Defoamer formulation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8426478
  • Patent Number
    8,426,478
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 24, 2008
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 23, 2013
    12 years ago
Abstract
Formulation comprising hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide, mineral oil and one or more emulsifiers, where the hydrophobicized silicon dioxide is a fumed silicon dioxide, possesses a BET surface area of 200 to 300 m2/g, has on the surface of the particles O—Si—(CnH2n+1)3 groups, where n is 1 to 3 and where the (CnH2n+1) units are alike or different, has a carbon content of 1.5% to 5% by weight, based on the hydrophobic silicon dioxide, and is present in the formulation with a fraction of 0.05% to 5% by weight.
Description

The invention relates to a defoamer formulation and to its use.


The use of hydrophobic silicon dioxide powders, more particularly those which are of pyrogenic origin (fumed), in defoamer formulations is known. Mention may be made, by way of example, of DE-A-282906, U.S. Pat. No. 4,377,493, DE-A 3411759, U.S. Pat. No. 4,344,858, WO95/05880 or DE-A-10138491. The effect of the hydrophobic silicon dioxide powders in such systems is generally to stabilize the defoamer formulation (acting as a sedimentation preventative) and to destroy more or less all of the foam. In this context it is observed that, depending on the medium in which the defoamer formulation is employed, the destruction of the foam is incomplete, the majority of the destruction involving macrobubbles. Microbubbles, in contrast, are destroyed to a far lesser extent, and this may significantly lessen the quality of a coating, for example.


The object of the present invention was therefore to find a defoamer formulation with which the number of microbubbles can be reduced.


It has now surprisingly been found that this object is achieved through a formulation comprising hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide, mineral oil and one or more emulsifiers, wherein the hydrophobicized silicon dioxide

    • is a fumed silicon dioxide,
    • possesses a BET surface area of 200 to 300 m2/g,
    • has on the surface of the particles O—Si—(CnH2n+1)3 groups, where n is 1 to 3 and where the (CnH2n+1) units are alike or different,
    • has a carbon content of 1.5% to 5% by weight, based on the hydrophobic silicon dioxide, and
    • is present in the formulation with a fraction of 0.05% to 5% by weight.


Fumed silicon dioxide particles are those obtained by flame oxidation and/or flame hydrolysis. Starting materials used for pyrogenic (fuming) processes may be organic and inorganic substances. Particularly suitable, for example, is silicon tetrachloride. Suitable organic starting compounds may for example be Si(OR)4 with R=CH3 or CH2CH3. The silicon dioxide particles obtained in this way are very largely pore-free and have free hydroxyl groups on the surface. The silicon dioxide particles are entirely or very largely in aggregated form.


The particles thus obtained are next subjected to a hydrophobicizing step. In this step O—Si—(CnH2n+1)3 groups are formed on the surface of the fumed silicon dioxide particles, where n is 1 to 3 and where the (CnH2n+1) units are alike or different. In the case of the hydrophobicized silicon dioxide powder present in the formulation of the invention, n may preferably be 1.


The BET surface area of the hydrophobicized silicon dioxide powder is 200 to 300 m2/g. The hydrophobicized silicon dioxide present in the formulation of the invention may preferably have a BET surface area of 230 to 290 m2/g and more preferably 250 to 270 m2/g.


The carbon content of the hydrophobicized silicon dioxide is generally 1% to 5% by weight, preferably 2% to 3% by weight, based in each case on the hydrophobic silicon dioxide.


Particular preference is given to a hydrophobicized silicon dioxide which carries O—Si—(CH3)3 groups on the surface, has a BET surface area of 230 to 290 m2/g and has a carbon content of 2% to 3% by weight, based on the hydrophobic silicon dioxide. A commercially available hydrophobicized silicon dioxide which exhibits these features is, for example, Aerosil® R812, Evonik Degussa GmbH.


The fraction of hydrophobicized silicon dioxide in the formulation of the invention is 0.05% to 5.0% by weight. Preferably the fraction may be 0.1% to 0.5% by weight.


A further component of the formulation of the invention is a mineral oil of the type typically used in defoamer formulations. The fraction of the mineral oil is preferably 40% to 90% by weight, based on the formulation.


Further components of the formulation of the invention are emulsifiers of the kind typically used in defoamer formulations. The fraction of the emulsifiers is preferably 2% to 25% by weight, based on the formulation.


The formulation of the invention may further comprise silicone oils, polyethersiloxanes and/or water.


The invention further provides for the use of the formulation of the invention for defoaming aqueous, polymeric systems based on acrylic esters.







EXAMPLE








TABLE 1







Fumed hydrophobicized silicon dioxides












Hydrophilic
Hydropho-
BET
C Content



SiO2 basis
bicizing
surface
[% by


AEROSIL ®*)
[m2/g]
agent
area [m2/g]
weight]





R 106
300
D4**)
250 ± 30
1.5-3.5


R 816
200
hexadecyl-
190 ± 20
0.9-1.8




silane


R 972
130
dimethyl-
110 ± 20
0.6-1.2




dichloro-




silane


R 812
300
hexamethyl-
260 ± 30
2.0-3.0




disilazane


R 974
200
dimethyl-
170 ± 20
0.7-1.3




dichloro-




silane


R 8200
200
hexamethyl-
160 ± 25
2.0-4.0




disilazane





*)Evonik Degussa;


**)octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane













TABLE 2







Dispersion of hydrophobicized silicon dioxide in mineral oil









% by weight














Risella 917*
97.0



Hydrophobicized SiO2
3.0



Total
100.0







*Mineral oil













TABLE 3







Emulsifier mixture









% by weight














Polyethylene glycol 600 monooleate*
6.4



Polyethylene glycol 600 dioleate*
24.4



Polypropylene oxide 1000
69.2



Total
100.0







*Nopco Paper Technology, Drammen, Norway













TABLE 4







Formulation









% by weight














Dispersion
56.8



Al stearate 1)
1.5



Emulsifier mixture
18.2



Dispersion
11.0



Dispersion
11.0



Silicone oil 2)
0.5



Polyethersiloxane 3)
1.0



Total
100








1) LIGA TR;





2) DC 200/100 cSt;





3) LA-E-1143, Tego







First of all, using an Ultra-Turrax (10 min, 10 000 revolutions), a dispersion of mineral oil and hydrophobicized silicon dioxide was prepared.


Separately from this an emulsifier mixture was prepared by mixing of the constituents in Table 3.


The formulation as per Table 4 was obtained by mixing of the stated components.


The aqueous acrylic ester system used was Primal® EP 2596 from Rohm and Haas.


Determination of defoaming behaviour:


a) Macrofoam: 80 weight fractions of Primal® EP 2596 are diluted with 20 weight fractions of water and then homogenized with a dissolver at a low shear rate over a period of 10 minutes. A 100 ml glass beaker is charged with 30 g of this mixture and 0.5% by weight of fumed, hydrophobicized silicon dioxide and the resulting mixture is homogenized using a Dispermat LC-2 dissolver with a 2.5 mm toothed disc at 1000 rpm for one minute. The dissolver should be placed 1 cm above the base of the vessel.


Thereafter the mixture is treated at 3000 rpm for a period of one minute and immediately thereafter a 25 g sample is placed in a 50 ml volumetric cylinder and the volume is ascertained.


b) Microfoam: in addition, a count was conducted of the air bubbles enclosed in a dry coat, using a microscope.



FIG. 1 shows the volume of the macrofoam (bars) and the number of enclosed air bubbles (microfoam) as a function of hydrophobicized silicon dioxides, the reference numerals having the following definitions: 1=no defoamer, 2=no hydrophobicized silicon dioxide, 3=Aerosil® R106; 4=Aerosil® R812, 5=Aerosil® R816, 6=Aerosil® R972, 7=Aerosil® R974, 8=Aerosil® R8200. The example with Aerosil® R812 is inventive; the others serve as comparative examples.


The inventive Example 4 shows the best defoamer action in relation to macrofoam and microfoam.

Claims
  • 1. A formulation consisting of hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide, mineral oil and one or more emulsifiers, wherein the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide are fumed,possesses a BET surface area of 200 to 300 m2/g,have on the surface of the particles O—Si—(CnH2n+1)3 groups, where n is 1 to 3 and where the (CnH2n+1) units are alike or different,have a carbon content of 1.5% to 5% by weight, based on the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide, andare present in the formulation in an amount of from 0.05% to 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the formulation,wherein the formulation comprises: 40% to 90% by weight, based on the total weight of the formulation, of the mineral oil, and2% to 25% by weight, based on the total weight of the formulation, of the emulsifier.
  • 2. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein n is 1.
  • 3. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the BET surface area is 230 to 290 m2/g.
  • 4. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the carbon content is 2% to 5%, based on the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide.
  • 5. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the fraction of hydrophobicized silicon dioxide is 0.1% to 1% by weight, based on the formulation.
  • 6. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the BET surface area is 250 to 270 m2/g.
  • 7. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the carbon content is 2% to 3% by weight, based on the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide.
  • 8. The formulation according to claim 1, which contains 0.1% to 0.5% by weight of the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide, based on the total weight of the formulation.
  • 9. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the (CnH2n+1) units are alike.
  • 10. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the (CnH2n+1) units are different.
  • 11. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the carbon content is 2% to 3% by weight, based on the hydrophobicized particles of silicon dioxide.
  • 12. A composition comprising the formulation according to claim 1 and at least one acrylic ester.
  • 13. A method of defoaming aqueous systems comprising adding the formulation according to claim 1 to an aqueous polymeric system comprising an acrylic ester.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2007 061 455 Dec 2007 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2008/066059 11/24/2008 WO 00 6/16/2010
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2009/080428 7/2/2009 WO A
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3951853 Suwala Apr 1976 A
4028218 Fink et al. Jun 1977 A
4384976 Gruenert et al. May 1983 A
4514319 Kulkarni et al. Apr 1985 A
4655960 Wuhrmann et al. Apr 1987 A
5599481 Walger Feb 1997 A
5658852 Murphy et al. Aug 1997 A
5976701 Barancyk et al. Nov 1999 A
6353068 Dietz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6656975 Christiano et al. Dec 2003 B1
20040146475 Peffly et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050113261 Huber et al. May 2005 A1
20070112078 Procter et al. May 2007 A1
20070145327 Lortz et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080021152 Rautschek et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090137446 Rautschek et al. May 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
27 45 583 Apr 1979 DE
2005-525931 Sep 2005 JP
2005-279565 Oct 2005 JP
03 029338 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03099413 Dec 2003 WO
2004 089825 Oct 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Japanese Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-538532, dated Dec. 7, 2012. (w/English Translation).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110003921 A1 Jan 2011 US