Degradable no-go component

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8622141
  • Patent Number
    8,622,141
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 16, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 7, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A system for setting and retrieving a tool including a tubular having a first profile and a tool having a second profile, the first and second profiles complementarily formed and engagable together for enabling the tool to be located in a borehole with respect to the tubular, the first profile or the second profile at least partially formed from a degradable material, the degradable material degradable upon exposure to a downhole fluid.
Description
BACKGROUND

Tools in the downhole drilling and completions industry are often located in a borehole by the use of no-go profiles (or landing nipples, radially inner restrictions, etc.). While these no-go profiles are relied upon for providing positive indication that a tool is properly set, too much load on the tool can deform or swage the tool and/or the no-go profile. If a tool becomes swaged into a no-go profile, retrieval of the tool can become difficult and the tool and profile can become damaged. As a result, advances to the setting and subsequent retrieval of tools, particularly those overcoming the above problems, are well received by the industry.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION

A system for setting and retrieving a tool including a tubular having a first profile and a tool having a second profile, the first and second profiles complementarily formed and engagable together for enabling the tool to be located in a borehole with respect to the tubular, the first profile or the second profile at least partially formed from a degradable material, the degradable material degradable upon exposure to a downhole fluid.


A system for setting and retrieving a tool including an engagement including a first profile of a first component and a second profile of a second component, the engagement operatively arranged for locating the first component in a borehole with respect to the second component, the first profile at least partially degradable by exposure to a downhole fluid.


A component of a no-go engagement including a first profile operatively arranged to engage with a second profile of the no-go engagement for locating a tool downhole, the first profile at least partially degradable upon exposure to a downhole fluid.


A method of setting and retrieving a tool downhole including landing a first profile of a tool at a second profile of a tubular, exposing the first profile or the second profile to a downhole fluid for degrading the first profile or the second profile at least partially.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:



FIG. 1 is a quarter-sectional view of a system having a no-go engagement between a tubular and a tool;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of the area generally encircled in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a quarter-sectional view of the system of FIG. 1 having dogs of the tool set into recesses of the tubular;



FIG. 4A is a cross-sectional view of the system taken generally along line 4A-4A in FIG. 1;



FIG. 4B is a cross-sectional view of the system taken generally along line 4B-4B in FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a quarter-sectional view of the system of FIG. 1 after application of an additional load on the tool;



FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of area generally encircled in FIG. 5; and



FIG. 7 is a quarter-sectional view of the system of FIG. 1 after a ring of the no-go engagement has been removed by degradation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a system 10 is shown having a tool 12 being run in a tubular 14. As shown in more detail in FIG. 2, the system 10 includes a no-go engagement 16 comprising a landing profile 18 on the tubular 14 and a no-go ring 20 on the tool 12 having a corresponding profile 22. Once received at the landing profile 18, positive interference or radial overlap with the profile 22 of the ring 20 prevents the tool 12 from traveling further downhole. The tool 12 is illustrated throughout the Figures in the form of a lock mandrel, but it will be appreciated that other tools or downhole components (the term “tool” used collectively herein) could utilize the no-go engagement of the current invention. That is, for example, tools benefiting from the current invention include those that carry a load in excess of the setting load such as plugs, tubing hangers, check valves, etc.


Accordingly, after landing at the profile 18, a setting load is applied to the tool 12, specifically on a sub 24 for the tool 12. The sub 24 includes a mandrel 26 for engaging with one or more dogs 28 and expanding the dogs 28 radially outwardly into complementarily formed recesses 30 in the tubular 14, as shown in FIG. 3. This creates positive interference or a radial overlap between the dogs 28 and the tubular 14, which can be appreciated by comparing FIGS. 4A and 4B.


Under high pressure or an additional force or load after being set (e.g., the tool including or being formed as a plug housing, check valve retainer, tubing hanger, etc., as noted above), the tool 12 is shifted downhole such that the dogs 28 result in an engagement at a surface 32 of the recesses 30, as shown in FIG. 4. Once the dogs 28 are fully engaged against the walls of the recesses 30, the tubular 14, via the dogs 28, picks up the weight of the tool 12 and any components hanging therefrom or pressures applied thereto.


Shifting the dogs 28 downhole to engage at the surface 32, however, causes the ring 20 of the tool 12 to also shift downhole, becoming swaged into the landing profile 18 of the tubular 14. As shown in more detail in FIG. 5, the ring 20 is deformed a distance D into the landing profile 18 of the tubular 12. This swaging makes retrieval of the tool 12 difficult as it significantly increases the force required to pull the ring 20, and therefore the tool 12, free of the tubular 14.


In order to facilitate the retrieval of the tool 12 in the system 10, the no-go engagement 16 is at least partially degradable. “Degradable” is intended to mean that the ring is disintegratable, dissolvable, corrodible, consumable, or otherwise removable. It is to be understood that use herein of the term “degrade”, or any of its forms, incorporates the stated meaning. The ring 20 is formed as any known degradable material, such as a metal, polymer, composite, etc. that is removed or weakened by exposure to a downhole fluid, for example, water, oil, acid, brine, etc. In FIG. 6 the ring 20 has been removed by exposure to one of the downhole fluids, for example, by spotting acid to the ring 20. In another example, the material of the ring 20 could be selected such that is degrades more slowly over time, and is sufficiently weakened or removed by the time any additional load is applied to the tool 12. Once the ring 20 is removed, there is no longer a swaged engagement of the tool 12 with the tubular 14, thereby facilitating removal of the tool 12. It is also to be appreciated that degrading of the ring 20 could occur before application of the additional pressure or force on the tool 12, such that swaging never occurs, in which case the dogs 28 would engage with the surface 32 before the application of any additional pressures, loads, or forces (e.g., for or with operation of a plug, check valve, tubing hanger, etc.).


Although the system 10 is shown with the tool 12 disposed radially inwardly of the tubular 14, in another embodiment a tool could be located radially outwardly of a tubular, with a degradable ring disposed radially inwardly of the tool. In another embodiment, the degradable ring could be formed as part of the tubular with the tool including a non-degradable landing profile. The ring 20 could be a c-ring, a full ring held by a retainer, a full ring that is press fit onto or into the tool or tubular, etc. Furthermore, although the term “ring” is used consistently herein, it is to be appreciated that other members or portions of a non-go engagement could be used for decreasing the amount of undesirable swaging between two components in order to facilitate retrieval of one or both of the components.


While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.

Claims
  • 1. A system for setting and retrieving a tool comprising: a tubular having a radially extending first profile; anda tool configured to be landed on the tubular, the tool having a second profile configured to be received at the first profile to land the tool on the tubular, the first and second profiles complementarily formed and engagable together for enabling the tool to be located in a borehole with respect to the tubular, the second profile at least partially formed from a degradable material, the degradable material degradable upon exposure to a downhole fluid.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the tool includes a ring, the ring including the second profile and at least partially formed from the degradable material.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the second profile is configured to engage the first profile in response to axially shifting the tool to maintain the tool at a location relative to the tubular, and release the tool from the first profile upon degradation of the degradable material.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the tool includes at least one dog operatively arranged to engage with at least one corresponding recess in the tubular after the tool has been located.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein a mandrel engages the at least one dog and urges the at least one dog into the at least one corresponding recess in response to a setting force.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the tool is subjected to a force exceeding the setting force after engagement of the at least one dog with the at least one corresponding recess.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the force swages the first profile with the second profile.
  • 8. The system of claim 5, wherein the tool is arranged for a plug, check valve, or tubing hanger.
  • 9. The system of claim 5, wherein the recess is operatively arranged to enable the tubular to pick up a weight of the tool via the at least one dog.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the tool comprises a lock mandrel.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the degradable material comprises a metal, polymer, composite, or combinations including at least one of the foregoing.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the downhole fluid is acid, water, brine, oil, or combinations including at least one of the foregoing.
  • 13. A system for setting and retrieving a tool comprising: an engagement including a first profile of a first component and a second radially extending profile of a tubular second component, the engagement operatively arranged for locating the first component in a borehole with respect to the second component by landing the first profile on the second profile, the first profile at least partially degradable by exposure to a downhole fluid.
  • 14. A component of a no-go engagement comprising: a first profile of a tool operatively arranged to engage with a second profile of the no-go engagement for locating the tool downhole, the second profile having a radially extending portion configured to engage the tool by landing the first profile on the second profile, the first profile at least partially degradable upon exposure to a downhole fluid.
  • 15. The component of claim 14, wherein the tool comprises the component.
  • 16. A method of setting and retrieving a tool downhole comprising: landing a first profile of a tool at a second radially extending profile of a tubular by axially moving the tool relative to the tubular;exposing the first profile to a downhole fluid for degrading the first profile or the second profile at least partially.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising setting the tool by applying a first force thereto.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein setting the tool comprises radially moving at least one dog of the tool into at least one corresponding recess in the tubular.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising loading the tool with a second force for engaging the at least one dog with a surface of the at least one corresponding recess.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein loading of the tool occurs before exposing the first profile or the second profile and the second force swages the first and second profiles together.
US Referenced Citations (54)
Number Name Date Kind
3211232 Grimmer Oct 1965 A
4537255 Regalbuto et al. Aug 1985 A
4949788 Szarka et al. Aug 1990 A
4991654 Brandell et al. Feb 1991 A
5333689 Jones et al. Aug 1994 A
5479986 Gano et al. Jan 1996 A
5501276 Weaver et al. Mar 1996 A
5558153 Holcombe et al. Sep 1996 A
5607017 Owens et al. Mar 1997 A
5623993 Van Buskirk et al. Apr 1997 A
5685372 Gano Nov 1997 A
5709269 Head Jan 1998 A
5765641 Shy et al. Jun 1998 A
6026903 Shy et al. Feb 2000 A
6062310 Wesson et al. May 2000 A
6076600 Vick, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6161622 Robb et al. Dec 2000 A
6220350 Brothers et al. Apr 2001 B1
6289991 French Sep 2001 B1
6397950 Streich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6431276 Robb et al. Aug 2002 B1
6926086 Patterson et al. Aug 2005 B2
7093664 Todd et al. Aug 2006 B2
7325617 Murray Feb 2008 B2
7350582 McKeachnie et al. Apr 2008 B2
7353879 Todd et al. Apr 2008 B2
7395856 Murray Jul 2008 B2
7464764 Xu Dec 2008 B2
7625846 Cooke, Jr. Dec 2009 B2
7628210 Avant et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644772 Avant et al. Jan 2010 B2
7726406 Xu Jun 2010 B2
7775286 Duphorne Aug 2010 B2
7798236 McKeachnie et al. Sep 2010 B2
7909108 Swor et al. Mar 2011 B2
8079413 Frazier Dec 2011 B2
20030141064 Roberson, Jr. Jul 2003 A1
20030168214 Sollesnes Sep 2003 A1
20050092363 Richard et al. May 2005 A1
20050161224 Starr et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050205264 Starr et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205265 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205266 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050281968 Shanholtz et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060021748 Swor et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060131031 McKeachnie et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060266518 Woloson Nov 2006 A1
20070074873 McKeachnie et al. Apr 2007 A1
20080066923 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20080066924 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20090044948 Avant et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090107684 Cooke, Jr. Apr 2009 A1
20100032151 Duphorne Feb 2010 A1
20100155050 Frazier Jun 2010 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
BXN Seating Nipples; Bricco Oil Tools, A Division of Brico Holding Inc.; www.brocoolltools.com; Product No. 36-14—p. 4 of 4—Revised Jun. 10, 2009.
D.W. Thomson, et al., Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation, SPE Drilling & Completion, Sep. 1998, pp. 151-156, Offshore Technology Conference, U.S.A.
H.A. Nasr-El-Din, et al., Laboratory Evaluation Biosealers, Feb. 13, 2001, pp. 1-11, SPE 65017, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., U.S.A.
X. Li, et al., An Integrated Transport Model for BallSealer Diversion in Vertical and Horizontal Wells, Oct. 9, 2005, pp. 1-9, SPE 96339, Society of Petroleum Engineers, U.S.A.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130043047 A1 Feb 2013 US