This application claims priority to German Utility Model Application DE 202005020308.4 filed Dec. 27, 2006.
So-called decompression locks are required in order to achieve a rapid compensation of pressure in case of a sudden increase in pressure in one of two areas.
The function of a decompression lock is explained by means of the following example (
Two areas (an upper area O and a lower area U) are separated from one another by a wall W which is pressure-tight. A pressure-tight cover C is located releasably on a hatch in wall W.
The same pressure normally prevails in the two areas O and U. Should the pressure in the lower area U increase (when a-certain pressure is reached), the hatch cover C is “thrown” (pressed) in direction P into the upper area O, so that a rapid compensation of pressure can take place through the hatch which is no longer closed.
The hatch cover C is held in place at each of its edges by a swivelling locking latch L, located on a support carriage Z of the decompression lock X. The decompression locks X are attached to the wall at the edges of the hatch. When the, rise in pressure in the lower area U presses the hatch cover C in direction +P against the swivelling locking latch L, a leaf spring (not shown) which holds the latch is released from its engaged position and the swivelling locking latch L swivels in the direction +R around the axle A. The upper edge E of the hatch cover C then presses against the bevel S of the swivelling locking latch L and pushes the support carriage Z of the decompression lock X temporarily sideways in direction −D against the force of a spiral spring (not shown). This clears the way for the hatch cover C into the upper area O.
The released hatch cover C (marked with dashes) can be returned to a position closing the hatch by pressing its lower edge V against the upper bevel T of the swivelling locking latch L.
This causes the swivelling locking latch to swivel in the direction contrary to −R until the leaf spring again reaches its engaged position. During this movement, the support carriage yields temporarily sideways in direction −D (against the force of the spiral spring).
As soon as the hatch cover reaches a position which closes the hatch, the spiral spring presses the support carriage back in a direction contrary to −D, whereby the outer end of the swivelling locking latch L returns to a closed position above the hatch cover.
This method of function of the decompression lock applies both to the decompression lock according to prior art in EP 0784141 mentioned below and to the decompression lock according to invention.
By means of a combination of two decompression locks acting contrary to one another (see
To this end, the combined decompression locks are attached to a (sealing) frame F′ which is located at the edges of the hatch. The “outer” swivelling locking latch L″ of one of the decompression locks X″ projects onto the top side of wall (W′). The “inner” swivelling locking latch L′ of the other decompression lock X′ projects onto the top side of the hatch cover (C′).
When the pressure rises in the lower area U′, the inner latches L′ open and the hatch cover C′ is “thrown” (pressed) into the upper area O′.
When the pressure rises in the upper area O′, the outer latches L″ open and the hatch cover C′ and frame F′ are pressed into the lower area U′.
From European Patent EP 0784 141 a decompression lock is known which has a longitudinally displaceable support carriage on which a locking latch is rotatably arranged. Both the support carriage and the locking latch are subjected to the pressure of a compression spring forcing both parts into the closed position.
The compression spring is located in a trough in a base plate beneath the support carriage. A detent spring is attached to the support carriage. Its outer end holds the locking bolt in the closed position. Its inner end enters the trough and abuts the end of the compression spring in such a way as to create a connection between the compression spring and the support carriage.
This European Patent EP 0784 141 also describes a structural unit with two decompression locks adjacent to one another which act in opposite directions.
The purpose of the invention is to provide an improved decompression lock or an improved structural unit with two adjacent decompression locks acting in opposite directions.
This purpose is fulfilled by the characteristics described in claims 1 and 8.
Further advantageous modifications are described in the sub-claims.
The improvements refer to a reduction in weight, simplified installation, a lower number of constituent parts and therefore a reduction in cost.
Adaptations of the invention are shown in the drawings and are described in more detail below.
This decompression lock consists of a support carriage 3 and a base part 4.
The support carriage 3 moves back and forward in straight grooves 5 (of which only one groove is seen in
The support carriage 3 consists mainly of two side walls 3-1 and 3-2 and a transverse plate 3-3 connecting these in its lower area. The swivelling locking latch 2 and the leaf spring 1 are arranged on the support carriage. The swivelling locking latch 2 is mounted rotatably on an axle A located between the side walls 3-1 and 3-2. The end of the swivelling locking latch 2 pointing outwards has a sliding bevel S, along which, as explained with reference to
At the other end of the swivelling locking latch (see also
The purpose of the leaf spring is to hold the swivelling locking latch 2 in the closed position by engagement of its end 1-3 in the notch K.
A compression spring 6 is located in a recess 7 in the base plate 4 beneath the support carriage 3. The purpose of the compression spring 6 is to press the support carriage 3 (in direction −D according to
The method of function of this decompression lock is described below with reference to
In the closed position, the end of the swivelling locking latch 2 projects over the edge of the hatch cover. When the pressure in the lower area U rises above a certain point, the hatch cover C yields upwards in direction +P. In doing so, its top edge E presses against the slide bevel S of the swivelling locking latch 2. This then executes a swivelling movement around its own axle A in direction +R which causes the leaf spring 1 to disengage from the notch K. The pressure of edge E on the sliding bevel S causes the support carriage 3 to move in direction −D against the force of the compression spring 6. This causes the outer end of the swivelling locking latch 2, which previously projected over the hatch cover C, to retract, thereby clearing the way. The hatch cover C can now yield into the upper area O without obstruction. The hatch is no longer closed, thereby permitting rapid compensation of pressure between the upper area O and the lower area U.
From part 3-1′ of the support carriage, spacing elements d1, d2 and d3 extend for the connection of both parts of the support carriage. To join the two parts of the support carriage with one another and prevent them from twisting, the free ends e1, e2 and 23 of these spacing elements are located in recesses in the wall of support carriage part 3-2′. Between the free ends and the remaining part of the spacing elements there is a shoulder st1, st2 and st3 which rests against the inner wall of part 3-2′ of the support carriage in the assembled state. Spacer element d1 also forms the axle for the swivelling locking latch 2′.
The two decompression locks 10 and 20 (whose design corresponds, with one exception, to the single decompression lock shown in
The outer end 12e of the swivelling locking latch 12 of the decompression lock 10 and the outer end 22e of the swivelling locking latch 22 of the other decompression lock 20 point in offset opposite directions +F and +G.
The support carriage guides of both decompression locks are parallel to one another. The groove guides for decompression lock 10 are marked with number 13.
Between the support carriages 11 and 21 of the two decompression locks 10 and 20 there is a common spiral spring 31 forcing both support carriages to move in directions +F and +G.
The support carriage 11 is pressed by this spring 31 in direction +F and support carriage 21 in direction +G into an end position. The end position of support carriage 11 is defined by the stop 32 (
In the end position, the swivelling locking latch 12 and 21 is in the locked position when the corresponding leaf spring 14 and 24 engages in its stop notch K (see also
The spiral spring 31 common to both decompression locks 10 and 20 is located between the sides of support carriages 11 and 21 facing one another. One stop each is provided for its front end 31a and rear end 31b.
The stop for the front end 31a is formed as a projection 23 on the side of the support carriage 21. The stop for the rear end 31b (not seen in
Lateral yielding by the spiral spring is prevented
a) by tappets extending from the stops 23 etc. into the interior of the spring ends, and/or
b) by projections 15, 25 located on the sides of the support carriage facing one another, and/or
c) by a spring bed 32 located between the support carriages.
The single decompression lock according to invention is suitable for opening a hatch cover in one direction only, which may also be attached by hinges.
The structural unit according to invention with two decompression locks adjacent to one another and acting in opposite directions is however suitable for locking a hatch cover which can open in two opposite directions. No hinges are required here. An application of this kind making use of a (sealing) frame is already known to prior art (EP 0784141).
Decompression locks are used where different pressures in two separate areas have to be compensated rapidly, particularly in aircraft construction. Since very high demands are made on the resistance of components to heat in aircraft construction, decompression locks of this kind are made of metal, preferably of aluminium (die castings), with the exception of the springs, for which spring steel is used in any case. For decompression locks of this kind the two-part design is particularly advantageous since they allow simpler installation. Where the heat-resistance requirements are less demanding, the decompression locks can also be made of plastic.
The use of plastic (especially with the single-part design) makes it possible to form spring tappets (p2 in
The metal skeleton is more resistant to heat than the plastic. The metal skeleton B* is formed in such a way that the functions of the swivelling locking latch i.e. its ability to swivel around the axle A*, to apply force to the slide bevels S*, T*, and to engage in position K* by means of the leaf spring, are maintained after destruction of the plastic by heat, e.g. as the result of a fire.
The metal skeleton B* includes two flat wall elements B-1*, B-2* arranged parallel to one another, which are connected with one another by a bridge ST* and which have holes BH1*, BH2* aligned with one another to receive the swivelling axle A*. The edge surfaces F1*, F2*, F3*, F4*, F5*, F6* of the wall elements lie on the surface of the slide-bevel area or on the surface of the area of the engagement point. These edge surfaces form a smooth surface with the adjacent plastic edge surfaces. These edge surfaces can also be coated thinly with plastic. In case of requirements with regard to heat resistance, the thickness of the coat must be such that the swivelling function of the swivelling locking latch is not impaired following destruction of the plastic by heat.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2005 020 308 U | Dec 2005 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
309181 | Woodrich | Dec 1884 | A |
1093637 | Lint | Apr 1914 | A |
3571977 | Abeel | Mar 1971 | A |
5217339 | O'Connor | Jun 1993 | A |
5426905 | Rollhauser | Jun 1995 | A |
5782511 | Schwarz | Jul 1998 | A |
6149210 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6409446 | Schwarz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6443679 | Schwarz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6497436 | DeBlock et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6837661 | Schwarz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866227 | Pratt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7107697 | Schwarz et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7179039 | Schwarz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20040115030 | Schwarz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040240933 | Schwarz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070147975 | Homner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1860948 | Oct 1962 | DE |
3145155 | Nov 1981 | DE |
8710288 | Oct 1987 | DE |
3623311 | Jan 1988 | DE |
3922025 | Sep 1990 | DE |
4239908 | Mar 1994 | DE |
19707634 | Oct 1997 | DE |
29808914 | Sep 1998 | DE |
10040410 | Jan 2001 | DE |
199430383 | Dec 2001 | DE |
20218302 | Mar 2003 | DE |
10355780 | Jun 2005 | DE |
102004011183 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102006008655 | Sep 2006 | DE |
202006019165.8 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007000112.6 | Aug 2007 | DE |
0189569 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0784141 | Jul 1997 | EP |
06026133 | Mar 2007 | EP |
07004742 | May 2007 | EP |
1268022 | Mar 1972 | GB |
1506902 | Apr 1978 | GB |
2050487 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2219342 | Dec 1989 | GB |
2000310210 | Jul 2000 | JP |
8000162 | Feb 1980 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070158955 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |