Dedicated process diagnostic device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7630861
  • Patent Number
    7,630,861
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 25, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 8, 2009
    14 years ago
Abstract
A field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device is used for diagnosing operation of an industrial control or monitoring system. An input is configured to receive at least one process signal related to operation of the industrial process. A memory contains diagnostic program instructions configured to implement a diagnostic algorithm using the process signal. The diagnostic algorithm is specific to the industrial process. A microprocessor performs the diagnostic program instructions and responsively diagnoses operation of the process based upon the process signal.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present application is a Continuation-In-Part of and claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/801,073, filed Mar. 15, 2004, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/852,102, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,383, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, filed Feb. 25, 1999, abandoned which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143, application Ser. No. 09/852,102 is also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/383,828, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,654,697, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, filed Feb. 25, 1999 which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, filed Mar. 28, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The present invention relates to process control systems of the type used to monitor and/or control operation of industrial processes. More specifically, the present invention relates to diagnostics of such process control systems.


Field devices (devices such as process controllers, monitors and transmitters) are used in the process control industry to remotely control or sense a process variable. For example, a process variable may be transmitted to a control room by a transmitter for use in controlling the process or for providing information about process operation to a controller. For example, information related to pressure of process fluid may be transmitted to a control room and used to control the process, such as oil refining.


When a device used in industrial process fails, it is often necessary to shut down the entire process so that the failed device can be repaired or replaced. Typically, it is difficult to predict an impending failure of a process device prior to its occurrence. Thus, when the process device does fail, it occurs unexpectedly or with very little warning, and may require the unexpected shut down of the entire process. Although various attempts have been made at detecting and/or predicting a failure or impending failure, there is an ongoing need for such diagnostic techniques. Prior prediction of a pending failure allows the failing device to be replaced as desired prior to its ultimate failure.


SUMMARY

A field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device and method for use in diagnosing operation of an industrial control or monitoring system is provided. An input receives at least one process signal related to operation of the industrial process. A memory contains diagnostic program instructions configured to implement a diagnostic algorithm using the at least one process signal. The diagnostic algorithm may be specific to the industrial process in which the device or method is implemented. A microprocessor performs the diagnostic program instructions and responsively diagnoses operation of the process based upon the at least one process signal.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a process control system including a field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the field mounted diagnostic device.



FIG. 4 is a diagram of a field mounted diagnostic device used in conjunction with a heat exchanger.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides a dedicated process diagnostic device and method for use in diagnosing operation of an industrial process control or monitoring system. The dedicated process diagnostic device does not perform functions other than diagnostics in the process control system. In other words, the device is not used to measure a process variable used in performing or monitoring process control, and is also not used to control process operation. In some embodiments, in which the device is dedicated to performing diagnostics, its computational abilities can be substantially focused on this activity. The device can be configured to comply with requirements for mounting at a remote location in the field including intrinsic safety requirements and other requirements needed for the device to be “field hardened”.



FIG. 1 is a diagram of process control system 10 which includes dedicated field mounted diagnostic device 8. The process control system 10 also includes a transmitter 12 and a valve positioner 22 coupled to process pipe 16. A sensor 21 is shown generically in FIG. 1 and couples to transmitter 12. FIG. 1 also shows valve positioner 22 coupled to a control element 24 such as a valve. A process monitor 26 (illustrated as a hand held device) is also shown coupled to loop 18.


One typical technique for transmitting information involves controlling the amount of power flowing through a process control loop. Current is supplied from a current source in the control room and the transmitter controls the current from its location in the field. For example, a 4 mA signal can be used to indicate a zero reading and a 20 mA signal can be used to indicate a full scale reading. More recently, transmitters have employed digital circuitry which communicates with the control room using a digital signal which is superimposed onto the analog current signal flowing through the process control loop. One example of such a technique is the HART® communication protocol proposed by Rosemount Inc. The HART® protocol and other such protocols typically include a set of commands or instructions which can be sent to the transmitter to elicit a desired response, such as transmitter control or interrogation.


Fieldbus is a communications protocol proposed by the Fieldbus Foundation and is directed to defining a communications layer or protocol for transmitting information on a process control loop. In the Fieldbus protocol, the current flowing through the loop is not used to transmit an analog signal. Instead, all information is digitally transmitted. Further, the Fieldbus standard, and a standard known as Profibus, allow transmitters to be configured in a multi-drop configuration in which more than one transmitter is connected on the same process control loop. Other communication protocols include the MODBUS® protocol and Ethernet. In some configurations, two, three, four or any number of wires can be used to connect to the process device, including non-physical connections such as RF (radio frequency).


Diagnostic device 8, transmitter 12 and positioner 22 are coupled to a two-wire process control loop 18 which operates in accordance with the Fieldbus, Profibus or HART® standard. However, the invention is not limited to these standards or a two-wire configuration. Two-wire process control loop 18 runs between a location in the field and the control room 20. In an embodiment in which loop 18 operates in accordance with the HART® protocol, loop 18 can carry a current I which is representative of a sensed process variable. Additionally, the HART® protocol allows a digital signal to be superimposed on the current through loop 18 such that digital information can be sent to or received from transmitter 12. When operating in accordance with the Fieldbus standard, loop 18 carries digital signals and can be coupled to multiple field devices such as other transmitters. Any number of two wire process control loops 18 can be used and coupled to field mounted devices as appropriate. The configurations shown herein are for example purposes only.


Process variables are typically the primary variables which are being controlled in a process. As used herein, process variable means any variable which describes the condition of the process such as, for example, pressure, flow, temperature, product level, pH, turbidity, vibration, position, motor current, any other characteristic of the process, etc. Control signal means any signal (other than a process variable) which is used to control the process. For example, control signal means a desired process variable value (i.e. a setpoint) such as a desired temperature, pressure, flow, product level, pH or turbidity, etc., which is adjusted by a controller or used to control the process. Additionally, a control signal means, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, the signal which is provided to a control element such as a valve position signal which is provided to a valve actuator, an energy level which is provided to a heating element, a solenoid on/off signal, etc., or any other signal which relates to control of the process. A diagnostic signal as used herein includes information related to operation of devices and elements in the process control loop, but does not include process variables or control signals. For example, diagnostic signals include valve stem position, applied torque or force, actuator pressure, pressure of a pressurized gas used to actuate a valve, electrical voltage, current, power, resistance, capacitance, inductance, device temperature, stiction, friction, full on and off positions, travel, frequency, amplitude, spectrum and spectral components, stiffness, electric or magnetic field strength, duration, intensity, motion, electric motor back emf, motor current, loop related parameters (such as control loop resistance, voltage, or current), or any other parameter which may be detected or measured in the system. Furthermore, process signal means any signal which is related to the process or element in the process such as, for example, a process variable, a control signal or a diagnostic signal. Process devices include any device which forms part of or couples to a process control loop and is used in the control or monitoring of a process.


As discussed above, FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a process control system 10 which includes process piping 16 which carries a process fluid and two wire process control loop 18 carrying loop current I. Transmitter 12, controller 22 (which couples to a final control element in the loop such as an actuator, valve, a pump, motor or solenoid), process monitor 26 and control room 20 are all part of process control loop 18. It is understood that loop 18 is shown in one configuration and any appropriate process control loop may be used such as a 4-20 mA loop, 2, 3 or 4 wire loop, multi-drop loop and a loop operating in accordance with the HART®, Fieldbus or other digital or analog communication protocol. In operation, transmitter 12 senses a process variable such as flow using sensor 21 and transmits the sensed process variable over loop 18. The process variable may be received by controller/valve actuator 22, diagnostic device 8, control room equipment 20 and/or process monitor 26. Controller 22 is shown coupled to valve 24 and is capable of controlling the process by adjusting valve 24 thereby changing the flow in pipe 16. Controller 22 receives a control input over loop 18 from, for example, control room 20 or transmitter 12 and responsively adjusts valve 24. In another embodiment, controller 22 internally generates the control signal based upon process signals received over loop 18. Process devices include, for example, transmitter 12 (such as a 3051S transmitter available from Rosemount Inc.), controller 22, a handheld process monitor 26, diagnostic device 8 and control room 20 shown in FIG. 1. Another type of process device is a PC, programmable logic unit (PLC) or other computer coupled to the loop using appropriate I/O circuitry to allow monitoring, managing, and/or transmitting on the loop.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of field mounted dedicated diagnostic device 8. Device 8 is configured to couple to the process control system 10 of FIG. 1 and includes a process signal input 40 configured to receive one or more process signals from the process control system 10. A microprocessor 42 receives the process signals and is coupled to a memory 44. The memory 44 contains diagnostic program instructions configured to implement a diagnostic algorithm in the microprocessor 42. The diagnostic algorithm uses at least one process signal received by input 40 from the process. The diagnostic algorithm which is implemented in the microprocessor is specific to the particular process and configuration being monitored. For example, algorithms used to monitor operation of a process which controls level of process fluid in a tank may be different than the algorithm used to diagnose operation of a control system process which controls flow of process fluid through a pipe. Based upon the algorithm and this process signal, the microprocessor 42 provides some type of diagnostic output 46. The diagnostic output 46 can be an output used only internally by the device 8, or can be an output which is transmitted to a remote location, for example over the process control loop 18 shown in FIG. 1. Device 8 also includes a power supply 50 which, in some embodiments, is configured to receive power from the two wire process control loop 18 for completely powering all electrical components within device 8.


In general, the present invention offers a new class of field mountable process device which is used to monitor process conditions, detect process abnormalities and changes and provide diagnostics related to process operation and optimization. There is an ongoing need to increase the productivity, improve quality, lower costs and comply with regulations in industrial processes. Typical process devices do not have the computational ability to support the addition of complex diagnostics. This limitation is due to power constraints, and requirements for field hardening of the device to withstand hazardous locations and harsh environmental conditions. By using a dedicated device to perform diagnostics, the limited resources of the dedicated process diagnostic device can be focused on the single task of performing diagnostics and not required to perform other process related tasks. The dedicated device provides an operator functionality to monitor process conditions and signatures, trends, changes, upsets or other abnormalities which can be analyzed and used to troubleshoot system operation. The diagnostic information can then be communicated to a host system for use as appropriate, including a controlled plant shutdown. Further, by using a dedicated process device rather than a device located in the control room to implement diagnostics, the dedicated device has access to real time process information. In contrast, when equipment located at a remote location, such as the control room, is used to perform diagnostics, the diagnostic capabilities are limited because the remote equipment has limited access to process signals. For example, control room equipment has limited input/output capabilities, limited scan or update times, and limited bandwidth. Field hardening of the device allows operation in hazardous environments or in environments in which the device is subjected to a harsh conditions. Preferably, the device operates using sufficiently low power consumption to allow operation using power completely received from a two wire process control loop. However, in some embodiments, other configurations are used such as a four wire configuration. The memory 44 can be used to provide additional capabilities such as logging, trending, and analysis. The dedicated device 8 can also be used for testing diagnostic algorithms and techniques prior to adding such functionality to other process devices. The process signals used by device 8 can be received by monitoring transmissions on the process control loop. However, process signals can also be received through dedicated sensors directly coupled to the diagnostic device 8. The diagnostics performed by the device can be based on additional information, for example control information such as a setpoint, valve position, or the like, to perform higher level loop or device specific diagnostics. The device 8 can provide multiple types of diagnostic outputs, either individually or together, including annunciations, alarm signals, control signals, etc. Communication with the process device can be through the process control loop using standard communication techniques or can be through other techniques including wireless communications or using web connectivity.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example embodiment of a dedicated field mounted process diagnostic device 100. Device 100 generally includes input(s) 102, conversion circuit(s) 104, computational circuitry 106, application specific data 108 and output circuitry 110. Input(s) 102 can couple to any number of diagnostic sensors 112A, 112B . . . 112N. The sensors can be dedicated sensors which are directly coupled to device 100, or can be sensors coupled to device 100 through a databus such as a process control loop. The diagnostic variable sensors 112A-112N can measure any variable related to operation of the process or devices associated with the process. In the example of FIG. 3, diagnostic sensors are shown as providing pressure, temperature, flow, vibration or acoustic signals. The connection between the diagnostic sensors and the input block 102 of device 100 can be through a databus so that the sensors are located remotely, or through a direct connection. The databus can be any type of databus, for example, a two wire process control loop. Further, other types of databuses can be used such as a CAN bus, an SPI bus, etc. The conversion circuitry 104 is used as required to convert received process signals into a format suitable for use by computation circuitry 106. The computation circuitry 106 is illustrated as providing digital signal processing, fuzzy logic, neural networks or other computations. However, the circuitry can perform a desired form of a diagnostic computation. Application data 108 can be stored in a memory and can be set using an LOI (Local Operator Interface) or other technique to provide set application specific constants. For example, the data can be downloaded over a process control loop sent using a wireless communication link, configured using a web interface, or through the other techniques. Output circuitry 110 is illustrated as including a connection to the control room for providing digital, or analog signals. Examples include Fieldbus, HART®, analog data, digital data, contact closures or the like. A wireless communication output can also be provided. An optional acoustic transducer 116 is illustrated. The acoustic transducer 116 can be used to obtain additional diagnostic information, for example by applying a acoustic signal to a process component and observing the response through input circuitry 102.


The diagnostic device 100 is configured for a location in the field near the equipment or process that is being monitored for aberrant activity. The device 100 can be connected to existing process variable measurement devices, and/or other sensors that monitor other variables useful for performing a diagnostic function. The output of the diagnostic device 100 can be configured as desired. Example outputs include a local output to a handheld device such as a wireless or clip-on device. A visual indicator can also be provided, for example providing a color coded output with red indicating an alarm condition, yellow indicating a caution condition and green indicating nominal operation. The output can also be provided over an Internet connection, or through the connection to the control room. A Local Operation Interface (LOI) can also be provided for use in configuring the device and/or for providing a diagnostic output.



FIG. 4 is a simplified schematic diagram of a heat exchanger system 150 including a dedicated field mounted diagnostic device 152. System 150 includes heat exchanger 154 having an orifice plate 156, a primary flow input 158 and a counter flow 160. A flow measurement transmitter 162 is shown coupled across the orifice plate 156 and is configured to measure differential pressure, gage or absolute pressure and temperature. The output from transmitter 162 is received by diagnostic device 152. Additionally, transmitters 164 and 166 are illustrated as measuring gauging pressure along heat exchanger system 150. Field mounted diagnostic device 152 also monitors the gauge pressure measurement from transmitters 164 and 166. A two wire process control loop connection 168 is shown which couples diagnostic device 152 to a remote control room. During operation, the diagnostic device 152 can monitor the various process variables. For example, the differential pressure across the flow tubes in the heat exchanger can be monitored by observing the difference between the gauge pressures measured by transmitter 164 and transmitter 166. Given mass flow rate measured by transmitter 162, an expected differential pressure between gauges 164 and 166 can be calculated by diagnostic device 152. If the tubing within heat exchanger 154 becomes clogged, the expected differential pressure measured between transmitters 164 and 166 will deviate from the expected value. This can be used to trigger a diagnostic indication for local output, or transmission to the control room. Typically, the tubes within the heat exchanger 154 do not become plugged at the same rate. The gauge pressure measurement transmitters 164 and 166 can be used to measure pressures along the length of the exchanger tubing. Transmitters 164 and 166 can also be used to identify tubes that are plugging at a faster rate than others. This allows for maintenance to be correlated with the severity of the plugging. For example, a group of tubes which are completely plugged will cause a pressure drop across the entire heat exchanger tube group and may need immediate cleaning. On the other hand, an even build up among all of the tubing may cause the same pressure drop but may not require immediate attention.



FIG. 4 is one example embodiment and the present invention is applicable to all types of process control systems. Other examples include exchangers of all types, reactors, process overflow and leakage detection, cavitation sensing and/or prediction, corrosion monitoring, wear monitoring, identification of process operation which is outside particular limits, or other specialized applications.


The field mounted diagnostic device provides a co-located, dedicated diagnostic capability to determine whether abnormal conditions in the process exist, and if so, to what extent. The device can accept many types of sensor inputs and can be cognizant of information carried on the process control loop, such as setpoint information, to reduce inaccuracies in the diagnostics. The device can be configurable through sensor selection and software to accommodate many different types of diagnostic application requirements. The device is capable of local access and interrogation due to the co-location with the target system under diagnostic. Local output diagnostics can be used in physical observations of the system by an operator. The device need only monitor sensors and process variables required for the particular system which is being observed. The device can provide multiple outputs for viewing alarms and supporting of an appropriate level of detail as desired. Similar devices can be used for many different applications through the use of different software configurations. The device can be monitored over existing networks including communications through modems or the like. Preferably, the diagnostic device is physically hardened for field mounted applications. In such a configuration, the device should be able to withstand vibrations, caustic chemicals, electrostatic discharges, etc. for a particular installation. The output from the device can be in the form of a transmission to a remote location using wired or wireless techniques, a local output, outputs that support virtual web pages or transmission through the Internet, or other types of output. Any type of diagnostic technique can be used within the device including fuzzy logic techniques, neural network techniques, rule based techniques or the like. The device can also be configured to provide a particular input or stimulus to the process, such as through the application of an acoustic signal. Sensors within the device can monitor the response of components to the applied signal and the response can be used for the diagnostics performed by the device.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As used herein, “diagnostic sensors” are sensors which are dedicated to obtaining diagnostic measurements and are not used in controlling the process. Further, in some embodiments, program instructions which are performed by the microprocessor have the capability of learning operation of the monitored process by monitoring operation of the process.

Claims
  • 1. A field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device coupled to a process control loop for use in diagnosing operation of an industrial control or monitoring system of an industrial process, comprising: an input configured to receive at least one process signal related to operation of the industrial process from a diagnostic sensor;a memory in the field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device containing diagnostic program instructions configured to implement a plurality of diagnostic algorithms, using the at least one process signal and wherein the at least one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms is specific to the industrial process wherein the plurality of diagnostic algorithms include at least two diagnostic algorithms each of which are specific to different industrial processes;a selection input configured to receive diagnostic algorithm selection data indicative of a type of the industrial process and which identifies one of the at least two diagnostic algorithms and thereby selects a diagnostic algorithm; anda microprocessor configured to perform the diagnostic program instructions and responsively diagnose operation of the industrial process based upon the at least one process signal and the selected diagnostic algorithm.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the dedicated process diagnostic device is completely powered with power received over a two wire process control loop.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the process control loop comprises a 4-20 mA current loop.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the process control loop operates in accordance with the HART® Communication Standard.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the process control loop operates in accordance with the Fieldbus Communication Standard.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the input is configured to receive at least one input from a process variable sensor.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the process signal is received from the two wire process control loop.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the input is configured to receive a process signal from a diagnostic sensor directly coupled to the field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1 including a conversion circuit configured to convert the process signal to a format compatible with the microprocessor.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1 including an output configured to provide a wireless output.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1 including a visual output.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1 including a Local Operator Interface.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1 including an acoustic transducer.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the industrial process comprises a heat exchanger process and the diagnostic program instructions are specific to the heat exchanger process.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic program instructions are configured to learn operation of the process.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic sensor comprises a vibration sensor and wherein the diagnostic algorithm is specific to diagnosing operation of a heat exchanger.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the configuration input comprises a local operator interface.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the selection input comprises a wireless input.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the selection input is received through the process control loop.
  • 20. A method of diagnosing operation of an industrial control or monitoring system of an industrial process performed in a field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device, comprising: mounting the field device in a field of the industrial process;storing diagnostic program instructions in a memory which are configured to implement a plurality of diagnostic algorithms, at least one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms is specific to the industrial process and responsive to the process signal, wherein the plurality of diagnostic algorithms include at least two diagnostic algorithms each of which are specific to different industrial processes;receiving at least one process signal related to operation of the industrial process from a remote process device;receiving a selection input configured to receive diagnostic algorithm selection data indicative of a type of the industrial process and which identifies one of the at least two diagnostic algorithms and thereby selects a diagnostic algorithm;retrieving diagnostic program instructions from the memory located in the field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device which implement the selected diagnostic algorithm;diagnosing operation of the industrial process based upon the retrieved program instructions and the selected diagnostic algorithm;providing an output related to the diagnosing; andcompletely powering the field mountable dedicated diagnostic device with power received from a two wire process control loop.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the two wire process control loop comprises a 4-20 mA current loop.
  • 22. The method of claim 20 wherein the two wire process control loop operates in accordance with the HART® Communication Standard.
  • 23. The method of claim 20 wherein the two wire process control loop operates in accordance with the Fieldbus Communication Standard.
  • 24. The method of claim 20 wherein the at least one process signal comprises a process variable signal.
  • 25. The method of claim 20 including converting the process signal to a format compatible with a microprocessor.
  • 26. The method of claim 20 including providing a wireless output.
  • 27. The method of claim 20 including providing a visual output.
  • 28. The method of claim 20 including providing a Local Operator Interface.
  • 29. The method of claim 20 including receiving the process signal from an acoustic transducer.
  • 30. The method of claim 20 wherein the industrial process comprises a heat exchanger process and the diagnostic program instructions are specific to the heat exchanger process.
  • 31. The method of claim 20 wherein the diagnostic program instructions are configured to learn operation of the process.
  • 32. A field mountable diagnostic device for diagnosing operation of an industrial control or monitoring system of an industrial process, comprising: means for receiving at least one process signal related to operation of the industrial process from a remote process device;memory means located in the field mountable dedicated process diagnostic device for storing diagnostic program instructions in a memory which are configured to implement a plurality of diagnostic algorithms, at least one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms is specific to the industrial process and responsive to the process signal, wherein the plurality of diagnostic algorithms include at least two diagnostic algorithms each of which are specific to different industrial processes;means for receiving diagnostic algorithm selection data indicative of a type of the industrial process and which identifies one of the at least two diagnostic algorithms and thereby selecting a diagnostic algorithm;means for retrieving diagnostic program instructions which implement the at least one diagnostic algorithm;means for diagnosing operation of the industrial process based upon the retrieved program instructions and the selected diagnostic algorithm; andmeans for completely powering the field mountable dedicated diagnostic device with power received from a two wire process control loop.
US Referenced Citations (345)
Number Name Date Kind
3096434 King Jul 1963 A
3404264 Kugler Oct 1968 A
3468164 Sutherland Sep 1969 A
3590370 Fleischer Jun 1971 A
3618592 Stewart Nov 1971 A
3688190 Blum Aug 1972 A
3691842 Akeley Sep 1972 A
3701280 Stroman Oct 1972 A
3849637 Caruso et al. Nov 1974 A
3855858 Cushing Dec 1974 A
3948098 Richardson et al. Apr 1976 A
3952759 Ottenstein Apr 1976 A
3973184 Raber Aug 1976 A
RE29383 Gallatin et al. Sep 1977 E
4058975 Gilbert et al. Nov 1977 A
4083031 Pharo, Jr. Apr 1978 A
4099413 Ohte et al. Jul 1978 A
4102199 Talpouras Jul 1978 A
4122719 Carlson et al. Oct 1978 A
4249164 Tivy Feb 1981 A
4250490 Dahlke Feb 1981 A
4255964 Morison Mar 1981 A
4279013 Dahlke Jul 1981 A
4337516 Murphy et al. Jun 1982 A
4383443 Langdon May 1983 A
4390321 Langlois et al. Jun 1983 A
4399824 Davidson Aug 1983 A
4417312 Cronin et al. Nov 1983 A
4423634 Audenard et al. Jan 1984 A
4446741 Sirokorad et al. May 1984 A
4459858 Marsh Jul 1984 A
4463612 Thompson Aug 1984 A
4517468 Kemper et al. May 1985 A
4528869 Kubo et al. Jul 1985 A
4530234 Cullick et al. Jul 1985 A
4536753 Parker Aug 1985 A
4540468 Genco et al. Sep 1985 A
4571689 Hildebrand et al. Feb 1986 A
4630265 Sexton Dec 1986 A
4635214 Kasai et al. Jan 1987 A
4642782 Kemper et al. Feb 1987 A
4644479 Kemper et al. Feb 1987 A
4649515 Thompson et al. Mar 1987 A
4668473 Agarwal May 1987 A
4686638 Furuse Aug 1987 A
4696191 Claytor et al. Sep 1987 A
4705212 Miller et al. Nov 1987 A
4707796 Calabro et al. Nov 1987 A
4720806 Schippers et al. Jan 1988 A
4736367 Wroblewski et al. Apr 1988 A
4736763 Britton et al. Apr 1988 A
4758308 Carr Jul 1988 A
4777585 Kokawa et al. Oct 1988 A
4807151 Citron Feb 1989 A
4818994 Orth et al. Apr 1989 A
4831564 Suga May 1989 A
4841286 Kummer Jun 1989 A
4853693 Eaton-Williams Aug 1989 A
4866628 Natarajan Sep 1989 A
4873655 Kondraske Oct 1989 A
4907167 Skeirik Mar 1990 A
4924418 Backman et al. May 1990 A
4926364 Brotherton May 1990 A
4934196 Romano Jun 1990 A
4939753 Olson Jul 1990 A
4964125 Kim Oct 1990 A
4988990 Warrior Jan 1991 A
4992965 Holter et al. Feb 1991 A
5005142 Lipchak et al. Apr 1991 A
5019760 Chu et al. May 1991 A
5025344 Maly et al. Jun 1991 A
5043862 Takahashi et al. Aug 1991 A
5047990 Gafos et al. Sep 1991 A
5053815 Wendell Oct 1991 A
5057774 Verhelst et al. Oct 1991 A
5067099 McCown et al. Nov 1991 A
5081598 Bellows et al. Jan 1992 A
5089979 McEachern et al. Feb 1992 A
5089984 Struger et al. Feb 1992 A
5098197 Shepard et al. Mar 1992 A
5099436 McCown et al. Mar 1992 A
5103409 Shimizu et al. Apr 1992 A
5111531 Grayson et al. May 1992 A
5121467 Skeirik Jun 1992 A
5122794 Warrior Jun 1992 A
5122976 Bellows et al. Jun 1992 A
5130936 Sheppard et al. Jul 1992 A
5134574 Beaverstock et al. Jul 1992 A
5137370 McCullock et al. Aug 1992 A
5142612 Skeirik Aug 1992 A
5143452 Maxedon et al. Sep 1992 A
5148378 Shibayama et al. Sep 1992 A
5150289 Badavas Sep 1992 A
5167009 Skeirik Nov 1992 A
5175678 Frerichs et al. Dec 1992 A
5193143 Kaemmerer et al. Mar 1993 A
5197114 Skeirik Mar 1993 A
5197328 Fitzgerald Mar 1993 A
5212765 Skeirik May 1993 A
5214582 Gray May 1993 A
5216226 Miyoshi Jun 1993 A
5224203 Skeirik Jun 1993 A
5228780 Shepard et al. Jul 1993 A
5235527 Ogawa et al. Aug 1993 A
5265031 Malczewski Nov 1993 A
5265222 Nishiya et al. Nov 1993 A
5269311 Kirchner et al. Dec 1993 A
5274572 O'Neill et al. Dec 1993 A
5282131 Rudd et al. Jan 1994 A
5282261 Skeirik Jan 1994 A
5293585 Morita Mar 1994 A
5303181 Stockton Apr 1994 A
5305230 Matsumoto et al. Apr 1994 A
5311421 Nomura et al. May 1994 A
5317520 Castle May 1994 A
5327357 Feinstein et al. Jul 1994 A
5333240 Matsumoto et al. Jul 1994 A
5340271 Freeman et al. Aug 1994 A
5347843 Orr et al. Sep 1994 A
5349541 Alexandro, Jr. et al. Sep 1994 A
5357449 Oh Oct 1994 A
5361628 Marko et al. Nov 1994 A
5365423 Chand Nov 1994 A
5365787 Hernandez et al. Nov 1994 A
5367612 Bozich et al. Nov 1994 A
5369674 Yokose et al. Nov 1994 A
5384699 Levy et al. Jan 1995 A
5386373 Keeler et al. Jan 1995 A
5388465 Okaniwa et al. Feb 1995 A
5392293 Hsue Feb 1995 A
5394341 Kepner Feb 1995 A
5394543 Hill et al. Feb 1995 A
5404064 Mermelstein et al. Apr 1995 A
5408406 Mathur et al. Apr 1995 A
5408586 Skeirik Apr 1995 A
5410495 Ramamurthi Apr 1995 A
5414645 Hirano May 1995 A
5419197 Ogi et al. May 1995 A
5430642 Nakajima et al. Jul 1995 A
5434774 Seberger Jul 1995 A
5436705 Raj Jul 1995 A
5440478 Fisher et al. Aug 1995 A
5442639 Crowder et al. Aug 1995 A
5467355 Umeda et al. Nov 1995 A
5469070 Koluvek Nov 1995 A
5469156 Kogura Nov 1995 A
5469735 Watanabe Nov 1995 A
5469749 Shimada et al. Nov 1995 A
5481199 Anderson et al. Jan 1996 A
5481200 Voegele et al. Jan 1996 A
5483387 Bauhahn et al. Jan 1996 A
5485753 Burns et al. Jan 1996 A
5486996 Samad et al. Jan 1996 A
5488697 Kaemmerer et al. Jan 1996 A
5489831 Harris Feb 1996 A
5495769 Broden et al. Mar 1996 A
5510779 Maltby et al. Apr 1996 A
5511004 Dubost et al. Apr 1996 A
5526293 Mozumder et al. Jun 1996 A
5539638 Keeler et al. Jul 1996 A
5548528 Keeler et al. Aug 1996 A
5551306 Scarpa Sep 1996 A
5555190 Derby et al. Sep 1996 A
5560246 Bottinger et al. Oct 1996 A
5561599 Lu Oct 1996 A
5570034 Needham et al. Oct 1996 A
5570300 Henry et al. Oct 1996 A
5572420 Lu Nov 1996 A
5573032 Lenz et al. Nov 1996 A
5578763 Spencer et al. Nov 1996 A
5591922 Segeral et al. Jan 1997 A
5598521 Kilgore et al. Jan 1997 A
5600148 Cole et al. Feb 1997 A
5608650 McClendon et al. Mar 1997 A
5623605 Keshav et al. Apr 1997 A
5629870 Farag et al. May 1997 A
5633809 Wissenbach et al. May 1997 A
5637802 Frick et al. Jun 1997 A
5640491 Bhat et al. Jun 1997 A
5644240 Brugger Jul 1997 A
5654869 Ohi et al. Aug 1997 A
5661668 Yemini et al. Aug 1997 A
5665899 Willcox Sep 1997 A
5669713 Schwartz et al. Sep 1997 A
5671335 Davis et al. Sep 1997 A
5672247 Pangalos et al. Sep 1997 A
5675504 Serodes et al. Oct 1997 A
5675724 Beal et al. Oct 1997 A
5680109 Lowe et al. Oct 1997 A
5682317 Keeler et al. Oct 1997 A
5682476 Tapperson et al. Oct 1997 A
5700090 Eryurek Dec 1997 A
5703575 Kirpatrick Dec 1997 A
5704011 Hansen et al. Dec 1997 A
5705754 Keita et al. Jan 1998 A
5705978 Frick et al. Jan 1998 A
5708211 Jepson et al. Jan 1998 A
5708585 Kushion Jan 1998 A
5710370 Shanahan et al. Jan 1998 A
5710708 Wiegland Jan 1998 A
5713668 Lunghofer et al. Feb 1998 A
5719378 Jackson, Jr. et al. Feb 1998 A
5731522 Sittler Mar 1998 A
5736649 Kawasaki et al. Apr 1998 A
5741074 Wang et al. Apr 1998 A
5742845 Wagner Apr 1998 A
5746511 Eryurek et al. May 1998 A
5747701 Marsh et al. May 1998 A
5752008 Bowling May 1998 A
5764539 Rani Jun 1998 A
5764891 Warrior Jun 1998 A
5781024 Blomberg et al. Jul 1998 A
5781878 Mizoguchi et al. Jul 1998 A
5790413 Bartusiak et al. Aug 1998 A
5796006 Bellet et al. Aug 1998 A
5801689 Huntsman Sep 1998 A
5805442 Crater et al. Sep 1998 A
5817950 Wiklund et al. Oct 1998 A
5825664 Warrior et al. Oct 1998 A
5828567 Eryurek et al. Oct 1998 A
5829876 Schwartz et al. Nov 1998 A
5848383 Yuuns Dec 1998 A
5854993 Crichnik Dec 1998 A
5854994 Canada et al. Dec 1998 A
5859964 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5869772 Storer Feb 1999 A
5876122 Eryurek Mar 1999 A
5880376 Sai et al. Mar 1999 A
5887978 Lunghofer et al. Mar 1999 A
5908990 Cummings Jun 1999 A
5923557 Eidson Jul 1999 A
5924086 Mathur et al. Jul 1999 A
5926778 Pöppel Jul 1999 A
5934371 Bussear et al. Aug 1999 A
5936514 Anderson et al. Aug 1999 A
5940290 Dixon Aug 1999 A
5956663 Eryurek et al. Sep 1999 A
5970430 Burns et al. Oct 1999 A
5995910 Discenzo Nov 1999 A
6002952 Diab et al. Dec 1999 A
6006338 Longsdorf et al. Dec 1999 A
6014612 Larson et al. Jan 2000 A
6014902 Lewis et al. Jan 2000 A
6016523 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2000 A
6016706 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2000 A
6017143 Eryurek et al. Jan 2000 A
6023399 Kogure Feb 2000 A
6026352 Burns et al. Feb 2000 A
6038579 Sekine Mar 2000 A
6045260 Schwartz et al. Apr 2000 A
6046642 Brayton et al. Apr 2000 A
6047220 Eryurek et al. Apr 2000 A
6047222 Burns et al. Apr 2000 A
6052655 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2000 A
6061603 Papadopoulos et al. May 2000 A
6072150 Sheffer Jun 2000 A
6094600 Sharpe, Jr. et al. Jul 2000 A
6112131 Ghorashi et al. Aug 2000 A
6119047 Eryurek et al. Sep 2000 A
6119529 Di Marco et al. Sep 2000 A
6139180 Usher et al. Oct 2000 A
6151560 Jones Nov 2000 A
6179964 Begemann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182501 Furuse et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192281 Brown et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195591 Nixon et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199018 Quist et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209048 Wolff Mar 2001 B1
6236948 Eck et al. May 2001 B1
6237424 Salmasi et al. May 2001 B1
6260004 Hays et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263487 Stripf et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272438 Cunningham et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289735 Dister et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298377 Hartikainen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307483 Westfield et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311136 Henry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317701 Pyotsia et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327914 Dutton Dec 2001 B1
6347252 Behr et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356191 Kirkpatrick et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360277 Ruckley et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370448 Eryurek et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377859 Brown et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378364 Pelletier et al. Apr 2002 B1
6396426 Balard et al. May 2002 B1
6397114 Eryurek et al. May 2002 B1
6405099 Nagai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6425038 Sprecher Jul 2002 B1
6434504 Eryurek et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449574 Eryurek et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473656 Langels et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473710 Eryurek Oct 2002 B1
6480793 Martin Nov 2002 B1
6492921 Kunitani et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493689 Kotoulas et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497222 Bolz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6505517 Eryurek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519546 Eryurek et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532392 Eryurek et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539267 Eruyrek et al. Mar 2003 B1
6546814 Choe et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556145 Kirkpatrick et al. Apr 2003 B1
6564268 Davis et al. May 2003 B1
6567006 Lander et al. May 2003 B1
6594603 Eryurek et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597997 Tingley Jul 2003 B2
6601005 Eryurek et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611775 Coursolle et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615149 Wehrs Sep 2003 B1
6654697 Eryurek et al. Nov 2003 B1
6701274 Eryurek et al. Mar 2004 B1
6727812 Sauler et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738388 Stevenson et al. May 2004 B1
6751560 Tingley et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758168 Koskinen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6904476 Hedtke Jun 2005 B2
6915364 Christensen et al. Jul 2005 B1
7040179 Drahm et al. May 2006 B2
7058542 Hauhia et al. Jun 2006 B2
7099852 Unsworth et al. Aug 2006 B2
7109883 Trimble et al. Sep 2006 B2
7171281 Weber et al. Jan 2007 B2
7254518 Eryrurek et al. Aug 2007 B2
20020013629 Nixon et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032544 Reid et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020077711 Nixon Jun 2002 A1
20020108436 Albuaijan Aug 2002 A1
20020121910 Rome et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020145515 Snowbarger et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020145568 Winter Oct 2002 A1
20020148644 Schultz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194547 Christenson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030014536 Christensen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033040 Billings Feb 2003 A1
20030045962 Eryurek et al. Mar 2003 A1
20040078167 Tan et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093174 Lander May 2004 A1
20040128034 Lenker et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040199361 Lu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249583 Eryurek et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050072239 Longsdorf et al. Apr 2005 A1
20060075009 Lenz et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060277000 Wehrs Dec 2006 A1
20070010968 Longsdorf et al. Jan 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (111)
Number Date Country
999950 Nov 1976 CA
1185841 Jun 1998 CN
32 13 866 Oct 1983 DE
35 03 597 Jul 1986 DE
35 40 204 Sep 1986 DE
40 08 560 Sep 1990 DE
43 43 747 Jun 1994 DE
44 33 593 Jun 1995 DE
195 02 499 Aug 1996 DE
296 00 609 Mar 1997 DE
197 04 694 Aug 1997 DE
19930660 Jul 1999 DE
199 05 071 Aug 2000 DE
19905071 Aug 2000 DE
299 17 651 Dec 2000 DE
199 47 129 Apr 2001 DE
100 36 971 Feb 2002 DE
102 23 725 Apr 2003 DE
0 122 622 Oct 1984 EP
0 413 814 Feb 1991 EP
0 487 419 May 1992 EP
0 512 794 Nov 1992 EP
0 594 227 Apr 1994 EP
0 624 847 Nov 1994 EP
0 644 470 Mar 1995 EP
0 697 586 Feb 1996 EP
0 749 057 Dec 1996 EP
0 825 506 Jul 1997 EP
0 827 096 Sep 1997 EP
0 838 768 Sep 1997 EP
1 022 626 Oct 1997 EP
0 807 804 Nov 1997 EP
1 058 093 May 1999 EP
0 335 957 Nov 1999 EP
1 022 626 Jul 2000 EP
2 302 514 Sep 1976 FR
2 334 827 Jul 1977 FR
928704 Jun 1963 GB
1 534 280 Nov 1978 GB
1 534 288 Nov 1978 GB
2 310 346 Aug 1997 GB
2 317 969 Apr 1998 GB
2 342 453 Apr 2000 GB
2 347 232 Aug 2000 GB
56-031573 Mar 1981 JP
57196619 Feb 1982 JP
58-129316 Aug 1983 JP
59-116811 Jul 1984 JP
59-163520 Sep 1984 JP
59-176643 Oct 1984 JP
59-211196 Nov 1984 JP
59-211896 Nov 1984 JP
60-000507 Jan 1985 JP
60-76619 May 1985 JP
60-131495 Jul 1985 JP
60-174915 Sep 1985 JP
62-30915 Feb 1987 JP
62-080535 Apr 1987 JP
62-50901 Sep 1987 JP
63-169532 Jul 1988 JP
64-01914 Jan 1989 JP
64-72699 Mar 1989 JP
11-87430 Jul 1989 JP
2-05105 Jan 1990 JP
3-118424 May 1991 JP
3-229124 Oct 1991 JP
4-70906 Mar 1992 JP
5-122768 May 1993 JP
6-95882 Apr 1994 JP
06242192 Sep 1994 JP
06-248224 Oct 1994 JP
7-063586 Mar 1995 JP
07234988 Sep 1995 JP
8-054923 Feb 1996 JP
8-102241 Apr 1996 JP
08-114638 May 1996 JP
8-136386 May 1996 JP
8-166309 Jun 1996 JP
8-247076 Sep 1996 JP
8-313466 Nov 1996 JP
2712625 Oct 1997 JP
2712701 Oct 1997 JP
2753592 Mar 1998 JP
07225530 May 1998 JP
10-232170 Sep 1998 JP
11-083575 Mar 1999 JP
3139597 Dec 2000 JP
2190267 Sep 2002 RU
WO 9425933 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9523361 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9611389 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9612993 May 1996 WO
WO 9639617 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9721157 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9725603 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9806024 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9813677 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9814855 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9820469 May 1998 WO
WO 9839718 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9919782 Apr 1999 WO
WO 0041050 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0050851 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0055700 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0070531 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101213 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0119440 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0177766 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0190704 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0227418 Apr 2002 WO
WO 03081002 Oct 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070010968 A1 Jan 2007 US
Continuation in Parts (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 10801073 Mar 2004 US
Child 11440582 US
Parent 09852102 May 2001 US
Child 10801073 US
Parent 09257896 Feb 1999 US
Child 09852102 US
Parent 08623569 Mar 1996 US
Child 09257896 US
Parent 09383828 Aug 1999 US
Child 09852102 US
Parent 09257896 Feb 1999 US
Child 09383828 US
Parent 08623569 Mar 1996 US
Child 09257896 US