When a user requests a web page or other content page via a browser, the user typically experiences a noticeable delay before the page is fully or even partially displayed. Various factors can contribute to this delay. These factors include, for example, (1) the speed of the wireless or wired connection between the user's device and the Internet, (2) the location of, and load on, the origin server that hosts the page, (3) the size of the page, including any embedded graphics, (4) whether, and the extent to which, the page includes embedded objects that need to be separately retrieved (possibly from different domains) once the page's HTML has been loaded, (5) the complexity of the page's coding, including any scripts, and (6) the processing power of the user's device. When the delay is significant (e.g., several seconds or more), the task of browsing can be frustrating for users.
Throughout the drawings, reference numbers may be re-used to indicate correspondence between referenced elements. The drawings are provided to illustrate example embodiments described herein and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
A process is disclosed for providing users with page previews during page loading events, such that the delay experienced before the display of page content is reduced. The process may be implemented partly or wholly within an intermediary system that sits logically between user devices and content servers. In some embodiments, the process may be implemented by a content delivery network (CDN). The process may be used with existing browsers without the need for any browser modifications, or may be used with a “preview-aware” browser that includes special program code for providing page previews. When such “preview-aware” browsers are used, the process may be implemented by a third party server that does not act as an intermediary.
According to one embodiment, the intermediary system prefetches content pages, such as web pages, of various content sites, and generates and caches previews of these pages. The previews may include or consist of screenshot images (“screenshots”) of the pages, such that minimal browser processing is required to display the previews. Different previews (e.g., with different screenshot resolutions) of the same page may be generated and cached for different user device types or form factors, such as smart phones, tablets, PCs, etc. In some embodiments, some or all of the links (or other active content) of the pages may be preserved when the previews are generated, such that users can, for example, select/follow links while viewing the preview. In some embodiments, a preview may not include any screenshots, or may include a combination of screenshot and non-screenshot files; for example, a preview can be delivered in two parts: a screenshot containing all of the non-textual of the page, and a textual overlay containing the page's textual content.
In one embodiment, when a user device requests a page for which a preview exists, the intermediary system returns a cached preview of the page as it retrieves the actual page (typically from a corresponding origin server). The browser running on the user device displays this preview while the intermediary system retrieves and delivers the page. (The intermediary system may pre-render or otherwise modify portions of the actual page before delivering it to browser.) The preview may continue to be displayed as the browser renders the page in the background. Once the actual page is loaded, the browser updates the display by replacing the preview with the actual page. If the user scrolls down or zooms in on the preview before this update occurs, the browser preferably applies such scrolling or zooming to the actual page when updating the display.
In some embodiments or use cases, rather than returning the actual page, the intermediary system may only return one or more portions of the page. For example, the intermediary system may only return the portions that differ (or differ in a meaningful way) from the preview, or may only return those portions that were delivered as screenshots. In these embodiments, the browser may be configured to update the display of the page preview by replacing or overwriting one or more specific portions of the preview.
The intermediary system may, in some embodiments, predictively prefetch pages for particular users during browsing sessions of such users, and may generate and cache (or preemptively deliver) previews of these pages. For example, when the intermediary system retrieves a page on behalf of a user/device, it may predictively follow some or all of the links on the page, and generate previews of these pages. If the user subsequently selects one of the predictively followed links, the intermediary system may then deliver the preview as described above. Where predictive prefetching is implemented, the intermediary system may maintain copies of users' cookies, and may transmit the relevant cookie when predictively following a link; thus, the predictively prefetched pages (and their previews) may be personalized for users.
The content sites 34 may include or consist of ordinary web sites. The pages for which page previews are generated can be conventional web pages that do not include any special coding or formatting to support the generation of previews as described herein. In some embodiments, however, the intermediary system 30 may support the use of special preview tags for designating whether or how page previews should be generated for particular pages. Where preview tags are supported, a content provider may, for example, embed tags in a content page indicating, for example, which visual elements or sections of the page should be converted into screenshots.
As shown in
Each time a page is prefetched, the preview generator 42 generates a preview of the prefetched page, and stores the preview in the cache 44 in place of the most recently generated preview. The preview generator may generate and cache multiple previews of the same page, with each being tailored to a particular device or device characteristic (e.g., screen size, browser, touch screen versus non-touch screen, etc.). The previews may include or consist of screenshots of the prefetched pages or portions thereof. In some embodiments, the previews may also include HTML code, including HTML image maps that enable users to select links depicted in the screenshots and access the linked content.
As depicted by the data repository 46, various types of configuration data may be maintained and used to control the process of prefetching pages and generating page previews. This data may include, for example, a list of the sites or pages that are eligible for prefetching, data regarding prefetch intervals to be used for particular pages or sites, and data regarding the devices or device characteristics for which previews are to be generated. As mentioned above, the intermediary system 30 may also maintain copies of the browser cookies stored on particular user devices 32, and may use these cookies to predictively prefetch pages for specific users.
In addition or as an alternative to using a page prefetcher 40, the intermediary system 30 may generate the previews from page content retrieved by the intermediary system 30 on behalf of the user devices.
In event 2, the intermediary system 30 generates and caches a preview of the page. If the page was prefetched without use of a cookie corresponding to the user device 32, the intermediary system 30 may subsequently deliver this preview to any user device that subsequently requests the page. If prefetched using a cookie, the preview may be designated as being personal to the user device 32, or to a user or user account associated with the user device 32.
When generating the preview, the intermediary system 30 may generate a screenshot of the entire page, or may generate multiple screenshots, each of a different respective portion of the page. To preserve active content (links and other selectable elements) on the page, the preview generator may also generate an image map for each screenshot. Each such image map specifies the coordinates within the screenshot of one or more hot spots, and specifies the target URL of each such hot spot, as is known in the art. To reduce the complexity of the image maps, the intermediary system 30 may, in some cases, only include hot spots of some of the links on the page, such as those that are selected the most frequently by users. In some cases, the intermediary system may, in generating a page preview, store some or all of the page's text in a non-image format; for example, the intermediary system 30 may create a text overlay file that can be combined by the browser 50 with an image file to produce the page preview.
In event 3, the user device 32 subsequently requests the page. In events 4 and 5, which may overlap in time (e.g., may be performed in parallel) or be performed in a different order than shown, the intermediary system 30 responds to the page request by (a) returning the cached page preview to the user device 32, and (b) retrieving the requested page from the content site 34 on behalf of the user device 32. The process used to deliver the preview in event 4 may depend on whether the device's browser 50 supports the display of page previews. If it does not, as in the case of a conventional browser, the intermediary system 30 may first return a special HTML file, referred to herein as an HTML preview file, that instructs the browser 50 to retrieve one or more cached screenshots (or other cached preview objects) from the intermediary system 30. This process will be discussed below with reference to
In event 6, which may overlap with event 5 and/or event 7, the browser 50 displays the page preview. Typically, the page preview is displayed noticeably faster than the actual page would be displayed if no previews were delivered. There are a several reasons for this. First, because the preview is already cached on the intermediary system 30, the round trip delay associated with retrieving the page from the content site 34 is avoided. Second, the additional round-trip delays associated with requesting any embedded objects from the content server 34 or a third party server (e.g., a CDN server) are typically avoided. Third, depending upon the process used to generate the preview, the preview may be capable of being delivered and displayed more rapidly than the actual page. For example, complex coding that ordinarily results in a browser 50 processing delay may be omitted from the preview, allowing it to be displayed more rapidly upon its arrival.
The speed at which the preview is delivered and displayed can be further increased by optimizing the previews for specific device types or form factors. For example, a lower screenshot resolution may be used for smart phones versus tablets, so that the screenshots can be delivered faster. (The screenshot resolutions may also be selected based on aggregated, browser-reported data regarding how frequently and quickly mobile device users tend to zoom-in on the particular page or on pages in general.) As another example, a page may be subdivided (for purposes of generating multiple screenshots) based on the screen dimensions of the user device. For example, one screenshot may be generated for the “above-the-fold” portion of the page that, given the device's screen dimensions, would appear on the screen when the page is first displayed. One or more additional screenshots may be generated of the remainder (below-the-fold) portion of the page to which the user can scroll, if desired. With this approach, the above-the-fold screenshot may be delivered and displayed first, so that the above-the-fold portion of the preview is displayed faster than would be possible if a single screenshot were used for the entire page.
In some embodiments or use cases, the intermediary system 30 may only deliver the above-the-fold screenshot, such that no below-the-fold content is included in the preview. This may be suitable or desirable where the user is unlikely to scroll down on the page during the preview-display stage. The intermediary system 30 may determine whether to use this approach for a particular page based on one or more factors, such as (1) data regarding how frequently (and how quickly) users scroll down on the particular page, and (2) the estimated amount of time the preview will be displayed before it is replaced with the actual page.
In event 7, the intermediary system 30 delivers to the browser a non-preview version of the page based on the page content retrieved in event 5. This non-preview version may be identical in format to the page retrieved in event 5, or may be a modified or partial version of it. The intermediary system may modify or optimize the retrieved page in various ways to generate the non-preview version, For example, the intermediary system 30 may reduce the resolutions of selected images on the page to enable them to load faster, especially for mobile devices. As another example, the intermediary system may generate and deliver a single file that fully represents the entire page, including embedded images or objects that would ordinarily be separately retrieved by the browser. As yet another example, the intermediary system may only deliver certain portions of the page, such as portions that differ or were omitted from the preview. Thus, the non-preview version delivered in event 7 may differ in format from the page retrieved in event 5, and/or may be an incomplete representation of the actual page.
In some embodiments, the user device 32 may retrieve the actual page from the content site 34, rather than receiving a non-preview version of the page from the intermediary system 30. In such cases, the user device 32 may transmit an initial request to the intermediary system 30 for the preview, and subsequently (or in parallel) request the actual page from the content site 34. The user device 32 or the browser 50 executing thereon may be configured to initially request previews from an intermediary system 30 while still retrieving the actual page from the content site 34. Alternatively, the preview or other data that the intermediary system 30 sends to the user device 32 may instruct the browser 50 to retrieve the actual page from the content site 34 rather than waiting to receive it from the intermediary system 30.
As the non-preview version is loaded on the user device 32, it is maintained hidden by the browser. For example, the non-preview version may be loaded into a hidden “tab,” browser window, or other content display element supported by the browser 50. Events 5 and 7 in
In event 8, the browser 50 replaces the display of the preview with a display of the non-preview version based on the content received in event 7. (If the intermediary system 30 only delivers the portions that differ from the preview, the browser 50 may alternatively update the preview by replacing the relevant portions.) For example, if the non-preview version was loaded and rendered into a hidden tab, the hidden tab may be un-hidden or otherwise made visible, while the tab in which the preview was displayed may be hidden. In typical use case scenarios, this transition occurs a few seconds after the display of the preview. From the user's perspective, the transition from the preview to the actual (non-preview) page is typically similar in appearance to the transition that occurs when a conventional browser finishes loading a page. Thus, the user typically will not be aware that a transition from a preview to the actual page is occurring. Typically, the visual content of the actual page will be the same or similar to that of the preview, especially if the intermediary system 30 generates previews of the page on a frequent basis (e.g., every few minutes).
In some embodiments, the intermediary system 30 may programmatically determine, at the time of a page request, whether to deliver a preview of the requested page. This determination may be based on a variety of factors, such as one or more of the following: (1) the connection speed between the user device 32 and the intermediary system 30, or between the content site 34 and the intermediary system 30, (2) the size and complexity of the requested page, as may be known to the intermediary system 30 based on previous accesses to the page, (3) the average delay (or most recent delay) encountered by the intermediary system 30 when retrieving this page, or when retrieving pages of the target site generally, (4) the frequency with which the content of the page changes.
In event 4, the browser 50 may retrieve the preview screenshot(s) referenced in the HTML preview file. The HTML preview file shown in Table 1 corresponds to a page associated with CNN.com, and references a single screenshot named f4bcecf-4f22-480b-9b6c-dfe5f206089b.jpg. As described herein, multiple screenshots may be used in some embodiments. Illustratively, the screenshot referenced in the HTML preview file shown in Table 1 is not retrieved from http://www.cnn.com or some associated server, but rather from http://static-screenshots.s3.com, which may correspond to the intermediary system 30 or some other server or system associated with the intermediary system 30. The screenshot is of the entire page, and the image map specifies the coordinates of some or all of the links on the page. The user can select/follow links on the page while viewing preview file.
In some embodiments, user interface features other than image maps may be included in the preview. For example, if a content page includes “onmouseover” or “onhover” features that initiate display of supplemental content (e.g., descriptions of items over which a user hovers a mouse), such features may be included in the preview. In additional embodiments, inclusion of such additional user interface features may be based on the characteristics and capabilities of the target user device. For example, if a target device has only a touch screen input and not a mouse input, then the additional processing required to add an “onmouseover” or “onhover” event handler to a preview file may be skipped because such a feature is not easily accessible on the target device. As another example, layout hints or data regarding the structure of the actual content page may be provided along with or for use with the preview. For example, the layout of “div” markup tags may be provided so that features such as double-tap to zoom work as expected with the preview.
The screenshot is initially the only object of the HTML body that is visible to the user. The particular screenshot that is specified may be selected by the intermediary system 30 based on characteristics of the user device 32, such as its form factor or screen size. The characteristics of the device 32 may be communicated to the intermediary system 30 with the page request, or may be looked up by the intermediary system 30 based on a cookie or other identifier transmitted with the page request.
In event 5, the browser 50 may begin the process of preparing a non-preview version of the page for display. A container element, which in this example is an “iframe” element that has been given the ID “frame,” is used to load the current version of the page. In some embodiments, a different container element may be used, such as a “div” or “object” element. As seen in the “frame.src” attribute of the sample HTML file in Table 1, the content of the iframe element is a document located at the http://www.cnn.com URL. The intermediary system 30 has appended the query string “?screenshot_bypass=1” onto the end of the URL. This query string may not be passed to the origin server or some other server associated with http://www.cnn.com. Rather, the query string may be an indicator to the intermediary system 30 that this particular request for the page located at http://www.cnn.com is for the actual page, and not for the screenshot. The presence of the query string “?screenshot_bypass=1” indicates that the HTML preview file has already been transmitted to the user device 32. In some embodiments, other techniques may be used to signal to the intermediary system 30 that a request should be serviced with the actual page rather than a screenshot. For example, cookies, self-posting forms, HTTP headers, and the like may be used to transmit information back to the intermediary system 30.
In event 6, the intermediary system 30 can retrieve the requested page from the origin server, a CDN server, or some other content source associated with the content site 34. In some embodiments, the intermediary system 30 augments the retrieved (actual) page with JavaScript code, or other executable code, that instructs the browser 50 to display the page once the actual page (with or without modifications by the intermediary system) has finished loading. This may be accomplished using a JavaScript “onload” event. As mentioned above, the intermediary system 30 may also make other changes to the page (e.g., reduce resolutions of images) to better optimize it for delivery to and display on particular types of devices.
In event 7, the browser 50 can process and display the non-preview version of the page. As seen in the “frame.onload” attribute, the iframe element is associated with a JavaScript function that executes when the content of the iframe (e.g., http://www.cnn.com) finishes loading. In particular, when the content of the iframe element finishes loading, the function defined in the “frame.onload” attribute executes instructions to display the iframe (e.g., “frame.style.display=block;”) and then hide the screenshot (e.g., “image.style.display=none;”). In some embodiments, the order may be reversed, such that the image is first hidden and then the iframe is displayed.
In some embodiments, additional steps can be taken to make sure the iframe is loaded with a reasonable representation of the final size of the contents within so that scrolling the final document works seamlessly. A <base> tag can be added to the <head> of the document that is loaded into the iframe so that links clicked within the iframe itself are loaded in the parent document, not within the iframe. Finally, the screenshot image can be removed when the iframe loads to alleviate processing and storage pressure on the browser 50.
With further reference to
The preview-aware browser 50 may also include other functionality for enabling the intermediary system 30 to customize or personalize the process for particular users. For example, the browser 50 may collect and report usage data regarding how frequently the user zooms-in on and scrolls down on the preview pages. The intermediary system 30 may use this data to, for example, select the particular screenshots that are best suited for the user's browsing behaviors. The preview-aware browser 50 may also report to the intermediary system 30 other information that may be useful for selecting appropriate screenshots, such as information regarding the user device's processing power, screen size, number of applications running, etc. Further, the preview-aware browser may support one or more special touch screen gestures for interacting with previews. One example of such a gesture is described below.
The preview-aware browser may also support the ability for the intermediary system 30 to deliver only those portions of the actual page that differ or were omitted from the preview. For example, once a preview has been delivered, the intermediary system 30 may, by performing a comparison, determine that a particular section of the page has changed, and may deliver to the browser 50 an HTML sequence corresponding to this section. The preview-aware browser may then replace only that portion of the preview, without replacing any other portions of the preview. As another example, the preview may only include some of the pixel data of an image on the page, in which case the intermediary system may subsequently deliver—and the preview-aware browser fill in—the omitted pixel data.
The preview-aware browser 50 may also include special functionality for rendering previews. For example, as mentioned above, the intermediary system 30 may be configured to deliver both (1) an image file representing the image content of the page, and (2) a non-image overlay file, such as an HTML file, containing the textual content in non-image format. In such embodiments, the browser 50 may be configured to combine these two types of files to generate the preview.
Where this method is used, the intermediary system 30 may, where applicable, subsequently send a new overlay file (without sending a new image file) that is based on the page retrieved in event 5 of
In some embodiments, the system may support a “preview only” browsing mode in which the intermediary system 30, by default, only delivers the page previews (when available), and does not deliver the actual pages. Users may be able to enable and disable this mode via a browser setting, or through a configuration site. Where a preview-aware browser 50 is used, the browser 50 may support a special touch screen gesture that enables the user to request the actual page while viewing its preview. For example, if the user taps twice on a particular area of the screen, the browser could respond by requesting and loading the actual page.
In block 60, the page prefetcher 40 prefetches a page from a content site 34. In block 62, the preview generator 42 selects the first device type for which to generate a preview. Different previews may, for example, be generated for different screen sizes, for different device connection speeds, for different browsers, etc.
In block 64 of
In block 66 of
In block 70, the preview file or files, including any screenshots, are stored in the preview cache 44 in association with the selected device type (e.g., with data indicating to which device types or characteristics the particular screenshots apply). As depicted by block 72, the process may then be repeated for one or more additional device types.
In some embodiments, the intermediary system 30 may be configured to deliver page previews that do include any screenshots. For example, upon receiving a page request from a user device, the intermediary system 30 could (1) return a cached version of the page as the preview, optionally with modifications to support rapid delivery and rendering, and (2) retrieve the actual page, and then (3) deliver the actual page (with or without modifications) to the browser if it differs (or differs significantly) from the preview. When the actual page is delivered, the browser 50 would display it in place of the preview, as described above. The intermediary system 30 may be configured to use this approach for all pages, or to use it selectively based on an analysis of page content. Where no screenshots are included, the task of generating the preview may include, for example, eliminating scripts, eliminating advertisements, and/or reducing resolutions of embedded images.
The intermediary system 30 may be implemented by or on a computing system that comprises one or more physical computing devices (physical servers, storage arrays, routers, etc.), each of which may include a processor and memory. The computing system may, in some cases, include computing devices that are distributed geographically, in which case some of the disclosed server-side tasks may be performed remotely from others. The various functions of the intermediary system 30 may be embodied in code modules executed by the computing system. The code modules may be persistently stored on any type or types of non-transitory computer storage devices or media (magnetic disks, solid state memories, optical drives, etc.). Some or all of the disclosed processes of the intermediary system 30 may alternatively be embodied partly or wholly in specialized computer hardware, such as in custom designed ASICs or FPGAs. The various components and functions of the intermediary system 30 can also be implemented in one or more virtual machines or cloud resources, rather than in dedicated servers. The browser 50 may include executable code stored on any type of non-transitory storage medium, including code for implementing the client-side functions described herein.
In some embodiments, the intermediary system 30 may be omitted. In such embodiments, the browser 50 may be designed or configured to concurrently (1) request/retrieve the actual page from its origin server, and (2) request/retrieve a preview of the page from a separate preview server or system. If the page preview arrives first, the browser may display it while loading the actual page in the background, and then display the actual page in place of the preview once the actual page is fully loaded. The preview server or system in such embodiments may generate and deliver the previews using the same methods as described herein. Preview servers may be set up at a variety of network locations (e.g., points of presence) and geographic locations, in which case they may be statically or dynamically assigned to user devices or page requests according to an algorithm that seeks to minimize response times as seen by users.
Although described in the context of content “pages,” the methods disclosed herein are also applicable to other documents and units of content. For example, the disclosed methods can be used to provide previews of Word documents, spreadsheet files, PDF documents, and various other types of documents.
Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or functions of any of the processes or algorithms described herein can be performed in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left out altogether (e.g., not all described operations or events are necessary for the practice of the algorithm). Moreover, in certain embodiments, operations or events can be performed concurrently, e.g., through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel architectures, rather than sequentially.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, routines and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. The described functionality can be implemented in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the disclosure.
The steps of a method, process, routine, or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module can reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. An exemplary storage medium can be coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium can be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium can reside in an ASIC. The ASIC can reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium can reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment. The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively, in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements, features, acts, operations and so forth. Also, the term “or” is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list.
Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is to be understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y or Z, or a combination thereof. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y and at least one of Z to each be present.
While the above detailed description has shown, described and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments, it can be understood that various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices or algorithms illustrated can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. As can be recognized, certain embodiments of the inventions described herein can be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features can be used or practiced separately from others. The scope of certain inventions disclosed herein is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/726,510 filed on Nov. 14, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5500933 | Schnorf | Mar 1996 | A |
5930472 | Smith | Jul 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982392 | Anfossi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6061715 | Hawes | May 2000 | A |
6230168 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271840 | Finseth et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356908 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6496932 | Trieger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6657647 | Bright | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7051084 | Hayton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7191211 | Tuli | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7296230 | Fukatsu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310769 | Dash | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7356570 | Tuli | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7499051 | O'Donnell | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7917618 | Bettis et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7975019 | Green et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8103742 | Green | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8200896 | Schmieder et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234392 | Graffagnino et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8311900 | Bates et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8314809 | Grabowski et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8331566 | Foote et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8365144 | Webb | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8539338 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8610725 | Sandmel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8732571 | Jain et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8754827 | Braghis et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8769052 | Tidd | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8913067 | Kokkevis | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8913068 | Kokkevis | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8943197 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8990674 | Shibukawa et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9075893 | Jenkins | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9454515 | Jain | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9563928 | Sokolowski et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9563929 | Sokolowski et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9720888 | Jain et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9922007 | Jain et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
20010038395 | Holtzblatt | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032238 | Cronin, III et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020015042 | Robotham | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020078134 | Stone et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020170053 | Peterka et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014478 | Noble | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025716 | Colavin | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046365 | Pfister et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030158916 | Cronin, III et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200507 | Stern et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040095400 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040135784 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186861 | Phatak | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040239681 | Robotham et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050131887 | Rohrabaugh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050232227 | Jorgenson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243097 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256836 | Awamoto et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060031774 | Gaudette | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064467 | Libby | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060277478 | Seraji et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070150820 | Salvo | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156972 | Uehara | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192509 | Ohtsuka et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070234229 | Ohtsuka et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263007 | Robotham et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271288 | Martin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288841 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018658 | Bruno et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034292 | Brunner | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055623 | Piersol et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077862 | Tolpin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120393 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120626 | Graffagnino et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181498 | Swenson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080222273 | Lakshmanan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229025 | Plamondon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235594 | Bhumkar | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080295164 | Steiner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002381 | Harper et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030976 | Shukla | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033986 | Himpe | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089448 | Sze et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100356 | Kujda | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125799 | Kirby | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158134 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158141 | Bauchot et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177996 | Hunt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189890 | Corbett et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228782 | Fraser | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238279 | Tu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090307428 | Schmieder et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307571 | Gowda et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307603 | Gowda et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027663 | Dai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049785 | Stoyanov et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100194753 | Robotham et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100269152 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281402 | Staikos et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029904 | Smith et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110074765 | Oterhals et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078333 | Jakubowski | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078593 | Matsui | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080955 | Shi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110145695 | Matsui | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110197126 | Arastafar | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225520 | Watanabe | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231746 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258532 | Ceze et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110287750 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302514 | Rinaudo et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001832 | Braghis et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022942 | Holloway et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030560 | Yano | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047444 | Adar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054166 | Jeremias | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084663 | Momchilov et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102416 | Chmiel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110435 | Green | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117145 | Clift et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131441 | Jitkoff et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151094 | Cooke | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151308 | Falkenberg | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159308 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120188280 | Charlesbois et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191735 | Duff et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215834 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120254727 | Jain | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254780 | Mouton et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256949 | Treat et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265802 | Shen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130050249 | Grabowski et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080895 | Rossman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130145259 | Kiefer, III et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159923 | French et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185633 | Bunker et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212462 | Athas | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140012685 | Le Chevalier | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032964 | Neerincx | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140053054 | Shen | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059421 | Chibisov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140129920 | Sheretov et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136951 | Kumar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136971 | Kumar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136973 | Kumar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140281894 | Maity et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281896 | Wiitala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150026566 | Hui et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150089355 | Peng et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150117515 | Fu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121193 | Beveridge et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150193409 | Portnoy et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150242522 | Lin et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150271188 | Call | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150293929 | Namgung | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160162597 | Karppanen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170011017 | Jain | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09-204347 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2008-077353 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2011-123697 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-524033 | Aug 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Anonymous, “ShrinkTheWeb (STW) Website Previews Plugin”, http://web.archive.org/web/20120710154658/http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/shrinktheweb-website-preview-plugin/screenshots/, Jul. 10, 2012, 3 pages. |
Anonymous, “ShrinkTheWeb—Website Previews API Documentation”, http://web.archive.org/web/20121029152521/http://www.shrinktheweb.com/uploads/STW_API_Documentation.pdf, Oct. 29, 2012, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/069733, dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
Bahl et al., “Advancing the State of Mobile Cloud Computing”, MCS' 12, Jun. 25, 2012, pp. 21-27. |
Björk et al., “West: A Web Browser for Small Terminals”, CHI Letters, 1999, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 187-196. |
Buyukkokten et al., “Power Browser: Efficient Web Browsing for PDAs”, CHI Letters, 2000, vol. 2, No. 1, Apr. 1-6, 2000, pp. 430-437. |
Deboosere et al., “Thin Client Computing Solutions in Low- and High-Motion Scenarios”, Third International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS'07), 2007, pp. 6. |
Dyken et al., “A Framework for OpenGL Client-Server Rendering”, 2012 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, 2012, pp. 729-734. |
Fox et al., “Experience With Top Gun Wingman: A Proxy-Based Graphical Web Browser for the 3Com PalmPilot”, Middleware'98, Session 9, 1998, pp. 407-424. |
Freytag et al., “Resource Adaptive WWW Access for Mobile Applications”, Computers & Graphics, 1999, vol. 23, pp. 841-848. |
Han et al., “Dynamic Adaptation in an Image Transcoding Proxy for Mobile Web Browsing”, IEEE Personal Communications, Dec. 1998, pp. 8-17. |
Stokes, Jon, “Amazon's Silk is More Than Just a Browser: It's a Cloud OS for the Client”, http://web.archive.org/web/20121217033708/http://www.wired.com/insights/2011/09/amazon-silk, Sep. 28, 2011, pp. 4. |
Tendulkar et al., “Abusing Cloud-Based Browsers for Fun and Profit”, ACSAC '12, Dec. 3-7, 2012, pp. 219-228. |
Wang et al., “Accelerating the Mobile Web with Selective Offloading”, MCC' 13, Aug. 12, 2013, pp. 45-50. |
Zavou et al., “Exploiting Split Browsers for Efficiently Protecting User Data”, CCSW' 12, Oct. 19, 2012, pp. 37-42. |
Esteveo, Martin, “Tiling in DirectX: Part 1”, from gamedev.net, Jul. 24, 2000, 5pgs. |
Esteveo, Martin, “Tiling in OpenGL”, from gamedev.net, Dec. 12, 2000, 6 pgs. |
Kokkevis, Vangelis “GPU Accelerated Compositing in Chrome” The Chromium Projects, 2012, 9 pages. |
PCWorld, Hands-on: Chrome Remote Desktop app for Android makes remote PC access easy, available at http://www.pcworld.com/article/2144562/hands-on-chrome-remote-desktop-app-for-android-makes-remote-access-easy.html, published Apr. 16, 2014 (last accessed May 22, 2014), 4 pages. |
Microsoft Windows Help, Connect to another computer using Remote Desktop Connection, available at http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/connect-using-remote-desktop-connection#connect-using-remote-desktop-connection=windows-7 (last accessed May 22, 2014), 2 pages. |
Delwadia, Vipul, “RemoteME: Experiments in Thin-Client Mobile Computing”, Thesis for Master of Science in Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, 2009, pp. 114. |
Ku et al., “The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, and Reviewed”, http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amazon-kindle-fire-review,3076.html, Nov. 23, 2011, pp. 37. |
Weintraub, Levi, “How WebKit Renders the Web”, Fluent Conference, May 31, 2012, pp. 67. http://www.slideshare.net/naseemh/airbnb-tech-talk. |
Xiao et al., “Browsing on Small Displays by Transforming Web Pages into Hierarchically Structured Subpages”, ACM Transactions on the Web, Jan. 2009, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 36. |
Garsiel et al., “How Browsers Work: Behind the Scenes of Modern Web Browsers”, http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/internals/howbrowserswork/, Aug. 5, 2011, pp. 52. |
Grosskurth et al., “Architecture and Evolution of the Modern Web Browser”, http://grosskurth.ca/papers/browser-archevol-20060619.pdf, Jun. 20, 2006, pp. 24. |
Herostratus' Legacy, “Composited Video Support in WebKitGTK+”, https://blogs.igalia.com/vjaquez/2013/07/26/composited-video-support-in-webkitgtk/, Jul. 26, 2013, pp. 8. |
Stefanov, Stoyan, “Rendering: Repaint, Reflow/Relayout, Restyle”, http://www.phpied.com/rendering-repaint-reflowrelayout-restyle/, Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 11. |
Wiltzius, Tom, “Accelerated Rendering in Chrome”, http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/speed/layers/, Mar. 11, 2013, pp. 11. |
Xiao et al., “Web Page Adaptation for Small Screen Mobile Device: A New P2P Collaborative Deployment Approach”, First International Conference on Intelligent Networks and Intelligent Systems, 2008, pp. 191-196. |
Ranganathan et al., “A Lossless Image Compression Algorithm Using Variable Block Size Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 1995, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 1396-1406. |
Vaisey et al., “Image Compression with Variable Block Size Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Aug. 1992, vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 2040-2060. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140136942 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61726510 | Nov 2012 | US |