The present disclosure generally concerns prosthetic heart valves and associated devices and related methods for implanting such devices. More specifically, the disclosure relates to the repair and replacement of heart valves that have malformations and/or dysfunctions, where an additional dock or anchor is utilized together with the prosthetic heart valve at the implant site, and methods of implanting such anchors and/or prosthetic heart valves.
Referring generally to
When operating properly, the anterior leaflet and the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve function together as a one-way valve to allow blood to flow only from the left atrium to the left ventricle. After the left atrium receives oxygenated blood from the pulmonary veins, the muscles of the left atrium contract and the left ventricle dilates (also referred to as “ventricular diastole” or “diastole”), and the oxygenated blood that is collected in the left atrium flows into the left ventricle. Then, the muscles of the left atrium relax and the muscles of the left ventricle contract (also referred to as “ventricular systole” or “systole”), to move the oxygenated blood out of the left ventricle and through the aortic valve to the rest of the body. The increased blood pressure in the left ventricle during ventricular systole urges the two leaflets of the mitral valve together, thereby closing the one-way mitral valve so that blood cannot flow back into the left atrium. To prevent the two leaflets from prolapsing under the pressure and folding back through the mitral annulus toward the left atrium during ventricular systole, a plurality of fibrous cords called chordae tendineae tether the leaflets to papillary muscles in the left ventricle.
One common form of valvular heart disease is mitral valve leak, also known as mitral regurgitation. Mitral regurgitation occurs when the native mitral valve fails to close properly and blood flows back into the left atrium from the left ventricle during the systolic phase of heart contraction. Mitral regurgitation has different causes, such as leaflet prolapse, dysfunctional papillary muscles, and/or stretching of the mitral valve annulus resulting from dilation of the left ventricle. In addition to mitral regurgitation, mitral narrowing or stenosis is another example of valvular heart disease.
Like the mitral valve, the aortic valve is susceptible to complications such as aortic valve stenosis. One method for treating such valvular heart disease includes the use of a prosthetic valve implanted within the native heart valve. These prosthetic valves can be implanted using a variety of techniques, including various transcatheter techniques. One transcatheter technique that is commonly used for accessing a native valve is the transseptal technique, where a catheter accesses the left side of the heart via a femoral vein, the inferior vena cava, the right atrium, and then a puncture hole in the interatrial septum. A prosthetic valve can then be mounted in a crimped state on the end portion of a second, flexible and/or steerable catheter, advanced to the implantation site, and then expanded to its functional size, for example, by inflating a balloon on which the valve is mounted. Alternatively, a self-expanding prosthetic valve can be retained in a radially compressed state within a sheath of a delivery catheter, and the prosthetic valve can be deployed from the sheath, which allows the prosthetic valve to expand to its functional state.
Another common transcatheter technique for implanting a prosthetic valve is a transventricular approach, where a small incision is made in the chest wall and the ventricular wall of a patient, and then a catheter or introducer sheath is inserted into the left ventricle. A delivery catheter containing or holding the prosthetic valve can then be advanced through the introducer sheath to the implantation site.
Such prosthetic valves are generally better developed for implantation or use at the aortic valve. However, similar catheter-based prosthetic valves can be more difficult to apply or implant at the native mitral valve due to the structural differences between the aortic and mitral valves. For example, the mitral valve has a more complex subvalvular apparatus, which includes the chordae tendineae. Additionally, the native mitral valve is less circular in shape and typically does not provide sufficient structure for anchoring and resisting migration of a prosthetic valve.
Since many valves have already been developed for the aortic position, it would be desirable to try to take advantage of these existing valve technologies and to utilize the same or similar valves for tricuspid, pulmonic and mitral valve replacements. One way of utilizing these preexisting prosthetic valves is to use the prosthetic valves together with an anchor or other docking station that will form a more appropriately shaped implant site at the native valve annulus, so that the prosthetic valve can be implanted more securely, while reducing or eliminating leakage around the valve after implantation. For example, a mitral anchor or docking station can form a more circular bore at the annulus to more closely match the circular profiles of existing aortic valve implants. In this manner, an existing valve implant developed for the aortic position, perhaps with some modification, could then be implanted at the mitral position together with such an anchor. In addition, such anchors could also potentially be used at the heart's other native valves to more securely anchor prosthetic valves at those sites as well.
Described herein are embodiments of prosthetic devices that are primarily intended to be implanted at one of the native mitral, aortic, tricuspid, or pulmonary valve regions of a human heart, as well as apparatuses and methods for implanting the same. The prosthetic devices can be used to repair the native valve annulus, as well as to position and secure a prosthetic heart valve in the native valve region. The disclosed devices can include a helical anchor having a plurality of turns or coils, where the helical anchor can assume an axially collapsed position where portions of at least two of the coils align or overlap in a radial direction.
In one embodiment, a helical device for implanting at a native heart valve of a heart of a patient includes an upper coil and a lower coil, and a central axis extending through the upper coil and the lower coil. The device is configured to assume an axially expanded state where the entire upper coil is positioned on a first side of the lower coil relative to the central axis, and is also configured to assume an axially compressed state where at least a portion of the upper coil is positioned on a second side of at least a portion of the lower coil opposite to the first side relative to the central axis. The device can include a first set of one or more coils comprising the upper coil having a first inner diameter, and a second set of one or more coils comprising the lower coil having an inner diameter different from the first inner diameter.
In certain embodiments, the device can include a first set of coils having at least two coils and a second set of coils having at least two coils. At least one of the coils of the first set of coils is positioned relative to the central axis between two coils of the second set of coils when the device is in the compressed state. The first set of coils can be configured to be positioned on a ventricular side of a native valve, and the second set of coils can be configured to be positioned on an atrial side of the native valve. Preferably, the upper and lower coils are made from a shape-memory material, such a Nitinol.
In another embodiment, a method of implanting a helical device, including an upper coil and a lower coil, at a native valve of a heart of a patient, involves positioning the lower coil on a ventricular side of the native valve, positioning the upper coil on an atrial side of the native valve, such that the entire upper coil is positioned on a first side of the lower coil relative to a central axis of the device, and adjusting the device to a position where at least a portion of the upper coil is positioned on a second side of at least a portion of the lower coil opposite to the first side relative to the central axis.
The method can include implanting a prosthetic heart valve within the device. The prosthetic heart valve is positioned in the device when the prosthetic heart valve is in a radially compressed state, and the prosthetic heart valve is radially expanded such that a radial pressure is applied between the prosthetic heart valve and the device to anchor the prosthetic heart valve within the device
In another embodiment, a system for securing a prosthetic heart valve at a native heart valve of a heart of a patient includes a helical docking device including an upper coil and a lower coil, where a central axis extends through the upper coil and the lower coil, and a prosthetic heart valve configured to be held in the docking device. The docking device is configured to assume an axially expanded state where the entire upper coil is positioned on a first side of the lower coil relative to the central axis, and is also configured to assume an axially compressed state where at least a portion of the upper coil is positioned on a second side of at least a portion of the lower coil opposite to the first side relative to the central axis. The system can include a delivery catheter configured to deploy the docking device at the native heart valve.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description using the accompanying figures. In the drawings:
Described herein are embodiments of prosthetic devices that are primarily intended to be implanted at one of the native mitral, aortic, tricuspid, or pulmonary valve regions of a human heart, as well as apparatuses and methods for implanting the same. The prosthetic devices can be used to repair a native valve and to position and secure a prosthetic heart valve in the native valve region. These prosthetic devices can improve the functionality of the prosthetic heart valves, in order to better repair replace or replicate the functionality of a defective native heart valve. The present disclosure is directed toward all features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, both alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another.
In particular embodiments, a prosthetic assembly includes an anchoring or docking device configured to be implanted at or adjacent the native valve and configured to receive and retain a prosthetic valve. The docking device can be delivered and implanted in a minimally invasive manner via the left ventricle and/or the left atrium, after which a separate prosthetic valve can be delivered and implanted within the docking device in a minimally invasive manner.
In particular embodiments, a docking device includes a helical anchor having a plurality of turns or coils with at least one of the coils having a negative pitch relative to an adjacent coil when the helical anchor is in at least one state, for example, its undeformed or non-tensioned state. As used herein, the “pitch” of a helical anchor is the distance from the center of one coil to the center of an adjacent coil. In a typical helix, the coils extend in a same axial direction, such that each coil can be said to have a positive pitch with respect to a preceding coil in this axial direction. However, if one of the turns or coils doubles over on an outside or an inside of its preceding coil, then it could be said that that particular coil extends in a direction opposite to the positive axial direction, making the pitch of that coil “negative” relative to its preceding coil. Thus, a coil with a “negative pitch” extends along the longitudinal axis of the helical anchor in a direction opposite to the direction of extension of the other coils in the helical anchor. In some embodiments, a helical anchor can be pre-formed with at least one coil having a negative pitch relative to other coils in the anchor when the anchor is in its undeformed or non-tensioned state. In these embodiments, when the helical anchor is held in a tensioned stated, the pitch as measured from a first coil to a second coil extends in a first direction and defines a positive pitch, and when the helical anchor is released from the tensioned state, the second coil can move axially back towards and past the first coil, such that the second coil extends in the opposite direction and defines a negative pitch. As such, the first coil can be disposed at least partially within (i.e., radially inward from) the second coil, or vice versa, in such a non-tensioned state. The anchor can be adjusted to its final position by self-aligning or by being guided or installed by the delivery system.
In the embodiment of
The atrial coils 56a, 56b can have an inner diameter 72 of about 22 mm to about 30 mm, with about 25 mm being a specific example. The ventricular coils can have an inner diameter 74 of about 24 mm to about 32 mm, with about 27 mm being a specific example. The coil wire can have a diameter of about 0.3 mm to about 1.2 mm, with about 1 mm being a specific example. When the docking device 34 is in the axially compressed state (e.g., as seen in
In alternative embodiments, the inner diameter of the atrial coils can be greater than the inner diameter of the ventricular coils (e.g., as seen in
In particular embodiments, the inner diameter of each ventricular coil can be substantially the same, and/or the inner diameter of each atrial coil can be substantially the same. As such, when the docking device 34 moves from the axially expanded state to the axially compressed state, as further described below, the ventricular coils 54a, 54b axially overlap with the atrial coils 56a, 56b in a manner similar to a cylinder within a cylinder.
In other embodiments, the inner diameter of each of the atrial and ventricular coils can vary. For example, an atrial coil can have an inner diameter that is greater than or less than the inner diameter of another atrial coil, and a ventricular coil can have an inner diameter that is greater than or less than the inner diameter of another ventricular coil. In addition, one or more atrial coils can have an inner diameter that is the same as one or more ventricular coils.
In one embodiment, docking device 34 is axially expandable when tension is applied to one or both ends of the docking device 34, and is axially compressible when tension is released from the docking device 34. In this manner, the docking device 34 can be said to be made up of or act similarly to a tension spring.
Meanwhile,
By virtue of the docking device 34 assuming the axially compressed state shown in
Since at least some coils of the docking device 34 axially overlap (similar to a spring within a spring) the docking device can be formed from a relatively thin wire. This is because together, the axially-overlapping coils provide sufficient radial force to securely hold a prosthetic heart valve in place during the dynamic diastolic and systolic phases of heart contraction. Forming the docking device from a relatively thin wire can, for example, make the docking device 34 easier to deliver through a delivery apparatus and can facilitate deployment from the delivery apparatus.
The docking device 34 can be shaped or otherwise formed from a piece of wire, tube, or strip of material that is made from a flexible, elastic, resilient material such as Nitinol, stainless steel, or a polymer that returns to its original shape when released from a deformed or deflected state. Coil flexibility can also, for example, be achieved by using a narrow or thin spring, applying notches to a thin tube, or using a braided material. In some embodiments, the docking device can be loaded into the shaft of a delivery catheter and retained in a substantially straight configuration within the delivery catheter for delivery into the heart of a patient. When formed from a flexible, elastic, resilient material, the docking device 34 can be formed or shape-set (e.g., by heat-shaping a Nitinol wire) in the helical, axially compressed state shown in
As shown, the coil wire of docking device 34 has a generally circular cross-sectional shape. In other embodiments, the coil wire can include various other cross-sectional shapes, such as square, rectangular, elliptical, etc. For example, the coil wires of docking device 300 and docking device 400 (see
It should be noted that a docking device can be formed from one or more helically-shaped pieces of wire, tubes, or strips of material. For example, in some embodiments, the ventricular coils and the atrial coils can be formed from one continuous piece of wire. In other embodiments, the ventricular coils can be formed from a first piece of wire or material, and the atrial coils can be formed from a second, separate piece of wire or material. When the docking device is formed from two or more pieces of wire or material, each piece of the docking device can, for example, be deployed using the same delivery apparatus or using separate delivery apparatuses.
In embodiments discussed above, at least part of a first set of coils becomes nested within a second set of coils, where at least a portion of one or more coils of the second set align or overlap with one or more coils of the first set in a radial direction, for example, by virtue of releasing tension on the docking device and allowing the device to assume a shape-memory state. In other embodiments, a docking device can be configured such that the atrial coils and the ventricular coils do not revert to a nested configuration when tension is released from the docking device. Instead, the docking device can be configured such that a first set of coils are manually moved to an axial position where one or more coils of the second set overlap one or more coils of the first set in the radial direction, such as by application of an axially directed force to one or both ends of the docking device. In these embodiments, the docking device can, for example, be forced into the nested or radially overlapping state by manually applying a force (e.g., an axially compressive force) to the docking device with a delivery apparatus.
As shown in
The guide catheter 16 of the delivery apparatus 10 includes an elongate shaft 25. The shaft 25 has a flexible section 26 extending along a distal portion of the shaft 25, a relatively more rigid section 30 located adjacent and proximal to the flexible section 26, and a lumen 32 that extends the length of the shaft 25.
The flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be positioned in a first, delivery configuration and a second, activated configuration. In the delivery configuration, the flexible section 26 is substantially straight, allowing the flexible section 26 to easily pass through the lumen 22 of the introducer 14 and the mitral valve 42, as shown in
In one embodiment, the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be formed from a flexible, elastic, resilient material such as Nitinol or a polymer that returns to its original shape when released from a deformed or deflected state. When formed from a resilient material, the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be formed or shape-set (e.g., by heat-shaping a Nitinol tube) in the activated configuration (as seen in
Due to its flexible nature, the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be retained in the delivery configuration shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be placed in its activated configuration by one or more actuators or steering mechanisms. For example, the flexible section 26 can be converted from the delivery configuration to the activated configuration using at least one pull wire (see, e.g., pull wire 104 in
In another embodiment, the docking device itself can be used to effect the transition of the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 from the delivery configuration to the activated configuration. Once the guide catheter 16 is advanced into the desired location for the placement of the docking device, the docking device can be advanced through the lumen 32 of the shaft 25. In this alternative embodiment, the relatively more rigid section 30 of the shaft 25 can be configured to resist the spring force exerted by the docking device 34 (which is attempting to return to its undeformed, helical configuration), while the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can be configured to yield under the spring force exerted by the docking device 34. As a result, as the docking device 34 is advanced through the lumen 32 of the shaft 25, the rigid section 30 maintains its shape, while the flexible section 26 is caused to assume its activated configuration under the force of the docking device 34.
In some embodiments, the flexible section 26 and the rigid section 30 can be formed from the same material and/or formed from a single piece of material (e.g., an alloy tube). When formed from the same material and/or from a single piece of material, the shaft can be formed (e.g., laser cut) with a series of slots in selected locations to impart a desired shape and degree of flexibility along certain portions of the flexible section and/or to achieve the curvature of the curved portions 46, 48 when the shaft is in the activated configuration. In other embodiments, the flexible section 26 and the rigid section 30 can be formed from different materials and/or formed from separate pieces of the same material that are fixedly secured or coupled together by an adhesive, welding, fasteners, etc. Materials having varying flexibility can be selected to form different sections of the shaft to achieve the desired degree of flexibility for each section of the shaft.
Also, although not shown, it should be noted that the guide catheter 16 can have multiple radial layers. For example, the delivery catheter 16 can have an inner tube made of Nitinol, stainless steel, plastic, or other suitable material, that is surrounded by a polymeric cover (e.g., PTFE). The delivery catheter 16 can also be formed from an alloy or metal mesh or weave (e.g., braided Nitinol) having an inner and/or outer polymeric liner. The interior of the delivery catheter can be lined with a lubricious material (e.g., PTFE) to allow the other devices to pass more easily through the lumen 32 of the shaft 25.
Referring back to
Although not shown, a standard purse string suture can be used to hold the introducer 14 in place against the heart 12 and to prevent blood leakage around the introducer 14, as well as to seal the opening in the heart 12 upon removal of the introducer 14. As noted above, the introducer 14 can include an internal sealing mechanism (e.g., hemostasis seal) to prevent blood leakage through the lumen 22 of introducer 14.
With the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 in the delivery configuration (i.e., straight or substantially straight), the delivery catheter 16 can then be inserted into the patient's heart 12 by advancing the distal end 28 of the shaft 25 through the lumen 22 of the introducer 14, such that the flexible section 26 extends through the left ventricle 40 and the mitral valve 42 into the left atrium 44 of the heart 12. The flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can then be moved or adjusted to the activated configuration, as described above.
As shown in
With the delivery catheter 16 in the position shown in
With the ventricular coils 54 of the helical docking device 34 positioned under the leaflets 50, 52, the delivery catheter 16 can then be rotated in the direction of arrow 76 in
The atrial coils 56a, 56b can then be fully deployed, for example, by continuing to rotate the delivery catheter 16 in the direction of arrow 76 to further release the docking device 34 from the lumen 32 of the shaft 25.
Fully deploying the docking device 34 from the delivery catheter 16 releases the tension on the docking device 34, allowing the atrial coils 56a, 56b to move axially downward towards the ventricular coils 54a, 54b. The ventricular coils 54a, 54b may also move axially upward towards the atrial coils 56a, 56b. In this manner, the docking device 34 moves toward its axially compressed state, as shown in
By virtue of the axially compressed state of the docking device 34 and by deploying the atrial coils 56a, 56b in the manner described, the docking device 34 can also achieve a relatively high anchoring position (e.g., the second atrial coil 56b can be positioned close to or higher than the annulus of the mitral valve 42). Positioning the docking device at a relatively high position can, for example, help avoid or reduce left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) occlusion, as well as chordae and/or left ventricle damage or leakage due to insufficient leaflet coaptation.
Once the docking device 34 is secured to the native leaflets 50, 52, the delivery catheter 16 can be removed from the patient's heart 12, for example, by straightening the flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 and retracting the delivery catheter 16 through the lumen 22 of the introducer 14. The flexible section 26 of the shaft 25 can, for example, be straightened by advancing a rigid rod through the lumen 32 of the shaft 25 into the flexible section 26, or by adjusting one or more pull wires.
With the delivery catheter 16 removed, a prosthetic valve 36 can then be introduced into the patient's heart 12. As shown in
The prosthetic valve 36 can be introduced into the heart via any known delivery techniques or methods. In the illustrated example, the balloon catheter 64 is inserted through the introducer 14 and into the heart 12 in a transventricular approach. In other embodiments, the balloon catheter can instead be advanced transfemorally (via a femoral artery and the aorta), transeptally (via the superior or inferior vena cava and through the septal wall between the right and left atrium), transatrially (via a surgical opening in the left atrium), or by other methods and/or via other access points.
The balloon catheter 64 is advanced distally through the introducer 14 until the prosthetic valve 36 is positioned within the docking device 34. Once positioning of the prosthetic valve 36 is confirmed, the prosthetic valve 36 is radially expanded to its functional size and secured to the helical docking device 34 by inflating the balloon 66 of the balloon catheter 64. In the case of a self-expanding prosthetic valve, the prosthetic valve is advanced distally out of the distal opening of a sheath of the delivery catheter, or the sheath is retracted, allowing the prosthetic valve to self-expand to its functional size.
The prosthetic valve 36 can be selected to have a nominal outer diameter in its radially expanded state that is slightly larger than the inner diameter of the atrial coils 56a, 56b. As a result, when the prosthetic valve 36 is radially expanded to its functional configuration within the docking device 34, the outer surface of the prosthetic valve 36 is forced radially against the inner diameter of the atrial coils 56a, 56b, thereby radially compressively securing the prosthetic valve within the docking device 34.
As shown in
Once the prosthetic valve 36 is secured within the docking device 34, the balloon catheter 64 can be removed from the patient's heart 12 by deflating the balloon 66 and retracting the catheter 64 from the prosthetic valve 36 and the introducer 14. The introducer 14 can then be removed from the patient's heart 12, and the opening in the patient's heart 12 can be closed.
The delivery apparatus 200 includes an outer catheter 202 and a flexible delivery catheter 204. The outer catheter 202 can have an axially extending shaft 206 and a lumen 208, which extends co-axially through the shaft 206. Through the lumen 208 of the outer catheter 202, various other components (e.g., delivery catheter 204, device 34, etc.) can be introduced into the patient's heart 12.
The delivery catheter 204 of the delivery apparatus 200 forms or includes an elongate shaft 210. The shaft 210 has a flexible section 212 extending along a distal portion of the shaft 210, a relatively more rigid section 214 located adjacent and proximal to the flexible section 212, and a lumen 216 that extends the length of the shaft 210.
The flexible section 212 of the shaft 210 can be positioned or adjusted between a first, delivery configuration and a second, activated configuration. Although not shown, in the delivery configuration, the flexible section 212 is substantially straight, allowing the flexible section 212 to easily pass through the lumen 208 of the outer catheter 202. As best shown in
The shaft 210 can be formed from similar materials and can have a construction similar to shaft 25 described above, to effect transitioning of the shaft from the delivery configuration to the activated configuration.
In the transseptal technique shown in
With the delivery catheter 204 in the delivery configuration, the delivery catheter 204 is then advanced through the lumen 208 of the outer catheter 202, such that distal tip 222 of the delivery catheter 204 is positioned in the left atrium 44. The delivery catheter 204 is then further advanced through the mitral valve 42 and into the left ventricle 40. As shown in
With the delivery catheter 204 in this position, the docking device 34 can be advanced through the lumen 216 such that the first ventricular coil 54a extends from lumen 216 into the left ventricle 40. Due to the flexible and elastic nature of the docking device 34, the docking device 34 can assume a coiled or helical configuration as it exits the lumen 216. For example, as the first ventricular coil 54a is advanced from the lumen 216, the first ventricular coil 54a tracks under the leaflets 50, 52, as best shown in
With the ventricular coils 54 of the helical docking device 34 positioned under the leaflets 50, 52, the delivery catheter 204 can then be retracted upwardly in the direction of arrow 226 back into the left atrium 44 (see, e.g.,
The atrial coils 56a, 56b can then be deployed by further advancing the docking device 34 through the lumen 216, for example, by rotating the delivery catheter 204 in the opposite direction of the direction of extension of the coils.
Fully deploying and releasing the docking device 34 from the delivery catheter 204 releases tension on the docking device 34, allowing the atrial coils 56a, 56b to move axially downward towards the ventricular coils 54a, 54b, where the ventricular coils 54a, 54b may also move axially upward towards the atrial coils 56a, 56b, to move the docking device to the axially compressed state, as shown in
Once the docking device 34 is secured to the native leaflets 50, 52, the delivery catheter 204 can be removed from the patient's heart 12, for example, by straightening the flexible section 212 and retracting the delivery catheter 204 back through the lumen 208 of the outer catheter 202.
With the delivery catheter 204 removed, a prosthetic valve (e.g., prosthetic valve 36) can then be introduced into the patient's heart 12 using known techniques or methods, for example, as described above with respect to
Once the prosthetic valve is secured within the docking device 34, the prosthetic valve delivery apparatus and outer catheter 202 can be removed from the patient's body, and the opening in the patient's septum 94 and right femoral vein can be closed.
Like the embodiment of
By virtue of the docking device 80 assuming the axially compressed state shown in
As best shown in
Due to the conical shape of the coils, the ventricular coils 402a, 402b, 402c and atrial coils 404a, 404b, 404c can axially interlock in a wedge-like manner with the native leaflets 50, 52 captured between the ventricular coils 402a, 402b, 402c and the atrial coils 404a, 404b, 404c, as shown in
As shown in
The flexible section 112 of the shaft 102 also has a second plurality of circumferential slots 120 and a third plurality of circumferential slots 122, which are positioned proximally relative to the first plurality of circumferential slots 116 and the diagonal slots 118. The second plurality of circumferential slots 120 are axially spaced apart and angularly aligned with each other, as best shown in
The shaft 102 can be formed, for example, from a tube. The slots 116, 118, 120, 122 can be formed, for example, by laser cutting the tube. In particular embodiments, the shaft 102 can be formed from an elastically deformable, shape-memory material such as Nitinol.
Due to the manner in which the slots 116, 118, 120, 122 are positioned relative to each other and the widths of the slots, pulling on the proximal end of the pull wire 104 causes the flexible section 112 of the shaft 102 to deform into an activated configuration, as shown in
The slots 118, 122 facilitate bending by reducing the strain on the outer radius of the curved sections 124, 126. The slots 116, 118, 120, 122 can also help avoid kinking of the shaft 102, thereby allowing devices (e.g., a docking device 34) to pass more easily through the lumen 106 of the shaft when the flexible section 112 is in the activated configuration.
Although not shown, the guide catheter 100 can have multiple radial layers. For example, the shaft 102 of the guide catheter 100 can have a polymeric outer cover (e.g., PTFE). The guide catheter 100 can also include an alloy or metal mesh or weave (e.g., braided Nitinol). In addition, the interior of the guide catheter can be lined with a lubricious material (e.g., PTFE) to allow other devices and components to pass more easily through the lumen 106 of the shaft 102.
It should be noted that the devices and apparatuses described herein can be used with other placement techniques (e.g., transatrial, open heart, etc.). It should also be noted that the devices described herein (e.g., the helical docking devices and prosthetic valves) can be used in combination with other delivery systems and methods. For example, additional information regarding devices, delivery systems, and methods can be found in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/088,449 and International Patent Application No. PCT/M2013/000593 (WIPO Publication No. 2013/114214), which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
For purposes of this description, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of the embodiments of this disclosure are described herein. The disclosed methods, apparatuses, and systems should not be construed as limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and nonobvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The methods, apparatuses, and systems are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combination thereof, nor do the disclosed embodiments require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed embodiments are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language. For example, operations described sequentially can in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed methods can be used in conjunction with other methods. Additionally, the description sometimes uses terms like “provide” or “achieve” to describe the disclosed methods. These terms are high-level abstractions of the actual operations that are performed. The actual operations that correspond to these terms can vary depending on the particular implementation and are readily discernible by one of ordinary skill in the art.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosure can be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure. Rather, the scope of the disclosure is defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/974,099, filed May 8, 2018, now granted as U.S. Pat. No. 10,758,341, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/040,772, filed Feb. 10, 2016, now granted as U.S. Pat. No. 10,039,637, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/115,010, filed Feb. 11, 2015, the contents of each of these are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3564617 | Sauvage et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4490859 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4512338 | Balko et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
5282847 | Trescony et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5403305 | Sauter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558644 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607464 | Trescony et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6120534 | Ruiz | Sep 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235042 | Katzman | May 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6406492 | Lytle | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409758 | Stobie et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6419696 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432134 | Anson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6527979 | Constantz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6730121 | Ortiz et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6767362 | Schreck | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797002 | Spence et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878162 | Bales et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6964684 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018408 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7037334 | Hlavka et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7077861 | Spence | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101395 | Tremulis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125421 | Tremulis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166126 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166127 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7276084 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318278 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7431726 | Spence et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462191 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655034 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7737060 | Strickler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780726 | Seguin | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785366 | Maurer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7951195 | Antonsson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959672 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029556 | Rowe | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8128691 | Keranen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8167932 | Bourang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8323335 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8377115 | Thompson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8398708 | Meiri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449605 | Lichtenstein et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449606 | Eliasen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8652203 | Quadri et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657872 | Seguin | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663322 | Keranen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672998 | Lichtenstein et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8734507 | Keranen | May 2014 | B2 |
8795352 | O'Beirne et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8986373 | Chau et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9078747 | Conklin | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095434 | Rowe | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119718 | Keranen | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9237886 | Seguin et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9364326 | Yaron | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9463268 | Spence | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474599 | Keranen | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9622863 | Karapetian et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9867702 | Keränen et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10039637 | Maimon et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10195033 | Tuval et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
11020225 | Keränen et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11039924 | Yaron | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11364114 | Gorman, III et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20020026094 | Roth | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045936 | Moe | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020138135 | Duerig et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173841 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100939 | Yodfat et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030158597 | Quiachon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167089 | Lane | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225420 | Wardle | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040138745 | Macoviak et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167620 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186563 | Lobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096736 | Osse et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119735 | Spence et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137691 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182486 | Gabbay | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203614 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203617 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058872 | Salahieh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010876 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010877 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070185572 | Solem et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203503 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203575 | Forster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265700 | Eliasen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080033542 | Antonsson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080114442 | Mitchell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125853 | Bailey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080208330 | Keranen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228265 | Spence et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275503 | Spence et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090099554 | Forster | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157175 | Benichou | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177278 | Spence | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090259307 | Gross et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276040 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281619 | Le et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319037 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049313 | Alon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076549 | Keidar et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145440 | Keranen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152839 | Shandas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161047 | Cabiri | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168844 | Toomes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198347 | Zakay et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100312333 | Navia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318184 | Spence | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015729 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110098802 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106247 | Miller et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110218621 | Antonsson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224785 | Hacohen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245911 | Quill et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110319990 | Macoviak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016464 | Seguin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120053680 | Bolling et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059458 | Buchbinder et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150287 | Forster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215236 | Matsunaga | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259409 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283820 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310328 | Olson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316643 | Keranen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006352 | Yaron | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023985 | Khairkhahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130190857 | Mitra et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274873 | Delaloye et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304197 | Buchbinder et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310917 | Richter et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310928 | Morriss et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317598 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331929 | Mitra et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074299 | Endou et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088684 | Paskar | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140172070 | Seguin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194981 | Menk et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200661 | Pintor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236287 | Clague et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277417 | Schraut et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277419 | Garde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277424 | Oslund | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140330372 | Weston et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343671 | Yohanan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350667 | Braido et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140379074 | Spence et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150073545 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150073546 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150230921 | Chau et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282931 | Brunnett et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150335428 | Keranen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150374493 | Yaron et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160074165 | Spence et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095705 | Keranen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160184095 | Spence et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199177 | Spence et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160256276 | Yaron | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170007399 | Keranen | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007402 | Zerkowski et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170217385 | Rinkleff et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684644 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1714766 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101588771 | Nov 2009 | CN |
104220027 | Dec 2014 | CN |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19546692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0103546 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0597967 | May 1994 | EP |
0592410 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1432369 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1521550 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1796597 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1296618 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2072027 | Jun 2009 | EP |
1827314 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2620125 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2726018 | May 2014 | EP |
2806829 | Dec 2014 | EP |
3269330 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3395296 | Dec 2019 | EP |
2747708 | Jan 2022 | EP |
2788217 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2815844 | May 2002 | FR |
1271508 | Nov 1986 | SU |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9940964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005034812 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005084595 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006011127 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006111391 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006138173 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2005102015 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007047488 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007067942 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007097983 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008005405 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008015257 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008091515 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009033469 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010121076 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2013110722 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013114214 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015023579 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015023862 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015127264 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015198125 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016038017 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040881 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016130820 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kempfert et al., “Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-ring implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement after failed repair,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2009, 35:965-969. |
Webb et al., “Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprosthetic Heart Valves,” Journal of the American Heart Association, 11, Apr. 27, 2010. |
Webb et al., “Mitral Valve in Valve,” TCT Sep. 2009, Live Case: 30 Minutes, St. Paul's Hospital/University of British Columbia. |
Wenaweser et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Regurgitation in Degenerated Bioprosthesis: The First Valve Procedure Using Corevalve Revalving System,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 70:760-764, 2007. |
Cheung et al,“Transapical Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation in a Human,” The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 2009. |
Cheung et al., Live Case Transmissions, NYHA III CHF, Case Summary, Sep. 23, 2010, St. Paul's Hospital/University of British Columbia. |
Shuto et al., “Percutaneous Transvenous Melody Valve-in-Ring Procedure for Mitral Valve Replacement,” J AM Coll Cardiol, 58(24): 2475-2480, 2011. |
Descoutures et al., “Transcatheter Valve-in-Ring Implantation After Failure of Surgical Mitral Repair,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 44, e8-e15, 2013. |
Weger et al., “First-in-Man Implantation of a Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve in a Mitral Annuloplasty Ring: Novel Treatment Modality for Failed Mitral Valve Repair,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 39, 1054-1056, 2011. |
Walther et al., “Human Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Valve-in-a-Valve Implantation,” Case Reports, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 2008. |
Walther et al., “Valve-in-a-Valve Concept for Transcatheter Minimally Invasive Repeat Xenograph Implantation,” Preclinical Studies, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007. |
Himbert et al., “Transseptal Implantation of a Transcatheter Heart Valve in a Mitral Annuloplasty Ring to Treat Mitral Repair Failure,” Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, American Heart Association, 2011. |
Himbert, Dominique, “Transvenous Mitral Valve Repair Replacement After Failure of Surgical Ring Annuloplasty,” Research Correspondence, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012. |
Casselman et al., “Reducing Operative Morality in Valvular Reoperations: The “valve in ring” Procedure,” Brief Technique Reports, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 141, No. 5. May 2011. |
Ma et al., “Double-Crowned Valved Stents for Off-Pump Mitral Valve Replacement,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 28, 194-199, 2005. |
Bonhoeffer et at., “Percutaneous Replacement of Pulmonary valve in a Right-Ventricle to Pulmonary-Artery Prosthetic Conduit with Valve Dysfunction,” Early Report, The Lancet, vol. 356, Oct. 21, 2000. |
Al-Khaja, et al. “Eleven Years' Experience with Carpentier-Edwards Biological Valves in Relation to Survival and Complications,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, vol. 3. pp. 305-311. 1989. |
Bailey, Percutaneous Expandable Prosthetic Valves, Testbook of Interventional Cardiology, Chapter 75. |
H.R. Andersen “History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis,” Herz No. 34. pp. 343-346. 2009. |
Andersen, H.R., et al. “Transluminal Implantation of Artificial Heart Valve. Description of a New Expandable Aortic Valve and Initial Results with implantation by Catheter Technique in Closed Chest Pig,” European Heart Journal, No. 13. pp. 704-708. 1992. |
D. Pavcnik: Development and Initial Experimental Evaluation of a Prosthetic Aortic Valve for Transcatheter Placement; Cardiovascular Radiology (1992) 183, pp. 151-154. |
Ross, “Aortic Valve Surgery,” At a meeting of the Council on Aug. 4, 1966. pp. 192-197. |
Sabbah, et al. “Mechanical Factors in the Degeneration of Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves: An Overview,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 302-309. 1989. |
Wheatley, “Valve Prostheses,” Operative Surgery, 4th ed. pp. 415-424. 1986. |
Uchida, “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 150. pp. 1185-1187. 1986. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200383777 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62115010 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15040772 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15974099 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15974099 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 17002284 | US |