distribution of reads across the entire library, with a minimal tail compared to a commercially available array-based reference oligonucleotide population. FIG. 25.


Example 13. Design of sgRNA Libraries with Improved Targeting and Activity

sgRNA libraries were designed and de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement is described in Example 9. The synthesized oligonucleotides were PCR amplified, digested and cloned into vectors, and transferred into cells for use for downstream applications including screening and analysis.


Different sgRNA design parameters were compared including libraries characterized by a NAG PAM, a NGG PAM, high activity, low off-target, and filtered. The sgRNA library designed by methods described herein provided for a higher percentage of sgRNAs resulting in at least 2-fold depletion of gene expression, around 16% of sgRNAs, compared to other commercially available gRNA systems. FIG. 26A. The sgRNA libraries also provided for a lower percentage of sgRNAs resulting in zero or negative depletion of gene expression, around 17%, compared to other commercially available gRNA systems. FIG. 26B.


sgRNA-mediated depletion was assessed for essential gene expression levels as well, where the following genes were targeted by sgRNAs: PCNA, PSMA7, RPP21, and SF3B3. Analyzing the number of sgRNAs that exhibited at least 2-fold depletion, the sgRNA library had a higher percentage sgRNAs depleting essential genes as compared to Comparator 1, Comparator 2, and Comparator 3. See Table 24.













TABLE 24






Comparator
Comparator
Comparator
CRISPR


Gene Name
1
2
3
Library







PCNA
1/5
2/6
5/9
5/5


PSMA7
1/5
0/6
2/9
3/5


RPP21
3/5
1/6
4/9
2/5


SF3B3
0/5
0/6
4/9
3/5


Average (%)
25%
12.5%
42%
65%









Example 14. sgRNA Library for MS2

A DNA library comprising non-identical DNA sequences encoding for sgRNAs was designed for sequence specific cleavage by the C2c2 protein. The library comprised all possible spacer sequences for C2c2 targeting of bacteriophage MS2 genome. Because mature crRNAs of C2c2 from Leptotrichia shahii comprises a maximum spacer length of 28 nucleotides, tiling all possible 28 nucleotide target sites in the bacteriophage genome resulted in a library of about 3500 spacer sequences.


About 3500 non-identical oligonucleotides were de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement is described in Example 9. The library of about 3500 sequences were inserted into vectors and transformed into E. coli. E. coli cells were infected with MS2 bacteriophage using three dilutions of MS2. The library was then screened for sequences that conferred E. coli resistance to MS2 infection.


A number of spacer sequences were found to confer resistance. Comparing spacer representation (crRNA frequencies), many spacer sequences exhibited more than 1.25 log2-fold enrichment in the three dilutions of MS2 infection whereas no non-targeting spacer sequences were found to be enriched.


Example 15: sgRNA Library for Zebrafish

A DNA library is designed with sequences encoding for about 130,000 sgRNAs. On average, about 5 sgRNAs templates are designed for each zebrafish gene. The oligonucleotides are de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement as described in Example 9. De novo synthesis produces the 130,000 oligonucleotides, each extending from a different locus on the surface of a silicon plate. The oligonucleotides are removed from the plate, amplified by PCR, and cloned into expression vectors. Each template is subject to sequencing. The sgRNA library is injected into zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish are raised to adulthood. Sperm are then cryopreserved and screened by sequencing to identify the sequence of germline transmitted insertions and deletions. Following the germline screen, sperm are genotyped by competitive allele-specific PCR.


Example 16: gRNA Library for Mouse

A DNA library is designed with sequences encoding for about 100,000 sgRNAs. On average, about 5 sgRNAs templates are designed per mouse gene. The oligonucleotides are de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement as described in Example 9. A sgRNA library encoding for the sgRNA sequences is de novo synthesized to generate 100,000 oligonucleotides. De novo synthesis produces the 100,000 oligonucleotides, each extending from a different locus on the surface of a silicon plate. The oligonucleotides are removed from the plate, amplified by PCR, and cloned into vectors. Each template is subject to sequencing. sgRNA on-target efficiency is verified by surveyor nuclease assay or sequencing. sgRNAs are then microinjected in mouse zygotes with a desired genetic background. Alternately, following verification of sgRNA efficiency, sgRNAs are packaged into viral vectors such as adeno-associated viruses (AAVs). sgRNAs are then stereotactically delivered into mice at a desired location. Expression levels for the preselected target genes are observed in tissue collected from mice.


Example 17: gRNA Library for a Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

A DNA nucleic acid library is designed with sequences encoding for 5 sgRNAs targeting genes for 58 human receptor tyrosine kinases listed in Table 25, totaling 290 different DNA nucleic acids. The nucleic acids are de novo synthesized using methods similar to those described in Example 3 on a silicon chip as described in Example 1 on a structure with a similar arrangement as described in Example 9. The oligonucleotides are removed from the plate, amplified by PCR, cloned into vectors, and transferred into preselected populations of cells. Expression levels for the preselected genes listed in Table 25 are compared in each preselected populations of cells against a control population of cells exposed to a control vector without the kinase-specific sgRNA.












TABLE 25






Gene
Hs NT ACC #
Hs PROT ACC#








ALK
NM_004304
NP_004295



LTK
NM_002344
NP_002335



AXL
NM_001699
NP_001690



MER
NM_006343
NP_006334



TYRO3
NM_006293
NP_006284



DDR1
NM_013993
NP_001945



DDR2
NM_006182
NP_006173



EGFR
NM_005228
NP_005219



ERBB2
NM_004448
NP_004439



ERBB3
NM_001982
NP_001973



ERBB4
NM_005235
NP_005226



EPHA1
NM_005232
NP_005223



EPHA2
NM_004431
NP_004422



EPHA3
NM_005233
NP_005224



EPHA4
NM_004438
NP_004429



EPHA5
L36644
P54756



EPHA6
AL133666




EPHA7
NM_004440
NP_004431



EPHA8
AB040892
CAB81612



EPHB1
NM_004441
NP_004432



EPHB2
AF025304
AAB94602



EPHB3
NM_004443
NP_004434



EPHB4
NM_004444
NP_004435



EPHB6
NM_004445
NP_004436



EPHX





FGFR1
M34641
AAA35835



FGFR2
NM_000141
NP_000132



FGFR3
NM_000142
NP_000133



FGFR4
NM_002011
NP_002002



IGF1R
NM_000875
NP_000866



INSR
NM_000208
NP_000199



INSRR
J05046
AAC31759



MET
NM_000245
NP_000236



RON
NM_002447
NP_002438



MUSK
NM_005592
NP_005583



CSF1R
NM_005211
NP_005202



FLT3
NM_004119
NP_0041110



KIT
NM_000222
NP_000213



PDGFRA
NM_006206
NP_006197



PDGFRB
NM_002609
NP_002600



PTK7
NM_002821
NP_002812



RET
X12949
P07949



ROR1
NM_005012
NP_005003



ROR2
NM_004560
NP_004551



ROS1
NM_002944
NP_002935



RYK
S59184
AAB26341



TEK
NM_000459
NP_000450



TIE
NM_005424
NP_005415



NTRK1
NM_002529
NP_002520



NTRK2
NM_006180
NP_006171



NTRK3
NM_002530
NP_002521



VEGFR1
NM_002019
NP_002010



VEGFR2

AAB88005



VEGFR3
NM_002020
NP_002011



AATYK
NM_004920
NP_004911



AATYK2
NM_014916
NP_055731



AATYK3





DKFZp761P1010
NM_018423
NP_060893









Example 18: gRNA Library for Human Kinome

A DNA nucleic acid library is designed with sequences encoding for 5 sgRNAs targeting genes for 518 human kinases, totaling 2,590 different DNA nucleic acids. The oligonucleotides are removed from the plate, amplified by PCR, cloned into vectors, and transferred into preselected populations of cells. Expression levels for the preselected 518 genes are compared in each preselected populations of cells against a control population of cells exposed to a control vector without the kinase-specific sgRNA.


Example 19: gRNA Library for Human Phosphatome

A DNA nucleic acid library is designed with sequences encoding for 5 sgRNAs targeting genes for 200 human phosphatases, totaling 1000 different DNA nucleic acids. The nucleic acids are removed from the plate, amplified by PCR, cloned into vectors, and transferred into preselected populations of cells. Expression levels for the 200 preselected genes are compared in each preselected populations of cells against a control population of cells exposed to a control vector without the kinase-specific sgRNA.


While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Claims
  • 1. A method for synthesis of a gRNA library, comprising: (a) providing predetermined sequences for at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a different gRNA;(b) providing a surface, wherein the surface comprises clusters of loci for nucleic acid extension reaction;(c) synthesizing a nucleic acid library comprising the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule extends from the surface, and wherein at least about 80% of the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are each present in the nucleic acid library in an amount within 2× of a mean frequency for each of the non-identical DNA molecules in the library; and(d) transferring the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules into cells capable of generating the gRNA library transcribed from the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the clusters comprises about 50 to about 500 loci.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule comprises up to about 200 bases in length.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule encodes for a single gRNA or a dual gRNA.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells are prokaryotic cells.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells are eukaryotic cells.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells are mammalian cells.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the cells comprises an exogenous nuclease enzyme.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule further comprises a vector sequence.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule has a GC base content of 20% to 85%.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein each non-identical DNA molecule has a GC base content of 30% to 70%.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein at least 96% of the gRNAs encoded by the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules are present in the gRNA library.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises at least 2000 non-identical DNA molecules.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least 500 non-identical DNA molecules comprises at least 100,000 non-identical DNA molecules.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the gRNA targets genes in a biological pathway.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the gRNA targets genes in an entire genome.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/682,100, filed Aug. 21, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/419,881, filed on Nov. 9, 2016; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/411,388, filed on Oct. 21, 2016; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/393,948, filed on Sep. 13, 2016; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/382,191, filed on Aug. 31, 2016; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/378,134, filed on Aug. 22, 2016, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (961)
Number Name Date Kind
3549368 Robert et al. Dec 1970 A
3920714 Streck Nov 1975 A
4123661 Wolf et al. Oct 1978 A
4415732 Caruthers et al. Nov 1983 A
4613398 Chiong et al. Sep 1986 A
4726877 Fryd et al. Feb 1988 A
4808511 Holmes Feb 1989 A
4837401 Hirose et al. Jun 1989 A
4863557 Kokaku et al. Sep 1989 A
4981797 Jessee et al. Jan 1991 A
4988617 Landegren et al. Jan 1991 A
5102797 Tucker et al. Apr 1992 A
5118605 Urdea Jun 1992 A
5137814 Rashtchian et al. Aug 1992 A
5143854 Pirrung et al. Sep 1992 A
5242794 Whiteley et al. Sep 1993 A
5242974 Holmes Sep 1993 A
5288514 Ellman Feb 1994 A
5291897 Gastrin et al. Mar 1994 A
5299491 Kawada Apr 1994 A
5384261 Winkler et al. Jan 1995 A
5387541 Hodge et al. Feb 1995 A
5395753 Prakash Mar 1995 A
5431720 Nagai et al. Jul 1995 A
5445934 Fodor et al. Aug 1995 A
5449754 Nishioka Sep 1995 A
5459039 Modrich et al. Oct 1995 A
5474796 Brennan Dec 1995 A
5476930 Letsinger et al. Dec 1995 A
5487993 Herrnstadt et al. Jan 1996 A
5494810 Barany et al. Feb 1996 A
5501893 Laermer et al. Mar 1996 A
5508169 Deugau et al. Apr 1996 A
5510270 Fodor et al. Apr 1996 A
5514789 Kempe May 1996 A
5527681 Holmes Jun 1996 A
5530516 Sheets Jun 1996 A
5556750 Modrich et al. Sep 1996 A
5586211 Dumitrou et al. Dec 1996 A
5641658 Adams et al. Jun 1997 A
5677195 Winkler et al. Oct 1997 A
5679522 Modrich et al. Oct 1997 A
5683879 Laney et al. Nov 1997 A
5688642 Chrisey et al. Nov 1997 A
5700637 Southern Dec 1997 A
5700642 Monforte et al. Dec 1997 A
5702894 Modrich et al. Dec 1997 A
5707806 Shuber Jan 1998 A
5712124 Walker Jan 1998 A
5739386 Holmes Apr 1998 A
5750672 Kempe May 1998 A
5780613 Letsinger et al. Jul 1998 A
5830643 Yamamoto et al. Nov 1998 A
5830655 Monforte et al. Nov 1998 A
5830662 Soares et al. Nov 1998 A
5834252 Stemmer et al. Nov 1998 A
5843669 Kaiser et al. Dec 1998 A
5843767 Beattie Dec 1998 A
5846717 Brow et al. Dec 1998 A
5854033 Lizardi Dec 1998 A
5858754 Modrich et al. Jan 1999 A
5861482 Modrich et al. Jan 1999 A
5863801 Southgate et al. Jan 1999 A
5869245 Yeung Feb 1999 A
5877280 Wetmur Mar 1999 A
5882496 Northrup et al. Mar 1999 A
5922539 Modrich et al. Jul 1999 A
5922593 Livingston Jul 1999 A
5928907 Woudenberg et al. Jul 1999 A
5962272 Chenchik et al. Oct 1999 A
5976842 Wurst Nov 1999 A
5976846 Passmore et al. Nov 1999 A
5989872 Luo et al. Nov 1999 A
5994069 Hall et al. Nov 1999 A
6001567 Brow et al. Dec 1999 A
6008031 Modrich et al. Dec 1999 A
6013440 Lipshutz et al. Jan 2000 A
6015674 Woudenberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6017434 Simpson et al. Jan 2000 A
6020481 Benson et al. Feb 2000 A
6027898 Gjerde et al. Feb 2000 A
6028189 Blanchard Feb 2000 A
6028198 Liu et al. Feb 2000 A
6040138 Lockhart et al. Mar 2000 A
6077674 Schleifer et al. Jun 2000 A
6087482 Teng et al. Jul 2000 A
6090543 Prudent et al. Jul 2000 A
6090606 Kaiser et al. Jul 2000 A
6103474 Dellinger et al. Aug 2000 A
6107038 Choudhary et al. Aug 2000 A
6110682 Dellinger et al. Aug 2000 A
6114115 Wagner, Jr. Sep 2000 A
6130045 Wurst et al. Oct 2000 A
6132997 Shannon Oct 2000 A
6136568 Hiatt et al. Oct 2000 A
6171797 Perbost Jan 2001 B1
6180351 Cattell Jan 2001 B1
6201112 Ach Mar 2001 B1
6218118 Sampson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221653 Caren et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222030 Dellinger et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232072 Fisher May 2001 B1
6235483 Wolber et al. May 2001 B1
6242266 Schleifer et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251588 Shannon et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251595 Gordon et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251685 Dorsel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258454 Lefkowitz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262490 Hsu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274725 Sanghvi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284465 Wolber Sep 2001 B1
6287776 Hefti Sep 2001 B1
6287824 Lizardi Sep 2001 B1
6297017 Schmidt et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300137 Earhart et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306599 Perbost Oct 2001 B1
6309822 Fodor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309828 Schleifer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312911 Bancroft et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319674 Fulcrand et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323043 Caren et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329210 Schleifer Dec 2001 B1
6346423 Schembri Feb 2002 B1
6365355 McCutchen-Maloney Apr 2002 B1
6372483 Schleifer et al. Apr 2002 B2
6375903 Cerrina et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376285 Joyner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384210 Blanchard May 2002 B1
6387636 Perbost et al. May 2002 B1
6399394 Dahm et al. Jun 2002 B1
6399516 Ayon Jun 2002 B1
6403314 Lange et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406849 Dorsel et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406851 Bass Jun 2002 B1
6408308 Maslyn et al. Jun 2002 B1
6419883 Blanchard Jul 2002 B1
6428957 Delenstarr Aug 2002 B1
6440669 Bass et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444268 Lefkowitz et al. Sep 2002 B2
6446642 Caren et al. Sep 2002 B1
6446682 Viken Sep 2002 B1
6451998 Perbost Sep 2002 B1
6458526 Schembri et al. Oct 2002 B1
6458535 Hall et al. Oct 2002 B1
6458583 Bruhn et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461812 Barth et al. Oct 2002 B2
6461816 Wolber et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469156 Schafer et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472147 Janda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6492107 Kauffman et al. Dec 2002 B1
6518056 Schembri et al. Feb 2003 B2
6521427 Evans Feb 2003 B1
6521453 Crameri et al. Feb 2003 B1
6555357 Kaiser et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558908 Wolber et al. May 2003 B2
6562611 Kaiser et al. May 2003 B1
6566495 Fodor et al. May 2003 B1
6582908 Fodor et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582938 Su et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586211 Staehler et al. Jul 2003 B1
6587579 Bass Jul 2003 B1
6589739 Fisher Jul 2003 B2
6599693 Webb Jul 2003 B1
6602472 Zimmermann et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610978 Yin et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613513 Parce et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613523 Fischer Sep 2003 B2
6613560 Tso et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613893 Webb Sep 2003 B1
6621076 Van et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630581 Dellinger et al. Oct 2003 B2
6632641 Brennan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6635226 Tso et al. Oct 2003 B1
6642373 Manoharan et al. Nov 2003 B2
6649348 Bass et al. Nov 2003 B2
6660338 Hargreaves Dec 2003 B1
6664112 Mulligan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670127 Evans Dec 2003 B2
6670461 Wengel et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673552 Frey Jan 2004 B2
6682702 Barth et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689319 Fisher et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692917 Neri et al. Feb 2004 B2
6702256 Killeen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706471 Brow et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706875 Goldberg et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709852 Bloom et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709854 Donahue et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713262 Gillibolian et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716629 Hess et al. Apr 2004 B2
6716634 Myerson Apr 2004 B1
6723509 Ach Apr 2004 B2
6728129 Lindsey et al. Apr 2004 B2
6743585 Dellinger et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753145 Holcomb et al. Jun 2004 B2
6768005 Mellor et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770748 Imanishi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6770892 Corson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773676 Schembri Aug 2004 B2
6773888 Li et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780982 Lyamichev et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787308 Balasubramanian et al. Sep 2004 B2
6789965 Barth et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790620 Bass et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794499 Wengel et al. Sep 2004 B2
6796634 Caren et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800439 McGall et al. Oct 2004 B1
6814846 Berndt Nov 2004 B1
6815218 Jacobson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824866 Glazer et al. Nov 2004 B1
6830890 Lockhart et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833246 Balasubramanian Dec 2004 B2
6833450 McGall et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835938 Ghosh et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838888 Peck Jan 2005 B2
6841131 Zimmermann et al. Jan 2005 B2
6845968 Killeen et al. Jan 2005 B2
6846454 Peck Jan 2005 B2
6846922 Manoharan et al. Jan 2005 B1
6852850 Myerson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6858720 Myerson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879915 Cattell Apr 2005 B2
6880576 Karp et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884580 Caren et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887715 Schembri May 2005 B2
6890723 Perbost et al. May 2005 B2
6890760 Webb May 2005 B1
6893816 Beattie May 2005 B1
6897023 Fu et al. May 2005 B2
6900047 Bass May 2005 B2
6900048 Perbost May 2005 B2
6911611 Wong et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914229 Corson et al. Jul 2005 B2
6916113 De et al. Jul 2005 B2
6916633 Shannon Jul 2005 B1
6919181 Hargreaves Jul 2005 B2
6927029 Lefkowitz et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929951 Corson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936472 Earhart et al. Aug 2005 B2
6938476 Chesk Sep 2005 B2
6939673 Bass et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943036 Bass Sep 2005 B2
6946285 Bass Sep 2005 B2
6950756 Kincaid Sep 2005 B2
6951719 Dupret et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958119 Yin et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960464 Jessee et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969449 Maher et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969488 Bridgham et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976384 Hobbs et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977223 George et al. Dec 2005 B2
6987263 Hobbs et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989267 Kim et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991922 Dupret et al. Jan 2006 B2
7008037 Caren et al. Mar 2006 B2
7025324 Slocum et al. Apr 2006 B1
7026124 Barth et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027930 Cattell Apr 2006 B2
7028536 Karp et al. Apr 2006 B2
7029854 Collins et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034290 Lu et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041445 Chenchik et al. May 2006 B2
7045289 Allawi et al. May 2006 B2
7051574 Peck May 2006 B2
7052841 Delenstarr May 2006 B2
7062385 White et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064197 Rabbani et al. Jun 2006 B1
7070932 Leproust et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075161 Barth Jul 2006 B2
7078167 Delenstarr et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078505 Bass et al. Jul 2006 B2
7094537 Leproust et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097974 Staehler et al. Aug 2006 B1
7101508 Thompson et al. Sep 2006 B2
7101986 Dellinger et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105295 Bass et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115423 Mitchell Oct 2006 B1
7122303 Delenstarr et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122364 Lyamichev et al. Oct 2006 B1
7125488 Li Oct 2006 B2
7125523 Sillman Oct 2006 B2
7128876 Yin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129075 Gerard et al. Oct 2006 B2
7135565 Dellinger et al. Nov 2006 B2
7138062 Yin et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141368 Fisher et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141807 Joyce et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147362 Caren et al. Dec 2006 B2
7150982 Allawi et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153689 Tolosko et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163660 Lehmann Jan 2007 B2
7166258 Bass et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179659 Stolowitz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183406 Belshaw et al. Feb 2007 B2
7192710 Gellibolian et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193077 Dellinger et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198939 Dorsel et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202264 Ravikumar et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202358 Hargreaves Apr 2007 B2
7205128 Ilsley et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205400 Webb Apr 2007 B2
7206439 Zhou et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208322 Stolowitz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7217522 Brenner May 2007 B2
7220573 Shea et al. May 2007 B2
7221785 Curry et al. May 2007 B2
7226862 Staehler et al. Jun 2007 B2
7227017 Mellor et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229497 Stott et al. Jun 2007 B2
7247337 Leproust et al. Jul 2007 B1
7247497 Dahm et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252938 Leproust et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269518 Corson Sep 2007 B2
7271258 Dellinger et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276336 Webb et al. Oct 2007 B1
7276378 Myerson Oct 2007 B2
7276599 Moore et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282183 Peck Oct 2007 B2
7282332 Caren et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282705 Brennen Oct 2007 B2
7291471 Sampson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302348 Ghosh et al. Nov 2007 B2
7306917 Prudent et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314599 Roitman et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323320 Oleinikov Jan 2008 B2
7344831 Wolber et al. Mar 2008 B2
7348144 Minor Mar 2008 B2
7351379 Schleifer Apr 2008 B2
7353116 Webb et al. Apr 2008 B2
7361906 Ghosh et al. Apr 2008 B2
7364896 Schembri Apr 2008 B2
7368550 Dellinger et al. May 2008 B2
7371348 Schleifer et al. May 2008 B2
7371519 Wolber et al. May 2008 B2
7371580 Yakhini et al. May 2008 B2
7372982 Le May 2008 B2
7384746 Lyamichev et al. Jun 2008 B2
7385050 Dellinger et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390457 Schembri Jun 2008 B2
7393665 Brenner Jul 2008 B2
7396676 Robotti et al. Jul 2008 B2
7399844 Sampson et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402279 Schembri Jul 2008 B2
7411061 Myerson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7413709 Roitman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7417139 Dellinger et al. Aug 2008 B2
7422911 Schembri Sep 2008 B2
7427679 Dellinger et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432048 Neri et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435810 Myerson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7439272 Xu Oct 2008 B2
7476709 Moody et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482118 Allawi et al. Jan 2009 B2
7488607 Tom-Moy et al. Feb 2009 B2
7504213 Sana et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514369 Li et al. Apr 2009 B2
7517979 Wolber Apr 2009 B2
7524942 Wang et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524950 Dellinger et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527928 Neri et al. May 2009 B2
7531303 Dorsel et al. May 2009 B2
7534561 Sana et al. May 2009 B2
7534563 Hargreaves May 2009 B2
7537936 Dahm et al. May 2009 B2
7541145 Prudent et al. Jun 2009 B2
7544473 Brenner Jun 2009 B2
7556919 Chenchik et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563600 Oleinikov Jul 2009 B2
7572585 Wang Aug 2009 B2
7572907 Dellinger et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572908 Dellinger et al. Aug 2009 B2
7585970 Dellinger et al. Sep 2009 B2
7588889 Wolber et al. Sep 2009 B2
7595350 Xu Sep 2009 B2
7604941 Jacobson Oct 2009 B2
7604996 Stuelpnagel et al. Oct 2009 B1
7608396 Delenstarr Oct 2009 B2
7618777 Myerson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7629120 Bennett et al. Dec 2009 B2
7635772 McCormac Dec 2009 B2
7648832 Jessee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651762 Xu et al. Jan 2010 B2
7659069 Belyaev et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678542 Lyamichev et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682809 Sampson Mar 2010 B2
7709197 Drmanac May 2010 B2
7718365 Wang May 2010 B2
7718786 Dupret et al. May 2010 B2
7723077 Young et al. May 2010 B2
7737088 Staehler et al. Jun 2010 B1
7737089 Guimil et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741463 Gormley et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749701 Leproust et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759471 Dellinger et al. Jul 2010 B2
7776021 Borenstein et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776532 Gibson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7790369 Stahler et al. Sep 2010 B2
7790387 Dellinger et al. Sep 2010 B2
7807356 Sampson et al. Oct 2010 B2
7807806 Allawi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7811753 Eshoo Oct 2010 B2
7816079 Fischer Oct 2010 B2
7820387 Neri et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829314 Prudent et al. Nov 2010 B2
7855281 Dellinger et al. Dec 2010 B2
7862999 Zheng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867782 Barth Jan 2011 B2
7875463 Adaskin et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879541 Kincaid Feb 2011 B2
7879580 Carr et al. Feb 2011 B2
7894998 Kincaid Feb 2011 B2
7919239 Wang Apr 2011 B2
7919308 Schleifer Apr 2011 B2
7927797 Nobile et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927838 Shannon Apr 2011 B2
7932025 Carr et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932070 Hogrefe et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935800 Allawi et al. May 2011 B2
7939645 Borns May 2011 B2
7943046 Martosella et al. May 2011 B2
7943358 Hogrefe et al. May 2011 B2
7960157 Borns Jun 2011 B2
7977119 Kronick et al. Jul 2011 B2
7979215 Sampas Jul 2011 B2
7998437 Berndt et al. Aug 2011 B2
7999087 Dellinger et al. Aug 2011 B2
8021842 Brenner Sep 2011 B2
8021844 Wang Sep 2011 B2
8034917 Yamada Oct 2011 B2
8036835 Sampas et al. Oct 2011 B2
8048664 Guan et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053191 Blake Nov 2011 B2
8058001 Crameri et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058004 Oleinikov Nov 2011 B2
8058055 Barrett et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063184 Allawi et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067556 Hogrefe et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073626 Troup et al. Dec 2011 B2
8076064 Wang Dec 2011 B2
8076152 Robotti Dec 2011 B2
8097711 Timar et al. Jan 2012 B2
8137936 Macevicz Mar 2012 B2
8148068 Brenner Apr 2012 B2
8154729 Baldo et al. Apr 2012 B2
8168385 Brenner May 2012 B2
8168388 Gormley et al. May 2012 B2
8173368 Staehler et al. May 2012 B2
8182991 Kaiser et al. May 2012 B1
8194244 Wang et al. Jun 2012 B2
8198071 Goshoo et al. Jun 2012 B2
8202983 Dellinger et al. Jun 2012 B2
8202985 Dellinger et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206952 Carr et al. Jun 2012 B2
8213015 Kraiczek et al. Jul 2012 B2
8242258 Dellinger et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247221 Fawcett Aug 2012 B2
8263335 Carr et al. Sep 2012 B2
8268605 Sorge et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283148 Sorge et al. Oct 2012 B2
8288093 Hall et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298767 Brenner et al. Oct 2012 B2
8304273 Stellacci et al. Nov 2012 B2
8309307 Barrett et al. Nov 2012 B2
8309706 Dellinger et al. Nov 2012 B2
8309710 Sierzchala et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314220 Mullinax et al. Nov 2012 B2
8318433 Brenner Nov 2012 B2
8318479 Domansky et al. Nov 2012 B2
8357489 Chua et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357490 Froehlich et al. Jan 2013 B2
8367016 Quan et al. Feb 2013 B2
8367335 Staehler et al. Feb 2013 B2
8380441 Webb et al. Feb 2013 B2
8383338 Kitzman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8415138 Leproust Apr 2013 B2
8435736 Gibson et al. May 2013 B2
8445205 Brenner May 2013 B2
8445206 Bergmann et al. May 2013 B2
8470996 Brenner Jun 2013 B2
8476018 Brenner Jul 2013 B2
8476598 Pralle et al. Jul 2013 B1
8481292 Casbon et al. Jul 2013 B2
8481309 Zhang et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491561 Borenstein et al. Jul 2013 B2
8497069 Hutchison, III et al. Jul 2013 B2
8500979 Elibol et al. Aug 2013 B2
8501454 Liu et al. Aug 2013 B2
8507226 Carr et al. Aug 2013 B2
8507239 Lubys et al. Aug 2013 B2
8507272 Zhang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8530197 Li et al. Sep 2013 B2
8552174 Dellinger et al. Oct 2013 B2
8563478 Gormley et al. Oct 2013 B2
8569046 Love et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577621 Troup et al. Nov 2013 B2
8586310 Mitra et al. Nov 2013 B2
8614092 Zhang et al. Dec 2013 B2
8642755 Sierzchala et al. Feb 2014 B2
8664164 Ericsson et al. Mar 2014 B2
8669053 Stuelpnagel et al. Mar 2014 B2
8679756 Brenner et al. Mar 2014 B1
8685642 Sampas Apr 2014 B2
8685676 Hogrefe et al. Apr 2014 B2
8685678 Casbon et al. Apr 2014 B2
8715933 Oliver May 2014 B2
8715967 Casbon et al. May 2014 B2
8716467 Jacobson May 2014 B2
8722368 Casbon et al. May 2014 B2
8722585 Wang May 2014 B2
8728766 Casbon et al. May 2014 B2
8741606 Casbon et al. Jun 2014 B2
8808896 Choo et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808986 Jacobson et al. Aug 2014 B2
8815600 Liu et al. Aug 2014 B2
8889851 Leproust et al. Nov 2014 B2
8932994 Gormley et al. Jan 2015 B2
8962532 Shapiro et al. Feb 2015 B2
8968999 Gibson et al. Mar 2015 B2
8980563 Zheng et al. Mar 2015 B2
9018365 Brenner Apr 2015 B2
9023601 Oleinikov May 2015 B2
9051666 Oleinikov Jun 2015 B2
9073962 Fracchia et al. Jul 2015 B2
9074204 Anderson et al. Jul 2015 B2
9085797 Gebeyehu et al. Jul 2015 B2
9133510 Andersen et al. Sep 2015 B2
9139874 Myers et al. Sep 2015 B2
9150853 Hudson et al. Oct 2015 B2
9187777 Jacobson et al. Nov 2015 B2
9194001 Brenner Nov 2015 B2
9216414 Chu Dec 2015 B2
9217144 Jacobson et al. Dec 2015 B2
9279149 Efcavitch et al. Mar 2016 B2
9286439 Shapiro et al. Mar 2016 B2
9295965 Jacobson et al. Mar 2016 B2
9315861 Hendricks et al. Apr 2016 B2
9328378 Earnshaw et al. May 2016 B2
9347091 Bergmann et al. May 2016 B2
9375748 Harumoto et al. Jun 2016 B2
9376677 Mir Jun 2016 B2
9376678 Gormley et al. Jun 2016 B2
9384320 Church Jul 2016 B2
9384920 Bakulich Jul 2016 B1
9388407 Jacobson Jul 2016 B2
9394333 Wada et al. Jul 2016 B2
9403141 William Aug 2016 B2
9409139 Banyai et al. Aug 2016 B2
9410149 Brenner et al. Aug 2016 B2
9410173 Betts et al. Aug 2016 B2
9416411 Stuelpnagel et al. Aug 2016 B2
9422600 Ramu et al. Aug 2016 B2
9487824 Kutyavin et al. Nov 2016 B2
9499848 Carr et al. Nov 2016 B2
9523122 Zheng et al. Dec 2016 B2
9528148 Zheng et al. Dec 2016 B2
9534251 Young et al. Jan 2017 B2
9555388 Banyai et al. Jan 2017 B2
9568839 Stahler et al. Feb 2017 B2
9580746 Leproust et al. Feb 2017 B2
9670529 Osborne et al. Jun 2017 B2
9670536 Casbon et al. Jun 2017 B2
9677067 Toro Jun 2017 B2
9695211 Wada et al. Jul 2017 B2
9718060 Venter et al. Aug 2017 B2
9745573 Stuelpnagel et al. Aug 2017 B2
9745619 Rabbani et al. Aug 2017 B2
9765387 Rabbani et al. Sep 2017 B2
9771576 Gibson et al. Sep 2017 B2
9833761 Banyai Dec 2017 B2
9834774 Carstens Dec 2017 B2
9839894 Banyai Dec 2017 B2
9879283 Ravinder et al. Jan 2018 B2
9889423 Banyai Feb 2018 B2
9895673 Peck Feb 2018 B2
9925510 Jacobson et al. Mar 2018 B2
9932576 Raymond et al. Apr 2018 B2
9981239 Banyai May 2018 B2
10053688 Cox Aug 2018 B2
10583415 Banyai et al. Mar 2020 B2
10754994 Peck Aug 2020 B2
10773232 Banyai et al. Sep 2020 B2
20010018512 Blanchard Aug 2001 A1
20010039014 Bass et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010055761 Kanemoto et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020012930 Rothberg et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020025561 Hodgson Feb 2002 A1
20020076716 Sabanayagam et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081582 Gao et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020094533 Hess et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095073 Jacobs et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020119459 Griffiths et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020132308 Liu et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020155439 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020160536 Regnier et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020164824 Xiao et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030008411 Van et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022207 Balasubramanian et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022240 Luo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022317 Jack et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030044781 Korlach et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030058629 Hirai et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030064398 Barnes Apr 2003 A1
20030068633 Belshaw et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082719 Schumacher et al. May 2003 A1
20030100102 Rothberg et al. May 2003 A1
20030108903 Wang et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120035 Gao et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030138782 Evans Jul 2003 A1
20030143605 Lok et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030148291 Robotti Aug 2003 A1
20030148344 Rothberg et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171325 Gascoyne et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030186226 Brennan et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030228602 Parker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030228620 Du Dec 2003 A1
20040009498 Short Jan 2004 A1
20040043509 Stahler et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040053362 De et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040086892 Crothers et al. May 2004 A1
20040087008 Schembri May 2004 A1
20040106130 Besemer et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040106728 McGall et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040110133 Xu et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040175710 Haushalter Sep 2004 A1
20040175734 Stahler et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191810 Yamamoto Sep 2004 A1
20040213795 Collins et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219663 Page et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236027 Maeji et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040248161 Rothberg et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259146 Friend et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050022895 Barth et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049796 Webb et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050053968 Bharadwaj et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079510 Berka et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050100932 Lapidus et al. May 2005 A1
20050112608 Grossman et al. May 2005 A1
20050112636 Hurt et al. May 2005 A1
20050112679 Myerson et al. May 2005 A1
20050124022 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137805 Lewin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050208513 Agbo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050227235 Carr et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050255477 Carr et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266045 Canham et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277125 Benn et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282158 Landegren Dec 2005 A1
20060003381 Gilmore et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060003958 Melville et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012784 Ulmer Jan 2006 A1
20060012793 Harris Jan 2006 A1
20060019084 Pearson Jan 2006 A1
20060024678 Buzby Feb 2006 A1
20060024711 Lapidus et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024721 Pedersen Feb 2006 A1
20060076482 Hobbs et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078909 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078927 Peck et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078937 Korlach et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060127920 Church et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060134638 Mulligan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060160138 Church Jul 2006 A1
20060171855 Yin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060202330 Reinhardt et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203236 Ji et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203237 Ji et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060207923 Li Sep 2006 A1
20060219637 Killeen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070031857 Makarov et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031877 Stahler et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043516 Gustafsson et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070054127 Hergenrother et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070059692 Gao et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087349 Staehler et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070099208 Drmanac et al. May 2007 A1
20070122817 Church et al. May 2007 A1
20070141557 Raab et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070196854 Stahler et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207482 Church et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070207487 Emig et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070231800 Roberts et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238104 Barrett et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238106 Barrett et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238108 Barrett et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070259344 Leproust et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259345 Sampas Nov 2007 A1
20070259346 Gordon et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259347 Gordon et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070269870 Church et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080085511 Peck et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080085514 Peck et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080087545 Jensen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080161200 Yu et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080182296 Chanda et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080214412 Stahler et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080227160 Kool Sep 2008 A1
20080233616 Liss Sep 2008 A1
20080287320 Baynes et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300842 Govindarajan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080308884 Kalvesten Dec 2008 A1
20080311628 Shoemaker Dec 2008 A1
20090036664 Peter Feb 2009 A1
20090053704 Novoradovskaya et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062129 McKernan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090087840 Baynes et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090088679 Wood et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105094 Heiner et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090170802 Stahler et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090176280 Hutchison, III et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181861 Li et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194483 Robotti et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090230044 Bek Sep 2009 A1
20090238722 Mora-Fillat et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090239759 Balch Sep 2009 A1
20090246788 Albert et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090263802 Drmanac Oct 2009 A1
20090285825 Kini et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090324546 Notka et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004143 Shibahara Jan 2010 A1
20100009872 Eid et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100047805 Wang Feb 2010 A1
20100051967 Bradley et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069250 White, III et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100090341 Wan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100099103 Hsieh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100160463 Wang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100167950 Juang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100173364 Evans, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100216648 Staehler et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100256017 Larman et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100258487 Zelechonok et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100286290 Lohmann et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292102 Nouri Nov 2010 A1
20100300882 Zhang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009607 Komiyama et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110082055 Fox et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110114244 Yoo et al. May 2011 A1
20110114549 Yin et al. May 2011 A1
20110124049 Li et al. May 2011 A1
20110124055 Carr et al. May 2011 A1
20110126929 Velasquez-Garcia et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110171651 Richmond Jul 2011 A1
20110172127 Jacobson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110201057 Carr et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110217738 Jacobson Sep 2011 A1
20110230653 Novoradovskaya et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110254107 Bulovic et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110287435 Grunenwald et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120003713 Hansen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120021932 Mershin et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027786 Gupta et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120028843 Ramu et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120032366 Ivniski et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120046175 Rodesch et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120050411 Mabritto et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120094847 Warthmann et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120128548 West et al. May 2012 A1
20120129704 Gunderson et al. May 2012 A1
20120149602 Friend et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164127 Short et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164633 Laffler Jun 2012 A1
20120164691 Eshoo et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120184724 Sierzchala et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120220497 Jacobson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120231968 Bruhn et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238737 Dellinger et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120258487 Chang et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120264653 Carr et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270750 Oleinikov Oct 2012 A1
20120270754 Blake Oct 2012 A1
20120283140 Chu Nov 2012 A1
20120288476 Hartmann et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120289691 Dellinger et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120315670 Jacobson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120322681 Kung et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130005585 Anderson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130005612 Carr et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130017642 Milgrew et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130017977 Oleinikov Jan 2013 A1
20130017978 Kavanagh et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130035261 Sierzchala et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130040836 Himmler et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130045483 Treusch et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130053252 Xie et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130059296 Jacobson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130059761 Jacobson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130065017 Sieber Mar 2013 A1
20130109595 Routenberg May 2013 A1
20130109596 Peterson et al. May 2013 A1
20130123129 Zeiner et al. May 2013 A1
20130130321 Staehler et al. May 2013 A1
20130137161 Zhang et al. May 2013 A1
20130137173 Zhang et al. May 2013 A1
20130137174 Zhang et al. May 2013 A1
20130137861 Leproust et al. May 2013 A1
20130164308 Foletti et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130196864 Govindarajan et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130225421 Li et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130244884 Jacobson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130252849 Hudson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261027 Li et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130281308 Kung et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130296192 Jacobson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296194 Jacobson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130298265 Cunnac et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130309725 Jacobson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130323725 Peter et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130330778 Zeiner et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140011226 Bernick et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018441 Fracchia et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140031240 Behlke et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140038240 Temme et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140106394 Ko et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140141982 Jacobson et al. May 2014 A1
20140170665 Hiddessen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140178992 Nakashima et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140221250 Vasquez et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140274729 Kurn et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140274741 Hunter et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140303000 Armour et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140309119 Jacobson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140309142 Tian Oct 2014 A1
20150010953 Lindstrom et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150012723 Park et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150031089 Lindstrom Jan 2015 A1
20150038373 Banyai et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150056609 Daum et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057625 Coulthard Feb 2015 A1
20150065357 Fox Mar 2015 A1
20150065393 Jacobson Mar 2015 A1
20150099870 Bennett et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120265 Amirav-Drory Apr 2015 A1
20150159152 Allen et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150183853 Sharma et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150191524 Smith et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150191719 Hudson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150196917 Kay et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150203839 Jacobson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150211047 Borns Jul 2015 A1
20150225782 Walder et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150240232 Zamore et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150240280 Gibson et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150261664 Goldman et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150269313 Church Sep 2015 A1
20150293102 Shim Oct 2015 A1
20150307875 Happe et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150321191 Kendall et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150322504 Lao et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150344927 Sampson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150353921 Tian Dec 2015 A9
20150353994 Myers et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150361420 Hudson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150361422 Sampson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150361423 Sampson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150368687 Saaem et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150376602 Jacobson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160001247 Oleinikov Jan 2016 A1
20160002621 Nelson et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160002622 Nelson et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160010045 Cohen et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160017394 Liang et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160017425 Ruvolo et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160019341 Harris et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160024138 Gebeyehu et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160024576 Chee et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160026753 Krishnaswami et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160026758 Jabara et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160032396 Diehn et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160046973 Efcavitch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160046974 Efcavitch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160082472 Perego et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160089651 Banyai Mar 2016 A1
20160090592 Banyai et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160096160 Banyai et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160097051 Jacobson et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160102322 Ravinder et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160108466 Nazarenko et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160122755 Hall et al. May 2016 A1
20160122800 Bernick et al. May 2016 A1
20160152972 Stapleton et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160168611 Efcavitch et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184788 Hall et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160200759 Srivastava et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160215283 Braman et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160229884 Indermuhle Aug 2016 A1
20160230175 Carstens Aug 2016 A1
20160230221 Bergmann et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160251651 Banyai et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160256846 Smith et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160264958 Toro et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160289758 Akeson et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160289839 Harumoto et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160303535 Banyai et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160304862 Igawa et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160304946 Betts et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160310426 Wu Oct 2016 A1
20160310927 Banyai et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160318016 Hou et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160333340 Wu Nov 2016 A1
20160339409 Banyai Nov 2016 A1
20160340672 Banyai et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160348098 Stuelpnagel et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160354752 Banyai et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160355880 Gormley et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170017436 Church Jan 2017 A1
20170066844 Glanville Mar 2017 A1
20170067099 Zheng et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170073664 McCafferty et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170073731 Zheng et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170081660 Cox Mar 2017 A1
20170081716 Peck Mar 2017 A1
20170088887 Makarov et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170095785 Banyai Apr 2017 A1
20170096706 Behlke et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170114404 Behlke et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170141793 Strauss et al. May 2017 A1
20170147748 Staehler et al. May 2017 A1
20170151546 Peck et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170159044 Toro et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170175110 Jacobson et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170218537 Olivares Aug 2017 A1
20170233764 Young et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170247473 Short Aug 2017 A1
20170249345 Malik et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170253644 Steyaert et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170320061 Venter et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170327819 Banyai Nov 2017 A1
20170355984 Evans et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170357752 Diggans Dec 2017 A1
20170362589 Banyai Dec 2017 A1
20180029001 Banyai Feb 2018 A1
20180051278 Cox et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180051280 Gibson et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180068060 Ceze et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180101487 Peck Apr 2018 A1
20180104664 Fernandez Apr 2018 A1
20180126355 Peck May 2018 A1
20180142289 Zeitoun May 2018 A1
20180171509 Cox Jun 2018 A1
20180236425 Banyai et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180253563 Peck Sep 2018 A1
20180264428 Banyai et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180326388 Banyai et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180346585 Zhang et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180355351 Nugent et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190060345 Harrison et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190118154 Marsh et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190135926 Glanville May 2019 A1
20190240636 Peck et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190244109 Bramlett et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190352635 Toro et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190366293 Banyai et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200017907 Zeitoun et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200102611 Zeitoun et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200156037 Banyai et al. May 2020 A1
20200181667 Wu et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200222875 Peck et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200283760 Nugent et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200299322 Indermuhle et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200299684 Toro et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200308575 Sato Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (197)
Number Date Country
3157000 Sep 2000 AU
2362939 Aug 2000 CA
2792676 Sep 2011 CA
1771336 May 2006 CN
102159726 Aug 2011 CN
103907117 Jul 2014 CN
104520864 Apr 2015 CN
104562213 Apr 2015 CN
104734848 Jun 2015 CN
10260805 Jul 2004 DE
0090789 Oct 1983 EP
0126621 Aug 1990 EP
0753057 Jan 1997 EP
1314783 May 2003 EP
1363125 Nov 2003 EP
1546387 Jun 2005 EP
1153127 Jul 2006 EP
1728860 Dec 2006 EP
1072010 Apr 2010 EP
2175021 Apr 2010 EP
2330216 Jun 2011 EP
1343802 May 2012 EP
2504449 Oct 2012 EP
2751729 Jul 2014 EP
2872629 May 2015 EP
2928500 Oct 2015 EP
2971034 Jan 2016 EP
3030682 Jun 2016 EP
3044228 Apr 2017 EP
2994509 Jun 2017 EP
3204518 Aug 2017 EP
2002536977 Nov 2002 JP
2002538790 Nov 2002 JP
2006503586 Feb 2006 JP
2008523786 Jul 2008 JP
2008218579 Sep 2008 JP
2009294195 Dec 2009 JP
2016527313 Sep 2016 JP
WO-9015070 Dec 1990 WO
WO-9210092 Jun 1992 WO
WO-9210588 Jun 1992 WO
WO-9309668 May 1993 WO
WO-9525116 Sep 1995 WO
WO-9526397 Oct 1995 WO
WO-9615861 May 1996 WO
WO-9710365 Mar 1997 WO
WO-9822541 May 1998 WO
WO-9841531 Sep 1998 WO
WO-9942813 Aug 1999 WO
WO-0013017 Mar 2000 WO
WO-0018957 Apr 2000 WO
WO-0042559 Jul 2000 WO
WO-0042560 Jul 2000 WO
WO-0042561 Jul 2000 WO
WO-0049142 Aug 2000 WO
WO-0053617 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0156216 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0210443 Feb 2002 WO
WO-0156216 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0220537 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0224597 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0227638 Apr 2002 WO
WO-0233669 Apr 2002 WO
WO-02072791 Sep 2002 WO
WO-03040410 May 2003 WO
WO-03046223 Jun 2003 WO
WO-03054232 Jul 2003 WO
WO-03064026 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03064027 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03064699 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03065038 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03066212 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03089605 Oct 2003 WO
WO-03093504 Nov 2003 WO
WO-03100012 Dec 2003 WO
WO-2004024886 Mar 2004 WO
WO-2004029220 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004029586 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004031351 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004031399 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004059556 Jul 2004 WO
WO-2005014850 Feb 2005 WO
WO-2005051970 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2005059096 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2005059097 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2006023144 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006044956 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006076679 Jul 2006 WO
WO-2006116476 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007109221 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007120627 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2007137242 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2008003116 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008006078 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008027558 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2008045380 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008054543 May 2008 WO
WO-2008063134 May 2008 WO
WO-2008063135 May 2008 WO
WO-2008109176 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2010025310 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010025566 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010027512 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010089412 Aug 2010 WO
WO-2010141433 Dec 2010 WO
WO-2010141433 Apr 2011 WO
WO-2011053957 May 2011 WO
WO-2011056644 May 2011 WO
WO-2011056872 May 2011 WO
WO-2011066185 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011066186 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011085075 Jul 2011 WO
WO-2011103468 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011109031 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2011143556 Nov 2011 WO
WO-2011150168 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2011161413 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2012013913 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012061832 May 2012 WO
WO-2012078312 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2012149171 Nov 2012 WO
WO-2012154201 Nov 2012 WO
WO-2013030827 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013032850 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013036668 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013101896 Jul 2013 WO
WO-2013154770 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2013177220 Nov 2013 WO
WO-2014004393 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014008447 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014035693 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014088693 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014089160 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014093330 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014093694 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014151117 Sep 2014 WO
WO-2014151696 Sep 2014 WO
WO-2014160004 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2014160059 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2014206304 Dec 2014 WO
WO-2015017527 Feb 2015 WO
WO-2015021080 Feb 2015 WO
WO-2015021280 Feb 2015 WO
WO-2015031689 Mar 2015 WO
WO-2015040075 Mar 2015 WO
WO-2015054292 Apr 2015 WO
WO-2015066174 May 2015 WO
WO-2015081114 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015081142 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015090879 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015095404 Jun 2015 WO
WO-2015120403 Aug 2015 WO
WO-2015136072 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015160004 Oct 2015 WO
WO-2015175832 Nov 2015 WO
WO-2016007604 Jan 2016 WO
WO-2016011080 Jan 2016 WO
WO-2016022557 Feb 2016 WO
WO-2016053883 Apr 2016 WO
WO-2016055956 Apr 2016 WO
WO-2016065056 Apr 2016 WO
WO-2016126882 Aug 2016 WO
WO-2016126987 Aug 2016 WO
WO-2016130868 Aug 2016 WO
WO-2016161244 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016162127 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016172377 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016173719 Nov 2016 WO
WO-2016183100 Nov 2016 WO
WO-2017017423 Feb 2017 WO
WO-2017049231 Mar 2017 WO
WO-2017053450 Mar 2017 WO
WO-2017059399 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2017095958 Jun 2017 WO
WO-2017100441 Jun 2017 WO
WO-2017118761 Jul 2017 WO
WO-2017158103 Sep 2017 WO
WO-2017214574 Dec 2017 WO
WO-2018026920 Feb 2018 WO
WO-2018038772 Mar 2018 WO
WO-2018057526 Mar 2018 WO
WO-2018094263 May 2018 WO
WO-2018112426 Jun 2018 WO
WO-2018156792 Aug 2018 WO
WO-2018170164 Sep 2018 WO
WO-2018170169 Sep 2018 WO
WO-2018200380 Nov 2018 WO
WO-2018231872 Dec 2018 WO
WO-2019051501 Mar 2019 WO
WO-2019079769 Apr 2019 WO
WO-2019084500 May 2019 WO
WO-2019136175 Jul 2019 WO
WO-2019222706 Nov 2019 WO
WO-2020139871 Jul 2020 WO
WO-2020176362 Sep 2020 WO
WO-2020176678 Sep 2020 WO
WO-2020176680 Sep 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (541)
Entry
Assembly manual for the POSaM: THE ISB Piezoelelctric Oligonucleotide Synthesizer and Microarrayer, The Institute for Systems Biology, May 28, 2004 (50 pages).
European Patent Application No. 14834665.3 Further Examination Report dated Nov. 28, 2018.
European Patent Application No. 16847497.1 Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 9, 2019.
European Patent Application No. 16871446.7 European Search Report dated Apr. 10, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2017/026232 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 26, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2017/045105 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 5, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2017/052305 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 30, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2017/062391 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 21, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2018/050511 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 11, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2018/057857 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2019/012218 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 21, 2019.
Light source unit for printable patterning VUV-Aligner / USHIO Inc., Link here: https://www.ushio.co.jp/en/products/1005.html, published Apr. 25, 2016, printed from the internet on Aug. 2, 2016, 3 pages.
Mazor et al.: Isolation of Full-Length IgG Antibodies from Combinatorial Libraries Expressed in Escherichia coli; Antony S. Dimitrov (ed.), Therapeutic Antibodies: Methods and Protocols, vol. 525, Chapter 11, pp. 217-239 (2009).
Jo et al.: Engineering therapeutic antibodies targeting G-protein-coupled receptors; Experimental & Molecular Medicine; 48; 9 pages (2016).
Lausted et al.: POSaM: a fast, flexible, open-source, inkjet oligonucleotide synthesizer and microarrayer; Genome Biology 2004, 5:R58.
Douthwaiteet al.: Affinity maturation of a novel antagonistic human monoclonal antibody with a long VH CDR3 targeting the Class A GPCR formyl-peptide receptor 1; mAbs, vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 152-166 (Jan. 1, 2015).
PCT/US2018/037161 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 22, 2018.
PCT/US2018/056783 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 20, 2018.
Martinez-Torrecuadradaet al.: Targeting the Extracellular Domain of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 with Human Single-Chain Fv Antibodies Inhibits Bladder Carcinoma Cell Line Proliferation; Clinical Cancer Research; vol. 11; pp. 6282-6290 (2005).
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,714 Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/603,013 Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,963 Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,059 Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/156,134 Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,714 Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 17, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,422 Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,422 Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 4, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/377,547 Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,909 Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,909 Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 17, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,991 Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,991 Office Action dated May 31, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/709,274 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 3, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/729,564 Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/729,564 Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/729,564 Office Action dated May 30, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,995 Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 4, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/844,395 Restriction Requirement dated May 17, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/860,445 Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,479 Restriction Requirement dated May 24, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/151,316Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2019.
Wu, et al. “Sequence-Specific Capture of Protein-DNA Complexes for Mass Spectrometric Protein Identification” PLoS ONE. Oct. 20, 2011, vol. 6, No. 10.
Zhou, et al. “Establishment and application of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) system for detection of cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane” Scientific Reports May 9, 2014, vol. 4, No. 4912.
Abudayyeh et al., C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science, available on line, Jun. 13, 2016, at: http://zlab.mit.edu/assets/reprints/Abudayyeh_OO_Science_2016.pdf , 17 pages.
Acevedo-Rocha et al. Directed evolution of stereoselective enzymes based on genetic selection as opposed to screening systems. J. Biotechnol. 191:3-10 (2014).
Adessi, et al. Solid phase DNA amplification: characterisation of primer attachment and amplification mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(20):E87, 2000.
Alexeyev, Mikhail F. et al., Gene synthesis, bacterial expression and purification of the Rickettsia prowazekii ATP/ADP translocase, Biochimica et Biophysics Acta, 1419:299-306, 1999.
Al-Housseiny et al., Control of interfacial instabilities using flow geometry Nature Physics, 8:747-750, 2012.
Amblard, Francois et al., A magnetic manipulator for studying local rheology and micromechanical properties of biological systems, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 67(3):18-827, 1996.
Andoni and Indyk, Near-Optimal Hashing Algorithms for Approximate Nearest Neighbor in High Dimensions, Communications of the ACM, 51(1):117-122, 2008.
Arand et al. Structure of Rhodococcus erythropolis limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase reveals a novel active site. EMBO J. 22:2583-2592 (2003).
Arkles, et al. The Role of Polarity in the Structure of Silanes Employed in Surface Modification. Silanes and Other Coupling Agents. 5:51-64, 2009.
Arkles, Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity Reprinted with permission from the Oct. 2006 issue of Paint & Coatings Industry magazine, Retrieved on Mar. 19, 2016, 10 pages.
Assi, Fabiano et al., Massive-parallel adhesion and reactivity—measurements using simple and inexpensive magnetic tweezers, J. Appl. Phys., 92(9):5584-5586, 2002.
ATDBio, Nucleic Acid Structure, Nucleic Acids Book, 9 pages, published on Jan. 22, 2005. from: http://www.atdbio.com/content/5/Nucleic-acid-structure.
ATDBio, Solid-Phase Oligonucleotide Synthesis, Nucleic Acids Book, 20 pages, Published on Jul. 31, 2011. from: http://www.atdbio.com/content/17/Solid-phase-oligonucleotide-synthesis.
Au, Lo-Chun et al. Gene synthesis by a LCR-based approach: high level production of Leptin-L54 using synthetic gene in Escherichia coli, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 248:200-203, 1998.
Baedeker, Mathias et al., Overexpression of a designed 2.2kb gene of eukaryotic phenylalanine ammonialyase in Escherichia coli. FEBS Letters, 457:57-60, 1999.
Barbee, et al. Magnetic Assembly of High-Density DNA Arrays for Genomic Analyses. Anal Chem. 80(6):2149-2154, 2008.
Barton et al., A desk electrohydrodynamic jet printing system. Mechatronics, 20:611-616, 2010.
Beaucage, et al. Advances in the synthesis of oligonucleotides by the phosphoramidite approach. Tetrahedron. 48:2223-2311, 1992.
Beaucage, et al. Deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites—A new class of key intermediates for deoxypolynucleotide synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 22(20):1859-1862, 1981.
Beaucage, Serge L. et al., The Chemical synthesis of DNA/RNA Chapter 2 in: Encyclopedia of Cell Biology, 1:36-53, 2016.
Beaulieu, Martin et al., PCR candidate region mismatch scanning adaptation to quantitative, high-throughput genotyping, Nucleic Acids Research, 29(5):1114-1124, 2001.
Beigelman, et al. Base-modified phosphoramidite analogs of pyrimidine ribonucleosides for RNA structure-activity studies. Methods Enzymol. 317:39-65, 2000.
Bethge et al., Reverse synthesis and 3′-modification of RNA. Jan. 1, 2011, pp. 64-64, XP055353420. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.is3na.org/assets/events/Category%202-Medicinal %20Chemistry%20of%2001igonucleotides%20%2864-108%29.pdf.
Binkowski et al., Correcting errors in synthetic DNA through consensus shuffling. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(6):e55, 8 pages, 2005.
Biswas, Indranil et al., Identification and characterization of a thermostable MutS homolog from Thermus aquaticus, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271(9):5040-5048, 1996.
Biswas, Indranil et al., Interaction of MutS protein with the major and minor grooves of a heteroduplex DNA, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(20):13355-13364, 1997.
Bjornson, Keith P. et al., Differential and simultaneous adenosine Di- and Triphosphate binding by MutS, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(20):18557-18562, 2003.
Blanchard, et al. High-Density Oligonucleotide Arrays. Biosens. & Bioelectronics. 1996; 11:687-690.
Blanchard, in: Genetic Engineering, Principles and Methods, vol. 20, Ed. J. Sedlow, New York: Plenum Press, p. 111-124, 1979.
Blawat et al., Forward error correction for DNA data storage. Procedia Computer Science, 80:1011-1022, 2016.
Bonini and Mondino, Adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer: The era of engineered T cells. European Journal of Immunology, 45:2457-2469, 2015.
Bornholt et al., A DNA-Based Archival Storage System, in International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Apr. 2-6, 2016, Atlanta, GA, 2016, 637-649.
Borovkov et al., High-quality gene assembly directly from unpurified mixtures of microassay-synthesized oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Research, 38(19):e180, 10 pages, 2010.
Brunet, Aims and methods of biosteganography. Journal of Biotechnology, 226:56-64, 2016.
Buermans et al., Next Generation sequencing technology: Advances and applications, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Basis of Disease, 1842:1931-1941, 2014.
Butler, et al. In situ synthesis of oligonucleotide arrays by using surface tension. J Am Chem Soc. 123(37):8887-94, 2001.
Calvert. Lithographically patterned self-assembled films. In: Organic Thin Films and Surfaces: Directions for the Nineties, vol. 20, p. 109, ed. By Abraham Ulman, San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.
Cardelli, Two-Domain DNA Strand Displacement, Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci., 26:47-61, 2010.
Carlson, Time for New DNA Synthesis and Sequencing Cost Curves, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.synthesis.cc/synthesis/2014/02/time_for_new_cost_curves_2014. 10 pages.
Carr, et al. Protein-mediated error correction for de novo DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(20):e162, 9 pages, 2004.
Carter and Friedman, DNA synthesis and Biosecurity: Lessons learned and options for the future. J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, 28 pages, Oct. 2015.
Caruthers, Chemical synthesis of deoxyoligonucleotides by the phosphoramidite method. In Methods in Enzymology, Chapter 15, 154:287-313, 1987.
Caruthers. Gene synthesis machines: DNA chemistry and its uses. Science 230(4723):281-285 (1985).
Caruthers, The Chemical Synthesis of DNA/RNA: Our Gift to Science. J. Biol. Chem., 288(2):1420-1427, 2013.
Casmiro, Danilo R. et al., PCR-based gene synthesis and protein NMR spectroscopy, Structure, 5(11):1407-1412, 1997.
CeGaT. Tech Note available at https://www.cegat.de/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Twist-Exome-Tech-Note.pdf (4 pgs.) (2018).
Cello, et al. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science. 297(5583):1016-8, 2000.
Chalmers, et al. Scaling up the ligase chain reaction-based approach to gene synthesis. Biotechniques. 30(2):249-52, 2001.
Chan, et al. Natural and engineered nicking endonucleases—from cleavage mechanism to engineering of strand-specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(1):1-18, 2011.
Chen, et al. Chemical modification of gene silencing oligonucleotides for drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 10(8):587-93 2005.
Chen et al., Programmable chemical controllers made from DNA, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8(10):755-762, 2013.
Cheng, et al. High throughput parallel synthesis of oligonucleotides with 1536 channel synthesizer. Nucleic Acids Res. 30(18):e93, 2002.
Chilamakuri et al. Performance comparison of four exome capture systems for deep sequencing. BMC Genomics 15(1):449 (2014).
Cho, et al. Capillary passive valve in microfluidic systems. NSTI-Nanotech. 2004; 1:263-266.
Chrisey et al., Fabrication of patterned DNA surfaces Nucleic Acids Research, 24(15):3040-3047 (1996).
Chung et al., One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: Transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 1989;86(7):2172-2175.
Church et al., Next-generation digital information storage in DNA. Science, 337:6102, 1628-1629, 2012.
Cleary et al. Production of complex nucleic acid libraries using highly parallel in situ oligonucleotide synthesis. Nat Methods 1(3):241-248 (2004).
Cohen et al., Human population: The next half century. Science, 302:1172-1175, 2003.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,479, filed Mar. 14, 2018.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,537, filed Mar. 14, 2018.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/006,581, filed Jun. 12, 2018.
Crick. On protein synthesis. Symp Soc Exp Biol12:138-163,1958.
Cruse et al. Atlas of Immunology, Third Edition. Boca Raton:CRC Press (pp. 282-283) (2010).
Cutler, David J. et al., High-throughput variation detection and genotyping using microarrays, Genome Research, vol. 11, 1913-19 (2001).
Dahl, et al. Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 30, 2004;101(13):4548-53. Epub Mar. 15, 2004.
De Mesmaeker, et al. Backbone modifications in oligonucleotides and peptide nucleic acid systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Jun. 1995;5(3):343-55.
De Silva et al. New Trends of Digital Data Storage in DNA. BioMed Res Int. 2016:8072463 (2016).
Deamer, David W. et al., Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis, Ace. Cham. Res., vol. 35, No. 10, 817-825 (2002).
Deaven, The Human Genome Project: Recombinant clones for mapping and sequencing DNA. Los Alamos Science, 20:218-249, 1992.
Deng et al., Targeted bisulfite sequencing reveals changes in DNA methylation associated with nuclear reprogramming Nature Biotechnology, 27:352-360 (2009).
Dietrich, Rudiger.et al., Gene assembly based on blunt-ended double-stranded DNA-modules, Biotechnology Techniques, vol. 12, No. 1, 49-54 (Jan. 1998).
Dillon et al. Exome sequencing has higher diagnostic yield compared to simulated disease-specific panels in children with suspected monogenic disorders. Eur J Hum Genet 26(5):644-651 (2018).
Dormitzer et al., Synthetic generation of influenza vaccine viruses for rapid response to pandemics. Sci Translational Medicine, 5(185):185ra68, 14 pages, 2013.
Doudna et al. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346(6213):1258096-1-1258096-9, 2014.
Dower et al., High efficiency transformation of E.coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 16(13):6127-45 (1988).
Dressman, et al. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 22, 2003;100(15):8817-22. Epub Jul. 11, 2003.
Drmanac, et al. Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science. Jan. 1, 2010;327(5961):78-81. doi: 10.1126/science.1181498. Epub Nov. 5, 2009.
Droege and Hill, The Genome Sequencer FLXTM System-Longer reads, more applications, straight forward bioinformatics and more complete data sets Journal of Biotechnology, 136:3-10, 2008.
Duffy, et al. Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem. Dec. 1, 1998;70(23):4974-84. doi: 10.1021/ac980656z.
Duggan, et al. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. Jan. 1999;21(1 Suppl):10-4.
Dvorsky. Living Bacteria Can Now Store Data. GIZMODO internet publication. Retrieved from https://gizmodo.com/living-bacteria-can-now-store-data-1781773517 (4 pgs) (Jun. 10, 2016).
Eadie, et al. Guanine modification during chemical DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 26, 1987;15(20):8333-49.
Eisen, Jonathan A., A phylogenomic study of the MutS family of proteins, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 26, No. 18, 4291-4300 (1998).
Ellis, et al. DNA assembly for synthetic biology: from parts to pathways and beyond. Integr Biol (Camb). Feb. 2011;3(2):109-18. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00070a. Epub Jan. 19, 2011.
El-Sagheer, et al. Biocompatible artificial DNA linker that is read through by DNA polymerases and is functional in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 12, 2011;108(28):11338-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101519108. Epub Jun. 27, 2011.
Elsik et al., The Genome sequence of taurine cattle: A window of ruminant biology and evolution. Science, 324:522-528, 2009.
Elsner et al., 172 nm excimer VUV-triggered photodegradation and micropatterning of aminosilane films, Thin Solid Films, 517:6772-6776 (2009).
Engler, et al. A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647. Epub Nov. 5, 2008.
Engler, et al. Golden gate shuffling: a one-pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005553. Epub May 14, 2009.
Erlich and Zielinski, DNA fountain enables a robust and efficient storage architecture. Science, 355(6328):950-054, 2017.
European Patent Application No. 12827479.2 Extended European Search Report dated May 18, 2015.
European Patent Application No. 12827479.2 Partial European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2015.
European Patent Application No. 14834665.3 Communication dated Jan. 16, 2018.
European Patent Application No. 14834665.3 extended European Search Report dated Apr. 28, 2017.
European Patent Application No. 14834665.3 Office Action dated May 2, 2018.
Evans et al., DNA Repair Enzymes. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology 84:III:3.9:3.9.1-3.9.12 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972391 (Published online Oct. 1, 2008 Abstract only provided).
Fahy, et al. Self-sustained sequence replication (3SR): an isothermal transcription-based amplification system alternative to PCR. PCR Methods Appl. Aug. 1991;1(1):25-33.
Fedoryak, Olesya D. et al., Brominated hydroxyquinoline as a photolabile protecting group with sensitivity to multiphoton excitation, Org. Lett., vol. 4, No. 2 , 3419-3422 (2002).
Ferretti et al., Total synthesis of a gene for bovine rhodopsin. PNAS, 83:599-603 (1986).
Finger et al., The wonders of Flap Endonucleases: Structure, function, mechanism and regulation. Subcell Biochem., 62:301-326, 2012.
Fodor et al. Light-Directed, Spatially Addressable Parallel Chemical Synthesis. Science 251(4995):767-773 (1991).
Fogg et al., Structural basis for uracil recognition by archaeal family B DNA polymerases. Nature Structural Biology, 9(12):922-927, 2002.
Foldesi, et al. The synthesis of deuterionucleosides. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. Oct.-Dec. 2000;19(10-12):1615-56.
Frandsen, et al. Efficient four fragment cloning for the construction of vectors for targeted gene replacement in filamentous fungi. BMC Molecular Biology 2008, 9:70.
Frandsen. Experimental setup. Dec. 7, 2010, 3 pages. http://www.rasmusfrandsen.dk/experimental_setup.htm.
Frandsen. The User Friendly technology. User cloning. Oct. 7, 2010, 2 pages. http://www.rasmusfrandsen.dk/user_cloning.htm.
Fullwood et al., Next-generation DNA sequencing of paired-end tags [PET] for transcriptome and genome analysis Genome Research, 19:521-532, 2009.
Galneder. et al., Microelectrophoresis of a bilayer-coated silica bead in an optical trap: application to enzymology. Biophysical Journal, vol. 80, No. 5, 2298-2309 (May 2001).
Gao, et al. A flexible light-directed DNA chip synthesis gated by deprotection using solution photogenerated acids. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 2001;29(22):4744-50.
Gao et al. A method for the generation of combinatorial antibody libraries using pIX phage display. PNAS 99(20):12612-12616 (2002).
Gao, et al. Thermodynamically balanced inside-out (TBIO) PCR-based gene synthesis: a novel method of primer design for high-fidelity assembly of longer gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 2003;31(22):e143.
Garaj, et al. Graphene as a subnanometre trans-electrode membrane. Nature. Sep. 9, 2010;467(7312):190-3. doi: 10.1038/nature09379.
Garbow, Norbert et al., Optical tweezing electrophoresis of isolated, highly charged colloidal spheres, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochem. Eng. Aspects, vol. 195, 227-241 (2001).
GeneArt Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kits. Life Technologies Synthetic Biology. 8 pages, available online Jun. 15, 2012.
Genomics 101. An Introduction to the Genomic Workflow. 2016 edition, 64 pages. Available at: http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/magazine/6757/genomics-101/.
Geu-Flores, et al. USER fusion: a rapid and efficient method for simultaneous fusion and cloning of multiple PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(7):e55. Epub Mar. 27, 2007.
Gibson Assembly. Product Listing. Application Overview. 2 pages, available online Dec. 16, 2014.
Gibson, et al. Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science. Feb. 29, 2008;319(5867):1215-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1151721. Epub Jan. 24, 2008.
Gibson et al. Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome. Science 329(5989):52-56 (2010).
Goldfeder et al. Medical implications of technical accuracy in genome sequencing. Genome Med 8(1):24 (2016).
Goldman et al., Towards practical, high-capacity, low-maintenance information storage in synthesized DNA, Nature, 494(7435):77-80, 2013.
Gosse, Charlie et al. Magnetic tweezers: micromanipulation and force measurement at the molecular level, Biophysical Journal, vol. 8, 3314-3329 (Jun. 2002).
Grass, et al., Robust chemical preservation of digital information on DNA in silica with error-correcting codes, Angew. Chemie—Int. Ed., 54(8):2552-2555, 2015.
Greagg et al., A read-ahead function in archaeal DNA polymerases detects promutagenic template-strand uracil. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 96:9045-9050, 1999.
Grovenor. Microelectronic materials. Graduate Student Series in Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol, England: Adam Hilger, 1989; p. 113-123.
Gu et al., Depletion of abundant sequences by hybridization (DASH): using Cas9 to remove unwanted high-abundance species in sequencing libraries and molecular counting applications. Genome Biology, 17:41, 13 pages, 2016.
Haber, Charbel et al., Magnetic tweezers for DNA micromanipulation, Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 71, No. 12, 4561-4570 (Dec. 2000).
Han et al. Linking T-cell receptor sequence to functional phenotype at the single-cell level. Nat Biotechnol 32(7):684-692 (2014).
Hanahan and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-580 (1983).
Hanahan et al., Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol, vol. 204, p. 63-113 (1991).
Harada, et al. Unexpected substrate specificity of T4 DNA ligase revealed by in vitro selection. Nucleic Acids Res. May 25, 1993;21(10):2287-91.
Heckers Karl H. et al., Error analysis of chemically synthesized polynucleotides, BioTechniques, vol. 24, No. 2, 256-260 (1998).
Herzer et al.: Fabrication of patterned silane based self-assembled monolayers by photolithography and surface reactions on silicon-oxide substrates Chem. Commun., 46:5634-5652 (2010).
Hoover et al., DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, No. 10, e43, 7 pages (2002).
Hosu, Basarab G. et al., Magnetic tweezers for intracellular applications., Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 74, No. 9, 4158-4163 (Sep. 2003).
Huang, Hayden et al., Three-dimensional cellular deformation analysis with a two-photon magnetic manipulator workstation, Biophysical Journal, vol. 82, No. 4, 2211-2223 (Apr. 2002).
Hughes, et al. Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2001;19(4):342-7.
Hughes et al. Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 162(2):1239-1249, 2011.
Hutchison, et al. Cell-free cloning using phi29 DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 29, 2005;102(48):17332-6. Epub Nov. 14, 2005.
Imgur: The magic of the internet. Uploaded May 10, 2012, 2 pages, retrieved from: https://imgur.com/mEWuW.
In-Fusion Cloning: Accuracy, Not Background. Cloning & Competent Cells, ClonTech Laboratories, 3 pages, available online Jul. 6, 2014.
Jackson, Brian A. et al., Recognition of DNA base mismatches by a rhodium intercalator, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 19, 12986-12987 (1997).
Jacobs et al. DNA glycosylases: In DNA repair and beyond. Chromosoma 121:1-20 (2012)—http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260424/.
Jacobus et al. Optimal cloning of PCR fragments by homologous recombination in Escherichia soli. PLoS One 10(3):e0119221 (2015).
Jager et al. Simultaneous Humoral and Cellular: Immune Response against Cancer—Testis Antigen NY-ES0-1: Definition of Human Histocompatibility LeukocyteAntigen (HLA)-binding Peptide Epitopes. J. Exp. Med. 187(2):265-270 (1998).
Jinek et al., A Programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337:816-821, 2012.
Karagiannis and Ei-Osta, RNA interference and potential therapeutic applications of short interfering RNAs Cancer Gene Therapy, 12:787-795, 2005.
Ke, Song-Hua et al., Influence of neighboring base pairs on the stability of single base bulges and base pairs in a DNA fragment, Biochemistry, Vo. 34, 4593-4600 (1995).
Kelley, Shana, et al. Single-base mismatch detection based on charge transduction through DNA, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, No. 24, 4830-4837 (1999).
Kim et al., High-resolution patterns of quantum dots formed by electrohydrodynamic jet printing for light-emitting diodes. Nano Letters, 15:969-973, 2015.
Kim, Yang-Gyun et al., Chimeric restriction endonuclease, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 91, 883-887 (Feb. 1994).
Kim, Yang-Gyun, the interaction between Z-ONA and the Zab domain of double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase characterized using fusion nucleases, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, No. 27, 19081-19086 (1999).
Kim, Yan˜Gyun et al., Site specific cleavage of DNA-RNA hybrids by zinc finger/Fok I cleavage domain fusions Gene, vol. 203, 43-49 (1997).
Kinde, et al. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 7, 2011;108(23):9530-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105422108. Epub May 17, 2011.
Kodumal, et al. Total synthesis of long DNA sequences: synthesis of a contiguous 32-kb polyketide synthase gene cluster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 2, 2004;101(44):15573-8. Epub Oct. 20, 2004.
Koike-Yusa et al., Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nature Biotechnology, 32:267-273, 2014 (with three pages of supplemental Online Methods).
Kong et al., Parallel gene synthesis in a microfluidic device. Nucleic Acids Res., 35(8):e61 (2007).
Kong. Microfluidic Gene Synthesis. MIT Thesis. Submitted to the program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 143 pages Jun. 2008.
Kopp, Martin U. et al., Chemical amplification: continuous-flow PCR on a chip, Science, vol. 280, 1046-1048 (May 15, 1998).
Kosuri and Church, Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications, Nature Methods, 11:499-507, 2014. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v11/n5/full/nmeth.2918.html.
Kosuri, et al. A scalable gene synthesis by selective amplification of DNA pools from high-fidelity microchips. Nature Biotechnology. 2010; 28:1295-1299.
Krayden, Inc., A Guide to Silane Solutions. Silane coupling agents. 7 pages. Published on May 31, 2005 at: http://krayden.com/pdf/xia_silane_chemistry.pdf.
Lagally, et al. Single-Molecule DNA Amplification and Analysis in an Integrated Microfluidic Device. Analytical Chemistry. 2001;73(3): 565-570.
Lahue, R.S. et al., DNA mismatch correction in a defined system, Science, vol. 425; No. 4914, 160-164 (Jul. 14, 1989).
Lambrinakos, A. et al., Reactivity of potassium permanganate and tetraethylammonium chloride with mismatched bases and a simple mutation detection protocol, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, No. 8, 1866- 1874 (1999).
Landegren, et al. A ligase-mediated gene detection technique. Science. Aug. 26, 1988;241(4869):1077-80.
Lang, Matthew J. et al., An automated two-dimensional optical force clamp for single molecule studies, Biophysical Journal, vol. 83, 491-501 (Jul. 2002).
Lashkari, et al. An automated multiplex oligonucleotide synthesizer: development of high-throughput, low-cost DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 15, 1995;92(17):7912-5.
Lausted et al., POSaM: a fast, flexible, open-source, inkjet oligonucleotide synthesizer and microarrayer, Genome Biology, 5:R58, 17 pages, 2004. available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC507883/.
Leamon, et al. A massively parallel PicoTiterPlate based platform for discrete picoliter-scale polymerase chain reactions. Electrophoresis. Nov. 2003;24(21):3769-77.
Lee, Covalent end-immobilization of oligonucleotides onto solid surfaces. Thesis submitted to the Department of Chemical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aug. 2001, 315 pages.
Lee, C.S. et al., Microelectromagnets for the control of magnetic nanoparticles, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 79, No. 20, 3308-3310 (Nov. 12, 2001).
Lee, et al. A microfluidic oligonucleotide synthesizer. Nucleic Acids Research 2010 vol. 38(8):2514-2521. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq092.
Leproust, et al. Agilent's Microarray Platform: How High-Fidelity DNA Synthesis Maximizes the Dynamic Range of Gene Expression Measurements. 2008; 1-12. http://www.miltenyibiotec.com/˜/media/Files/Navigation/Genomie/020Services/Agilent_DNA_Microarray_Platform.ashx.
Leproust et al., Synthesis of high-quality libraries of long (150mer) oligonucleotides by a novel depurination controlled process, Nucleic Acids Research, 35(8):2522-2540, 2010.
Lesnikowski, et al. Nucleic acids and nucleosides containing carboranes. J. Organometallic Chem. 1999; 581:156-169.
Leumann. DNA analogues: from supramolecular principles to biological properties. Bioorg Med Chem. Apr. 2002;10(4):841-54.
Levene, et al. Zero-mode waveguides for single-molecule analysis at high concentrations. Science. Jan. 31, 2003;299(5607):682-6.
Lewontin and Harti, Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science, 254:1745-1750, 1991.
Li et al., Beating bias in the directed evolution of proteins: Combining high-fidelity on-chip solid-phase gene synthesis with efficient gene assembly for combinatorial library construction. First published Nov. 24, 2017, 2 pages. retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201700540.
Li et al. Beating Bias in the Directed Evolution of Proteins: Combining High-Fidelity on-Chip Solid-Phase Gene Synthesis with Efficient Gene Assembly for Combinatorial Library Construction. ChemBioChem 19:221-228 (2018).
Limbachiya et al., Natural data storage: A review on sending information from now to then via Nature. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, V(N):Article A, May 19, 2015, 17 pages.
Link Technologies. Product Guide 2010. Nov. 27, 2009, 136 pages. XP055353191. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.linktech.co.uk/documents/517/517.pdf.
Lipshutz, Robert J. et al., High density synthetic oligonucleotide arrays, Nature Genetics Supplement, vol. 21, 20-24 (Jan. 1999).
Lishanski, Alia et al., Mutation detection by mismatch binding protein, MutS, in amplified DNA: application to the cystic fibrosis gene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 91, 2674-2678 (Mar. 1994).
Liu et al., Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 11 pages, 2012.
Liu, et al. Enhanced Signals and Fast Nucleic Acid Hybridization by Microfluidic Chaotic Mixing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45:3618-3623.
Liu et al., Rational design of CXCR4 specific antibodies with elongated CDRs. JACS, 136:10557-10560, 2014.
Lizard!, et al. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet. Jul. 1998;19(3):225-32.
Li, Lin et al., Functional domains in Fok I restriction endonuclease, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:4275-4279, 1992.
Lu, A.-Lien et al., Methyl-directed repair of DNA base-pair mismatches in vitro, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:4639-4643, 1983.
Lund, et al. A validated system for ligation-free uracilexcision based assembly of expression vectors for mammalian cell engineering. DTU Systems of Biology. 2011. 1 page. http://www.lepublicsystemepco.com/files/modules/gestion_rubriques/REF-B036-Lund_Anne%20Mathilde.pdf.
Ma, et al. DNA synthesis, assembly and application in synthetic biology. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 16:260-267, 2012.
Ma et al., Versatile surface functionalization of cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) with sputtered SiO2 thin film for potential BioMEMS applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 11 pages, 2009.
Mahato et al., Modulation of gene expression by antisense and antigene oligodeoxynucleotides and small interfering RNA Expert Opin. Drug Delivery, 2(1):3-28, 2005.
Margulies, et al. Genome sequencing in open microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 437(7057):376-80, 2005.
Matteucci, et al. Synthesis of deoxyoligonucleotides on a polymer support. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103(11):3185-3191, 1981.
Matzas et al., Next generation gene synthesis by targeted retrieval of bead-immobilized, sequence verified DNA clones from a high throughput pyrosequencing device. Nat. Biotechnol., 28(12):1291-1294, 2010.
McBride & Caruthers, An investigation of several deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites useful for synthesizing deoxyoligonucleotides. Tetrahedron Lett. 24: 245-248, 1983.
McGall, et al. Light-directed synthesis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays using semiconductor photoresists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93(24):13555-60, 1996.
McGall, et al. The Efficiency of Light-Directed Synthesis of DNA Arrays on Glass Substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119(22):5081-5090, 1997.
Mei et al., Cell-free protein synthesis in microfluidic array devices Biotechnol. Prog., 23(6):1305-1311, 2007.
Mendel-Hartvig. Padlock probes and rolling circle amplification. New possibilities for sensitive gene detection. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1175. Uppsala University. 2002, 39 pages. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:161926/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Meyers and Friedland, Knowledge-based simulation of genetic regulation in bacteriophage lambda. Nucl. Acids Research, 12(1):1-16, 1984.
Meynert et al. Quantifying single nucleotide variant detection sensitivity in exome sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 14:195 (2013).
Meynert et al. Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 15:247 (2014).
Milo and Phillips, Numbers here reflect the number of protein coding genes and excludes tRNA and non-coding RNA. Cell Biology by the Numbers, p. 286, 2015.
Mitra, et al. In situ localized amplification and contact replication of many individual DNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 27(24):e34, 1999.
Morin et al., Profiling the HeLa S3 transcriptome using randomly primed cDNA and massively parallel short-read sequencing. Biotechniques, 45:81-94, 2008.
Morris and Stauss, Optimizing T-cell receptor gene therapy for hematologic malignancies. Blood, 127(26):3305-3311, 2016.
Muller, Caroline et al. Protection and labelling of thymidine by a fluorescent photolabile group, Helvetica Chimica Acta, vol. 84, 3735-3741 (2001).
Mulligan. Commercial Gene Synthesis Technology PowerPoint presentation. BlueHeron® Biotechnology. Apr. 5, 2006 (48 pgs).
Nakatani, Kazuhiko et al., Recognition of a single guanine bulge by 2-Acylamino-1 ,8-naphthyridine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 122, 2172-2177 (2000).
Neiman M.S,. Negentropy principle in information processing systems. Radiotekhnika, 1966, N211, p. 2-9.
Neiman M.S., On the bases of the theory of information retrieval. Radiotekhnika, 1967, No. 5, p. 2-10.
Neiman M.S., On the molecular memory systems and the directed mutations. Radiotekhnika, 1965, No. 6, pp. 1-8.
Neiman M.S., On the relationships between the reliability, performance and degree of microminiaturization at the molecular-atomic level. Radiotekhnika, 1965, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
Neiman M.S., Some fundamental issues of microminiaturization. Radiotekhnika, 1964, No. 1, pp. 3-12.
Nishikura, A short primer on RNAi: Rna-directed Rna polymerase acts as a key catalyst Cell, 107:415-418, 2001.
Nour-Eldin, et al. USER Cloning and USER Fusion: The Ideal Cloning Techniques for Small and Big Laboratories. Plant Secondary Metabolism Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 643, 2010, pp. 185-200.
Ochman, et al. Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics. Nov. 1988;120(3):621-3.
Organick et al., Random access in large-scale DNA data storage. Nature Biotechnology, Advance Online Publication, 8 pages, 2018.
Organick et al., Scaling up DNA data storage and random access retrieval, bioRxiv, preprint first posted online Mar. 7, 2017, 14 pages.
Pan, et al. An approach for global scanning of single nucleotide variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 9, 2002;99(14):9346-51.
Pankiewicz. Fluorinated nucleosides. Carbohydr Res. Jul. 10, 2000;327(1-2):87-105.
PCT/IL2012/000326 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 5, 2013.
PCT/IL2012/000326 International Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2013.
PCT/US14/049834 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 18, 2016.
PCT/US2014/049834 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2015.
PCT/US2014/049834, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, protest fee, dated Jan. 5, 2015.
PCT/US2015/043605 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 16, 2017.
PCT/US2015/043605 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 6, 2016.
PCT/US2015/043605 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Oct. 28, 2015.
PCT/US2016/016459 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 17, 2017.
PCT/US2016/016459 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2016.
PCT/US2016/016636 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 17, 2017.
PCT/US2016/016636 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 2, 2016.
PCT/US2016/028699 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 2, 2017.
PCT/US2016/028699 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2016.
PCT/US2016/031674 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 23, 2017.
PCT/US2016/031674 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2016.
PCT/US2016/052336 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 29, 2018.
PCT/US2016/052336 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 7, 2016.
PCT/US2016/052916 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 5, 2018.
PCT/US2016/052916 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 30, 2016.
PCT/US2016/064270 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 14, 2018.
PCT/US2016/064270 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 28, 2017.
PCT/US2017/026232 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2017.
PCT/US2017/036868 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2017.
PCT/US2017/045105 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 20, 2017.
PCT/US2017/052305 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2018.
PCT/US2017/062391 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2018.
PCT/US2017/066847 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2018.
PCT/US2018/022487 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 1, 2018.
PCT/US2018/022493 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 1, 2018.
PCT/US2018/037152 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2018.
PCT/US2018/037161 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Aug. 27, 2018.
PCT/US2018/19268 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 26, 2018.
PCT/US2018/19268 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, protest fee dated May 2, 2018.
PCT/US2018/22487 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, protest fee dated May 31, 2018.
PCT/US2018/22493 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, protest fee dated May 31, 2018.
Pease, et al. Light-generated oligonucleotide arrays for rapid DNA sequence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 24, 1994;91(11):5022-6.
Peisajovich, et al. BBF RFC 28: A method for combinatorial multi-part assembly based on the type-Iis restriction enzyme aarl. Sep. 16, 2009, 7 pages.
Pellois, et al. Individually addressable parallel peptide synthesis on microchips, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 20:922-926 (Sep. 2002).
Petersen, et al. LNA: a versatile tool for therapeutics and genomics. Trends Biotechnol. Feb. 2003;21(2):74-81.
Pierce, et al. Linear-after-the-exponential polymerase chain reaction and allied technologies. Real-time detection strategies for rapid, reliable diagnosis from single cells. Methods Mol Med. 2007;132:65-85.
Pirrung. How to make a DNA chip. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 41:1276-1289, 2002.
Plesa et al., Multiplexed gene synthesis in emulsions for exploring protein functional landscapes. Science, 10.1126/science.aao5167, 10 pages, 2018.
Pon. Solid-phase supports for oligonucleotide synthesis. Methods Mol Biol. 1993;20:465-96.
Poster. Reimagine Genome Scale Research. 2016, 1 page. Available at http://www2.twistbioscience.com/Oligo_Pools_CRISPR_poster.
Powers et al. Optimal strategies for the chemical and enzymatic synthesis of bihelical deoxyribonucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc., 97(4):875-884, 1975.
Pray. Discovery of DNA Structure and Function: Watson and Crick, Nature Education, 2008, 6 pages. available at: http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/discovery-of-dna-structure-and-function-watson-397.
Prodromou, et al. Recursive PCR: a novel technique for total gene synthesis. Protein Eng. Dec. 1992;5(8):827-9.
Puigbo. Optimizer: a web server for optimizing the codon usage of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acid Research, 35(14):126-131, 2007.
Qian and Winfree, Scaling up digital circuit computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Science, 332(6034):196-1201, 2011.
Qian, et al., Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades, Nature, 475(7356):368-372, 2011.
Quan, et al. Parallel on-chip gene synthesis and application to optimization of protein expression. Nature Biotechnology. 2011; 29:449-452.
Rafalski and Morgante, Corn and humans: recombination and linkage disequilibrium in two genomes of similar size. Trends in Genetics, 20(2):103-111, 2004.
Raje and Murma, A Review of electrohydrodynamic-inkjet printing technology. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4(5):174-183, 2014.
Rastegari, et al., XNOR-Net: ImageNet Classification Using Binary Convolutional Neural Networks, in ECCV 2016, Part IV, LNCS 9908, p. 525-542, 2016.
Reimagine SequenceSpace, Reimagine Research, Twist Bioscience, Product Brochure, Published Apr. 6, 2016 online at: www2.twistbioscience.com/TB_Product_Brochure_04.2016, 8 pages.
RF Electric discharge type excimer lamp. Products Catalog. Excimer lamp light source flat excimer, 16 pages dated Jan. 2016. From: http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/product/category/1001/3026/index.html.
Richmond, et al. Amplification and assembly of chip-eluted DNA (AACED): a method for high-throughput gene synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 24, 2004;32(17):5011-8. Print 2004.
Roche. Restriction Enzymes from Roche Applied Science—A Tradition of Premium Quality and Scientific Support. FAQS and Ordering Guide. Roche Applied Science. Accessed Jan. 12, 2015, 37 pages.
Rogozin et al., Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns. Biology Direct, 7:11, 2012.
Ruminy, et al., Long-range identification of hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 (FoxA) high and low-affinity binding Sites with a chimeric nuclease, J. Mol. Bioi., vol. 310, 523-535 (2001).
Saaem et al., In situ synthesis of DNA microarray on functionalized cyclic olefin copolymer substrate ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2(2):491-497, 2010.
Saboulard, et al. High-throughput site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides synthesized on DNA chips. Biotechniques. Sep. 2005;39(3):363-8.
Sacconi, L. et al., Three-dimensional magneto-optic trap for micro-object manipulation, Optics Letters, vol. 26, No. 17, 1359-1361 (Sep. 1, 2001).
Saiki et al. Analysis of enzymatically amplified beta-globin and HLA-DQ alpha DNA with allele-specific oligonucleotide probes. Nature 324:163-166 (1986).
Sandhu, et al. Dual asymmetric PCR: one-step construction of synthetic genes. Biotechniques. Jan. 1992;12(1):14-6.
Sargolzaei et al., Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America. J.Dairy Science, 91:2106-2117, 2007.
Schaller, et al. Studies on Polynucleotides. XXV.1 The Stepwise Synthesis of Specific Deoxyribopolynucleotides (5). Further Studies on the Synthesis of Internucleotide Bond by the Carbodiimide Method. The Synthesis of Suitably Protected Dinucleotides as Intermediates in the Synthesis of Higher Oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963; 85(23):3828-3835.
Schmalzing et al. Microchip electrophoresis: a method for high-speed SNP detection. Nucleic Acids Res 28(9):E43 (2000).
Schmitt et al., New strategies in engineering T-cell receptor gene-modified T cells to more effectively target malignancies. Clinical Cancer Research, 21(23):5191-5197, 2015.
Seelig, et al., Enzyme-Free Nucleic Acid Logic Circuits, Science 314(5805):1585-1588, 2006.
Sharan et al. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat Profile 4(2):1-37 (originally pp. 206-223) (2009).
Sharpe and Mount, Genetically modified T cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges. Disease Models and Mechanisms, 8:337-350, 2015.
Sierzchala, Agnieszka B. et al., Solid-phase oligodeoxynucleotide synthesis : a two-step cycle using peroxy anion deprotection, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 125, No. 44, 13427-13441 (2003).
Simonyan and Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, Published as a conference paper at Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., pp. 1-14, 2015.
Singh-Gasson, Sangeet et al., Maskless fabrication of light-directed oligonucleotide microarrays using a digital micromirror array, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, 974-978 (Oct. 1999).
Skerra. Phosphorothioate primers improve the amplification of DNA sequences by DNA polymerases with proofreading activity. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 25, 1992; 20(14):3551-4.
Smith, et al. Generating a synthetic genome by whole genome assembly: phiX174 bacteriophage from synthetic oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 23, 2003;100(26):15440-5. Epub Dec. 2, 2003.
Smith, et al. Generation of cohesive ends on PCR products by UDG-mediated excision of dU, and application for cloning into restriction digest-linearized vectors. PCR Methods Appl. May 1993;2(4):328-32.
Smith, Jane et al., Mutation detection with MutH, MutL, and MutS mismatch repair proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 93, 4374-4379 (Apr. 1996).
Smith Jane et al., Removal of Polymerase-Produced mutant sequences from PCR products, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 94, 6847-6850 (Jun. 1997).
Smith, Steven B. et al., Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules using magnetic beads, Science, vol. 258, 1122-1126 (Nov. 13, 1992).
Soni, et al. Progress toward ultrafast DNA sequencing using solid-state nanopores. Clin Chem. Nov. 2007;53(11):1996-2001. Epub Sep. 21, 2007.
Southern, et al. Analyzing and comparing nucleic acid sequences by hybridization to arrays of oligonucleotides: evaluation using experimental models. Genomics. Aug. 1992;13(4):1008-17.
Sproat, et al. An efficient method for the isolation and purification of oligoribonucleotides. Nucleosides & Nucleotides. 1995; 14(1&2):255-273.
Srivannavit et al., Design and fabrication of microwell array chips for a solution-based, photogenerated acid-catalyzed parallel oligonucleotide DNA synthesis. Sensors and Actuators A, 116:150-160, 2004.
Srivastava et al., RNA synthesis: phosphoramidites for RNA synthesis in the reverse direction. Highly efficient synthesis and application to convenient introduction of ligands, chromophores and modifications of synthetic RNA at the 3′-end, Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 52(1):103-104, 2008.
Steel, The Flow-Thru Chip a Three-dimensional biochip platform. In: Schena, Microarray Biochip Technology, Chapter 5, Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing, 2000, 33 pages.
Stemmer, et al. Single-step assembly of a gene and entire plasmid from large numbers of oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Gene. Oct. 16, 1995;164(1):49-53.
Stryer. DNA Probes and genes can be synthesized by automated solid-phase methods. Biochemistry, 3rd edition, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1988; 123-125.
Stutz, et al. Novel fluoride-labile nucleobase-protecting groups for the synthesis of 3′(2′)-O-amino-acylated RNA sequences. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2000; 83(9):2477-2503.
Sullivan et al. Library construction and evaluation for site saturation mutagenesis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 53:70-77 (2013).
Sun et al. Structure-Guided Triple-Code Saturation Mutagenesis: Efficient Tuning of the Stereoselectivity of an Epoxide Hydrolase. ACS Catal. 6:1590-1597 (2016).
Takahashi, Cell-free cloning using multiply-primed rolling circle amplification with modified RNA primers. Biotechniques. Jul. 2009;47(1):609-15. doi: 10.2144/000113155.
Tanase, M. et al., Magnetic trapping of multicomponent nanowires, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, p. 1-3 (Jun. 25, 2001).
Taylor et al., Impact of surface chemistry and blocking strategies on DNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(16):e87, 19 pages, 2003.
The Hood Laboratory, Beta Group. Assembly Manual for the POSaM: The ISB Piezoelectric Oligonucleotide Synthesizer and Microarrayer, Inkjet Microarrayer Manual Version 1.2, 50 pages, May 28, 2004.
The SLIC, Gibson, CPEC and SLiCE assembly methods (and GeneArt Seamless, In-Fusion Cloning). 5 pages, available online Sep. 2, 2010.
Tian, et al. Accurate multiplex gene synthesis from programmable DNA microchips. Nature. Dec. 23, 2004;432(7020):1050-4.
Tsai et al., Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided Fokl nucleases for highly specific genome editing Nat. Biotechnol., 32(6):569-576, 2014.
Twist Bioscience | White Paper. DNA-Based Digital Storage. Retrieved from the internet, Twistbioscience.com, Mar. 27, 2018, 5 pages.
Unger, et al. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science. Apr. 7, 2000;288(5463):113-6.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,874 Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,874 Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,874 Office Action dated May 4, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,429 Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,429 Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,429 Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 12, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,962 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2017 and dated Sep. 29, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,962 Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,962 Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,962 Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 1, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,963 Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/885,965 Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,434 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,434 Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,434 Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 12, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/151,316 Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,879 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,721 Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,721 Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,835 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,835 Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,835 Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,835 Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 4, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/245,054 Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/245,054 Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/377,547 Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/377,547 Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/377,547 Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,991 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,991 Office Action dated May 31, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,991 Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/603,013 Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/603,013 Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/603,013 Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,100 Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,100 Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 8, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/729,564 Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/860,445 Office Action dated May 30, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,429 Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015.
Vaijayanthi, et al. Recent advances in oligonucleotide synthesis and their applications. Indian J Biochem Biophys. Dec. 2003;40(6):377-91.
Van Den Brulle, et al. A novel solid phase technology for high-throughput gene synthesis. Biotechniques. 2008; 45(3):340-343.
Van Der Werf et al. Limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase from Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 belongs to a novel class of epoxide hydrolases. J. Bacteriol. 180:5052-5057 (1998).
Van Tassell et al., SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nature Methods, 5:247-252, 2008.
Vargeese, et al. Efficient activation of nucleoside phosphoramidites with 4,5-dicyanoimidazole during oligonucleotide synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 15, 1998;26(4):1046-50.
Verma et al. Modified oligonucleotides: synthesis and strategy for users. Annu Rev Biochem 67:99-134 (1998).
Vincent, et al. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep. 2004 Aug;5(8):795-800.
Visscher et al., Construction of multiple-beam optical traps with nanometer-resolution position sensing, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 2, No. 4, 1066-1076 (Dec. 1996).
Voldmans Joel et al., Holding forces of single-particle dielectrophoretic traps. Biophysical Journal, vol. 80, No. 1, 531-541 (Jan. 2001).
Vos, et al. AFLP:A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 11, 1995;23(21):4407-14.
Wagner et al., Nucleotides, Part LXV, Synthesis of 2′-Deoxyribonucleoside 5′-Phosphoramidites: New Building Blocks for the Inverse (5′-3′)-0iigonucleotide Approach. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 83(8):2023-2035, 2000.
Wah, David A. et al., Structure of Fok I has implications for DNA cleavage, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 95, 10564-10569 (Sep. 1998).
Wah, David A. et al., Structure of the multimodular endonuclease Fok I bound to DNA, Nature, vol. 388, 97-100 ( Jul. 1997).
Walker, et al. Strand displacement amplification--an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 11, 1992;20(7):1691-6.
Wan et al., Deep Learning for Content-Based Image Retrieval: A comprehensive study. in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia—Nov. 3-7, 2014, Orlando, FL, p. 157-166, 2014.
Warr et al. Exome Sequencing: current and future perspectives. G3: (Bethesda) 5(8):1543-1550 (2015).
Weber, et al. A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PLoS One. Feb. 18, 2011;6(2):e16765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016765.
Welz, et al. 5-(Benzylmercapto)-1H-tetrazole as activator for 2′-O-TBDMS phosphoramidite building blocks in RNA synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43(5):795-797.
Westin et al., Anchored multiplex amplification on a microelectronic chip array Nature Biotechnology, 18:199-202 (2000) (abstract only).
Whitehouse, Adrian et al. Analysis of the mismatch and insertion/deletion binding properties of Thermus thermophilus, HB8, MutS, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 233, 834-837 (1997).
Wiedenheft et al., RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature, 482:331-338, 2012.
Wijshoff, Herman. Structure and fluid-dynamics in Piezo inkjet printheads. Thesis. Venio, The Netherlands, published 2008, p. 1-185.
Wirtz, Denis, Direct measurement of the transport properties of a single DNA molecule, Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, No. 12, 2436-2439 (Sep. 18, 1995).
Withers-Martinez, Chrislaine et al., PCR-based gene synthesis as an efficient approach for expression of the A+ T-rich malaria genome, Protein Engineering, vol. 12, No. 12, 1113-1120 (1999).
Wood, Richard D. et al., Human DNA repair genes, Science, vol. 291, 1284-1289 (Feb. 16, 2001).
Wosnick, et al. Rapid construction of large synthetic genes: total chemical synthesis of two different versions of the bovine prochymosin gene. Gene. 1987;60(1):115-27.
Wright and Church, An open-source oligomicroarray standard for human and mouse. Nature Biotechnology, 20:1082-1083, 2002.
Wu, et al. RNA-mediated gene assembly from DNA arrays. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. May 7, 2012;51(19):4628-32. doi: 10.1002/anie.201109058.
Wu, et al. Specificity of the nick-closing activity of bacteriophage T4 DNA ligase. Gene. 1989;76(2):245-54.
Wu, Xing-Zheng et al., An improvement of the on-line electrophoretic concentration method for capillary electrophoresis of proteins an experimental factors affecting he concentration effect, Analytical Sciences, vol. 16, 329-331 (Mar. 2000).
Xiong, et al. A simple, rapid, high-fidelity and cost-effective PCR-based two-step DNA synthesis method for long gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32(12):e98.
Xiong et al., Chemical gene synthesis: Strategies, softwares, error corrections, and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 32:522-540, 2008.
Xiong, et al. Non-polymerase-cycling-assembly-based chemical gene synthesis: Strategies, methods, and progress. Biotechnology Advances. 26(2):121-134, 2008.
Xu et al., Design of 240,000 orthogonal 25mer DNA barcode probes. PNAS, 106(7):2289-2294, 2009.
Yang, et al Purification, cloning, and characterization of the CEL I nuclease, Biochemistry, 39(13):3533-35, 2000.
Yazdi, et al., A Rewritable, Random-Access DNA-Based Storage System, Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 14138, 27 pages, 2015.
Yehezkel et al., De novo DNA synthesis using single molecule PCR Nucleic Acids Research, 36(17):e107, 2008.
Yes HMDS vapor prime process application note Prepared by UC Berkeley and University of Texas at Dallas and re-printed by Yield Engineering Systems, Inc., 6 pages (http://www.yieldengineering.com/Portals/0/HMDS%20Application%20Note.pdf (Published online Aug. 23, 2013).
Youil, Rima et al., Detection of 81 of 81 known mouse beta-globin promoter mutations with T4 Endonuclease VII. The EMC Method, Genomics, 32:431-435, 1996.
Young, et al. Two-step total gene synthesis method. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(7):e59, 2004.
Zhang and Seelig, Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions, Nat. Chem., 3(2):103-113, 2011.
Zheleznaya, et al. Nicking endonucleases. Biochemistry (Mosc). 74(13):1457-66, 2009.
Zheng et al. Manipulating the Stereoselectivity of Limonene Epoxide Hydrolase by Directed Evolution Based on Iterative Saturation Mutagenesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:15744-15751 (2010).
Zhirnov et al., Nucleic acid memory. Nature Materials, 15:366, 2016.
Zhou et al., Microfluidic PicoArray synthesis of oligodeoxynucleotides and simultaneous assembling of multiple DNA sequences Nucleic Acids Research, 32(18):5409-5417, 2004.
Eroshenko et al.: Gene Assembly from Chip-Synthesized Oligonucleotides; Current Protocols in Chemical biology 4: 1-17 (2012).
European Patent Application No. 16871446.7 First Official Action dated Nov. 13, 2019.
Galka et al.: QuickLib, a method for building fully synthetic plasmid libraries by seamless cloning of degenerate oligonucleotides. PLOS ONE, 12, e0175146:1-9 (2017).
Galka et al.: QuickLib, a method for building fully synthetic plasmid libraries by seamless cloning of degenerate oligonucleotides. PLOS ONE, 12, e0175146:S1 figure (2017).
Galka et al.: QuickLib, a method for building fully synthetic plasmid libraries by seamless cloning of degenerate oligonucleotides. PLOS ONE, 12, e0175146:S1 Table (2017).
Galka et al.: QuickLib, a method for building fully synthetic plasmid libraries by seamless cloning of degenerate oligonucleotides. PLOS ONE, 12, e0175146:52 figure (2017).
International Application No. PCT/US2018/019268 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 6, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2019/032992 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2019.
International Application No. PCT/US2019/032992 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Sep. 6, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,874 Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,059 Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,059 Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/151,316 Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/156,134 Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,714 Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,422 Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/603,013 Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,322 Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,995 Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,342 Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,342 Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 10, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,479 Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/960,319 Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/006,581 Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/239,453 Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,608 Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,717 Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2019.
Alberts et al.: Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. New York: Garland Science; 2002. The Generation of Antibody Diversity. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26860/.
Almagro et al.: Progress and Challenges in the Design and Clinical Development of Antibodies for Cancer Therapy. Frontiers in immunology; 8, 1751 (2018) doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01751 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01751/full.
Chervin et al.: Design of T-cell receptor libraries with diverse binding properties to examine adoptive T-cell responses. Gene Therapy. 20(6):634-644 (2012).
Cui et al.: Information Security Technology Based on DNA Computing. International Workshop on Anti-Counterfeiting, Security and Identification (ASID); IEEE Xplore 4 page (2007).
European Patent Application No. 17844060.8 Extended Search Report dated Apr. 20, 2020.
European Patent Application No. 17872347.4 Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 30, 2020.
European Patent Application No. 17881617.9 European Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 2, 2020.
Goodwin et al.: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region, partial [Homo sapiens]. Genbank entry (online). National Institute of Biotechnology Information. (2018) https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/protein/AXA12486.1.
Hauser et al.: Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 16, 829-842 (2017). doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.178 https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.178.
Hopcroft et al.: What is the Young's Modulus of Silicon?. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 19(2):229-238 (2010).
Hötzel et al.: A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance. mAbs, 4(6), 753-760 (2012). doi:10.4161/mabs.22189 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778268.
Jaiswal et al.: An architecture for creating collaborative semantically capable scientific data sharing infrastructures. Proceeding WIDM '06 Proceedings of the 8th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management. ACM Digital Library pp. 75-82 (2006).
Kosuri et al.: A scalable gene synthesis platform using high-fidelity DNA microchips Nat.Biotechnol., 28(12):1295-1299, 2010.
Malecek et al.: Engineering improved T cell receptors using an alanine-scan guided T cell display selection system. Journal of Immunological Methods. Elsevier Science Publishers. 392(1):1-11 (2013).
(Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research) Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain [Homo sapiens]. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Genbank Entry. pp. 1-2 (2018) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH975524.1ttps://https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH975524.1.
(Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research) Immunoglobulin Lambda Chain [Homo sapiens]. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Genbank Entry. pp. 1-2 (2018) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH975524.1.
Paul et al.: Acid binding and detritylation during oligonucleotide synthesis. Nucleic Acids Research. 15. pp. 3048-3052 (1996).
PCT/US2018/037152 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 17, 2019.
PCT/US2018/037161 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 17, 2019.
PCT/US2018/050511 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 17, 2020.
PCT/US2018/056783 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 30, 2020.
PCT/US2018/057857 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 28, 2020.
PCT/US2019/012218 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 16, 2020.
PCT/US2019/068435 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2020.
PCT/US2020/019371 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2020.
PCT/US2020/019986 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2020.
PCT/US2020/019986 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Jun. 5, 2020.
PCT/US2020/019988 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2020.
PCT/US2020/019988 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Jun. 8, 2020.
PubChem Data Sheet Acetonitrile. Printed from website https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nig.gov/ pp. 1-124 (2020).
PubChem Data Sheet Methylene Chloride. Printed from website https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pp. 1-140 (2020).
Rajpal et al.: A general method for greatly improving the affinity of antibodies by using combinatorial libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(24):8466-8471 (2005).
Solomon et al.: Genomics at Agilent: Driving Value in DNA Sequencing.https://www.agilent.com/labs/features/2010_genomics.html, 8 pages (Aug. 5, 2010).
U.S. Appl. No. 15/151,316 Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/272,004 Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,322 Final Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,995 Office Action dated May 19, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,342 Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/844,395 Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,479 Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/991,992 Office Action dated May 21, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/991,992 Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 10, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/039,256 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/039,256 Restriction Requirement dated May 18, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/128,372 Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/128,372 Restriction Requirement dated May 18, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,952 Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/239,453 Office Action dated May 11, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/384,678 Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,717 Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/535,777 Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/535,779 First Action Interview dated Feb. 10, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/921,537 Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2020.
Van der Velde: Thesis. Finding the Strength of Glass. Delft University of Technology. 1-16 (2015).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180312834 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (5)
Number Date Country
62419881 Nov 2016 US
62411388 Oct 2016 US
62393948 Sep 2016 US
62382191 Aug 2016 US
62378134 Aug 2016 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15682100 Aug 2017 US
Child 16031784 US