1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an improved construction for deck connectors. The connectors of this invention basically comprise a metal piece that is cast into the edge of a concrete slab or tee, and a void is provided and defined by a box disposed behind the connector in the slab and communicating with a slot formed through the face of the connector. A plate dowel is movably disposed within the box, through the slot formed in the connector whereby adjacent concrete structural members may be joined by welding opposed plate dowels.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the construction industry the use of flange connectors for the purpose of connecting adjacent concrete slabs and wall panels is certainly well-known. One early example of such prior art devices is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 3,958,954, to Ehlenbeck. According to the teaching of that patent, the connector is embedded along the edges of concrete members, and is formed of sheet metal that includes an elongated central portion which is exposed for the purpose of welding adjacent connectors on opposed panels.
Yet another form of such a connector is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,616, to Klein. Still another teaching in the patent literature is provided by U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,897, to Johnson, et al. All three of the prior art devices identified in the above patents provide a substantially flat metal surface exposed on the edge of the concrete element and a pair of angularly-extending legs into the concrete element, those legs extending back into the concrete from the exposed planar weldment face. The actual connection between adjacent slabs and connectors is performed by either welding the exposed faces to each other, or, more commonly, inserting a bar or slug between the faces and accomplishing the welding connection.
The prior art also teaches that the use of plate dowels between such concrete structures may be advantageous in that such plate dowels may be inserted into a pocket so that the slabs may move horizontally to minimize the size and number of restraint cracks. However, the prior art neither discloses nor suggests any structure whereby the utility of a plate dowel may be combined with state-of-the-art connectors.
It is therefore clear that an improved deck connector, suitable for use in combination with a form of plate dowel, would represent a significant improvement in the construction of various structures utilizing precast/prestressed slabs and wall panels. Of course, for purposes of economy and utility, any such improved connector must be suitable for installation as the slabs are formed and easily accessible as the structure is erected. For purposes of safety, the connections formed using the improved connector must satisfy all applicable codes and standards.
The present invention relates to an improved deck connector of the type used in the construction industry for joining adjacent concrete structures in an edge-to-edge or edge-to-vertical relationship. The improved connector basically comprises a bent metal anchor that is embedded into the concrete structural element as it is formed. The connector further comprises a plastic box or housing that receives a metal weld plate, preferably having a pull tab attached thereto. The invention further comprises a void former that is held over the exposed surface of the metal connector as the concrete element is formed. The void former is preferably held in place by magnets and is removed for use, as more fully set forth hereinafter.
The invention accordingly comprises the features of construction, combination of elements, and arrangement of part which will be exemplified in the construction hereinafter set forth, and the scope of the invention will be indicated in the claims.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Similar reference characters refer to similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
A preferred embodiment for the improved deck connector of this invention is shown in drawing
Attention is first invited to the view of
Both the angular orientation of legs 22-28 and the wave-like bending of each of those legs significantly enhance the security of anchoring device 10 within the concrete slab. Additional security of anchoring device 10 within the concrete may be accomplished by the insertion of reinforcing bars 32 through opposed leg apertures 30 in the upper legs 22 and 24, and the opposed leg apertures 30 in each of the lower legs 26 and 28. However, the use of reinforcing bars 32 is considered optional.
The plastic box or housing 12 is also shown in the view of
Movably mounted within box 12 is weld plate 14. As clearly seen in the view of
The provision of the ridges 42 on the interior of box 12 serves as guides or runners for weld plate 14. The substantially T-shape of weld plate 14 prevents its removal from anchoring device 10, while still permitting adjustment of its position with respect to an adjacent anchoring device 10 in a second concrete structure to which attachment is desired. The beveled structure defined by front edge 48 of weld plate 14 further enhances the ease with which a connection can be made. It is to be understood that a welding slug or bar is not required, but may be used. It is also to be understood that, for purposes of economy, the opposed anchoring device in the second concrete structure may be constructed to define a continuous front face, having no rectangular opening 20, no box or housing 12, and no weld plate 14. That second device would, however, include upper legs 22 and 24 and lower legs 26 and 28 as described above. If such a modified anchoring device were used, in the second concrete structure, weld plate 14 as described above could be welded directly to the modified front face of the modified anchoring device.
While the preferred method of connecting adjacent anchoring devices is by welding opposed weld plates 14 as described above, or by welding weld plate 14 to the modified face of the modified anchoring device, other means for accomplishing the connection are also contemplated. For example, the front edge of opposed weld plates may be modified to define correspondingly opposed relieved portions, or steps such that opposed modified weld plates would actually overlap each other when withdrawn from their respective boxes 12 for attachment. Physical attachment could then be accomplished by welding, or even by the placement of bolts through apertures formed in the opposed ledges.
Referring once again to the view of
According to known forming techniques, it is necessary to “protect” what will be the exposed front face 18 of anchoring device 10 as the concrete is poured and allowed to set. This “protection” is accomplished by the use of void former 16. Referring to the view of
Clearly, then, the improved deck connector of this invention represents a significant advance over the current state of the art. The structure of metal anchoring device 10 enhances the “capture” of the connector within the concrete structure, particularly if reinforcing bars 32 are utilized. Box or housing 12 into which the weld plate 14 is mounted is easily assembled because of its two-part, snap-together structure, and the shape of weld plate 14 literally eliminates the possibility of the plate being lost by falling out during transportation or installation. Furthermore, because weld plate 14 is free to move on the ridges 42 formed within box 12, the connector of this invention is suitable for use across joints of from about zero (0) to about 1.5 inches in width. Even once the connection has been made, weld plate 14 may still “move” to accommodate expansion and contraction of the joined structure without transferring stress to the concrete. Finally, because the weld plate 14 does not come into contact with either surrounding concrete or anchoring device 10, heat resulting from the welding operation more easily dissipates and is not directly transferred to the structure. This significantly reduces the likelihood of cracking or splintering during the connection process. While it may be viewed as relatively minor, the addition of the removable pull tab 50 to weld plate 14 significantly enhances the ease with which the weld plate 14 may be withdrawn for connection. Finally, the utility of the improved deck connector of this invention is enhanced by the fact that anchoring device 10 may be formed using known cutting and stamping techniques from flat stock and that box or housing 12 may be formed with extreme economy by plastic molding.
It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
Now that the invention has been described,
Applicants claim the benefit of their prior Provisional Application, Ser. No. 60/727,175, filed Oct. 14, 2005, and titled IMPROVED DECK CONNECTOR.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
668366 | Wight | Feb 1901 | A |
1199077 | James | Sep 1916 | A |
1280485 | Kahn | Oct 1918 | A |
1659326 | Meyercord | Feb 1928 | A |
2110863 | Barnett | Mar 1938 | A |
2621378 | Wilson | Dec 1952 | A |
3460860 | Stevens, Jr. | Aug 1969 | A |
3563582 | Shroyer et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3958954 | Ehlenbeck | May 1976 | A |
3993341 | Bentley | Nov 1976 | A |
4123882 | Case et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4145152 | Waugh | Mar 1979 | A |
4445303 | Judkins | May 1984 | A |
4724649 | Lowndes, III | Feb 1988 | A |
5222338 | Hull et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5307603 | Chiodo | May 1994 | A |
5402616 | Klein | Apr 1995 | A |
5618125 | McPhee | Apr 1997 | A |
5623804 | Kelly et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5651911 | Pennypacker | Jul 1997 | A |
5890340 | Kafarowski | Apr 1999 | A |
5971662 | Becker | Oct 1999 | A |
6145262 | Schrader et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185897 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6298619 | Davie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354760 | Boxall et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389772 | Gleckman et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6460824 | Lancelot et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6645342 | Scott | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647674 | Lancelot, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668506 | Snauwaert | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681538 | Sarkisian | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6755385 | Lancelot, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761007 | Lancelot, III et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764249 | Stone | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6810633 | Harris, Sr. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854232 | Snauwaert | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7124550 | Deming | Oct 2006 | B1 |
20020096619 | Lancelot et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020192018 | Snauwaert | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033778 | Boxall et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030101678 | Snauwaert | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110728 | Pacione et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140590 | Lancelot et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040010985 | Francies, III et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070056242 | Sample | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070231068 | Francies et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60727175 | Oct 2005 | US |