The disclosure relates to the field of hydrocarbon well perforation. More specifically, devices for anchoring and delaying the release of a perforating gun are disclosed.
When a hydrocarbon well is drilled, a casing may be placed in the well to line and seal the wellbore. Cement is then pumped down the well under pressure and forced up the outside of the casing until the well column is also sealed. This casing process ensures that the well is isolated, and prevents uncontrolled migration of subsurface fluids between different well zones, and provides a conduit for installing production tubing in the well. However, to connect the inside of the casing and wellbore with the inside of the formation to allow for hydrocarbon flow from the formation to the inside of the casing, holes are formed throughout the casing and into the wellbore. This practice is commonly referred to as perforating of the casing and formation. Open-hole wells are also possible, i.e., where a casing is not used and jetting, fracturing or perforation is directly applied to the formation.
During the perforating process, a gun-assembled body containing a plurality of shaped charges is lowered into the wellbore and positioned opposite the subsurface formation to be perforated. Electrical signals are then passed from a surface location through a wireline to one or more blasting caps located in the gun body, thereby causing detonation of the blasting caps. The exploding blasting caps in turn transfer a detonating wave to a detonator cord which further causes the shaped charges to detonate. The detonated shaped charges form an energetic stream of high-pressure gases and high velocity particles, which perforates the well casing and the adjacent formation to form perforation tunnels. The hydrocarbons and/or other fluids trapped in the formation flow into the tunnels, into the casing through the orifices cut in the casing, and up the casing to the surface for recovery.
It may then be desirable to drop the perforating gun assembly after operation so that retrieval of the support equipment can be accomplished without sticking the portion of the equipment, which swells after operation.
The explosive nature of the formation of perforation tunnels shatters sand grains of the formation. A layer of “shock damaged region” having a permeability lower than that of the original formation matrix may be formed around each perforation tunnel. The process may also generate a tunnel full of rock debris mixed in with the perforator charge debris. The extent of the damage, and the amount of loose debris in the tunnel, may be dictated by a variety of factors including formation properties, explosive charge properties, pressure conditions, fluid properties, and so forth. The shock damaged region and loose debris in the perforation tunnels may impair the productivity of production wells or the injectivity of injector wells.
A common means of cleaning the perforation tunnels is to underbalance the perforation by using a lower wellbore pressure during perforation. This way, the surge flow of fluid into the wellbore during perforation should clean the perforation tunnel of some of the disaggregated rock and liner debris. However, underbalance perforating may not always be effective, and may be expensive and unsafe to implement in certain downhole conditions.
Acidizing is another widely used method for removing perforation damage. However, it is not effective for treating sand and loose debris left inside the perforation tunnel.
Thus, what is needed in the art are methods and devices to improve the cleanliness of the perforations to facilitate fluid flow. Although wellbore perforations are quite successful, even incremental improvements in technology to improve fluid communication can mean the difference between cost effective production and reservoirs that are uneconomical to produce.
The present methods includes any of the following embodiments in any combination(s) of one or more thereof:
An embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method of perforating a wellbore, the method comprising the steps of: (a) lowering a perforating wellbore tool into the wellbore proximate a formation to be perforated, (b) anchoring the perforating wellbore tool by setting an anchoring tool, (c) perforating the formation, (d) creating a low pressure chamber in the perforating wellbore tool, and (e) unsetting the anchoring tool after a time delay.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure provides a wellbore tool. In this embodiment, the wellbore tool comprises a gun anchor system with one or more explosive type anchor releases. The wellbore tool further comprises a perforating gun having one or more shaped charges for forming perforation tunnels in a formation, one or more ports, and a surge chamber, wherein the one or more ports can be actuated to allow surge flow from the perforation tunnels into the surge chamber. The wellbore tool further comprises an explosive train, wherein said explosive train is connected to both a detonating cord in said perforating gun, and a ballistic time delay system connected to the explosive type anchor releases.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of perforating a wellbore. The method comprises the step of lowering a perforating wellbore tool into the wellbore proximate a formation to be perforated, wherein said perforating wellbore tool comprises a gun anchor with one or more explosive type anchor releases, a perforating gun having a plurality of shaped charges initiated by ignition of a detonating cord, an interior chamber, and one or more communication ports that when opened are in communication with the interior chamber, a ballistic time delay system initiated by ignition of a fuse to release the one or more explosive type anchor releases, and an explosive train split into two paths, a first path for igniting the detonating cord of the perforating gun, and a second path for igniting the fuse of the ballistic time delay system. The method further comprises the steps of anchoring said perforating wellbore tool, activating the explosive train to ignite the plurality of shaped charges to perforate the formation and ignite the fuse of the ballistic time delay, and opening the one or more communication ports to create a low pressure in the interior chamber.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. However, many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limited the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It is emphasized that, in accordance with standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some embodiments of the present disclosure. It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments are possible. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but rather made merely for the purpose of describing general principles of the implementations. The scope of the described implementations should be ascertained with reference to the issued claims.
As used herein, the terms “connect”, “connection”, “connected”, “in connection with”, and “connecting” are used to mean “in direct connection with” or “in connection with via one or more elements”; and the term “set” is used to mean “one element” or “more than one element”. Further, the terms “couple”, “coupling”, “coupled”, “coupled together”, and “coupled with” are used to mean “directly coupled together” or “coupled together via one or more elements”. As used herein, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “top” and “bottom”; and other like terms indicating relative positions to a given point or element are utilized to more clearly describe some elements. Commonly, these terms relate to a reference point at the surface from which drilling operations are initiated as being the top point and the total depth being the lowest point, wherein the well (e.g., wellbore, borehole) is vertical, horizontal or slanted relative to the surface.
Generally, the present disclosure provides a wellbore perforation tool that has a delayed drop post-perforation. The wellbore perforation tool of the present disclosure controls the downhole transient underbalance pressure during and after perforation while anchoring a tool string, delaying the release of the anchoring device, and dropping a perforating gun string to the bottom of the well after perforation. This allows for the creation of clean perforations in the reservoir, which reduces time and costs associated with perforation cleanup.
If large volumes of cement filtrate invade the rock during perforation, the possibility of formation damage 104 exists. Further, the perforation process may also generate a tunnel full of rock debris mixed in with the perforator charge debris. Such outcomes reduce the productivity and injectivity of the perforation and well 10.
Applicant previously developed a technology to create cleaner perforations for better performing wells. This technology, described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,598,682, which is incorporated herein in its entirety for all purposes, modifies a conventional perforating gun to control the underbalance effect experienced during perforations.
It should be understood that in alternate embodiments of the present disclosure, depending on the application for creating the underbalance condition, the underbalance perforating charges 122 may be installed in either a gun alongside conventional charged 121 or in a perforating gun 120 alongside underbalance perforating charges only.
An embodiment of a modified perforating gun 120 that can be used in embodiments of the present disclosure is depicted in
In the embodiment shown, the underbalanced perforating charges 122 create an opening 123 in the second (surge) chamber 132 of the perforating gun 120, but not the casing 102 or formation 100. Unlike conventional perforating systems that rely on a large static pressure differential between the wellbore and the formation 100 to remove perforation debris and crushed-zone damage, the underbalanced perforating system fully exploits the transient underbalance that occurs immediately after perforating. This creates a large dynamic underbalance that results in flow into (shown by the arrows in
In the embodiment of the perforating gun 120 shown in
Underbalanced perforating technology is not easily combinable with automatic release anchoring technology. Typically, when using anchoring tools with automatic release, the perforating guns are automatically released and dropped to the bottom of the well at the instant of the detonation. This timing does not allow for the underbalance effect to be fully captured. As such, the perforation tunnels may not be fully cleaned, resulting in decreased production performance.
To overcome this pressure issue and inability to create the full underbalance effect, the delayed drop assembly of the present disclosure combines an anchoring device having an explosive type release mechanism with a ballistic delay fuse. Traditionally, ballistic delay fuses have been used to delay the detonation for individual perforating guns. In embodiments of the present disclosure, however, ballistic delay fuses are being used to delay the release and drop of perforating guns. This allows for the surge chamber to fill with fluid and create the dynamic underbalance needed to clean the perforations before it drops to the bottom of the well.
As noted above, and as illustrated in
An overview of an embodiment of the delayed drop assembly 400 of the present disclosure is shown in
The ballistic time delay system 403, however, has a ballistic time delay fuse (BTDF) that will delay the release of the anchor slips 201 on the anchoring tool 401. This, in turn, delays the dropping of the perforating gun post-perforation such that there is sufficient time for the underbalance effect to be obtained and for fluids and debris to flow in the communication ports 123 of the surge chamber 132. The BTDF explosive path will then continue to a break plug 203 and follow typical anchoring tool release mechanisms to release the slips 201 anchoring the tool 401. This will cause the anchoring tool 401 and perforating guns below to fall to the bottom of the well. Because of the delayed drop, the perforations in the wellbore will be cleaned by the dynamic underbalance pressure created by the opening of the communication ports 123 of the surge chamber 132.
Embodiments of the present disclosure combine anchoring technology, underbalance perforation technology, and ballistic delay systems in to a single tool to clean perforations as they are made. The delay drop assembly tool reduces the cost and time needed for perforating services while improving the wellbore's productivity and injectivity by removing debris to minimize or eliminate crushed zone damage.
In embodiments of the present disclosure, minimal or no initial static underbalance is required. Fluctuations in the wellbore pressure immediately after shaped charge detonation actually governs the perforation cleanup. The underbalance technology utilizes this understanding of dynamic wellbore pressure to control surge flow. Further, embodiments of the present disclosure enhance acidizing and hydraulic fracturing treatments. Near wellbore washes with acid may be eliminated in most perforation operations. Additionally, remedial perforation was acid jobs may be eliminated.
Embodiments of the present disclosure improve isolation resulting from minimal cement sandface hydraulic bond disruption. Additionally, embodiments of the present disclosure reduce rig time and equipment costs associated with perforation washes, acid stimulation, pumping nitrogen and reservoir cleanup.
Although a few embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. For instance, it should be understood that the perforating shaped charges and the underbalance charges may be located alongside each other, with the surge chamber resulting along the interior of the perforating gun. Further, it should be understood that the present disclosure in not limited to a single perforating gun. In alternate embodiments, multiple perforating guns may be deployed and detonated in succession through use of the same explosive train.
Such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims. The scope of the invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. The terms “a,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words “means for” together with an associated function.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2029478 | Haines | Feb 1936 | A |
2139104 | Wells | Dec 1938 | A |
2446640 | Davis | Aug 1948 | A |
3118501 | Kenley | Jan 1964 | A |
3163112 | Rhea | Dec 1964 | A |
3311178 | Mcelheny | Mar 1967 | A |
3589442 | Kilgore | Jun 1971 | A |
3630282 | Lanmon | Dec 1971 | A |
3709294 | Kilgore | Jan 1973 | A |
3760878 | Peevey | Sep 1973 | A |
4122899 | Brieger | Oct 1978 | A |
4161985 | Fournier et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4175042 | Mondshine | Nov 1979 | A |
4372384 | Kinney | Feb 1983 | A |
4484632 | Vann | Nov 1984 | A |
4501331 | Brieger | Feb 1985 | A |
4515217 | Stout | May 1985 | A |
4526233 | Stout | Jul 1985 | A |
4557331 | Stout | Dec 1985 | A |
4564076 | Vann et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4576233 | George | Mar 1986 | A |
4605074 | Barfield | Aug 1986 | A |
4616701 | Stout et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4619325 | Zunkel | Oct 1986 | A |
4619333 | George | Oct 1986 | A |
4621692 | Mondshine | Nov 1986 | A |
4629001 | Miller et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4650010 | George et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4800958 | Haugen et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4804044 | Wesson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4805726 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4862964 | George et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865131 | Moore et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903775 | Manke | Feb 1990 | A |
5044388 | Barton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5088557 | Ricles et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103912 | Flint | Apr 1992 | A |
5117911 | Navarette et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5131472 | Dees et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135051 | Facteau et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5188191 | Tomek | Feb 1993 | A |
5228508 | Facteau et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5287741 | Schultz | Feb 1994 | A |
5301755 | George et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318126 | Edwards et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5355802 | Petitjean | Oct 1994 | A |
5366013 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5445078 | Marion | Aug 1995 | A |
5551344 | Couet et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5609178 | Hennig et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5635636 | Alexander | Jun 1997 | A |
5680905 | Green et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5836393 | Johnson | Nov 1998 | A |
5837925 | Nice | Nov 1998 | A |
5845712 | Griffith, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5865254 | Huber et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6102126 | Huber et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6152232 | Webb et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173783 | Abbott-Brown et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206100 | George et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220355 | French | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6302209 | Thompson, Sr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315043 | Farrant | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336408 | Parrott et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336506 | Wesson | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343658 | Webb | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6347673 | Dailey | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394184 | Tolman et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6412614 | Lagrange et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6481494 | Dusterhoft et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494260 | van Petegem et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497284 | van Petegem et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6527050 | Sask | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6588508 | Parrott et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598682 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604818 | Leibman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6732798 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6865792 | Kash | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7121340 | Grove et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182138 | Behrmann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
9194219 | Hardesty | Nov 2015 | B1 |
20020020535 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020053434 | Chen | May 2002 | A1 |
20020153142 | Eslinger et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030062160 | Boney et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089498 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040168805 | Fripp et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050167108 | Chang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20120018157 | Gill | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120298361 | Sampson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20160319646 | Escudero | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180216446 | Allison | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0155128 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0415770 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0488875 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1041244 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1223303 | Jul 2002 | EP |
677824 | Aug 1952 | GB |
686530 | Jan 1953 | GB |
2065750 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2242009 | Sep 1991 | GB |
1771508 | Oct 1992 | RU |
1831561 | Jul 1993 | RU |
1736223 | Nov 1995 | RU |
2054525 | Feb 1996 | RU |
1570384 | May 1996 | RU |
2075593 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2084616 | Jul 1997 | RU |
2085719 | Jul 1997 | RU |
2120028 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2123577 | Dec 1998 | RU |
2146759 | Mar 2000 | RU |
2162934 | Feb 2001 | RU |
2168621 | Jun 2001 | RU |
2171367 | Jul 2001 | RU |
2179235 | Feb 2002 | RU |
2179629 | Feb 2002 | RU |
2180938 | Mar 2002 | RU |
2183259 | Jun 2002 | RU |
926252 | May 1982 | SU |
9733069 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9942696 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0107860 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0125595 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0165060 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Reeves, et al, An Exploration 3D Seismic Field Test Program in Osage County, Oklahoma, Jan. 1999, National Petroleum Technology Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Tulsa, Oklahoma, SPE 2648 (86 pages). |
G. E. King, et al, A Field Study of Underbalance Pressures Necessary to Obtain Clean Perforations Using Tubing Conveyed Perforating, SPE 14321, Jun. 1986, Journal of Petroleum Technology (3 pages). |
Regalbuto, John A., et al, Underbalanced Perforation Characteristics as Affected by Differential Pressure, SPE 15816, Feb. 1988, SPE Production Engineering (6 pages). |
Halleck, P.M., et al, Effects of Underbalance on Perforation Flow, May 1989, SPE 16895, SPE Production Engineering (4 pages). |
Crawford, H.R., Underbalanced Perforating Design, 1969, SPE 19749, Society of Petroleum Engineers (14 pages). |
L.A. Behrmann et al., Measurement of Additional Skin Resulting From Perforation Damage, SPE 22809, Oct. 1991, Society of Petroleum Engineers (12 pages). |
Pucknell et al., An Investigation of the Damaged Zone Created by Perforating, SPE 22811, Oct. 1991, Society of Petroleum Engineers (12 pages). |
Behrmann et al., Effects of Underbalance and Effective Stress on Perforation Damage in Weak Sandstone: Initial Results; SPE 24770, Oct. 1992, Society of Petroleum Engineers (10 pages). |
Scott et al., Air Foam Improves Efficiency of Completion and Workover Operations in Low-Pressure Gas Wells; SPE 27922, Dec. 1995, Society of Petroleum Engineers (7 pages). |
L.A. Behrmann, Underbalance Criteria for Minimum Perforation Damage; SPE30081, Sep. 1996, Society of Petroleum Engineers (5 pages). |
Hovem et al., An Investigation of Critical Parameters for Optimum Perforation Clean-Up; SPE 30084, May 1995, Society of Petroleum Engineers (10 pages). |
L.A. Behmann et al., Underbalance or Extreme Overbalance; SPE 31083, Feb. 1996, Society of Petroleum Engineers (18 pages). |
Behrmann et al., Borehole Dynamics During Underbalanced Perforating; Jun. 1997, SPE 38139, Society of Petroleum Engineers (8 pages). |
Smith et al., Improvements in Perforating Performance in High Compressive Strength Rocks; SPE 38141, Jun. 1997, Society of Petroleum Engineers (6 pages). |
Swift et al., Micro-Mechanical Modeling of Perforating Shock Damage; SPE 39458, Feb. 1998, Society of Petroleum Engineers (11 pages). |
Berhmann et al; “Underbalance or Extreme Overbalance”; SPE Production & Facilities, vol. 14, No. 3, Aug. 1999, pp. 187-196. |
Underdown et al., Optimizing Perforating Strategy in Well Completions to Maximize Productivity; SPE 58772, Feb. 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers (7 pages). |
Venkitaraman et al., Perforating Requirements for Sand Prevention; SPE 58788, Feb. 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers (5 pages). |
Behrmann et al., Perforating Requirements for Fracture Stimulations; SPE 59480, Dec. 1999, Society of Petroleum Engineers (7 pages). |
Walton et al., Laboratory Experiments Provide New Insights into Underbalanced Perforating; Oct. 2001, SPE 71642, Society of Petroleum Engineers (8 pages). |
Behrmann et al., New Underbalanced Perforating Technique Increases Completion Efficiency and Eliminates Costly Acid Stimulation; SPE 77364, Oct. 2002, Society of Petroleum Engineers (15 pages). |
Fridlander, L. Ya., Shooting-Explosion Equipment and Application Thereof in Wellbores, 1985, pp. 32-36 and 119-126, Nedra (Mineral Resources) Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. |
Grigoryan, N.G., Development of Oil and Gas Formations by Means of Shooting Perforators, 1982, pp. 22-44 and 222-232, Nedra (Mineral Resources) Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. |
Folse, K., Allin, M., Chow, C., and Hardesty, 1.; “Perforating System Selection for Optimum Well Inflow Performance”; SPE 73762 paper presented at the Internal Symposium of Formation Damage; Lafayette, LA; Feb. 20-21, 2002. |
Morten Stenhaug, Leif Erichsen, Statoil; Fokko H.C. Doornbosch, Robert A. Parrott, Schlumberger: ““A Step Change in Perforating Technology Improves Productivity of Horizontal Wells in the North Sea,”” SPE 84910, Oct. 20-21, pp. 1-11. |
Overview of Implo Treat Pamphlet, Implo Treat Systems, Jan. 17, 2000 (4 pages). |
Sooleimanov, A.B., et al, Know-How and Equipment for Thorough Repair of Wellbores, 1987, pp. 288-297, Nedra (Mineral Resources) Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. (no Translation Availble). |
Gorodissky & Partners, Transmittal Letter with Official Action received from the Patent Office of the Russian Federation, dated Mar. 14, 2006, 10 pages, Moscow, Russia. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200040704 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |