The invention relates to a safety device for a munition or warhead, which forms a decoy, for example, a missile decoy, with a novel housing design.
Explosive containers, for example, for concealment functions against missile attack, are sufficiently well known from practical use. By way of example, DE 10 2004 047 231 A1 describes an explosive block or an active agent body, as does corresponding U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2007/0266882 A1. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2007/0266882 A1 is incorporated herein in its entirety for all it discloses. Containers such as these overall form a submunition for forming a decoy, for example, as described in DE 199 51 767 C2.
Submunitions that are composed of explosive containers such as these are known, inter alia, from DE 601 19 735 T2.
A method and an apparatus for decoying IR, RF and dual-mode guided missiles using these submunitions is disclosed in WO 2007/012371 A1, which corresponds to U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2009/0251353 A1. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2009/0251353 A1 is incorporated herein in its entirety for all that it discloses. A firing device for a firing chain for submunition bodies is disclosed in DE 690 15 046 T2.
Containers such as these are ejected successively, and are fired individually, and require a safety device, in particular for a possible defect situation.
The invention is based on the object of specifying a simple safety device for a system, which simulates an apparent target.
The object of the invention is achieved by the features of a first embodiment, which pertains to a safety device (1) for a block of explosives that forms a decoy and is incorporated in an explosive container (2), having a discarding sabot (4) and a firing stemming charge (5), characterized by a prestressed tube sensor/slide (6), which is incorporated between the discarding sabot (4), the firing stemming charge (5) and the explosive container (2), such that it can open or reclose a firing channel (13) between the firing stemming charge (5) and the explosive. Advantageous embodiments can be found in the other described embodiments. For example, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment is modified so that the tube sensor (6) is physically U-shaped (8, 9), wherein tabs 10 are fitted to these webs (8, 9) in order to ensure the final position of the tube sensor (6) in the safety device (1), and a structure (11) in the form of a polygonal column with an opening (12) is incorporated between the two webs (8, 9).
The invention is based on the idea of including a simple safety device in addition to a novel equipment design of the decoy. The safety device itself comprises a so-called “tube sensor/slide” with springs, and is structurally included to interact with a discarding sabot and a firing stemming charge of the decoy. The safety device and/or parts of it and an explosive container of the decoy preferably form a physical unit. The discarding sabot and the firing stemming charge are preferably connected in an interlocking manner to the explosive container via a click-fastening system.
The firing stemming charge is held in its position during the reaction (in the function of the charge) by the click-fastening connection between the discarding sabot and the explosive container in the area of the safety device, and the design configuration of the discarding sabot, the result of which it need no longer be adhesively bonded in place, and, therefore, can be replaced or exchanged at any time.
The special feature of the safety device is the design configuration of the tube sensor, which influences the safety, function and effect of the decoy to a major extent.
The tube sensor is designed such that, once the firing channel to the explosive has been released, the firing chain can be interrupted again. This results in the safety advantage that, if the firing chain does not operate correctly, the explosive container emerging from the casing of the submunition can be considered as being safe to handle again once a specified waiting time has elapsed. The final closure of the firing channel furthermore assists the separation between the explosive container and the explosive, and prevents energy loss by “blowing out”, therefore contributing to the optimum effect of the explosive, and therefore of the decoy.
The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to one exemplary embodiment in the drawing, in which:
The tube sensor 6 is U-shaped in order to hold the two springs 7. Tabs 10 are fitted to the webs 8, 9 of the tube sensor 6 in order to ensure the final position of the tube sensor 6 in the safety device 1. A structure 11, in the form of a polygonal column provided with an opening 12 formed therein, is incorporated between the two webs 8, 9 of the tube sensor 6.
Thus, when safety device 1 is assembled with the explosive container 2 that contains a block of explosives, and with the discarding sabot 4 and the firing stemming charge 5, the assembly forms the decoy 100 provided with a simple safety device, in accordance with the present invention. As shown schematically in
When the safety device 1 moves to the third position, it operates to close the firing channel 13 after the stemming charge 5 fires the explosive 105 so that the safety device 1 contributes to an optimum effect of the explosive being realized by preventing “blowing out” energy loss through the firing channel 13. These various features of the present invention are described in more detail below.
As evident from
The shape of the tube sensor 6 and its spring prestressing allow the firing tube to be interrupted again, and the firing channel 13 is to be finally closed, when the tube sensor 6 moves on to a third position (See
In sum, when the first unit is contained in the launch tube 110 of a launcher, as shown in
In the event that the firing stemming charge 5 malfunctions, and/or in the event that the explosive 105 fails to detonate after the firing stemming charge 5 is fired, the fact that the tube sensor/slide 6 moves into the final or third position provides another safety advantage. By reclosing the firing channel 13, the tube sensor/slide 6 of the safety device 1 makes the undetonated explosive 105 safer to handle.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, the safety device 1 initially blocks the firing channel 13 when the tube sensor 6 is in the first position. The tube sensor 6 is maintained in the first position by the walls of the launch tube 110, in which the decoy 100 has been placed. When the decoy 100 leaves the launch tube 110, the tube sensor 6 “senses” that the constraining force of the wall 110 is no longer present, and the springs 7 move the tube sensor 6 to the second position, and then on to the third position. By adjusting the spring force (or spring path), the time it takes for the tube sensor 6 to reach the second position, and then the third position, after the decoy 100 has left the launch tube 110 can be adjusted. In this way, the time it takes for the firing channel 13 to open and then reclose again can be determined. This construction leads to the result that the explosive container 2 is only an illuminated target during a particular activation time or distance. Furthermore, this construction makes it possible to equalize tolerance deviations of the explosive substances.
The incident-flow protection 3 in the form of an incident-flow protective cap additionally provides a protective, supporting, guidance and positioning function for the block of explosive 105, which is packed in protective film (not illustrated in any more detail, because this is known). The cap 3, which is preferably provided with a sealing and/or an adhesive compound, is plugged on the ejection side onto two or more edge profiles 14, 15, 16, 17 of the explosive container 2.
The cap 3, furthermore, preferably has positioning spikes 18. These ensure that the block of explosive 105 is centered in the cap 3 and is held in its optimum position for operation.
While the present invention has been described with respect to an embodiment wherein the block 105 of explosives is incorporated in an explosive container 2 that is launched from a launch tube 110 so that the tube sensor 6 is pushed towards the outside due to the power of the springs 7, the invention is not limited to this embodiment. For example, in the case wherein multiple blocks 105 of explosive are enclosed in a sheath, from which the blocks 105 are expelled, the tube sensor 6 may be arranged so that it is pushed to the outside by the force of spring power. In this way, if several blocks 105 of explosive are spent via an ammunition, and then expelled, the tube sensor 6 still moves towards the outside to enable firing of the explosive blocks 105 through the firing channel 13.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the explosive block 105 is directly integrated into the magazine of a weapon so that the magazine functions as the launch tube. In this case, the explosive container 2 is disposed in a casing, which acts to constrain the tube sensor 6 in the first position until the explosive container 2 emerges from the casing thus permitting the tube sensor 6 to move to the second position and then to the third position. In this alternate embodiment of the invention, the walls 110 shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 017 725 | Apr 2008 | DE | national |
This is a Continuation-in-Part Application (Continuation Application) in the United States of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2009/001975 filed Mar. 18, 2009, which claims priority on German Patent Application No. DE 10 2008 017 725.3, filed Apr. 7, 2008. The entire disclosures of the above patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2389782 | Jackson, Jr. | Nov 1945 | A |
4029014 | Cunningham | Jun 1977 | A |
5561259 | Herbage et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
H1603 | Deckard et al. | Nov 1996 | H |
5660357 | Grossman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5763818 | Guymon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6588343 | Mulinix | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6634301 | Mulinix | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6679174 | Mulinix | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20070266882 | Gaisbauer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090251353 | Bannasch et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
84 01068 | Oct 1984 | DE |
38 28 501 | Oct 1989 | DE |
690 15 046 | Apr 1995 | DE |
199 51 767 | Jun 2002 | DE |
10 2004 047 231 | Apr 2006 | DE |
601 19 735 | Apr 2007 | DE |
2 300 035 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2007012371 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/001977, issued in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,339, completed Jul. 17, 2009, mailed Jul. 27, 2009. |
Office Action issued in co-pending related U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,339 on Apr. 20, 2012. |
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary 404 (1977). |
International Search Report issued in corresponding application No. PCT/EP2009/001975, mailed Jul. 10, 2009, mailed Jul. 21, 2009. |
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 1072 (1990). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110297033 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2009/001975 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12900258 | US |