The present invention relates generally to the field of engine systems having valve trains capable of being deactivated hydraulically. It finds particular application in conjunction with deactivating roller followers used to deactivate individual valves in an internal combustion engine and will be described with particular reference thereto. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is also amenable to other like applications.
Deactivating rocker arm assemblies are generally known in the art for their use in internal combustion engines and are typically used to deactivate exhaust and intake valves. This is done as part of an overall strategy to selectively deactivate one or more combustion chambers (or cylinders) of the engine to conserve fuel during idle or low load conditions. Combined with the primary benefit of not consuming fuel in the deactivated cylinders, deactivating the valves further enhances efficiency by preventing the pistons of the deactivated cylinders from using engine power to pump air through the engine.
However, a common problem involves the reliability of known deactivating rocker arm assemblies to consistently activate or deactivate a given valve upon demand. The root cause of these failures typically involve the latching components that are responsible for engaging an oscillating finger, lever, or arm and transmitting the high load forces generated by a rotating cam lobe to the stem of a valve. In some cases, the failure can be attributed to a misalignment of the latching components which inhibit positive engagement between the oscillating arm and the stationary latch of the rocker arm. Poor alignment can result from an inadequate design, poor manufacturing tolerance, and or long term wear.
Another common problem involves the manufacturability of known deactivating rocker arm assemblies. Often, the oscillating arm and other components require several machining steps (drilling, milling, grinding, turning etc.) before they can be assembled as a finished product. These additional steps increase the overall cost of the product as well the likelihood of manufacturing defects.
For these reasons, a need exists to provide an improved deactivating roller finger follower or rocker arm assembly that reduces misalignment of the latching components, decreases latch loads and associated wear while being cost effective to manufacture.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a deactivating roller follower assembly for deactivating an associated poppet valve for an internal combustion engine includes a body including a valve end, a pivot end, and a plunger bore. The valve end of the body is configured to contact the associated poppet valve and the pivot end of the body is configured to contact a pivot of the associated internal combustion engine. The assembly further includes a pivotable arm including a hinged end and a free end. The hinged end is rotatably mounted to the valve end of the body. The free end includes a curvilinear engaging surface for transmitting a force required to activate the associated poppet valve. In addition, the assembly includes a plunger including a latching end and a piston end. The plunger is disposed in the plunger bore in the pivot end of the body. The plunger moves between an extended position and a retracted position. The latching end of the plunger selectively engages the free end of the arm to place the arm in a latched state, whereby preventing the arm from moving relative to the body. And, the latching end of the plunger selectively disengages the free end of the arm to place the arm in an unlatched state, whereby permitting the arm to move relative to the body.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating one or more embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
With reference to
With particular reference to
As illustrated in
Whether the arm 116 may pivot is dependent upon the position of the plunger 122. Generally, the plunger 122 moves between a retracted position and an extended position. When the plunger 122 is in the extended position, it will eventually engage an aperture 140 within the arm 116. When the plunger 122 is disposed in the aperture 140, the free end 120 of the arm 116 is no longer permitted to translate in a vertical fashion and the arm is considered to be in a latched state. However, when the plunger is in the retracted position, as shown in
With particular reference to
As shown in
During normal engine operation, the cam lobe C rotates quite rapidly urging the arm 116 in a downward fashion. An arm return spring 152 continuously biases the arm 116 in an upward direction to ensure that the roller bearings 128,130 remain in rolling contact with the cam lobe C when the arm 116 is in the unlatched state. Of course, when the arm 116 is in the unlatched state, the associated poppet valve A is deactivated. Since the free end 120 of the arm 116 cannot react upon a relatively stationary surface (such as the latching end of the plunger) the motion prescribed by the cam profile or lobe C is simply lost into a rotation of the arm 116 about the hinge pin 138. Because the free end 120 of the arm 116 moves rapidly in a vertical direction with respect to the plunger 122, lateral alignment between the latching end 124 of the plunger 122 and the aperture 140 in the arm 116 is important when reactivation of the valve is required. For this reason, the guides 150 are provided to stabilize the arm 116 in at least a lateral direction. In this manner, the guides 150 also ensure proper engagement between the latching end 124 and the aperture 140 when normal oil pressure is restored to the pivot B.
Now with reference to
Despite the similarities, the second embodiment differs from the first embodiment in a number of respects. With reference to
The curvilinear engaging surface 240 can also provide a drip edge for lubricating oil to collect upon while the assembly 200 is operating. This further enhances the likelihood that a lubricating pool of oil will be present during initial engagement between the free end 220 and the latching end 224 of the plunger 222.
Another distinction between the second embodiment and the first embodiment involves the use of a spirally wound torsional spring 252 which generally provides a greater amount of upward torque on the arm 216 as compared to the single layer leaf spring 152 of the first embodiment. Yet another distinction involves a dowel pin 252 that is horizontally oriented across the top surface of the latching end 224 of the plunger 222. The dowel 254 serves as an anti-rotation device to ensure that the upper surface of the latching end 224 is maintained in proper horizontal alignment with the curvilinear engaging surface 240. The dowel pin 254 is confined between the upper surface of the latching end 224 and a recess or cross drilled hole within the body 210. The dowel pin 254 placed in a horizontal orientation (as shown in
With reference to
As with the second embodiment, the piston end 326 of the plunger 322 is received into a first plunger bore 342 and the latching end 324 is received into a second plunger bore 343. A plunger spring 346 reacts against a retainer member 348 to urge the plunger 322 into a forward or extended position within the pivot end 314 of the body 310. As in the second embodiment, a torsion or coil spring 352 biases the arm 316 in an upward position such that it causes the first and second roller bearings 328, 330 to maintain continuous rolling contact with a rotating cam lobe of the internal combustion engine.
A distinction between the third embodiment and the previous embodiments involves the use of an anti-rotation shoulder 354 on the piston end 326 of the plunger 322. The anti-rotation shoulder 354 shown in
With respect to the second and third embodiments of the present invention, it is important to note that from a manufacturing point of view the arm component is much simpler and cost effective to produce than those of other known designs. For one, all of the features required for reliable and efficient operation of the arm can be combined into a single 2-dimensional design. These features are as follows: an aperture for the hinge pin, a reaction notch for the arm spring, an engagement surface for the plunger, an aperture or support for the bearing shaft, an elongated free end portion for preventing the arm from submarining under the plunger during operation, a first stop for preventing the arm from traveling too far downward, a second stop adjacent the valve end of the body for preventing the arm from traveling too far upward, and a first and second side bearing thrust surface. This 2-dimensional profile (which includes a certain prescribed width) is easy to manufacture, allowing it to be completed via simple, cost-effective operations as, for example, by stamping, fine blanking, piercing, powder metal molding, etc.
As to the embodiments described herein, an additional advantage exists in using a dual roller bearing design for the arm as opposed to a single bearing design. In the case of a single bearing design, the bearing is usually disposed centrally within the body or arm and the latching surface is disposed at the free end of the arm just past the outer diameter of the bearing. This has the overall effect of making the deactivating rocker arm assembly longer in length. By using a dual roller bearing design, with one bearing on either side of the arm, the engaging or latching surface can be brought closer towards the valve end of the body or hinged end of the arm. Doing so keeps the overall length of the assembly as short as possible. As such, a deactivating rocker arm or roller finger follower of the present invention can fit into shorter envelopes as compared to the prior art assemblies. One example of where this is beneficial would be in retrofitting engines with deactivating rocker arms. Typically, these engines can not accommodate the longer length or larger prior art deactivating rocker arm assemblies. For this reason, the dual bearing and recessed engaging surface of the present invention is more likely to accommodate these types of engines.
It should be noted that any of the engaging surfaces or anti-rotation techniques, plunger designs, or arm biasing elements discussed herein may be combined in any manner with the embodiments previously discussed. It should also be noted that the engine oil pressure/flow actuating means discussed previously may be used not only for biasing the plunger to a rearward or retracted position, but also for biasing the plunger to a forward or extended position. This could be done by providing a separate oil feed in the rocker pivot that would communicate to an additional feeder port disposed at a rearward portion of the plunger bore. Not only would this eliminate one more component (i.e. the plunger spring) but this would have the added benefit of increasing the forward pressure of the plunger. Increasing the forward pressure of the plunger would help prevent any incidental forces from urging the plunger towards the retracted position and causing the arm to become unlatched.
The exemplary embodiments have been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the exemplary embodiments be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
A claim for domestic priority is made herein under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional App. Ser. No. 60/705,405 filed on Aug. 4, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1343975 | Kothny | Jun 1920 | A |
4768467 | Yamada et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5544626 | Diggs et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5619958 | Hampton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623897 | Hampton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5653198 | Diggs | Aug 1997 | A |
5682848 | Hampton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5960755 | Diggs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6314928 | Baraszu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6604498 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640759 | Hendriksma | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6769392 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6907851 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20030075129 | Spath et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030192494 | Hendriksma | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217728 | Hasebe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070039573 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60705405 | Aug 2005 | US |