Delivering electronic content

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9094479
  • Patent Number
    9,094,479
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 7, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 28, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Delivering electronic content includes providing instructions that might cause a computer to collect information including a network address and transmitting the collected information to a receiving computer. The computer that receives the transmitted information selects electronic content based on the received information and sends the selected electronic content to the network address included in the received information. Access to the electronic content might be selectively granted based on criteria.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention generally relates to delivering electronic content.


2. Related Art


The Internet offers a tremendous amount of information on a wide range of subjects. Many businesses and organizations offer world-wide-web sites that promote products, offer technical assistance, and provide other useful information. Search engines (e.g., Yahoo™) typically can provide lengthy lists of sites related to any topic of interest. Users typically do not want to take the time to investigate more than a handful of these sites. As a result, the vast number of web-sites makes it difficult for web-site providers to lure Internet users to their respective sites.


Since the inception of the web, web-pages have featured links to other sites. A link can appear as underlined text (e.g., “please visit deskgate”), as a picture, or as a sequence of images. Each link has an associated URL (universal resource locator) that identifies a web-site. A link can be programmed to transport a user to a link's associated URL when a user selects the link (e.g., by clicking a mouse button).


To attract users to a site, some businesses rent space on other web-pages. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, a newspaper web-page 100 includes a variety of links to other sites. As shown, the web-page includes a banner 102 (i.e., a picture link in the shape of a banner) linked to a resort's web-site. By selecting the link, the user is transported to the resort's web-page as shown in FIG. 2.


SUMMARY

In general, in one aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes providing instructions that cause a first computer to collect information including an e-mail address, and transmitting the collected information to a second computer. The second computer processes the transmitted information by selecting electronic content for transmission to the e-mail address and e-mailing the selected electronic content.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The instructions can be web-page instructions such as HTML. The instructions can be of a form. The instructions can collect the information by querying the computer or by receiving user input. The information can include demographic information and/or system information.


The processing can be done by a program such as a script (e.g., a CGI script). A URL (universal resource locator) displayed at a browser using the instructions may not be altered by the transmitting of the collected information. The processing can select electronic content based on the transmitted information. The electronic content can include text, graphics, audio, video and/or executable instructions.


The information transmitted can include identification of the instructions that transmitted the information and/or identification of a site that transmitted the information.


In general, in another aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes providing web-page form instructions that cause a first computer to interactively collect an e-mail address from a user and transmit information including the collected address information to a second computer. The method further includes processing the transmitted information at the second computer by using the transmitted information to select electronic content and e-mailing the selected electronic content to the transmitted e-mail address.


In general, in another aspect, a method of delivering electronic content includes storing electronic content corresponding to different sets of instructions, receiving a request for electronic content produced by one of the sets of instructions, the request including a network address, and selecting electronic content from the stored electronic content based on the received request. The selected electronic content is transmitted to the network address included in the request.


In general, in another aspect, a computer-implemented method of providing access to electronic content includes displaying in a browser a web-page that includes a link corresponding to electronic content and in response to a user's selection of the link, collecting information without modifying the web-page displayed in the browser. The collected information is transmitted to a remote server, and electronic content from the remote server is sent to the e-mail address based on the collected information.


In general, in another aspect, a computer program, disposed on a computer readable medium, includes instructions for causing a first computer's processor to receive information collected by instructions at a second computer, and based on the received information, select electronic content and transmit the electronic content to an e-mail address included in the received information.


Advantages may include one or more of the following. By linking an e-mail based electronic content delivery system to a web-page, businesses can enjoy the benefits of reaching “web-surfers” without the cost and/or computer resources needed to maintain a web-site. Linking in this manner also provides Internet users with the ability to get more information about a topic without leaving a web-page and without waiting for graphics and other information to be transmitted to their browser. A business providing electronic content can not only receive demographic data describing interested users, but also can determine which web-pages are most effective in producing requests for information.


Other advantages of the invention will become apparent in view of the following description, including the figures, and the claims.





DRAWING DESCRIPTIONS


FIG. 1 is a screenshot of web-page that includes a banner, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a screenshot of a web-page reached via the banner of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a screenshot of a web-page that includes a link, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a screenshot of a submission confirmation window, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 5 is a screenshot of an e-mail message including electronic content, according to principles of the invention.



FIGS. 6A-6B are listings of web-page instructions, according to principles of the invention.



FIGS. 7A-7C are diagrams illustrating delivery of electronic content, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 7D is a block diagram of an embodiment of electronic content, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 7E is a flow diagram showing steps of processing notification instructions, according to principals of the invention.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of distribution software, according to principles of the invention.



FIG. 9 is an exemplary diagram of a computer system, according to principles of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 3, a web-page 104 viewed by a network browser (e.g., Netscapep™ Navigator) uses text and graphics to present information to a user. As shown, the text and graphics include information related to a business enterprise. The web-page 104 also includes a form 106 that accepts user input. As shown, the form 106 includes a text entry control 108, and a submit button 110. The form 106 also provides a graphic image 112 designed to attract attention. As shown, the form assumes the shape traditionally associated with banner-links (e.g., a bordered rectangle) but other shapes or formats could be used. The banner shape can communicate to a user that the form 106 is associated with a web-site other than the site the user is currently visiting. The form 106 can include other user input controls (not shown), for example, checkboxes that identify different areas of interest (e.g., “send me information on golf clubs” and “send me information on golf vacations”).


Unlike a conventional banner-link, interaction with the form 106 does not transport the user to a different web-site. Instead, submitting entered information into the form (e.g., by typing information into the text box and then clicking the submit button 110) transmits the information entered by the user to a remote web-server without changing the current URL being displayed by the browser. The remote web-server uses the transmitted information to select and deliver electronic content (e.g., text, graphics, audio, video, and executable instructions) via e-mail. Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/199,150 entitled “Tracking Electronic Content” filed Nov. 24, 1998, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,670, describes an electronic content delivery system, and is incorporated by reference.


Referring to FIG. 4, as shown, a user has entered a network e-mail address into the text field 108 and clicked the submit button 110. This action initiates transmission of the entered information to the remote web-server. After submitting the information, a window 114 appears informing a user that the information has been transmitted. The feedback provided by the window 114 prevents users from making repeated submissions in the mistaken belief their request failed.



FIG. 5 shows the interface for an e-mail client. After the remote web-server has received the transmitted information, it selects the appropriate electronic content and e-mails the selected electronic content to the specified e-mail address. The requestor then can view or otherwise access the delivered content using the e-mail client. As shown, the electronic content may be transmitted as an e-mail attachment 120. By delivering electronic content via e-mail, users can request information without interrupting their use of a currently displayed web-page 104 and without waiting for a linked site's web-page to load. Additionally, a business can deliver the content to an Internet user without the cost and expense of maintaining a web-site or reserving an Internet address.


Referring to FIGS. 6A-6B, a network browser constructs a web-page's appearance from web-page instructions 104. These instructions 104 can be expressed in HTML (Hypertext Markup Language), Java, or other formats. When a user visits a web-page, the instructions 104 for the page are transmitted to the user's computer for processing by the user's browser. The instructions 104 describe the appearance and behavior of web-page elements. For example, the instructions describe the form 106, the graphic image 112, the text control 108, and submit button 110. The instructions 104 include instructions 120 for transmitting collected information to the remote web-server for processing. As shown, the instructions 106 identify a program 122 at a remote web-server and specify values for different parameters 124a-124c. The remote server program processes the parameters to select electronic content to deliver to a specified e-mail address 108. As shown, the program is a CGI (Common Gateway Interface) script, however, programs written in other programming languages can also process the collected information (e.g., a Perl script or a Java or C++ program).


As shown, the instructions 106 transmit the e-mail address 124c interactively collected from a user and an identification of the electronic content 124b to deliver to the e-mail address specified 124c. Instead of hard-coding the content to deliver 124b, the instructions 120 can transmit an I.D. that identifies electronic content to transmit. For example, different I.D.s can be assigned to different sets of instructions 120. That is, an I.D. for the golf promotion form may be “001” while the I.D. for a car promotion form may be “002”. Though the same instructions 120 can be incorporated into different web-pages, the remote server can use the I.D. to select the electronic content to transmit (e.g., information on the golf or car promotion). By using an I.D. instead of hard-coding a reference to electronic content, electronic content transmitted to a user can be easily altered.


The instructions 106 can be copied into different web-pages to reach more web users. To identify the site that produced a request for electronic content, the instructions 106 can transmit a site identification token 124a of the site transmitting the information. This information can be hard-coded (as shown) or dynamically determined by interacting with a browser's API (Application Programming Interface). By transmitting the site token 124a, the remote web-server can identify which web-pages produced the most number of requests for content.


The instructions 106 can be configured to interactively collect a wide variety of information from a user in addition to an e-mail address. Such information can include demographic information (e.g., name, address, and age) or information describing a user's interests. The electronic content transmitted by the remote server can be selected based on this information.


Additionally, the instructions 106 can dynamically access a body of information stored, for example, on the user's computer, and then transmit that information to the remote web-server. For example, the instructions can access a Windows™ registry on the user's computer to collect user and system information relating to the computer executing the instructions.


Though the instructions 106 shown produce a form, the instructions 106 that collect an e-mail message by querying a user's computer (e.g., by accessing the Windows™ registry) could instead present a simple picture or text (e.g., “Click here for e-mail information on golf”). When a user clicks on the picture or text, the instructions 106 dynamically collect the user's e-mail address and other information from the system and transmit the collected information to the remote server without requiring any data entry by the user.


Referring to FIG. 7A-7C, a remote web-server 132 delivers electronic content 138 based on a user's interaction with a web-page 104. As shown in FIG. 7A, a user's computer 126 runs browser software 128. When the user navigates (e.g., by following a link or entering a URL) to a web-site, the web server 130 for that web-site transmits web-page instructions 104 to the user's computer 126. The user's browser 126 processes the web-page instructions 104 for display (as shown in FIG. 3).


Referring to FIG. 7B, the web-page 104 includes instructions 106 for collecting and transmitting information to the remote server 132. When a user submits a request for electronic content (e.g., clicking the submit button 110), the information 124 collected from a user and/or system is transmitted to the remote web-server 132. As described above, the information 124 includes an e-mail address and can include other information such as an I.D. and/or the address of the site 126 producing the request 124.


Referring to FIG. 7C, the remote web-server 132 includes a program 134 for processing the transmitted information 124. The program 134 can be a CGI script or alternatively a Perl, Java, or C++ program. The remote web-server also stores electronic content 138 for transmission to a requesting user. The remote web-server 132 also may include a table 136 that stores the electronic content 138 that should be sent in response to an I.D. included received information. The remote web-server 132 selects and transmits the electronic content 138a via e-mail to the e-mail address specified in the received information 124.


The remote web-server 132 produces reports based on requests that indicate which addresses received content, which web-pages produced content requests, and demographic information describing the user's requesting information. Thus, businesses can closely track their efforts at reaching users.


The remote web-server 132 can store electronic content 138 corresponding to any number of different sets of instructions 106 (e.g., different forms). Thus, a single web-server 132 can provide electronic content delivery for a large number of different businesses or organizations. Processing requests for content typically consumes considerable computational resources on the processing computer. In addition, storing the content 138 typically requires a large volume of non-volatile storage. By letting a remote web-server dedicated to processing requests handle delivery and storage of content, the computers associated with the various enterprises will not be slowed or otherwise burdened by the processing of requests during business hours.


Referring to FIG. 7D, the electronic content 138 may include electronic content 138b such as text, graphics, audio, video, and/or executable files. Electronic content 138 may also include notification instructions 138c that may be executable instructions that collect and transmit notification information. The notification instructions 138c may be configured to control access to the electronic content 138b. Further, different electronic content may use different file formats. When executed, notification instructions 138c can determine whether a previous attempt to access the electronic content 138b resulted in success (e.g., successful transmission of notification information or receipt of an access granting message). The notification instructions 138c may interactively collect notification information from a recipient. The notification instructions 138c may interactively collect notification information from a recipient. The notification instructions 138c may also collect information by querying the recipient's computer system.



FIG. 7E is a flow diagram showing steps of processing the notification instructions, according to principles of the invention, starting at step 700. At step 705, a check is made whether notification information was transmitted successfully previously. If successful, then the process continues at step 730. Otherwise, if the notification information has not been successfully transmitted, then at step 710, notification information may be collected. At step 715, an attempt to transmit the notification information may be made. At step 720, a check may be made to determine if the transmission of notification information was successful. If not successful, then at step 722, access is denied to the electronic content. If, however, the transmission of notification information was successful, then at step 725, an indicator may be stored indicating successful transmission. At step 730, a prompt for a password may occur. At step 735, a check may be made whether a correct password was entered. If the password was not correctly entered then, at step 750, an attempt to transmit notification information may occur. At step 755, access to electronic content may be denied. If, however, a correct password was entered, or, if prompted for, then at step 740, access may be granted to the electronic content (e.g., decompress and decrypt). At step 745, an attempt to transmit notification information may occur.


Referring to FIG. 8, the program 134 running on the remote web-server 132 processes information to select and e-mail electronic content to a specified e-mail address. After receiving a request for electronic content (140), the program 134 may repress transmission of information to a user's browser (e.g., for example by issuing an “echo status: 202 No Response” command). This command prevents a user's display from being altered.


The program 134 can use the I.D. to determine which electronic content to send to a specified address (142). The program 134 can also analyze demographic data included in the received information 124 to select electronic content for delivery. After selecting the electronic content, the program 134 can e-mail the determined content (144) to the e-mail address specified in the request 124.


Referring to FIG. 9, a computer platform 146 includes a monitor 148, input devices such as a keyboard 150 and mouse 151, and a digital computer 152. The digital computer 152 includes memory 154, a processor 156, a mass storage device 164a (e.g., a hard disk) and a network connection 160 for transmitting and receiving data. The mass storage device 164a includes instructions for an operating system 162 (e.g., Windows™ 98), distribution software 134, and electronic content 138. These instructions can be stored in other computer readable mediums such as a floppy disk 164b, a CD-ROM drive 164c, or other hardware such as an EPROM 164d. In the course of operation, the stored instructions are transferred to memory 154 and the processor 156 for execution.


The techniques described here are not limited to any particular hardware or software configuration. The techniques may be implemented in hardware or software, or a combination of the two. Preferably, the techniques are implemented in computer programs executing on programmable computers that each include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices. Program code is applied to data entered using the input device to perform the functions described and to generate output information. The output information is applied to one or more output devices.


Each program is preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.


Each such computer program is preferably stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform the procedures described in this document. The system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer to operate in a specific and predefined manner.


Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A network-based system for delivering electronic content, the system comprising: a server interconnected to a network, the server configured to select electronic content from a database; andthe database containing selectable electronic content,wherein the server is configured to select specific electronic content from the selectable electronic content based on at least one of a request for data and identifying information received from a first computer, andwherein the server is configured to initiate transmission of the selected specific electronic content to a network location in the network indicated by the identifying information, the network location being an address associated with the first computer, andwherein the first computer sends the identifying information based on instructions provided to the first computer by accessing a web page, the instructions configured to dynamically provide the identifying information and additional information obtained at the first computer, and the instructions configured to determine whether the selected specific electronic content has been previously accessed at the first computer, andwherein the instructions are configured to grant or deny access to the selected specific electronic content based on a result of an attempt to transmit notification information indicating an access attempt to the selected specific electronic content.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions are configured to attempt to send notification information to the server as a result of an attempt to access the selected electronic content.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the selectable electronic content comprises different types of selectable electronic content.
  • 4. A system for delivering electronic content, the system comprising: a second computer interconnected to a network, the second computer configured to provide a message to deliver executable instructions that are configured to cause a first computer to initiate transmission of identifying information to the second computer in response to a request for data from the first computer; anda database containing different electronic content and accessible by the second computer;wherein the second computer is configured to select a specific electronic content from among the different electronic content based on at least one of the request for data and the identifying information,wherein the second computer is configured to initiate transmission of the selected specific electronic content to a network location associated with the first computer,wherein the instructions are configured to dynamically provide the identifying information including additional information obtained at the first computer, and configured to attempt to send notification information to the second computer as a result of an attempt to access the selected specific electronic content at the first computer, andwherein the instructions are configured to control access to the selected specific electronic content subsequent to the attempt to transmit notification information.
  • 5. The system of claim 4 wherein the instructions are configured to determine whether the selected specific electronic content has been previously accessed.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the selected specific electronic content comprises at least any one of: text, video, data, computer instructions and audio information.
  • 7. The system of claim 4, wherein the second computer comprises a server.
  • 8. The system of claim 4, wherein the message comprises an e-mail.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the message comprises a web-page accessible by the first computer.
  • 10. The system of claim 4, wherein the executable instructions are expressed in a markup language.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the markup language is expressed in Hypertext Markup Language (HTML).
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the executable instructions are configured to determine whether the selected specific electronic content has been previously accessed at the first computer.
  • 13. The system of claim 4, wherein the executable instructions are configured to transmit a site identification token to the first computer.
  • 14. The system of claim 4, wherein the executable instructions are embodied in different web pages having respective identifications and the executable instructions are configured to transmit a respective web site identification token to the first computer.
  • 15. The system of claim 4, wherein the additional information includes at least any one or more of: demographic information, user supplied information and system information related to the first computer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,206 filed Nov. 18, 2011, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,396,933, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/484,695 filed Jun. 15, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,086,746, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/889,610 filed Aug. 15, 2007, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,150, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/412,827 filed Apr. 28, 2006, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,655, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/231,714 filed Jan. 15, 1999, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,127,515, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (158)
Number Name Date Kind
4471163 Donald et al. Sep 1984 A
4528643 Freeny Jul 1985 A
4558176 Arnold et al. Dec 1985 A
4658093 Hellman Apr 1987 A
4683553 Mollier Jul 1987 A
4796220 Wolfe Jan 1989 A
4888798 Earnest et al. Dec 1989 A
4999806 Chernow et al. Mar 1991 A
5023907 Johnson et al. Jun 1991 A
5033084 Beecher Jul 1991 A
5057935 Williams Oct 1991 A
5103476 Waite et al. Apr 1992 A
5113518 Durst, Jr. et al. May 1992 A
5191611 Lang Mar 1993 A
5204897 Wyman Apr 1993 A
5319705 Halter et al. Jun 1994 A
5337357 Chou et al. Aug 1994 A
5351293 Michener et al. Sep 1994 A
5390297 Barber et al. Feb 1995 A
5457746 Dolphin Oct 1995 A
5490216 Richardson, III Feb 1996 A
5509070 Schull Apr 1996 A
5615264 Kazmierczak et al. Mar 1997 A
5629980 Stefik et al. May 1997 A
5654746 McMullan, Jr. et al. Aug 1997 A
5666411 McCarty Sep 1997 A
5671276 Eyer et al. Sep 1997 A
5671279 Elgamal Sep 1997 A
5673316 Auerbach et al. Sep 1997 A
5677953 Dolphin Oct 1997 A
5703279 Igura et al. Dec 1997 A
5703951 Dolphin Dec 1997 A
5708709 Rose Jan 1998 A
5708780 Levergood et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5724424 Gifford Mar 1998 A
5734822 Houha et al. Mar 1998 A
5757907 Cooper et al. May 1998 A
5765152 Erickson Jun 1998 A
5778173 Apte Jul 1998 A
5778367 Wesinger, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5784460 Blumenthal et al. Jul 1998 A
5790664 Coley et al. Aug 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794207 Walker et al. Aug 1998 A
5796952 Davis et al. Aug 1998 A
5809145 Silk et al. Sep 1998 A
5845281 Benson et al. Dec 1998 A
5862325 Reed et al. Jan 1999 A
5889860 Eller et al. Mar 1999 A
5889943 Ji et al. Mar 1999 A
5892825 Mages et al. Apr 1999 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5898777 Tyckson, Jr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5905860 Olsen et al. May 1999 A
5920861 Hall et al. Jul 1999 A
5926624 Katz et al. Jul 1999 A
5940504 Griswold Aug 1999 A
5949875 Walker et al. Sep 1999 A
5956505 Manduley Sep 1999 A
5958005 Thorne et al. Sep 1999 A
5958051 Renaud et al. Sep 1999 A
5959945 Kleiman Sep 1999 A
5963915 Kirsch Oct 1999 A
5982889 DeMont Nov 1999 A
6014688 Venkatraman et al. Jan 2000 A
6021491 Renaud Feb 2000 A
6035329 Mages et al. Mar 2000 A
6041411 Wyatt Mar 2000 A
6055570 Nielsen Apr 2000 A
6067526 Powell May 2000 A
6067622 Moore May 2000 A
6073124 Krishnan et al. Jun 2000 A
6073256 Sesma Jun 2000 A
6075862 Yoshida et al. Jun 2000 A
6098056 Rusnak et al. Aug 2000 A
6108637 Blumenau Aug 2000 A
6134592 Montulli Oct 2000 A
6135646 Kahn et al. Oct 2000 A
6138149 Ohmura Oct 2000 A
6144942 Ruckdashel Nov 2000 A
6178442 Yamazaki Jan 2001 B1
6192396 Kohler Feb 2001 B1
6205485 Kikinis Mar 2001 B1
6226618 Downs et al. May 2001 B1
6236971 Stefik et al. May 2001 B1
6240396 Walker et al. May 2001 B1
6243468 Pearce et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253193 Ginter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256664 Donoho et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256672 Redpath Jul 2001 B1
6266692 Greenstein Jul 2001 B1
6286103 Maillard et al. Sep 2001 B1
6288738 Dureau et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289461 Dixon Sep 2001 B1
6301660 Benson Oct 2001 B1
6304897 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314454 Wang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327610 Uchida et al. Dec 2001 B2
6332156 Cho et al. Dec 2001 B1
6385596 Wiser et al. May 2002 B1
6389541 Patterson May 2002 B1
6393468 McGee May 2002 B1
6449719 Baker Sep 2002 B1
6484156 Gupta et al. Nov 2002 B1
6526456 Allan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6567793 Hicks et al. May 2003 B1
6684248 Janacek et al. Jan 2004 B1
6751670 Patterson Jun 2004 B1
6807534 Erickson Oct 2004 B1
6868403 Wiser et al. Mar 2005 B1
6941459 Hind et al. Sep 2005 B1
6965993 Baker Nov 2005 B2
7010808 Leung et al. Mar 2006 B1
7035407 Hasegawa Apr 2006 B1
7036011 Grimes et al. Apr 2006 B2
7127515 Patterson Oct 2006 B2
7171558 Mourad et al. Jan 2007 B1
7206941 Raley et al. Apr 2007 B2
7233948 Shamoon et al. Jun 2007 B1
7246246 Kupka et al. Jul 2007 B2
7251832 Venters et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272655 Patterson Sep 2007 B2
7272858 Parks et al. Sep 2007 B2
7386473 Blumenau Jun 2008 B2
7395436 Nemovicher Jul 2008 B1
7395438 Parks et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421741 Phillips et al. Sep 2008 B2
7480382 Dunbar et al. Jan 2009 B2
7484103 Woo et al. Jan 2009 B2
7496610 Boris et al. Feb 2009 B2
7562150 Patterson Jul 2009 B2
7673059 Patterson Mar 2010 B2
7752466 Ginter et al. Jul 2010 B2
7904568 Rudd Mar 2011 B2
20020107850 Sugimoto et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020161709 Floyd et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194485 Ram et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030046238 Nonaka et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046274 Erickson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030079133 Breiter et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030120928 Cato et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030163431 Ginter et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030236906 Klemets et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040054584 Boon Mar 2004 A1
20040117500 Lindholm et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125957 Rauber et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153451 Phillips et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050004978 Reed et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021477 Krishnan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021633 Venkatraman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050049002 White et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060129847 Pitsos Jun 2006 A1
20060179489 Mas Ribes Aug 2006 A1
20060195400 Patterson Aug 2006 A1
20060294237 Nguyen Dec 2006 A1
20090100268 Garcia et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090259727 Patterson Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2220457 May 1998 CA
0717338 Jun 1996 EP
1085443 Mar 2001 EP
9-044353 Feb 1997 JP
10-232918 Sep 1998 JP
11-161663 Jun 1999 JP
11-328848 Nov 1999 JP
2000-137649 May 2000 JP
2002-111613 Apr 2001 JP
2001-160003 Jun 2001 JP
2001-175606 Jun 2001 JP
2001-197055 Jul 2001 JP
2001-209309 Aug 2001 JP
2001-332019 Nov 2001 JP
2001-357008 Dec 2001 JP
2002-163571 Jun 2002 JP
2002-251348 Sep 2002 JP
2002-334033 Nov 2002 JP
2002-334062 Nov 2002 JP
2004-054930 Feb 2004 JP
WO 9627155 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9830964 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9858306 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9913398 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0201330 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0201335 Jan 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (81)
Entry
Expert Report of Dr. Stephen B. Wicker Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,389,541, 6,751,670, 7,127,515, 7,272,655, 7,562,150, 7,421,741, and 7,673,059; Case No.: 12-CV-01971 CW; United States District Court Northern District of California Oakland Division; 2013.
Olin Sibert et al., “DigiBox: A Self-Protecting Container for Information Commerce,” Proceedings of the First USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce (Jul. 1995) 14 page.
TragoeS, “Right Market Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ),” http://web.archive.org/web/19980209124057/tragoes.com/FAQ.html (Jun. 30, 1997).
“ZipLock Server Delivers the flexibility to do ESD business your way,” http://www.fillipdesign.com/portfolio/www/ziplock/system3/components/compsrvr.html (1997).
Portland Software, “ZipLock White Paper,” http://web.archive.org/web/19970129185917/www.portsoft.com/zipwhite.htm (Jan. 27, 1997).
Mark A Kaplan “IBM Cryptolopes, SuperDistribution and Digital Rights Management” Dec. 30, 1996, pp. 1-9.
“Ziplock White Paper” Jan. 27, 1997, pp. 1-12.
Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern California “Transmission Control Protocol DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification” Sep. 1981, preface to p. 85.
Butler Lampson “Anti-Piracy” Oct. 26, 1997, pp. 1-9.
Steve R. White and Liam Comerford “ABYSS: An Architecture for Software Protection” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. vol. 16 No. 6 Jun. 1990, pp. 619-629.
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Portland Software Intros. “ZipLock ESD Commerce Sys. for Microsoft Site Server 3.0, Commerce Edition,”0 Press Release, http://www.fillipdesign.com/portfolio/www/portsoft/info/press/pr012698.htm (Jan. 26, 1998).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,703,951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
PR Newswire “Silver Bullet for Digital Publishing Arrives TragoeS Announces General Availability of RightsMarket (TM)” Dec. 2, 1997, pp. 1-4.
“Semantic Web, Recent Trends of technologies and applications in the Semantic Web”, Makoto Imamuma, et al. Jan. 31, 2003.
“Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL)”, Version 1.1, Renato Iannella, Aug. 8, 2002.
Stuffit Deluxe 5.0, Award-winning, industry compression by Aladdin Systems, Sep. 1998.
Stuffit Deluxe 5.0; The Complete Compression Solution; modified Jan. 7, 1999, pp. 1-3; http://www.Aladdinsys.com/deluxe/benefits.html.
WinZip Home Page: Do you have Questions about WinZip? Check our FAQ page; Apr. 26, 1999; http://www.winzip.com/.
Setting Up a Web Store: A White Paper for Software Developers and Publishers; 1997 Release Software Corp.; pp. 1-18; http://www.releasesoftware.com/whitep/isvwhitepaper.rtf.
Netdox Brochure, “Certified Verified Anytime” (12 pages)—1997.
Netdox Brochure 1997—Doxit Service Overview (5 pages).
Tumbleweed Software, “POSTA”; http://www.posta.com/posta/posta—overview.html (3 pages)—Sep. 1998.
InterTrust Technology “MetalTrust Overview”; http://www.intertrust.com/technology/tech.html (8 pages)—1998.
InterTrust Technologies Corporation: Overview: InterTrust Powers the New Digital Economy, A Piece of the Tick—Verison 2.0, Oct. 9, 1998 (38 pages).
Vbox White Paper, http://www.previewsystems.com/products/vbox/whitepaper/white—paper.html (13 pages)—1998.
G. Griswold, “A Meth. for Protecting Copyright on Networks,” Proceedings, Tech. Strategies for Protecting I. P. in the Networked Multimedia Envir., Jan. 1994, p. 169-179, v.1.
Setting Up a Web Store: A White Paper for Software Resellers; 1997 Release Software Corp.; pp. 1-17; http://www.releasesoftware.com/whitep/resellerwhitepaper.rtf—1997.
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,703,951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,127,515 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Adobe and eBooks,” pp. 1-4 (Sep. 1999).
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Adobe and Digital Content for eCommerce,” pp. 1-8 (Sep. 1999).
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Working with Adobe PDF Merchant,” pp. 1-24 (2000).
Brad Cox, Superdistribution: Objects as Property on the Electronic Frontier (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1996).
IBM Corp., “Chapter 1. The Cryptolope Live! Product,” IBM Cryptolope Live!, General Information Guide, Version 1, Release 1, pp. 1-36 (1997).
The Electronic Book Exchange System (EBX), Version 0.8 (Book Industry Study Group, Inc., Jul. 2000 Draft).
FLEXIm End User Manual, http://www.vcpc.univie.ac.at/information/software/pgi/flexuser/TOC.htm (Jun. 1996).
Marc A. Kaplan, “IBM Cryptolopes, SuperDistribution and Digital Rights Management,” http://www.research.ibm.com/people/k/kaplan (1996).
Ulrich Kohl et al., “Safeguarding Digital Library Contents and Users,” D-Lib Magazine, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september97/ibm/09lotspiech.html (Sep. 1997).
Jean-Henry Morin et al., “Commercialization of Electronic Information,” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 524-529 (Jun. 7-11, 1999).
U.S. Appl. No. 60/058,623, filed Sep. 11, 1997, Peterson.
EP Supp. Search Report, Jan. 17, 2006, EPO.
JP 2006-507079 Of. Action, Jan. 26, 2010, JIPO.
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,629,980 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5.703.951 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,949,875 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,246,246 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,386,473 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 7,752,466 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by PCT Publication No. WO 2002/0161709 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,272,655 by U.S. Patent No. 5,457,746 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 5,956,505as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,108,637 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,256,664 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Invalidity chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,562,150 by U.S. Patent No. 6,304,897 as submitted in Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00305-LED, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division ( Feb. 2012).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140047006 A1 Feb 2014 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 13300206 Nov 2011 US
Child 13761902 US
Parent 12484695 Jun 2009 US
Child 13300206 US
Parent 11889610 Aug 2007 US
Child 12484695 US
Parent 11412827 Apr 2006 US
Child 11889610 US
Parent 09231714 Jan 1999 US
Child 11412827 US