Deactivants for dust mite allergens

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20050008579
  • Publication Number
    20050008579
  • Date Filed
    August 05, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 13, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
Der-f and/or Der-p dust mite allergens are deactivated by an amount of L-ascorbic acid. Spray compositions comprise said deactivant in aqueous form or in aerosol form with propellant and optional solvent.
Description

It has been known for a long time that house dust can trigger allergenic reactions in humans, such as asthma and rhinitis. It was reported, as early as 1928, that it was the dust mites in the dust that were the primary source of the allergenic response but it was only in the 1960's that researchers appreciated its significance.


It is believed that the faeces of two particular house dust mite species, Dermatophagoides farinae (known as Der-f) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (known as Der-p) trigger the immune responses of the body, thereby giving rise to well known allergenic symptoms.


A review of this is given in Experimental and Applied Acarology, 10 (1991) p. 167-186 in an article entitled “House dust-mite allergen”: A review by L. G. Arlian.


Both the Der-f and Der-p species are found throughout the world. In some areas, Der-f will be the sole Dermatophagoides species. In other areas Der-p will be the sole species. In still other areas, the two species are both present through, generally, one or the other will predominate.


One way to overcome these allergenic response has been to vacuum surfaces, such as carpets, that contain the dust mites and their faeces thoroughly and often, but that is both time consuming (i.e. has to be regularly done if one wants to make an allergenic free environment) and is very dependant on the efficiency of vacuum cleaner and filter bag used e.g. micron filter bag or 2-layer vacuum bags.


An alternative method of creating an allergen-free environment has been to denature the allergen, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,806,526. The only effective method however of which we are aware is to apply tannic acid to the allergen. However, tannic acid can cause staining, and this is a particularly acute problem for light coloured carpets (e.g. white and light beige carpets) and other textile surfaces as tannic acid leaves a deep brown stain.


Therefore, we have been looking for allergenic denaturants which will not stain susceptible surfaces such as carpets and still deactivate the allergen.


We have discovered a number of allergen deactivants which are effective against both the Der-f and the Der-p species. Quite surprisingly, we have discovered that some of these deactivants are specific to the type of dust mite allergen being treated. For example an effective Der-f allergen deactivants will not automatically work effectively as a Der-p allergen deactivant.


According to the invention there is provided a method for deactivating allergens derived from the Der-f and/or Der-p dust mite species, which comprises contacting the allergen with a deactivating effective amount of one or more of deactivants (herein after defined as the deactivant).


The deactivants effective against one or both of Der-f allergens and Der-p allergens are:

    • i) cedarwood oil,
    • ii) hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride,
    • iii) aluminium chlorohydrate,
    • iv) 1-propoxy-propanol-2,
    • v) polyquaternium-10
    • vi) silica gel,
    • vii) propylene glycol alginate,
    • viii) ammonium sulphate,
    • ix) hinokitiol,
    • x) L-ascorbic acid,
    • xi) “immobilised tannic acid”, (hereinafter defined)
    • xii) chlorohexidine,
    • xiii) maleic anhydride,
    • xiv) hinoki oil,
    • xv) a composite of AgCl and TiO2,
    • xvi) diazolidinyl urea,
    • xvii) 6-isopropyl-m-cresol,
    • xviii) a compound of formula I
      embedded image
    • xix) the compound of formula II
      embedded image
    • xx) a polymeric dialdehyde containing two or more of a recurring unit of the formula III
      embedded image

      where n=2 to 200,
    • xxi) urea,
    • xxii) cyclodextrin,
    • xxiii) hydrogenated hop oil,
    • xxiv) polyvinylpyrrolidone,
    • xxv) N-methylpyrrolidone,
    • xxvi) the sodium salt of anthraquinone,
    • xxvii) potassium thioglycolate, and
    • xxviii) glutaraldehyde


      Deactivants (i) through (xx) are effective against both Der-f and Der-p allergens. Deactivants (xxi) through (xxvi) are effective against Der-f allergens only. Deactivants (xxvii) and (xxviii) are effective against Der-p allergens only.


A compound of formula I is commercially available as Aerosol OT.


The compound of formula II is commercially available as parsley camphor.


Hinoki oil is a mixture of thujan-3-one, 2-pinene, 3,5,7,3′,4′-pentahydroflavanone and 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-norcamphanone.


Hydrogenated Hop Oil is the potassium salt of tetrahydroiso humulinic acid (also known as reduced isomerised hop extract).


Propylene glycol alginate is
embedded image


Chlorohexadine is 1,1′-hexamnethylenebis [5-(4-chlorophenyl)]-biguanide.


Hinokitol is β-thujaplicin, a compound of the formula
embedded image


Germall II is diazolidinylurea.


Thymol is 6-isopropyl-m-cresol.


Cedarwood oil contains α- and β-cedrene (ca 80%), cedrol (3-14%) and cedrenol. Other sesquiterpenes and some monoterpenes are also present.


Polyquaternium-10 is a polymeric quaternary ammonium salt of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with a trimethyl ammonium substituted epoxide commercially available as Polymer JR-125.


Silica gel is also known as colloidal silica or silicic acid and is commercially available as Kent.


“Immobilised tannic acid” is tannic acid on polyvinyl pyrrolidone beads. Immobilised Tannic Acid was prepared as follows: 100 mg of tannic acid was dissolved in water; 50 mg of Polyclar 10 (ISP, Guildford Surrey) polyvinyl pyrrolidone beads were added and stirred for one hour; the beads were filtered off the solution and washed with a few mls of iced water until no colour was seen in the washings; they were then dried in the oven at 50° C.


The composite of silver chloride and TiO2 is made up of 20% wt/wt AgCl on 80% TiO2 3-5 μm porous beads.


In compositions containing the deactivant, the deactivant is present in an amount of from 0.01% to 7%, preferably from 0.01% to 3%.


In methods for treating rugs and carpets to deactivate allergents, the amount of deactivant present is from about 16 gm to about 170 gm per 10 square meters, preferably about 32 gm per 10 square meters.


Preferably the deactivant is selected from

    • xiv) hinoki oil,
    • xv) a composite of AgCl and TiO2,
    • xvi) diazolidinyl urea
    • xvii) 6-isopropyl-m-cresol,
    • xii) chlorohexidine,
    • xiii) maleic anhydride,
    • xxvi) the sodium salt of anthraquinone and
    • xviii) a compound of formula I or II, defined above, and
    • xix) a compound of formula II, defined above.


Further according to the invention there is provided an aerosol composition containing

    • i) cedarwood oil,
    • ii) hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride,
    • iii) aluminium chlorohydrate,
    • iv) 1-propoxy-propanol-2,
    • v) polyquaternium-10
    • vi) silica gel,
    • vii) propylene glycol alginate,
    • viii) ammonium sulphate,
    • ix) hinokitiol,
    • x) L-ascorbic acid,
    • xi) “immobilised tannic acid”, (hereinafter defined)
    • xii) chlorohexidine,
    • xiii) maleic anhydride,
    • xiv) hinoki oil,
    • xv) a composite of AgCl and TiO2.
    • xvi) diazolidinyl urea,
    • xvii) 6-isopropyl-m-cresol,
    • xviii) a compound of formula I
      embedded image
    • xix) the compound of formula II
      embedded image
    • xx) a polymeric dialdehyde containing two or more of a recurring unit of the formula III
      embedded image

      where n=2 to 200,
    • xxi) urea,
    • xxii) cyclodextrin,
    • xxiii) hydrogenated hop oil,
    • xxiv) polyvinylpyrrolidone,
    • xxv) N-methylpyrrolidone,
    • xxvi) the sodium salt of anthraquinone,
    • xxvii) potassium thioglycolate, and
    • xxviii) glutaraldehyde
    • b) a propellant, and
    • c) optionally, a solvent.


Preferably the amount of deactivant present in such a composition is from 0.01% to 7%, more preferably 0.01% to 3%,


Preferably the amount of propellant present in such a composition is from 4% to 50%, more preferably from 4% to 30%,


Preferably the amount of solvent present in such a composition is 0% to 99.95%, more preferably 0% to 90%, and most preferably from 20% to 90%.


Preferably the deactivant in such aerosol composition is selected from

    • hinoki oil,
    • a composite of AgCl with TiO2,
    • diazolidinyl urea,
    • 6-isopropyl-m-cresol,
    • chlorohexidine,
    • maleic anhydride,
    • the sodium salt of anthraquinone, and
    • a compound of formula I or II: defined above.


Preferably the propellant is selected from those commercially available, for example C1-4 alkanes, chlorofluorocarbons and compressed gases such as nitrogen, air and carbon dioxide.


Preferably the solvent is selected from C1-6 alcohols (e.g. ethanol) or water.


In addition, the compositions of this invention may also contain one or more of the following:

    • a fragrance, preferably in an amount of 0% to 5%, more preferably 0% to 2%;
    • an antimicrobial compound e.g. alkyldimethylbenzyl ammonium saccharinate, preferably in an amount of 0.01% to 1%;
    • a surfactant, e.g. Dow Corning 193 Surfactant, preferably in an amount of 0.01% to 1%;
    • a corrosion inhibitor, e.g. sodium nitrite, sodium benzoate, triethanolamine and ammonium hydroxide, preferably in an amount of 0.01% to 10%; and
    • a miticide, such as benzyl benzoate, pyrethroid pemethrin, d-allethrin and optionally a synergist such as piperonyl butoxide, preferably in an amount of 0.1% to 10%.


It has been found that deactivants of the invention have as effective allergen deactivating properties as tannic acid but without the drawback of staining.


The invention will now be illustrated by the following Examples.







EXAMPLES

The test procedure in Examples 1 to 55 is as follows and is known as the ELISA protocol.


The ELISA protocol for Der-f and Der-p has been developed as follows as a measure of denaturing property for denaturants.


ELISA Protocol 1


1. Dust is collected from Hoover™ vacuum cleaner bags and passed through a series of sieves down to 63 microns.


2. Clean petri dishes are labelled with the chemical to be tested (on the base). Three replicates are used for each treatment.


3. Filter paper is used to line each dish and 0.2 g of dust is added to each dish onto the filter paper. The lid (or base, as dishes are inverted) is replaced and the dish is shaken to disperse the dust evenly over the filter paper.


4. 2% aqueous solutions of deactivant were used except for the silver chloride composite where 0.05% was used instead. Immobilised tannic acid was used as a 1% dispersion. The hydrogenerated hop end was used at the 2% level (in the form of a 10% solution). Water-insoluble deactivants were emulsified with a sorbitone oleate surfactant (i.e. Tween). Hinokitol was used at 0.5% not 2%.


5. The dust is sprayed with the corresponding treatment, 2 sprays are required for sufficient coverage(1 spray=1.5 ml).


6. Leave uncovered at room temperature, in well aerated room, until filter paper is dry. This can take up to 4 hours.


7. Empty dust in epindorfs labelled according to treatment.


8. Add 1 ml of 5% Bovine Serum Albumen Phosphate Butter Saline—Tween BSA-PBS-T to each epindorf (5 times the weight of dust) (20 ml of BSA-PBS-T=1 g of BSA in 20 ml of PBS-T).


9. Leave overnight in a refrigerator.


10. Centrifuge for 5 minutes at 13,000 rpm.


11. Decant the supernatant into a new epindorf labelled according to treatment.


12. Centrifuge again for 5 minutes at 13,000 rpm.


13. Make up dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 by adding 100 μl of neat solution to 900 μl of 1% BSA-PBS-T (1:10). This is repeated using 100 μl of 1:10 dilution and add to 900 μl of 1% BSA-PBS-T for 1:100 dilution.


ELISA Protocol 2 for Der-f and Der-p: Indoor Biotechnologies


1. Prepare samples and dilutions as in protocol


2. Prepare 500 ml of 50 mM carbonate/bicarbonate buffer by dissolving 0.795 g Na2CO3 and 1.465 g NaHCO3 in 500 ml of distilled water. Check the pH is at 9.6. (This solution is kept in the refrigerator in a conical flask).


3. Monoclonal antibody (kept in the freezer) has to be added to the buffer using the following method, (1 μg per well; 11 ml is needed) applied to the ELISA plate

    • 11 ml of carbonate/bicarbonate buffer is added to the dispensing tray.
    • 11 μl of Der-f1 or Der-p1 monoclonal antibody


(Stored in freezer, epindorf in use is in the refrigerator) is added to the buffer. To ensure that all the antibody is removed from the tip, wash out the pipette tip by sucking up and down I the buffer solution, gently stirring to mix thoroughly.


4. Pipette 100 μl of the antibody solution into each well of the microtiter plate, cover with a plate sealer and leave overnight at 4° C.


5. Empty the plate by quickly inverting it over the sink, then dry by banging on a stack of paper towels.


6. Add 200 μl of wash buffer to each well: PBS/0/05% tween (PBS-T).


7. Repeat stages 5 and 6 once more (making a total of 2 washes).


8. Make sure all the wells are dry, then add 100 μl of 1% BSA-PBS-T. Replace the plate sealer and incubate for 1 hour at room temperature*.


9. Repeat steps 5 to 7 (2 washes).


10. *During the hour incubation period, prepare the allergen standards at dilutions between 125 and 1 μg/ml Der f 1 or Der p1:

    • Add 25 μl of allergen standard (kept in the refrigerator in polystyrene box) to 475 μl of 1% PBS-BSA-T and mix thoroughly—labelled ‘125’.
    • 250 μl of 1% PBS-BSA-T is added to 7 further epindorfs which are labelled 62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.61, 3.9, 1.95 and 0.98.
    • 250 μl is taken from the 1st epindorf (labelled 125) and transferred to the next (labelled 62.5). This is mixed thoroughly.
    • Using a new pipette tip, 250 μl is removed from epindorf labelled 62.5 and transferred to 31.25, this procedure is continued down to the 0.98 concentration (125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.61, 3.9, 1.95, 0.98)
    • In total 475+(250×7)=2.3ml : 0.023 g of BSA added to 2.3 ml of PBS-T.


11. Add 100 μl aliquots of the allergen sample to the plate along with the standard allergen samples for the reference curve in duplicate. The standards usually go in the first two columns on the left hand side, with the least concentrated on top. Incubate for 1 hour.


12. Follow stages 5 to 6, completing a total of 5 washes.


13. Pour 11 ml of 1% BSA-PBS-T(0.11 g of BSA to 11 ml of PBS-T) to the dispensing tray. Add 11 μl of the biotinylated monoclonal antibody (refrigerator) and mix thoroughly.


14. Pipette 100 μl into each well and incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.


15. Empty plate and wash as described in stage 12. (5 washes).


16. Add 11 μl of Streptavidin (freezer) to 11 ml of 1% BSA-PBS-T. Pipette 100 μl into each well and incubate for 30 minutes. Reserve any remaining solution in a vial.


17. Empty plate and wash as described in stage 12 (5 washes).


18. Make a solution of OPD, by putting the two tablets (in silver and gold foil) into 20 ml of distilled water (in a glass vial). Shake quite vigorously in the dark until the tablets have dissolved (Wrap the vial up either in tin foil or paper towel).


19. Add a small amount to the remaining solution from stage 16. Wait for a colour change (positive reaction). Add 200 μl to each well and incubate for a minimum of 30 minutes in the dark.


20. Read the plate at 450 nm/405 nm if filter not available.


Examples 1 to 26

The deactivants, as set out in the following table, were used against Der-f allergens according to the above procedure and the results are as given below. Tannic acid was used as a comparator. What was measured after treatment with deactivant and tannic acid was the amount of allergen remaining active after treatment. The ratio of amount of remaining active allergen after treatment with deactivant and tannic acid is also given.

TABLEAmount ofRatio of remainingAllergenactive allergenAmount of Allergenremaining activeafterremaining active afterafter tannic acidDeactivant/TannicExampleDeactivantdeactivant treatmenttreatmentAcid TreatmentNumber1Urea375015002.500xxi2Polymeric dialdehyde13255502.409xx3Cedarwood oil18007502.400i4Cyclodextrin385017002.265xxii5hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride407518002.264ii6Aluminium chlorohydrate16757502.233iii71-propoxy-propanol-2395018002.194iv8Silica Gel (Kent)2037.5933.52.183vi9polyquaternium-10 (Polymer JR-125)433520002.168v10Hydrogenated Hop Oil11005502.000xxiii11Propylene glycol alginate317517001.868vii12Poly vinyl pyrrolidone245014251.719xxiv13Ammonium sulphate275017001.618viii14Hinokitol (0.5%)306520001.533ix15N-methyl pyrrolidone160011751.362xxv16L-Ascorbic Acid200015001.333x17Immobilised Tannic Acid155011751.319xi18Aerosol OT152511751.298xviii19Chlorohexidine1412.514250.991xii20Parsley Camphor12251387.50.883xix21Maleic anhydride1312.515000.875xiii22Anthraquinone sodium salt153020000.765xxvi23Hinoki oil10251387.50.739xiv24Composite of AgCl and TiO2102514250.719xv25Germall II9501387.50.685xvi26Thymol7251387.50.523xvii


Examples 27 to 47

The deactivants, as set out in the following table, were used against Der-p allergens according to the above procedure and the results are as given below. What was measured were the amount of allergens remaining after treatment with deactivant and the amount of allergens remaining after vacuuming with no deactivant treatment.

TABLEAmount ofactive Allergenremaining afterdeactivantExampleDeactivanttreatmentDeactivantAmountof activeAllergenremaining afterno deactivanttreatment butonly vaccuming1Glutaraldehyde 8163375xxviii2Polymeric dialdehyde27923375xx3Cedarwood oil33756000i4hexadecyltrimethylammonium28634992iichloride5Aluminium chlorohydrate 9784992iii61-propoxy-propanol-212334992iv7Silica Gel (Kent)15404992vi8polyquaternium-1054636250v(Polymer JR-125)9Propylene glycol alginate37816250vii10Ammonium sulphate23256250viii11Potassium thioglycolate30923375xxviiAmount ofAllergenremainingafter nodeactivanttreatment12Hinokitol (0.5%)20583375ix13L-Ascorbic Acid14385642x14Immobilised Tannic Acid11255642xi15Aerosol OT44945642xviii16Chlorohexidine22814450xii17Parsley Camphor25814450xix18Maleic anhydride 7834450xiii19Hinoki oil16443400xiv20Composite of AgCl and TiO216323400xv21Thymol15003400xvii


Examples 48-55

Further samples were tested as above and compared against tannic acid. The ratio of actives remaining after deactivant treatment and actives remaining after tannic acid treatment are given below:

Ratio of activesremaining afterdeactivant treatmentover those remainingafter tannic acidExampleDeactivanttreatmentNumber48Germall II1.5vi49N-methyl pyrrolidone4.0xv50Hinoki Oil4.0iv51Silver chloride/TiO23.5v52Thymol4.0vii53Chlorohexidine3.0ii54Maleic1.0iiianhydride55Glutaraldehyde1.5xviii


Examples 56-59

The following formulations can be made up as carrier compositions for use in an aerosol for deactivating Der-f and Der-p allergens.


Example 56




















Raw Ingredient





Description



By Weight
Item Classification
%




















Anhydrous Ethanol (SD
Solvent
79.646



Alcohol 40)



Alkyl dimethyl benzyl
Cationic Surfactant
0.106



ammonium saccharinate



Corrosion Inhibitor (I)

0.192



Corrosion Inhibitor (II)

0.192



Corrosion Inhibitor (III)

0.096



Deionized Water
Water/Solvent
15.768



Carbon Dioxide
Propellant
4.000



TOTAL

100.000










Example 57




















Raw Ingredient
Item




Description by Weight
Classification
%




















Anhydrous Ethanol (SD
Solvent
*57.000



Alcohol 40)



Fragrance#17
Fragrance
0.0500



Dow Corning 193
Surfactant
0.025



Surfactant



Corrosion Inhibitor (I)

0.100



Corrosion Inhibitor (II)

0.100



Deionized Water
Water/solvent
*14.725



NP-40/Butane 40
Hydrocarbon
28.000




propellant




TOTAL

100.000









*= May replace with 95% Ethanol (SD Alcohol 40) at 61.755% by weight and 9.970% by weight Deionized water







Example 58




















Raw Ingredient
Item




Description by Weight
Classification
%




















Anhydrous Ethanol (SD
Solvent
79.646



Alcohol 40)



Benzyl Benzoate —an
Active/ester
4.600



acaricide



Alkyl dimethyl benzyl
Cationic Surfactant
0.106



ammonium saccharinate



Corrosion Inhibitor (I)

0.192



Corrosion Inhibitor (II)

0.192



Corrosion Inhibitor (III)

0.096



Deionized Water
Water/solvent
11.168



Carbon Dioxide
Propellant
4.000



TOTAL

100.000










Example 59




















Raw Ingredient
Item




Description by Weight
Classification
%




















Anhydrous Ethanol (SD
Solvent
*57.000



Alcohol 40)



Benzyl Benzoate
Active/ester
4.600



Fragrance#17
Fragrance
0.0500



Dow Corning 193
Surfactant
0.025



Surfactant



Corrosion Inhibitor (I)

0.100



Corrosion Inhibitor (II)

0.100



Deionized Water
Water/solvent
*10.125



NP-40/Butane 40
Hydrocarbon
28.000




propellant




TOTAL

100.000









*= May replace 95% Ethanol (SD Alcohol 40) at 61.755% by weight and 5.370% by weight Deionized water.






Claims
  • 1. A method for deactivating a Der-f and/or a Der-p allergen comprising contacting the allergen with a deactivating effective amount of L-ascorbic acid.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 in which the allergen is a Der-f allergen.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 in which the allergen is a Der-p allergen.
  • 4. A method for deactivating allergens deriving from Der-f and/or Der-p dust mites, said allergens being associated with faecal particles excreted by said mites on the surfaces of fabric materials selected from rugs, carpet and upholstered furniture, which method comprises applying to said fabric materials L-ascorbic acid.
  • 5. A method according to claim 4 in which the allergens derive from Der-f dust mites.
  • 6. A method according to claim 4 in which the allergens derive from Der-p dust mites.
  • 7. A sprayable composition comprising L-ascorbic acid as a deactivant.
  • 8. A composition according to claim 7 which is an aqueous composition.
  • 9. A composition according to claim 7 which is an aerosol composition comprising said deactivant, a propellant and, optionally, a solvent.
  • 10. A composition according to claim 9 in which the amount of deactivant present is from 0.01% to 7%, the amount of propellant present is from 0.05% to 3%, and the amount of solvent present is from 0% to 99.95%, all percentages being by weight.
  • 11. A composition according to claim 10 in which the propellant is selected from the group consisting of C1-4 alkanes and carbon dioxide.
  • 12. A composition according to claim 10 in which the solvent is selected from the group consisting of C1-6 alcohols, water and mixtures thereof.
  • 13. A composition according to claim 12 in which the solvent is ethanol.
  • 14. A composition according to claim 7 which additionally comprises one or more of a fragrance, a surfactant, an antimicrobial agent, a corrosion inhibitor, and a miticide.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
9720275.8 Sep 1997 GB national
9720298.0 Sep 1997 GB national
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09509308 May 2000 US
Child 10911895 Aug 2004 US