Decanter centrifuges rely on centrifugal acceleration to continuously separate solid materials from liquids in a slurry. Decanter centrifuges can enhance the settling rate (and therefore improve separation) by keeping solids at increased centrifugal forces for longer durations. Settling rate in a decanter centrifuge may be a function of retention time, spinning speed, pool depth, and differential density. By accelerating the fluid more rapidly, solids may settle out faster.
A typical decanter centrifuge includes a rotating centrifuge bowl, a conical beach at a tapered end of the bowl, a nozzle where a slurry is discharged into the bowl from an internal feed chamber, a screw conveyor to convey separated solids to a solids discharge, and a liquids discharge. In a typical decanter centrifuge, the solids form a bowl wall cake along inside surfaces of the centrifuge bowl. As slurry is accelerated and discharged into the bowl, it can strike the wall cake, which may unevenly disturb the wall cake and result in unbalanced weight distribution within the bowl. A non-homogeneous wall cake could lead to undesirable vibration of the decanter centrifuge, thereby reducing performance and/or increasing wear on the machinery.
The present disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the drawings. Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various embodiments of the present disclosure. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present disclosure.
In the following description, reference is made to exemplary embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the concepts disclosed herein, and it is to be understood that modifications to the various disclosed embodiments may be made, and other embodiments may be utilized, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “one example,” or “an example” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” “one example,” or “an example” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable combinations and/or sub-combinations in one or more embodiments or examples.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include a decanter centrifuge having one or more nozzles adapted to discharge a slurry from a centrifuge feed chamber into a separation zone within a centrifuge bowl. According to various embodiments, such discharge may have a shorter spiral through the separation zone compared to that of traditional discharge nozzles, which may lead to reduced disturbance of bowl wall cake. As a result, embodiments of the present disclosure may lead to reduced bowl wear, reduced vibration of the centrifuge, and improved solid cut point. According to various embodiments, tangential discharge of slurry from the nozzles into the centrifuge bowl may be associated with higher slurry exit velocity.
Referring to
In various embodiments, feed chamber 110 and centrifuge bowl 210 are adapted to rotate independently from each other within the base frame and the housing, such that feed chamber 110 and centrifuge bowl 210 may be driven at respectively different rotational speeds. In some embodiments, feed chamber 110 rotates at greater speeds than that of centrifuge bowl 210. In other embodiments, feed chamber 110 rotates at lesser speeds than that of centrifuge bowl 210.
In some embodiments, centrifuge bowl 210 is rotationally fixed to a base frame and/or centrifuge housing, such that it remains stationary while feed chamber 110 may rotate within the centrifuge bowl 210. In one embodiment, feed chamber 110 and centrifuge bowl 210 are rotationally fixed to each other and rotate at the same time and at the same speed.
Feed chamber 110 defines an interior volume 112 formed by outer annular walls. 114 Embodiments of feed chamber 110 comprise a cylindrical section 120 and a frustoconical section 130, the cylindrical section 120 and frustoconical section 130 being defined by respective sections of outer annular wall 114 of the feed chamber 110. A slurry (not shown) to be separated may be fed to feed chamber 110 via feed tube 115. The slurry may then be discharged into the separation zone 215 of centrifuge bowl 210 via nozzles 125.
One or more nozzles 125 placed on cylindrical section 120 provide fluid communication from the interior volume 112 of feed chamber 110 to the annular volume between feed chamber 110 and centrifuge bowl 210.
Embodiments of decanter centrifuge 100 comprise a scroll conveyor 140 coaxially aligned within centrifuge bowl 210 around the circumference of feed chamber 110. In one embodiment, scroll conveyor 140 flights are fixed to the exterior walls 114 of feed chamber 110 and thus rotate in synchronization with feed chamber 110. In another embodiment, scroll conveyor 140 is adapted to rotate independently from feed chamber 110.
According to embodiments, feed chamber 110 is supported on, and rotated by, feed trunnion 150 and gear trunnion 155. Feed trunnion 150 houses a portion of feed tube 115. In the embodiment depicted, gear trunnion 155 applies rotational force to rotate the feed chamber 110 relative to centrifuge bowl 210 in the direction indicated in
In various embodiments, a drive motor (not shown) is adapted to apply rotation to rotating elements of decanter centrifuge 100. In embodiments, the drive motor drives the rotation directly. In other embodiments, drive motor applies rotation via a drive belt, drive gears, a drive pully, via other mechanisms, or combinations thereof.
Embodiments of centrifuge bowl 210 comprise a cylindrical section 220 and a frustoconical section 230, which respectively encircle cylindrical section 120 and frustoconical section 130 of feed chamber 110. The inner inclined surfaces of the frustoconical section 230 may be known in the art as the “beach” of centrifuge bowl 210.
According to embodiments, centrifuge bowl 210 is adapted to rotate in a clockwise direction (looking at centrifuge bowl 210 along its axis from its end opposite frustoconical section 230). As stated above, scroll conveyor 140 can rotate, relative to centrifuge bowl 210, in a direction indicated by arrow 157. Arrow 157 indicates a counterclockwise direction (looking at feed chamber 110 along its axis from its end opposite frustoconical section 130). As a first example, this means that scroll conveyor 140 may be rotating in the same absolute direction as, but at a slower absolute rotational speed than, centrifuge bowl 210. As a second example, this also means that scroll conveyor 140 may be rotating in an absolute direction opposite to the rotational direction of centrifuge bowl 210. In the first example, the rotational speed of scroll conveyor 140 relative to centrifuge bowl 210 is slower than that of the second example.
As would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, a higher rotational speed difference between scroll conveyor 140 and centrifuge bowl 210 may result in a shorter stay time for solids within centrifuge bowl 210. In contrast, a lower rotational speed difference between scroll conveyor 140 and centrifuge bowl 210 may result in a longer stay time for solids within centrifuge bowl 210.
Referring to
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, multiple nozzles 125 may be thus positioned, the arrangement thereof forming a helical pattern around and along the feed chamber 110 exterior wall 114. In one embodiment, each nozzle 125 is positioned approximately ninety degrees apart from each other along the feed chamber 110 exterior wall 114. In other embodiments, nozzles 125 are positioned closer together to each other. In other embodiments, nozzles 125 are positioned farther from each other. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, nozzles 125 are also placed around frustoconical section 130 of feed chamber 110.
As
Various embodiments of the present disclosure may include any quantity of nozzles 125 as may be appropriate. For example, one embodiment comprises twelve nozzles 125, roughly equally spaced around cylindrical section 120 of feed chamber 110. In other embodiments, other quantities of nozzles 125 are included.
According to various embodiments, decanter centrifuge 100 operates to separate a concentrated heavy phase from a clarified liquid in the separation zone and separately discharge the separated phases. Slurry to be separated by decanter centrifuge 100 enters feed chamber 110 via feed tube 115. The slurry is then forced out of the feed chamber 110, through one or more nozzles 125, into the separation zone 215 (depicted in
Referring back to
As the heavy and light phases are moved toward their respective discharge ports 160, 165, additional unseparated slurry continually enters the separation zone through nozzles 125. Separated phases may be conveyed away from discharge ports 160, 165 and out of the decanter centrifuge as the phases are discharged therefrom. In some embodiments, more than two phases are separated from each other. Each separated phase may have one or more discharge ports where it may be discharged.
Referring now to
As depicted in
In embodiments of the present disclosure, leading edge 420 is rounded along the length of leading edge 420 with a curvature that extends from the outer surface of nozzle 125 depicted in
In contrast, some embodiments of trailing edge 430 comprise an edge with an acute angle. Other embodiments comprise a curve having a relatively small radius. In various embodiments, trailing edge 430 has less curvature relative to leading edge 420. In one embodiment, the radius of curvature of trailing edge 430 is less than one-third of that of leading edge 420. In another embodiment, the radius of curvature of trailing edge 430 is less than one-fourth of that of leading edge 420. In another embodiment, the radius of curvature of trailing edge 430 is less than one-fifth of that of leading edge 420.
As shown in
As set forth above and as depicted in
As feed chamber 110 rotates while filled with slurry, leading edge 525 may catch small amounts of sand, rocks, sediment, or other slurry particulate matter, thereby precipitating a small dam of such slurry matter. It is theorized that such a dam may result in lower wear rate of the nozzle 125, leading to longer service life.
It is also understood that nozzles 125 may exhibit a longer service life than prior art devices because nozzles 125 comprise a larger leading area, such as leading edge 525, where potentially damaging contact with slurry particles may be distributed. In comparison, prior art nozzles, some of which are round, may tend to result in particles being concentrated on relatively small leading areas, leading to faster wear and shorter service life.
In putting embodiments of the present disclosure into practice, it was found that nozzles 125 as disclosed herein may have approximately double the service life of some prior art nozzles. In particular, some prior art nozzles had a service life of approximately three to six months, whereas one nozzle according to embodiments of the present disclosure was tested for one year under similar conditions without failing.
It was found that embodiments according to the present disclosure may provide the benefit of less accumulation of slurry within feed chamber 110. This benefit may be the result of increased fluid flow rates through nozzles 125 out of feed chamber 110.
As shown in
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a line from leading edge 420 to trailing edge 430 of each nozzle 125 would be approximately tangential to the outer annular walls of feed chamber 110, or approximately parallel to a line that is tangential to the outer annular walls of feed chamber 110. As used herein, the terms “tangential” and “tangentially” refer to imaginary lines that are defined as approximately tangential to the outer annular walls of feed chamber 110 at cylindrical section 120. The tangential direction may also be perpendicular to the axis of rotation of feed chamber 110.
As used herein, the terms “lateral” and “laterally” refer to imaginary curves that extend around the outer surfaces of the annular walls of cylindrical section 120 of feed chamber 110 and that are coplanar with tangential lines of cylindrical section 120 of feed chamber 110. As used herein, the terms “axial” and “axially” refer to imaginary lines that are approximately parallel to the axis of rotation of feed chamber 110. As used herein, the terms “longitudinal” and “longitudinally” refer to imaginary lines that extend along the length of the outer surfaces of the annular walls of cylindrical section 120 of feed chamber 110 and that are approximately parallel to axial lines.
As further shown in
The shallow incline of surface 530, possibly in conjunction with other features of nozzle 125, may result in discharge flow from nozzle 125 that is more tangential than provided by prior art nozzles. It is understood that the relatively shallow incline of surface 530 may result in reduced shear of the slurry passing through nozzle 125 in comparison to prior art nozzles, which reduction may cause, at least in part, the slurry to flow in a more tangential direction as the slurry discharges from nozzles 125.
A computational fluid dynamic (“CFD”) analysis was performed to simulate and analyze slurry discharge flow through nozzles 125 during operation of decanter centrifuge 100. In the CFD analysis, a flow pattern was developed in such way that slurry discharged from nozzles 125 in a direction approximately tangential, or near tangential, to the outer annular walls of feed chamber 110. According to various embodiments of the present disclosure, such tangential discharge may create a shorter spiral of slurry flow inside centrifuge bowl 210. A shorter spiral may be less likely to disturb wall cake on the interior surfaces of centrifuge bowl 210 and hence may maintain a more homogeneous and/or evenly distributed wall cake throughout centrifuge bowl 210. As a result, mass balance may be maintained in the rotating assembly, which can reduce vibration and improve wear rate.
Additionally, it is understood that the wall cake may act as a protective layer for interior surfaces of centrifuge bowl 210, thereby reducing wear of centrifuge bowl 210. A shorter spiral of slurry discharge within centrifuge bowl 210 may increase the velocity of the slurry inside centrifuge bowl 210, which can lead to better separation of solids and improved separation cut point.
Although the present disclosure is described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, given the benefit of this disclosure, including embodiments that do not provide all of the benefits and features set forth herein, which are also within the scope of this disclosure. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3228592 | Shapiro | Jan 1966 | A |
3398888 | Koenecke | Aug 1968 | A |
3368747 | Lavanchy et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3568919 | Nielsen | Mar 1971 | A |
3620442 | Halloran, Jr. | Nov 1971 | A |
4323190 | Bessette | Apr 1982 | A |
5380434 | Paschedag | Jan 1995 | A |
5971907 | Johannemann | Oct 1999 | A |
6024686 | Madsen | Feb 2000 | A |
6605029 | Koch | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6780147 | Koch | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790169 | Koch | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7247133 | Gronnegaard | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7374529 | Hensley | May 2008 | B2 |
9333515 | Reiff | May 2016 | B2 |
9393574 | Morris | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9931643 | Huyghe | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20060240966 | Lantz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20230149950 | Maxwell | May 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202823651 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103447167 | Dec 2013 | CN |
10-2512923 | Mar 2023 | KR |
03076078 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2012089824 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Nov. 18, 2021, issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. EP-21180834.0 (10 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210394203 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |