1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to decontamination and/or cleaning, and more specifically to decontamination and/or cleaning of fragile materials, for example certain historic artifacts.
2. Background Information
Decontamination and/or cleaning of materials typically involves the application of a solvent along with substantial mechanical energy, for example, mechanical energy in the form of shear caused by a high pressure spray, a stirred or ultrasonic bath, mechanical scrubbing, or other techniques. The application of mechanical energy generally causes the removal of contaminates by convective mass transfer.
However, many conventional decontamination and/or cleaning techniques are unsuited for cleaning fragile materials, for example, delicate historic artifacts such as textiles, skins, papers, and other frail items. These types of historic artifacts are often mechanically fragile, and thus respond adversely to high pressure spraying, stirred or ultrasonic baths, mechanical scrubbing and other aggressive techniques. Similarly, such historic artifacts are often incompatible with many solvents, as the solvents may remove, in addition to the undesired contaminates, desired pigments, dyes, inks, paints, stains, and/or other types of substances present on the artifact. Due to the typically high monetary and cultural value of historic artifacts, even very minor damage due to decontamination and/or cleaning is generally deemed unacceptable.
Yet the need to decontaminate and/or clean fragile materials, such as delicate historic artifacts, still exists despite the challenges the process presents. In addition to cleaning rather innocuous contaminates from artifacts for largely aesthetic reasons, decontamination and/or cleaning may be needed to remove toxic contaminates that are potentially harmful to people handling the artifacts. Some historic artifacts are contaminated from the environment in which they were discovered or historically maintained. More often, historic artifacts have been unintentionally contaminated by museum personnel or others, who applied toxic chemicals to the artifacts in preservation efforts.
In the nineteenth and early twentieth century many historic artifacts in museum collections were treated with a variety of pesticide, fungicides, and other preservative agents. For example, during the ninetieth and early twentieth centuries tobacco, camphor, strychnine, carbolic acid, sulfur, mercuric chloride, thymol, naphthalene, and several forms of arsenic were often used for preservation. In the later half of the twentieth century other types of chemicals were often used, including various organochlorides (such as DDT and lindane), organophosphates (such as malathion), and organometallic compounds (such as methyl mercury acetate and or triethyl arsine). These chemicals were often liberally brushed, sprayed, and/or sprinkled onto the surfaces of the historic artifacts. Despite the passage of time, many historic artifacts in museum collections are still highly contaminated with toxic residues from these chemicals. Prolonged exposure to the artifacts may cause any of a variety of maladies to exposed persons. This hazard hinders the work of museum personnel and researchers, who need to handle the artifacts to create exhibits or to study the artifacts. Similarly, this hazard inhibits the return of some historic artifacts to native peoples who may have legal rights to the artifacts.
Accordingly, there is a need for techniques to decontaminate and/or clean fragile materials, such as delicate historic artifacts, that address their special needs, while effectively decontaminating and/or cleaning the materials.
A fragile material, such as a delicate historic artifact, may be decontaminated and/or cleaned by novel diffusion cleaning and/or evaporative cleaning techniques.
In one embodiment, diffusion cleaning is conducted by first wetting a piece of activated carbon fabric with a solvent for the contaminates. The solvent used to wet the activated carbon fabric is preferably chosen to be compatible with the fragile material, such that contaminates to be removed are soluble in the solvent, yet pigments, dyes, inks, paints, stains, and/or other types of substances desirably present on the fragile material are not soluble in the solvent, and thus not removed. Depending on the particular application, the contaminates may be rather innocuous substances whose removal is desired for largely aesthetic reasons and/or more toxic substances, for example pesticides, fungicides, and other preservative agents, that that are potentially harmful to people handling the artifacts.
The wetted activated carbon fabric is brought into contact with the surface of the fragile material in a substantially vapor-tight environment. In some configurations, a weight is applied to the upper face (i.e., the face not contacting the fragile material) of the activated carbon fabric, to promote full contact between the fabric and the fragile material. The solvent dissolves the contaminates present on the surface of the fragile material. Thereafter, the contaminates molecularly diffuse in the solvent and are thereafter adsorbed by the activated carbon fabric, with operates as an adsorptive blotter. The process of molecular diffusion and adsorption typically requires extended periods of time, in some cases on the order of 24 hours to 120 hours. Adsorption into the activated carbon fabric substantially depletes the contaminates (or at least a portion of the contaminates to be removed in a current round of diffusion cleaning) from the surface of the fragile material. The now contaminated activated carbon fabric is removed and any remaining solvent present on the surface of, or adsorbed into, the material is allowed to evaporate.
Further, in some embodiments, evaporative cleaning may be employed in addition to, or rather than, diffusion cleaning. Evaporative cleaning may be conducted by maintaining solvent-wetted activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) in contact with the fragile material while evaporation takes place. At least the upper face of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) is exposed to the surrounding environment. As the solvent evaporates from the upper face of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric), a substantial portion of the contaminates migrate from the surface of the fragile material into the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric), where they become captured and contained. After the solvent has substantially fully evaporated, the now contaminated activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) is removed. In some embodiments, a weight is applied to some portion of the upper face of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric), to promote contact with the material.
As discussed below a variety of modifications and additions may be made to these embodiments.
The description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
a-3h are schematic diagrams of an example progression of diffusion cleaning of a porous surface of a fragile material;
At step 110, a piece of activated carbon fabric 210 sufficiently sized to cover a piece of fragile material 220 is wetted with a solvent. Activated carbon fabric 210 (i.e., activated carbon woven, bonded or otherwise integrated into a textile form) is commercially available from a number of vendors, for example Charcoal Cloth International Ltd., which markets different such fabrics under the trade name Zorflex®. The designations and properties of several representative Zorflex® activated carbon fabrics are given in the following table:
It is expressly contemplated that any of a wide variety of activated carbon fabrics may be employed, and, as such, the techniques described herein are in no way limited to this the specific activated carbon fabrics enumerated in Table 1.
Further, in some embodiments a combination of two or more fabrics may be employed, with such fabrics laminated, bonded or otherwise integrated together. For example, in one embodiment, a laminate of Zorflex® FM 50K activated carbon fabric and Zorflex® FM 100 activated carbon fabric may be employed. Similarly, in another embodiment, a laminate of a Zorflex® activate carbon fabric and a non-adsorptive facing fabric may be employed. Accordingly, when the term “activated carbon fabric” is used herein the term should be interpreted broadly to encompass many different fabrics and/or combinations of fabrics.
The solvent used to wet the activated carbon fabric 210 is preferably chosen to be compatible with the fragile material, such that contaminates 230 to be removed are soluble in the solvent, yet desired pigments, dyes, inks, paints, stains, and/or other types of substances present on the material are not soluble in the solvent. Similarly, the solvent is preferably chosen as one that does not cause physical damage to the structure of the material, for example, does not cause the material to become brittle, wrinkled, or otherwise adversely affected. In one embodiment, the solvent may be 3M™ Novec™ Engineered Fluid HFE-7200 otherwise known as ethoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OC2H5) (hereinafter referred to as “HFE-7200”), commercially available from 3M Corp. HFE-7200 is typically compatible with a wide variety of substances that may be found in historic artifacts, yet easily dissolves many toxic contaminates, such as malathion and other organophosphate pesticides, as well as methyl mercury acetate, triethyl arsine, and other organometallic compounds. In alternate embodiments, a variety of other solvents may be employed, for example Novec™ 3M™ Engineered Fluid HFE-7100 otherwise known as methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OCH3) (hereinafter referred to as “HFE-7100”), commercially available from 3M Corp., or any of a variety of other solvents appropriate for the application.
At step 120, the now wetted activated carbon fabric 210 is brought into contact with the surface of the fragile material 220 in a substantially vapor-tight environment 240. In some cases, additional solvent may applied directly to the fragile material 220.
The vapor-tight environment 240 may be achieved in a number of ways. For example, the vapor-tight environment 240 may be a sealed plastic bag or other container that is substantially air-tight. Alternately, the activated carbon fabric 210 may be covered with a vapor barrier (or the activated carbon fabric 210 may have an integrated vapor barrier) to create a substantially vapor-tight environment 240 between a solid surface on which the fragile material is resting, such as a table top, and the vapor barrier.
In some embodiments, a weight 250, for example, a metal plate or other object, is applied to the upper face (i.e., the face not contacting the fragile material) of the activated carbon fabric 210, to promote full contact of the fabric with the fragile material 220, thereby minimizing air gaps between the two. Alternately, contact may be promoted by pressure applied by a device, for example, a clip or arm (not shown), that holds the activated carbon fabric 210 in contact with the surface of the fragile material 220.
At step 130, the solvent dissolves the contaminates 230 present on the surface of the fragile material 220. As discussed above, depending on the particular application, the contaminates 230 may be rather innocuous substances whose removal is desired for largely aesthetic reasons and/or more toxic substances, for example pesticides, fungicides, and other preservative agents, that are potentially harmful to people handling the artifacts. At step 140, the contaminates 230 molecularly diffuse in the solvent. At step 150, the contaminates 230 are adsorbed, by the activated carbon fabric 210, with operates as an adsorptive blotter. The process of molecular diffusion and adsorption in steps 140 and 150 typically requires extended periods of time, during which the molecules of the contaminates 230 slowly make their way through the solvent. The exact period of time required depends on the nature of the fragile material 220, the particular contaminates 230 present, the solvent, the environment, and a variety of other factors. Accordingly, while in some embodiments the time period may be on the order of 24 hours to 120 hour, a variety of other time periods are expressly contemplated.
Further, in some cases during the extended period of time the activated carbon fabric 210 and/or the surface of the fragile material 220 may be re-wetted with solvent. Re-wetting is desirable should the solvent appear to evaporate significantly despite the substantially vapor-tight environment 240, leaving the activated carbon fabric 210 and/or the surface of the fragile material 220 dry.
At step 160, adsorption into the activated carbon fabric 210 substantially depletes the contaminates (or at least a portion of the contaminates to be removed in a current round of diffusion cleaning) from the surface of the fragile material 220. Through adsorption the activated carbon fabric 210 captures and contains the contaminates 230 as well as at least a portion of the solvent used in the decontamination and/or cleaning process. At step 170, the now contaminated activated carbon fabric 210 is removed and disposed of, for example, by sending the contaminated fabric to an appropriate waste disposal facility. Any remaining solvent present on the surface of, or adsorbed into, the fragile material 220 is allowed to evaporate. The material 220 may be removed from the vapor-tight environment 240 and exposed to the surrounding environment, for example exposed to the free-moving air of a room, placed under a fume hood, or placed in some other space to promote evaporation. If additional decontamination and/or cleaning is desire, the above described sequence of steps 110-180 may be repeated.
a-3h are schematic diagrams of an example progression of diffusion cleaning of a porous surface 310 of a fragile material. The progression provides a more specific example of an application of the techniques described above in reference to
While the above described diffusion cleaning techniques may be advantageously employed to decontaminate and/or clean the surface of a fragile material, in certain instances evaporative cleaning may be employed in addition to, or rather than, diffusion cleaning. For example, a preferred solvent that is highly compatible with a certain fragile material may contain components that interfere with the adsorption of some contaminates into activated carbon fabric, and thus may hinder the removal of some contaminates by diffusion cleaning. Accordingly, it may be desirable to first conduct a diffusion cleaning session and subsequently perform an evaporative cleaning session. For example, after step 160 of
At step 410, a solvent-wetted activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric, for example a gauze sponge) 510 is maintained in contact with the fragile material 220. In some cases, additional solvent may applied directly to the fragile material 220. The activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510 is wetted with a solvent in which the contaminates are soluble, yet which is compatible with the material to be decontaminated and/or cleaned. For example, the solvent may be HFE-7200, HFE-7100, or another suitable solvent. In some embodiments, a weight (not shown) is applied to some portion of the upper face of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510, to promote full contact with the fragile material 220. Alternately, contact may be promoted by pressure applied by a device, for example a clip or arm. Care should be taken, however, to ensure that any weight or device does not impede evaporation where decontamination and/or cleaning is desired.
At step 420, the solvent dissolves contaminates 230 present on the surface of the fragile material 220. At step 430, at least the upper face (i.e., the face not contacting the fragile material) of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510 is exposed to the surrounding environment, for example, exposed to the free-moving air of a room, placed under a fume hood, or placed in some other space to promote evaporation. At step 440, the solvent evaporates from the upper face of the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510. At step 550, as the solvent evaporates, a substantial portion of the contaminates 230 migrate from the surface of the material 220 into the activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510, where they become captured and contained. At step 560, after the solvent has substantially fully evaporated, the now contaminated activated carbon fabric (or other type of fabric) 510 is removed and disposed of, for example, sent to an appropriate waste disposal facility. If additional decontamination and/or cleaning is desired, the sequence of steps 510-560 may be repeated.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of several embodiments. Further modifications and additions may be made without departing from the disclosure's intended spirit and scope. For example, while the above descriptions discuss fragile materials, for example delicate historic artifacts, the techniques disclosed herein are in no way limited to use only with fragile materials. They alternately may be applied to a variety of robust, sturdy, or otherwise non-fragile materials. Further, the techniques described above need not be applied in isolation, and it is expressly contemplated that they may be used in conjunction with other decontamination and/or cleaning techniques, as part of a multi-stage decontamination and/or cleaning process. Accordingly, it should be remembered that the above descriptions are meant to be taken only by way of example, and the invention is not restricted to any one particular embodiment, configuration or implementation discussed above. Rather, the invention is defined by the following claims.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/451,294 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,494,629 entitled “Decontamination System and Method of Decontamination,” filed on Jun. 12, 2006, which itself is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/154,428, now abandoned entitled “Decontamination System and Method of Decontamination,” filed on May 23, 2002, and which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/293,016, which was filed on May 23, 2001 for a “Decontamination System and Methods of Decontamination.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2933453 | Burks, Jr. | Apr 1960 | A |
3874849 | Teng et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4842746 | Fowler et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847089 | Kramer et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850729 | Kramer et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4928681 | Langston et al. | May 1990 | A |
5079792 | D'Haen | Jan 1992 | A |
5230960 | Iizuka | Jul 1993 | A |
5264044 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
5695775 | Von Blucher et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5938858 | Yokoyama et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6053952 | Kaiser | Apr 2000 | A |
6156407 | Neubauer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6269513 | Torobin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6375976 | Roden et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
903622 | Mar 1986 | BE |
0053936 | Apr 1989 | EP |
09111653 | Apr 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60293016 | May 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11451294 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 11738489 | US | |
Parent | 10154428 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 11451294 | US |