The present invention relates to a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality assurance (QA) phantom apparatus and, in particular, to a deformable imaging phantom for 4-Dimensional (4D) motion tracking.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-established diagnostic imaging modality which is the gold standard for many applications due to its superior soft tissue contrast. The wide variety of contrast mechanisms can reveal both subtle and dramatic anatomical, functional, and pathological details with higher sensitivity and specificity than other imaging modalities.
More recently, the advantages of MRI are being used in image guided applications, such as neurosurgical planning and radiation planning and therapy. For example, in image guided radiation therapy, the ability to visualize tumors and real-time radiation dose distributions is expected to result in higher targeted dose to tumor regions with a concomitant decrease in radiation exposure to healthy tissue, resulting in more effective treatments and higher survival rates in afflicted patients. In some cases, image guided radiation therapy is the only viable treatment option for certain types of cancer. An important challenge related to radiation therapy is compensating for physiological motion that can confound precise targeting of moving tumors. Motion can be induced due to breathing, cardiac motion, peristaltic movement of the gastrointestinal tract, and the displacement of organs associated with the passage of digestive gases. Current techniques based on computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging have poor soft tissue visualization and fail to accurately compensate for motion and tumor position. Therefore, they are subject to both significant errors and increased risk of injury to healthy tissue, due to positioning margins that are larger than the tumor size. Techniques based on breath hold and gating are typically employed to estimate tumor position, resulting in longer treatment times and additional risk associated with tumor position uncertainty.
Physiological tumor movement stems in hierarchy from the host organ. A force is applied to the host organ via common modalities such as breathing, cardiac beats, digestion, gas movement etc. This force creates both motion and deformation of the organ. Motion is defined as the displacement of the isocenter of the object; whereas, deformation is the change in shape through the application of pressure. Organ motion is capable of causing a simple 1:1 motion of the tumor volume which is currently modelled by known rigid inserts. What is not well understood is the effect of organ deformation. Organ deformation causes both tumor motion and deformation.
The recent introduction of MR-guided Linac systems into the clinical radiation therapy setting has presented a paradigm shift in the treatment of cancer, with the provision of exquisite soft tissue contrast only available through MR imaging. The ability to clearly visualize tumors and organs at risk in real time, and while moving, can provide clinicians with the ability to reduce treatment margins, increase dose to the tumor, and decrease dose to healthy tissue. It is envisioned that current techniques will be expanded to include real time physiological motion tracking with MR imaging, providing the ability to change or adapt the radiation beam to move with and precisely target moving tumors. This will eliminate the need to gate the radiation beam or employ breath hold techniques to localize the tumor. The result will be more effective treatment of cancers associated with high mortality due to their proximity to other sensitive or moving organs, such as pancreatic, liver and lung cancer.
Current state-of-the-art techniques for motion management involve the use of rigid structure motion phantoms to develop gating and rigid body tracking techniques. The development and implementation of next generation 4D motion tracking techniques using MR guidance for radiation therapy will rely on the use of effective and realistic QA tools to simulate 4D deformable motion associated with real tumor motion.
Accordingly, there is a need for QA phantoms with the ability to simulate a deformable anatomical structure for use with the next-generation 4D motion imaging systems.
A deformable phantom, according to the present invention, has a housing made of a MRI invisible material enclosing and defining a first boundary of a sealed reservoir filled with a MRI signal producing material. A sleeve is reciprocatingly mounted to the housing, extending into the housing and defining a second boundary of the sealed reservoir. A piston is reciprocatingly mounted within the sleeve, extending into the housing and defining a third boundary of the sealed reservoir. A deformable structure is located within the boundaries of the sealed reservoir and one or more point dosimeters are located on or within the deformable structure.
In another embodiment, the deformable structure has a deformable target therein, having a different proton or electron density from the surrounding deformable structure. The one or more point dosimeters are one or more scintillators located on or within the deformable target.
In another embodiment, each of the one or more scintillators is connected to an optical fibre which extends out of the housing.
In another embodiment, the optical fibre of each of the one or more scintillators is joined together into a single optical fibre and each of the one or more scintillators is configured to emit light on a different wavelength.
In another embodiment, the piston is connected to a motion assembly to drive the motion of the piston relative to the housing. The motion assembly may be configured to provide one or both linear and rotational motion to the piston and the deformable phantom may be configured for use as an insert in a second phantom, such as a human thorax phantom.
In another embodiment, a deformable phantom, according to the present invention, has a housing made of a MRI invisible material enclosing and defining a first boundary of a sealed reservoir filled with a MRI signal producing material. The sealed reservoir has a first volume portion and a second variable volume portion in fluid communication therewith. A piston is reciprocatingly mounted to the housing, extending into the housing and defining a second boundary of the sealed reservoir. A deformable structure is located within the boundaries of the sealed reservoir. One or more point dosimeters are located on or within the deformable structure. The second variable volume portion varies to accommodate displacement of the fluid MRI signal producing material caused by the movement of the piston.
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, a preferred embodiment thereof will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The deformable imaging phantom, according to the present invention, simulates physiological motion and deformation profiles of an anatomical structure for use in 4D motion tracking with next-generation MR imaging systems. The deformable imaging phantom may be used on its own or as an insert in another phantom, such as a human thorax section phantom to simulate the movement and/or deformation of physiological structures in a living patient. Although the present invention is described with reference to a deformable imaging phantom, certain embodiments may be used as a deformable phantom for other applications, such as dosimetry.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Where a foam material is used for the deformable structure 4, MR image contrast with the target 5 is provided by the difference in proton (hydrogen) density, which MR imaging is particularly well suited to differentiate. Where a continuous medium is used, it will show its own intrinsic MR signal. The deformable structure 4 and target 5 also exhibit a difference in electron density, to which x-ray Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is well suited. Therefore, multimodality 4D imaging is possible in certain embodiments. The hardness of the material of the target 5 should be such that it permits deformability and flexibility in operation. Preferably, the silicone rubber material of the target 5 has a Shore 00 scale hardness, more preferably, the target 5 has a hardness between Shore 00-10 and Shore 00-30.
Optionally, instead of one or more targets 5, the deformable structure 4 may include voids or regions having a different composition or density of material. The internal organ/tumor model may include varying density foam, rigid objects or tethers, with or without a coating or barrier (for alternative interior contrast). The material is not limited to foam and could be a urethane rubber, thermoplastic elastomer (such as styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene co-polymer), latex balloon, or hydrogel, with or without the addition of high-density, non-metallic, non-conductive powder for increased CT contrast. The different proton or electron densities of these regions results in different imaging properties. In
Optionally, the target 5, the deformable structure 4 or both may be used as deformable dosimeters for measurement of the dose and distribution of the ionizing radiation delivered to the target 5 and/or the deformable structure 4, as registered by MM, x-ray CT, optical methods or any other compatible imaging modality, either in situ or following disassembly of the device. Such deformable dosimeters can be formed by addition of radiation indicators, such as acrylamide and bis-acrylamide monomers, to a deformable hydrogel, where the radiation-induced polymerization can be determined by MRI, CT or optical methods. Other suitable indicators include radiochromic dyes, which may be added to a deformable hydrogel or to urethane or silicone rubber materials, where the radiation-induced color change can be determined by optical methods. Alternatively, the radiation-induced cross-linking of silicone or urethane rubbers, doped with appropriate additives, may be detected by MRI or CT imaging and used to measure the accumulated radiation dose. In the further alternative, an ion chamber or other radiation measurement device may be placed in a recess in the target 5, which may act as or receive an ion chamber holder.
In one preferred embodiment, as shown in
Preferably, the point dosimeters are plastic scintillator radiation detectors, or scintillators 20, which emit light when exposed to high-energy radiation. Any type of (MR-safe) scintillator may be used in the phantom 1, for example, inorganic scintillation crystals, small-molecule organic glass scintillators, or plastic scintillators. Alternatively, other types of point dosimeters may be used, in place of scintillators, such as micro-ionizing chambers, microdiodes, or single crystal diamond detectors. Preferably, the scintillators 20 are a 1 mm diameter sphere made of a MR-safe plastic scintillator material, encapsulated within a 5 mm diameter spherical plastic envelope, and connected to an optical fibre 21 that extends out of the housing 2 of the phantom 1 to transmit the signal (i.e. light) produced by the scintillator 20 in or on the target 5 to monitoring equipment, which measures the light produced by the scintillator 20.
As shown in
Each of the scintillators 20 is connected to an optical fibre 21 for transmitting the light generated by the scintillator 20. The fibres 21 from the plurality of scintillators 20 may remain separate and their signals isolated from one another for measurement purposes. Alternatively, each of the plurality of scintillators 20 may be configured to emit light on a different wavelength and their respective fibres 21 may join together into a single fibre 21 that carries the signals from the plurality of scintillators 20 out of the phantom 1 to measurement equipment configured to distinguish between their respective signals, based on the different wavelengths of light each scintillator 20 produces.
The point dosimeters or other radiation measurement devices in the phantom 1 are selected or configured to detect or measure high-energy ionizing radiation, such as x-rays, gamma rays, electron beams, and heavy particles (i.e. protons, neutrons, and ions). As used herein, the term “radiation” is not intended to be limited to electromagnetic radiation and includes other forms of high-energy or ionizing radiation, such as particle radiation.
As shown in
The piston 6 and reciprocating sleeve 7 are configured to conserve a constant fluid volume within the sealed reservoir 3 as the piston 6 and reciprocating sleeve 7 move between a retracted position, shown in
Alternatively, rather than using a piston 6 and reciprocating sleeve 7 to conserve a constant fluid volume, the sealed reservoir 3 may be configured with a first volume portion and a second variable volume portion to accommodate the displacement of the fluid within the first volume portion of the sealed reservoir 3, caused by the movement of the piston 6 in and out of the sealed reservoir 3. Preferably, the sealed reservoir 3, according to this embodiment, is configured as described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,180,484 B2 or 10,310,048 B2 in the name of the present applicant. The first volume portion is the space defined by the sidewall 2a and the end caps 2b of the housing 2. The second volume portion is an expandable chamber or an expandable bladder attached to the housing 2 and in fluid communication with the first volume portion. Alternatively, the second variable volume portion may be provided by way of a compressible deformable structure 4 within the sealed reservoir 3, which compresses in response to the movement of the piston 6 into the sealed reservoir 3.
The head 6a of the piston 6 permits the MRI contrast media filling the sealed reservoir 3 to flow past or through the head 6a, such that the MRI contrast media on one side of the head 6a is in fluid communication with the MRI contrast media on the other side of the head 6a. As shown in
Preferably, the deformable structure 4 is attached to the piston head 6a by any suitable means of attachment, such as an adhesive, allowing for both motion and deformation of the target 5. A preferred adhesive is an acrylate, which may be applied sparingly to form a strong chemical bond between the deformable structure 4 and the piston head 6a, while minimizing closed cells and resulting air voids, which can introduce MR or CT imaging artifacts. Alternatively, as shown in
A motion assembly 9, such as a MR compatible motor system, may be connected to the piston 6 to drive the motion of the piston 6 relative to the housing 2. Preferably, the motion assembly 9 is a MR compatible piezoelectric motor assembly, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,090,781 B2 in the name of the present applicant. Alternatively, other types of motion assemblies may be used, such as pneumatic or hydraulic drives. The motion assembly 9 is connected to the piston 6 by way of a shaft 10 that is operatively engaged with the motion assembly 9. The shaft 10 is driven by the motion assembly 9 to provide linear and/or rotational motion to the piston 6. The phantom 1 thereby provides deformable 4D motion with hysteresis for use in 4D motion tracking. Optionally, the motion assembly 9 may be controlled by a programmable controller, capable of generating periodic or aperiodic motion profiles.
As shown in
Optionally, as shown in
Fiducial markers, or fiducials 14, may be positioned at any desired location within the phantom 1 for modeling verification, such as attached to the target 5 within the deformable structure 4, as shown in
The deformable structure 4 may be made with a consistent density across the entire deformable structure 4, or, alternatively may have a density gradient. For example, the density of the foam material may be the highest adjacent the end cap 2b and become progressively lower towards the piston 6.
In certain preferred embodiments, the amplitude (range) of motion that the phantom 1 is able to achieve is about 4 cm (+/−20 mm) which is physiologically relevant to the motion of a human diaphragm within the thorax of a patient. Within the thorax the most common organ to gait during treatment is the lungs, which exhibits 2-3 cm of deformation during breathing. From the organ deformation, the tumor itself will move approximately 1 to 1.2 cm each cycle. Finally, the deformation of the organ causes deformation of the tumor which can be quantified in the range of 0-5 mm.
In embodiments that include an end plate 2c, the end plate 2c provides the ability to decouple deformation and motion by allowing the deformable structure 4 and the target 5 to move a certain distance, before the sliding motion of the end plate 2c is stopped. Preferably, the end plate 2c is permitted to move about 2.5 cm before coming into contact with the end cap 2b. Once contact is established the target 5 will begin to exhibit a combination of motion and deformation over the remaining stroke of the amplitude of the system, which is preferably about 1.5 cm. Out of that 1.5 cm, about 0.5 cm of deformation in the linear length of the target 5 is achieved. By limiting the amplitude/stroke of the motor can produce a waveform of +/−2.5 cm that is purely motion, or the motor may be run to produce a waveform in the +/−1.5 cm range to produce a combination of motion and deformation. The customization of the waveform patterns dictates the amount of motion and deformation that is observed.
The present invention has been described and illustrated with reference to an exemplary embodiment, however, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as set out in the following claims. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6635486 | Madsen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7667191 | Serban et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8535061 | Boutchko et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20130218001 | Uhlemann | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20160133159 | Saloux et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170018205 | Santhanam et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20100047910 | May 2010 | KR |
1017141946 | May 2017 | KR |
2007064951 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008151202 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2014022480 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2015161337 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chang, Jina et al. “Development of a deformable lung phantom for the evaluation of deformable registration.” Journal of applied clinical medical physics vol. 11,1 3081. Jan. 28, 2010 (Year: 2010). |
Matrosic CK, Hull J, Palmer B, Culberson W, Bednarz B. Deformable abdominal phantom for the validation of real-time image guidance and deformable dose accumulation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. Aug. 2019;20(8):122-133 (Year: 2019). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230204702 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62863932 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16906494 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 18110974 | US |