1. Field
The invention is related to clamps, and more particularly to dead-end termination clamps suitable for use with cables and collets.
2. Related Art
One of the key challenges in use of dead-end clamps is that they provide support greater than the breaking strength of the cable/wires onto which they are installed. As such, the cables/wires fail before the clamps. Further, special techniques or tools may be required to seat or engage the clamping mechanism of the clamps. In the existing art, for instance, tools are often required to engage the clamping mechanism in conventional clamps. This makes the use of the clamps unnecessarily time consuming and laborious, and introduces variables in installation technique that could lead to pre-mature product failure.
Some of the conventional technology/methodology includes:
Supporting less than or equal to cable strength would be needed to shift the point of failure from the cable/wire to the clamp. Further, engagement of the clamping mechanism should be made without unnecessarily requiring extra force or the use of tools. The current exemplary embodiments provide a means for selecting the support strength and engaging the clamping mechanism without extraneous tools or force.
Exemplary implementations of the present invention address the problems and/or disadvantages of the current technology/methodology described above. Although the present invention is not required to overcome all of the disadvantages described above, an exemplary implementation of the present invention may address the above disadvantages, and further disadvantages not described above, or may not overcome any of the problems listed above while still providing improved methodology and enhancement to the present art.
One embodiment of the present invention utilizes various castings to form the clamp. The clamp includes a clamping end and a connection end. The clamping end includes a clamping mechanism
Other features of the embodiment may include the support strength of the clamp being 80% of the cable strength. Other features of the embodiment may include the support strength of the clamp being 100% of the cable strength. Other features of the embodiment may include the support strength of the clamp being between 80% and 100% of the cable strength.
Other features of the embodiment may include a tongue connection. Other features of the embodiment may include a clevis connection.
Other features of the embodiment may include scaling the castings proportionate to the size of the cable.
Other features of the embodiment may include the use of a chuck for a clamping mechanism. Other features of the embodiment may include the chuck being a collet. Other features of the embodiment may include the collet using one or more helical slots.
Another embodiment of the invention is a collet with a length and at least one helical slot running along the length. Other features of the embodiment may include varying pitch or width of the slot. Other features of the embodiment may include slots which do not run the entire length of the collet.
The following detailed description is provided to assist the reader in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the methods, apparatuses and/or systems described herein. Various changes, modifications, and equivalents of the systems, apparatuses and/or methods described herein will suggest themselves to those of ordinary skill in the art. Descriptions of well-known functions and structures are omitted to enhance clarity and conciseness.
Advantages and benefits of the invention may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. New dead-end clamp design features a cast body which may be scalable to accommodate different size cables or wires.
2. New dead-end clamp design has a support strength of 80% to 100% of a supported cable's breaking strength. This allows for the failure of the clamp before the designed failure of the supported cable.
3. New dead-end clamp design may accommodate tongue or clevis connection styles.
4. New collet design features one or more helical slots along the length of the collet.
5. New collet design features one or more helical slots which may vary in pitch, width, or both along the length of the collet.
6. New collet design reduces and/or removes the requirement for force or tools for enacting the compression and engagement function of the collet.
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/767,000, filed Feb. 20, 2013, in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/017349 | 2/20/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/130646 | 8/28/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1643110 | Briggs | Sep 1927 | A |
2089857 | Robbins | Aug 1937 | A |
2282676 | Pigott | May 1942 | A |
2338822 | Ruggieri | Jan 1944 | A |
2463144 | Buchanan | Mar 1949 | A |
3098275 | Schweitzer | Jul 1963 | A |
3306970 | Kowalski | Feb 1967 | A |
3374511 | Barker | Mar 1968 | A |
3879147 | Morell | Apr 1975 | A |
7607954 | Byrne et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8022301 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
897865 | Nov 1953 | DE |
1536381 | Aug 1968 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/017349 dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
Written Opinion for for PCT/US2014/017349 dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160006230 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61767000 | Feb 2013 | US |