Defrost control method and apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6718778
  • Patent Number
    6,718,778
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 15, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 13, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A defrost control system detects the variation in flow rate of refrigerant through an evaporator 8 while the flow is regulated to achieve a desired level of superheat at the outlet of the evaporator 8. When the flow rate becomes unstable, defrosting of the evaporator 8 is triggered.
Description




The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling defrosting of an evaporator in a heat transfer system, particularly but not exclusively in a refrigeration system in which there is a forced airflow over the evaporator.





FIG. 1

shows in cross-section a refrigerated display cabinet


2


, which is one example of such a refrigeration system. The cabinet


2


has a number of shelves for displaying chilled food or drinks. The cabinet


2


is open at the front (to the left in

FIG. 1

) to allow shoppers easy access to the contents of the shelves


4


. The contents are cooled by air blown by a fan


6


over an evaporator


8


of the refrigeration system, which cools the air. As shown by the arrows in

FIG. 1

, the air leaves the evaporator


8


, is forced up a duct


10


and escapes through small vents


12


so that some of the air flows over the contents of the shelves


4


.




Most of the air passes through an end aperture


14


at the top of the cabinet


2


and falls as a curtain of cold air down the open front of the cabinet


2


and into an inlet


16


, to be recirculated over the evaporator


8


. The air curtain hinders the warm ambient air from entering the cabinet.




However, some of the ambient air is drawn into the inlet


16


. The ambient air includes water vapour which condenses and freezes on the evaporator


8


to form frost. The frost impedes the passage of air over the evaporator


8


and reduces the efficiency of heat exchange between the evaporator


8


and the air. If the frost is allowed to build up, the rate of airflow will be reduced sufficiently to prevent the air curtain from forming and the internal temperature of the cabinet will rise. Furthermore, the efficiency of the refrigeration system will be reduced, leading to higher running costs.




For these reasons, it is necessary to defrost the evaporator


8


in such refrigeration systems every few hours. There are different conventional methods by which this can be done. In the “air over” or “off cycle” method, the refrigeration is stopped and the evaporator


8


is defrosted by air at ambient temperature passing over it. In the electric defrost method, electric heating elements are provided around the evaporator


8


. During a defrost cycle, the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator


8


is stopped and the electric heating elements are switched on, thereby melting the frost; the fan


6


may be switched off.




In the gas defrost method, gas is passed through the evaporator so as to warm it and melt the frost. The gas may be directed from the outlet of the compressor of the refrigeration system through the evaporator, so that the evaporator


8


acts temporarily as a condenser and the refrigeration cycle acts in reverse to release heat from the evaporator


8


. This is known as the “hot gas” method.




Alternatively, the gas may be taken from the top of the receiver of the refrigeration system, in which the refrigerant is stored before passing through the expansion valve. This is known as the “cool gas” method, since the refrigerant has passed through the condenser and is cool.




During a defrost, the air temperature inside the cabinet


2


rises above the normal storage temperature, and the contents are subject to “temperature shock”. The effect of this temperature shock is to reduce the shelf life of perishable goods. Moreover, the defrost cycle consumes a significant amount of energy, typically around 10% of the total energy used in refrigeration.




Therefore defrost cycles should not occur too frequently, but neither should they occur so infrequently that the refrigeration efficiency of the cabinet


2


is impaired.




In one conventional method of defrost control, a defrost is initiated periodically at intervals sufficiently short to prevent the evaporator


8


from frosting up completely and thereby blocking the flow of air, even at the maximum absolute humidity for which the cabinet


2


is designed. This interval is typically between 6 and 8 hours. However, when the absolute humidity is less than its maximum, defrosts occur more frequently than required.




It is therefore desirable to initiate a defrost “on demand”, that is to say only when it is needed.




The document U.S. Pat. No. 5,046,324 discloses a defrost control method in which defrosting is initiated periodically, but a defrost operation is omitted when the total proportion of time spent operating the refrigeration cycle during the last refrigeration period is less than a predetermined value.




The present applicant's earlier patent publications U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,813,242, GB-A-2314915 and EP-A-816783 disclose a defrost control method and apparatus in which a defrost is initiated in response to the detected superheat at the outlet of an evaporator. In a disclosed example, a controller controls the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator so as to keep the temperature of the thermal load constant. However, if the detected superheat at the outlet of the evaporator is too low, the controller enters an override state so that the flow of refrigerant is reduced, thereby raising the superheat. If the period spent in the override condition exceeds a predetermined level, a defrost is initiated.




The present applicant's patent publication no. GB 2348947 discloses a defrost control method and apparatus in which the flow rate through an evaporator is regulated to maintain a desired level of superheat at the outlet. An initial flow rate is measured immediately after a defrost. As the evaporator frosts up, the flow rate falls as the rate of heat transfer into the evaporator falls. When the flow rate has fallen to a predetermined fraction of the initial flow rate, defrosting of the evaporator is triggered.




According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for controlling defrosting of an evaporator in a heat transfer system, including controlling the flow rate of refrigerant through the evaporator so as to maintain the superheat of refrigerant at or about an outlet of the evaporator substantially constant, and initiating defrosting of the evaporator in response to the fluctuation of the flow rate through the evaporator satisfying a predetermined criterion which indicates that the flow has become unstable.




The flow rate may be controlled automatically by a thermostatic expansion valve. Alternatively, the level of superheat is detected by a sensor and an electronically controlled expansion valve is controlled to keep the superheat at a predetermined level.




The flow rate may be sensed by a flow rate sensor. Alternatively, the flow rate is derived from the degree or period of opening of the expansion valve. Alternatively, the fluctuation in the superheat at the outlet of the evaporator may be measured. An approximate measure of the superheat may be used, derived from the difference between the temperature at the outlet and at a point upstream of the outlet within the evaporator.




Preferably, the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator is switched on and off in response to the sensed temperature of a thermal load rising above a predetermined maximum temperature and falling below a predetermined minimum temperature respectively. The fluctuation of the flow rates is detected only during the period in which the flow is switched on.




The present invention also encompasses apparatus and/or software arranged to carry out the above method.




The fluctuation of the flow rates has been found to give more reliable indication of the degree of frosting of an evaporator than the prior art methods. Moreover, the algorithm based on fluctuation of flow rates is relatively simple to set up and operate, and can be added to an otherwise conventional control apparatus. Measurement of the fluctuation in superheat is particularly advantageous as there is no need to install a flow meter; instead, sensors already required for flow regulation may be used, or only additional temperature sensors need be installed.











Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional diagram of a refrigerated display cabinet;





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of control apparatus for a refrigeration system in a first embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of control apparatus for a refrigeration system in a second embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a schematic diagram of control apparatus for a refrigeration system in a third embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a flow chart of a defrost control algorithm performed by the controller in each of the embodiments;





FIG. 6

is a graph of the mean refrigerant flow in a refrigeration system in an experimental example; and





FIG. 7

is a graph of the further parameters relating to the variation of flow in the experimental example.











EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION




Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to

FIGS. 1

to


7


.

FIGS. 2

to


4


show part of a refrigeration system with control apparatus according to first, second and third embodiments of the invention respectively.




In each embodiment, an expansion valve


18


admits refrigerant at high pressure into the evaporator


8


at low pressure. As the refrigerant passes at low pressure through the evaporator


8


, it evaporates and absorbs heat from the air surrounding the evaporator


8


as the latent heat of evaporation. The evaporated refrigerant passes through an outlet


24


of the evaporator


8


and is returned through a suction pipe to a compressor


26


which compresses the refrigerant to high pressure and outputs it to the condenser (not shown), where the refrigerant condenses and releases the latent heat.




In the first embodiment, the expansion valve


18


is a thermostatic expansion valve (TEV) in which the degree of opening of the valve is automatically regulated by a pressure difference. In the second embodiment, the expansion valve


18


is an electronically controlled expansion valve in which the degree of opening of the expansion valve


18


is variable under electronic control. In the third embodiment, the expansion valve


18


is an electronically controlled pulsed expansion valve which has only two states: fully open and closed. The flow rate through the pulsed expansion valve


18


is determined by the duty ratio between the open and closed states.




Superheat Control




The superheat at the outlet


24


is the temperature difference by which the temperature of the refrigerant exceeds the boiling point of the refrigerant at the outlet pressure. If the superheat is zero, the refrigerant is at or below boiling point and there will be liquid refrigerant present at the outlet


24


. It is important to prevent liquid refrigerant from entering and damaging the compressor


26


.




In the first embodiment shown in

FIG. 2

, the degree of opening of the expansion valve


18


is controlled thermostatically, as is well known in the art. In one example, a bulb


32


containing refrigerant of the same composition as that in the evaporator


8


is in thermal contact with the outlet


24


of the evaporator


8


and is connected through a capillary tube


33


to the expansion valve


18


. A spring-biased movable diaphragm within the expansion valve


18


is subject at one side to the pressure of the refrigerant in the bulb


32


and at the other side to the pressure of refrigerant at the inlet of the evaporator


8


. The position of a needle connected to the diaphragm determines the degree of opening of the expansion valve, so that the superheat at the outlet


24


is maintained constant at a predetermined level above zero. This arrangement is shown for example in GB 2302725.




In a second embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, the expansion valve


18


is controlled by an electrical signal on a line


20


connected to a controller


22


. The degree of opening of the expansion valve


18


is variable, and may be driven by a stepper motor. The controller


22


is preferably a programmable microcontroller with analog inputs and outputs, digital communications inputs and outputs, and memory for storing a program for implementing the algorithms described below and for temporary storage of working variables. The program may be stored on a carrier and loaded into the memory.




In the third embodiment shown in

FIG. 4

, the expansion valve


18


is controlled by a pulsed electrical signal on a line


20


connected to the controller


22


, which switches the expansion valve


18


between the open and the closed position with a duty cycle controlled by the controller


22


.




In the second embodiment, a superheat sensor


32


is provided at the outlet


24


of the evaporator


8


. The superheat sensor detects the degree of superheat of the refrigerant and outputs an electrical signal on a line


34


to the controller


22


, whereby the controller


22


detects whether the degree of superheat is at a predetermined level. The degree of opening, or duty cycle, of the expansion valve


18


is controlled to keep the detected level of superheat close to the predetermined level.




Suitable sensors


32


for detecting superheat are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,466 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,813,242, which are incorporated herein by reference. The superheat sensor


32


may be sensitive to the degree of superheat, or may only be able to detect when a threshold level of superheat has been reached, for example by detecting the presence of liquid refrigerant. Other methods may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the outlet pressure and temperature may be detected and may be used to calculate the degree of superheat, or a lookup table may be used to determine which values of pressure and temperature correspond to the predetermined level of superheat.




In the third embodiment, an approximate measure of superheat is derived from the difference between the temperature sensed by a first temperature sensor


35


at the outlet


24


and the temperature sensed by a second temperature sensor


37


at a point along the evaporator


8


upstream of the outlet


24


. Provided that the refrigerant is at boiling point at the upstream point and that the pressure at the upstream point does not differ greatly from that at the outlet


24


, the temperature difference is approximately equal to the superheat.




Temperature Control




A temperature sensor


28


senses the temperature outside the evaporator


8


. For example, as shown in

FIG. 1

, the temperature sensor


28


may be positioned to sense the external temperature T


E


around the evaporator


8


, the “air off” temperature T


1


of air leaving the duct


10


, the “air on” temperature T


2


of air entering the inlet


16


or the temperature T


3


of the storage area of the cabinet, or a combination of any of these. For example, the temperature sensor


28


may comprise two or more sensor devices arranged to detect temperatures at different locations cooled by the evaporator


8


.




In the first embodiment, the control apparatus includes an on/off valve


19


, such as a solenoid valve, which has a simple on-off operation to allow or prevent the flow of refrigerant into the evaporator


8


. The on/off valve is positioned upstream of the expansion valve


18


. The temperature sensor


28


acts as a thermostat controlling the on/off valve


19


directly through an electrical connection


30


. For example, the temperature sensor


28


may switch a current through a solenoid of the on/off valve


19


. If the sensed temperature rises above a predetermined maximum level, the temperature sensor


28


opens the on/off valve


19


. If the sensed temperature falls below a predetermined minimum level, the temperature sensor


28


closes the on/off valve


19


.




In the second embodiment, the temperature sensor


28


generates an electrical signal representing the sensed temperature on a line


30


, which is input to the controller


22


. If multiple temperatures are sensed, the input from each sensor device is input to the controller. The controller


22


compares the temperature or temperatures sensed by the temperature sensor


28


with a desired maximum and minimum temperature range programmed in the controller


22


through a communications interface. The controller


22


controls the state of the on/off valve


19


by an electrical signal on a line


21


. If the sensed temperature is above the desired maximum, the on/off valve


19


is opened and refrigerant flows through the expansion valve


18


and through the evaporator


8


.




The temperature control arrangement of the third embodiment differs from that of the second embodiment in that the on/off valve


19


is not present. Instead, the controller


22


maintains the pulsed expansion valve


18


closed if the sensed temperature is below the desired minimum and reverts to the pulsed operation of the expansion valve when the sensed temperature rises above the desired maximum.




In each embodiment, the expansion valve


18


is controlled, as described above, to keep the superheat at the outlet


24


of the evaporator


8


constant unless overridden by the temperature control process. If the temperature sensed by the temperature sensor


28


is below the desired minimum temperature, no refrigerant flows through the evaporator


8


and the superheat at the outlet


24


is not controlled. The sensed temperature will then rise until it exceeds the desired maximum temperature, whereupon the flow of refrigerant recommences and is controlled to keep the superheat constant at the outlet


24


.




Defrost Control Algorithm




The temperature and superheat control systems described above are, in themselves, easy to implement and commonly found in heat transfer systems. A novel defrost control algorithm, which can be used in conjunction with conventional superheat control systems, will now be described.




In the first and second embodiments, a flow meter


25


is positioned in the refrigeration circuit and outputs signals representing the flow rate of refrigerant through the circuit on a line


27


connected to the controller


22


. The flow meter


25


is connected between the condenser and the on/off valve


19


in the first embodiment, and between the on/off valve


19


and the expansion valve


18


in the second embodiment, so as to measure the flow of liquid refrigerant at high pressure. However, this type of flow meter may be positioned anywhere in the high pressure side of the refrigeration circuit.




Alternatively the flow meter


25


may be designed to measure the flow of refrigerant gas and is then positioned anywhere in the low pressure side of the circuit. The flow meter may be of the type having a propeller, positioned in the fluid flow, connected to a generator or position detector which outputs a signal indicating the flow rate.




As an alternative to the flow meter


25


in the first and second embodiments, a sensor may be used to detect the degree of opening of the expansion valve


18


, which is taken as an approximate measurement of flow, or is converted to an approximate flow rate using a look-up table.




In the third embodiment, the flow meter


25


is not present. Instead, the duty ratio of the pulsed expansion valve


18


is taken as representing the rate of flow. Since the pressure drop across the expansion valve


18


does not vary greatly, the duty ratio is a sufficiently good indicator of flow rate for the purposes of the defrost control algorithm. Alternatively, the flow meter


25


may be present in the third embodiment so that the rate of flow is measured directly rather than derived from other measurements. The measured flow rate is integrated over one or more duty cycles of the pulsed expansion valve


18


.




The defrost algorithm will now be described with reference to FIG.


5


. The algorithm starts once a defrost operation has been completed and a short period, such as 30 seconds, after the temperature control process permits the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator


8


. In the first embodiment, the controller


22


may detect the state of the on/off valve


19


indirectly by detecting whether any flow is measured by the flow meter


25


. In the second embodiment, the controller


22


controls the on/off valve


19


, while in the third embodiment the controller


22


determines whether to pulse or maintain closed the expansion valve


18


. In both the second and third embodiments, the controller


22


performs the temperature control process and determines internally whether the flow is switched on or off.




In steps S


10


to S


30


the controller


22


measures the flow rate F and integrates the measured value over each completed minute to give a total flow f


i


, where i is incremented from one to


16


. If the temperature control process interrupts the flow of refrigerant, the integrated value for the current minute is stored and the integration continues a short period, such as 30 seconds, after the flow of refrigerant resumes, until a total integration period of one minute is complete.




At step S


40


, when integrated flow values f


i


have been measured from 1 to 16, the controller


22


calculates the highest value but one a, the lowest value but one b, and the mean value c. At step S


50


, the means of the last four calculated values of each of a, b and c are calculated as A, B and C respectively. A volatility value V is calculated according to the following equation:









V
=


(

A
-
B

)

C





(
1
)













The mean of the volatility V since the last defrost until the present is calculated as the long-range volatility LRV. The ratio of V to LRV is calculated as R. A variable I is initially set to zero. When R is greater than 1 (step S


60


), the variable I is incremented by the amount by which R exceeds 1 (step S


70


). When R is less than or equal to 1, I is reset to zero (S


80


). When I reaches a predetermined level L (S


90


), the controller


22


initiates a defrost operation (S


100


). The algorithm repeats only after the defrost has actually been performed.




The value of the predetermined level L is preferably adjustable by an operator, to customise the defrost controller for a specific set of operating conditions. For this purpose, the controller


22


includes a communications interface which allows parameters to be set by a local or remote operator.




The value of the predetermined level L may be automatically varied by the controller


22


as a function of the cost of fuel used for defrosting at the current time of day. For example, electricity may be charged at a cheap night rate during defined night hours and a more expensive day rate during defined day hours. The controller may select a first, lower value of L during the defined night hours and a second, higher value of L during the defined day hours, so as preferentially to initiate a defrost during night hours while still allowing a defrost during the day if necessary.




In a specific example run over a period of approximately 174 hours, the mean value c is plotted in the graph of

FIG. 6

, while the values of V, LRV, R and I are plotted in the graph of

FIG. 7

, together with cabinet temperature C. In this example, the defrost was not initiated, to illustrate the effect of progressive frosting of the evaporator. Appropriate values of L can de deduced from the graphs; in the example illustrated in Table 1 below, L is set at 8 during the day and at either 6 or 8 during the night. The result of the defrost algorithm is illustrated for a maximum time before defrost of 48 hours and 72 hours, and for no maximum time between defrosts. For each of these settings, the date and time of defrost is marked with an ‘X’.












TABLE 1











Defrost Events



















Max 48




Max 72




No







Elapsed





Hours




Hours




Max




















Date




Time




Event




Time




I




8/6




8/8




8/6




8/8




8/8









9 Oct




05:17




Start




 0:00




0.00











9 Oct




13:17




Min time




 8:00




0.00






11




04:32




Defrost




47:15




6.10




X





X






Oct





required






11




05:17




Max




48:00




6.87





X






Oct





Time






12




05:17




Max




72:00




0.00







X






Oct





Time






12




19:17




Defrost




86:00




8.01








X






Oct





required














As can be seen from

FIG. 6

, the mean flow c through the evaporator steadily decreases after a defrost until a point (circled on the chart, in the afternoon of October 14) is reached at which the mean flow c declines sharply. At this point, the superheat control algorithm has become unstable; it is important that a defrost be performed before this occurs. Even in the case where there is no maximum time between defrosts, the defrost control algorithm would have initiated a defrost well before this time.




It is believed that the flow through the evaporator becomes unstable as the evaporator frosts up because of overshoot in the superheat control. Frost building up on the evaporator reduces the ability of the evaporator to extract heat from the thermal load, and the superheat at the outlet falls below the desired level. In response, the superheat control decreases the flow of refrigerant, but this causes the superheat to rise rapidly because of the thermal insulation between the evaporator and the thermal load. Hence, the insulating effect of the frost causes the level of superheat to respond more quickly to the variation in flow rate, which leads to overshoot. However, the invention is not limited to this effect, and other effects may additionally or alternatively be responsible for the instability of flow as the evaporator frosts up.




Since the variation in flow is caused by a variation in superheat at the outlet, the superheat may instead be measured by the defrost controller


22


and used as the input parameter of the defrost control algorithm. Any of the methods for measuring superheat as described above may be used for this purpose. For example, a superheat sensor may be used, or an approximate superheat measurement may be taken by measuring the difference in temperature between the outlet and a point along the evaporator upstream of the outlet.




Defrost Operation




In each of the illustrated embodiments, a defrost heater


36


is arranged around the evaporator


8


and can be electrically heated so as to defrost the evaporator


8


. The defrost heater


36


is switched on and off under the control of an electrical signal on a line


38


from the controller


22


.




When the controller


22


determines that the evaporator


8


should be defrosted, it switches on the defrost heater


36


. In the first and second embodiments, the controller


22


closes the on/off valve


19


for the duration of the defrost cycle. For this purpose in the first embodiment, the controller


22


is connected to the on/off valve


19


by a line


21


, so that the controller


22


can override the temperature sensor


28


to close the on/off valve


19


. In the third embodiment, the pulsed expansion valve


18


is held closed (zero duty ratio).




As an alternative to electrical defrosting, the air or gas methods, or other methods of defrosting an evaporator, may be used under the control of the controller


22


.




If less than a predetermined minimum time, such as eight hours, has elapsed since the last defrost, the controller


22


does not initiate a defrost, but continues to run the defrost algorithm. A defrost is initiated only when the value of I reaches the level L after the minimum time has elapsed.




A defrost may automatically be initiated if more than a maximum period, such as 2 or 3 days, has elapsed since the last defrost, since there is little incremental gain in defrosting at intervals greater than this maximum period.




In one example, in which the refrigerated display cabinet


2


is a stand-alone cabinet, the controller


22


begins the defrost cycle immediately on initiation of defrost.




Alternatively, the cabinet


2


may be one of an array of refrigerated cabinets, such as is used in a supermarket. In that case, there is a maximum number of display cabinets which can be defrosted at any one time, in order to limit the load on the defrosting system. The defrosting of cabinets is therefore coordinated to avoid exceeding this maximum number.




If a gas defrost method is used, the hot or cool gas may be distributed from a central plant room to the evaporators of the cabinets to be defrosted. The controller


22


is connected through a communications network to a remote defrost controller located in the plant room. The remote defrost controller controls the opening and closing of valves to direct the hot or cool gas to the evaporators selected for defrosting.




When a defrost is initiated for a specific refrigerated cabinet


2


, the controller


22


sends a signal to the remote defrost controller, which adds data representing the refrigerated cabinet


2


to a defrost queue. The remote defrost controller defrosts the cabinets in the order of the queue. In such a system, a delay is incurred between entering the cabinet on the defrost queue and defrosting of the evaporator


8


. However, the level L is chosen so as to cause initiation of a defrost a considerable time before the defrost becomes essential.




Alternatively, the hot or cool gas can be supplied through a ring main, separately from the normal supply of refrigerant. When the controller


22


initiates defrost, it opens a valve to connect the evaporator


8


to the ring main. The controller


22


of each display cabinet may be connected to a communications network so as to co-ordinate defrosting to avoid exceeding the maximum number of cabinets which are defrosted at any one time. In this case, the controller may initiate defrosting by sending a defrost request signal over the network and open the valve in response to a defrost control signal from the network.




To reduce the temperature shock and energy consumption caused by a defrost cycle, the defrost cycle should stop as soon as possible after all the ice on the evaporator


8


has melted. The temperature T


E


in the vicinity of the evaporator


8


is measured by the controller


22


and the defrost cycle is stopped when the temperature rises above a predetermined level, such as 15° C. If the temperature has not risen above this level after a predetermined period, then the defrost cycle is stopped.




Alternatively, the evaporator


8


may be isolated from the rest of the system and the pressure within the evaporator is measured. Provided the evaporator contains a mixture of liquid and gaseous refrigerant, the vapour pressure inside the evaporator


8


is used to determine the temperature of the evaporator. When this temperature has risen above a predetermined level, the defrost cycle is stopped. Alternatively, the defrost period is determined by a timer set so as to ensure that all the frost has melted, without causing too great a temperature shock.




Since the defrost cycle is only activated for a short time, the temperature of the cabinet contents does not rise sufficiently to cause spoiling of perishable goods.




Alternative embodiments




In the above embodiments, the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator is switched on and off to achieve the required temperature range of the thermal load. Alternatively, refrigerant may flow continuously through the evaporator, regulated by the expansion valve


18


to maintain the predetermined level of superheat at the outlet, to provide continuous cooling. Temperature control may then be achieved by switching on and off the flow of refrigerant through further evaporators which cool the same thermal load.




Alternatively, where precise temperature control is not required, the refrigeration cycle may be run continuously so that an equilibrium temperature is reached between the thermal load and the surroundings. The equilibrium temperature may fluctuate to some degree as the evaporator frosts up, which will also affect the flow rate of refrigerant needed to achieve the predetermined level of superheat at the outlet. The value of L is chosen to take account of this effect.




Although the above embodiments have been described with reference to a refrigerated display cabinet, it will be appreciated that the present invention is also applicable to any heat transfer system in which frequent defrosting of an evaporator


8


is required. For example, the present invention is also applicable to freezer display cabinets, cold rooms, blast chillers, blast freezers, air conditioners or heat pumps in which heat is extracted from ambient air or water in a heating system. In the case of heat pumps, the temperature of the thermal load which is warmed by the condenser may be sensed by the temperature sensor


28


and used to switch on and off the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator.



Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for controlling defrosting of an evaporator in a heat transfer system, including a defrost controller arranged to detect variation in a flow of refrigerant through the evaporator while the superheat at an outlet of the evaporator is maintained substantially at a predetermined level, to calculate a volatility of the flow as the variation over a period and to initiate defrosting of the evaporator on the basis of said calculated volatility.
  • 2. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, including a flow sensor arranged to sense the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to detect said variation in the flow by means of said flow sensor.
  • 3. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, including a superheat sensor arranged to detect the degree of superheat of refrigerant at the outlet of the evaporator, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to detect said variation in the flow by means of said superheat sensor.
  • 4. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the heat transfer system includes a valve arranged to regulate the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator, the defrost controller being arranged to detect said variation in the flow by detecting the state of the valve.
  • 5. Apparatus according to claim 1, including a first temperature sensor arranged to detect a first temperature of the refrigerant at the outlet and a second temperature sensor arranged to detect a second temperature of the refrigerant in the evaporator substantially upstream of the outlet, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to detect said variation in the flow as a function of the difference between the first and second temperatures.
  • 6. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to calculate a long-term average value of said volatility and to determine whether to initiate defrosting on the basis of said long-term average value and said calculated volatility.
  • 7. Apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said long-term value is calculated as the average value of said volatility since a preceding defrost.
  • 8. Apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to calculate the ratio of said calculated volatility and said long-term volatility, and to determine whether to initiate defrosting on the basis of said ratio.
  • 9. Apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the defrost controller is arranged to accumulate successive values by which the value of said ratio exceeds one, and to initiate defrosting if said accumulated successive values exceed a predetermined threshold.
  • 10. Apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said predetermined threshold is variable.
  • 11. Apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said predetermined threshold is variable as a function of time of day.
  • 12. Apparatus a claimed in claim 1, wherein the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator is selectively inhibited and allowed and the defrost controller is responsive to the flow of refrigerant detected while the flow of refrigerant is allowed through the evaporator.
  • 13. Apparatus as claimed in claim 12, wherein the flow switch is responsive to the one or more temperature sensors to inhibit the flow of refrigerant when a minimum temperature condition is reached and to allow the flow of refrigerant when a maximum temperature condition is reached.
  • 14. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the evaporator is arranged to extract heat from a display cabinet.
  • 15. A display cabinet including apparatus as claimed in claim 14.
  • 16. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the evaporator is arranged to extract heat from a cold room.
  • 17. A cold room including apparatus as claimed in claim 16.
  • 18. A method of controlling defrosting of an evaporator in a heat transfer system, including detecting variation in the flow of refrigerant through the evaporator while the superheat at an outlet of the evaporator is maintained substantially at a predetermined level, calculating a volatility of the flow as the variation of the flow over a period and initiating defrosting of the evaporator on the basis of the calculated volatility.
  • 19. A method according to claim 18, wherein said variation in the flow is detected by means of a flow sensor.
  • 20. A method according to claim 18, wherein said variation in the flow is detected by means of a superheat sensor.
  • 21. A method according to claim 18, wherein said variation in the flow is detected as a function of the difference in temperature between the outlet of the evaporator and a point along the evaporator substantially upstream of the outlet.
  • 22. A method according to claim 18, including calculating a long-term average value of said volatility and determining whether to initiate defrosting on the basis of said long-term average value and said calculated volatility.
  • 23. A method according to claim 22, wherein said long-term value is calculated as the average value of said volatility since a preceding defrost.
  • 24. A method according to claim 22, including calculating the ratio of said calculated volatility and said long-term volatility, and determining whether to initiate defrosting on the basis of said ratio.
  • 25. A method according to claim 24, including accumulating successive values by which the value of said ratio exceeds one, and initiating defrosting if said accumulated successive values exceed a predetermined threshold.
  • 26. A method according to claim 25, wherein said predetermined threshold is variable.
  • 27. A method according to claim 26, wherein said predetermined threshold is variable as a function of time of day.
  • 28. A carrier bearing a sequence of electronically encoded and readable instructions to perform the method of claim 18 when executed by a defrost controller in said heat transfer system.
  • 29. A computer program arranged to perform the method of claim 18 when executed by a defrost controller in said heat transfer system.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0101324 Jan 2001 GB
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to Great Britain application No. 0101324.2 filed Jan. 18, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
4993233 Borton et al. Feb 1991 A
5046324 Otoh et al. Sep 1991 A
5379608 Ishimaru et al. Jan 1995 A
5528908 Bahel et al. Jun 1996 A
5727395 Guo et al. Mar 1998 A
5813242 Lawrence et al. Sep 1998 A
6138464 Derosier et al. Oct 2000 A
6205800 Topper et al. Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
0501387 Feb 1992 EP
0816783 Jan 1998 EP
0893663 Jan 1999 EP
2674010 Sep 1992 FR
2302725 Jan 1997 GB
2348947 Oct 2000 GB