The present invention provides a dedicated exhaust gas recirculation configuration that provides reduced exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) backflow and reduced fresh air backflow. More specifically, a one-way valve is positioned in the EGR loop to reduce or avoid fresh-air backflow into the dedicated exhaust gas recirculating cylinder and/or in the engine intake passage to reduce or avoid dedicated cylinder exhaust gas backflow into the intake passage.
For certain conventional exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) systems, exhaust gas expelled from all of the cylinders of an internal combustion engine may be collected in an exhaust manifold. A fraction of the collected exhaust gas (e.g. 5% to 10%) may then be routed from the exhaust manifold through a control valve back to an intake manifold of the engine, where it may be introduced to a stream of fresh (ambient) intake air. The remaining fraction of exhaust gas in the exhaust manifold, rather than being recirculated and recycled, generally flows to a catalytic converter of the exhaust system and, after treatment therein, may be expelled to the atmosphere through the exhaust pipe.
EGR has a history of use in gasoline spark-ignition engines, and affects combustion in several ways. First, the combustion in the cylinders of the engine may be cooled by the presence of exhaust gas, that is, the recirculated exhaust gas may absorb heat from the combustion. Furthermore, the dilution of the oxygen present in the combustion chamber with the exhaust gas, in combination with the cooler combustion, may reduce the production of mono-nitrogen oxides (NOx), such as nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Additionally, EGR may reduce the need for fuel enrichment at high loads in turbocharged engines and thereby improve fuel economy.
EGR which uses higher levels of exhaust gas may further increase fuel efficiency and reduce emissions of spark-ignition engines. However, with higher levels of exhaust gas, engines may face challenges related to EGR tolerance, which may reduce the expected fuel efficiency improvement. Challenges related to EGR tolerance may be understood to include increasing an engine's ability to process higher levels of exhaust gas without adversely affecting performance, particularly fuel economy. Thus, even if EGR tolerance may be satisfactory for engine operation at low levels of EGR, an engine may need additional modifications in structure and operational conditions to accommodate higher levels of EGR without adversely affecting engine performance.
More recently, an engine configuration has been proposed with one or more cylinders of the engine being dedicated to expelling exhaust gas for EGR, which is then directed to the intake manifold. Such cylinders may be referred to as dedicated EGR, or D-EGR, cylinders. Dedicated EGR cylinder(s) may operate at a broad range of equivalence ratios since their exhaust gas is generally not configured to exit the engine before flowing through a cylinder operating at, for example, a stoichiometric or near stoichiometric air/fuel ratio. This may allow the dedicated EGR cylinder to be operated fuel rich to produce higher levels of hydrogen (H2) gas and carbon monoxide (CO) gas and which, may in turn, increase the octane number and promote increased EGR tolerance and knock tolerance by increasing flame/speed burn rates, as well as increasing the dilution limits of the mixture and associated combustion stability of all the cylinders. Examples of engines with a D-EGR cylinder may be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0204844 entitled “Dedicated EGR Control Strategy For Improved EGR Distribution And Engine Performance” and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0204845 entitled “EGR Distributor Apparatus For Dedicated EGR Configuration.”
An internal combustion engine comprising an air intake passage in communication with an intake manifold including a plurality of cylinders, at least one of the cylinders arranged as a dedicated exhaust gas recirculation cylinder, wherein a volume of exhaust gas expelled from the dedicated exhaust gas cylinder is capable of recirculating via an exhaust gas recirculation loop to the intake manifold, including a one-way valve positioned in either of the air intake passage or the exhaust gas recirculation loop, or in both the air-intake passage and exhaust gas recirculation loop. When the one way valve is positioned in the air intake passage the valve is capable of restricting the flow of exhaust gas from the exhaust gas recirculation loop into the air intake passage. When the one-way valve is positioned in the exhaust gas recirculation loop the valve is capable of restricting the flow of air from the air intake passage into the exhaust gas recirculation loop.
The present invention also relates to an internal combustion engine comprising an air intake passage in communication with an intake manifold including a plurality of cylinders, at least one of the cylinders arranged as a dedicated exhaust gas recirculation cylinder, wherein a volume of exhaust gas expelled from the dedicated exhaust gas cylinder is capable of recirculating via an exhaust gas recirculation loop to the intake manifold, including a one-way valve positioned in said air intake passage and said exhaust gas recirculation loop. The one way valve positioned in the air intake passage is capable of restricting 0-10% by volume of exhaust gas from the exhaust gas recirculation loop from flowing into the air intake passage and the one-way valve positioned in the exhaust gas recirculation loop is capable of restricting 0-10% by volume of air from the air intake passage from flowing into the exhaust gas recirculation loop.
In method form, the present invention comprises a method of operating an internal combustion engine having a plurality of cylinders, an air-intake passage and an exhaust gas recirculation loop, including a one-way valve positioned in either of said air-intake passage or said exhaust gas recirculation loop. The method then comprises operating one or more of the cylinders as a non-dedicated exhaust gas recirculating cylinder which non-dedicated exhaust gas cylinder(s) is in communication with said air-intake passage and operating one or more cylinders as a dedicated exhaust gas recirculating cylinder(s) wherein said operation provides exhaust gas output that is connected to said exhaust gas recirculation loop. The one way valve positioned in said air intake passage is operated to restrict the flow of exhaust gas from the exhaust gas recirculation loop into the air intake passage and the one-way valve positioned in said exhaust gas recirculation loop is operated to restrict the flow of air from said air intake passage into the exhaust gas recirculation loop.
The above-mentioned and other features of this invention and the manner of attaining them will become more apparent with reference to the following description of embodiments herein taking in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Preferred configurations of the present invention is provided in
One of the cylinders 34 is identified as a dedicated exhaust gas recirculating (D-EGR) cylinder. In other words, it may be understood that the exhaust gas 36 expelled from cylinder 34 may be directed (recirculated) back to the intake system 26 through an EGR feedback loop 38. The feedback loop 38 may therefore be understood as a pathway, preferably provided by piping, for the exhaust gas to travel on its way to the air and exhaust gas mixer 20. The exhaust gas from the three cylinders 28, 30, and 32 is directed to an exhaust system 40. It is noted that on a volume basis, 90% or more of the exhaust gas expelled from D-EGR cylinder 34 is recirculated into the engine intake system 26. More preferably 90-100% by volume of exhaust gas expelled from D-EGR cylinder 24 is recirculated, including all values therein, in 0.1% increments.
As can be seen, one way values may now be preferably located in the air inlet shown generally at 42 and/or in the EGR loop shown generally at 44, as shown in both
Accordingly, in the present invention, with the respect to the use of an engine configuration containing a D-EGR cylinder, the present invention is directed at the placement of a one-way valve in air intake passage for the engine, or a one-way valve in the EGR loop, or the combined use of such one-way valves to provide for more efficient engine operation.
Turning to one-way valve 42, it can now be appreciated that one preferred feature of a D-EGR engine is to re-introduce all of its high quality EGR gas (includes H2 and CO) from the D-EGR Cylinder(s) back into the engine intake via the EGR distribution mixer shown generally at 20. The relatively high quality EGR gas can then preferably provide engine efficiency benefits through burn rate, combustion stability, heat transfer, pumping work, and knock resistance improvements. However, it was recognized herein that the high quality EGR gas can also back flow into the engine intake passing through the turbocharger compressor and inhibiting the fresh air flow into the engine. As a result, compressor efficiency decreased leading to a reduced engine load and efficiency potential.
Via use of the one-way valve 42 positioned in the air intake passage, the exhaust gas backflow into the air intake passage mentioned above can be reduced or avoided. More specifically, the amount of exhaust gas backflow introduced into the air intake passage 18 is now preferably reduced herein to a level in the range of 0 to 100% by volume, more preferably 0 to 5.0% by volume, and even more preferably to the range of 0 to 2.5%, and in a highly preferred embodiment, to the range of 0 to 1.0% by volume. In addition, preferably, the one-way valve 42 herein is preferably a Reed one-way valve which is understood as a check valve to restrict the flow of fluids to a single direction.
Furthermore, the one-way valve 42 is also preferably positioned at a location that is in relative close proximity to that location where the exhaust gas is introduced to the air and exhaust gas mixer 20. That is, preferably, one-way valve 42 is positioned within 0 to 20.0 cm of the air and exhaust gas mixer 20, more preferably 0 to 10.0 cm, and even more preferably, 0 to 5.0 cm. It is noted that the air and exhaust gas mixer 20 may itself have a length in the range of 10.0 cm to 40.0 cm.
At least one benefit to the introduction of one-way valve 42 is now shown in
wherein ηc stands for compressor efficiency, Pout is compressor out pressure, Pin is compressor-in pressure, γ is the heat capacity ratio (heat capacity at constant pressure (Cp) to heat capacity at constant volume (Cv), which has a value of 1.4 for air, Tout is the compressor out temperature and Tin is the compressor in temperature. Such compressor efficiency was observed to be relatively higher at all identified levels of brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) for the engine, which is reference to the average (mean) pressure which, if imposed on the pistons uniformly from the top to the bottom of each power stroke, would produce the measured (brake) power output.
Furthermore, it can also be appreciated that a back flow of EGR gas (in the absence of one-way valve 42) will inhibit the induction of fresh air mass and therefore negatively impact the volumetric efficiency (VE) of the engine. The VE of the engine is reference to the ratio of the mass density of the air-fuel mixture drawn into the cylinder at atmospheric pressure (during the intake stroke) to the mass density of the same volume of air in the intake manifold. In accordance with the use of one-way valve 42, the volumetric efficiency of the D-EGR engine may be up to 5.0%.
Attention is next directed to one-way valve 44 as shown in
It can therefore now be appreciated that for D-EGR engine applications without the one-way valves disclosed herein, relatively fresh, compressed air was found to back flow into the D-EGR cylinder exhaust circuit instead of going straight into the intake manifold, compromising engine performance. This is especially true during those engine cycles where the D-EGR cylinder does not fire and expel its exhaust gases. As a result, the D-EGR cylinder exhaust process was found to be inhibited. However, in the broad context of the present invention, placement of one-way valve 44 in the EGR loop has now been found to reduce or eliminate the level of backflow of the relatively fresh compressed intake air into the EGR loop. More specifically, the amount of intake air backflow introduced into the EGR loop 38 is now preferably reduced herein to a level in the range of 0 to 10.0% by volume, more preferably 0 to 5.0% by volume, and even more preferably to the range of 0 to 2.5%, and in a highly preferred embodiment, to the range of 0 to 1.0% by volume.
Furthermore, the reduced high quality EGR led to a decrease in the aforementioned benefits of D-EGR such as heat transfer losses, combustion efficiency, burn rates, etc. Additionally, the increased D-EGR cylinder exhaust port pressures led to relatively poor scavenging which may result in up to 10% increased hot residual gasses and thus increased combustion instabilities (coefficient of variation (COV) of IMEP may decrease by up to 2 percentage points) as well as a decrease in knock resistance of this cylinder. The reduced knock resistance in the D-EGR cylinder may enable up to 5 crank angle degrees (CAD) combustion phasing advance.
Moreover, the increased D-EGR cylinder pumping work also magnifies the indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) balancing challenge with a D-EGR engine. Since the EGR cylinder is typically operated at D-Phi≥1.25, or in the range of 1.25 to 1.8, where D-Phi is the dedicated exhaust cylinder equivalence ratio, the IMEP decreases compared to the stoichiometric operated cylinders, leading to the IMEP imbalance as shown in
Finally, the use of both one-way valves 42 and 44 has shown to reduce the relatively large intake pressure fluctuations (without one-way valve: up to ±10 kPa, with one-way valve up to ±2 kPa) caused by constructive interference of back flowing D-EGR pulses with fresh air pulses. Such large intake pressure fluctuations can lead to the inability to efficiently utilize an intake manifold air pressure sensor (MAP), mass air flow sensor (MAF), or an intake oxygen sensor for engine control and diagnostic purposes. In addition, the reduced pressure fluctuations with the one-way valves are contemplated to enable a 0-50% smaller D-EGR mixer, and/or reduced D-EGR cylinder exhaust and intake plumbing by up to 50% since the large volumes (greater than 4 times the engine displacement) are no longer required for the pressure attenuation effect.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1563608 | Wood | Dec 1925 | A |
2113602 | Pratt | Apr 1938 | A |
3156162 | Wallace et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3228183 | Feller | Jan 1966 | A |
3303831 | Sherman | Feb 1967 | A |
3405679 | Norris et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3405697 | Marchand | Oct 1968 | A |
3680534 | Chavant | Aug 1972 | A |
3805752 | Cataldo | Apr 1974 | A |
3924576 | Siewert | Dec 1975 | A |
3941113 | Bauelin | Mar 1976 | A |
3958540 | Siewert | May 1976 | A |
3963000 | Kosaka et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4004554 | Kosaka et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4108114 | Kosaka et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4179892 | Heydrich | Dec 1979 | A |
4201180 | Iizuka | May 1980 | A |
4224912 | Tanaka | Sep 1980 | A |
4291535 | Goloff | Sep 1981 | A |
4350133 | Greiner | Sep 1982 | A |
4783966 | Aldrich | Nov 1988 | A |
4843821 | Paul et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5056314 | Paul et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5178119 | Gale | Jan 1993 | A |
5207714 | Hayashi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5257600 | Schechter et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297515 | Gale et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5343699 | McAlister | Sep 1994 | A |
5379728 | Cooke | Jan 1995 | A |
5456240 | Kanesaka | Oct 1995 | A |
5515814 | Cooke | May 1996 | A |
5517976 | Bachle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524582 | Suh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562085 | Kosuda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5806315 | Mui | Sep 1998 | A |
5847470 | Mitchell | Dec 1998 | A |
5894726 | Monnier | Apr 1999 | A |
6009709 | Bailey | Jan 2000 | A |
6138650 | Bailey | Oct 2000 | A |
6178956 | Steinmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216458 | Alger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6286489 | Bailey | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343594 | Koeslin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6425381 | Rammer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6478017 | Bianchi | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484702 | Riley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6536392 | Widener | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543230 | Schmid | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543411 | Raab et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6609374 | Feucht et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6655324 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672292 | Fischer | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6742507 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789531 | Remmels | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6820415 | Abet et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6871642 | Osterwald | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6877464 | Hitomi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6877492 | Osterwald | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6915776 | zur Loye et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918251 | Yanagisawa et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923149 | Nishimoto et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945235 | Bertilsson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7028680 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032578 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7140357 | Wei et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7168250 | Wei et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7232553 | Oh et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261064 | Bhaisora et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287378 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290504 | Lange | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7384620 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389770 | Bertilsson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7648785 | Hu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7721541 | Roberts, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7757677 | Dobrila | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779823 | Winstead | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801664 | Winstead | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7818959 | Hu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7945376 | Geyer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945377 | Van Nieuwstadt et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8100093 | Morgenstern | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8291891 | Alger, II et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311723 | McAlister | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8387593 | Ichihara et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8463529 | Hu | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8557458 | Scotto et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561599 | Gingrich et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8668752 | Scotto et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8695540 | Minick | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8752532 | Korenaga et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8838367 | McAlister | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8893687 | Gingrich et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904786 | Hayman | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8944034 | Gingrich et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966896 | Jacques et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9083020 | Scotto | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9091204 | McAlister | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9118048 | Scotto | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9140220 | Scotto | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145837 | Klingbeil | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9169773 | Bromberg et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178235 | Scotto et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9206769 | Burrahm | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9255560 | McAlister | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9297320 | Hilditch et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9328697 | Peters et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9377105 | McAlister | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9464584 | Gingrich et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9574487 | Gruber et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9611794 | Blythe et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9874193 | Gukelberger et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10125726 | Henry | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20010015193 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020189598 | Remmels | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030121484 | Wang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040074480 | Chen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099256 | Stewart | May 2004 | A1 |
20050016792 | Graefenstein | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022450 | Tan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060059896 | Liu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070587 | Bhalsora et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112940 | Roberts, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070028901 | Watakabe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070175215 | Rowells | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193270 | Roozenboom et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090120385 | Munshi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090199825 | Piper et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090308070 | Alger, II et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100024416 | Gladden | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100024417 | Pierpont | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100162994 | Elsa er | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110041495 | Yager | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120006288 | Winstead | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120078492 | Freund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090581 | De Almeida | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097138 | Keating | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120167863 | Kulkarni | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120204844 | Gingrich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204845 | Gingrich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216530 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130000320 | McKenna et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030672 | Klingbeil | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130133616 | Klingbeil | May 2013 | A1 |
20130216473 | Nicole et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130323145 | Tran et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140196697 | Burrahm | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140196702 | Gingrich et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140261322 | Geckler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331668 | Bidner et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331970 | Bidner et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150107227 | Carlsson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150337696 | Glugla | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150361927 | Glugla | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160017847 | Hilditch et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160076488 | Henry | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160237928 | Lana | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160245239 | Henry | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170363057 | Gukelberger et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2173555 | Oct 1973 | FR |
1378132 | Dec 1974 | GB |
2110791 | Nov 1982 | GB |
11247665 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2004278433 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-054605 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-336465 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2011099375 | May 2011 | JP |
2000071881 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2006052993 | May 2006 | WO |
WO-2010037540 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010146048 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (dated Oct. 2, 2006) issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/40483. (WO2006052993) (5 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability/Written Opinion (dated Oct. 2, 2006) issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/40483. (WO2006052993) (7 pgs). |
U.S. Office Action dated May 28, 2013 issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,901 (17 pgs.). |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2013 issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,901 (16 pgs.). |
U.S. Office Action dated May 21, 2014 issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,901 (15 pgs.). |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2013 issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,912 (6 pgs.). |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/631,384 (12 pgs). |
U.S. Office Action dated May 1, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/631,384 (13 pgs). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/631,384 (9 pgs). |
Caterpillar “Application and Installation Guide, Gas Engine Emissions”; © 2007 Caterpillar® (31 pgs). |
Duel Fuel™ Technology, Clean Air Power; “Dual-Fuel vs Spark Ignition”; <<http://www.cleanairpower.com/dualfuelvssparkignition.html>>; (2 pgs) (accessed Oct. 2, 2017). |
Hacarlioglu, et al; “Studies of the Methane Steam Reforming Reaction at High Pressure in a Ceramic Membrane Reactor”; Abstract only—accessed Sep. 15, 2015 <<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100399530660011X>>. |
Hankinson, et al; Ignition Energy and Ignition Probability of Methane-Hydrogen-Air Mixtures; accessed May 30, 2013 <<http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs/images/stories/papers/125.pdf>>. |
Saxena, et al; “The Influence of Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide on Structure and Burning Velocity of Methane Flames”; 2009 Fall Technical Meeting of the Western States Section of the Combusion Institute Hosted by the Univ of Cali at Irvine, CA, Oct. 26-27, 2009, Paper #09F-86, 20 pgs; accessed May 20, 2015 <<http://www.engr.ucr.edu/WSSCIConference/Exampleformat.pdf>>. |
Wu, H. et al., “Ni-Based Catalysts for Low Temperature Methane Stream Reforming: Recent Results on Ni-Au and Comparison with Other Bi-Metallic Systems”, Catalysts 2013, vol. 3, pp. 563-583. |
Zanfir, et al; Catalytic Combustion Assisted Methane Steam Reforming in a Catalytic Plate Reactor; Chemical Engineering Science vol. 58, pp. 3947-3960, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180223777 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |