Not Applicable.
This disclosure relates generally to grain milling and more particularly to a degerminator and a method for degerminating grain such as corn.
In a conventional corn milling process, corn is first introduced to a cleaning station wherein foreign materials such as stones, sticks, sand and foreign seeds are removed. The grain is then subjected to a water wash for removal of dirt and other foreign materials. Next, a tempering step is utilized to condition the grain for the subsequent grinding operations. The tempering procedure allows the whole kernel grain to absorb moisture and thereby magnifies the different grinding characteristics of the grain components. Since moisture is absorbed primarily through the germ tip of the grain, the tempering procedure normally lasts for about one and up to several hours depending upon the end product desired and the age and moisture content of the grain being processed. Tempering is achieved in a single or several steps over given time periods using simple water absorption or a combination of water and heat as hot water or steam.
The tempering process results in the relatively highly absorptive germ and bran becoming tough and pliable as these components take on water. On the other hand, the endosperm, which absorbs moisture much more slowly, will remain relatively unchanged although somewhat less brittle. This procedure also helps to commence parting of the endosperm from the germ and bran components.
The next step in the conventional process is to pass the tempered grain to a degerminator which breaks the whole kernel grain in a manner to achieve initial separation of germ, bran and endosperm. By far the most widely used type of degerminator is the Beall degerminator which is well known to those in the trade and which generally requires tempering of the grain to a moisture level of from 19% to 25%, depending on the degree of degermination and debranning sought. Also used at times is an impact type degerminator which generates less fines although the degree of germ separation is reduced in comparison to the Beall machine. In any case, the design of the degerminator is such that the germ is intended to be broken out from the endosperm to the extent possible without excessively grinding the germ component. Consideration is given to bran removal in this step depending on the final use of the end product. The goal of the degerminator, namely to remove the germ without grinding it unduly, is not actually reached with existing degerminators, and an additional problem is that low quality fines are produced which must be removed prior to further processing of the stock.
The degree of separation of germ from endosperm that is achieved with conventional degerminating machines is lacking somewhat and this incompleteness of the degermination causes many of the problems that are encountered in the overall milling process. In the Beall degerminator, which is used extensively in the United States, the grain kernels are rubbed more against one another than against the metal of the machine. As a consequence, even though relatively good separation of the germ is achieved, a large quantity of fines is generated and the fines are high in fat content since they contain much germ.
Impact type degerminators are used for specific purposes such as where finished products having high fat content are acceptable (table meal) and where smaller granulation of the finished products is involved (no large grits). The impact degerminators that have been used in the past generate fewer fines than the Beall degerminator and provide higher yields of recovered oil; however, the separation of the germ that is achieved with impact machines is poor and for this reason they have not been widely used. Most degerminators that have been proposed or used in the past break the germ, and the quality of the product is thus reduced in comparison to products in which the germ is in a whole condition.
Other types of degerminators, invented by R. James Giguere, are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,189,503; 4,301,183; 4,365,546; and 5,250,313. The degerminators described in these patents crush corn kernels from their thin edges to separate the germ and endosperm without damaging the germ. While the degerminators described in these patents are revolutionary, there is room for improving the degerminators to maximize efficiency.
Generally the product out of the degerminator is separated into “tail” and “thru” streams, the former being relatively rich in endosperm and the latter being relatively rich in germ and bran. The two streams are then dried and cooled to reduce the moisture content to approximately 17%. Prior to commencing the grinding steps, the two degerminator streams are preferably placed on gravity tables (or aspirators) to achieve some further initial sorting out of germ and endosperm.
The roll grinders in the conventional milling process are set up in two series. One series is for the endosperm rich streams and the other series is for the germ rich streams. The concept utilized in each series of roller mills in the conventional milling process is to match particle size with individual roller mill characteristics. Thus, relatively large particles from the gravity tables (or aspirators) are directed to the first break and germ rollers respectively, according to particle size classification. These first rollers are characterized by relatively large corrugations with inherent coarse grinding characteristics. The smaller particles from the gravity tables are directed according to the successively finer series of rollers. For example, the stock going to the number one break roll may be that passing through a sieve with 3.5 wires per inch and over one with 5 wires per inch. The roller corrugation used for this stock is 6 per inch. Next, stock passing through a 5 wires per inch mesh but passing over one with 8 per inch is passed to a break roll with 8 corrugations per inch of roll circumference. The procedure is continued up to rolls with 20-24 corrugations per inch.
In general, rollers grinding the streams rich in endosperm have a higher roll speed differential than those grinding the germ rich streams, the reason being that the relatively fragile germ requires the gentler treatment afforded by a lower roll speed differential. This is the reason that two series of roller mills are employed.
Because of the different grinding characteristics of the components, as discussed above, the roller mills in each series will proceed to reduce the size of the endosperm relative to the size of the germ and bran. The mill stock that does not meet final product specification (excepting moisture) is continuously reclassified by size, aspirated to remove bran, and then passed to the next roller mill which is set up to receive the stock according to its primary component and particle size. The process is repeated over and over until the desired separating and sorting is accomplished.
The final steps in the conventional milling process are to dry the milled grain to a maximum moisture content of approximately 12% or to marketing and end use specifications, cool it, and aspirate off any remaining bran. The end product is then graded according to size into various component products.
One embodiment of the present disclosure is directed toward a degerminator having a base, a plate with a plurality of protrusions, and a clamp that engages the plate and is coupled to the base to removably secure the plate to the base. The plate preferably has a first edge surface that engages the base, a second edge surface that engages the clamp, and a working surface that includes the protrusions. No mounting holes preferably extend through the working surface. A second plate is preferably clamped to a second base with a second clamp that engages the second plate and is coupled to the second base. The second plate has protrusions that face the protrusions of the plate. By securing the plate to the base with a clamp, no mounting holes are needed in the working surface of the plate, which means that the entire working surface may be configured for fracturing grain such as corn.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a degerminator having a first plate assembly, an enclosure that at least partially surrounds the first plate assembly, and a second plate assembly. The first plate assembly has a plurality of protrusions that face a plurality of protrusions of the second plate assembly. The second plate assembly has a seal with a channel that is configured to receive a fluid for moving the seal between a deflated position and an inflated position. The second plate assembly is movable between a first position, in which the second plate assembly does not engage the enclosure, and a second position, in which the seal engages the enclosure when the seal is in the inflated position. The first plate assembly and second plate assembly preferably each include a base, a plate, and a clamp as described above. The seal is preferably configured to remain in engagement with the enclosure while the second plate assembly moves relative to the first plate assembly so that adjustments may be made to the height of a gap between the second plate assembly and first plate assembly while the seal is still engaged.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure includes a degerminator having a frame, a first plate assembly that is rotatably coupled to the frame, a second plate assembly, a plurality of supports each coupled to one of the frame and the second plate assembly, a plurality of guides each coupled to one of the frame and the second plate assembly, and a plurality of actuators each coupled to both the frame and the second plate assembly. The first plate assembly has a plurality of protrusions that face a plurality of protrusions of the second plate assembly. Each of the guides receives one of the supports. The actuators are operable to move the second plate assembly relative to the first plate assembly. The first plate assembly and second plate assembly preferably each include a base, a plate, and a clamp as described above. The second plate assembly preferably includes a seal that engages an enclosure of the frame as described above. The guides, supports, and actuators preferably enable the first plate assembly and second plate assembly to remain aligned in desired planes as the second plate assembly is moved relative to the first plate assembly, such that all portions of the second plate assembly move an equal distance at the same time and the second plate assembly does not rotate as it moves.
Another embodiment of the invention described herein is directed to a degerminator having a side wall surrounding a chamber, a plate that has a plurality of protrusions and that is at least partially positioned in the chamber, and a removable wear ring that is at least partially positioned between the side wall and the plate within the chamber. The wear ring preferably has an upper flange that is configured to be supported by a top of the side wall, and the wear ring is preferably configured to be moved vertically upward to remove it from the chamber. The wear ring preferably protects the side wall from abrasive grain particles that are fractured by the protrusions of the plate and that are expelled radially outward from the plate toward the side wall. The wear ring may be replaced when the grain particles have worn it down to an undesirable level.
Additional aspects of the invention, together with the advantages and novel features appurtenant thereto, will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned from the practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
A degerminator in accordance with the present disclosure is identified generally in
Frame 12 provides a stable base to which the remaining components of degerminator 10 are mounted. Frame 12 includes vertical legs 24a-d, horizontal lower braces 26a-d each joined to a pair of adjacent legs 24a-d, horizontal upper braces 28a-d (
Frame 12 includes a drive assembly mount 42 (
Frame 12 also includes three lower actuator mounts, one of which is identified as 50 in
A wear ring 54, shown in
Drive assembly 20, shown in
Lower plate assembly 14, shown in
Lower base 80 includes a generally circular lower section 90 and a conical upper section 92 that is joined to lower section 90 via bolts (not shown) threaded in aligned openings, one pair of which is identified as 94 and 96. Lower section 90 is joined to spindle 68 with bolts, one of which is identified in
As shown in
Upper section 92 includes a conical outer surface 114 integral with and extending upward from circular base 104. Conical outer surface 114 extends upward to a tip 116 (
As shown in
Outer edge surface 128 angles radially outward away from a center of lower plate assembly 14 as outer edge surface 128 moves downward toward lower base 80. An angled surface 134 of clamp 84 is configured to mate with outer edge surface 128 in a non-vertical plane. Angled surface 134 angles radially outward away from a center of lower plate assembly 14 as angled surface 134 moves downward toward lower base 80. Clamp 84 has an opening 136 (
As shown in
Clamps 84 are designed to secure lower plate 82 to lower base 80 such that there are no mounting holes in lower plate 82 that extend through the working surface 130 of lower plate 82. Therefore, the entire working surface 130 is available for configuration to engage and fracture corn kernels 118, and there are no unwanted holes or depressions in the working surface 130 to trap corn particles or disrupt the fracturing process. Preferably, and as shown in the drawings, there are no mounting holes formed in any surface of lower plate 82.
Spacers 86 are positioned between adjacent clamps 84, as shown in
Referring to
Upper plate assembly 16 includes a box frame 160, shown in
Each of spacers 164 is mounted to box frame 160 with a bolt, one of which is identified as 178 in
As shown in
Referring to
Box frame 160 includes three upper actuator mounts, one of which is identified as 202 in
Referring to
As shown in
Upper plate 166 is substantially similar to lower plate 82 and as such is only described herein to the extent necessary to describe how upper plate 166 is mounted to upper base 162. Upper plate 166 is formed from six sections, in a similar manner as lower plate 82, and upper plate 166 has corrugations 224 (
Upper plate 166 is annular with an inner edge surface 226, an outer edge surface 228, and a working surface 230 extending between the inner edge surface 226 and the outer edge surface 228. A portion of the inner edge surface 226 is received within recess 222. Inner edge surface 226 mates with lower edge surface 220 of upper base 162 in a non-vertical plane. Inner edge surface 226 angles radially outward away from a center of upper plate assembly 16 as inner edge surface 226 moves downward away from recess 222, such that a lower portion of inner edge surface 226 is positioned radially outward farther than an upper portion of inner edge surface 226.
Outer edge surface 228 angles radially inward toward a center of upper plate assembly 16 as outer edge surface 228 moves downward away from upper base 162. An angled surface 232 of clamp 167 is configured to mate with outer edge surface 228 in a non-vertical plane. Angled surface 167 angles radially inward toward a center of upper plate assembly 16 as angled surface 167 moves downward away from upper base 162. Clamp 167 is substantially similar to clamp 84 shown in
In a similar manner as described above for lower plate 82, one of clamps 167 is positioned in the center of each of the sections of upper plate 166, and one of clamps 167 is positioned where adjacent sections of upper plate 166 meet. Each of clamps 167 that is positioned where adjacent sections of upper plate 166 meet engages both of the adjacent sections to clamp both of the adjacent sections to upper base 162. Clamping each of the sections of upper plate 166 to upper base 162 in three locations in the manner described herein ensures that the working surfaces 230 of the sections of upper plate 166 are aligned in the same plane with each other. Even if the working surfaces 230 of the sections of upper plate 166 are slightly warped or bowed due to manufacturing imperfection, clamps 167 secure the sections of upper plate 166 to upper base 162 in a manner that flexes the sections of upper plate 166 to ensure that the working surface 230 presented by all of the sections of upper plate 166 in combination is aligned and continuous. Thus, there are preferably no ridges in working surface 230 at the locations where the sections of upper plate 166 meet. Working surface 230 may be planar and horizontal or shaped as part of a conical surface that is angled upwardly or downwardly as it extends radially outward. Clamps 167 may be removed to replace the sections of upper plate 166 that are worn or to replace sections with sections having a larger or smaller diameter, as described in more detail below with respect to
Clamps 167 are designed to secure upper plate 166 to upper base 162 such that there are no mounting holes in upper plate 166 that extend through the working surface 230 of upper plate 166. Therefore, the entire working surface 230 is available for configuration to engage and fracture corn kernels 118, and there are no unwanted holes or depressions in the working surface 230 to trap corn particles or disrupt the fracturing process. Preferably, and as shown in the drawings, there are no mounting holes formed in any surface of upper plate 166.
As shown in
When seal 234 is inflated and it engages wear ring 54, upper plate assembly 16 may be moved vertically approximately 0.25 inches in either direction to adjust the gap 120 (
Seal 234 is mounted to circular plate 204 with a plurality of seal clamps, one of which is identified as 246. Seal clamp 246 is generally L-shaped with a horizontal section 248 that abuts an upper surface of circular plate 204 and a vertical section 250 that is positioned within a groove 252 formed between vertical surface 236 and torus-shaped section 240 of seal 234. Horizontal section 248 has an opening that is aligned with an opening in circular plate 204; the aligned openings receive a bolt 254.
A wiper seal 256 is mounted to circular plate 204 beneath seal 234. Wiper seal 256 is generally annular and extends around the entire diameter of circular plate 204. Wiper seal 256 may be formed in a plurality of sections that are each joined to circular plate 204. Wiper seal 256 includes an opening that is aligned with the openings in seal clamp 246 and circular plate 204. Bolt 254 threads into the opening in wiper seal 256. Wiper seal 256 extends radially outward beyond the peripheral edge of circular plate 204 beneath seal 234 to protect seal 234. Wiper seal 256 has an outer diameter that is substantially equal to the inner diameter of wear ring 54 such that wiper seal 256 engages wear ring 54. As wiper seal 256 is lowered into wear ring 54, wiper seal 256 scrapes corn particles and contaminants from wear ring 54 to protect seal 234 from damage. Wiper seal 256 is preferably formed from a rigid material such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.
A seal protector 258 is mounted to circular plate 204 beneath wiper seal 256. Seal protector 258 is generally annular and extends around the entire diameter of circular plate 204. Seal protector 258 may be formed in a plurality of sections that are each joined to circular plate 204. Seal protector 258 includes an opening that is aligned with the openings in seal clamp 246, wiper seal 256, and circular plate 204. Bolt 254 threads into the opening in seal protector 258. Seal protector 258 is preferably formed from metal.
With reference to
Referring to
Control system 22 (
Side wall 34 (
In operation, an operator accesses control system 22 and instructs the control system 22 to turn on actuators 18a-c to move upper plate assembly 16 into a position in which the gap 120 (
The conical outer surface 114 and conical shaped surface 218 are preferably configured and spaced apart from each other during operation to guide corn kernels 118 into the gap 120 in a single, horizontal plane. In other words, when corn kernels 118 enter gap 120, side surface 266 is horizontal and corn kernels 118 are not stacked on top of each other. Concave, conical outer surface 114 and convex, conical shaped surface 218 oppose each other and are spaced apart a distance to facilitate the corn kernels 118 entering the gap 120 in a single, horizontal plane. Because the corn kernels 118 enter the gap 120 in a single, horizontal plane, the corn kernels 118 do not grind against themselves, i.e., individual corn kernels 118 do not grind against other individual corn kernels 118. By substantially preventing the corn kernels 118 from grinding against each other, the degerminator 10 releases each of the germs of the corn kernels 118 in a substantially whole, undamaged condition.
As lower plate assembly 14 rotates, corrugations 160 move in the direction indicated by the directional arrow in
Continued motion of lower plate 82 relative to upper plate 166 subjects the kernel 118 caught between the corrugations 160 and 224 to a compressive crushing force that is applied from opposed side edges 268a and 268d or 268a and 268c of the kernel 118 toward the center. The magnitude of this crushing force is sufficient to fracture the endosperm under and around the germ 262 to thereby squeeze or pop the germ 262 out of the side 266 of the kernel 118 in a substantially whole, undamaged condition. The crushing action terminates when the corrugations 160 and 224 move past one another. Since the released germ 262 is small enough to pass freely between the ridges 160b and 224b of the corrugations 160 and 224, the germ 262 is not crushed and is carried outwardly by centrifugal force along with the fragments of the endosperm 264 resulting from the crushing action toward side wall 34. The fractured corn particles exit the gap 120 between lower plate 82 and upper plate 166 adjacent side wall 34 and move downwardly through one of exit chutes 38 and 40 for further processing as described below in connection with
The corn kernel 118 may be tempered prior to the degermination, although tempering is not essential. The amount of whole and relatively undamaged germ 262 that is released and the extent to which the germ 262 and endosperm 264 are separated is a function of a number of factors, including the moisture content of the germ 262, the type and condition of the corn kernel 118, the configuration of the corrugations 160 and 224, the distance between corrugations 160 and 224, or combinations of these and other factors.
Exemplifying the improved results obtained by the degerminating method of this disclosure, it has been found that midwestern hybrid corn of about 12% moisture and average condition and age yields approximately 85% whole germ 262 and slightly more than 95% separation of germ and endosperm. Tempering the same type of corn to about 17% moisture content for about 3 hours increases the yield to about 95% whole germ and about 97% complete separation of germ and endosperm. The degerminator fines that will pass through a 16 mesh screen vary in quantity from a high of about 20% of the corn degerminated to a low of about 10%, and from a fat content of about 1% to about 5%, depending on the tempering process, the moisture content of the germ and endosperm, the kind of corn, the condition and age of the corn, the relative speed of rotation of lower plate 82 and upper plate 166, the spacing between the lower plate 82 and upper plate 166, the configuration and arrangement of the corrugations 160 and 224, and the condition of the working surfaces 130 and 230.
Although the degerminator 10 is similar in construction to a conventional attrition mill, the operational characteristics differ considerably. The main difference is that the lower plate 82 and upper plate 166 are carefully spaced and the corrugations 160 and 224 are arranged to achieve only a crushing effect on the kernel 118 which is applied only from the opposite thin edges 268a-d inwardly toward the center, in contrast to the grinding and cutting action of an attrition mill. Since lower plate 82 and upper plate 166 are spaced apart such that a corn kernel 118 oriented with its flat sides 266 parallel to the planes of the plates 82 and 166 passes freely between the ridges 160b and 224b of the corrugations 160 and 224, the degerminator 10 avoids crushing the corn kernels 118 from the relatively large flat sides 266 thereof, thus assuring that the crushing occurs only at the thin edges 268a-d in a manner to squeeze the germ 262 free of the endosperm 264.
In addition to the effectiveness of the germ separation, the process of the present disclosure separates the bran 265 from the endosperm 264 with excellent results. As the moisture content of the bran 265 increases, its separation becomes more complete. It has been found that if dry corn of about 14% moisture is tempered for 4 to 8 minutes with addition of water of about 2% to 8% by weight of the corn kernels 118, 90% to 98% of the bran 265 is removed by the degerminating process as a result of the crushing forces applied to the corn kernels 118. The degree of debranning is affected by the kind and condition of the corn kernels 118, the amount of water and heat added and the length of time held, the speed of the lower plate 82, and the configuration of corrugations 160 and 224. Since on a practical level only the bran 265 is tempered and not the remainder of the corn kernels 118, drying is simplified because only the bran 265 needs to be sorted out by screens and/or aspiration and sent to dryers. Conventional methods of debranning require tempering of the germ 262 also and/or separate equipment to perform this function. In carrying out the method of the present disclosure, the power requirements are about 2.5 HP per hour per ton of corn, as compared with requirements of conventional processes of from 15 to 25 HP per hour per ton of corn for degerming and debranning.
Another important result obtained by the degerminating process of this disclosure is the relatively high quality of the degerminator fines which, as previously indicated, have a fat content of about 1% to 5%. In comparison, the fines generated in conventional degerminating processes are so high in fat that they are either sold as a low value byproduct animal feed or are reprocessed to upgrade their quality. Such reprocessing involves the use of sifter, aspirators, gravity tables, purifiers or various combinations of these and other costly devices. Upgrading the quality of the fines with such devices allows the fines to move into industrial uses or other markets where they yield a higher price than animal feed but a lower price than prime products from the mill. In addition, separation of the fines from the prime product is costly and time consuming.
The present disclosure also provides improved grain milling processes which are illustrated in flow sheet form in
Referring first to
Tempering of the grain may be carried out in advance of the prebreak or after the prebreak, or both. Tempering before the prebreak better controls the germ separation. For example, corn having a moisture content of 15% to 20% by weight will, when broken, provide better release of the germ with a corresponding reduction in fines and fat content than corn having a moisture content below about 15%. The tempering can be carried out using known techniques.
Tempering after prebreaking may be carried out if the moisture content of the germ and bran was not adjusted by a tempering step prior to prebreak, or if additional moisture adjustment is necessary or desired after prebreak. The moisture content of the germ and bran prior to passage of the stock to the first roller mill should be about 15% to 35% by weight. Tempering after prebreak results in an appreciable shortening of the tempering time because the prebreaking exposes the germ and bran. Tempering can be as short as 2 minutes if heat is used and in no case will it exceed about 30 minutes when performed subsequent to prebreak.
Although a main advantage of the process of this disclosure is that it avoids the need to remove fines prior to milling, it may be desirable in some instances to remove the fines after prebreak and before milling in order to reduce the water requirements for the tempering step. This can be done in a sifter which sifts the stock after prebreak and before tempering if tempering occurs only after prebreak. The fines are then separated and returned to the stock after it has been tempered and passed through the first set of break rolls if this is desirable to simplify the flow.
The present disclosure departs from the technique of the conventional grain milling process which, as previously indicated, attempts to match particle size with individual roller mill characteristics. In the conventional gradual reduction process, the particles are first passed through roller mills having relatively large corrugations and then to successive additional roller mills having increasingly finer corrugations. It has heretofore been thought that any attempt to utilize rollers having fine corrugations at the front end of the mill would result in smashing of the grain kernels which would make ultimate separation of germ, bran and endosperm exceedingly difficult.
Instead of passing the grain through a long succession of rollers as is done in the conventional process, grinding is accomplished in the present disclosure by passing the broken grain directly to fine rollers of the type that normally characterize only the end of a differential milling process.
In accordance with the disclosure, the prebreaking and tempering steps are effected, and the grain is then passed through a first set of break rolls which may be of the modified Dawson type having 16 to 20 corrugations per inch and a spiral of about ½ inch per linear foot. The rollers are arranged dull to dull and have a differential roll speed of between approximately 1.1-1.4:1, more preferably between approximately 1.2-1.35:1, and most preferably the ratio is approximately 1.3:1. The first break roller mill is adjusted so that at least approximately 50% of the product through is small enough to pass through a U.S. #12 sieve. The spacing between the rollers is sufficient to substantially prevent appreciable penetration of the roller corrugations into the germ, thereby avoiding size reduction of the germ in contrast to the conventional practice of placing fine rollers closer together in accordance with the fine particles being processed. Each particle from the prebreak mill is large enough that it is subjected to grinding action when passed between the rollers of the first break mill and those of the second break mill. The first set of break rolls may have a structure and operate in the same manner as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,447, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Due to the fineness of the roller corrugations and their spacing, the endosperm is severely and abruptly ground up and thereby separated from the germ and bran without resulting in the germ being fractured excessively. The product from the first break rolls, together with the fines if they have been removed prior to temper, is sifted through a U.S. #8 sieve and a U.S. #12 sieve. The relatively large size particles over the #8 sieve are primarily germ and bran and may be directed to feed or oil recovery or to further processing as described below. The portion passing through the #12 screen is less than 1% in fat content, and it is therefore passed to finish product. Particles through the #8 screen but over the #12 screen are principally endosperm, although there is enough germ present that this portion is not marketable as a prime product. This portion is passed to a second set of break rolls which effect further size reduction of the endosperm and which further separate the endosperm from the germ and bran components.
The rollers of the second break mill have corrugations of the same size as the first set or slightly smaller, and the spacing between the rolls is again sufficient to avoid excessive penetration of the germ. Preferably, there are between approximately 20 to 30 corrugations per inch on each roller in the second break mill. The differential speed of the rollers in the second break mill is between approximately 1.1-1.4:1, more preferably between approximately 1.2-1.35:1, and most preferably the ratio is approximately 1.3:1. The second set of break rolls may have a structure and operate in the same manner as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,447. After passing through the second set of break rolls, the product is sifted through a #14 wire. The particles over the wire are rich in germ and bran and go to animal feed or oil recovery. The stock passing through the wire is rich in endosperm and goes to finished product along with the endosperm rich stock from the first break mill. The endosperm rich stream is dried and cooled if necessary and is finally passed to a grading station where grits and meal are graded according to a size and any remaining bran is removed by aspiration.
The free germ may be removed prior to the first break rolls by utilizing gravity tables. This optional step lowers the fat content of the throughs from the sifter wires, and it aids in making the milling process superior to conventional processes both in quality and product yield.
Although the specific operating parameters for the process depend upon the age of the grain, its moisture content and grade, and the end product desired, it has been found, by way of example, that U.S. grade #2 corn having a moisture content of 13% yields approximately 62% brewer's grits on a U.S. #30 sieve at 1% maximum oil, 8% meal through a U.S. #30 sieve at less than 1.5% oil, 3% flour through a U.S. #80 sieve at about 2% maximum oil, and a brewer's extract on the grits of 80.5% as is basic and prescribed by the American Association of Brewing Chemist Methods. The total prime product yield is 73%. In comparison, a typical yield of equal quality products from a conventional process is 47% brewer's grits, 9% meal and 5% flour. The total prime product yield is 63% in the conventional process. In addition to providing a higher yield in the more valuable brewer's grits, the process of this disclosure yields a cereal grit and flour product of higher quality because of a reduction in “black specks.” This is attributable to the reduced grinding which leaves most of the germ tip (black speck) attached to the bran or germ, although the extent to which this occurs decreases with a diminishing of the tempering.
The degerminator stock is passed to a degerminator sifter which grades it into four streams containing particles of different size. A first stream consists of relatively large particles of whole corn or incompletely degerminated pieces of corn. It may not be necessary to separate out this first stream or fraction, depending on the scalp sieve size, the degerminator setting, the condition of the corn, and/or the object of the milling operation. The first stream is recycled or passed again through the degerminator.
The bulk of the degerminator stock is the second coarsest fraction which contains bran, the whole germ and the larger broken germ particles, as well as the pieces of broken endosperm passing over the second sieve. Depending upon a variety of factors, the second sieve can be from 5 to 9 mesh. The second fraction is passed to gravity table #1 where the germ and bran are sorted from the endosperm and directed to feed or oil recovery. If large quantities of corn are being processed so that sheer volume requires the use of a number of gravity tables, more efficient gravity table operation can be obtained by closer sizing of stream #2 into several streams and/or employing aspiration prior to passing the streams to the gravity tables. This will upgrade the finished product in both quality and quantity.
The third fraction includes broken germ, endosperm and bran normally making up between 5% and 25% of the total weight of the corn. This stream goes to gravity table #2 which sorts the germ and bran from the endosperm and directs them to animal feed or an oil recovery system. The endosperm is combined with the endosperm rich stream from gravity table #1 and passed to break rolls having fine corrugations that may be identical with those of the first break roll mill described in connection with the process of
In a grits grade sifter, most of the germ and bran still remaining in the stock are scalped off and directed to feed or oil recovery. The scalp sieve is about 10 to 16 mesh, depending upon the mesh of the sieve for the fourth fraction from the degerminator sifter. The grits grade sifter size classifies the remainder of the roller mill stock which is aspirated conventionally.
It has been found that with U.S. Grade #2 corn having a moisture content of 13%, the process of
Referring now to
If a particularly high quantity of whole germ is desired from the degerminator or if a small amount of fines and low fat is sought, the grain is tempered after being cleaned and before degermination. Tempering at this point produces high yields and oil quality as compared to the process of
Degermination is effected by the degerminator 10 described above, and the degerminator stock is fed to a degerminator sifter which provides four fractions as in the process of
After tempering of the #3 fraction, it is combined with the endosperm rich grit stream from the gravity table of fraction #2, and the combined streams are then sent to fine break rolls which may be identical with those employed in the process of
Minimal tempering yields results similar to and usually somewhat better than are obtained with the process of
After the corn is cleaned, it is tempered using water, hot water, and/or steam and is held long enough for the moisture to penetrate and loosen the bran. Unlike the conventional debranning processes which require tempering of the entire kernel, only the bran is tempered and the tempering time is reduced appreciably as a result. After tempering, the grain is degerminated by the degerminator 10 described previously, resulting in the germ being separated from the endosperm and the endosperm being crushed out of the pliable tempered bran.
The degerminator stock is sifted by the degerminator sifter wherein the top or coarsest fraction is scalped off and passed through an aspiration to remove the bran. The bran that is removed may be sent to a dryer if necessary before it is directed to animal feed or to another use. Undegerminated corn or large particles that need to be degermed and/or debranned are recycled from the aspirator back to the degerminator.
The remaining fractions from the degerminator sifter are separated according to size and according to market and/or use objectives and efficient gravity table operation. These fractions are sent to gravity tables which may be preceded by aspirators depending upon the desired efficiency of the gravity tables for separating the grain for drying or other reasons. The aspirating, sifting and gravity table operations are carried out conventionally. It has been found that for particularly efficient bran removal, most of the bran is scalped off in the recycle fraction from the degerminator sifter.
The process of
In each of the processes of the present disclosure, the fines from the degerminator are relatively low in fat content since the germ is maintained in a substantially whole condition. Accordingly, the fines are high enough in quality that they can remain in the prime product stock and need not be separated out and send to feed as is necessary in the conventional milling process. It is also apparent that fewer steps are required in the milling process of this disclosure as a result primarily of the high degree of degermination and debranning that is achieved in the degerminating process.
The processes illustrated in
By virtue of the reduced number of steps required, the process of this disclosure permits the overall size of the mill to be reduced substantially. Also, the reduction in the amount of equipment provides considerable economy and decreases the maintenance and repair requirements. Since the process stock does not need to be sifted repeatedly as is necessary in the conventional gradual reduction method of milling, only a relatively small amount of sifter cloth is required. Fewer roller mills are needed, and the reduced length of the flow path correspondingly reduces the need for conveying equipment. Further economic benefits result from the reduced power requirements and the decreased need for heating, cooling and drying equipment. The simplicity of the processes has the added benefit of reducing the level of skill and training necessary to operate a mill in which the processes are carried out.
While the processes have been described with particular reference to corn milling, they find application also in connection with other grains such as wheat and grain sorghum. Manifestly, with a much smaller sized grain such as milo, rollers having finer corrugations are utilized to achieve the desired separation of components in a minimum number of steps.
The processes of this disclosure may find application for “clean up” of a stream of broken grain in a conventional milling process. It should also be apparent in connection with the process of
By virtue of the economic benefits obtained by using the milling processes of the present disclosure, dry milling techniques may be extended into areas that have heretofore been thought to be economically impractical. For example, since yields of prime products over 70% are obtained with fat content as low as 0.4%, it is practical to apply the dry milling processes to replace the long, extensive steeping step employed in the wet milling of corn, thereby shortening the process and cutting costs. Another economic advantage of the present disclosure is the high rate of germ recovery which results in a higher oil yield per bushel of corn than is obtained with conventional dry milling processes.
From the foregoing it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all ends and objectives herein-above set forth, together with the other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the invention.
Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be understood that all matters herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted as illustrative, and not in a limiting sense.
While specific embodiments have been shown and discussed, various modifications may of course be made, and the invention is not limited to the specific forms or arrangement of parts and steps described herein, except insofar as such limitations are included in the following claims. Further, it will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.
This application is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/198,442, filed on Jul. 29, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
416371 | Millot | Dec 1889 | A |
3734752 | Headley | May 1973 | A |
4189503 | Giguere | Feb 1980 | A |
4301183 | Giguere | Nov 1981 | A |
4365546 | Giguere | Dec 1982 | A |
5036757 | Mueller | Aug 1991 | A |
5250313 | Giguere | Oct 1993 | A |
8113447 | Giguere | Feb 2012 | B1 |
20080260902 | Van Houten | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
143767 | Jun 1902 | DE |
143 767 | Aug 1903 | DE |
642 219 | Feb 1937 | DE |
10 2010 050 793 | Apr 2012 | DE |
200204877 | Feb 2003 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Theodore E. Stiver, Jr., “American Corn Milling Systems for De-Germed Products,” Bulletin-Association of Operative Millers, pp. 2168-2179. Jun. 1955. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report and Opinion, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170028404 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62198442 | Jul 2015 | US |