The invention relates to communication networks.
The following acronyms may appear in the description below: APON, asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) passive optical network (PON); ASIC, application-specific integrated circuit; ATM, asynchronous transfer mode; B-PON or BPON (broadband PON); CATV, community access television (cable television); CPU, central processing unit (e.g. microprocessor); EPON (Ethernet PON); FPGA, field-programmable gate array; ISDN, integrated services digital network; PON, passive optical network; POTS, plain old telephone service; PPV, pay per view; PSTN, public switched telephone network; RAM, random-access memory; ROM, read-only memory; TDM, time division multiplexed (or multiplexing); VoIP, voice over Internet Protocol; VoATM, voice over ATM; VoD, video on demand.
Optical access systems offer a potentially large bandwidth as compared to copper-based access systems. A broadband optical access system may be used, for example, to distribute a variety of broadband and narrowband communication services from a service provider's facility to a local distribution point and/or directly to the customer premises. These communication services may include telephone (e.g. POTS, VoIP, VoATM), data (e.g. ISDN, Ethernet), and/or video/audio (e.g. television, CATV, PPV, VoD) services.
The OLT may be implemented as a stand-alone unit or as a card in a backplane. The AccessMAX OLT card of Advanced Fibre Communications (Petaluma, Calif.) is one example of a superior OLT product. Other examples of OLTs include the 7340 line of OLTs of Alcatel (Paris, France), the FiberDrive OLT of Optical Solutions (Minneapolis, Minn.), and assemblies including the TK3721 EPON media access controller device of Teknovus, Inc. (Petaluma, Calif.). The OLT may communicate (e.g. via cable, bus, and/or data communications network (DCN)) with a management system or management entity, such as a network element operations system (NE-OpS), that manages the network and equipment.
On the user side, the OLT may be connected to one or more ODNs. An ODN provides one or more optical paths between an OLT and one or more ONUs. The ODN provides these paths over one or more optical fibres. The ODN may also include optional protection fibres (e.g. for backup in case of a break in a primary path).
An optical network unit (ONU) is connected to an ODN and provides (either directly or remotely) a user-side interface of the OAN. The ONU, which may serve as a subscriber terminal, may be located outside (e.g. on a utility pole) or inside a building. One or more network terminations (NTs) are connected to an ONU (e.g. via copper trace, wire, and/or cable) to provide user network interfaces (UNIs), e.g. for services such as Ethernet, video, and ATM. Implementations of such an architecture include arrangements commonly termed Fibre to the Building (FTTB), Fibre to the Curb (FTTC), and Fibre to the Cabinet (FTTCab).
The second architecture example in
The AccessMAX ONT 610 of Advanced Fibre Communications (Petaluma, Calif.) is one example of a superior ONT product. Other examples of ONTs include the Exxtenz ONT of Carrier Access Corporation (Boulder, Colo.), the FiberPath 400 and 500 lines of ONTs of Optical Solutions, the 7340 line of ONTs of Alcatel, and assemblies including the TK3701 device of Teknovus, Inc.
As shown in
An ODN that contains only passive components (e.g. fibre and optical splitters and/or combiners) may also be referred to as a passive optical network (PON). Depending e.g. on the particular protocol used, a PON may also be referred to, for example, as a B-PON (broadband PON), EPON (Ethernet PON), or APON (ATM PON). A OAN may include different OLTs and/or ONUs to handle different types of services (e.g. data transport, telephony, video), and/or a single OLT or ONU may handle more than one type of service. The OLT and/or one or more of the ONUs may be provided with battery backup (e.g. an uninterruptible power supply (UPS)) in case of mains power failure.
The protocol for communications between the OLT and the ONUs may be ATM-based (e.g. such that the OLT and ONUs provide transparent ATM transport service between the SNI and the UNIs over the PON), for example. Such embodiments of the invention may be applied to optical access systems that comply with one or more of ITU-T Recommendation G.983.1 (“Broadband optical access systems based on Passive Optical Networks (PON),” dated October 1998 and as corrected July 1999 and March 2002 and amended November 2001 and March 2003, along with Implementor's Guide of October 2003) (International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, CH), and ITU-T Recommendation G.983.2 (“ONT management and control interface [OMCI] specification for B-PON,” dated June 2002 and as amended March 2003, along with Implementor's Guide of April 2000) (International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, CH). Additional aspects of optical access systems to which embodiments of the invention may be applied are described in the aforementioned Recommendations.
In a PON architecture, communications may be conducted according to a standardized technology known as Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM). Communication using ATM is accomplished through the switching and routing of fixed-size packets of data referred to as cells. Although ATM networks are often used to provide high speed Internet access, ATM technology and protocols also allow for the converged transmission of voice, data and video traffic simultaneously over high bandwidth circuits at speeds in the range between 1.5 Mbps to 2.5 Gbps.
The convergence of multiple service types across a single media may require adequate traffic management to ensure that the quality of service (QoS) of each of the communications services can be met. Maintaining the requisite level of quality of service generates specific constraints due to the fact that communications services have different characteristics. Voice services, for example, are typically very time-sensitive, in that the information should not be delayed excessively and the delay should not have significant variations. Distortion of the voice may drastically impact the quality and/or interactivity of the communication. However, voice services may be relatively insensitive to loss. By contrast, video is typically relatively insensitive to delay as compared to voice but may be more sensitive to delay variations and loss. As for data traffic, it is typically not sensitive to delay or delay variation but may be very sensitive to loss.
In order to support different communications service requirements and to properly control network congestion (which may be unavoidable), an ATM network may provide a communications service according to one of several different service categories. These service categories may include constant bit rate (CBR); variable bit rate (VBR), whether real-time (rt-VBR) or non-real-time (nrt-VBR); available bit rate (ABR); and unspecified bit rate (UBR). Traffic transferred according to a CBR or VBR category may be subject to a contract in which the network service provider guarantees a certain level of service. Traffic transferred according to a UBR category, on the other hand, may be given the network service provider's “best effort” only after the CBR and VBR traffic has been serviced.
Because voice services have the most stringent QoS requirements, they generally use CBR or rt-VBR categories. However, maintaining a requisite level of QoS for voice services remains a challenging endeavor. Even when voice traffic is serviced in CBR and/or rt-VBR categories, voice QoS can be affected by other, higher bandwidth, real-time services that traverse the same network using the same service category, such as digital video or circuit emulation of leased lines. Because the throughput of these services may exceed that of the voice traffic by an order of magnitude or more, in some cases they may consume the allocated network resources and crowd out the voice traffic. A resulting degradation of voice traffic quality may be manifested as longer delay, larger CDV, and in some cases higher Cell Loss Ratio (CLR).
An optical communication system according to an embodiment of the invention includes an ATM switching fabric; and an optical distribution network configured to distribute data received from the ATM switching fabric among a plurality of subscribers, wherein the ATM switching fabric is configured to provide a plurality of service classes, at least one of the plurality of service classes being a dedicated service class for voice services.
A method for transmitting data in an optical communication network according to an embodiment of the invention includes prioritizing data according to a plurality of service classes; and transmitting the data over an optical distribution network to a plurality of subscribers, wherein the plurality of service classes includes a dedicated service class for voice services.
One solution for larger CDV and higher CLR in voice traffic would be to use larger jitter buffers and deeper queues for voice traffic. If the queue is deeper, it is less likely that cells will be dropped off at the end of the queue. However, larger jitter buffers and queues may also increase delay. Although increased delay can be partially solved by echo cancellation, this technique remains costly and may not completely address certain large delay calls.
Another potential solution to address these issues would be to support dedicated queues and buffers for each virtual circuit (VC) associated with each type of information (video, voice, etc.). Since each communications service would be routed to a distinct queue, it would be possible to provide adequate service differentiation and QoS control for every service type.
Embodiments of the invention include an APON or BPON network that is configured to ensure high QoS for voice services. In one embodiment of the invention, the APON network is configured to support a dedicated voice service class (called VCE-CBR) which is assigned a higher priority than other classes of services, such as, for example, CBR, VBR, ABR and UBR. In other embodiments of the invention, a separate queue is provided for the VCE-CBR class at each queuing point. Such embodiments may also support hierarchical arbitration as between the service classes, with e.g. the VCE-CBR class being serviced first. These principles may be implemented such that voice services only compete against one another, and it may be possible to provide service differentiation sufficient to maintain voice quality without adding excessively to the cost and complexity of the overall system. In a PON, the VCE-CBR service class may be supported at, e.g., the OLT and ONUs.
In an embodiment of the invention, the ATM switching fabric 105 is configured to support several service classes, which are classified according to specific attributes. The attributes of the service classes include bandwidth reservation, burstiness, delay sensitivity, CDV sensitivity and cell loss sensitivity. The burstiness is a commonly used measure of how constantly a source transmits traffic. A source that infrequently transmits traffic is deemed very bursty whereas a source that always sends data at the same rate is nonbursty. Table 1 summarizes an example of service classes supported by an access device or APON according to an embodiment of the invention.
In a guaranteed-bandwidth type of service, a bandwidth is entirely reserved and may be cyclically allocated in order to achieve a low cell transfer delay. Even if there is no data to be sent during a particular time period, cells containing idle traffic are sent for that period. By contrast, a “best effort” bandwidth indicates a bandwidth that is provided but there is no assurance or guarantee that such bandwidth will be available. In Table 1, voice communications have a dedicated service class such that all voice cells are serviced in the same class, i.e. the VCE-CBR class. Similarly to the traditional classes of service, the new VCE-CBR service class may be supported by the different components of the APON network.
Each of the service categories may be associated with parameters that describe a particular Quality of Service (QoS) and expected traffic characteristics. The traffic parameters may include parameters that specify the bandwidth guaranteed to the connection, such as the Peak Cell Rate (PCR) and Sustainable Cell Rate (SCR). The QoS parameters associated with a particular service category may include a specification of the acceptable cell loss rate (e.g., cell loss ratio, or “CLR”), and cell transfer delay characteristics (e.g., maximum cell transfer delay, or “CTD”). Using such parameters, a particular service category may support either real-time or non-real-time applications.
In operation, the incoming cell flow traffic from the network may be routed over a plurality of virtual circuits and virtual paths to a queue management unit of the ATM switching fabric. Each of these virtual circuits corresponds to a particular service, as shown in
In order to ensure QoS for all services, traffic control mechanisms can help achieve the requisite parameters that define expected traffic characteristics. These control mechanisms may use queuing methods, in which cells are queued up into the memory buffers of network devices (e.g. routers and switches) in order to properly control traffic congestion. A queue management method can address or reduce traffic congestion by dropping cells when necessary or appropriate. For example, a best effort cell may be discarded to free up network resources (perhaps for the benefit of another virtual circuit or service class).
Queuing methods include FIFO queuing where cells are arranged in a first-in first-out order such that the first cell in the queue is the first cell that is processed. Another type of queuing method includes class-based queuing (CBQ) in which a certain transmission rate is guaranteed. In CBQ, the cell traffic is divided into classes based, for example, on a combination of addresses, application type or protocol. Another queuing method includes priority queuing. In this model, cells that are not tolerant of delay can jump ahead of those that are more tolerant of delay. This model uses multiple queues, which are serviced with different levels of priority, with the highest priority queues being serviced first. An example of a priority queuing scheme is given in
With a separated queuing arrangement as shown in
It may be desirable that a per-class queuing scheme is implemented, as shown in
Prioritization of the cells among the queues may be done according to different types of schemes, e.g. a FIFO scheme, a strict priority scheme, a round-robin or “fair” scheme (e.g. to ensure that low-priority schemes are serviced), or a weighted variation of such a scheme. The arbitration scheme may vary over time e.g. according to changing traffic conditions.
Such prioritization may be done with an arbitration unit 205, which is configured to regulate cell traffic stream between the access device 101 and the plurality of ONTs and ONUs (e.g. according to one or more arbitration schemes as mentioned above). For example, arbitration unit 205 may provide hierarchical or strict arbitration as between the different service categories (e.g. VCE-CBR, CBR/rt-VBR, nrt-VBR, and UBR), with the VCE-CBR services being serviced first, the CBR/rt-VBR second, the nrt-VBR third and the UBR last (i.e. according to a class-based queuing mode). In that way it may be possible to provide a high quality of service for voice communications while maintaining differentiations between the remaining traditional classes of service.
It will be appreciated that a new voice-CBR service class as described herein may be implemented on downstream traffic (e.g. from OLT to ONU) and/or on upstream traffic (e.g. from ONU to OLT). Because certain CBR applications such as leased lines (e.g. T1) and video conferencing may be symmetrical in bandwidth, upstream voice traffic may also suffer competition for network resources as described herein. Furthermore, as the upstream traffic in a PON is typically restricted in bandwidth (e.g. four times less bandwidth) than the downstream traffic, in some cases the problem may even be worse for upstream voice traffic. Network architecture closer to the end user (e.g. at the ONT) may also be less distributed and/or differentiated than architecture at heavier traffic points, thus creating more opportunities for local resources to become temporarily monopolized by other services.
Upstream traffic on a PON may be routed, in an embodiment of the invention, via a unique arrangement of traffic containers (T-CONT). A T-CONT is a feature of the Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment (DBA) as specified by ITU-T G.983.4 (international Telecommunication Union, 2001). Multiple T-CONTs can be specified in one ONU/ONT. For example, the virtual channels and virtual paths from different classes may be grouped into several traffic containers (T-CONTS). ITU-T G.983.4 specifies five types of T-CONTs, which correspond to different service classes. T-CONT type 1 contains traffic sources corresponding to fixed bandwidths like CBR and rt-VBR, T-CONT type 2 can treat assured bandwidth, T-CONT type 3 covers assured bandwidth and non-assured bandwidth, T-CONT type 4 contains best-effort bandwidth, and T-CONT type 5 includes all types of bandwidth. In an embodiment of the invention, as shown in
It will be appreciated that embodiments of the invention may be applied as described herein such that voice communications only compete against each other. In such applications, the voice service is not affected by higher bandwidth services that may be carried under a similar class of service. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that such applications may avoid a need for per-virtual-circuit differentiation among voice communications, since voice traffic is typically of relatively very low bandwidth compared to other services. It is unlikely that voice traffic which is provided the highest priority for transport over an APON would suffer any significant delay or CDV due to other voice traffic.
It is expressly contemplated that alternative operations and/or configurations of such elements, and that apparatus including additional elements, are disclosed by and may be constructed according to the description provided herein. Embodiments of the invention may be applied at an OLT (e.g. to support downstream VCE-CBR), at an ONU (e.g. to support upstream VCE-CBR), or in both such devices connected via a PON.
The foregoing presentation of the described embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention as claimed may be practiced otherwise than as described. Various modifications to these embodiments are possible, and the generic principles presented herein may be applied to other embodiments as well.
An embodiment of the invention may be implemented in part or in whole as a hard-wired circuit (e.g. implemented on a computer interface card) and/or as a circuit configuration fabricated into one or more arrays of logic elements arranged sequentially and/or combinatorially and possibly clocked (e.g. one or more integrated circuits (e.g. ASIC(s)) or FPGAs). Likewise, an embodiment of the invention may be implemented in part or in whole as a firmware program loaded or fabricated into non-volatile storage (such as read-only memory or flash memory) as machine-readable code, such code being instructions executable by an array of logic elements such as a microprocessor or other digital signal processing unit.
Further, an embodiment of the invention may be implemented in part or in whole as a software program loaded as machine-readable code from or into a data storage medium (e.g. as shown in