This invention relates to a deformable composite seal for bearing surfaces with a great lack of flatness.
In aiming to transmit a sufficient contact pressure between the bearing surfaces and the seal, said pressure must be as uniform as possible. A minimum pressure is required to ensure the leak tightness of the seal. However, the leak tightness can also be compromised by the lack of flatness of the bearing surfaces if the seal is too rigid to adapt thereto, the uniformity of the pressure being lost. In addition, the contact of a rigid seal with the bearing surfaces devoid of flatness may produce excessive local pressures, particularly if the bearing surfaces are made of fragile materials. This is for example the case of enamelled flanges, for which the German standard DIN 28 007-2, for example, allows up to 8 millimetres of lack of flatness for flanges of diameter between 1000 and 2000 millimetres.
Everyday seals are thus either too rigid in producing excessive pressures or, quite the reverse, lacks of leak tightness on non flat surfaces, or too flexible, incapable of applying an adequate contact pressure.
Seals made of elastomer may give satisfaction in certain cases, but are destroyed at high temperature or in the presence of certain fluids that are to be sealed. Their use is thus not universal. Some, especially hollow or inflatable, are in any case too flexible to transmit sufficient strain on the bearing surfaces.
Another known type of leak tight seal consists in a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) envelope containing a corrugated spring ensuring the contact of the envelope on the bearing surface or the bearing surfaces. An example is given in DE-U-89 14536. PTFE resists most fluids and thus resolves a deficiency of seals made of elastomer vis-à-vis the chemical compatibility with the fluids of the process. A drawback is that the corrugated spring is incapable of applying a uniform pressure on the deformed bearing surfaces.
Those skilled in the art know how to improve such seals by inserting between the spring and the envelope shims made of aramid fibres, for example, of more or less greater thickness depending on the amplitude of the local lacks of flatness. A relatively uniform contact pressure is then obtained, but the method is not reliable and it is long to implement. It is in any case doubtful that satisfactory results are obtained with significant lacks of flatness. Such conceptions are disclosed in DE-A-36 01346 or DE-A-195 39761. The document U.S. Pat. No. 5,558,347 must also be cited, in which the elastic part of the seal is composed of two corrugated springs welded together filled with gas under pressure. This more complicated design contributes to reducing the heterogeneity of the contact pressure, without eliminating it completely. The text moreover indicates that this type of leak tightness is firstly intended for enamelled flanges of diameter less than 213 millimetres.
The document U.S. Pat. No. 4,9961,891 discloses a flat seal made of cellular PTFE material, thus having a high compressibility. The structure being nevertheless porous, it cannot be allowed with certain hazardous fluids, and the seal is difficult to clean.
The document EP-0100 228 discloses a seal composed of a high viscosity mass, which can if necessary be in the form of powder or granules before a physical transformation, when the material is thermoplastic, in order to adjust better to the extreme faces of the seal; but no transmission of strains is envisaged for this seal which is not designed to serve under pressure.
The document FR-A-2 190 317, which seems to be the conception the closest to the invention, concerns a sound insulation seal for highly irregular surfaces such as the perimeter of a human ear. The contact of the seal with these surfaces is made through the intermediary of an air-impermeable sack in the form of bead closed on itself and filled with balls circulating therein by sliding against each other. The sack can lose its shape and hug the shape of the surface in contact. Such a seal is however not suited either to be applied with a uniform pressure since its capacities of transmission of strain between the bearing surfaces remain too limited.
The present invention represents an improved seal that satisfies both the necessities of being deformable enough to adapt to significant lacks of flatness but rigid to apply a sufficient contact pressure. To resume, it relates to a seal comprising a deformable envelope and a core contained in the envelope, the core being constituted of a granular fluid in a flexible sack, characterised in that the sack is air-permeable and filled in part with the granular fluid. This “granular fluid” is diphasic, it is constituted of ambient air capable of passing through the wall of the sack, or more generally gas, and capable of sliding against each other. Finally, the sack is movable in the envelope.
The partial filling of the sack by the granular fluid signifies that a volume of air remains inside the sack in addition to the interstices between the stacked grains. Since however the sack is porous, a part of this volume of air can disappear if the compression of the seal is big enough to reduce sufficiently its internal volume. The grains constituting the fluid enjoy a high mobility in the sack as long as a volume of air remains therein: they thus slide easily up to adapting to significant lacks of flatness. When the volume of air has disappeared, the transmission of pressure takes place through the contact of the balls, which withstand high contact pressures thanks to their rigidity and to the stability of their assembly, but a sliding faculty remains, which makes it possible to adjust, up to the end, excessive pressure differences from one point to another of the seal. The mobility of the sack in the envelope favours the good distribution of the balls and their flow between the bearing surfaces of the seal.
A certain elasticity of the sack may be tolerated or even preferred to enable it to extend in response to the strains and to further favour the sliding of the grains. A higher elasticity is however inadvisable since the seal would become too flexible. Which is why an essentially inextensible sack may also be proposed. If it is elastic and thus extensible, it may be reinforced with threads or other portions made of essentially inextensible material extending in a single direction of the sack, to enable the extension only in the other direction.
Rigid components, such as discs, may also be arranged near to the sack, to serve as local reinforcements to the sack, or to limit its movements and deformations to make it locally completely rigid.
The operation of the seal is improved if the envelope is made of PTFE, on which the sack slides easily. In a more particularly favourable embodiment, the envelope is made of restructured PTFE formed of a strip rolled upon itself to enclose the sack.
The invention will now be described with reference to
and
Two bearing surfaces 1 and 2 are opposite and parallel according to
The sack 9 is deformable, air-permeable, and little or not extensible. To retain the grains 10, it is completely closed and the pores are smaller than the grains 10. It may be made of a woven or knitted material. When a compression is applied to the seal 3 by the coming together of the surfaces 1 and 2, the state of
An example of application of this seal concerns an enamelled chemical reactor constituted of a vessel surmounted by a cover. The seal 3 is arranged between them to establish the leak tightness. The temperature conditions are between the limits of −60° C. and +250° C. The internal pressure in the reactor may be between 0 bars absolute (vacuum) and 7 bars absolute. The envelope is constituted of a restructured PTFE material produced by the Garlock Company and of Gylon style 3 504 make, and the sack 9 is made of polyacrylonitrile fabric. The grains are small steel balls. Lubricant may be added to the diphasic gas-solid fluid.
Certain improvement possibilities will now be described. It has been seen that an exaggerated elasticity of the sack 9 was inadvisable. The natural elasticity may be reduced by reinforcing it with inextensible threads or fibres 13. It is possible to add them in one direction only, for example the direction of circumference of the sections, which is represented in
Excessive deformations of the core 8, or excessive flattenings of the sections of the sack 9, may be avoided by appropriate obstacles, such as a cylindrical disc 14 surrounding the seal 3. Another cylindrical disc, not represented, could be arranged on the other side of the sack 9. Other discs 15 and 16, or even plates, may be inserted between the sack 9 and the lips 5 and 6. They must spread out locally the specific pressure to aid the seal 3 to adapt to the significant deformations of the bearing surfaces 1 and 2. By its elasticity properties, each of the discs 15 and 16 may help to compensate a possible creep of the corresponding lip 5 or 6; other elastic components could be inserted between the envelope 4 and the core 8 with the same effect. However, since restructured PTFE has a non-cellular structure, it also has improved creep resistance. The discs 15 and 16 may also be made of harder material to spread out more regularly the pushing force of the grains.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 56879 | Oct 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/063199 | 10/9/2009 | WO | 00 | 3/31/2011 |