Delivery of compounds for the treatment of Parkinson's through an inhalation route

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7465436
  • Patent Number
    7,465,436
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 30, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 16, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to the delivery of antiparkinsons drugs through an inhalation route. In a method aspect of the present invention, an antiparkinsons drug is administered to a patient through an inhalation route. The method comprises: a) heating a thin layer of an antiparkinsons drug on a solid support to form a vapor; and, b) passing air through the heated vapor to produce aerosol particles having less than 5% drug degradation products. In a kit aspect of the present invention, a kit for delivering an antiparkinsons drug through an inhalation route is provided which comprises: a) a thin coating of a an antiparkinsons drug composition; and, b) a device for dispending said thin coating as a condensation aerosol.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the delivery of compounds for the treatment of Parkinsons through an inhalation route. Specifically, it relates to aerosols containing antiparkinsonian drugs that are used in inhalation therapy.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There are a number of compositions currently marketed for the treatment of Parkinsons. The compositions contain at least one active ingredient that provides for observed therapeutic effects. Among the active ingredients given in such antiparkinsoniam compositions are benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine and deprenyl.


It is desirable to provide a new route of administration for antiparkinsonian drugs that rapidly produces peak plasma concentrations of the compounds. The provision of such a route is an object of the present invention.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the delivery of compounds for the treatment of Parkinsons through an inhalation route. Specifically, it relates to aerosols containing antiparkinsonian drugs that are used in inhalation therapy.


In a composition aspect of the present invention, the aerosol comprises particles comprising at least 5 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug. Preferably, the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug. More preferably, the particles comprise at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug.


Typically, the aerosol has a mass of at least 10 μg. Preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 100 μg. More preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 0.200 μg.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 10 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 or 0.03 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 90 percent by weight of water. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 80 percent by weight of water. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 70 percent, 60 percent, 50 percent, 40 percent, 30 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent, or 5 percent by weight of water.


Typically, at least 50 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form, wherein crystalline forms make up less than 50 percent by weight of the total aerosol weight, regardless of the nature of individual particles. Preferably, at least 75 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form. More preferably, at least 90 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form.


Typically, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 106 particles/mL. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 107 particles/mL or 108 particles/mL.


Typically, the aerosol particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 microns, e.g., 0.2 to 3 microns. Preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 3 microns. More preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 2 or 1 micron(s).


Typically, the geometric standard deviation around the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol particles is less than 3.0. Preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.5. More preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.3.


Typically, the aerosol is formed by heating a composition containing an antiparkinsonian drug to form a vapor and subsequently allowing the vapor to condense into an aerosol.


In another composition aspect of the present invention, the aerosol comprises particles comprising at least 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl. Preferably, the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl. More preferably, the particles comprise at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl.


Typically, the aerosol has a mass of at least 10 μg. Preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 100 μg. More preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 200 μg.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 10 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 or 0.03 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 90 percent by weight of water. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 80 percent by weight of water. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 70 percent, 60 percent, 50 percent, 40 percent, 30 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent, or 5 percent by weight of water.


Typically, at least 50 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form, wherein crystalline forms make up less than 50 percent by weight of the total aerosol weight, regardless of the nature of individual particles. Preferably, at least 75 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form. More preferably, at least 90 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises benzotropine, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.1 mg/L and 4 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.2 mg/L and 3 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.3 mg/L and 2 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises pergolide, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.01 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.02 mg/L and 1 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.05 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises ropinerole, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.02 mg/L and 4 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.04 mg/L and 2 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.10 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises amantadine, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 5 mg/L and 500 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 10 mg/L and 200 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 20 mg/L and 150 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises deprenyl, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.5 mg/L and 12.5 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 2 mg/L and 7.5 mg/L.


Typically, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 106 particles/mL. Preferably the aerosol has an inhalavle aerosol particle density greater than 107 particles/mL or 108 particles/mL.


Typically, the aerosol particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 microns, e.g., 0.2 to 3 microns. Preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 3 microns. More preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 2 or 1 micron(s).


Typically, the geometric standard deviation around the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol particles is less than 3.0. Preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.5. More preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.3.


Typically, the aerosol is formed by heating a composition containing benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl to form a vapor and subsequently allowing the vapor to condense into an aerosol.


In a method aspect of the present invention, an antiparkinsonian drug is delivered to a mammal through an inhalation route. The method comprises: a) heating a composition, wherein the composition comprises at least 5 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug, to form a vapor; and, b) allowing the vapor to cool, thereby forming a condensation aerosol comprising particles, which is inhaled by the mammal. Preferably, the composition that is heated comprises at least 10 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug. More preferably, the composition comprises at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug.


Typically, the particles comprise at least 5 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug. Preferably, the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug. More preferably, the particles comprise at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug.


Typically, the condensation aerosol has a mass of at least 10 μg. Preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 100 μg. More preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 200μ.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 10 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products. More preferably, the particles comprise 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 or 0.03 percent by weight of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 90 percent by weight of water. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 80 percent by weight of water. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 70 percent, 60 percent, 50 percent, 40 percent, 30 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent, or 5 percent by weight of water.


Typically, at least 50 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form, wherein crystalline forms make up less than 50 percent by weight of the total aerosol weight, regardless of the nature of individual particles. Preferably, at least 75 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form. More preferably, at least 90 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form.


Typically, the particles of the delivered condensation aerosol have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 microns, e.g., 0.2 to 3 microns. Preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 3 microns. More preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 2 or 1 micron(s).


Typically, the geometric standard deviation around the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol particles is less than 3.0. Preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.5. More preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.3.


Typically, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 106 particles/mL. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 107 particles/mL or 108 particles/mL.


Typically, the rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation of the delivered condensation aerosol is greater than 108 particles per second. Preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 109 inhalable particles per second. More preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 1010 inhalable particles per second.


Typically, the delivered condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.5 mg/second. Preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.75 mg/second. More preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 1 mg/second, 1.5 mg/second or 2 mg/second.


Typically, the delivered condensation aerosol results in a peak plasma concentration of an antiparkinsonian drug in the mammal in less than 1 h. Preferably, the peak plasma concentration is reached in less than 0.5 h. More preferably, the peak plasma concentration is reached in less than 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, or 0.005 h (arterial measurement).


In another method aspect of the present invention, one of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl is delivered to a mammal through an inhalation route. The method comprises: a) heating a composition, wherein the composition comprises at least 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl, to form a vapor; and, b) allowing the vapor to cool, thereby forming a condensation aerosol comprising particles, which is inhaled by the mammal. Preferably, the composition that is heated comprises at least 10 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl. More preferably, the composition comprises at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl.


Typically, the particles comprise at least 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl. Preferably, the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl. More preferably, the particles comprise at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl.


Typically, the condensation aerosol has a mass of at least 10 μg. Preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 100 μg. More preferably, the aerosol has a mass of at least 200 μg.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 10 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products. More preferably, the particles comprise 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 or 0.03 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl degradation products.


Typically, the particles comprise less than 90 percent by weight of water. Preferably, the particles comprise less than 80 percent by weight of water. More preferably, the particles comprise less than 70 percent, 60 percent, 50 percent, 40 percent, 30 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent, or 5 percent by weight of water.


Typically, at least 50 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form, wherein crystalline forms make up less than 50 percent by weight of the total aerosol weight, regardless of the nature of individual particles. Preferably, at least 75 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form. More preferably, at least 90 percent by weight of the aerosol is amorphous in form.


Typically, the particles of the delivered condensation aerosol have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 microns, e.g., 0.2 to 3 microns. Preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 3 microns. More preferably, the particles have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 2 or 1 micron(s).


Typically, the geometric standard deviation around the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol particles is less than 3.0. Preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.5. More preferably, the geometric standard deviation is less than 2.3.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises benzotropine, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.1 mg/L and 4 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.2 mg/L and 3 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.3 mg/L and 2 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises pergolide, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.01 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.02 mg/L and 1 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.05 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises ropinerole, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.02 mg/L and 4 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.04 mg/L and 2 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.10 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises amantadine, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 5 mg/L and 500 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 10 mg/L and 200 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 20 mg/L and 150 mg/L.


Typically, where the aerosol comprises deprenyl, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 0.5 mg/L and 12.5 mg/L. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L. More preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol drug mass density of between 2 mg/L and 7.5 mg/L.


Typically, the delivered aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 106 particles/mL. Preferably, the aerosol has an inhalable aerosol particle density greater than 107 particles/mL or 108 particles/mL.


Typically, the rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation of the delivered condensation aerosol is greater than 108 particles per second. Preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 109 inhalable particles per second. More preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 1010 inhalable particles per second.


Typically, the delivered condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.5 mg/second. Preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.75 mg/second. More preferably, the aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 1 mg/second, 1.5 mg/second or 2 mg/second.


Typically, where the condensation aerosol comprises benzotropine, between 0.1 mg and 4 mg of benzotropine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. Preferably, between 0.2 mg and 3 mg of benzotropine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. More preferably, between 0.3 mg and 2 mg of benzotropine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration.


Typically, where the condensation aerosol comprises pergolide, between 0.01 mg and 2.5 mg of pergolide are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. Preferably, between 0.02 mg and 1 mg of pergolide are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. More preferably, between 0.05 mg and 0.5 mg of pergolide are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration.


Typically, where the condensation aerosol comprises ropinerole, between 0.02 mg and 4 mg of ropinerole are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. Preferably, between 0.04 mg and 2 mg of ropinerole are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. More preferably, between 0.1 mg and 1.0 mg of ropinerole are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration.


Typically, where the condensation aerosol comprises amantadine, between 5 mg and 500 mg of amantadine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. Preferably, between 10 mg and 200 mg of amantadine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. More preferably, between 20 mg and 150 mg of amantadine are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration.


Typically, where the condensation aerosol comprises deprenyl, between 0.5 mg and 12.5 mg of deprenyl are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. Preferably, between 1 mg and 10 mg of deprenyl are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration. More preferably, between 2 mg and 7.5 mg of deprenyl are delivered to the mammal in a single inspiration.


Typically, the delivered condensation aerosol results in a peak plasma concentration of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl in the mammal in less than 1 h. Preferably, the peak plasma concentration is reached in less than 0.5 h. More preferably, the peak plasma concentration is reached in less than 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, or 0.005 h (arterial measurement).


In a kit aspect of the present invention, a kit for delivering an antiparkinsonian through an inhalation route to a mammal is provided which comprises: a) a composition comprising at least 5 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug; and, b) a device that forms an antiparkinsonian drug aerosol from the composition, for inhalation by the mammal. Preferably, the composition comprises at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of an antiparkinsonian drug.


Typically, the device contained in the kit comprises: a) an element for heating the antiparkinsonian drug composition to form a vapor; b) an element allowing the vapor to cool to form an aerosol; and, c) an element permitting the mammal to inhale the aerosol.


In another kit aspect of the present invention, a kit for delivering benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl through an inhalation route to a mammal is provided which comprises: a) a composition comprising at least 5 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl; and, b) a device that forms a benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl aerosol from the composition, for inhalation by the mammal. Preferably, the composition comprises at least 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 95 percent, 97 percent, 99 percent, 99.5 percent, 99.9 percent or 99.97 percent by weight of benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl.


Typically, the device contained in the kit comprises: a) an element for heating the benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl composition to form a vapor; b) an element allowing the vapor to cool to form an aerosol; and, c) an element permitting the mammal to inhale the aerosol.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE


FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a device used to deliver antiparkinsonian drug aerosols to a mammal through an inhalation route.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Definitions


“Aerodynamic diameter” of a given particle refers to the diameter of a spherical droplet with a density of 1 g/mL (the density of water) that has the same settling velocity as the given particle.


“Aerosol” refers to a suspension of solid or liquid particles in a gas.


“Aerosol drug mass density” refers to the mass of an antiparkinsonian drug per unit volume of aerosol.


“Aerosol mass density” refers to the mass of particulate matter per unit volume of aerosol.


“Aerosol particle density” refers to the number of particles per unit volume of aerosol.


“Amantadine” refers to tricylo[3.3.1.13,7]decan-1-amine.


“Amantadine degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of amantadine. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis. An example of a degradation product is nitroso-adamantane.


“Amorphous particle” refers to a particle that does not contain more than 50 percent by weight of a crystalline form. Preferably, the particle does not contain more than 25 percent by weight of a crystalline form. More preferably, the particle does not contain more than 10 percent by weight of a crystalline form.


“Antiparkinsonian drug degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of an antiparkinsonian drug. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis.


“Benzotropine” refers to 3-(diphenylmethoxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]-octane.


“Benzotropine degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of benzotropine. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis.


“Condensation aerosol” refers to an aerosol formed by vaporization of a substance followed by condensation of the substance into an aerosol.


“Deprenyl” refers to ®-(−)-N,2-dimethyl-N-2-propynylphenethylamine.


“Deprenyl degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of deprenyl. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis.


“Inhalable aerosol drug mass density” refers to the aerosol drug mass density produced by an inhalation device and delivered into a typical patient tidal volume.


“Inhalable aerosol mass density” refers to the aerosol mass density produced by an inhalation device and delivered into a typical patient tidal volume.


“Inhalable aerosol particle density” refers to the aerosol particle density of particles of size between 100 nm and 5 microns produced by an inhalation device and delivered into a typical patient tidal volume.


“Mass median aerodynamic diameter” or “MMAD” of an aerosol refers to the aerodynamic diameter for which half the particulate mass of the aerosol is contributed by particles with an aerodynamic diameter larger than the MMAD and half by particles with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than the MMAD.


“Pergolide” refers to 8-[(methylthio)methyl]-6-propylergoline.


“Pergolide degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of pergolide. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis. An example of a degradation product is 3-nitrophthalic acid.


“Rate of aerosol formation” refers to the mass of aerosolized particulate matter produced by an inhalation device per unit time.


“Rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation” refers to the number of particles of size between 100 nm and 5 microns produced by an inhalation device per unit time.


“Rate of drug aerosol formation” refers to the mass of aerosolized antiparkinsonian drug produced by an inhalation device per unit time.


“Ropinerole” refers to 4-[2-(dipropylamino)-ethyl]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one.


“Ropinerole degradation product” refers to a compound resulting from a chemical modification of ropinerole. The modification, for example, can be the result of a thermally or photochemically induced reaction. Such reactions include, without limitation, oxidation and hydrolysis.


“Settling velocity” refers to the terminal velocity of an aerosol particle undergoing gravitational settling in air.


“Typical patient tidal volume” refers to 1 L for an adult patient and 15 mL/kg for a pediatric patient.


“Vapor” refers to a gas, and “vapor phase” refers to a gas phase. The term “thermal vapor” refers to a vapor phase, aerosol, or mixture of aerosol-vapor phases, formed preferably by heating.


Formation of Antiparkinsonian Drug Containing Aerosols


Any suitable method is used to form the aerosols of the present invention. A preferred method, however, involves heating a composition comprising an antiparkinsonian drug to form a vapor, followed by cooling of the vapor such that it condenses to provide an antiparkinsonian drug comprising aerosol (condensation aerosol). The composition is heated in one of four forms: as pure active compound (e.g., pure benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl); as a mixture of active compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient; as a salt form of the pure active compound; and, as a mixture of active compound salt form and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.


Salt forms of antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine or deprenyl) are either commercially available or are obtained from the corresponding free base using well known methods in the art. A variety of pharmaceutically acceptable salts are suitable for aerosolization. Such salts include, without limitation, the following: hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, acetic acid, maleic acid, formic acid, and fumaric acid salts.


Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients may be volatile or nonvolatile. Volatile excipients, when heated, are concurrently volatilized, aerosolized and inhaled with the antiparkinsonian drug. Classes of such excipients are known in the art and include, without limitation, gaseous, supercritical fluid, liquid and solid solvents. The following is a list of exemplary carriers within the classes: water; terpenes, such as menthol; alcohols, such as ethanol, propylene glycol, glycerol and other similar alcohols; dimethylformamide; dimethylacetamide; wax; supercritical carbon dioxide; dry ice; and mixtures thereof.


Solid supports on which the composition is heated are of a variety of shapes. Examples of such shapes include, without limitation, cylinders of less than 1.0 mm in diameter, boxes of less than 1.0 mm thickness and virtually any shape permeated by small (e.g., less than 1.0 mm-sized) pores. Preferably, solid supports provide a large surface to volume ratio (e.g., greater than 100 per meter) and a large surface to mass ratio (e.g., greater than 1 cm2 per gram).


A solid support of one shape can also be transformed into another shape with different properties. For example, a flat sheet of 0.25 mm thickness has a surface to volume ratio of approximately 8,000 per meter. Rolling the sheet into a hollow cylinder of 1 cm diameter produces a support that retains the high surface to mass ratio of the original sheet but has a lower surface to volume ratio (about 400 per meter).


A number of different materials are used to construct the solid supports. Classes of such materials include, without limitation, metals, inorganic materials, carbonaceous materials and polymers. The following are examples of the material classes: aluminum, silver, gold, stainless steel, copper and tungsten; silica, glass, silicon and alumina; graphite, porous carbons, carbon yarns and carbon felts; polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene glycol. Combinations of materials and coated variants of materials are used as well.


Where aluminum is used as a solid support, aluminum foil is a suitable material. Examples of silica, alumina and silicon based materials include amphorous silica S-5631 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), BCR 171 (an alumina of defined surface area greater than 2 m2/g from Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) and a silicon wafer as used in the semiconductor industry. Carbon yarns and felts are available from American Kynol, Inc., New York, N.Y. Chromatography resins such as octadecycl silane chemically bonded to porous silica are exemplary coated variants of silica.


The heating of the antiparkinsonian drug compositions is performed using any suitable method. Examples of methods by which heat can be generated include the following: passage of current through an electrical resistance element; absorption of electromagnetic radiation, such as microwave or laser light; and, exothermic chemical reactions, such as exothermic solution, hydration of pyrophoric materials and oxidation of combustible materials.


Delivery of Antiparkinsonian Drug Containing Aerosols


Antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosols of the present invention are delivered to a mammal using an inhalation device. Where the aerosol is a condensation aerosol, the device has at least three elements: an element for heating an antiparkinsonian drug containing composition to form a vapor; an element allowing the vapor to cool, thereby providing a condensation aerosol; and, an element permitting the mammal to inhale the aerosol. Various suitable heating methods are described above. The element that allows cooling is, in it simplest form, an inert passageway linking the heating means to the inhalation means. The element permitting inhalation is an aerosol exit portal that forms a connection between the cooling element and the mammal's respiratory system.


One device used to deliver the antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosol is described in reference to FIG. 1. Delivery device 100 has a proximal end 102 and a distal end 104, a heating module 106, a power source 108, and a mouthpiece 110. An antiparkinsonian drug composition is deposited on a surface 112 of heating module 106. Upon activation of a user activated switch 114, power source 108 initiates heating of heating module 106 (e.g, through ignition of combustible fuel or passage of current through a resistive heating element). The antiparkinsonian drug composition volatilizes due to the heating of heating module 106 and condenses to form a condensation aerosol prior to reaching the mouthpiece 110 at the proximal end of the device 102. Air flow traveling from the device distal end 104 to the mouthpiece 110 carries the condensation aerosol to the mouthpiece 110, where it is inhaled by the mammal.


Devices, if desired, contain a variety of components to facilitate the delivery of antiparkinsonian containing aerosols. For instance, the device may include any component known in the art to control the timing of drug aerosolization relative to inhalation (e.g., breath-actuation), to provide feedback to patients on the rate and/or volume of inhalation, to prevent excessive use (i.e., “lock-out” feature), to prevent use by unauthorized individuals, and/or to record dosing histories.


Dosage of Antiparkinsonian Drug Containing Aerosols


The dosage amount of antiparkinsonian drugs in aerosol form is generally no greater than twice the standard dose of the drug given orally. For instance, benzotropine, pergolide, ropinerole, amantadine and deprenyl are given orally at strengths of 0.5 mg to 2 mg, 0.05 mg to 1.0 mg, 0.25 mg to 4 mg, 50 mg to 100 mg, and 5 mg respectively for the treatment of Parkinsons. As aerosols, 0.1 mg to 4 mg of benztropine, 0.01 mg to 2.5 mg of pergolide, 0.02 mg to 4 mg of ropinerole, 5 mg to 250 mg of amantadine, and 0.5 mg to 12.5 mg of deprenyl are generally provided per inspiration for the same indication. A typical dosage of an antiparkinsonian drug aerosol is either administered as a single inhalation or as a series of inhalations taken within an hour or less (dosage equals sum of inhaled amounts). Where the drug is administered as a series of inhalations, a different amount may be delivered in each inhalation.


One can determine the appropriate dose of antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosols to treat a particular condition using methods such as animal experiments and a dose-finding (Phase I/II) clinical trial. One animal experiment involves measuring plasma concentrations of drug in an animal after its exposure to the aerosol. Mammals such as dogs or primates are typically used in such studies, since their respiratory systems are similar to that of a human. Initial dose levels for testing in humans is generally less than or equal to the dose in the mammal model that resulted in plasma drug levels associated with a therapeutic effect in humans. Dose escalation in humans is then performed, until either an optimal therapeutic response is obtained or a dose-limiting toxicity is encountered.


Analysis of Antiparkinsonian Drug Containing Aerosols


Purity of an antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosol is determined using a number of methods, examples of which are described in Sekine et al., Journal of Forensic Science 32:1271-1280 (1987) and Martin et al., Journal of Analytic Toxicology 13:158-162 (1989). One method involves forming the aerosol in a device through which a gas flow (e.g., air flow) is maintained, generally at a rate between 0.4 and 60 L/min. The gas flow carries the aerosol into one or more traps. After isolation from the trap, the aerosol is subjected to an analytical technique, such as gas or liquid chromatography, that permits a determination of composition purity.


A variety of different traps are used for aerosol collection. The following list contains examples of such traps: filters; glass wool; impingers; solvent traps, such as dry ice-cooled ethanol, methanol, acetone and dichloromethane traps at various pH values; syringes that sample the aerosol; empty, low-pressure (e.g., vacuum) containers into which the aerosol is drawn; and, empty containers that fully surround and enclose the aerosol generating device. Where a solid such as glass wool is used, it is typically extracted with a solvent such as ethanol. The solvent extract is subjected to analysis rather than the solid (i.e., glass wool) itself. Where a syringe or container is used, the container is similarly extracted with a solvent.


The gas or liquid chromatograph discussed above contains a detection system (i.e., detector). Such detection systems are well known in the art and include, for example, flame ionization, photon absorption and mass spectrometry detectors. An advantage of a mass spectrometry detector is that it can be used to determine the structure of antiparkinsonian drug degradation products.


Particle size distribution of an antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosol is determined using any suitable method in the art (e.g., cascade impaction). An Andersen Eight Stage Non-viable Cascade Impactor (Andersen Instruments, Smyrna, Ga.) linked to a furnace tube by a mock throat (USP throat, Andersen Instruments, Smyrna, Ga.) is one system used for cascade impaction studies.


Inhalable aerosol mass density is determined, for example, by delivering a drug-containing aerosol into a confined chamber via an inhalation device and measuring the mass collected in the chamber. Typically, the aerosol is drawn into the chamber by having a pressure gradient between the device and the chamber, wherein the chamber is at lower pressure than the device. The volume of the chamber should approximate the tidal volume of an inhaling patient.


Inhalable aerosol drug mass density is determined, for example, by delivering a drug-containing aerosol into a confined chamber via an inhalation device and measuring the amount of active drug compound collected in the chamber. Typically, the aerosol is drawn into the chamber by having a pressure gradient between the device and the chamber, wherein the chamber is at lower pressure than the device. The volume of the chamber should approximate the tidal volume of an inhaling patient. The amount of active drug compound collected in the chamber is determined by extracting the chamber, conducting chromatographic analysis of the extract and comparing the results of the chromatographic analysis to those of a standard containing known amounts of drug.


Inhalable aerosol particle density is determined, for example, by delivering aerosol phase drug into a confined chamber via an inhalation device and measuring the number of particles of given size collected in the chamber. The number of particles of a given size may be directly measured based on the light-scattering properties of the particles. Alternatively, the number of particles of a given size is determined by measuring the mass of particles within the given size range and calculating the number of particles based on the mass as follows: Total number of particles=Sum (from size range 1 to size range N) of number of particles in each size range. Number of particles in a given size range=Mass in the size range/Mass of a typical particle in the size range. Mass of a typical particle in a given size range=π*D3*φ/6, where D is a typical particle diameter in the size range (generally, the mean boundary MMADs defining the size range) in microns, φ is the particle density (in g/mL) and mass is given in units of picograms (g−12).


Rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation is determined, for example, by delivering aerosol phase drug into a confined chamber via an inhalation device. The delivery is for a set period of time (e.g., 3 s), and the number of particles of a given size collected in the chamber is determined as outlined above. The rate of particle formation is equal to the number of 100 nm to 5 micron particles collected divided by the duration of the collection time.


Rate of aerosol formation is determined, for example, by delivering aerosol phase drug into a confined chamber via an inhalation device. The delivery is for a set period of time (e.g., 3 s), and the mass of particulate matter collected is determined by weighing the confined chamber before and after the delivery of the particulate matter. The rate of aerosol formation is equal to the increase in mass in the chamber divided by the duration of the collection time. Alternatively, where a change in mass of the delivery device or component thereof can only occur through release of the aerosol phase particulate matter, the mass of particulate matter may be equated with the mass lost from the device or component during the delivery of the aerosol. In this case, the rate of aerosol formation is equal to the decrease in mass of the device or component during the delivery event divided by the duration of the delivery event.


Rate of drug aerosol formation is determined, for example, by delivering an antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosol into a confined chamber via an inhalation device over a set period of time (e.g., 3 s). Where the aerosol is pure antiparkinsonian drug, the amount of drug collected in the chamber is measured as described above. The rate of drug aerosol formation is equal to the amount of antiparkinsonian drug collected in the chamber divided by the duration of the collection time. Where the antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosol comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, multiplying the rate of aerosol formation by the percentage of antiparkinsonian drug in the aerosol provides the rate of drug aerosol formation.


Utility of Antiparkinsonian Drug Containing Aerosols


The antiparkinsonian drug containing aerosols of the present invention are typically used for the treatment of Parkinsons.


The following examples are meant to illustrate, rather than limit, the present invention.


Benztropine mesylate, pergolide mesylate and amantadine were purchased from Sigma (www.sigma-aldrich.com). Deprenyl hydrochloride was purchased from Sigma RBI (www.sigma-aldrich.com). Ropinerole hydrochloride was purchased as REQUIP® tablets from a pharmacy. Other antiparkinsonian drugs can be similarly obtained.


EXAMPLE 1
General Procedure for Obtaining Free Base of a Compound Salt

Approximately 1 g of salt (e.g., mono hydrochloride) is dissolved in deionized water (˜30 mL). Three equivalents of sodium hydroxide (1 N NaOHaq) is added dropwise to the solution, and the pH is checked to ensure it is basic. The aqueous solution is extracted four times with dichloromethane (˜50 mL), and the extracts are combined, dried (Na2SO4) and filtered. The filtered organic solution is concentrated using a rotary evaporator to provide the desired free base. If necessary, purification of the free base is performed using standard methods such as chromatography or recrystallization.


EXAMPLE 2
General Procedure for Volatilizing Compounds from Halogen Bulb

A solution of drug in approximately 120 μL dichloromethane is coated on a 3.5 cm×7.5 cm piece of aluminum foil (precleaned with acetone). The dichloromethane is allowed to evaporate. The coated foil is wrapped around a 300 watt halogen tube (Feit Electric Company, Pico Rivera, Calif.), which is inserted into a glass tube sealed at one end with a rubber stopper. Running 90 V of alternating current (driven by line power controlled by a variac) through the bulb for 3.5 s (drug coating of 0.01 mg to 8 mg) or for 5 s (drug coating>8 mg) affords thermal vapor (including aerosol), which is collected on the glass tube walls. Reverse-phase HPLC analysis with detection by absorption of 225 nm light is used to determine the purity of the aerosol. (When desired, the system is flushed through with argon prior to volatilization.) To obtain higher purity aerosols, one can coat a lesser amount of drug, yielding a thinner film to heat. A linear decrease in film thickness is associated with a linear decrease in impurities.


Table 1, which follows, provides data from drugs volatilized using the above-recited general procedure.













TABLE 1








Aerosol
Argon



Compound
Purity
Used









Benztropine
98.3% 
No




99.5% 
Yes



Pergolide
  98%
No




  98%
Yes



Ropinerole
>90%
Yes



Amantadine
100%
No




100%
Yes



Deprenyl
100%
No




  97%
Yes










EXAMPLE 3
Particle Size, Particle Density, and Rate of Inhalable Particle Formation of Pergolide Aerosol

A solution of 1.3 mg pergolide in 100 μL dichloromethane was spread out in a thin layer on the central portion of a 3.5 cm×7 cm sheet of aluminum foil. The dichloromethane was allowed to evaporate. The aluminum foil was wrapped around a 300 watt halogen tube, which was inserted into a T-shaped glass tube. Both of the openings of the tube were left open and the third opening was connected to a 1 liter, 3-neck glass flask. The glass flask was further connected to a large piston capable of drawing 1.1 liters of air through the flask. Alternating current was run through the halogen bulb by application of 90 V using a variac connected to 110 V line power. Within 1 s, an aerosol appeared and was drawn into the 1 L flask by use of the piston, with collection of the aerosol terminated after 6 s. The aerosol was analyzed by connecting the 1 L flask to an eight-stage Andersen non-viable cascade impactor. Results are shown in table 1. MMAD of the collected aerosol was 1.8 microns with a geometric standard deviation of 2.2. Also shown in table 1 is the number of particles collected on the various stages of the cascade impactor, given by the mass collected on the stage divided by the mass of a typical particle trapped on that stage. The mass of a single particle of diameter D is given by the volume of the particle, πD3/6, multiplied by the density of the drug (taken to be 1 g/cm3). The inhalable aerosol particle density is the sum of the numbers of particles collected on impactor stages 3 to 8 divided by the collection volume of 1 L, giving an inhalable aerosol particle density of 6.7×106 particles/mL. The rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation is the sum of the numbers of particles collected on impactor stages 3 through 8 divided by the formation time of 6 s, giving a rate of inhalable aerosol particle formation of 1.1×109 particles/second.


Table 1: Determination of the characteristics of a pergolide condensation aerosol by cascade impaction using an Andersen 8-stage non-viable cascade impactor run at 1 cubic foot per minute air flow.

















Particle
Average





size
particle
Mass



range
size
collected
Number of


Stage
(microns)
(microns)
(mg)
particles



















0
 9.0-10.0
9.5
0.01
1.3 × 104


1
5.8-9.0
7.4
0.02
7.5 × 104


2
4.7-5.8
5.25
0.03
3.6 × 105


3
3.3-4.7
4.0
0.06
1.9 × 106


4
2.1-3.3
2.7
0.10
9.8 × 106


5
1.1-2.1
1.6
0.19
8.8 × 107


6
0.7-1.1
0.9
0.09
2.5 × 108


7
0.4-0.7
0.55
0.04
4.0 × 108


8
  0-0.4
0.2
0.03
6.0 × 109









EXAMPLE 4
Drug Mass Density and Rate of Drug Aerosol Formation of Pergolide Aerosol

A solution of 1.0 mg pergolide in 100 μL dichloromethane was spread out in a thin layer on the central portion of a 3.5 cm×7 cm sheet of aluminum foil. The dichloromethane was allowed to evaporate. The aluminum foil was wrapped around a 300 watt halogen tube, which was inserted into a T-shaped glass tube. Both of the openings of the tube were left open and the third opening was connected to a 1 liter, 3-neck glass flask. The glass flask was further connected to a large piston capable of drawing 1.1 liters of air through the flask. Alternating current was run through the halogen bulb by application of 90 V using a variac connected to 110 V line power. Within seconds, an aerosol appeared and was drawn into the 1 L flask by use of the piston, with formation of the aerosol terminated after 6 s. The aerosol was allowed to sediment onto the walls of the 1 L flask for approximately 30 minutes. The flask was then extracted with acetonitrile and the extract analyzed by HPLC with detection by light absorption at 225 nm. Comparison with standards containing known amounts of pergolide revealed that 0.3 mg of >99% pure pergolide had been collected in the flask, resulting in an aerosol drug mass density of 0.3 mg/L. The aluminum foil upon which the pergolide had previously been coated was weighed following the experiment. Of the 1.0 mg originally coated on the aluminum, 1.0 mg of the material was found to have aerosolized in the 6 s time period, implying a rate of drug aerosol formation of 0.2 mg/s.

Claims
  • 1. A condensation aerosol for delivery of benzotropine formed by heating a composition containing benzotropine coated on a solid support to form a vapor and condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles, wherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of benzotropine and less than 5 percent by weight of benzotropine degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 2. The condensation aerosol according to claim 1, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 3. The condensation aerosol according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the geometric standard deviation around the MMAD is less than 3.0.
  • 4. A condensation aerosol for delivery of pergolide formed by heating a composition containing pergolide coated on a solid support to form a vapor and condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles, wherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of pergolide and less than 5 percent by weight of pergolide degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 5. The condensation aerosol according to claim 4, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 6. The condensation aerosol according to claim 4 or claim 5, wherein the geometric standard deviation around the MMAD is less than 3.0.
  • 7. A condensation aerosol for delivery of amantadine formed by heating a composition containing amantadine coated on a solid support to form a vapor and condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles, wherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of amantadine and less than 5 percent by weight of amantadine degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 8. The condensation aerosol according to claim 7, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 9. The condensation aerosol according to claim 7 or claim 8, wherein the geometric standard deviation around the MMAD is less than 3.0.
  • 10. A condensation aerosol for delivery of deprenyl formed by heating a composition containing deprenyl coated on a solid support to form a vapor and condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles, wherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of deprenyl and less than 5 percent by weight of deprenyl degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 11. The condensation aerosol according to claim 10, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 12. The condensation aerosol according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the geometric standard deviation around the MMAD is less than 3.0.
  • 13. A condensation aerosol for delivery of ropinerole formed by heating a composition containing ropinerole coated on a solid support to form a vapor and condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles, wherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of ropinerole and less than 5 percent by weight of ropinerole degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 14. The condensation aerosol according to claim 13, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 15. The condensation aerosol according to claim 13 or claim 14, wherein the geometric standard deviation around the MMAD is less than 3.0.
  • 16. A method of forming a benzotropine containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing benzotropine coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of benzotropine degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of benzotropine.
  • 19. A method of forming a pergolide containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing pergolide coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of pergolide degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 21. The method according to claim 20, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of pergolide.
  • 22. A method of forming an amantadine containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing amantadine coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of amantadine degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 23. The method according to claim 22, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 24. The method according to claim 23, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of amantadine.
  • 25. A method of forming a deprenyl containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing deprenyl coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of deprenyl degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 26. The method according to claim 25, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 27. The method according to claim 26, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of deprenyl.
  • 28. A method of forming a ropinerole containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing ropinerole coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the particles comprise less than 5 percent by weight of ropinerole degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 29. The method according to claim 28, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 30. The method according to claim 29, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of ropinerole.
  • 31. A method of forming a drug containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing the drug and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the drug is selected from the group consisting of benzotropine, pergolide, amantadine, deprenyl, and ropinerole, andwherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of the drug and less than 5 percent by weight of the drug degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 32. The method according to claim 31, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 33. The method according to claim 32, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of the drug.
  • 34. A method of forming a drug containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing a salt form of the drug coated on a solid support to form a vapor; and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the drug is selected from the group consisting of benzotropine, pergolide, amantadine, deprenyl, and ropinerole, andwherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of the drug and less than 5 percent by weight of the drug degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 35. The method according to claim 34, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 36. The method according to claim 35, wherein the coated composition comprises at least 10 percent by weight of the salt form of the drug.
  • 37. The condensation aerosol according to claim 2, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 38. The condensation aerosol according to claim 5, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 39. The condensation aerosol according to claim 8, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 40. The condensation aerosol according to claim 11, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 41. The condensation aerosol according to claim 14, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 42. The method according to claim 17, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 43. The method according to claim 20, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 44. The method according to claim 23, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 45. The method according to claim 26, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 46. The method according to claim 29, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 47. The method according to claim 32, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 48. The method according to claim 35, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
  • 49. A method of forming a drug containing aerosol comprising: (a) heating a composition containing the drug coated on a solid support to form a vapor, and(b) condensing the vapor to form a condensation aerosol comprising particles,wherein the drug is selected from the group consisting of benzotropine, pergolide, amantadine, deprenyl, and ropinerole,wherein the condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.5 mg/second, andwherein the particles comprise at least 10 percent by weight of the drug and less than 5 percent by weight of the drug degradation products, and the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of less than 5 microns.
  • 50. The method according to claim 49, wherein the condensation aerosol has an MMAD of 0.2 to 3 microns.
  • 51. The method according to claim 50, wherein the condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 0.75 mg/second.
  • 52. The method according to claim 51, wherein the condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 1 mg/second.
  • 53. The method according to claim 52, wherein the condensation aerosol is formed at a rate greater than 2 mg/second.
  • 54. The method according to claim 49, wherein the condensing comprises allowing the vapor to cool.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/816,567, filed Apr. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,052,680; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/153,139, filed May 20, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,954; which claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/294,203 entitled “Thermal Vapor Delivery of Drugs,” filed May 24, 2001, Rabinowitz and Zaffaroni, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application further claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/317,479 entitled “Aerosol Drug Delivery,” filed Sep. 5, 2001, Rabinowitz and Zaffaroni, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (208)
Number Name Date Kind
3219533 Mullins Nov 1965 A
3560607 Hartley et al. Feb 1971 A
3949743 Shanbrom Apr 1976 A
3982095 Robinson Sep 1976 A
4141369 Burruss Feb 1979 A
RE30285 Babington May 1980 E
4303083 Burruss, Jr. Dec 1981 A
4474191 Steiner Oct 1984 A
4484576 Albarda Nov 1984 A
4566451 Badewien Jan 1986 A
4708151 Shelar Nov 1987 A
4734560 Bowen Mar 1988 A
4735217 Gerth et al. Apr 1988 A
4819665 Roberts et al. Apr 1989 A
4848374 Chard et al. Jul 1989 A
4853517 Bowen et al. Aug 1989 A
4895719 Radhakrishnan et al. Jan 1990 A
4906417 Gentry Mar 1990 A
4917119 Potter et al. Apr 1990 A
4924883 Perfetti et al. May 1990 A
4941483 Ridings et al. Jul 1990 A
4963289 Ortiz et al. Oct 1990 A
5042509 Banerjee et al. Aug 1991 A
5049389 Radhakrishnan Sep 1991 A
5060671 Counts et al. Oct 1991 A
5099861 Clearman et al. Mar 1992 A
5135009 Muller et al. Aug 1992 A
5144962 Counts et al. Sep 1992 A
5146915 Montgomery Sep 1992 A
5224498 Deevi et al. Jul 1993 A
5345951 Serrano et al. Sep 1994 A
5366770 Wang Nov 1994 A
5388574 Ingebrethsen Feb 1995 A
5456247 Shilling et al. Oct 1995 A
5511726 Greenspan et al. Apr 1996 A
5544646 Lloyd et al. Aug 1996 A
5564442 MacDonald et al. Oct 1996 A
5592934 Thwaites Jan 1997 A
5605146 Sarela Feb 1997 A
5649554 Sprinkel Jul 1997 A
5655523 Hodson et al. Aug 1997 A
5666977 Higgins et al. Sep 1997 A
5694919 Rubsamen et al. Dec 1997 A
5735263 Rubsamen et al. Apr 1998 A
5738865 Baichwal et al. Apr 1998 A
5743251 Howell et al. Apr 1998 A
5758637 Ivri et al. Jun 1998 A
5819756 Mielordt Oct 1998 A
5840246 Hammons et al. Nov 1998 A
5855913 Hanes et al. Jan 1999 A
5874481 Weers et al. Feb 1999 A
5894841 Voges Apr 1999 A
5915378 Lloyd et al. Jun 1999 A
5918595 Olsson Jul 1999 A
5934272 Lloyd et al. Aug 1999 A
5957124 Lloyd et al. Sep 1999 A
5960792 Lloyd et al. Oct 1999 A
5993805 Sutton et al. Nov 1999 A
6041777 Faithfull et al. Mar 2000 A
6051566 Bianco Apr 2000 A
6090212 Mahawili Jul 2000 A
6095134 Sievers et al. Aug 2000 A
6095153 Kessler et al. Aug 2000 A
6102036 Slutsky et al. Aug 2000 A
6131570 Schuster et al. Oct 2000 A
6136295 Edwards et al. Oct 2000 A
6155268 Takeuchi Dec 2000 A
6158431 Poole Dec 2000 A
6234167 Cox et al. May 2001 B1
6241969 Saidi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255334 Sands Jul 2001 B1
6313176 Ellinwood, Jr. et al. Nov 2001 B1
6506762 Horvath et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514482 Bartus et al. Feb 2003 B1
6591839 Meyer et al. Jul 2003 B2
6632047 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 B2
6682716 Hodges et al. Jan 2004 B2
6701922 Hindle et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716415 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2004 B2
6716416 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2004 B2
6716417 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2004 B2
6737042 Rabinowitz et al. May 2004 B2
6737043 Rabinowitz et al. May 2004 B2
6740307 Rabinowitz et al. May 2004 B2
6740308 Rabinowitz et al. May 2004 B2
6740309 Rabinowitz et al. May 2004 B2
6743415 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759029 Hale et al. Jul 2004 B2
6772756 Shayan Aug 2004 B2
6776978 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780399 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780400 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783753 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2004 B2
6797259 Rabinowitz et al. Sep 2004 B2
6803031 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805853 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805854 Hale et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814954 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2004 B2
6814955 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2004 B2
6855310 Rabinowitz et al. Feb 2005 B2
6884408 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2005 B2
6994843 Rabinowitz et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005121 Rabinowitz et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005122 Hale et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008615 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7008616 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011819 Hale et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011820 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014840 Hale et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014841 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018619 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018620 Rabinowitz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018621 Hale et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022312 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2006 B2
7029658 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033575 Rabinowitz et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045118 Rabinowitz et al. May 2006 B2
7045119 Rabinowitz et al. May 2006 B2
7048909 Rabinowitz et al. May 2006 B2
7052679 Rabinowitz et al. May 2006 B2
7052680 Rabinowitz et al. May 2006 B2
7060254 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060255 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063830 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063831 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063832 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7067114 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7070761 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070762 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070763 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070764 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070765 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070766 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078016 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078017 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078018 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078019 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078020 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087216 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087217 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087218 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090830 Hale et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094392 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7108847 Rabinowitz et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115250 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2006 B2
7169378 Rabinowitz et al. Jan 2007 B2
20010020147 Staniforth et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020037828 Wilson et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020058009 Bartus et al. May 2002 A1
20020086852 Cantor Jul 2002 A1
20020112723 Schuster et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020117175 Kottayil et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020176841 Barker et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030004142 Prior et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015196 Hodges et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015197 Hale et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032638 Kim et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030051728 Lloyd et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030062042 Wensley et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030118512 Shen Jun 2003 A1
20030131843 Lu Jul 2003 A1
20030138508 Novack et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030209240 Hale et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040009128 Rabinowitz et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040016427 Byron et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040096402 Hodges et al. May 2004 A1
20040099266 Cross et al. May 2004 A1
20040101481 Hale et al. May 2004 A1
20040102434 Hale et al. May 2004 A1
20040105818 Every et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040105819 Hale et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040234699 Hale et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040234914 Hale et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040234916 Hale et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050034723 Bennett et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037506 Hale et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050079166 Damani et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050126562 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131739 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050258159 Hale et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268911 Cross et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060032496 Hale et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060032501 Hale et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060120962 Rabinowitz et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153779 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177382 Rabinowitz et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193788 Hale et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060216243 Rabinowitz et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233717 Hale et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233718 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233719 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239936 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246011 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060246012 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251587 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251588 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257328 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257329 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269486 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269487 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060280692 Rabinowitz et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060286042 Rabinowitz et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060286043 Rabinowitz et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070014737 Rabinowitz et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070028916 Hale et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031340 Hale et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070122353 Hale et al. May 2007 A1
20070140982 Every et al. Jun 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
0 358 114 Mar 1990 EP
0 606 486 Jul 1994 EP
1 080 720 Mar 2001 EP
502 761 Jan 1938 GB
WO 8500520 Feb 1985 WO
WO 9107947 Jun 1991 WO
WO 9409842 May 1994 WO
WO 9609846 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9613161 May 1996 WO
WO 9613290 May 1996 WO
WO 9613291 May 1996 WO
WO 9613292 May 1996 WO
WO 9630068 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9727804 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9736574 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9822170 May 1998 WO
WO 9831346 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9836651 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9916419 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9964094 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0000176 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0000215 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0027363 May 2000 WO
WO 0029053 May 2000 WO
WO 0047203 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0064940 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0066084 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0066206 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0076673 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0105459 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0224158 Mar 2002 WO
WO 03037412 May 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060216244 A1 Sep 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10816567 Apr 2004 US
Child 11442917 US