Unless otherwise indicated herein, the materials described in this section are not prior art to the claims in this application and are not admitted to being prior art by inclusion in this section.
Deflakers are used in the recycling process of papers and in separation of broke, dried pulp sheets, and pulp bales. The recycling process typically starts with a pulper that reduces the raw material into smaller particles (e.g., flakes) and some amount of individual fibers. Pulpers are used as a first step to ensure particle size will not cause plugging of subsequent equipment such as the deflakers, but they are inefficient in terms of energy consumption. The deflaker usually follows the pulping process. The deflaker takes the raw material from the pulper and reduces the flake content from a range between 30% and 90% down to levels below 5% and ideally below 1%. Depending on the grade of paper there may be a need to use multiple deflakers in series to achieve the required flake reduction efficiency. Furnish (e.g., stock) containing flakes is inadequate for paper making as it would generate a poor formation and a mottled paper.
Deflaker plates use rows of intermeshing teeth which can be arranged as concentric rings for a disk deflaker, or a combination of rotor and stator stepped cones for a conical deflaker that also provide a similar dynamic effect on flakes. The intermeshing edges and surfaces of the teeth are linear, straight, and relatively smooth. The operating gap between the intermeshing surfaces is usually in the order of around 1 mm. This configuration results in some of the mechanical energy being transferred to flakes and their separation, but also some energy is also applied to individual fibers, which will absorb this extra energy causing fiber transformation—something that is normally not desirable during the deflaking operation.
A rotor plate 125 may be coupled to the rotor 120. In some implementations, the rotor plate 125 may be a single piece circular disk. In some implementations, the rotor plate 125 may be formed from a series of individually machined concentric rings 126a-126c. While three concentric rings are illustrated in
A stepped rotor cone 225 may be coupled to the conical rotor 220. In some implementations, the rotor cone 225 may be a single piece cone. The single piece rotor cone 225 may be, for example, but not limited to, a single piece casting, a computer numerical control (CNC) machined cone, a welded assembly, etc. In some implementations, the rotor cone 225 may include a set of rotor plate segments assembled on the conical rotor 220 to form a cone. The stator cone 215 and the rotor cone 225 may have intermeshing teeth 250 to provide the deflaking effect. A gap 255 may be formed between the intermeshing teeth 250 through which the pulp may flow to be deflaked.
Rotor and stator deflaker plates having novel deflaker tooth patterns applicable for both disk and conical deflaking machines are provided.
According to various aspects there is provided a deflaker plate for a deflaker machine. In some aspects, the deflaker plate may include a substrate and a plurality of teeth extending from the substrate, wherein a specified number of teeth of the plurality of teeth have a serrated face.
According to various aspects there is provided deflaker plates for a deflaker machine. In some aspects, the deflaker plates may include: a first deflaker plate and a second deflaker plate. The first deflaker plate may include a first substrate and a first plurality of teeth extending from the first substrate. A first specified number of teeth of the first plurality of teeth may have a serrated face. The second deflaker plate may include a second substrate and a second plurality of teeth extending from the second substrate. A second specified number of teeth of the second plurality of teeth may have a serrated face. The first plurality of teeth may be configured to intermesh with the second plurality of teeth.
Numerous benefits are achieved by way of the various embodiments over conventional techniques. For example, the various embodiments provide deflaker plates for a deflaking machine having deflaker tooth patterns that can reduce the amount of energy directed into fiber refining (e.g., refining energy), while maintaining or improving the deflaking efficiency. In some embodiments, a specified number of teeth of a plurality of teeth of the deflaker plate have a serrated face. These and other embodiments along with many of its advantages and features are described in more detail in conjunction with the text below and attached figures.
Aspects and features of the various embodiments will be more apparent by describing examples with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
While certain embodiments are described, these embodiments are presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of protection. The apparatuses, methods, and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form of the example methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the scope of protection.
Similar reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views unless otherwise stated. Although the drawings represent embodiments of various features and components according to the present disclosure, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated in order to better illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure.
Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, the following rules of interpretation apply to this specification: (a) all words used herein shall be construed to be of such gender or number (singular or plural) as to circumstances require; (b) the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the,” as used in the specification and the appended claims include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise; (c) the antecedent term “about” applied to a recited range or value denotes an approximation within the deviation in the range or values known or expected in the art from the measurements; (d) the words “herein,” “hereby,” “hereto,” “hereinbefore,” and “hereinafter,” and words of similar import, refer to this specification in its entirety and not to any particular paragraph, claim, or other subdivision, unless otherwise specified; (e) descriptive headings are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any part of the specification; and (f) “or” and “any” are not exclusive and “include” and “including” are not limiting. Further, the terms, “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including but not limited to”).
Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range of within any sub ranges there between, unless otherwise clearly indicated herein. Each separate value within a recited range is incorporated into the specification or claims as if each separate value were individually recited herein. Where a specific range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth or less of the unit of the lower limit between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range or sub range hereof, is included herein unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. All subranges are also included. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges are also included therein, subject to any specifically and expressly excluded limit in the stated range.
Deflakers may be disk or conical machines featuring rows of intermeshing teeth that operate at high speed in order to generate maximum shear forces to separate flakes of recycled paper pulp. Deflaker plates use rows of intermeshing teeth which can be formed as concentric rings for a disk deflaker, or a combination of rotor and stator stepped cones or truncated stepped cones for a conical deflaker that also provide a similar dynamic effect on flakes. The deflakers operate at consistencies generally between 2% and 6%, and typical gaps between the crossing rows of teeth on the stator and rotor plates or cones are in the order of approximately 1 mm (0.5-2.0 mm). To achieve the best possible flake separation efficiency while minimizing the amount of energy (e.g., refining energy) imparted to individual fibers, the gap between the deflaker plates of the rotor and stator may be adjusted. However, if the gap is increased, the amount of refining energy may be decreased, but the deflaking effect also decreases. The decrease in deflaking effect can result in the need for more deflaking stages which would consume more overall energy as there are substantial losses due to pumping in each deflaker.
According to aspects of the present disclosure, novel deflaker tooth patterns applicable for both disk and conical deflaking machines are provided. The deflaker tooth patterns according to the present disclosure can reduce the amount of energy directed into fiber refining (e.g., refining energy), while maintaining or improving the deflaking efficiency. In addition, hydraulic frictional losses may be reduced resulting in less energy consumed for a given flake reduction performance (e.g., deflaking efficiency).
Aspects of the present disclosure provide a serrated surface on the teeth of the deflaker plates or deflaker cones. The term “conical” as used herein refers to both cones and truncated cones. The peaks and valleys of the serrated teeth may be formed at sharp angles. The serrated tooth surfaces can create a different gap condition and mechanical deflaking action. The serrated surfaces can catch the pulp flakes with the peaks on the surface and edges of the teeth to shear the flakes apart. Individual pulp fibers have a low probability of being caught by the sharp peaks and a lower probability of being treated in a scissor-type action of a crossing with an opposing sharp peak.
The peaks and valleys may form serration patterns having have different configurations, for example, but not limited to, linear, curved, circular, angled, cross-hatched, etc., serration patterns.
In some implementations, the serrations may be formed at an angle with respect to the substrate across the face of the deflaker teeth. In some implementations, the pattern of peaks and valleys may be formed similar to a screw thread around the tooth, providing a substantially homogeneous distribution of peaks and valleys at all positions along a tooth surface. In some implementations, only a portion of the tooth face may include serrations.
Referring again to
In some implementations, both the rotor plate and the stator plate may have serrated teeth. In some implementations, only the rotor plate or the stator plate may have serrated teeth. In some implementations, each tooth on the rotor plate and/or the stator plate may have serrations. In some implementations, only a portion of the teeth on the rotor plate and/or the stator plate may have serrations. In some implementations, only a portion of the tooth face on the rotor plate and/or the stator plate may include serrations.
According to some aspects of the present disclosure, serrated teeth may be provided for stator and rotor deflaker cones of a conical deflaker. The stator and rotor deflaker cones may be formed from conical plate segments or may be single piece cones. The stator and rotor deflaker cones may be stepped cones. In some implementations, the stepped cones may be angled stepped cones. Similar to the deflaker plates described with respect to
In some implementations, a surface hardening treatment of the deflaking surface of the teeth may be provided. The surface hardening treatment may be beneficial in keeping the peaks sharp throughout the life of the deflaker plates. The peaks and valleys may form serration patterns having have different configurations, for example, but not limited to, linear, curved, circular, angled, cross-hatched, etc., serration patterns. In some implementations, the serrations may be formed at an angle with respect to the substrate across the face of the deflaker teeth. In some implementations, the pattern of peaks and valleys may be formed similar to a screw thread around the tooth, providing a substantially homogeneous distribution of peaks and valleys at all positions along a tooth surface.
In some implementations, both the rotor cone and the stator cone may have serrated teeth. In some implementations, only the rotor cone or the stator cone may have serrated teeth. In some implementations, each tooth on the rotor cone and/or the stator cone may have serrations. In some implementations, only a portion of the teeth on the rotor cone and/or the stator cone may have serrations. In some implementations, only a portion of the tooth face on the rotor cone and/or the stator cone may include serrations.
The serrated tooth surfaces and edges properties of the stator and rotor plates and cones according to the present disclosure may improve the deflaking efficiency. Large flake sizes will easily be caught by the multiple peaks of the serrated surface; but the energy going into fiber refining, as well as hydraulic shear losses between passing teeth may be reduced. The operating gap between the intermeshing teeth may be reduced, resulting in improved flake removal efficiency in a single pass without increasing the energy losses due to fiber refining and hydraulic shear losses
The examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that these configuration as well as other variations of the disclosed configurations may be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/284,807, filed Dec. 1, 2021, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9643336 | Krivohlavek | May 2017 | B1 |
20070158484 | Gingras | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20100269991 | Antensteiner | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20210123482 | Kobayashi | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2243879 | Oct 2010 | EP |
3663461 | Jun 2020 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Application No. PCT/US2022/050288, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 27, 2023, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230167605 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63284807 | Dec 2021 | US |