Patent Application
20250189488
In one of its aspects, the present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus and methods for the non-destructive testing of ferrous objects embedded within a non-ferrous material and more particularly to the determination of the position, form, orientation, distance of rebar below the surface of the concrete (cover depth), and the diameter of carbon steel reinforcement embedded in concrete.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,509 discloses a method and apparatus for measuring the overlayer of a nonmagnetic material such as concrete and the diameter of steel reinforcement bars embedded therein. A steady state magnetic flux field is generated in the area of the concrete which is to be tested. A reinforcement bar embedded within the concrete generates a scattered field which is superimposed on the excitation field. By scanning the concrete surface, an amplitude locus is determined which is subtracted from an amplitude locus determined in the absence of ferromagnetic objects, whereby a difference locus is obtained. The concrete overlayer and the diameter of the steel reinforcement bar are determined from the location and magnitude of the maximum values of the difference locus with the aid of an evaluation computer.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,938 a transient electromagnetic or pulse induction type metal detecting apparatus having a receiving coil attached to a sensor, a method and apparatus is disclosed of determining a null point comprising determining a series of post transient output values for the sensor at predetermined times; forming a summation of the output values or their negatives; and altering the predetermined times so as to minimize the summation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,992 discloses a device for inspecting an object of electrically conductive material, in which a non-static-signal transmitter generates an electromagnetic field in the object, and a receiver measures the variations of the eddy current generated by the non-static electromagnetic field and produces a signal representing the decay of the eddy current. The non-static-signal transmitter is provided with at least two laterally spaced-apart emitters for emitting an electromagnetic field, which emitters are, during normal operation, so driven that the resulting electromagnetic field in the central region between the emitters is intensified.
United States Patent publication no. 2020/0124550 discloses, in order to characterize electrically conducting and/or ferromagnetic objects, such as rebars, in concrete, a device that is rolled along a surface of the sample. The device comprises e.g., two rows of partially overlapping sending coils and receiving coils. Each pair of attributed sending and receiving coils is designed to have reduced mutual impedance in the absence of any electrically conducting and/or ferromagnetic object. The complex value, e.g., the phase and absolute value, of the mutual impedances are measured in order to determine a number of parameters (size, position and coverage of the object with concrete) of the objects.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,339,023 discloses a measuring apparatus which accurately locates reinforcing bars in underwater concrete structures such as piers, retaining walls, easements and the like and measures the amount of concrete covering each reinforcing bar. The measuring apparatus includes a probe which generates a magnetic field, and which is moved over the surface of the underwater concrete structure under test. When the poles of the magnetic field are in parallel alignment with and directly over a reinforcing bar within the structure a disturbance occurs in the magnetic field with the magnitude of the disturbance being indicative of the depth of concrete covering the reinforcing bar. An electronics module electrically coupled to the probe provides an analog output signal which is indicative of the distance between a reinforcing bar within the concrete structure under test and the probe. This analog signal is supplied to a meter which provides a visual indication of the location of the reinforcing bar and a microprocessor which then calculates the depth of the reinforcing bar within the concrete structure.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,446,379 discloses a system for searching and sensing reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete is provided. The system comprises a means for magnetizing the reinforcing steel in the reinforced concrete with lines of magnetic force generated by a magnetic field and a means for sensing the lines of magnetic force radiated from the magnetized reinforcing steel to detect an existence and a condition of the reinforcing steel in the reinforced concrete. The sensing means includes a coil for sensing a magnetic force and the magnetizing means is positioned remote from the sensing means.
Reinforced concrete is a heterogeneous material in which concrete is cast around a network of reinforcing members, such as steel reinforcement known as rebar. This can be done for a variety of reasons, as concrete without reinforcement does not tend to bear or endure tensile stresses that could lead to cracking. In certain situations, the rebar is vulnerable to corrosion during its lifetime in use and these products of corrosion have a relatively larger volume than the uncorroded steel. The accumulation of these corrosion products and resulting expansion of the rebar volume may eventually lead to cracking, spalling or delamination of the concrete. In addition to compromising the integrity of the structure, the exposing of the rebar accelerates the propensity of the environment to further degrade the rebar. Therefore, it is desirable for owners and users of reinforced concrete structures to have information pertaining to the corrosion status of the embedded rebar. A variety of screening systems and methods are currently known to obtain rebar corrosion information.
Visual inspection methods are a common and relatively simple method of identifying corrosion. Under this technique a worker simply visually inspects the exterior surface of the reinforced concrete structure for signs of corrosion such as cracking, spalling or delamination. These visual inspection methods can only locate corrosion/damage that has progressed to the stage where the external, visible portions of the concrete structure are showing damage, which can mean that a significant level of damage has occurred before it is detected and/or detectable.
Destructive coring is another known method used to identify corrosion. In this method holes are drilled into the reinforced concrete structure in order to either visually inspect portions of the interior of the concrete structure, including the visible portions of the embedded rebar and/or to obtain a sample of the concrete, rebar materials and/or corrosion products for analysis. However, coring methods of this type cause damage to the concrete structure when used. This can limit the frequency of coring testing and can have some detrimental effects on the aesthetics and/or mechanical properties of the concrete structure.
Owners and users of reinforced concrete structures can also use the known, half-cell potential method (ASTN C876-15 standard) for screening rebar for corrosion, which provides a probability of whether corrosion is taking place. This technique works by measuring the corrosion or open circuit potential of the steel bar and compares this measured value to a reference benchmark potential. This method requires a direct electrical connection between the instrument and the steel rebar which may necessitate a hole to be drilled into the concrete structure. Additionally, the ohmic resistance of the concrete can vary based, for example, on the moisture content in the concrete at any given time, which may be a source of significant error in the measurements taken using this method. Also, this method generally does not provide information about the corrosion rate. Additionally, this method provides no information on the amount of material loss that may have occurred.
A variety of other electrochemical means are also used to identify corrosion including potentiostatic polarization, galvanostatic pulse, potentiodynamic linear polarization resistance, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, but each have limitations.
Ground-penetrating radar is another known method of rebar detection. These systems send a high frequency (>10 MHZ) electromagnetic wave at a target and record the time of flight in the material to compute rebar characteristics.
Electromagnetic-based inspection technologies are also used to identify corrosion in rebar. A benefit of electromagnetic systems is that they are generally relatively insensitive to the material properties of concrete itself and other non-metallic materials that may be embedded in the concrete. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,509 describes the use of an electromagnetic probe as a means of detection and sizing of rebar diameters. This probe uses a single coil wrapped around a ferrite yoke to direct a magnetic field across the perpendicular cross-section of rebar and a hall-effect sensor is used to measure changes in the magnetic field resulting from the presence of rebar and changes in cover depth.
Current (conventional) eddy current systems such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,339,023 and 5,446,379 apply one or several harmonic voltages to a coil to generate a time-varying magnetic field within the metallic test-piece. This magnetic field induces eddy currents in nearby electrical conductors, which weakens the source magnetic field. This weakening of the source magnetic field results in a measurable voltage signal in a nearby pickup coil, which contains information about the electrical, magnetic, and geometrical properties of the test-piece.
However, existing systems and methods of rebar detection in concrete or other non-metallic matrix materials, including those described herein, tend to suffer from a number of drawbacks which can limit their utility.
In particular, with visual inspection methods the corrosion must have reached a certain threshold before the visual signs begin to manifest. Moreover, the visual inspection method is very labor intensive, and the quality of the inspection will vary depending on the inspector and their particular disposition, experience, judgement and/or skill. Moreover, visual inspection methods generally do not provide quantifiable information pertaining to the extent of corrosion or the rebar cover depth.
While the destructive coring method may provide information pertaining to the corrosion rate and cover depth, the destructive coring method is labor, time, and capital intensive, may weaken the structure being drilled into, and provides a spatial resolution that is practically limited by the number and location of the holes drilled.
Known electrochemical methods of rebar detection have limited spatial resolution, are relatively time-intensive, and generally require skilled labour to operate. Current electrochemical-based inspection techniques cannot provide any information on the remaining rebar.
In ground-penetrating radar systems the speed of the electromagnetic wave is proportionate to the moisture content of the concrete which can lead to significant errors in the estimated cover depth as the moisture content is both unknown and constantly changing.
Conventional eddy current systems employing one or more frequencies of excitation, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,339,023 and 5,446,379 suffer from two fundamental main weaknesses as an inspection technique: (1) The strength of induced eddy currents may decay exponentially within the depth of the conductive test-piece and is inversely proportionate to the frequency of excitation and (2) Non-desirable signal artefacts may occur due to variation in the relative positioning and orientation of the probe relative to the test piece.
In contrast, Pulsed Eddy Current Testing (PET) fundamentally differs from conventional eddy current testing due to the coils being excited by a voltage pulse rather than a harmonic voltage. According to the Fourier transform, any signal, including the voltage pulse train may be expressed as a series of sinusoidal components. This means that the voltage train applied to the PET probe intrinsically contains a spectrum of frequencies, allowing a simultaneous interrogation of the test-piece at these different frequencies. Due to the skin effect, each frequency of excitation has a different sensitivity to the inspection parameters. This means that the resulting PET signal expressed in terms of time represents the summation of all these frequency components, which themselves contain a substantial amount of information about the test-piece that could be achieved through conventional eddy current methods.
The teachings herein describe a new type of pulsed eddy current probe that can optionally be utilized for the simultaneous and relatively rapid measurement of rebar diameter and cover depth to help overcome at least some of the limitations of existing electrochemical techniques and existing eddy current systems.
The teachings described herein relate to the application of Faraday's law of induction by generating a magnetic field from one or two coils of wire carrying an electric current and imposing this source magnetic field into nearby conductors, which in the examples illustrated herein is a rebar that is buried in concrete, but could be used on other conductors in other applications. The magnetic poles of the transmit coils are preferably anti-aligned as described in the exemplary embodiments herein such that a magnetic circuit can be established in a suitable yoke structure that can support the magnetic fields, such as a C-shaped yoke and any ferromagnetic object that is axially aligned with the yoke. By Lenz's law, the rebar (or other magnetic object) may establish an opposing magnetic field to the source field through the generation of eddy currents in the rebar. In addition to weakening the source field, this secondary field can induce a voltage signal in one or two receive coils that are included as part of the systems and apparatuses described herein. Optionally, a plastic wear plate, or other suitable wear protection structure that does not materially interfere with the magnetic fields, can be positioned beneath the four coils on the measurement apparatus to help protect the yoke and coils from coming into direct contact with, and being damaged by, the relatively rough surface of the concrete during an inspection without materially interfering with the desired measurements. This approach may help facilitate the simultaneous and relatively rapid measurement of one or both of rebar diameter (which can also be referred to as a cross-sectional area) and cover depth, thereby helping to overcome at least some of the limitations of the existing electrochemical techniques.
Optionally, the methods and techniques described herein can be used in conjunction with a generally portable, and preferably hand-held detection apparatus. The portable detection, or a similar non-portable apparatus can include a suitable yoke/electromagnetic coupler, transmitter(s) and receiver(s), signal generator, power source, controller and the like, and can be configured to perform the methods described herein. Providing a portable detection apparatus of this nature may allow a user to move the detection apparatus across the surface of an object that is being examined (such as a floor or wall with embedded rebar) and can allow the user to determine the condition of a number of different rebars within a given structure. For example, a user may use a portable apparatus to scan the surface of a structure using multiple detection passes and by moving the apparatus relative to the surface when taking readings. Each reading taken may provide information about a specific, local section of rebar that is within proximity to the detection apparatus, and by taking multiple readings at different locations more information about the status of the structure/object can be obtained.
Providing a portable detection apparatus may also allow the same apparatus to be used to inspect multiple different objects or structures, as the user may transport the detection apparatus to various different locations when testing is appropriate.
Alternatively, instead of being configured as a portable apparatus, embodiments of the teachings herein can include detection apparatuses that are intended to be stationary, and optionally that can be attached to or embedded within the object or structure that is to be monitored. For example, at least some of the hardware components described herein (such as the coils and yoke) could be glued or otherwise adhered to the surface of an object that is to be monitored, such as being stuck to the surface of a wall, floor or ceiling, to monitor the condition of a rebar within the structure (such as a road, bridge, building or the like). While the detection range of the apparatuses may be generally limited to the section of the rebar that is in a given detection zone or region, i.e. between the transmitter and receiver (e.g. the portion that is generally parallel to the yoke), that section of the rebar could be monitored at any desired frequency, such as hourly, daily, every 2-3 days, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually or the like. The fixed detection apparatuses may be connected to a suitable signal generator and processing unit using a physical connection (such as wires) or via a wireless connection (such as WiFi, cellular, Bluetooth or the like) which may allow the response signals to be transmitted to a location that is remote from where the transmitter and receiver coils are located . . .
In addition to the suitable signal generator and processing unit, the fixed detection apparatuses may also be connected to a suitable power source, such as electricity from the electrical grid if available at the given location, solar panels, wind turbines or batteries.
Optionally, some portions of the detection apparatus may be fixed in location, such as the probe components used to create the electromagnetic circuit (e.g., the transmitter, receiver, yoke and related components), while other portions of the detection apparatus may be removable, such as the signal generator and processing unit. In such arrangements, the removable portions (e.g. signal generator and processing unit) can be brought to the location of the fixed components when a reading is desired, and can be removed during the time between readings—for example to keep the relatively sensitive electrical components protected from the environmental conditions, and/or to allow a common signal generator and processing unit to be used in conjunction with multiple different sets of be fixed electromagnetic circuit components.
For example, a common controller (for example, containing the signal generator and processing unit) could be transported to the location of various different fixed components and connected to take a reading at each location. The portable controller unit could include the power supply so that the local, fixed probe components are powered when connected to the controller and are not powered when the controller is removed, for example.
The readings taken at the same location, but at different times may be used provide information about the instantaneous condition of the rebar when each interrogation was performed, and/or may be compared with each other to provide insight into the rate of change of the properties of the rebar or other analogous trends. Fixing the detection apparatus/probe relative to the object may help facilitate such trend-type monitoring as the user can be relatively confident that the same section of rebar is being interrogated each time and that the apparatus in the same orientation relative to the rebar.
Optionally, a detection system can include two or more detection apparatuses/probes that are connected to a common structure for monitoring purposes. For example, several detectors may be positioned along the length of a rebar that is embedded with a wall or floor and can be axially spaced apart from each other so that they can detect the properties of different sections of the rebar. Together, the readings from the different apparatuses may give local information about the condition of the rebar and/or their readings may be combined to provide an overall determination of the condition of the rebar.
In accordance with one broad aspect of the teachings described herein, there is provided a system for non-destructively monitoring at least a first attribute of an elongate, target object extending along an object axis and being disposed within a non-magnetic structure. The system may include an input signal generator configured to generate pulsed voltage electrical signals. A first probe may be coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the target object at a first detection region. The first probe may include an electromagnetic coupler extending in a coupler direction between first and second coupler ends. The first and second coupler ends may be positioned adjacent the non-magnetic structure and the coupler direction being generally aligned with the object axis. The first probe may include a first transmitter connected to the electromagnetic coupler and configured to generate first pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signals based on the pulsed voltage electrical signals, and a first receiver connected to the electromagnetic coupler and spaced apart from the first transmitter. The target object, the electromagnetic coupler, the first transmitter and the first receiver may form an electromagnetic circuit. The first transmitter may be configured to introduce each first pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal through the non-magnetic structure and along the electromagnetic circuit and the first receiver is configured to receive a response electromagnetic signal that is induced in the target object and to generate a corresponding response electrical signal comprising time information and voltage information. A processing structure may be configured to, for each response electrical signal to:
The processing structure may include a response signal processor configured to:
The response signal processor may be further configured to compare the one of the first attribute and the first output signal, to the stored value for the first detection region to determine if the condition is met.
The input signal generator and the response signal processor may be housed within a controller unit. The processing structure may include one or more computing devices in communication with the response signal processor. The one or more computing devices may be configured to:
The processing structure may be configured to generate a status signal based on the comparing.
The input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals automatically according to a pre-arranged schedule, a frequency, or a period. The input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals according to a user input.
The stored value may be a predefined threshold value.
The processing structure may be further configured to store each first attribute of the target object at the first detection region. The stored value may be a previously-stored first attribute of the target object at the first detection region. The previously-stored first attribute of the target object at the first detection region may be an initial first attribute of the target object at the first detection region. The previously-stored first attribute of the target object at the first detection region may be an immediately previous first attribute of the target object at the first detection region.
The processing structure may be configured to, for each first attribute of the target object:
The condition may be met if:
The first probe may be affixed to a surface of the non-magnetic structure. The electromagnetic coupler may comprise:
The first probe may be encapsulated within the non-magnetic structure.
The system may also include:
The processing structure may be further configured to, for each second response electrical signal:
The system may further comprise second processing structure configured to, for each second response electrical signal:
The first probe and the second probe may be configured to be operated simultaneously, such that the first probe and the second probe generate the first output signal and the second output signal simultaneously.
The system may also include:
The processing structure may be further configured to, for each second response electrical signal:
The system may further comprise second processing structure configured to, for each second response electrical signal:
The first probe and the second probe may be configured to be operated simultaneously, such that the first probe and the second probe generate the first output signal and the second output signal simultaneously.
The system may also include a third probe coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the target object at a third detection region. The third detection region may be spaced along the object axis from the first detection region. The third probe may include a third electromagnetic coupler extending in a third coupler direction between first and second coupler ends, the first and second coupler ends being positioned adjacent the non-magnetic structure. Third coupler direction may be generally aligned with the object axis. The third probe may include a third transmitter connected to the third electromagnetic coupler and configured to generate third pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signals based on the pulsed voltage electrical signals. The third probe may include a third receiver connected to the third electromagnetic coupler and spaced apart from the third transmitter. The target object, the third electromagnetic coupler, the third transmitter and the third second receiver may form a third electromagnetic circuit. The third transmitter may be configured to introduce each third pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal through the non-magnetic structure and along the third electromagnetic circuit and the third receiver may be configured to receive a third response electromagnetic signal that is induced in the target object and to generate a corresponding third response electrical signal comprising time information and voltage information. A fourth probe may be coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the second target object at a fourth detection region, the fourth detection region being spaced along the second object axis from the second detection region. The fourth probe may include a fourth electromagnetic coupler extending in a fourth coupler direction between first and second coupler ends, the first and second coupler ends being positioned adjacent the non-magnetic structure and the fourth coupler direction being generally aligned with the second object axis. The fourth probe may include a fourth transmitter connected to the fourth electromagnetic coupler and configured to generate fourth pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signals based on the pulsed voltage electrical signals. The fourth probe may include a fourth receiver connected to the fourth electromagnetic coupler and spaced apart from the fourth transmitter. The second target object, the fourth electromagnetic coupler, the fourth transmitter and the fourth receiver may form a fourth electromagnetic circuit. The fourth transmitter may be configured to introduce each fourth pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal through the non-magnetic structure and along the fourth electromagnetic circuit and the fourth receiver may be configured to receive a response fourth electromagnetic signal that is induced in the second target object and to generate a fourth corresponding response electrical signal comprising time information and voltage information.
The processing structure may be further configured to:
The processing structure may be configured to generate a status signal if the condition is met for any one of the first detection region, the second detection region, the third detection region and the fourth detection region.
The first probe, the second probe, the third probe and fourth probe may be arranged in grid or a geometric array relative to the non-magnetic structure.
The first probe, the second probe, the third probe and the fourth probe may be configured to be operated simultaneously, such that the first probe, the second probe, the third probe and the fourth probe generate the first output signal, the second output signal, the third output signal and the fourth output signal simultaneously.
In accordance with another broad aspect of the teachings described herein, there is provided a method for non-destructively monitoring a first attribute of a ferrous rebar, such as ferrous rebar or other elongate object that is compatible with the electromagnetic fields described here, that is within a non-magnetic structure and extends along a bar axis using a first probe coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the ferrous rebar at a first detection region, the first probe comprising
The method may further comprise generating a status signal based on the comparing.
The input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals automatically according to a pre-arranged schedule, a frequency, or a period. The input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals according to a user input.
The stored value may be a predefined threshold value.
The method may further comprise:
The previously-stored first attribute of the ferrous rebar at the first detection region may be an initial first attribute of the ferrous rebar at the first detection region.
The previously-stored first attribute of the ferrous rebar at the first detection region may be an immediately previous first attribute of the ferrous rebar at the first detection region.
The comparing may further comprise:
The condition may be met if:
The first attribute may correspond to the cross-sectional area of the ferrous rebar, and wherein determining the first attribute comprises determining a rate of change/slope of a voltage of the response electrical signal with respect to time and comparing the rate of change to a predetermined data set. Determining the rate of change may comprise determining a slope (in dB/s) of a plot of the amplitude of the logarithm of the voltage of the response electrical signal (dB) with respect to time(s) and comparing the slope to predetermined calibration slope values associated with corresponding rebar areas.
The determining the cross-sectional area may further comprise determining an amplitude of the voltage of the response electrical signal and comparing the amplitude to the predetermined data set.
The first attribute may correspond to the cover depth of the ferrous rebar, and wherein determining the first attribute comprises determining an amplitude of a logarithm of a voltage of the response electrical signal and comparing the amplitude to a predetermined data set. Determining the amplitude of the logarithm of a voltage of the response electrical signal may comprise determining a y-intercept of a plot of the amplitude of the logarithm of the voltage of the response electrical signal (dB) with respect to time(s) and comparing the y-intercept to predetermined calibration y-intercept values associated with corresponding cover depths.
Determining the cover depth may further comprise determining a rate of change/slope of a voltage of the response electrical signal with respect to time and comparing the rate of change to the predetermined data set.
The method may further include:
Successive time intervals may define a monitoring period for the first probe at the first detection region. The method may further comprise:
The method may further comprise:
The method may further comprise using a second probe coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the ferrous rebar at a second detection region, the second detection region being spaced along the bar axis from the first detection region, the second probe comprising
The second pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal and the pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal are introduced simultaneously.
The method may further comprise non-destructively monitoring the first attribute of a second ferrous rebar that is within the non-magnetic structure and extends along a second bar axis using a second probe coupled to the non-magnetic structure and located proximate the second ferrous rebar at a second detection region, the second probe comprising
The second pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal and the pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal may be introduced simultaneously.
Other advantages of the present teachings may become apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the present specification.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like parts, and in which:
Various apparatuses or processes will be described below to provide an example of an embodiment of each claimed invention. No embodiment described below limits any claimed invention and any claimed invention may cover processes or apparatuses that differ from those described below. The claimed inventions are not limited to apparatuses or processes having all of the features of any one apparatus or process described below or to features common to multiple or all of the apparatuses described below. It is possible that an apparatus or process described below is not an embodiment of any claimed invention. Any invention disclosed in an apparatus or process described below that is not claimed in this document may be the subject matter of another protective instrument, for example, a continuing patent application, and the applicants, inventors or owners do not intend to abandon, disclaim, or dedicate to the public any such invention by its disclosure in this document.
In this example, the probe 100 includes an input signal generator, in the form of a pulsed eddy current generator 119, that is configured to generate a pulsed voltage electrical signal when the probe 100 is in use. The pulsed eddy current generator 119 can be connected to the other functional parts of the probe 100 using any suitable wires or other such connection.
An electromagnetic coupler in this example includes a yoke 109 that extends along a yoke axis 130 that also defines (and is parallel to) a coupler direction, between first and second coupler ends 132 and 134 that are axially spaced apart from each other. The yoke 109 is positionable proximate the non-magnetic structure that is to be measured/tested, illustrated as the non-ferrous concrete material 117 in this example. Optionally, at least some portions of the yoke 109 may also be configured to be graspable by a user so that the user can hold and manipulate the probe 100 when it is in use. More preferably, the probe 100 is configured (as illustrated in this example) to be a hand-held type of apparatus that can be grasped by one or two hands and that can be carried and moved by the user over and/or along the surface 111 to take the measurements as described herein. To help facilitate this, the yoke 109 in this example includes a grip portion 136 that is a portion of a main or central body portion of the yoke 109 and is axially spaced between the first and second ends 132 and 134, and the transmit and receive coils thereon. In this arrangement, the grip portion 136 includes the electromagnetically conductive material of the yoke 109 that can carry the electromagnetic flux 113 and forms part of the electromagnetic circuit of the probe 100. In other arrangements, a grip portion may be separate from the flux-carrying portion of the probe 100 and may be formed from a different material and/or located at a different position relative to the rest of the probe 100.
Preferably, the coupler/yoke 109 is shaped so that the electromagnetic circuit (e.g. flux lines 113) has a generally U or C-shaped configuration as shown in the illustrated examples (and see also
A portion of a ferrous target object, in the form of a section of steel rebar 115 is shown as being positioned within the concrete structure 117 in this schematic example. The rebar 115 extends along, and defines an object or bar axis 140, has a width 142 or diameter in a direction that is orthogonal to the axis 140 and is located at a cover depth 144 below the surface 111 of the concrete structure 117.
The probe 100 in this example includes first and second transmitters in the form of a transmit coils 101 and 105 that are located at the first and second ends 132 and 134, respectively, that are connected to the electromagnetic coupler and that can be used to generate respective first and second pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signals based on the pulsed voltage electrical signal received from the pulsed eddy current generator 119. As described herein, the pulsed eddy current generator 119 can be used to activate the transmit coil 101, the transmit coil 105 or optionally both transmit coils 101 and 105 simultaneously. While two transmitters are shown in this example, in other examples of the probes described herein the probe may include only one transmitter, such as transmit coil 101.
Similarly, in this example the probe 100 includes first and second receivers that are connected to an electromagnetic coupler that is provided in the form of the yoke 109 and are spaced apart from their associated transmitter, so that the first receiver is spaced from the first transmitter and the second receiver is spaced from the second transmitter. In this example, the first and second receivers include the receive coils 103 and 107 that are located at the first and second ends 132 and 134 of the yoke 109. In this arrangement, the receive coil 107 is associated with, and spaced from, transmit coil 101, and receive coil 103 is associated with and spaced from transmit coil 105.
In the example illustrated in
In this illustrated configuration, when the first and second coupler ends 132 and 134 are positioned adjacent the non-magnetic structure 117 and the coupler direction 130 is generally aligned with the object axis 140 (as shown in
First transmit coil 101 includes a coil of electrically conductive wire which, when it receives the pulsed signal from the signal generator 119 will produce a corresponding pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal through the non-magnetic structure 117 and along the electromagnetic circuit (e.g. flux lines 113) and the receive coil 107 includes a coil of electrically conductive wire that will receive a response electromagnetic signal that is induced in the target object 115 and will generate a corresponding response electrical signal that will include preferably both time information and voltage information.
The probe 100 also includes a suitable response signal processor, such as the processing unit 121 illustrated schematically in
In this embodiment, the probe 100 is configured so that a magnetic circuit, shown using schematic flux lines 113, is established between transmit coils 101 and 105, ferromagnetic yoke 109, receive coils 103 and 107, and rebar 115 embedded in a non-ferrous material 117. Wear plate 111 physically separates transmit coils 101 and 105, ferromagnetic yoke 109, and receive coils 103 and 107 from the non-ferrous material 117 in order to protect coils 101, 105, 103, and 107 from the rough surface of the non-ferrous material 117 during a scan. A pulsed eddy current generator 119 is electrically coupled to transmit coils 101 and 105 and receive coils 103 and 107. In the illustrated embodiment the non-ferrous material is concrete. In other embodiments it could be other non-ferrous materials such as wood, cement, glass, dirt or plastic. In the illustrated embodiment the rebar 115 is comprised of carbon-steel. In other examples the rebar is comprised of iron or nickel or materials with both the product of relative permeability and conductivity within 2 orders of magnitude of carbon steel.
Pulsed eddy current generator 119 generates a pulsed voltage waveform that is applied to transmit coils 101 and 105. Preferably, the pulsed voltage waveform is a square voltage waveform or approximates a square voltage transform as the optimal configuration is to establish—for a short period of time—a constant magnetic circuit on the ON pulse and then subsequently observe the system response when the pulse is OFF. Pulsed eddy current generator 119 is further configured to receive and record a response signal from receive coils 103 and 107. This response signal will include time information and voltage information. Transmit coils 101 and 105 generate a pulsed magnetic field based on the pulsed voltage waveform supplied by pulsed eddy current generator 119.
Ferromagnetic yoke 109 directs the magnetic field from transmit coils 101 and 105 into the non-ferrous material 117 completing the magnetic circuit 113 between the transmit coils 101 and 105 and the sections of rebar 115 that are axially aligned, or at least generally aligned (e.g., +/−40 deg) with the probe. In general, the ferromagnetic yoke 109 can have a number of different geometries.
When the pulsed voltage waveform is on, a voltage will form across the transmit coils 101 and 105 as illustrated in
The pulse train can, in some examples, be defined by the amplitude, frequency and pulse width. A pulse with a relatively larger amplitude can provide a relatively larger received signal, and therefore can be useful to help overcome noise in the system. In some of the examples described herein about 20V was sent through these coils. However, providing the system with a pulse having too large an amplitude (e.g., above a pre-determined use threshold) could, in some examples, cause the transmitter coils to get hotter than is desired. In general, an appropriate amplitude for the pulse should be chosen to help provide a sufficiently high signal to noise ratio in the receive coils that can be achieved by the pulser instrumentation without causing excessive heating in the transmit coils that would compromise the practical use of the apparatus.
The frequency of the pulse is preferably selected so that is it long enough to allow the signal voltage to decay before the next pulse is applied. For example, a frequency can be selected that would allow at least 80 ms for the voltage to decay before the next pulse.
A relatively smaller/lower frequency (i.e., less pulses per unit of time) may help allow the user to get more of a decay trace to analyze, at the expense of less measurements. Preferably, the frequency of the pulse train should allow for an ample period of time for the voltage signal to decay between pulses while ensuring a practical number of measurements are taken based on the requirements of the inspection.
The pulse width is understood to mean the duration in which the pulse is “ON”, which may affect the heating of the transmitter coils etc. The pulse width is preferably selected so that it can allow sufficient for the signal to decay, however.
Optionally, the probes described herein can be configured to be operable in two or more different operating modes, in which different ones of the coils, or combinations of the transmit and receive coils are selectively activated. Operating different ones of the coils may change how the electromagnetic signals are generated and/or received, which may help facilitate the measurement of different features or aspects of the target object. For example, the deep electromagnetic rebar probe may be operated in a full transmit-receive mode in which both transmit coil 101 and transmit coil 105 are simultaneously triggered to generate the magnetic field in the buried rebar 115, and both receive coils 103 and 107 are in use. Optionally, the deep electromagnetic rebar probe may also be operable in one or more partially energized modes, which can be referred to here as solenoid modes, in which only one of the transmit coils 101 and 105 are in use at a time. For example, the deep electromagnetic rebar probe can be operable in a first solenoid mode in which only transmit coil 101 is energized to generate a magnetic field in the buried rebar 115, and therefore receive coil 107 is used to pick up the response signal, and/or may also be operable in a second solenoid mode in which only transmit coil 105 is energized to generate a magnetic field in the buried rebar 115, and therefore receive coil 103 is used to pick up the response signal.
When operating in a full transmit-receive mode the deep electromagnetic rebar probe may provide a relatively more accurate measurement of the bulk corrosion of the target rebar that is beneath the probe, as compared to modes in which only one transmit coil is used. This may be due to the transmit coils 101 and 105 having their magnetic fields anti-aligned to generate a magnetic circuit that remains stable in the presence of localized rebar corrosion. In this embodiment the two transmit coils 101 and 105 can optionally be configured to create an equal but opposite magnetic polarity. This can be done either by physically turning one of the coils upside down or interchanging the positive and negative leads of one of the coils. This embodiment of the deep electromagnetic rebar probe can be referred to as operating in a full transmit-receive mode.
Both receive coil 103 and receive coil 107 are each configured to receive a response signal. In some embodiments, or in some modes, only one of receive coils 103 and 107 may be used. In other embodiments the established voltage each of receive coils 103 and 107 may be added together which may confer the benefit of providing a relatively improved signal to noise ratio.
It has also been discovered that operating the probe 100 in either of the solenoid modes described above can change the nature of the electromagnetic field that is generated and the signals that are then received via the probe 100. It has also been discovered that recognizing the differences in the electromagnetic field that is generated and the signals that are then received via the probe 100 can be advantageously used, in some circumstances, to help a user/operator identify the presence of additional objects in the structure 117 that may be in proximity to the target object/rebar by recognizing the differences in the fields, and for example, that alternating between different ones of the operating modes may help a use identify the presence and location of rebar junctions within the structure 117 (e.g. locations where two or more rebars cross each other within the concrete). Therefore, in some embodiments of the methods and systems described herein, during the inspection the probe may be configured to cycle through one, two or three different modes of operation, these modes being: (1) both transmit coils 101 and 105 being triggered (full transmit-receive mode), (2) only transmit coil 101 being triggered (one solenoid mode), and (3) only transmit coil 105 being triggered (a second solenoid mode). This embodiment may confer the advantages of both of the two previously described embodiments. The changing of the operating modes may be done manually by a user or may be automatically triggered by a system controller or other suitable control mechanism.
Referring also to
As illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Testing was conducted based on the schematics in
For example,
From observing these experimental results, the person skilled in the art can hence infer the relative depths and positions of multiple rebar sections in a complex structure of multiple rebar junctions or overlaid intersections.
Having demonstrated that the probes described herein can be used to locate the intersection of two rebars (or other suitable target objects), the teachings herein can also relate to a method of locating the intersection of two elongate, magnetic target objects (such as rebars) within a non-magnetic structure or surrounding matrix material.
As referred to herein, the diffusion time constant can be computed by observing the voltage of the signal response. The diffusion time constant can then be used to compute the radius of the uncorroded rebar that is encased in a halo of corrosion products. This results from the fact that a pulsed Eddy current signal will exponentially decay over time. In the case of a cylindrical scatterer such as rebar, this diffusion time constant T for the decay of this signal is given as:
τ∝μσR2
The diffusion time constant and thus the voltage signal response of the pulsed eddy current will therefore be directly related by the radius R of the uncorroded rebar that is encased in a halo of corrosion products, the product of the conductivity σ and permeability μ of the uncorroded steel. The presence of corrosion products will generally have a relatively small impact on the overall response measure by the system. This may be because their relative permeability and conductivity is much smaller than uncorroded steel rebar.
Having received the response electromagnetic signal and generated the response electrical signal the method 800 can include the step, at 807, of determining at least one of the cover depth and the cross-sectional area of the first ferrous rebar based on the time information and the voltage information in the response electrical signal, and preferably then generating a corresponding first output signal using a response signal processor (as described herein). The method can then include, at step 809, providing at least a first user output based on the output signal using a user output module so that a user of the probe will be presented with information about the condition of the target object in a meaningful manner. For example, the user output can provide information that corresponds to at least one of the cover depth and the cross-sectional area of the first ferrous rebar. The user outputs may be any suitable type of output such as a light, sound, computer display, numerical value (such as a depth measurement value in mm or the like and/or a bar cross-sectional area or diameter value alert), graph, haptic feedback and the like. For example, the user outputs may provide values and/or quantitative information to the user, such as the “rebar diameter is X mm”, or may provide qualitative information, such as showing a green light if the diameter of the rebar falls within a predetermined acceptable range and showing a yellow or red light if the diameter is outside pre-determined, acceptable parameters.
When performing an inspection, it is suggested that the operator sweeps the probe when the probe is in full transmit-receive mode to detect the rebar. The probe is relatively insensitive to rebar that is perpendicular to the probe axis, and therefore the maximal signal strength that is achieved/measured when rotating the probe relative to the structure after the initial detection of a target object may be detected when the probe axis is substantially aligned with the object axis. This relation may help allow a user to identify the orientation of the buried rebar. The operator/user may then perform a raster scan in the vicinity of the rebar along the structure of the non-ferrous material. As the probe is highly insensitive to rebar perpendicular to the probe axis, this probe design allows for an accurate measurement at rebar meshes.
Prior to performing an inspection, it is preferable to calibrate the instrument, and it may be necessary in some instances in order to obtain a meaningful measurement. Calibration can, in some examples, entail collecting the voltage response of the instrument/probe to a number of machined rebar samples to a known radius and at a fixed distance beneath the probe.
To perform the calibration the rebar sample 705 can be placed into one of the plurality of rebar perforations 703, each of which are located at a known or measurable distance below the instrument mounting surface 701. The instrument/probe is then placed on the instrument mounting surface 701 and axially aligned with the rebar sample 705. One or more measurements can then be taken using the instrument/probe. This process can then be repeated using different rebar samples, having different diameters and/or other properties, and rebar samples can be placed in different ones of the rebar perforations 703 that are at different distances from the instrument mounting surface 701.
The voltage response of the instrument/probe to the rebar sample 705 and a variety of other rebar samples of different diameters located in different ones of the rebar perforations 703, and at different cover depths is then measured to generate a calibration dataset. A two-dimensional polynomial fit can then be applied to the calibration dataset to map and/or cross-reference the time information and the voltage information contained in the dataset to the associated, known cover depth and effective diameter information. In one embodiment of the two-dimensional polynomial fit time information and voltage information are used as independent variables and either the rebar diameter or the cover depth is used as the dependent variable.
The calibration dataset can then be fed into or otherwise accessed by an information processing unit 121 (
In this illustrated embodiment, transmit coils 1101 and 1105, receive coils 1103 and 1107, and ferromagnetic yoke 1109 each have a substantially rectangular cross-sectional geometry. In other embodiments of a deep electromagnetic rebar probe the associated transmit coils, receive coils, and/or ferromagnetic yoke may have a different cross-sectional shape and may include, for example, a circular or elliptical cross-sectional geometry. In general, the shape of the cross-sectional area is arbitrary and may be configured differently in different embodiments of the teachings described herein.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Preferentially, if a wear plate such as plate 1160 is used the transmit coils 1101 and 1105 and the receive coils 1103 and 1107 are configured to extend to the surface of the wear plate 1160 as this may enhance the sensitivity of the measurements.
An alternative, and possibly less-optimal design for the probes may include placing the coils in different places along the ferromagnetic yoke 109 or 1109, rather than at the ends as shown in the illustrated embodiments.
In the illustrated embodiment, the transmit coils 1101 and 1105 abut and surround the ferromagnetic yoke 1109, and the receive coils 1103 and 1107 surround the transmit coils 1103 and 1105. In this arrangement, the transmitters (e.g., the transmit coils 1101 and 1105) are partially nested within the receivers (e.g. the receive coils 1103 and 1107), as a lower portion of the transmit coils 1101 and 1105 are laterally surrounded by the receive coils 1103 and 1107. Optionally, substantially all of the transmit coils can be contained by and nested within the receive coils, for example as shown schematically in
Preferentially the operator of the probe will align the probe (e.g., 100 or 1100) so that the axis formed between the two transmit/receive coil pairs is at least substantially parallel to the axis of the rebar sample being examined. This may help increase the accuracy and/or reliability of the measurements. However, in practice, perfect alignment is generally not required in order to obtain measurements that are reliable enough to provide useful information to a user. For example,
As described above, some embodiments of the probe 100 can be configured for use as a portable detection apparatus. Alternatively, the features of the probe 100 can be incorporated into other embodiments in which the probe(s) 100 is part of a static monitoring/instrumentation system, and preferably where the system includes two or more such probes positioned to monitor different locations on a common structure and/or target object.
Referring, for example, to
In this example, each probe 100 is analogous to the probes 100 described above and includes a pair of transmit coils 101 and 105 and a pair of receiver coils 103 and 107 arranged as described herein relative to respective yokes 109. The probes 100 are arranged in this example so that their yoke axis 130 that defines their coupler direction is substantially parallel to the axis 140 of the rebar 115 the probe is associated with and the probes 100 are axially spaced from each other by a probe spacing distance 176. The spacing distance 176 can be any suitable distance that is compatible with the configuration of the structure 202 that is to be monitored and may be between about 6″ and 20 feet or more, and may be about 1 foot, 2 feet, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 feet or more. In the example shown, the probes 100 are arranged across the structure 202 as a grid but may alternatively be arranged across the structure 202 in another geometric array, such as a non-orthogonal periodic pattern (for example, an array having triangular or hexagonal symmetry, and the like). However, while shown as being generally the same for all the probes 100 illustrated in
The length 170 of the generally axially extending portion of the yoke 109 defines a probe length in the axial direction, and when the probes 100 are positioned adjacent the object 202 each probe 100 will overlie a respective section of the rebar 115, which can be described as respective detection region 172. In this arrangement, each probe 100 is operable to determine the properties of its respective detection region 172 along the rebar 115, including the width 142 or diameter in a direction that is orthogonal to the axis 140 and the cover depth 144 below the surface 111. The length 170 of the probes 100 may vary in different embodiments and may be any suitable length based on the structure to be monitored. Shortening the length 170 of the probe 100 will shorten the size of the associated detection region 172 but extending the length 170 too long (such as extending the probe 100 to span the entire length of the rebar 115) may impede the operation of the probe 100 and make it difficult or impossible to obtain useful readings of localized corrosion. Accordingly, the length 170 may be selected to be between about 1″ and about 24″, and preferably may between about 2″ and about 12″, and may be about 3″, 4″, 5″, 6″, 7″, 9″, 10″, 11″, 12″ or more in some examples. In embodiments where the probe 100 is intended to be hand carryable and a user is to grasp the yoke 109 there may be a minimum practical length 170 that is at least partially dictated by the size of a user's hand, whereas in the system 200 the probes 100 need not take a user's hand size into account and the length 170 in the static probes 100 may be less than the length 170 of a portable probe 100.
To provide the pulsed electrical input signals to the transmit coils 101 and 105, and to receive the response signals from the receiver coils 103 and 107, the system 200 can include any suitable system controller, including the controller 178 that is schematically illustrated in
Positioning the controller 178 remotely from the probes 100 themselves may allow the controller 178 to be located in a position that is relatively easier for a user to access, and that may be protected from exposure to the ambient environment, such as in a control room or other sheltered location adjacent the structure 202, while the probes 100 themselves can be located in harder to access regions, such as the underside of a road deck on a bridge, etc. Using this system 200, the user does not necessarily need to be able to physically access each probe 100 in order to make a suitable reading.
When the system 200 is activated, or at least some of the probes 100 in the system are activated, each activated probe 100 can establish its own respective magnetic circuit, shown using schematic flux lines 113, that includes its transmit coils 101 and 105, ferromagnetic yoke 109, receive coils 103 and 107, and associated detection region 172 of the rebar 115 embedded in a non-ferrous material 117. As shown in
In addition to the signal data and data about the condition of the rebar 115, the system 200 (via the controller 178 or other mechanism) can also include data about the physical location of each probe 100 on the structure 202 and relative to other probes 100, which may be used to help interpret the sensed rebar properties. For example, the position data may be used to help determine which locations on the rebar 115 or overall structure 202 have suffered the most corrosion or degradation which may help guide repair and inspection efforts.
When the system 200 is in use, the controller 178 can be configured to initiate readings using the probes 100 during a detection phase that can occur on a desired, pre-arranged schedule or frequency. For example, the system 200 can be configured to initiate a detection phase and take readings at spaced time intervals, such as once a month, and to record one or both of the rebar width 142 and the cover depth 144 associated with each detection region 172, and/or transmit the data to a remote system (such as the remote computing device 181) for further processing. Some or all of the probes 100 may be configured to be operated simultaneously, such that some probes 100 or every probe 100 generates a respective output signal simultaneously. The successive, spaced time intervals define a monitoring period over which the system 200 can be operated. The rebar width 142 and cover depth 144 readings may optionally be compared to pre-determined threshold or alarm values, and alerts or other system outputs can be generated by the controller 178 if the rebar width 142 or cover depth 144 values fall below predetermined threshold values. Alternatively, or in addition to absolute values comparisons, the controller 172 may be configured to determine a percent change and/or rate of change of either the rebar width 142 or cover depth 144 values when compared to previous readings obtained from the same detection region 172. Alerts may be generated if either of the rebar width 142 or cover depth 144 values have changed more than a predetermined amount between reading (e.g. more than a 5% reduction since the last reading) and/or if the current value has reached a predetermined decrease from an initial or reference value (e.g. the width 142 has reduced to only 75% of its initial value). Other data processing and alert functions are also possible. Alternatively, instead the system 200 can be triggered on-demand by a user rather than on an automatic schedule.
When the system 200 is operated over the monitoring period as defined by the successive time intervals, the processing structure (such as the remote computing device 181) can be further configured to determine a relationship in any of the output signal, the rebar width 142, and the cover depth 144, as a function of time over the monitoring period for a given detection region and/or a give probe 100. The relationship may be, for example, a statistical trend, a graphical relationship, a mathematical relationship, and the like, for any of the output signal, the rebar width 142, and the cover depth 144, as a function of time. As will be appreciated, determining such a trend advantageously allows future values of the output signal, the rebar width 142, and/or the cover depth 144 to be predicted, and can be used for example to calculate a time until failure, a time until an “out of spec” condition is reached, and the like.
Preferably, the system 200 is configured so that the probes 100 are active and the electromagnetic flux is initiated only during the desired detection phase(s) and are not active during the intervening non-detection phases. This may help reduce the amount of energy required to operate the system 200. This may also reduce the overall amount of time that the induced electromagnetic flux is circulating through the rebar 115. For example, the probes 100 may be energized for a first detection phase that lasts 1 minute, deactivated for a non-detection phase that lasts 30 days and then re-energized for a second detection phase that lasts 1 minute, etc.
For example,
It will be appreciated that the method 2800 may be used to carry out non-destructive monitoring of the first attribute in systems having just a single probe coupled to the non-magnetic structure, or in systems having multiple probes coupled to the non-magnetic structure.
The method comprises at step 2801, introducing, at the first detection region, a pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal along the electromagnetic circuit and through the ferrous rebar using the first transmitter, the first pulsed electromagnetic interrogation signal being based on a pulsed voltage electrical signal provided by an input signal generator (such as pulsed eddy current generator 119). For example, the input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals automatically and regularly, such as according to a pre-arranged schedule, a frequency, or a period. As another example, the input signal generator may be configured to generate the pulsed voltage electrical signals on demand, such as according to a user input, such as for example in the event of random auditing by a user, such as a repair technician or engineer.
At step 2803, the method comprises receiving, at the first detection region, a response electromagnetic signal that is induced in the ferrous rebar and generating a corresponding response electrical signal comprising time information and voltage information using the first receiver. At step 2805, the method comprises determining the first attribute of the ferrous rebar at the first detection region based on the time information and the voltage information.
At step 2807, the method comprises generating a corresponding first output signal based on the first attribute. The generating may be carried out by, for example, the processing unit 121.
At step 2809, the method comprises comparing one of the first output signal and the first attribute, to a stored value for the first detection region to determine if a condition is met. The comparing may, for example, be carried out by processing structure such as the processing unit 121, or alternatively by the optional remote computing device 181 (if used) or a network of remote computing devices (if used). The stored value for the detection region may be, for example, a predefined threshold value (e.g., an initial value of the first output signal, a maximum limit, a minimum limit, and the like) of the first attribute for that detection region 172. The stored value may alternatively be, for example, a previously obtained first output signal (e.g., the most recent previously generated first output signal) for that detection region 172 or a previously obtained first attribute (e.g., the most recent previously generated first attribute) for that detection region 172. The condition may be any of, for example, difference above a threshold difference, difference below a threshold difference, percentage change above a threshold percentage change, percentage change below a threshold percentage change, rate of change above a threshold rate of change, rate of change below a threshold rate of change, and the like.
Following the comparing, the processing structure may for example generate a status signal based on the comparing. The status signal may be, for example, an alarm signal, an “OK” signal, a color-coded status indicator signal, a numeric signal, a quantitative signal, and the like. The status signal may include location information that enables the respective detection region to be identified, or in other words which allows the location of the probe (such as probe 100) in question to be clearly identified, so as to enable one or more users to understand and monitor the status of the rebar at that particular location over a period of time.
In embodiments where the probes 100 are fixed it may also be desirable in some circumstances to adapt the structure 202 to accommodate portions of the probes 100 or otherwise help facilitate the desired readings. This may include modifying portions of the structure 202 to match the shapes or features of the probes 100, and this may be done when the structure 202 is first constructed or may be achieved via retrofit. For example, referring to
Optionally, as shown, the core extender members 188 can be integrally formed with the yoke 109 (and formed of the same ferrite material). Alternatively, the core extender members 188 may be formed from separate members that are connected to the ends of the yoke 109.
In some other embodiments, such as when the probes 100 are contemplated prior to construction of the structure, at least some portions of the probes 100, including the coils 101, 103, 105, and 107 and yoke 109 can be embedded within the non-ferrous material along with the rebar 115. This may help position the probes 100 in a desired orientation and spacing relative to the rebar 115, and to hold them in place over time. This arrangement may also help protect the probes 100 from exposure to the ambient environment. Referring to
In this arrangement, the bar width 142 measurement is analogous to the measurements taken with the other embodiments of the probes 100, but the cover depth 144 measurement will be taken with reference to a measurement plane 190 that contains the coils 101, 103, 105, and 107, rather than being measured from the free surface 111.
While the teachings herein include illustrative embodiments and examples of some aspects of an invention, the description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Thus, various modifications of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, may be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to this description. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will cover any such modifications or embodiments.
All publications, patents, and patent applications referred to herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This application claims the benefit U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/323,681 filed Mar. 25, 2022, and entitled Deep Electromagnetic Rebar Probe, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CA2023/050400 | 3/24/2023 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63323681 | Mar 2022 | US |
