Patent Grant
9916457
Field
This disclosure is generally related to Content Centric Networking. More specifically, this disclosure is related to binding a name to a data object.
Related Art
In a typical Content Centric Networking (CCN) architecture, a Content Object has a name, and a content. Whenever a hash is created for the Content Object, the hash is generated based on the Content Object's content, as well as its name. Then, when a publisher signs a Content Object, the publisher generates the signature by encrypting the hash that binds of the Content Object's name and the content. Hence, the signature in the Content Object binds the Content Object's name to its content.
Also, some Content Objects can be requested based on their hash value. For example, a typical Manifest for a data collection can include a hash for a plurality of Content Object's in the data collection, and can include a signature for each of these hash values. An entity that obtains the Manifest can use the hash values in the Manifest to request the individual Content Objects listed in the Manifest. However, even though the Content Object can be requested by its hash value, the Content Object is still tied to a specific name because the hash was generated in part based on this network name.
These hash values make it difficult to bind other names to a Content Object without conflicting with the Content Object's signature or it's hash value. Assigning a new name to an existing Content Object in the typical CCN architecture requires creating a new Content Object that binds the new name to a copy of the existing Content Object's data. It is not currently possible for one piece of content to be assigned multiple signed names.
One embodiment provides a data-hosting system that facilitates binding a decoupled name to a data object. This decoupled name includes a name for the data object, and includes a signature that binds the name to the data object's hash value. During operation, the system can receive a command to generate a decoupled name for a data object. The command can include a new name to bind to the data object. The system generates a hash for the data object based on the data object's content, such that the hash is not generated based on a name for the data object. The system then obtains a private key for signing the data object, and generates the decoupled name for the data object by encrypting the data object's hash and the new name using the private key.
In some embodiments, the data object includes a Content Centric Networking (CCN) Content Object or an Information Centric Networking (ICN) Content Object.
In Information Centric Networks, each piece of content is individually named, and each piece of data is bound to a unique name that distinguishes the data from any other piece of data, such as other versions of the same data or data from other sources. This unique name allows a network device to request the data by disseminating a request or an Interest that indicates the unique name, and can obtain the data independent from the data's storage location, network location, application, and means of transportation. Named-data network (NDN) or a content-centric network (CCN) are examples of ICN architecture; the following terms describe elements of an NDN or CCN architecture:
Content Object: A single piece of named data, which is bound to a unique name. Content Objects are “persistent,” which means that a Content Object can move around within a computing device, or across different computing devices, but does not change. If any component of the Content Object changes, the entity that made the change creates a new Content Object that includes the updated content, and binds the new Content Object to a new unique name.
Unique Names: A name in an CCN is typically location independent and uniquely identifies a Content Object. A data-forwarding device can use the name or name prefix to forward a packet toward a network node that generates or stores the Content Object, regardless of a network address or physical location for the Content Object. In some embodiments, the name may be a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI). The HSVLI can be divided into several hierarchical components, which can be structured in various ways. For example, the individual name components parc, home, ndn, and test.txt can be structured in a left-oriented prefix-major fashion to form the name “/parc/home/ndn/test.txt.” Thus, the name “/parc/home/ndn” can be a “parent” or “prefix” of “/parc/home/ndn/test.txt.” Additional components can be used to distinguish between different versions of the content item, such as a collaborative document.
In some embodiments, the name can include an identifier, such as a hash value that is derived from the Content Object's data (e.g., a checksum value) and/or from elements of the Content Object's name. A description of a hash-based name is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,814 (entitled “ORDERED-ELEMENT NAMING FOR NAME-BASED PACKET FORWARDING,” by inventor Ignacio Solis, filed 20 Mar. 2013), which is hereby incorporated by reference. A name can also be a flat label. Hereinafter, “name” is used to refer to any name for a piece of data in a name-data network, such as a hierarchical name or name prefix, a flat name, a fixed-length name, an arbitrary-length name, or a label (e.g., a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) label).
Interest: A packet that indicates a request for a piece of data, and includes a name (or a name prefix) for the piece of data. A data consumer can disseminate a request or Interest across an information-centric network, which CCN/NDN routers can propagate toward a storage device (e.g., a cache server) or a data producer that can provide the requested data to satisfy the request or Interest.
In some embodiments, the ICN system can include a content-centric networking (CCN) architecture. However, the methods disclosed herein are also applicable to other ICN architectures as well. A description of a CCN architecture is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,175 (entitled “CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF INTERESTS AND CONTENT IN A CONTENT CENTRIC NETWORK,” by inventors Van L. Jacobson and Diana K. Smetters, filed 18 Dec. 2008), which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In some embodiments, the system can receive a request to access the data object, such that the request includes a network name for the content. The system selects the data object based on the network name for the content, and selects the decoupled name based on the hash for the content. The system then returns at least the decoupled name to the entity which requested the data object.
In some variations to these embodiments, while returning at least the decoupled name, the system returns the data object and the decoupled name as separate objects.
In some variations to these embodiments, while returning at least the decoupled name, the system can create a new data object that includes the original data object's contents and also includes the decoupled name, and returns the new data object that includes the decoupled name.
In some variations to these embodiments, while returning at least the decoupled name, the system generates a Manifest that includes the decoupled name, and returns the Manifest.
In some variations to these embodiments, the data object request can include an Interest message which includes the network name or the new name for the data object.
One embodiment provides a client device that can validate a data object based on a decoupled name received for the data object. During operation, the client can request a data object based on a network name for the data object. In response to sending the request, the client can receive a decoupled name associated with content of the data object. The decoupled name includes a second name different than the network name for the data object, and includes a signature generated based on a hash value of the data object's content and the second name. The client then validates the decoupled name.
In some embodiments, while receiving the decoupled name, the client can receive a respective decoupled name as a separate data object from the data object.
In some embodiments, while receiving the decoupled name, the client can receive a respective decoupled name embedded in the data object.
In some embodiments, while receiving the decoupled name, the client can receive a Manifest which includes the at least one decoupled name.
In some variations to these embodiments, the client obtains an object hash value from a decoupled name in the Manifest, and disseminates an Interest for a data object identified by the object hash value. Then, responsive to disseminating the Interest, the client can obtain a nameless data object whose hash value matches the decoupled name's object hash value.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention provide a content management system that solves the problem of binding multiple names to a data object. For example, an entity such as a user or an online service may need a piece of content to have multiple names, perhaps to allow the content to be accessible via any of its multiple names, or to allow different entities to sign and name the same piece of content.
To achieve this, the entity generates a hash for a piece of content based on the content itself, and not based on a name for the content. This entity can cryptographically bind a name to the content by using its private key to generate a signature based on their name for the content and the content's hash. In some embodiments, this entity can generate the signature using the same hash they used to access the content (e.g., when accessing a nameless object); they don't need to recomputed the hash for the content.
Other entities can also generate their own decoupled names for the content by using their own private keys to generate a signature that cryptographically binds a different name to the content's hash. Hence, the content can have a signature for each name that is cryptographically bound to the content, regardless of which entity is binding (e.g., signing) the name and hash.
In some embodiments, a content producer can process a request's network name to determine which data objects to return to a client, regardless of which names are used to store the data objects. For example, the content producer may be a bank that stores a client's statements under the name prefix “/bank/statements/Ignacio/statement_date,” where “statement date” specifies a month and year for a statement. The client can request his latest statement by disseminating a request or Interest for the name prefix “/bank/Ignacio/recent_statement.” The bank can determine the type of information the user is requesting based on the request's name elements, and searches for the most recent statement to return to the client, even though the statement's name does not match the request's network name.
Once the content producer selects the data object to return for the request, the content producer can create a return object with a name that includes the request's name, and with a payload that includes the requested data object and one or more decoupled names that each cryptographically binds a name to the data object. This makes it possible for the content producer to sign the data object based on the unique identifier it uses to store the data object. The client can use a decoupled name's signature to validate the data object, even though the client's request included a different network name.
In contrast, a traditional CCN architecture uses a Content Object's name to forward the Content Object, and to match the Content Object to an Interest. Hence, the Content Object's name is used by the network's forwarders, by the application that generates the Content Object, by the application that is requesting the Content Object, and by security agents that validate the Content Object. This makes it impossible for the traditional CCN architecture to allow a data object to be accessed, forwarded, or validated using any of a multiple names that are cryptographically bound to the data object.
Exemplary Network Environment
Computing environment 100 can also include a client device 108, which can include any computing device that can disseminate Interests and receive Content Objects via network 102. For example, client device 108 can include a smartphone 108.1, a tablet computer 108.2, and/or a personal computing device 108.m (e.g., a laptop). Specifically, client device 108 can disseminate an Interest that can disseminate Interests across network 102 to obtain data objects.
In some embodiments, computing environment 100 can include a content producer 104 that can host data or services for one or more client devices. For example, content producer 104 can receive and process a request or Interests from client device 108. When content producer 104 receives the request, content producer 104 can select a piece of data based on the request's name and/or search criteria, regardless of the name used to store the selected piece of data. Content producer can use a decoupled name to bind the data's local name to the data, and to sign the data and its local name for the data.
Recall that in a typical CCN architecture, a Content Object being returned over a network needs to have a name or name prefix that matches that of an Interest which requested the Content Object. In some embodiments, it's possible for network 102 to use one name for forwarding data, and for applications or client devices to use a different name (e.g., a decoupled name) to request the content and verify it's authenticity.
Hence, content producer 104 can return the data to client device 108 by generating a Content Object that includes the network name from the client's request for the data (e.g., an Interest name), and whose payload includes the piece of data and the decoupled name. The routers along a return path over the CCN can use the Content Object's network name to return the Content Object to client device 108, and client device 108 can use the decoupled name to validate the Content Object's data.
For example, an application on client device 108 can generate an Interest that requests a piece of data, such as an Interest with the name “/PARC/ccn.doc” to request ccn.doc from the “/PARC” domain. Client device 108 then disseminates the Interest across network 102, which is then forwarded toward content producer 104 that can satisfy the Interest “/PARC/ccn.doc.” The content producer 104 then uses the name “/PARC/ccn.doc” to determine which local data can be used to satisfy the Interest, and generates a Content Object that includes the Interest's name, and includes the document “ccn.doc” in the payload.
Note that when content producer 104 searches for the data to return, content producer is not limited to searching for existing data that matches the name prefix “/PARC” or “/PARC/ccn.doc.” In some embodiments, content producer can obtain a document “/PARC_Storage/ccn_v5.doc” that is known to be associated with “ccn.doc,” and generates a Content Object that includes “ccn_v5.doc.” Content producer can sign the document “ccn_v5.doc” by generating a signed decoupled name that binds any name to the document, and generates the Content Object to include this decoupled name. The name in the decoupled name can include, for example, the network name “/PARC/ccn.doc,” the storage name “/PARC_Storage/ccn_v5.doc,” or any other name which content producer 104 uses to sign the document.
In some embodiments, another content producer 106 can also generate a decoupled name for the piece of data hosted by content producer 104, even though content producer 106 does not host or did not generate the piece of data. For example, client device 108 can send a request to a trusted entity (e.g., content producer 106) to obtain a signed name for the data. This request can identify the data using an object hash of the data (and not of the data's name). The trusted entity can process this request by looking up a signed name prefix associated with this object hash, and returns this decoupled name to client device 108. The decoupled name includes the data's object hash value, a name which the trusted entity uses for the data, and the signature which binds the name to the data's object hash value.
In some embodiments, using decoupled names allows content producer 104 to move or copy the content to a new location, and to assign a new name to the content, such as a name associated with the new location. For example, if content producer 104 moves the document “ccn.doc” to a server on the domain “/PARC/CSL,” it's possible for the same Content Object to satisfy a request for “/PARC/CSL/ccn.doc,” even though the Content Object is cryptographically bound to the name “/PARC/ccn.doc.” The Content Object has the name “/PARC/CSL/ccn.doc,” but has a cryptographic signature that binds the Content Object's content to “/PARC/ccn.doc.” Thus, the Content Object can now have a network name, and can have a signed name that is different than the network name.
As another example, if content producer 104 corresponds to a bank's server that hosts banking statements, client device 108 can retrieve a bank statement by disseminating an Interest for the statement to content producer 104. Content producer 104 can use any criteria to select the matching content to return to client device 108; the data being returned does not need to match the name or name prefix of the CCN Interest. A user may disseminate an Interest that includes a query: “/bank/ignacio/statement/?month=oct&balance<10000.” Content producer 104 can process the query to search through the user's bank statements for any statement that matches the search criteria, even though the signed name may not satisfy the Interest. Once content producer 104 finds a matching piece of data, content producer 104 generates and returns a Content Object that includes the Interest's name, and that includes the matching data and a corresponding decoupled name for the data in the Content Object's payload.
In some embodiments, network name 302 can include, for example, a name which was used by a client device to access data 304. Name 310, on the other hand, can include a name that is permanently bound to data 304, and which is signed by the entity which generated decoupled name 306. If multiple entities have bound a decoupled name to data 304, content producer can generate data object 300 to include multiple decoupled names.
In some embodiments, a Content Object can be a nameless object which does not include a network name for the data. However, the data can still be self-certifying by including a signed decoupled name which is signed by a trusted entity (e.g., a content producer or host for the data) and bound to the nameless object.
The content producer can generate this cryptographic binding by obtaining a private key for signing the data object (operation 406), and encrypts the new name and the data object's hash using the private key to bind the new name to the data object's content (operation 408). The content producer the stores the decoupled name (operation 410).
Returning Data Objects with Decoupled Names
In some embodiments, a client can receive a decoupled name implicitly, for example, when the client receives a data object that includes one or more decoupled names as illustrated in
However, if a decoupled name does exist for the data object, the content producer obtains the decoupled name from a storage repository (operation 510), and returns the data object and the decoupled name to the client device to satisfy the request. For example, the content producer can determine whether it needs to return the decoupled name together or separate from the data object (operation 512). The content producer can determine how it needs to return the decoupled name based on a configuration pre-set by an administrator, or based on an instruction in the request.
If the content producer is to return the decoupled name separately, the content producer proceeds to return the data object and the decoupled name as separate data objects (operation 514). Otherwise, if the content producer is to return the data object and the decoupled names together, the content producer can generate a new data object that includes the decoupled name embedded in the data object (operation 516), and returns the new data object (operation 518).
In some embodiments, a client can receive a data object for a piece of content and any associated decoupled names as separate objects, each accessed via its own network name. This allows the content and its decoupled names to be stored separately, and to hosted and served by different entities.
If so, the client device can obtain the decoupled name (operation 708). For example, the client device can obtain the decoupled name directly from the response received from the content producer. Alternatively, the client can obtain a reference to the decoupled name from the response, and can issue a separate request to receive the decoupled name for the requested data object in a separate data object. The client then validates the decoupled name (operation 710). If the decoupled name is valid, the client can accept the data object (operation 712). However, if validation was not successful, the client may perform a remedial action (operation 714), such as to reject the data object, prompt the user to decide whether to accept the data object, or perform another remedial action.
Manifests with Decoupled Names
A publisher can host a collection of nameless Content Objects across various replica servers or hosting servers. These nameless Content Objects are truly placeless objects, as they do not include a name, and thus don't have an implied routing. The publisher can create a Manifest (or a hierarchy of Manifests) for a nameless Content Object or a collection of nameless Content Objects. This allows the publisher to provide the Manifest (or a root Manifest of a Manifest hierarchy) to a client that requests these Content Objects so that the client can generate Interests to request the nameless Content Objects. A description of a Manifest is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/337,026, entitled “SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING NAMELESS OBJECTS USING SELF-CERTIFYING NAMES,” by inventor Marc Mosko, filed 21 Jul. 2014), which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The Manifest (or root Manifest) can include Content Object hash (COH) values that can be used to uniquely identify nameless Content Objects or other non-root Manifests. The Manifest also includes a network name or name prefix for a server that hosts the Manifest, and that may also host the nameless Content Objects.
In some embodiments, a Manifest can include decoupled names to one or more data objects. For example, the Manifest can point to other Manifests or content (e.g., Content Objects) by their hash value, regardless of their name. The content can be a data object produced by a content producer, such as a picture taken by a user's mobile phone. The mobile phone can compute a hash of the data object, and can create a decoupled name that is cryptographically binds the name to the data object's hash, and can create a Manifest that includes this decoupled name. This Manifest can be stored across any namespace or name prefix, such as a name prefix for the user's mobile phone, for his personal computer, for an online storage repository (e.g., Dropbox), or for an online service (e.g., an online social network).
A data consumer can obtain the data object by first obtaining the Manifest from any of the namespaces that can provide the Manifest. For example, the data object can be for a picture which the user's mobile phone named “/isolis/pictures/101.jpg.” If the user shared the picture via an online service (e.g., the photo hosting service Flickr by Yahoo! Inc.), the online service can return a Manifest that includes a decoupled name that binds the picture's name and signature to a COH for the picture. When the data consumer receives the Manifest, the consumer can use the decoupled name to obtain the COH for the picture, as well as to determine a name binding for the picture.
In some embodiments, the Manifest can be signed by the online service that is hosting the Manifest, for example, by including a decoupled name bound to the Manifest's COH. Also, the decoupled name for the picture may have been generated by the user's mobile phone. Hence, when the data consumer receives the Manifest, the consumer can use the Manifest's signature to verify that the Manifest indeed originated from the online service, and can use the picture's decoupled name in the Manifest to verify the authenticity of the object itself (e.g., to verify that the picture itself originated from the user's mobile phone). Hence, the decoupled name can be used to validate the picture, regardless of which entity provided the Manifest, and regardless of where the picture is hosted or from which namespace the picture is received.
In some embodiments, a data object may have multiple names that are cryptographically bound to the data object, by different entities. For example, if the data object is a picture that includes multiple people, each person in the picture can generate a separate decoupled name for the picture, which is signed using that person's private key. Other users can use the COH to obtain the picture, and can use a decoupled name from a person in the picture to validate the picture (e.g., to verify that this person is indeed in the picture).
These decoupled name objects can be stored and disseminated separately (e.g., as their own objects), in a Manifest (which can include decoupled names for different objects or the same object), or embedded in the object they're naming. For example, a picture hosting service can allow various users to “tag” themselves in the picture. Then, when a user views or downloads the picture, the hosting service can return a picture object that includes the separate decoupled name objects from each person in the picture that has digitally signed the picture. Alternatively, the online service can generate a Manifest that includes these separate decoupled name objects from each person in the picture.
In some embodiments, communication module 802 can send a decoupled name for a data object to a client, and/or can receive a decoupled name from a content producer. Hash-computing module 804 can compute a hash for the data object's contents without accounting for the data object's name. Name-binding module 806 can bind a name to the data object by using a publisher's key to sign the name and the hash for the data object. Manifest-generating module 808 can generate a Manifest which includes one or more decoupled names associated with one or more data objects in a collection of objects. Data-validating module 810 can validate a data object by validating a signature in a decoupled name for the data object.
Data-managing system 918 can include instructions, which when executed by computer system 902, can cause computer system 902 to perform methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data-managing system 918 may include instructions for sending a decoupled name for a data object to a client, and/or can receiving a decoupled name from a content producer (communication module 920). Further, data-managing system 918 can include instructions for computing a hash for the data object's contents without accounting for the data object's name (hash-computing module 922). Data-managing system 918 can also include instructions for binding a name to the data object by using a publisher's key to sign the name and the hash for the data object (name-binding module 924).
Data-managing system 918 can include instructions for generating a Manifest which includes one or more decoupled names associated with one or more data objects in a collection of objects (manifest-generating module 922). Data-managing system 918 can also include instructions for validating a data object by validating a signature in a decoupled name for the data object (data-validating module 924).
Data 926 can include any data that is required as input or that is generated as output by the methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data 926 can store at least a collection of data objects, and a set of decoupled names for the data objects.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.
The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 817441 | Niesz | Apr 1906 | A |
| 4309569 | Merkle | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4921898 | Lenney | May 1990 | A |
| 5070134 | Oyamada | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5110856 | Oyamada | May 1992 | A |
| 5214702 | Fischer | May 1993 | A |
| 5377354 | Scannell | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5506844 | Rao | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5629370 | Freidzon | May 1997 | A |
| 5845207 | Amin | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5870605 | Bracho | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6047331 | Medard | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052683 | Irwin | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6085320 | Kaliski, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091724 | Chandra | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6128623 | Mattis | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6128627 | Mattis | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6173364 | Zenchelsky | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6209003 | Mattis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6226618 | Downs | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233617 | Rothwein | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233646 | Hahm | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6289358 | Mattis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292880 | Mattis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6332158 | Risley | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6363067 | Chung | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366988 | Skiba | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6574377 | Cahill | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6654792 | Verma | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6667957 | Corson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6681220 | Kaplan | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6681326 | Son | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6732273 | Byers | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6769066 | Botros | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6772333 | Brendel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6775258 | vanValkenburg | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6862280 | Bertagna | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6901452 | Bertagna | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6915307 | Mattis | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6917985 | Madruga | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6957228 | Graser | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6968393 | Chen | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6981029 | Menditto | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7007024 | Zelenka | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7013389 | Srivastava | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7031308 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043637 | Bolosky | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7061877 | Gummalla | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7080073 | Jiang | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| RE39360 | Aziz | Oct 2006 | E |
| 7149750 | Chadwick | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152094 | Jannu | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7177646 | ONeill | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7206860 | Murakami | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206861 | Callon | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7210326 | Kawamoto | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7246159 | Aggarwal | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257837 | Xu | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7287275 | Moskowitz | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7315541 | Housel | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7339929 | Zelig | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350229 | Lander | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7362727 | ONeill | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7382787 | Barnes | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7395507 | Robarts | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7430755 | Hughes | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7444251 | Nikovski | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7466703 | Arunachalam | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7472422 | Agbabian | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7496668 | Hawkinson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7509425 | Rosenberg | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7523016 | Surdulescu | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7542471 | Samuels | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7543064 | Juncker | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552233 | Raju | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7555482 | Korkus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7555563 | Ott | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7564812 | Elliott | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7567547 | Mosko | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567946 | Andreoli | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7580971 | Gollapudi | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7623535 | Guichard | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636767 | Lev-Ran | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7647507 | Feng | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7660324 | Oguchi | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7685290 | Satapati | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7698463 | Ogier | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698559 | Chaudhury | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7769887 | Bhattacharyya | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7779467 | Choi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7801069 | Cheung | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801177 | Luss | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7816441 | Elizalde | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7831733 | Sultan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7873619 | Faibish | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7908337 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7924837 | Shabtay | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7953014 | Toda | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953885 | Devireddy | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7979912 | Roka | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 8000267 | Solis | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8010691 | Kollmansberger | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8069023 | Frailong | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8074289 | Carpentier | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8117441 | Kurien | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8160069 | Jacobson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8204060 | Jacobson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214364 | Bigus | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224985 | Takeda | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225057 | Zheng | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8271578 | Sheffi | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271687 | Turner | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8312064 | Gauvin | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8332357 | Chung | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8386622 | Jacobson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8447851 | Anderson | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8462781 | McGhee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467297 | Liu | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473633 | Eardley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8553562 | Allan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8572214 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8654649 | Vasseur | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8665757 | Kling | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8667172 | Ravindran | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8677451 | Bhimaraju | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8688619 | Ezick | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8699350 | Kumar | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8718055 | Vasseur | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8750820 | Allan | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8761022 | Chiabaut | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8762477 | Xie | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8762570 | Qian | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8762707 | Killian | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8767627 | Ezure | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8817594 | Gero | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8826381 | Kim | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8832302 | Bradford | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8836536 | Marwah | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8861356 | Kozat | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8862774 | Vasseur | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868779 | ONeill | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8874842 | Kimmel | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8880682 | Bishop | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903756 | Zhao | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8923293 | Jacobson | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8934496 | Vasseur | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8937865 | Kumar | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 8972969 | Gaither | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8977596 | Montulli | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9002921 | Westphal | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9032095 | Traina | May 2015 | B1 |
| 9071498 | Beser | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9112895 | Lin | Aug 2015 | B1 |
| 9137152 | Xie | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9253087 | Zhang | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9270598 | Oran | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9280610 | Gruber | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 20020002680 | Carbajal | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010795 | Brown | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038296 | Margolus | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048269 | Hong | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054593 | Morohashi | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077988 | Sasaki | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078066 | Robinson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138551 | Erickson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152305 | Jackson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188605 | Adya | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020199014 | Yang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004621 | Bousquet | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009365 | Tynan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033394 | Stine | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046396 | Richter | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046437 | Eytchison | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030048793 | Pochon | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051100 | Patel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061384 | Nakatani | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074472 | Lucco | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088696 | McCanne | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099237 | Mitra | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140257 | Paterka | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229892 | Sardera | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040024879 | Dingman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030602 | Rosenquist | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064737 | Milliken | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071140 | Jason | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073617 | Milliken | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073715 | Folkes | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139230 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196783 | Shinomiya | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218548 | Kennedy | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221047 | Grover | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225627 | Botros | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233916 | Takeuchi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246902 | Weinstein | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252683 | Kennedy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003832 | Osafune | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028156 | Hammond | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043060 | Brandenberg | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050211 | Kaul | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074001 | Mattes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132207 | Mourad | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149508 | Deshpande | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159823 | Hayes | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198351 | Nog | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249196 | Ansari | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259637 | Chu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262217 | Nonaka | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281288 | Banerjee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286535 | Shrum | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010249 | Sabesan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029102 | Abe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060039379 | Abe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051055 | Ohkawa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072523 | Richardson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060099973 | Nair | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129514 | Watanabe | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133343 | Huang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146686 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173831 | Basso | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193295 | White | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203804 | Whitmore | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206445 | Andreoli | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215684 | Capone | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223504 | Ishak | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242155 | Moore | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256767 | Suzuki | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268792 | Belcea | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070019619 | Foster | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073888 | Madhok | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094265 | Korkus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112880 | Yang | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124412 | Narayanaswami | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127457 | Mirtorabi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160062 | Morishita | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162394 | Zager | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171828 | Dalal | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189284 | Kecskemeti | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195765 | Heissenbuttel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204011 | Shaver | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209067 | Fogel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239892 | Ott | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240207 | Belakhdar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245034 | Retana | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253418 | Shiri | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255677 | Alexander | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255699 | Sreenivas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255781 | Li | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274504 | Maes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275701 | Jonker | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276907 | Maes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283158 | Danseglio | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294187 | Scherrer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005056 | Stelzig | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005223 | Flake | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010366 | Duggan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037420 | Tang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043989 | Furutono | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046340 | Brown | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059631 | Bergstrom | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080080440 | Yarvis | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082662 | Dandliker | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095159 | Suzuki | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101357 | Iovanna | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107034 | Jetcheva | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107259 | Satou | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123862 | Rowley | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133583 | Artan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133755 | Pollack | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080151755 | Nishioka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080159271 | Kutt | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165775 | Das | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080186901 | Itagaki | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200153 | Fitzpatrick | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215669 | Gaddy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216086 | Tanaka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243992 | Jardetzky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250006 | Dettinger | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256138 | Sim-Tang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256359 | Kahn | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270618 | Rosenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271143 | Stephens | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287142 | Keighran | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288580 | Wang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291923 | Back | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080298376 | Takeda | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320148 | Capuozzo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090006659 | Collins | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013324 | Gobara | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022154 | Kiribe | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024641 | Quigley | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030978 | Johnson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037763 | Adhya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052660 | Chen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067429 | Nagai | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077184 | Brewer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092043 | Lapuh | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090097631 | Gisby | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103515 | Pointer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113068 | Fujihira | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090116393 | Hughes | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117922 | Bell | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132662 | Sheridan | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135728 | Shen | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144300 | Chatley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157887 | Froment | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090185745 | Momosaki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193101 | Munetsugu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198832 | Shah | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222344 | Greene | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228593 | Takeda | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254572 | Redlich | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268905 | Matsushima | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274158 | Sharp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276396 | Gorman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285209 | Stewart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287835 | Jacobson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287853 | Carson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288076 | Johnson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288143 | Stebila | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288163 | Jacobson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292743 | Bigus | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293121 | Bigus | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296719 | Maier | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300079 | Shitomi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300407 | Kamath | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300512 | Ahn | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307333 | Welingkar | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090323632 | Nix | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005061 | Basco | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100027539 | Beverly | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100046546 | Ram | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057929 | Merat | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058346 | Narang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088370 | Wu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094767 | Miltonberger | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094876 | Huang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100098093 | Ejzak | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100465 | Cooke | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103870 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100124191 | Vos | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125911 | Bhaskaran | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131660 | Dec | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100165976 | Khan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169478 | Saha | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169503 | Kollmansberger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100180332 | Ben-Yochanan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182995 | Hwang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185753 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195653 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195654 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195655 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217874 | Anantharaman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217985 | Fahrny | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232402 | Przybysz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232439 | Dham | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235516 | Nakamura | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246549 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250497 | Redlich | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250939 | Adams | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100257149 | Cognigni | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268782 | Zombek | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272107 | Papp | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281263 | Ugawa | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284309 | Allan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284404 | Gopinath | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293293 | Beser | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322249 | Thathapudi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110013637 | Xue | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110019674 | Iovanna | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022812 | vanderLinden | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029952 | Harrington | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055392 | Shen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055921 | Narayanaswamy | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060716 | Forman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060717 | Forman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090908 | Jacobson | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106755 | Hao | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131308 | Eriksson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137919 | Ryu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145597 | Yamaguchi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145858 | Philpott | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149858 | Hwang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153840 | Narayana | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158122 | Murphy | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161408 | Kim | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202609 | Chaturvedi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219093 | Ragunathan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219427 | Hito | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219727 | May | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225293 | Rathod | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231578 | Nagappan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239256 | Gholmieh | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258049 | Ramer | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264824 | Venkata Subramanian | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265159 | Ronda | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265174 | Thornton | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110271007 | Wang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110280214 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286457 | Ee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286459 | Rembarz | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295783 | Zhao | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110299454 | Krishnaswamy | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120011170 | Elad | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011551 | Levy | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023113 | Ferren | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036180 | Thornton | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120045064 | Rembarz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120047361 | Erdmann | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066727 | Nozoe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106339 | Mishra | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110159 | Richardson | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114313 | Phillips | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120803 | Farkas | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120127994 | Ko | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136676 | Goodall | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136945 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120137367 | Dupont | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120141093 | Yamaguchi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120155464 | Kim | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158973 | Jacobson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120163373 | Lo | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166433 | Tseng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120170913 | Isozaki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179653 | Araki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197690 | Agulnek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198048 | Ioffe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221150 | Arensmeier | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224487 | Hui | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226902 | Kim | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257500 | Lynch | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284791 | Miller | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290669 | Parks | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290919 | Melnyk | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291102 | Cohen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120300669 | Zahavi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120307629 | Vasseur | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314580 | Hong | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317307 | Ravindran | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120322422 | Frecks | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323933 | He | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331112 | Chatani | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130024560 | Vasseur | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130041982 | Shi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051392 | Filsfils | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054971 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060962 | Wang | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130061084 | Barton | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066823 | Sweeney | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073552 | Rangwala | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073882 | Inbaraj | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130074155 | Huh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130090942 | Robinson | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091539 | Khurana | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110987 | Kim | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130111063 | Lee | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128786 | Sultan | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132719 | Kobayashi | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130139245 | Thomas | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130151584 | Westphal | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130151646 | Chidambaram | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130152070 | Bhullar | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130163426 | Beliveau | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130166668 | Byun | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173822 | Hong | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182568 | Lee | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182931 | Fan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185406 | Choi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191412 | Kitamura | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130197698 | Shah | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198119 | Eberhardt, III | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212185 | Pasquero | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219038 | Lee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219081 | Qian | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219478 | Mahamuni | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223237 | Hui | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227048 | Xie | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227114 | Vasseur | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227166 | Ravindran | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242996 | Varvello | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130250809 | Hui | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262365 | Dolbear | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262698 | Schwan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282854 | Jang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282860 | Zhang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282920 | Zhang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130304758 | Gruber | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130304937 | Lee | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325888 | Oneppo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329696 | Xu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332971 | Fisher | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130336103 | Vasseur | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130336323 | Srinivasan | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130339481 | Hong | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130343408 | Cook | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140003232 | Guichard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140003424 | Matsuhira | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006354 | Parkison | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006565 | Muscariello | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140029445 | Hui | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032714 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033193 | Palaniappan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140040505 | Barton | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140040628 | Fort | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140043987 | Watve | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047513 | vantNoordende | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074730 | Arensmeier | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140075567 | Raleigh | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082135 | Jung | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082661 | Krahnstoever | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140089454 | Jeon | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140096249 | Dupont | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098685 | Shattil | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108313 | Heidasch | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108474 | David | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140115037 | Liu | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122587 | Petker et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129736 | Yu | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136814 | Stark | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140348 | Perlman | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143370 | Vilenski | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140146819 | Bae | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140149733 | Kim | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156396 | deKozan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140165207 | Engel | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172783 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172981 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140173034 | Liu | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140173076 | Ravindran | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140181140 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192677 | Chew | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192717 | Liu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195328 | Ferens | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195641 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195666 | Dumitriu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140204945 | Byun | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214942 | Ozonat | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140233575 | Xie | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237085 | Park | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237095 | Bevilacqua-Linn | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245359 | DeFoy | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254595 | Luo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280823 | Varvello | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140281489 | Peterka | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140281505 | Zhang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282816 | Xie | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289325 | Solis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289790 | Wilson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140298248 | Kang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140314093 | You | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337276 | Iordanov | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140365550 | Jang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150006896 | Franck | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150018770 | Baran | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032892 | Narayanan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150033365 | Mellor | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039890 | Khosravi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063802 | Bahadur | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150089081 | Thubert | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150095481 | Ohnishi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150095514 | Yu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150120663 | LeScouarnec | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169758 | Assom | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150188770 | Naiksatam | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150195149 | Vasseur | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207633 | Ravindran | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207864 | Wilson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150279348 | Cao | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288755 | Mosko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150312300 | Mosko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150349961 | Mosko | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150372903 | Hui | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150381546 | Mahadevan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160019275 | Mosko | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160021172 | Mahadevan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160062840 | Scott | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160110466 | Uzun | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160134915 | Oran | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149978 | Wissingh | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160171184 | Solis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 103873371 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 1720277 | Jun 1967 | DE |
| 19620817 | Nov 1997 | DE |
| 0295727 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 0757065 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 1077422 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 1383265 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1384729 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1473889 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 2120402 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2120419 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2120419 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2124415 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2214357 | Aug 2010 | EP |
| 2299754 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2323346 | May 2011 | EP |
| 2552083 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2214356 | May 2016 | EP |
| 03005288 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03042254 | May 2003 | WO |
| 03049369 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 03091297 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2007113180 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007122620 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2007144388 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2011049890 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2012077073 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2013123410 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2015084327 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Jacobson, Van et al., “Content-Centric Networking, Whitepaper Describing Future Assurable Global Networks”, Palo Alto Research Center, Inc., Jan. 30, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
| Koponen, Teemu et al., “A Data-Oriented (and Beyond) Network Architecture”, SIGCOMM '07, Aug. 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan, XP-002579021, p. 181-192. |
| Fall, K. et al., “DTN: an architectural retrospective”, Selected areas in communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 28, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2008, pp. 828-835. |
| Gritter, M. et al., ‘An Architecture for content routing support in the Internet’, Proceedings of 3rd Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 2001, pp. 37-48. |
| A. Broder and A. Karlin, “Multilevel Adaptive Hashing”, Jan. 1990, pp. 43-53. |
| A. Wolman, M. Voelker, N. Sharma N. Cardwell, A. Karlin, and H.M. Levy, “On the scale and performance of cooperative web proxy caching,” ACM SIGHOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 16-31, Dec. 1999. |
| B. Ahlgren et al., ‘A Survey of Information-centric Networking’ IEEE Commun. Magazine, Jul. 2012, pp. 26-36. |
| Bari, MdFaizul, et al. ‘A survey of naming and routing in information-centric networks.’ Communications Magazine, IEEE 50.12 (2012): 44-53. |
| Baugher, Mark et al., “Self-Verifying Names for Read-Only Named Data”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Mar. 2012, pp. 274-279. |
| Cho, Jin-Hee, Ananthram Swami, and Ray Chen. “A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 13.4 (2011): 562-583. |
| Detti et al., “Supporting the Web with an information centric network that routes by name”, Aug. 2012, Computer Networks 56, pp. 3705-3702. |
| Dijkstra, Edsger W., and Carel S. Scholten. ‘Termination detection for diffusing computations.’ Information Processing Letters 11.1 (1980): 1-4. |
| Dijkstra, Edsger W., Wim HJ Feijen, and A—J M. Van Gasteren. “Derivation of a termination detection algorithm for distributed computations.” Control Flow and Data Flow: concepts of distributed programming. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986. 507-512. |
| Fayazbakhsh, S. K., Lin, Y., Tootoonchian, A., Ghodsi, A., Koponen, T., Maggs, B., & Shenker, S. {Aug. 2013). Less pain, most of the gain: Incrementally deployable ICN. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 147-158). ACM. |
| G. Tyson, S. Kaune, S. Miles, Y. El-Khatib, A. Mauthe, and A. Taweel, “A trace-driven analysis of caching in content-centric networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICCCN 2012, Munich, Germany, Jul.-Aug. 2012, pp. 1-7. |
| G. Wang, Q. Liu, and J. Wu, “Hierarchical attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control in cloud storage services,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737. |
| Herlich, Matthias et al., “Optimizing Energy Efficiency for Bulk Transfer Networks”, Apr. 13, 2010, pp. 1-3, retrieved for the Internet: URL:http://www.cs.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/informationik/ag-karl/publications/miscellaneous/optimizing.pdf (retrieved on Mar. 9, 2012). |
| Hoque et al., ‘NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol’, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN 2013, pp. 15-20. |
| I. Psaras, R.G. Clegg, R. Landa, W.K. Chai, and G. Pavlou, “Modelling and evaluation of CCN-caching trees,” in Proc. IFIP Networking 2011, Valencia, Spain, May 2011, pp. 78-91. |
| J. Bethencourt, A, Sahai, and B. Waters, ‘Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption,’ in Proc. IEEE Security & Privacy 2007, Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2007, pp. 321-334. |
| J. Hur, “Improving security and efficiency in attribute-based data sharing,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., vol. 25, No. 10, pp. 2271-2282, Oct. 2013. |
| Jacobson et al., “Custodian-Based Information Sharing,” Jul. 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine: vol. 50 Issue 7 (p. 3843). |
| K. Liang, L. Fang, W. Susilo, and D.S. Wong, “A Ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption with chosen-ciphertext security,” in Proc. INCoS 2013, Xian, China, Sep. 2013, pp. 552-559. |
| Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part I.” HVAC&R Research 11.1 (2005): 3-25. |
| Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part II.” HVAC&R Research 11.2 (2005): 169-187. |
| L. Zhou, V. Varadharajan, and M. Hitchens, “Achieving secure role-based access control on encrypted data in cloud storage,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 1947-1960, Dec. 2013. |
| Lopez, Javier, et al. “Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices.” Computer Communications 33.9 (2010): 1086-1093. |
| M. Blaze, G. Bleumer, and M. Strauss, ‘Divertible protocols and atomic prosy cryptography,’ in Proc. EUROCRYPT 1998, Espoo, Finland, May-Jun. 1998, pp. 127-144. |
| M. Green and G. Ateniese, “Identity-based proxy re-encryption,” in Proc. ACNS 2007, Zhuhai, China, Jun. 2007, pp. 288-306. |
| M. Ion, J. Zhang, and E.M. Schooler, “Toward content-centric privacy in ICN: Attribute-based encryption and routing,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 39-40. |
| M. Naor and B. Pinkas “Efficient trace and revoke schemes,” in Proc. FC 2000, Anguilla, British West Indies, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-20. |
| M. Walfish, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Shenker, “Untangling the web from DNS,” in Proc. USENIX NSDI 2004, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737. |
| Matocha, Jeff, and Tracy Camp. ‘A taxonomy of distributed termination detection algorithms.’ Journal of Systems and Software 43.3 (1998): 207-221. |
| Merindol et al., “An efficient algorithm to enable path diversity in link state routing networks”, Jan. 10, Computer Networks 55 (2011), pp. 1132-1140. |
| Narasimhan, Sriram, and Lee Brownston. “HyDE—A General Framework for Stochastic and Hybrid Modelbased Diagnosis.” Proc. DX 7 (2007): 162-169. |
| Omar, Mawloud, Yacine Challal, and Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah. “Certification-based trust models in mobile ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35.1 (2012): 268-286. |
| P. Mahadevan, E.Uzun, S. Sevilla, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “CCN-krs: A key resolution service for ccn,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-centric Networking, Ser. INC 14 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 97-106. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2660129.2660154. |
| Rosenberg, J. “Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols”, Apr. 2010, pp. 1-117. |
| S. Jahid, P. Mittal, and N. Borisov, “EASiER: Encryption-based access control in social network with efficient revocation,” in Proc. ACM ASIACCS 2011, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2011, pp. 411-415. |
| S. Kamara and K. Lauter, “Cryptographic cloud storage,” in Proc. FC 2010, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan. 2010, pp. 136-149. |
| S. Kumar et al. “Peacock Hashing: Deterministic and Updatable Hashing for High Performance Networking,” 2008, pp. 556-564. |
| S. Misra, R. Tourani, and N.E. Majd, “Secure content delivery in information-centric networks: Design, implementation, and analyses,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 73-78. |
| S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Achieving secure, scalable, and fine-grained data access control in cloud computing,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2010, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-9. |
| S.J. Lee, M. Gerla, and C. Chiang, “On-demand Multicast Routing Protocol in Multihop Wireless Mobile Networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 7, No. 6, 2002. |
| Shani, Guy, Joelle Pineau, and Robert Kaplow. “A survey of point-based POMDP solvers.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 27.1 (2013): 1-51. |
| Shih, Eugene et al., ‘Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices’, Sep. 23, 2002, pp. 160-171. |
| Shneyderman, Alex et al., ‘Mobile VPN: Delivering Advanced Services in Next Generation Wireless Systems’, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 3-29. |
| T. Koponen, M. Chawla, B.-G. Chun, A. Ermolinskiy, K.H. Kim, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, ‘A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture,’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-192, Oct. 2007. |
| V. Goyal, O. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, Oct.-Nov. 2006, pp. 89-98. |
| V. Jacobson, D.K. Smetters, J.D. Thornton, M.F. Plass, N.H. Briggs, and R.L. Braynard, ‘Networking named content,’ in Proc. ACM CoNEXT 2009, Rome, Italy, Dec. 2009, pp. 1-12. |
| W.-G. Tzeng and Z.-J. Tzeng, “A public-key traitor tracing scheme with revocation using dynamic shares,” in Proc. PKC 2001, Cheju Island, Korea, Feb. 2001, pp. 207-224. |
| Wang, Jiangzhe et al.,“DMND: Collecting Data from Mobiles Using Named Data”, Vehicular Networking Conference, 2010 IEEE, pp. 49-56. |
| Xylomenos, George, et al. “A survey of information-centric networking research.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 16.2 (2014): 1024-1049. |
| Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘A case for stateful forwarding plane.’ Computer Communications 36.7 (2013): 779-791. |
| Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘Adaptive forwarding in named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review 42.3 (2012): 62-67. |
| Zahariadis, Theodore, et al. “Trust management in wireless sensor networks.” European Transactions on Telecommunications 21.4 (2010): 386-395. |
| Zhang, Lixia, et al. ‘Named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44.3 {2014): 66-73. |
| D. Trossen and G. Parisis, “Designing and realizing and information-centric internet,” IEEE Communications Magazing, vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 60-67, Jul. 2012. |
| Gasti, Paolo et al., ‘DoS & DDoS in Named Data Networking’, 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Aug. 2013, pp. 1-7. |
| J. Hur and D.K. Noh, “Attribute-based access control with efficient revocation in data outsourcing systers,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 1214-1221, Jul. 2011. |
| Wetherall, David, “Active Network vision and reality: Lessons form a capsule-based system”, ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1, 1999. pp. 64-79. |
| Kulkarni A.B. et al., “Implementation of a prototype active network”, IEEE, Open Architectures and Network Programming, Apr. 3, 1998, pp. 130-142. |
| Xie et al. “Collaborative Forwarding and Caching in Content Centric Networks”, Networking 2012. |
| Lui et al. (A TLV-Structured Data Naming Scheme for Content-Oriented Networking, pp. 5822-5827, International Workshop on the Network of the Future, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on Jun. 10-15, 2012). |
| Peter Dely et al. “OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks” Computer Communications and Networks, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 31, 2011 (Jul. 31, 2011), pp. 1-6. |
| Garnepudi Parimala et al “Proactive, reactive and hybrid multicast routing protocols for Wireless Mesh Networks”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, IEEE, Dec. 26, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
| Tiancheng Zhuang et al. “Managing Ad Hoc Networks of Smartphones”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Oct. 1, 2013. |
| Amadeo et al. “Design and Analysis of a Transport-Level Solution for Content-Centric VANETs”, University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria, Jun. 15, 2013. |
| Marc Mosko: “CCNx 1.0 Protocol Introduction” Apr. 2, 2014 [Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 8, 2016] http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.1%20CCNx%201.0%20Protocol%20Introduction.pdf paragraphs [01.3], [002], [02.1], [0003]. |
| Akash Baid et al: “Comparing alternative approaches for networking of named objects in the future Internet”, Computer Communications Workshops (Infocom Wkshps), 2012 IEEE Conference on, IEEE, Mar. 25, 2012, pp. 298-303, *Paragraph [002]* *figure1*. |
| Priya Mahadevan: “CCNx 1.0 Tutorial”, Mar. 16, 2014, pp. 1-11, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.2%20CCNx%201.0%20Tutorial.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 8, 2016] *paragraphs [003]-[006], [0011], [0013]* *figures 1,2*. |
| Marc Mosko et al “All-In-One Streams for Content Centric Networks”, May 24, 2015, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/AllinOne.pdf [downloaded Jun. 9, 2016] *the whole document*. |
| Cesar Ghali et al. “Elements of Trust in Named-Data Networking”, Feb. 13, 2014 Retrieved from the internet Jun. 17, 2016 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3332v5.pdf *p. 5, col. 1* *p. 2, col. 1-2* * Section 4.1; p. 4, col. 2* *Section 4.2; p. 4, col. 2*. |
| Priya Mahadevan et al. “CCN-KRS”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-Centric Networking, Inc. '14, Sep. 24, 2014. |
| Flavio Roberto Santos Et al. “Funnel: Choking Polluters in BitTorrent File Sharing Communities”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2011. |
| Liu Wai-Xi et al: “Multisource Dissemination in content-centric networking”, 2013 Fourth International conference on the network of the future (NOF), IEEE, Oct. 23, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
| Marie-Jose Montpetit et al.: “Network coding meets information-centric networking”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on emerging Name-Oriented mobile networking design, architecture, algorithms, and applications, NOM '12, Jun. 11, 2012, pp. 31-36. |
| Asokan et al.: “Server-Supported Signatures”, Computer Security Esorics 96, Sep. 25, 1996, pp. 131-143, Section 3. |
| Mandl et al.: “A Fast FPGA Based Coprocessor Supporting Hard Real-Time Search”, New Frontiers of Information Technology, Proceedings of the 23rd Euromicro Conference Budapest, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 499-506 *The Whole Document*. |
| Sun et al.: “Content-Based Route Lookup Using CAMs”, Global Communications Conference, IEEE, Dec. 3, 2012 *The Whole Document*. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160203322 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
