The present invention relates to manipulating an optical signal, in particular to manipulating an optical signal in an optical interferometer, more particular to manipulating an optical signal in a swept wavelength interferometer having a measurement arm for a device under test (DUT) and a reference arm.
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide improved manipulation of an optical signal. The object is solved by the independent claims.
An advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that the following problem of prior art interferometers can be avoided: A DUT in the measurement arm of an interferometer has a certain group delay. The reference arm has a certain group delay, also. However, the group delay of the DUT is normally bigger than that of the reference arm. Therefore, when sweeping the frequency of a tunable laser source (TLS), which is feeding the interferometer with a laser beam, a signal with a certain frequency having traveled through the measurement arm is arriving later at the detector than the signal of the reference arm with that frequency. Consequently, the signal of the DUT interferes with a reference signal having a different frequency not being the reference frequency belonging to the detected DUT signal.
In an embodiment of the present invention, by introducing a delay line, preferably by introducing a loop, in the reference arm of the interferometer it is possible to achieve two targets at the same time: First, it is created a wavelength reference unit (WRU) for the TLS and, second, it is generated a periodic delay line in the reference arm that allows to match the delay of the reference arm to a delay in the measurement arm caused by the DUT. The first is possible because the beat signal frequency of the interference signal between the delayed part and the non-delayed part of the signal is determined by the frequency sweep rate of the TLS. Therefore, the beat signal frequency is a direct measure of the tuning speed of the TLS. The present application seeks independent protection for this aspect, also.
Furthermore, when combining the signals of the DUT arm and of the reference arm the beat signal frequency of the interference signal is determined by the frequency sweep rate of the TLS and by the group delay difference between the DUT and the reference arm. This means that at the end of the interferometer a detector can detect two beat frequencies, which however can be separately processed to evaluate a wavelength reference and a measurement result. Advantageously, only one detector for both beat frequencies is necessary.
Especially when analyzing DUTs with big group delays the afore mentioned situation becomes a serious problem since the beat signal frequency might become larger than the interferometer detection bandwidth.
Due to the delay line or loop integrated in the reference arm of the inventive interferometer there is introduced a delay in at least a part of the reference signal. Then at least a part of the delayed part is delayed again and so on. This provides for every possible delay of the DUT a suiting delayed signal in the reference signal. This means, also for a certain limited bandwidth of a photo diode used as a part of a detector measuring the interference signal it will nearly always be possible to detect a beat frequency. Therefore, no variable time delay compensation is necessary.
Possible application fields of embodiments of the present invention are measurement setups for loss and phase characterization of long devices or DUTs having large group delay.
Another advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that the delay line or integrated WRU also can be used to compensate for nonlinearities in the sweeping velocity of the TLS. The present application seeks independent protection for this aspect, also.
Additionally, embodiments of the present invention can reduce the impact of the laser phase noise on the measurement.
Moreover, embodiments of the present invention can reduce laser phase noise induced de-correlation of the signals in an interferometer.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the delay line comprises at least one beam splitter or coupler connected to a loop providing the delay. The percentage of the beam coupled out by the coupler can be determined individually, i.e. any percentage can be used for the present invention, e.g. 95:5, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 50:50, 30:70, 20:80, 10:90, 5:95 etc.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention the delay line, preferably comprising a loop, is connected by two beam splitters or couplers with the line providing the signal, one coupler for coupling in the signal and one coupler for coupling out the signal. This allows optimizing independently the amount of power that is coupled into the delay line and out of the delay line.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention the inventive delay line is used to provide comb like frequency lines in a certain frequency range.
A further advantage of embodiments of the present invention is a reduced setup group delay impact on measurement results.
Other preferred embodiments are shown by the dependent claims.
It is clear that the invention can be partly embodied or supported by one or more suitable software programs, which can be stored on or otherwise provided by any kind of data carrier, and which might be executed in or by any suitable data processing unit.
Other objects and many of the attendant advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated and become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considering in connection with the accompanied drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. Features that are substantially or functionally equal or similar will be referred to with the same reference sign(s).
Referring now in greater detail to the drawings,
The fiber coupler 4 provides 50% of the incoming power at port 3 to outgoing port 5 and 50% to another outgoing port 7 as indicated by arrows in the box of fiber coupler 4 in
The inventive method works as follows: When continuously tuning the TLS 1 it is generated a light wave with increasing optical frequency in fiber 2. 50% of this signal is coupled into delay line 9 and 50% travels undelayed into fibers 6. Since the delayed signal is coupled into fiber 6 by coupler 4, also, detector 8 detects two signals having different optical frequencies f1 and f2. The frequency difference between f1 and f2 is determined by the product of the tuning rate γ of the TLS 1 and the signal delay. These signals interfere at detector 8 and generate a beat signal of frequency f1-f2, thus the frequency of which is a direct measure of the tuning rate of the TLS 1. Since part of the delayed signal is again coupled into the delay line 9 the delay can be written as follows: n*Äτ, n being the number of circulations of the signal in the delay line 9.
Additionally to coupler 4 another coupler 30 is coupled into the reference arm 20 after the coupler 4. Coupler 30 has an incoming port 32 and two outgoing ports 34 and 36. Outgoing port 34 is connected to the recombining beam splitter at 26 whereas outgoing port 36 is connected to a second detector 8-2 which is connected to a second mixer 10-2 that is connected to a WRU processing unit 12-2. Detector 8-2 detects beat. Second detector 8-2 detects the WRU information whereas detector 8 detects both WRU and DUT information. With the help of detector 8-2 it is possible to evaluate the WRU information unambiguously.
Due to the delay line 9 the interferometer beat frequencies are nearly independent of a length of the DUT 24. E.g. without the delay line 9 and if the sweeping velocity would be approximately 40 nm/s and the length of the DUT 24 would be up to 100 m the beat frequency of the interferometer would oscillate between 0 and approximately 2.5 MHz. However, if a delay line 9 is introduced with a length of approximately 10 m the beat frequency of the interferometer would oscillate between 0 and approximately 0.250 MHz, only.
Detector 8 and detector 8-2 both detect beat signals N*Äτ*γ as auto beat signals with frequencies as illustrated in schematic graph 38 and detector 8 detects signals (τ1−τ2−N*Äτ)*γ with frequencies as illustrated in schematic graph 28 as a measurement beat signal. Within the detector bandwidth of detector 8 as indicated by the solid line in schematic graph 28 it is possible to select one or two auto beat signals as indicated by arrows in the schematic graph 28 by means of the processing units 12 and 12-2.
Detector 8 detects beat signals N*Äτ*γ as an auto beat signal and detects (τ1−τ2−N*Äτ)*γ as a measurement beat signal. Within the detector bandwidth of detector 8 as indicated by the solid line in schematic graph 28 it is possible to select one or two auto beat signals as indicated by arrows in the schematic graph 28 by means of the processing units 12-3a and 12-3b.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/07726 | 7/11/2002 | WO | 3/24/2006 |