1. Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to delivering electronic content.
2. Related Art
The Internet offers a tremendous amount of information on a wide range of subjects. Many businesses and organizations offer world-wide-web sites that promote products, offer technical assistance, and provide other useful information. Search engines (e.g., Yahoo™) typically can provide lengthy lists of sites related to any topic of interest. Users typically do not want to take the time to investigate more than a handful of these sites. As a result, the vast number of web-sites makes it difficult for web-site providers to lure Internet users to their respective sites.
Since the inception of the web, web-pages have featured links to other sites. A link can appear as underlined text (e.g., “please visit deskgate”), as a picture, or as a sequence of images. Each link has an associated URL (universal resource locator) that identifies a web-site. A link can be programmed to transport a user to a link's associated URL when a user selects the link (e.g., by clicking a mouse button).
To attract users to a site, some businesses rent space on other web-pages. For example, as shown in
In general, in one aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes providing instructions that cause a first computer to collect information including an e-mail address, and transmitting the collected information to a second computer. The second computer processes the transmitted information by selecting electronic content for transmission to the e-mail address and e-mailing the selected electronic content.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The instructions can be web-page instructions such as HTML. The instructions can be of a form. The instructions can collect the information by querying the computer or by receiving user input. The information can include demographic information and/or system information.
The processing can be done by a program such as a script (e.g., a CGI script). A URL (universal resource locator) displayed at a browser using the instructions may not be altered by the transmitting of the collected information. The processing can select electronic content based on the transmitted information. The electronic content can include text, graphics, audio, video and/or executable instructions.
The information transmitted can include identification of the instructions that transmitted the information and/or identification of a site that transmitted the information.
In general, in another aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes providing web-page form instructions that cause a first computer to interactively collect an e-mail address from a user and transmit information including the collected address information to a second computer. The method further includes processing the transmitted information at the second computer by using the transmitted information to select electronic content and e-mailing the selected electronic content to the transmitted e-mail address.
In general, in another aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes storing electronic content corresponding to different sets of instructions, receiving a request for electronic content produced by one of the sets of instructions, the request including a network address, and selecting electronic content from the stored electronic content based on the received request. The selected electronic content is transmitted to the network address included in the request.
In general, in another aspect, a computer-implemented method of providing access to electronic content includes displaying in a browser a web-page that includes a link corresponding to electronic content and in response to a user's selection of the link, collecting information without modifying the web-page displayed in the browser. The collected information is transmitted to a remote server, and electronic content from the remote server is sent to the e-mail address based on the collected information.
In general, in another aspect, a computer program, disposed on a computer readable medium, includes instructions for causing a first computer's processor to receive information collected by instructions at a second computer, and based on the received information, select electronic content and transmit the electronic, content to an e-mail address included in the received information.
Advantages may include one or more of the following. By linking an e-mail based electronic content delivery system to a web-page, businesses can enjoy the benefits of reaching “web-surfers” without the cost and/or computer resources needed to maintain a web-site. Linking in this manner also provides Internet users with the ability to get more information about a topic without leaving a web-page and without waiting for graphics and other information, to be transmitted to their browser. A business providing electronic content can not only receive demographic data describing interested users, but also can determine which web-pages are most effective in producing requests for information.
Other advantages of the invention will become apparent in view of the following description, including the figures, and the claims.
Referring to
Unlike a conventional banner-link, interaction with the form 106 does not transport the user to a different web-site. Instead, submitting entered information into the form (e.g., by typing information into the text box and then clicking the submit button 110) transmits the information entered by the user to a remote web-server without changing the current URL being displayed by the browser. The remote web-server uses the transmitted information, to select and deliver electronic content (e.g., text, graphics, audio, video, and executable instructions) via e-mail. Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,150 entitled “Tracking Electronic Content” filed Nov. 24, 1998, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,670, describes an electronic content delivery system, and is incorporated by reference.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown, the instructions 106 transmit the e-mail address 124c interactively collected from a user and an identification of the electronic content 124b to deliver to the e-mail address specified 124c. Instead of hard-coding the content to deliver 124b, the instructions 120 can transmit an I.D. that identifies electronic content to transmit. For example, different I.D.s can be assigned to different sets of instructions 120. That is, an I.D. for the golf promotion form may be “001” while the I.D. for a car promotion form may be “002”. Though the same instructions 120 can be incorporated into different web-pages, the remote server can use the I.D. to select the electronic content to transmit (e.g., information on the golf or car promotion). By using an I.D. instead of hard-coding a reference to electronic content, electronic content transmitted to a user can be easily altered.
The instructions 106 can be copied into different web-pages to reach more web users. To identify the site that produced a request for electronic content, the instructions 106 can transmit a site identification token 124a of the site transmitting the information. This information can be hard-coded (as shown) or dynamically determined by interacting with a browser's API (Application Programming Interface). By transmitting the site token 124a, the remote web-server can identify which web-pages produced the most number of requests for content.
The instructions 106 can be configured to interactively collect a wide variety of information from a user in addition to an e-mail address. Such information can include demographic information (e.g., name, address, and age) or information describing a user's interests. The electronic content transmitted by the remote server can be selected based on this information.
Additionally, the instructions 106 can dynamically access a body of information stored, for example, on the user's computer, and then transmit that information to the remote web-server. For example, the instructions can access a Windows™ registry on the user's computer to collect user and system information relating to the computer executing the instructions.
Though the instructions 106 shown produce a form, the instructions 106 that collect an e-mail message by querying a user's computer (e.g., by accessing the Windows™ registry) could instead present a simple picture or text (e.g., “Click here for e-mail information on golf”). When a user clicks on the picture or text, the instructions 106 dynamically collect the user's e-mail address and other information from the system and transmit the collected information to the remote server without requiring any data entry by the user.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The remote web-server 132 produces reports based on requests that indicate which addresses received content, which web-pages produced content requests, and demographic information describing the user's requesting information. Thus, businesses can closely track their efforts at reaching users.
The remote web-server 132 can store electronic content 138 corresponding to any number of different sets of instructions 106 (e.g., different forms). Thus, a single web-server 132 can provide electronic content delivery for a large number of different businesses or organizations. Processing requests for content typically consumes considerable computational resources on the processing computer. In addition, storing the content 138 typically requires a large volume of non-volatile storage. By letting a remote web-server dedicated to processing requests handle delivery and storage of content, the computers associated with the various enterprises will not be slowed or otherwise burdened by the processing of requests during business hours.
Referring to
Referring to
The program 134 can use the I.D. to determine which electronic content to send to a specified address (142). The program 134 can also analyze demographic data included in the received information 124 to select electronic content for delivery. After selecting the electronic content, the program 134 can e-mail the determined content (144) to the e-mail address specified in the request 124.
Referring to
The techniques described here are not limited to any particular hardware or software configuration. The techniques may be implemented in hardware or software, or a combination of the two. Preferably, the techniques are implemented in computer programs executing on programmable computers that each include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices. Program code is applied to data entered using the input device to perform the functions described and to generate output information. The output information is applied to one or more output devices.
Each program is preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.
Each such computer program is preferably stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform the procedures described in this document. The system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer to operate in a specific and predefined manner.
Other embodiments are within the score of the following claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/484,695 filed Jun. 15, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,086,746, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/889,610 filed Aug. 15, 2007, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,150, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/412,827 filed Apr. 28, 2006, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,655, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/231,714 filed Jan. 15, 1999, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,127,515, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5457746 | Dolphin | Oct 1995 | A |
5490216 | Richardson | Feb 1996 | A |
5509070 | Schull | Apr 1996 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5673316 | Auerbach et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5703951 | Dolphin | Dec 1997 | A |
5757907 | Cooper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765152 | Erickson | Jun 1998 | A |
5809145 | Silk et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5845281 | Benson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892825 | Mages et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5949875 | Walker et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956505 | Manduley | Sep 1999 | A |
6014688 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6067526 | Powell | May 2000 | A |
6073124 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098056 | Rusnak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108637 | Blumenau | Aug 2000 | A |
6135646 | Kahn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236971 | Stefik et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243468 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256664 | Donoho et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301660 | Benson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304897 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6484156 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6526456 | Allan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6807534 | Erickson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6868403 | Wiser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7010808 | Leung et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7127515 | Patterson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7206941 | Raley et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7246246 | Kupka et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272858 | Parks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7386473 | Blumenau | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395436 | Nemovicher | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7395438 | Parks et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7752466 | Ginter et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7904568 | Rudd | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020161709 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030079133 | Breiter et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040125957 | Rauber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153451 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050004978 | Reed et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021477 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060129847 | Pitsos | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179489 | Mas Ribes | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060294237 | Nguyen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090100268 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9913398 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0201330 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0201335 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/058,623, filed Sep. 11, 1997, Peterson. |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Adobe and eBooks,” pp. 1-4 (Sep. 1999). |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Adobe and Digital Content for eCommerce,” pp. 1-8 (Sep. 1999). |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Working with Adobe PDF Merchant,” pp. 1-24 (2000). |
Brad Cox, Superdistribution: Objects as Property on the Electronic Frontier (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1996). |
IBM Corp., “Chapter 1. The Cryptolope Live! Product,” IBM Cryptolope Live!, General Information Guide, Version 1, Release 1, pp. 1-36 (1997). |
The Electronic Book Exchange System (EBX), Version 0.8 (Book Industry Study Group, Inc., Jul. 2000 Draft). |
FLEXlm End User Manual, http://www.vcpc.univie.ac.at/information/software/pgi/flexuser/TOC.htm (Jun. 1996). |
Marc A. Kaplan, “IBM Cryptolopes, SuperDistribution and Digital Rights Management,” http://www.research.ibm.com/people/k/kaplan (1996). |
Ulrich Kohl et al., “Safeguarding Digital Library Contents and Users,” D-Lib Magazine, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september97/ibm/09lotspiech.html (Sep. 1997). |
Jean-Henry Morin et al., “Commercialization of Electronic Information,” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 524-529 (Jun. 7-11, 1999). |
Olin Sibert et al., “DigiBox: A Self-Protecting Container for Information Commerce,” Proceedings of the First USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce (Jul. 1995). |
TragoeS, “RightsMarket Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ),” http://web.archive.org/web/19980209124057/tragoes.com/FAQ.html (Jun. 30, 1997). |
Portland Software Introduces ZipLock ESD Commerce System for Microsoft Site Server 3.0, Commerce Edition, Press Release, http://www.fillipdesign.com/portfolio/www/portsoft/info/press/pr012698.htm (Jan. 26, 1998). |
ZipLock Server Delivers the flexibility to do ESD business your way, http://www.fillipdesign.com/portfolio/www/ziplock/system3/components/compsrvr.html (1997). |
Portland Software, “ZipLock White Paper,” http://web.archive.org/web/19970129185917/www.portsoft.com/zipwhite.htm (Jan. 27, 1997). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,703,951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by PCT Publication No. WO 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5.703.951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,703,951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120117171 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12484695 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13300206 | US | |
Parent | 11889610 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12484695 | US | |
Parent | 11412827 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 11889610 | US | |
Parent | 09231714 | Jan 1999 | US |
Child | 11412827 | US |