The field of the invention is subterranean debris cleanup tools and more particularly the type of tools that direct debris with flow into the lower end of the tool and retain the debris in a collection volume around an inlet tube and most particularly also employ a swirling movement of the incoming debris laden stream to enhance separation in the tool.
Milling operations at subterranean locations involve fluid circulation that is intended to remove cuttings to the surface. Some of these cuttings do not get transported to the surface and settle out on a wellbore support such as a packer or bridge plug that is below. In open hole situations the wellbore can collapse sending debris into the borehole. Over time sand and other debris can settle out on a borehole support and needs to be removed for access to the support or to allow further subterranean operations.
Wellbore cleanup tools have been used to remove such debris. Different styles have developed over time. In a traditional style the motive fluid goes through the center of the tool and out the bottom to fluidize the debris and send the debris laden stream around the outside of the tool where a diverter redirects flow through the tool body. A receptacle collects the debris as the clean fluid passes through a screen and is discharged above the diverter for the trip to the surface.
Another type of tool has a jet stream going downhole outside the tool to drive debris into the lower end of the tool where debris is collected and clean fluid that passes through a screen is returned to the surface outside the tool through ports located near the downhole oriented jet outlets. The jet outlets act as an eductor for pulling in debris laden flow into the lower end of the tool. Some examples of such tools are U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,176,311; 6,607,031; 7,779,901; 7,610,957; 7,472,745; 6,276,452; 5,123,489. Debris catchers with a circulation pattern that takes debris up on the outside of the tool body and routes it into the tool with a diverter are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,924,940; 6,189,617; 6,250,387 and 7,478,687.
The use of centrifugal force to separate components of different densities is illustrated in a product sold by Cavins of Houston, Tex. under the name Sandtrap Downhole Desander for use with electric submersible pump suction lines. U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,430 illustrates the use of a hydro-cyclone on a wellhead. Also relevant to the subterranean debris removal field is SPE 96440; P. Connel and D. B. Houghton; Removal of Debris from Deep Water Wellbore Using Vectored Annulus Cleaning System Reduces Problems and Saves Rig Time. Also relevant to the field of subterranean debris removal are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,276,931 and 6,978,841.
Current designs of debris removal devices that take in the debris with fluid reverse circulating into the lower end of the tool housing have used a straight shot for the inlet tube coupled with a deflector at the top that can be a cone shape 10 as in
The present invention seeks to enhance the separation effect and do so in a smaller space and in a manner that can advantageously use higher velocities to enhance the separation. This is principally accomplished by inducing a swirl to the incoming debris laden fluid stream. The inlet tube can have spiral grooves or internal protrusions that impart the spiral pattern to the fluid stream so that the solids by centrifugal force are hurled to the outer periphery on the way to the outlet of the housing and the downstream screen. These and other aspects of the present invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while understanding that the full scope of the invention is to be determined from the appended claims.
A subterranean debris catcher swirls the incoming debris laden stream by putting grooves or spiral projections on the inside of the inlet pipe. In some embodiments the solids come out of openings in the side of the inlet pipe and in others the solids can exit near the top either directly into the enclosed solids holding volume as the liquid exits straight out or the solids can be discharged out the end of the inlet pipe into the bigger open space defined by the housing. In the latter case the inside housing wall can have a screen or vanes that slow down the solid particles as the fluid continues to a housing exit and eventually to an exit screen before being discharged to either go to the surface or recirculate back along the outside of the tool to the inlet pipe while picking up additional debris.
Other options to induce the swirling movement in the inlet tube of the various embodiments is to put a spiral groove or projection 128 shown in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/026,355 filed on Sep. 13, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/880,906 filed on Sep. 13, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,584,744 issued on Nov. 19, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2169922 | Notley | Aug 1939 | A |
2171539 | Burns | Sep 1939 | A |
2556849 | Nolley | Jun 1951 | A |
3023810 | Anderson | Mar 1962 | A |
3094175 | Jackson | Jun 1963 | A |
3895930 | Campolong | Jul 1975 | A |
4276931 | Murray | Jul 1981 | A |
4543019 | Shikata | Sep 1985 | A |
4828036 | Simmons | May 1989 | A |
4857175 | Spinnler | Aug 1989 | A |
4924940 | Burroughs et al. | May 1990 | A |
5123489 | Davis et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139095 | Lyon | Aug 1992 | A |
5295537 | Trainer | Mar 1994 | A |
5490571 | Hanns | Feb 1996 | A |
5662167 | Patterson | Sep 1997 | A |
6176311 | Ryan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189617 | Sorhus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6250387 | Carmichael et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276452 | Davis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6341653 | Firmaniuk | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6607031 | Lynde et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6695058 | French | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6978841 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7096946 | Jasser et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
RE39292 | Latos | Sep 2006 | E |
7472745 | Lynde et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478687 | Lynde et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7610957 | Davis | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635430 | Mildren et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7779901 | Davis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7861772 | Blair | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8056622 | Lynde | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8109331 | Lynde | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8136587 | Lynde | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8257585 | Davis | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8360153 | Ford | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8474522 | Lynde | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8584744 | Soni | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8844619 | Soni | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8960282 | Zhu | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20020053428 | Maples | May 2002 | A1 |
20090142594 | Humphreys | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200012 | Davis | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090301710 | Clem et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100243258 | Fishbeck | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258296 | Lynde | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258297 | Lynde | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258298 | Lynde | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100288485 | Blair | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110024112 | Ford | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024119 | Wolf | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120061073 | Soni | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120118576 | Telfer | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152522 | Lynde | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120273278 | Zhu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130168091 | Xu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150000896 | Soni | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2669464 | Dec 2013 | EP |
WO 0058602 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Connell, P., et al., “Removal of Debris from Deepwater Wellbores Using Vectored Annulus Cleaning System Reduces Problems and Saves Rig Time”, SPE 96440, Oct. 2005, 1-6. |
Drilling Practices Manual, Drilling Fluid Solids Removal, Preston More, 170, undated. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150000896 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14026355 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14487979 | US | |
Parent | 12880906 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14026355 | US |