Patent Grant
10507297
The invention relates to the delivery of respiratory therapy to a patient. Examples of such therapies are Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment, Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), and Variable Positive Airway Pressure (VPAP). The therapy is used for treatment of various respiratory conditions including Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) and more particularly Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).
Typically, respiratory therapy is delivered in the form of a mask system positioned between a patient and apparatus providing a supply of pressurized air or breathing gas. Mask systems in the field of the invention differ from mask systems used in other applications such as aviation and safety in particular because of their emphasis on comfort. This high level of comfort is desired because patients must sleep wearing the masks for hours, possibly every night for the rest of their lives. In addition, therapy compliance can be improved if the patient's bed partner is not adversely affected by the patient's therapy and wearing of the mask generally.
Mask systems typically have a highly clinical aesthetic (as will be described below). This can lead to patients becoming embarrassed about their therapy since the clinical aesthetic serves as a blatant reminder that they are ill and consequently can leave a negative perception of the patient in the mind of an observer.
Mask systems typically, although not always, comprise (i) a rigid or semi-rigid portion often referred to as a shell or frame, (ii) a soft, patient contacting portion often referred to as a cushion, and (iii) some form of headgear to hold the frame and cushion in position. If the mask system does in fact include multiple components, at least some assembly and adjustment may be required, which can be difficult for patients who may suffer from lack of dexterity, etc. Further, mask systems often include a mechanism for connecting an air delivery conduit. The air delivery conduit is usually connected to a blower or flow generator.
Patient contacting portions, e.g., cushions, are typically constructed of a silicone material, but patient contacting portions including foam are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,683 discloses a lining for a mask made of a polyurethane foam covered with skin (e.g., latex or silicone). However, skinned foam does not allow the portion in contact with the face to breathe, which can lead to skin irritation, and the sealing portion may be subject to creasing which may cause discomfort and lead to leak. The skin can also feel too hard for some patients, depending on the thickness and support structure. The skin also does not allow a high degree of local deformation and may be subject to tension transfer across its surface, which can result in shifting of the mask on the face and loss of seal/comfort.
A range of mask systems are known including nasal masks, nose & mouth masks, full face masks and nasal prongs, pillows, nozzles & cannulae. Masks typically cover more of the face than nasal prongs, pillows, nozzles and cannulae. Nasal prongs, nasal pillows, nozzles and cannulae all will be collectively referred to as nasal prongs.
There is a continuous need in the art to provide mask systems with a high level of comfort and usability and a newly perceived need to provide mask systems having improved aesthetics (i.e., less clinical and bulky).
One aspect of the present invention is to provide a therapy compliance-enhancing patient interface.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a comfortable patient interface.
Another aspect of the invention is to provide a patient interface having a non-medical appearance. In one form, this may be achieved by creating a soft, comfortable, flexible patient interface that has the appearance of an article of clothing.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a comfortable, unobtrusive, easy to use, stable system for delivering a supply of air at positive pressure to the entrance to the patient's airways such as may be used in nasal CPAP treatment of sleep disordered breathing. This system is compatible with a range of interfaces and/or sealing structures, including nasal masks, nasal cushions, mouth masks, etc. The system has been particularly designed so that a patient may comfortably sleep in a range of different positions, including rolling onto the side of their face, without experiencing discomfort and while maintaining adequate therapy. This system offers a number of improvements over the prior art.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure that provides improved comfort, enhanced interfacing performance, and ease of use over prior sealing structures. Aspects of the improved interfacing structure are that it requires less precise fitting than prior sealing structures and does so with a more comfortable and even pressure distribution on the patient's face. The interfacing structure has a more natural feel against the skin than prior sealing structures and also features controlled air permeability so that the skin is allowed to breathe. Another aspect of the improved interfacing structure is that it is less prone to disruption by movement than prior sealing structures.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air delivery system for providing a supply of air from a source of air at positive pressure to an interfacing structure located at the entrance to the airways of a patient. The air delivery system includes a manifold adapted to be connected with the supply of positive air pressure and at least one tube connected to the manifold and is adapted to deliver the supply of air to the interfacing structure. Each tube is structured to allow movement between (1) an open phase in which the tube allows the passage of air and (2) a collapsed phase in which the tube is collapsed. Each tube is structured such that weight of a typical patient's head against bedding apparel (e.g., pillow) is sufficient to collapse the tube from the open phase to the collapsed phase.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air conduit or tube that is comfortable to lie on because: when you lie on the conduit, the part that you lie on squashes flat or substantially flat; the conduit is generally sufficiently thin so that you can lie on it; and/or the conduit does not need to flatten because it is already sufficiently comfortable.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a system of air conduits having sufficient redundancy that if some or one of the conduits is occluded, the system retains sufficient flow of air at therapeutic pressure.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air delivery system adapted to provide a therapeutic supply of air at pressure when a portion is being lain on by the patient.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air delivery system for providing a supply of air from a source of air at positive pressure to an interfacing structure located at the entrance to the airways of a patient. The air delivery system includes a manifold adapted to connect with the supply of positive air pressure and at least one tube connected to the manifold, the tube being adapted to deliver the supply of air to the interfacing structure. The manifold is adapted to be positioned on or in front of a crown of the patient's head in use.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air delivery and stabilizing system for providing a supply of air from a source of air at positive pressure to an interfacing structure located at the entrance to the airways of a patient. The air delivery system includes a manifold adapted to connect with the supply of positive air pressure, a pair of tubes connected to the manifold and adapted to deliver the supply of air to the interfacing structure, a rigidizing element provided to each tube to add rigidity to the tube, and a back strap provided to the tubes and/or rigidizing elements and adapted to engage the back of the patient's head. Each tube is adapted to extend from a respective side of the manifold at or in front of the crown of the patient's head, along a respective side of the patient's face between the patient's eye and ear, and under the patient's nose.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient including a support structure adapted to be coupled to an air delivery system that provides a supply of air from a source of air at positive pressure and an interface provided to the support structure. The interface is constructed of a soft viscoelastic foam and adapted to contact with surfaces of the patient's face and nose in use.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface including a first loop and a second loop connected to the first loop. The first loop is adapted to pass along an underside of the patient's nose, along the cheek region, above the ears, and over the crown of the patient's head to define a sealing force against the underside of the patient's nose in use. The second loop is adapted to pass generally over the occipital bone to define a headgear vector at an angle between 40°-80° with the first loop.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface has a thickness of about 5-50 mm.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface includes an unskinned surface on surfaces for interfacing or contacting the patient's skin in use.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface includes sufficient softness and compliance in a direction normal to the patient's face to conform to the facial anatomy that it is interfacing with.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface is constructed of breathable or permeable material.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface constructed of foam and adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface is adapted to provide a compressive force to seal against the patient's skin in use.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface has a textured surface.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The interfacing structure includes an interface adapted to contact with skin surfaces under the patient's nose in use, wherein the interface includes a rate of return of less than about 5 cm/sec.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an air delivery system for providing a supply of air from a source of air at positive pressure to a patient. The air delivery system includes an interfacing structure located at the entrance to the airways of the patient and a pair of tubes adapted to extend along a respective side of the patient's face and deliver the supply of air to the interfacing structure. Each tube has at least one portion that is structured to allow movement between (1) an open phase in which the tube allows the flow of air without undue resistance and (2) at least a partially collapsed phase in which the tube is at least partially collapsed to restrict or prevent the flow of air. Each tube is structured such that it is comfortable to lie on.
Another aspect relates to a gas delivery system for providing a supply of gas from a source of gas at positive pressure to an interfacing structure located at an entrance to the airways of a patient. The gas delivery system includes at least two gas passages adapted to be in communication with the source of gas to deliver the supply of gas to the interfacing structure. The at least two gas passages are structured and configured to cooperate such that an adequate supply of gas is delivered to the interfacing structure even if one of the gas passages assumes a collapsed configuration to prevent or substantially impede the flow of air.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are a part of this disclosure and which illustrate, by way of example, principles of this invention.
The accompanying drawings facilitate an understanding of various embodiments of this invention. In such drawings:
a to 2-4b illustrate attachment of a patient interface to a PAP device according to another embodiment of the present invention;
a, and 3-2b illustrate a tube of a patient interface in open and collapsed phases according to an embodiment of the present invention;
a to 3-4f illustrate various cross-sections of a tube along its length according to an embodiment of the present invention;
a to 3-5c are schematic views of a tube of a patient interface in open and collapsed or partially collapsed phases according to another embodiment of the present invention;
a to 3-6b illustrate a tube having a concertina configuration according to another embodiment of the present invention;
a to 13-7c illustrate foams according to alternative embodiments of the present invention;
The following description is provided in relation to several embodiments which may share common characteristics and features. It is to be understood that one or more features of any one embodiment may be combinable with one or more features of the other embodiments. In addition, any single feature or combination of features in any of the embodiments may constitute additional embodiments.
While the patient interfaces below are described as including under-the-nose interface types, the patient interfaces may be adapted for use with other suitable interface types. That is, the interface type is merely exemplary, and aspects of the present invention may be adapted to include other interface types, e.g., nasal cushions, nasal prongs, full-face masks, mouth masks, etc.
Embodiments of the invention are directed towards moving from uncomfortable, unattractive mask systems to sleek and elegant patient interfaces that are soft, comfortable, lightweight, functional, therapy enhancing, fashionable, easy and intuitive to fit and adjust with little or no adjustment, shape holding, low impact, low profile, continuity of form, individualized or customized, and/or are more appealing and much less objectionable by patients and bed partners alike. The subject patient interfaces are less obstructive, less obtrusive, anatomically coherent and appear like an organic extension of and/or blends with the patient, rather than a bulky, mechanical extension affixed to the patient which can appear to be ungainly or unattractive. This can help the patient and the patient's bed partner more readily relax and/or sleep during treatment. Moreover, the patient interface can improve the overall perception such that the patient is simply wearing a garment like a night cap or bed clothes, etc. rather than being treated for a respiratory illness. This improved perception can help increase the chances that the patient will actually wear the patient interface and comply or better comply with therapy, therefore increasing the likelihood of effective therapy for the user of the device. There is also the possibility that the bed partner will more readily accept and participate in the patient's therapy by encouraging the use of a sleep-enhancing device that is easy to use/adjust, more attractive and/or appealing interface.
Patient Interface
1. Air Delivery and Stabilizing System
1.1 Background and Summary
Known patient interfaces typically include separate headgear and air delivery components that are used to locate and supply breathable gas to a mask or the like. Known headgear typically includes an assembly of elastic (or inelastic) straps, buckles, locks, and/or clips. Known air delivery components typically include 15-22 mm diameter spiral reinforced tubing and swivel connectors. These known arrangements of headgear and air delivery components can be difficult to use for those who are less dexterous and/or unfamiliar with them. These known arrangements of headgear and air delivery components can also be uncomfortable or impractical to lie on.
One aspect of the present invention relates to air delivery and interfacing structure stability provided by one combined system. In the illustrated embodiment, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 includes four main components, i.e., tubing 40, a rigidizer 50, a back strap 60, and a manifold 70 (e.g., see
1.2 Tubing
In the illustrated embodiment, the tubing 40 includes two tubes or inlet conduits 42 (also referred to as gas passages or gas conduits) communicated with the interfacing structure 20 to deliver breathable gas to the interfacing structure 20 (e.g., see
Each tube 42 includes a first end 42.1 adapted to engage a respective end of a frame 22 of the interfacing structure 20 and second end 42.2 adapted to engage a respective end of the manifold 70, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the tube portions 25 of the frame 22 and manifold 70 (e.g., see
In an alternative embodiment, the two tubes may be independently connected to the supply of gas (e.g., positive airway pressure (PAP) device or flow generator). For example, as schematically shown in
In another embodiment, the two tubes may be joined together at an outlet of the PAP device (e.g., both tubes adapted to be coupled to a single outlet of the PAP device), and then the tubes bifurcate (i.e., split or divide into separated tubes) towards the interfacing structure. For example, as shown in
1.2.1 Collapsible and Thin
In the illustrated embodiment, each tube 42 is structured such that it may move between two phases, i.e., a first open phase in which the tube 42 allows the passage of air (e.g., see
In the open phase, the tube is open or at least partially open so that the tube allows the passage of air, e.g., without undue resistance to flow, sufficient to provide treatment. In the collapsed phase, the tube is collapsed to substantially prevent the passage or conductance of air.
It should be appreciated that each tube need not collapse fully or entirely to provide improved comfort. For example, each tube may be structured such that it may move between a first open phase in which the tube 42 allows the passage of air and a second partially or substantially collapsed phase (e.g., see
In a partially or substantially collapsed phase, opposing inner walls of the tube may engage one another at one or more points or surfaces along their length such that conductance through the partially or substantially collapsed tube is minimized or even reduced to negligible amounts. Also, in the partially or substantially collapsed phase, the tube may be open enough to maintain a small degree of conductance of pressurized gas. A small degree of patency can be accomplished using wall thicknesses of a certain gauge (such that opposed walls will not contact or fully contact one another upon application of loads normally encountered during therapy) and/or one or more short anti-crush ribs provided to an inside surface of the tube.
Each tube 42 is sufficiently air tight and structured to deliver air from the top of the patient's head to the patient's nose without discomfort to the patient, e.g., see
In an embodiment, each tube 42 may have sufficient strength to maintain patency or an open, unblocked state without being pressurized. That is, the tube 42 may be structured such that it only collapses when it is “actively” compressed, otherwise the tube 42 remains in its open phase. In an alternative embodiment, the supply of gas may help to inflate each tube.
Each tube 42 may collapse anywhere along its length and may collapse to a substantially flat configuration so the tube 42 is substantially flat against the patient's face for comfort. However, the tube 42 may be structured to collapse along selected portions thereof, e.g., middle only, central only, etc.
In another embodiment, at least one tube may have at least one laterally ballooning feature. In such a tube (also referred to as a “bubble” tube), a portion of the tube is collapsed or partially collapsed and a portion of the tube is open, e.g., the tube is “pinched” in the middle to provide a general figure-8 shape. In another embodiment, at least one tube may have a relatively wide, flat shape to provide a stretched-out tube adapted to cover more of the patient's cheeks. For example,
It should be appreciated that the patient interface preferably does not collapse at the manifold and in an area at the front of the patient's nose, e.g., at the interfacing structure 20. That is, the manifold may be constructed of a substantially rigid material and the interfacing structure 20 may include a substantially rigid frame (e.g., frame 22 shown in
In an embodiment, each tube 42 may be molded from a silicone material, e.g., liquid silicone rubber (LSR), having a thin wall thickness of about 0.5 mm. However, each tube may have a wall thickness in the range of about 0.3 mm to 5 mm. The tubes may have varying colors, and the tubes may be formed in a mold with a polished surface to provide the tubes with smooth exterior surfaces. However, each tube may be constructed from other soft, flexible materials, e.g., thermoplastic elastomers (e.g., Santoprene), foam, foam laminate, closed cell impermeable foam, dipped and knitted textiles including cotton or silk. In an embodiment, each tube may be constructed from two sheets of material, e.g., laminate, that are attached to one another, e.g., heat welded, to form a tube. In an alternative embodiment, each tube may be constructed of a plurality of elements, e.g., relatively rigid elements, arranged in a concertina configuration so as to allow the tube to move between open and collapsed phases. In an embodiment, each tube may have a concertina configuration that allows each tube to collapse from one volume to another smaller volume. For example,
The tube arrangement according to an embodiment of the present invention contrasts with prior arrangements such as InnoMed's Nasal Aire and other forms of nasal cannula that are designed to resist crushing (i.e., breathable gas is able to be delivered through both tubes all the time) and thus present an uncomfortable structure for a patient to lie on. Furthermore, unlike prior arrangements, the tube arrangements according to embodiments of the present invention are capable of providing a sufficient supply of pressurized gas when one of the pair of tubes is fully collapsed. Because of the particular arrangement of the pair of tubes in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, both tubes are not crushed at one time during normal use. This allows the patient to assume any sleeping position (e.g., total freedom of sleeping position) without compromising the supply of pressurized gas (e.g., see
1.2.2 Cross-sectional Profile
In the illustrated embodiment, each tube 42 has a non-cylindrical cross-sectional shape which provides a blending contour to blend with the patient's face (e.g., see
The contour or cross-section of each tube 42 may vary along its length, e.g., vary non-uniformly with location around the patient's head. In an embodiment, each tube may have a cross-sectional area that changes along its length with an approximately constant hydraulic diameter. For example, each tube 42 may provide flatter regions in certain areas, e.g., where the patient rests on the tube during sleep. In this way, the tubes can be said to be an organic extension of the patient's facial contours.
The internal surface 44 is relatively flat and adapted to sit substantially flush against the patient's face in use. The internal surface 44 may have a tapered configuration form an inner edge to an outer edge to provide a comfortable fit for a wide range of patients. The internal surface 44 provides a relatively large surface area which results in a more even load distribution. This arrangement is less likely to create pressure points in use. Also, the internal surface 44 may have grip-like material to help stabilize the patient interface on the patient's face. As described below, a rigidizing element may be provided to the internal surface to add rigidity to the tube.
The external surface 45 has a smooth contour that blends with the patient's face. That is, the external surface 45 has a profile or organic form with edges that blend into the patient's face, e.g., in a tangential manner, to prevent any edges from catching on bedclothes, pillows, etc., during sleep (e.g., when the patient rolls over).
As noted above, the generally D-shaped cross-section may vary along its length, e.g., tall, thin D-shaped cross-section near the patient's nose and wide, shallow D-shaped cross-section along cheek and near the top of the patient's head. For example,
However, the tubes 42 may have other suitable cross-sectional shapes, e.g., trapezoidal, semi-circular, cylindrical, oval, elliptical, flatter section, etc. Also, the tubes may have a flat configuration with anti-crush ribs. This arrangement is disclosed in U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/385,701, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
It is noted that a D-shaped or generally trapezoidal-shaped tube does not produce as pronounced pressure regions along bottom edges thereof as a semi-circular-shaped tube would. The reason for this is that the side walls of the D-shaped or generally trapezoidal-shaped tube meet the base at an acute angle α, i.e., less than 90°, as shown in
1.3 Air Delivery Rigidizing Element
In the illustrated embodiment, a rigidizing element or rigidizer 50 is provided to each tube 42 to add rigidity to the tube 42 (e.g., see
In an embodiment, the rigidizing element 50 may provide structural integrity or self-holding form to the patient interface 10 so that the patient interface 10 can hold its shape and not fall into a heap, e.g., shape memory, whether the patient interface 10 is on or off the patient's head. The shape holding arrangement maintains the tubes in a desired position and may facilitate donning of the patient interface in use.
The rigidizing element 50 may be provided to an interior and/or exterior portion of the tube 42. For example,
The rigidizing element 50 may have a varying thickness along its length, e.g., to vary the stiffness or rigidity of the tube 42 along its length. For example, the rigidizing element 50 may be thinner at the patient's cheeks and thicker at the top of the patient's head. In an embodiment, the rigidizing element 50 and/or tube 42 may be structured to accommodate a respective arm of patient eyeglasses.
In an embodiment, the rigidizing element 50 may be cut and/or formed from thin plastic sheet, e.g., 0.5 mm high impact polystyrene (or EPP foam). However, other suitable materials are possible, e.g., textile, nylon, polypropylene, high duro silicones, elastomers, etc., and the rigidizing element may have other suitable wall thicknesses, e.g., in the range of about 0.3 mm to 5 mm.
In an embodiment, each tubing/rigidizer sub-assembly may have a total thickness (e.g., thickness of collapsed tubing/rigidizer) of about 1.5 mm, e.g., 0.5 mm rigidizing element, 0.5 mm tube wall on one side, and 0.5 mm tube wall on opposite side. However, the total thickness may be more or less depending on application, e.g., 1-10 mm, 1-5 mm, less than 5 mm, about 10 mm, about 5 mm, and/or about 3 mm. It should be appreciated that the wall thickness of the tube and/or rigidizer may be adjusted for comfort and/or robustness, e.g., wall thicknesses thickened. The wall thickness of the tube and rigidizer is preferably as thin as possible, but may be thickened so as to be more shape-holding, self-supporting, and/or robust.
In an embodiment, a separate rigidizing element 50 may be employed. For example, see International Patent Application PCT/AU03/00458 (published as WO 03/090827), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In an embodiment, a separate rigidizing element 50 may be formed, and then attached to the respective tube 42, e.g., by an adhesive or by a mechanical interlocking arrangement.
In another embodiment, the rigidizing element 50 may be co-molded or co-extruded with the respective tube 42. That is, the tube 42 and rigidizing element 50 may form an integral, one-piece structure.
In another embodiment, the rigidizing element may made of polypropylene and the tube may be made of a thermoplastic elastomer of a grade suitable for welding/co-molding to the polypropylene rigidizing element.
In an alternative embodiment, the rigidizing element may include multiple components that are adjustable or movable with respect to one another, e.g., slidable, to adjust the position and/or rigidity provided by the rigidizing element.
1.4 Back Strap
In the illustrated embodiment, a back strap 60 is provided to the tubing/rigidizer sub-assembly (e.g., see
In an embodiment, the back strap 60 (also referred to as an elasto-stabilizer or elastic stabilizer) includes a length of elastic strap 62. The two ends of the elastic strap 62 are attached to the tubing/rigidizer sub-assembly, e.g., via eyes 46 provided to respective tubes 42 as shown in
In use, the back strap 60 may sit in a range of positions on the patient's head and still effect an adequate interfacing force in both magnitude and direction. This arrangement allows some variation in fit size, and aids the patient's comfort in moving the back strap 60 to the most comfortable of locations, e.g., higher or lower positions at the back of the patient's head as shown in
The back strap 60 is primarily used to maintain the patient interface on the patient's head, rather than provide an interfacing force. That is, the interfacing structure 20 does not require high tension for interface (as described below), and therefore the back strap 60 does not need to be relied on for tension for an interfacing force.
In an embodiment, the strap 62 may have selected elastic properties, e.g., from zero extension to a relatively small extension, the tension rises and plateaus. The tension may remain generally similar over a relatively large further extension until it reaches the fully extended elastic limit.
A range of alternative straps 62 may be provided with the patient interface for use with different size heads, e.g., different elasticity, thickness, length, etc.
The back strap 60 may have other suitable configurations with selectively adjustable lengths, e.g., baseball cap adjuster (e.g., see
In yet another alternative embodiment, the back strap may be constructed of the same material as the tubes, e.g., tube and back strap co-molded to a rigidizing element. In an embodiment, the two sides of the patient interface may be molded at once, e.g., two rigidizing elements held together by the back strap which blends into both rigidizing elements. To complete the patient interface, the tubes would be engaged with a manifold and an interfacing structure.
In an alternative embodiment, the back strap may be replaced by ear anchors adapted to engage the patient's ears and support the patient interface on the patient's face.
In another embodiment, the back strap may only extend across part of the occiput (e.g., the back strap comprises resilient fingers that extend inwards from each side and press against the occiput to provide a rearwardly directed force).
1.5 Manifold
The manifold 70 is provided to interconnect the two tubes 42 and direct air flowing from a suitable source, e.g., a blower, into the two tubes 42 (e.g., see
The manifold provides a transition from the air delivery tubing leading from the PAP device to the inlet tubing leading to the interfacing structure. Thus, the manifold transitions non-crushable tubing of the air delivery tubing to crushable tubing of the inlet tubing. Also, the manifold transitions tubing profile, e.g., relatively round tubing of the air delivery tubing to relatively flat tubing of the inlet tubing.
The base portion 72 includes opposing tube portions 25 adapted to engage respective tubes 42, e.g., with a friction fit. The cross-sectional shape of the tube portions 25 may be non-circular and correspond to the cross-sectional shape of the tubes 42. The base portion 72 may be curved to match the shape of the patient's head and is otherwise suitably contoured such that it can rest and sit substantially flush with the top of the patient's head in use. However, the base portion may include other suitable connections or air holding bonds with the tubes.
The inlet tube portion 74 may be fixed to the base portion 72, or the inlet tube portion 74 may be movably coupled, e.g., swivel, to the base portion 72 so that the inlet tube portion 74 may be angled with respect to the base portion 72 in use. The swivel arrangement may provide 360° rotation or any other suitable angle range. The inlet tube portion 74 has an inlet tube 75, e.g., 15 mm diameter, adapted to connect to an air delivery tube T1 (e.g., see
In an embodiment, the manifold 70 and tubes 42 may be integrally formed as a one-piece structure, e.g., to reduce the number of parts.
In an embodiment, the manifold may be structured to control dynamic flow and/or reduce noise.
1.5.1 Location
The manifold 70 is positioned in a region on the top of the patient's head that does not interfere with a pillow when the patient interface is used (e.g., see
An advantage of this approach is that tube drag does not directly affect the interface in use. For example, by placing the manifold 70 near the crown of the head, it is positioned furthest from the interfacing structure 20, so if the air delivery tube is yanked or moved, the movement has less affect on the interface, e.g., by changing the load distribution in the interfacing region, and therefore increases the stability of the interface. Also, the positioning of the manifold enables the tube connection to the mask to be less obtrusive by avoiding the patient's field of vision.
The manifold may provide multiple functions or utilities. For example, the manifold may provide a point of reference or anchor point for the patient interface. That is, the manifold may act as a head support or stabilizer, an air delivery conduit, and an inlet tubing attachment point. In addition, the manifold resists tube drag as described above.
1.5.2 Swiveling Features
In an embodiment, the manifold 70 is generally T-shaped and defines two generally perpendicular axes, i.e., the base portion 72 along a first axis and the inlet tube portion 74 along a second axis that is perpendicular to the first axis.
The manifold 70 may incorporate swiveling features that allow the manifold 70 to swivel or hinge about one or both axes (e.g., see
1.5.3 Offset Attachment
In the illustrated embodiment, the manifold 70 is positioned at the top of the patient's head, e.g., see
The length of the tubes 42 may be selected to adjust the manifold 70 to a position where the patient can view and more easily manipulate air delivery tube connections.
In an embodiment, the manifold 70 may have an adjustable connection, e.g., sliding or translating coupling, so that two or more positions of the manifold (e.g., along a backstrap of the headgear) may be selected.
1.6 Location on Head
In the illustrated embodiment, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 includes two alternative, complementary air delivery pathways located on different parts of the patient's head (e.g., preferably either side of the patient's face) so that a patient may roll through almost a complete circle without occluding both pathways.
In an embodiment, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 has a generally oval or ring-shaped configuration (e.g., see
Each tube 42 of the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 passes along a respective side of the patient's face between the patient's eye and ear to provide an arrangement that does not obstruct the patient's vision. That is, each tube 42 is sufficiently spaced from the ear to reduce noise and sufficiently spaced from the eye so it does not affect the field of view. In an embodiment, the tube 42 passes in a direct line from the patient's nose to the crown of the patient's head. However, the tube 42 is not limited to any specific path.
For example, as shown in
In an embodiment, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 may pass along the upper jaw bone of the patient, e.g., avoid cheek and follow fleshy areas of the patient's face. Also, in an embodiment, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 may reside over the mid-point of the patient's temple in use. However, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 may be sufficiently soft so that sensitive areas do not need to be avoided for comfort.
It should be appreciated that positioning of the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 on the patient's head does not critically depend on exact alignment with certain facial features as do prior art systems. That is, a satisfactory interface may be formed and retained by the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 despite movement.
1.7 Other Aspects of System
1.7.1 Assembly
In a preferred embodiment, the patient interface 10 is structured such that little or no adjustment is needed to fit the patient interface to the patient's head. Thus, the patient interface is relatively self-locating, intuitive, auto-adjusting, easy fitting. In an embodiment, the patient interface may be assembled one handed, e.g., slip on like a hat.
As noted above, the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 has a generally oval or ring-shaped configuration, e.g., a generally truncated elliptical cone or funnel. A tapering surface or conical-elliptical ring may be provided between the inner and outer edges to define a contact surface that engages the patient. Depending on the size of the patient's head, the tapered contact surface will engage the patient's head in different positions. For example, if the patient has a larger head, patient interface may sit higher up on the patient's head. If the patient has a smaller head, the patient interface may sit more towards a rear portion of the patient's head. Once fit, the patient may adjust the back strap 60 as necessary. Thus, the patient may require a single adjustment to fit the patient interface to his/her head. Further details of such an arrangement are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/833,841, filed Jul. 28, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In an embodiment, the oval or ring-shape configuration of the air delivery and stabilizing system 30 may be adjustable, e.g., depending on patient fit and/or preference. For example, as shown in
1.7.1.1 Method to Fit Patient
In an alternative embodiment, the patient interface may be structured to provide “staged fitting” of the patient interface. In such embodiment, one part of the patient interface (e.g., air delivery and stabilizing system) may be engaged with the patient and another part of the patient interface (e.g., interfacing structure) may be subsequently engaged when the patient is ready for therapy to begin. This arrangement allows the air delivery and stabilizing system to be engaged with the patient's head, while the interfacing structure is out of engagement. For example, in the case of an Adam's circuit (e.g., such as that shown in
1.7.1.2 Sizing
In the illustrated embodiment, the patient interface includes a single adjustment point. The adjustment mechanism may be either passive (e.g., elastic back strap) or require active adjustment (e.g., baseball cap fitting) to provide a one-size fits all arrangement. In an embodiment, the adjustment point may be tailored or modified to fit the patient at the point of sale, and then altered to prevent further adjustment, e.g., tear off.
In an alternative embodiment, the patient interface may have a non-adjustable slip-on shape, e.g., like a shoe, with little or no elasticity. In this arrangement, the patient interface may be provided in many different sizes, e.g., up to 20 different sizes, 5, 10, 15, or any other number of sizes (e.g., small, medium, and large). This arrangement may be aided by high mechanical compliance of the sealing interface to provide ample fit-range.
In another alternative embodiment, the patient interface may include a method for adjusting the size (e.g., length) of the headgear in either or both of the upper and rear sections of the headgear.
1.7.1.3 Surface Properties
In embodiments, the air delivery and stabilizing system may be textured, colored, foamed, and/or flocked (e.g., lots of little bits of yarn or fluff adhered to it) to give a fabric-like feel or softness for aesthetics and/or comfort. For example, the tubing, rigidizing elements, back strap, and/or manifold may be textured, colored, foamed, and/or flocked.
In an alternative embodiment, a sock S may be provided to substantially enclose one or more portions of the tubing, rigidizing elements, back strap, and/or manifold (e.g., see
In another embodiment, different materials may be co-molded in the same mold to provide a one-piece, integrated structure. For example, instead of providing a cover or sock to tubing, a fabric or cloth material may be co-molded with silicone tubing to provide a one-piece, integrated tube with a fabric/cloth exterior surface and a silicone interior surface. In such embodiment, the fabric/cloth material may be placed in a mold and then silicone may be injected into the same mold so that it bonds with the fabric/cloth material and forms a one-piece, integrated tube.
In another embodiment, multiple portions of the patient interface may be co-molded in the same mold with different materials to provide a one-piece, integrated structure. For example, a fabric/cloth material may be co-molded with tubing constructed of a first material, a manifold constructed of a second material, and a frame constructed of a third material to provide a one-piece, integrated structure. In an embodiment, the first, second, and third materials may include the same material with different durometers or hardnesses, e.g., tubing constructed of relatively soft silicone and manifold and frame constructed of relatively hard silicone. Alternatively, the first, second, and third materials may include different polymers or materials. Further, each portion of the patient interface may include regions with different properties, e.g., end portions of the tubing may be harder than an intermediate portion of the tubing. In such embodiment, the fabric/cloth material may be placed in a mold and then the first, second, and third materials may be injected into the same mold so that all the materials bond and form a one-piece, integrated structure, e.g., integrally formed tubing, manifold, frame with fabric/cloth cover.
In another embodiment, the tubing, rigidizing elements, manifold, and/or back strap may include silicone or other elastic beading for grip. This arrangement may be particularly useful for patient's with bald heads as the beading is adapted to grip the bald head and prevent sliding or movement of the patient interface with respect to the patient's head in use. In an embodiment, the patient interface may be reversible so that the beading may be selectively used, e.g., depending on whether the patient is bald. For example, fabric may be provided on one side and beading may be provided on the opposite side so that the patient may use one or the other depending on preference, e.g., beading oriented towards the patient's head for bald heads and fabric oriented towards the patient's head for hairy heads.
1.7.1.4 Manufacture
In an embodiment, each tube 42 may be manufactured as a bifurcated tube having a co-molded thickened section that forms a rigidizer.
In another embodiment, each tube 42 may be constructed of two pieces, i.e., a top half and a bottom half attached to the top half. In an exemplary embodiment, the top half may be constructed of textile or foam (e.g., with a sealing layer), and the bottom half may constitute a rigidizer with a skin-contacting portion.
1.7.2 Low Visual Obstruction
The patient interface may incorporate one or more regions having different colors (color contrast), patterns, and/or surface textures to reduce visual impact or distraction to the user. Such coloring, patterning, and/or surface texturing may be incorporated into the tubing, rigidizing elements, manifold, back strap, and/or interfacing structure. Alternatively, a sock having coloring, patterning, and/or surface texturing may be provided to the patient interface.
For example,
Specifically, bright colors are more easily picked up by the patient and should be avoided in the field of view as they are more likely to cause a distraction than darker colors, e.g., bright colors reflect light into patient's eyes. Thus, the dark color D is positioned adjacent the field of vision to minimize visual obstruction or obtrusiveness. In an embodiment, the patient interface may only be visible to the patient at the very outer limits of their field of view, e.g., only the section of the patient interface which rests lower than the patient's eye level may be visible. Further, the dark color D may seem to disappear at the extremities of the field of view resulting in the patient undergoing very little visual obstruction.
Also, the two-tone textile cover S may slim the perception of the size of the patient interface on the patient's face. That is, this arrangement has the functional advantage that lighter colors, e.g., white, can be incorporated into the cover that make the relevant region look smaller, slimmer, or less bulky. Thus, the patient interface has a lower visual impact (e.g., less aesthetically obtrusive). In addition, the patient interface may be more fashionable like clothing. In alternative embodiments, one or more light colored lines, e.g., white lines, may be incorporated into the cover. Also, in an embodiment, the interface of the interfacing structure may include a darker color to reduce its visual obstruction.
It should be appreciated that different colors, patterns, and/or surface texture may be selected for different users. In an embodiment, the cover may be transparent or selected to blend in with the patient's skin, e.g., camouflaged or skin color. For example, if the patient has relatively darker skin, the cover could be black or dark brown to blend with the patient's skin. In an alternative embodiment, the color and/or texture of the cover may be selected to match the patient's hair.
1.7.3 Valve
In an embodiment, as shown in
1.7.4 Connection to a Blower
In an embodiment, the patient interface 10 may be connected to the blower by a pair of air delivery tubes, i.e., a 15 mm tube and a 22 mm tube. As shown in
The 15 mm tube T1 has a suitable length to allow easy patient access to the quick-release connector 90, e.g., quick-release connector 90 in patient's field of view. Also, the 15 mm tube T1 has a suitable length so that the quick-release connector 90 may be positioned sufficiently away from the patient interface so the weight of the quick-release connector may be supported by the bed mattress or other support system.
Impedance in the system is as little as possible so that therapy does not vary significantly whether one or both tubes 42 are open. Therefore, the system is designed such that the hydraulic restriction or bottleneck is provided upstream of the patient interface including the case in which only one of the tubes 42 is open, i.e., the hydraulic bottleneck is provided in the manifold 70 or anywhere upstream of the manifold 70 (e.g., in the 15 mm tube and/or in the 22 mm tube).
Impedance is at least partially based on tube length. In the illustrated embodiment, the tubing is designed such that the tubes 42 are shorter than each of the 15 mm tube and the 22 mm tube, e.g., 15 mm and 22 mm tubes at least 40-50 cm long. In an embodiment, the 22 mm inlet tube may be about 2 m long and the 15 mm inlet tube may be about 70-75 cm long, with the bottleneck in the 22 mm inlet tube due to its length. However, other suitable lengths are possible.
In an embodiment, the air delivery tubing that leads to the manifold may have a look and feel similar to the inlet tubes 42. The air delivery tubing may have a smooth, noiseless outer portion, e.g., outer portion constructed of a material that is soft to the touch and provides sound insulation. The air delivery tubing may provide continuity of form from the PAP device or blower to the manifold of the patient interface.
1.7.5.1 Clip to Isolate Tube Drag
A clip or clamp may be provided to either air delivery tube T1, T2 and/or quick release connector 90 that is adapted to attach to a bed headboard or other support system. The clip or clamp supports the air delivery tube and/or quick release connector on the bed headboard or other support system to isolate tube drag from the patient interface. In an embodiment, the clip or clamp may be magnetic to allow magnetic attachment.
For example,
1.7.5.2 Switch to Turn CPAP Therapy On/Off
A switch may be provided along any suitable portion of the patient interface that is adapted to turn the blower providing CPAP therapy on and/or off. For example, the switch may be provided on the air delivery tube or quick release connector. In an embodiment, the switch may be wirelessly communicated with the blower.
1.7.6 Inflatable Headgear
In an alternative embodiment, inflatable tubes may be provided around a relatively more rigid air delivery tube to insulate the air delivery tube from the patient's face.
1.7.7 Moveable Tubes
In an alternative embodiment, tubes may be provided that are adapted to move out of the way when the patient's head is turned.
2 Interfacing Structure
2.1 Background and Summary
Known patient interfaces typically include a silicone seal that is adapted to seal around and/or within the patient's nose and/or mouth. Sealing mechanisms may be categorized as: (1) a flap-type seal, (2) a bulk compression or gasket-type seal, or (3) a combination of (1) & (2). A flap-type seal may utilize the mechanics of a flexible membrane to achieve a reliably sealing interface. Compared to a flap-type seal that works by deflection of the flap, a bulk material seal works by compression of the material. A preferred interfacing structure of the present invention utilizes foam in the form of a bulk compression type seal although the foam may take other forms.
One aspect of the present invention relates to an interfacing structure 20 in the form of an under-the-nose interface 80 made of foam (e.g., see
For example, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the foam interface 80 is constructed of a very soft foam that is compliant enough to gently cradle the patient's nose and provide an unobtrusive and comfortable nasal interface, e.g., under-the-nose foam interface. The under-the-nose foam interface provides the visual freedom and unobtrusiveness of nasal prongs, without the intrusiveness and potential discomfort of silicone prongs inside the patient’ nose.
One issue that has emerged with the prevalence of nasal prong interfaces is a recognizable decrease in breathing comfort where a cold, frictional or burning sensation may be felt inside the nose from air rushing through the nose, particularly upon inhalation and higher pressures when the air travels at higher speeds through the nose. This sensation has been dubbed the ‘jetting effect’. This jetting effect is thought to be partially due to the air entering the nose in a channeled manner through the narrow prong orifices and impinging on sensitive nasal mucosa. It may also be attributed to air temperature and humidity. Thus, another advantage of the under-the-nose foam interface is the elimination or minimization of the jetting effect that nasal prongs are known to produce. This is because the air is not being forced through narrow orifices inside the nostrils, but through a larger orifice that covers both nostril openings. The exit of the foam interface remaining entirely or predominantly outside of the nose allows for the impedance of the orifice to be matched to, or lower than, the nostril openings so that flow is not restricted and formed into a jet stream inside the nose. The foam also has a diffusing effect at the boundary of the flow as it enters the nose. The irregular surface of the foam may add turbulence to the boundary layer of the flow entering the nostrils and as such navigates the nostril cavity with less concentrated force on the sensitive anatomy inside the nose. This diffusing effect also allows for the alignment of the interface with the nostril to be less critical with respect to the generation of the jetting effect. The foam being slightly air permeable also has the advantage of minimizing the aspects of the jetting effect that are attributable to humidity and temperature. Cold air and temperature variable air entering and exiting the nose can cause an irritating sensation inside the nose with known interfaces. Upon exhalation, the foam may be infused with warm exhaled air, and upon subsequent inhalation this small amount of warm air may reenter and/or heat the air stream that enters the nose therefore reducing the jetting effect. Yet another advantage of the foam in relation to the jetting effect is its ability to retain moisture (e.g., moist air), again due to the permeable nature of the foam. Upon inhalation, the stored moisture may add to the humidity of the inhaled air and reduce the jetting effect.
In another embodiment, the under-the-nose interface may have a central portion that divides the singular orifice into two. In this embodiment, the two resulting orifices may be size-matched, smaller than, or larger than the nostrils.
In both of the aforementioned embodiments (single and double orifice), alignment of the orifices with the nostrils can be relaxed compared to nasal prong designs. This is a result of not having positively intruding features inside the nostrils. The interface allows for greater movement along the surface of the skin without compromising the interface and/or seal. As a result of the very low hardness of the foam (e.g., particularly the very soft viscoelastic grades), the foam may intrude slightly inside the nostrils as it takes the shape of the anatomy it is interfacing with.
In a preferred embodiment, the interface may be made from a very soft, viscoelastic polyurethane foam grade. One method of quantifying the viscoelastic nature of foam is to measure the rate of deformation or recovery of the foam after it has been compressed. In an embodiment, the rate of recovery is designed so that the interface remains comfortably and sealingly engaged with the user's face while wearing the mask. The viscoelastic nature has particular benefits for maintaining comfort and seal during movement while wearing the mask. In other embodiments, the range of viscoelasticity may range from a foam that has a very slow rate of recovery to a very fast rate of recovery.
Another aspect of an interfacing structure in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention is its relatively slow rate of return compared to known interfacing structures. A silicone or other rigid elastomer cushion has a relatively fast rate of return in the order of 5 to 10 cm/sec or higher. In one embodiment of the invention, the interfacing structure has a rate of return of less than about 5 cm/sec. In a preferred embodiment, the rate of return is about 1 cm/sec.
Rate of return can be measured by sandwiching a sample of bulk material between a bottom flat, rigid plate and a top flat, rigid, light plate. The top plate is moved downwards by a predetermined distance, compressing the bulk material and then is released. The time it takes the bulk material to raise the top plate to the original position is measured. The measure will be relative only, because the time taken to return to the original position will be dependant on the weight of the plate. The rate of return is equal to the thickness of the foam divided by the time to return. A relatively fast rate of return will take place in under a second.
The preferred type of foam was measured using the above mentioned rate of return test and a very light top plate (of rigid foam) was used such that the weight of the top plate was negligible. The block of foam sandwiched between the two plates was 5 cm thick and was manually sandwiched down until it was about 1 cm thick. It took 3.5 sec to return. This corresponds to a rate of return of about 1 cm/sec. By comparison, a typical prior art silicone membrane would return in under half a second.
A related material property is hysteresis. With reference to
It should be appreciated that the under-the-nose interface may be constructed of other materials that form a cellular polymeric structure, e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, silicone, latex rubber.
It should also be appreciated that the under-the-nose interface may be constructed of other suitable material types and configurations, e.g., textile covered foam, textile, textile strata, silicone (e.g., dual wall silicone under-the-nose interface with membrane and undercushion), silicone foam.
In yet another embodiment, the foam interface features the foam acting as a HCH (Hygroscopic Condenser Humidifier) or HME (Heat and Moisture Exchanger). This allows heat and moisture to be captured and returned to the user's airway to increase breathing comfort as described above in relation to the jetting effect.
The porous moisture absorbing and moisture retaining properties of the foam allow for the addition of scented vaporous liquids to the interface before or during the wearing of the interface. Such scents may or may not be therapeutic in nature. The mechanical properties of the foam may be modified (e.g., pore size, surface tension) to adjust the rate of evaporation of the scented liquid. Similarly, the drying performance of the foam may be adjusted.
2.2 Bulk Material Properties
In the illustrated embodiment, the foam interface 80 is a very soft, flexible, visco-elastic foam (e.g., converted slabstock) that has a soft, comfortable feel against the patient's skin and a hardness or stiffness that resembles the soft fleshy anatomy of the patient's face with properties as defined in
The foam interface provides a static seal that may allow lower strap tension from headgear to create a sealing force and a dynamic seal that allows the interface to withstand macro-movement from a patient rolling around in bed and maintain an interface. Such interface properties are described in greater detail below.
The visco-elastic foam has a much more natural feeling against the patient's skin compared to conventional silicone interfaces, which may have a sweaty, plastic feel. The foam may include a moisture content, e.g., slightly moist or damp after usage or washing, which may provide a cooling effect or a refreshing feel when air flows through the foam in use.
In a preferred embodiment, the foam interface 80 may be a low hardness, low to high density, soft, low odor, low air-permeability, low resiliency, low isocyanate index polyether polyurethane foam with a very fine heterogeneous cell structure and visco-elastic behavior. The foam also features color and colorfastness to a pantone reference. In addition, the foam may provide moisture wicking ability to wick moisture or sweat from the patient's skin. In an embodiment, properties of the foam interface may vary along its thickness, e.g., density, porosity, or hardness of the foam may vary in different layers, and/or properties of the foam interface may vary along its perimeter, e.g., breathability may vary in different regions of the interface's perimeter. Visco-elasticity is the range of recovery of the foam interface from compression.
For example,
c illustrates a foam including a reinforcement element R, e.g., constructed of a laminate of stiffer foam, plastic, or metal, at an interior portion thereof. The reinforcement element R is structured to add rigidity to the foam in use. The foam portions on each side of the reinforcement element may include a homogeneous structure (as shown in
One aspect of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is the low hardness of the foam (or other soft material) of the sealing structure. Hardness can be defined in terms of both indentation and compression hardness. A preferred indentation hardness is in the range of 25 to 80 N at 40% while a preferred compression hardness is in the range of 0.4 to 1.5 kPa.
The foam interface according to an embodiment of the present invention may also include a degree of one or more of the following characteristics:
Cellular foam type—flexible polyurethane;
Polyurethane type—polyether based;
Cell structure—control of the cell structure of the foam is desirable to control the feel (also known as the “hand”) and look of the foam. The cell structure may be controlled to have a more heterogeneous or more homogeneous distribution of cell sizes, and this can affect the feel and look of the foam in various ways. The foam can also be produced to have a cell structure with varying degrees of open and closed cell content, which can affect several aspects of the foam's properties, e.g., air and moisture permeability.
Sealing—foam with a high closed cell content may have sufficiently low permeability so that a positive pressure seal may be created inside the interface upon compression against the skin. In an embodiment, the foam may include significantly more closed cells than open cells, e.g., 90% closed and 10% open. The compressive force provided by the foam to seal is therefore a function of the mechanical stiffness of the foam, and also the compressive stiffness added by having pressurized air inside the foam's cellular structure (e.g., air spring/air pressure stiffness). In this manner, the sealing function is provided while still allowing a small deliberate flow of air to escape along the surface and through the body of the foam structure. In embodiments, the foam has a cut, open cellular structure against the skin, however other embodiments may include foam that has a permeable skin. Another embodiment may have foam that is skinned (both permeable and impermeable skin) only on the skin contacting surfaces of the interface, leaving flow to pass through the body of the foam structure rather than along the skin-contacting surface.
Air permeability—the foam can be produced to have a controlled range of air permeability. Typically, for a sealing application, foam would be produced to have the highest closed cell content possible to prevent air or moisture from passing through the foam. In an embodiment, it may be desirable that there is allowed a relatively small amount of air permeability. This has several distinct advantages in relation to both the comfort and sealing performance of the interface when it is worn, e.g., allowing a small, diffuse flow to pass through the foam gives the skin in contact with the interface the ability to breathe, and for excess moisture to be removed from the interface during use;
Air permeability durability—maintenance of the desired level of air permeability throughout the component usage life is desirable because the flow through all elements of the mask system may be required to meet a given specification. Changes in air permeability can occur with cyclic mechanical compression loading therefore measures that are taken to improve the durability of the foam structure in relation to its permeability are an advantage. In a preferred embodiment, a polyurethane formulation that uses an MDI (Methylene-Bis-Di-Isocyanate) type isocyanate may be chosen to give the foam a durable closed cell content;
Odor/Volatiles—As the foam is intended to be used in close proximity to a person's nose, any measure that can be taken to minimize or preferentially modify the odor is an advantage. In a preferred embodiment, a polyurethane formulation that uses an MDI (Methylene-Bis-Di-Isocyanate) type isocyanate is a preferred choice to minimize odor;
Particulates—The chemistry and processing of the foam is chosen such that the foam component will not produce small particles that may be inhaled during use;
Feel/Hand—There are aesthetic advantages to producing the foam to have a feel that is silky and soft. In a preferred embodiment, the foam is produced to have a fine cell heterogeneous cell structure to maximize the smooth feel of the foam, and this can also aid in minimizing the potential for skin abrasion and irritation. Another aspect of the foam's mechanical properties that may aid its aesthetic appeal is for it to be produced with a high level of visco-elasticity, which gives the foam an intriguing interactive property;
Durability—The foam chemistry may be chosen so that it maintains its desired mechanical properties for the required shelf life and usage life of the component (e.g., foam structure may be manipulated to have predetermined life span, ranging from single use to long term use). This affords the advantage of providing a renewable product to the user on suitable replacement frequencies whereby the foam component may be replaced on a daily, weekly, monthly or other basis. Components that are packaged in predetermined multiples may then be supplied to the user, e.g., on a 3, 6, or 12 monthly or other suitable basis;
Thermal stability—the foam may be designed to withstand the thermal conditions of storage and transportation. It may also be designed to withstand the temperatures of disinfection and sterilization processes (e.g., autoclaving temperatures and potentially temperatures up to 180 degrees);
UV stability/Light fastness—the foam material will not breakdown easily with light exposure;
Swelling resistance—the foam component may be designed to have given swelling characteristics when saturated with water or other liquids. It may be designed to minimize or maximize its change in geometry depending on the desired characteristics of the foam under saturated conditions (e.g., swelling may be desirable to open the pores of the foam for cleaning, swelling may be undesirable to preserve the functional geometry under saturated conditions);
Dryability—the foam component may be designed to become dry under specific time constraints and environmental conditions, e.g., the component may be moist after usage or cleaning procedures so it may be desirable for the component to dry as quickly as possible prior to further usage, e.g., moisture in the interface may be desirable under certain usage conditions (cool feeling against the skin in hot conditions), so it may be advantageous for the component to retain moisture for longer periods of time, e.g., the component may be designed to dry during use by the air flowing through the material under the pressurized conditions during CPAP therapy (self drying);
Hydrolytic stability—the chemical formulation of the polyurethane foam may be chosen to give the foam a desired level of hydrolytic stability. The choice of a polyether type polyol over a polyester type polyol may give the foam improved resistance to hydrolysis (mechanical breakdown in the presence of moisture);
Color—the foam component may be colored to a defined Pantone reference (e.g. PC287);
Color fastness—A key challenge with respect to the use of foams is discoloration, both from natural aging and environmental factors during use. This is particularly an issue with natural and light colored foams. One method of countering discoloration is to deliberately color the foam with colors that change less obviously with age and usage (e.g., darker and more intense colors may discolor less). That is to say that the coloring of the foam has a functional attribute in preserving the perceived utility and cleanliness of the component during its usage life. Another issue that may occur is the running of any dye or pigment that is removably included in the foam structure. In a preferred embodiment, a reactive colorant is incorporated so that color reacts into the foam chemical structure so that it becomes part of the polyurethane chemical background, e.g., Reactint™ Colorants from Milliken Chemical. This gives the foam a significant advantage in its intended application to resist discoloration such that the product presents well upon initial usage and remains presentable with ongoing use;
Slabstock packaging—slabstock foam may be wrapped and sealed in plastic for shipment and storage;
Component packaging and distribution methods—The foam interface components may be designed to have a predetermined usage life. In this case, the component may need to be replaced on a more frequent basis than that which is currently known in the industry. For convenience of replacement, the component may be packaged to include multiple components in one package (e.g., box or carton). For example, one box or carton of components may include 50 components, 100 components, monthly supply of components, yearly supply of components, or other suitable basis. Components may be individually packaged and manufactured as part of a continuous perforated strip and provided in one package (e.g., single foam interface in one package similar to a condom wrapper having two side walls sealed about their perimeter). The components may be in grouped or solitary component cells. In an embodiment, a significant advantage is afforded by vacuum packaging the components. This form of packaging offers protection against aging from environmental factors (e.g., oxygen, humidity), as well as the ability to provide the component in a customized micro-environment (e.g., inert gases to prevent aging, scented gases for therapeutic and non-therapeutic purposes, color, flavor). Vacuum packaging also offers a significant advantage in reducing the physical volume of the product for shipping efficiency and logistical convenience. The foam can be compressed for extended periods of time—weeks or months—and still return to its uncompressed shape when the package is opened.
Machinability—foam may be produced to be sufficiently dense and hard so that it can be machined into intricate 3D geometries;
Biocompatibility—Biological safety (biocompatibility) is paramount in the main intended applications for the foam. It must therefore not emit any harmful volatiles or have any harmful or irritating interactions with the human body. The chemistry and processing of foam is chosen to produce a foam that is in compliance with ISO 10993 biocompatibility standards;
Microbial growth—The foam structure may provide an environment that houses potential microbial (e.g., bacterial, fungal) growth, particularly in the presence of warmth and humidity and in close proximity to the nose. Any measures that can be inhibitory to the growth of fungus and bacteria may be desirable to preserve the cleanliness and/or prolong the usage life of the component. Typically, this is achieved by using non-porous materials or skinned porous materials that are minimally absorbent and easily cleanable for components that are in intimate contact with the user. However, due to the significant advantages for comfort and sealing performance in using a revealed, cut or open cellular structure (e.g., cut foam) against the face (as outlined in this disclosure), other methods must be pursued to address cleanliness and longevity of the component. In embodiments, the foam interface component is configured to be replaced at suitable frequencies (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly or other suitable regime). Suitable cleaning and maintenance regimes may also be recommended for the component (e.g., washing, drying, cleaning solutions (e.g., isopropyl alcohol), steaming, microwave sterilization). Another method to inhibit microbial growth is to include an antibacterial or antimicrobial agent (e.g., AEGIS brand antimicrobial for polyurethane foams) into the foam chemistry; and
Recyclable/Biodegradable—As the foam interface may be a frequently replaced component, the foam grade may be selected to be degradable within a chosen timeframe for minimal environmental impact. This may be expressed as a half life for the material to break down in landfill. In an embodiment, the foam is designed to break down in a time frame that is much less than materials known in the industry (e.g., silicone, skinned porous structures, gels). This may be achieved by augmenting the chemistry of the foam and porous structure of the foam to allow the ingress of landfill and microorganisms that aid the breakdown of the foam. Another significant advantage of the foam that minimizes environmental impact is that the material is much softer and of much lower densities than typical materials known in the industry, meaning that the material may be easily compressed and take up far less space in landfill.
As noted above, the foam interface components may be available individually and/or in box sets or cartons. This arrangement provides the possibility of a broad range of distribution channels, e.g., available via home-healthcare dealer, chemist, internet, etc.
In an embodiment, when the interface component wears out or needs replacement, the patient may order a box when needed or a replacement box (e.g., including daily-use interface components) may be periodically sent out to a patient, e.g., patient signs up for 1 year supply with monthly delivery.
This arrangement provides repeat business for a home-healthcare dealer. Also, this arrangement creates assembly line efficiencies because an assembly step (i.e., attachment of interface component to frame) is transferred to the patient. This arrangement may be adapted to reduce shipping by setting up manufacturing locally. In addition, this arrangement may provide an advantage to sleep labs because they do not need to sterilize, but just use disposable interface components.
In an embodiment, the packaging of the component may reflect replacement or reordering requirements. For example, the last items in a box may be packaged differently to indicate “end of supply”. In another example, the packaging may include different colors to indicate different days, weeks, months, etc.
As noted above, the foam structure may have a certain usage life or life span. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the foam structure may include an end-of-life indicator to indicate that this usage life has been reached.
For example, the end-of-life indicator may include one or more of the following: pH based color change (microbes produce acid to cause color change at replacement frequency); dirt/color changes; environmental aging (take environmental gases out of packaging); adhesive deteriorates with time (provides single assembly so patient cannot remove component without destroying it—cohesive strength of glue greater than adhesive); and/or packaging include color guides that you match the component to see whether it needs replacement.
2.3 Surface Properties
The foam interface 80 may be manufactured (e.g., from free rise slab stock) to have a skinned surface or a cut, unskinned surface. Because foam has a cellular internal structure, when the foam is cut (e.g., die cut), an open cellular structure is exposed. The cut, open cellular structure on the surface of the interface in contact with the skin has different performance characteristics compared to a skinned foam, particularly when used as a patient interface. For example,
2.3.1 Comfort
Specifically, a foam including a cut cellular structure (e.g., see
2.3.2 Sealing and/or Gripping Function
The cut cellular surface (e.g., see
2.4 Geometry
The foam interface 80 may have a geometry that is generally cradle shaped (i.e., curvature in one direction) or saddle shaped (i.e., curvature in two directions). The interface may also have more than two directions of curvature and complex curvature arrangements to address, match, or deliberately mismatch certain anatomical regions, depending on the intended function of the geometry.
In the illustrated embodiment, the top surface of the foam interface 80 provides a saddle shape that includes curvature in two directions that aids engagement of the patient's nose and its orifices. For example, curvature in a first direction (e.g., see front view of
In an alternative embodiment, the mechanical properties of the foam may be adjusted (e.g., softer) so that the interface will seal effectively using a geometry that has a flat top surface (without curvature in the first and second directions described above).
In another embodiment, the curvature and shape of the foam may be provided by the frame, backing, or other support structure that the foam is attached to.
Most sealing interfaces known in the art (especially silicone interfaces) are membranous. They are long, thin and flexible. The cross section of the membrane has a high aspect ratio (length divided by width or thickness) and hence, in combination with the softness of the membrane's material, it buckles easily along its length and bends easily across its width. Membranes typically do not compress along their length because they buckle easily and cannot support a compressive load in the direction of its length (the material buckles before it compresses). This ability to buckle and bend gives a membrane type seal its ability to conform and adapt to the varying anatomy of the face, particularly when presented (typically) tangentially to the face. Air pressure inside the mask is known to provide a supporting reaction force to the membrane against the face.
The under-the-nose interface according to an aspect of the present invention is not a membrane and does not behave as such. Its cross sectional shape has a low aspect ratio and may be approximately square, rhomboid, rectangular or diamond in shape, as illustrated in
2.5 Thickness
In an embodiment, the foam may have a thickness of about 5-20 mm, e.g., 15 mm, depending on the hardness and visco-elasticity of the foam, so that the foam can deform with a hugging or wrapping effect under and around the bottom of the patient's nose. In other embodiments, depending on the number of layers of foam that make up the sealing interface and the mechanical properties (e.g., hardness) of each layer, the thicknesses may vary accordingly, e.g., 5-50 mm, 10-30 mm, 14-20 mm. For example, the thickness of the skin-contacting layer of foam may be very soft and very thin (e.g., 1-3 mm), and the conforming layer harder and thicker (5-20 mm). A harder and similarly thin or thinner (e.g., <1 mm) layer of foam may serve as a layer acting as an attachment mechanism.
The thickness of the foam may determine the mechanical compliance of the interface in combination with the hardness of the foam. A softer foam in combination with a greater thickness can provide additional mechanical compliance and fit range, specifically when compared to silicone seals known in the art. The density, hardness, and thickness of the foam can be controlled to achieve an interface that delivers a therapeutic pressure and a comfortable fit without fully compressing the provided foam thickness. Due to the forgiving and compliant nature of the foam, a distinct advantage over other interfaces known in the art is that of sizing consolidation, and even the possibility of providing a one-size-fits-all interface. That is, the softness and compliance of the material used in the interface may allow the interface component to fit a much broader percentage of the population with the same or a reduced number of sizes.
2.6 Orifice
In a preferred embodiment, the foam interface 80 includes a single orifice 84 adapted to interface with both of the patient's nostrils (e.g., see
2.7 Interfacing Path
In the illustrated embodiment, an external upper perimeter of the foam interface 80 forms an interfacing path P (e.g., see
For example, the foam interface may be designed to engage the underside of the nose. The geometry of the interface may be described generically as annular, having an inner and outer perimeter when observed in top view. The inner perimeter of the interface (which defines the orifice) may encompass the nostrils or partially occlude the nostrils making alignment of the interface with the nostrils less critical. The area between the inner and outer perimeter may engage a broader area of the face in comparison to other interfaces known in the art (e.g., nasal prongs) to provide a more evenly distributed pressure and low force on the face. The outer perimeter may sit within the inferior outline of the nose or give a close geometrical match to the width of the nose itself. In a preferred embodiment, the outer perimeter lies outside of the inferior outline of the nose to enhance the stability and snugness of fit by allowing the interface to have a wrapping or cradling effect around the width of the nose. This can aid the unobtrusive visual perception of the product when viewed from other than a first person perspective. Alternatively, the outer perimeter of the interface can be designed to lie outside the inferior outline of the nose, having a hugging or wrapping effect around the width of the nose. In the case where the outer perimeter of the interface is wider than the nose, this arrangement may provide enhanced stability and snugness of the interface. It may also allow for increased intuitiveness of fitting the interface, especially in combination with a first direction curvature or V-shape (looking front-on at the face). The interface then features a self-alignment mechanism and intuitive location for the nose to be snuggly received.
In an embodiment, the foam interface is structured to sit under the nostrils and the angle of the interface or interfacing vector is more diagonally upward towards the crown of the head as opposed to directly backwards and into the plane of the face, as is typical of the conventional over-the-nose interfaces.
For example, as shown in
Another embodiment is shown in
Further, the surface area provided by the frame may be smaller (e.g., narrower width across the face, narrower diameter), which may provide a smaller reaction force into the patient's face to achieve an effective interface.
2.8 Breathability
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the foam interface may include a breathable or permeable foam (e.g., based on a cut surface and/or the elimination of skin) that allows a deliberate amount of airflow both through the interface material (e.g., foam bulk structure) and between the interface and the patient's skin (e.g., cut surface of foam). Patient comfort and compliance is enhanced by decreasing the accumulation of sweat around the face, keeping the skin drier, and moderating the temperature of the skin in contact with and around the interface. Ideally, the airflow is designed to be less than an amount that causes excessive drying of the skin and cooling of the anatomy around the interface when worn on the face.
That is, the foam's construction provides a breathable interface such that condensation buildup and associated irritation can be avoided at the contact interface between the patient and interface. The foam provides “a leaky” interface (e.g., measured by a percentage of vent flow) with intentional/controllable leak through the foam structure/matrix that helps to create air circulation to keep the contact surfaces relatively dry and comfortable (e.g., about 10% of vent flow, 30-40% of vent flow). The amount of leak provided by the foam may depend on comfort, drying skin, and/or annoyance, for example.
In an embodiment, the foam interface may be constructed to leak within predictable and predetermined limits and physical locations, e.g., vary air flow permeability or breathability around the outer perimeter of the interface. Also, the material of the foam may be selected to manage moisture, e.g., avoid moisture buildup in some regions and encourage moisture in other regions, e.g., near nose for humidification. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic (e.g., moisture wicking) materials (or treatments resulting in similar properties) are some options. Moisture wicking foam adapted to “pull” moisture or sweat from the patient's skin may decrease skin breakdown, pressure sores, and/or ulceration.
The foam may be designed to feature different degrees of air permeability through the bulk of the foam and through the surface of the foam. The foam may be impermeable through its body and permeable just at its interfacing surface. Conversely, the foam may be permeable through its body and impermeable at its interfacing surface, though resulting in different sealing characteristics. For example, this could allow breathability to be achieved while achieving alternative interfacing and/or sealing characteristics to the cut-cellular structured foam interface described herein. The foam may also be structured to be impermeable throughout, or impermeable in specific locations where airflow permeability is to be avoided, e.g., into the eyes.
The breathable interface may improve the dynamic interfacing performance (i.e., the ability to withstand macro-movement from a patient rolling around in bed and maintain an interface) over conventional interfacing materials. This is achieved because a small amount of airflow is already flowing between the interface surface and the patient's skin and there is less consequence to the interfacing mechanism when it is subjected to macro-movement compared to a conventional silicone seal. Silicone relies partially on its ability to “stick” to the patient's skin to provide a stable dynamic seal. Thus, when the silicone seal is moved tangentially along the skin surface, it is forced to buckle and completely detach from the skin and be reseated normally to the face to regain its geometrical form that it was designed to sit in to seal. That is, the silicone seal will provide an abrupt leak upon shifting or macro-movement that requires reseating of the interface, whereas the breathable foam interface provides an interface that can regain its interfacing properties easily without the need to reseat the foam interface on the patient's face to recover from its buckled geometry (e.g., from movement of the face relative to the interface). This is also an effect of having an interface that does not rely on membrane mechanics to interface and/or seal. The width of the cross-section of the interface may typically be an order of magnitude larger than a membrane thickness (preferably 5-12 mm and even more preferably 8-10 mm, as compared to 0.35-1.0 mm). The larger width may allow for the interface to engage with the patient's face over a larger area, and as such may not be as sensitive to a local disruption in the interfacing mechanism due to movement or surface irregularity on the patient's face. In addition, the cut surface of the foam interface provides lower tension transfer across the surface when it is compressed into the face, which is an improvement in dynamic sealing performance over silicone membrane seals which are susceptible to leakage due to creasing when they move on the face.
In an alternative embodiment, the foam interface may have a skinned surface, and the skinned surface may be permeable to provide similar effects as a foam interface having a cut, unskinned surface. For example, the skinned surface may in the form of a breathable polyurethane skin, a membrane that allows permeability, a textured surface, a spray-on porous coating, a perforated skin, and/or a textile. In another example, as shown in
2.9 Compliance
The foam interface has a (mechanically) compliant nature that allows it to accommodate a much larger range of facial geometry compared to interfaces made of silicone and other materials known in the art. This arrangement allows for the possibility of consolidating the number of sizes required to fit a patient population, e.g., potentially a one-size-fits-all interface.
Because of the mechanical compliance of the bulk material, the foam seal conforms readily to a larger range of facial shapes as compared to a non-foam seal.
One way that compliance can be quantified is by measuring to what extent the bulk material wraps around a cylinder of a given diameter. More specifically, the angle the bulk material wraps around the cylinder can be measured with respect to the longitudinal axis of the cylinder.
A preferred foam according to an embodiment of the present invention has a cut or unskinned patient contacting surface and a thickness of between 8 and 14 mm and has a density of between 40 and 70 kg/cubic meter.
That is, the foam interface may provide superior mechanical compliance, and this combined with the fact that the region of interfacing is less complex and has less magnitude of anthropometric variation (e.g., compared to conventional nasal and full face interfaces) gives the interface superior fitting qualities. The foam can deform to the appropriate size and shape (e.g., localized deformation) without compromising the interface (e.g., buckling, creasing) and without adding discomfort to the patient (e.g., lower and more even pressure on the face). In addition, the highly compliant foam fits and interfaces with a broader range of population for a given geometry (e.g., size), especially compared to silicone interfaces. Further, the mechanical compliance of the foam interface can make the patient interface design less reliant on strap tension from headgear. In an embodiment, the patient interface may be fitted to the patient's face by fitting the air delivery and stabilizing system (e.g., headgear) and then allowing the interface to find its way to the patient's nose without the need for refined adjustments. That is, the foam interface better accommodates imprecise fitting.
The compliant nature of the foam also allows the foam to quickly adapt to the patient's face, (e.g., upon initial fitting or when the patient moves or rolls around during sleep), without compromising the interface and without adding discomfort to the patient. That is, the foam provides greater tolerance to misalignment.
2.10 Warming
The foam interface may provide a warming sensation to the patient's nares upon exhalation, e.g., similar to breathing into a blanket on a cold night. This arrangement reduces the “frozen nose” effect experienced by some users of nasal prong or nasal pillow interfaces. In an embodiment, the foam interface may include extended side portions that extend along sides of the patient's face, e.g., along upper cheek regions between the air delivery tubes and the patient's cheeks near or extending from the mouth, to provide the warming sensation to other areas of the patient's face.
2.11 Layers
In an embodiment, the interfacing structure may include a soft foam attached to a stiffer structure, e.g., 40 Shore A silicone shell with a wall thickness of approximately 1.5 mm such as the cylindrical support described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/781,929, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the interfacing structure may include multiple layers with each layer providing a certain function. For example,
For simplicity, all functions would be provided by as few physical layers or components as possible. For example, the functionality of the skin contacting layer L1 and the conforming layer L2 may be provided by one material that includes both a comfortable feel on the skin and suitable plush compressive properties to conform around the underside of the nose. In another example, the reinforcing functionality of the L3 layer and the attachment functionality of the L4 layer may be provided by the (L4) attachment mechanism, and/or by the substrate (e.g., adhesive) used to join the functional layers together.
In an embodiment, such as that shown in
In another embodiment, the L3 form holding layer may include a material that is malleable (e.g., aluminum wire) so that the interface may be manually deformed into a more effective and comfortable geometry.
In alternative embodiments, the first or skin contacting layer L1 may be flocked or covered with a textile (or other suitable breathable materials), e.g., for comfort, grip, alternative wicking properties, and/or alternative air permeability.
2.12 Attachment Mechanism
In the illustrated embodiment, the interfacing structure 20 is a separate component from the air delivery and stabilizing system 30. Therefore, an attachment mechanism is provided to secure (e.g., removably secure) the interfacing structure to the air delivery and stabilizing system. As noted above, a portion of the attachment mechanism may form a retention layer L4 of the interfacing structure.
2.12.1 General Physical Requirements
The interface component is typically a separate component to the rest of the patient interface. This is due to many reasons including: the interface geometry is usually complex and difficult to manufacture in combination with other components of the patient interface; interfaces usually need to accommodate a large anthropometric variation and as such several interchangeable interface sizes exist to cover the full range of variation; the interface may require washing many times during its life and having it removable allows for a more thorough wash and makes cleaning an easier task; and/or interface has a replacement frequency greater than that of the rest of the patient interface and needs to be removable to be replaced.
The attachment mechanism is structured such that all assembly and disassembly tasks performed by the patient should be as easy as possible, particularly considering the potentially varied ages and intellectual and physical competencies of the patient.
For ease of assembly, elements of orientation, alignment, and force are considered in the design. In an embodiment, the interface includes as little asymmetry as possible (e.g., allowing functionally correct attachment in as many different (e.g., two) orientations as possible), intuitive cues as to the method of attachment (e.g., self-aligning or self-orienting), a size, shape, and texture that is not difficult to handle (e.g., requiring minimal dexterity), tolerance to misalignment, as little force as possible to assemble, and/or as little force as possible to disassemble. A force feedback from a mechanism usually can indicate to a user that assembly has occurred and is correct. While requiring as little force as possible to assemble, a correct assembly should be evident to the patient.
If assembly force is very low, disassembly force should be higher than the assembly force to ensure that disassembly does not occur inadvertently. Disassembly force should not be too high as to risk damage to the interface component or other components of the patient interface.
The attachment of the interface to the frame of the patient interface should have no air leak (e.g., sealed) or a small, known amount of air leak over the treatment pressure range.
In an embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
As illustrated, a hook portion HP extends from the inner edge of the attachment structure AT. In use, the base B is resiliently stretched and/or simply manipulated over the hook portion HP where it is retained in an operative position, e.g., with a mechanical interference fit. As shown in
Also, the free end 185 of the hook portion HP provides an internal lip that is pressed against the foam interface 180 to provide a seal. Thus, the base B and attachment structure AT provide both attachment and a circumferential seal between the interfacing structure and the frame.
In the illustrated embodiment, the base B and attachment structure AT each have a generally planar configuration and the profile of the base B and attachment structure AT is substantially similar to the profile of the under side of the interfacing structure, e.g., elongated or elliptical ring shape.
As illustrated, the outer edges of the base B and attachment structure AT substantially align with outer edges of the under side of the foam interface 180. The inner edges of the attachment structure AT may be slightly external to inner edges of the under side of the foam interface 180, e.g., due to the hook portion HP.
However, other suitable perimeter boundaries are possible. For example, the coverage of the base B and attachment structure AT on the under side of the interfacing structure may be matched, internal, or external to the inner and outer edges of the under side geometry profile. In an embodiment, the base and attachment structure may be internal to the outer edge of the under side to prevent contact of the base and attachment structure with the patient's top lip in use.
The mechanical interference type attachment mechanism may have other suitable arrangements. For example, the mechanical interference type attachment mechanism may include: an internal lip with a sleeve section; an internal lip with angle section; an external lip with a single reinforcement layer; an external lip with a double reinforcement layer; a push-in fit with a single foam layer; or a push-in fit with a double foam layer.
In yet another embodiment, an adhesive type attachment mechanism may removably attach the interfacing structure to the patient interface. For example, an adhesive (e.g. pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA)) may be provided on the under side of the interfacing structure (e.g., in the form of a foam interface) that allows the interfacing structure to be removably attached to the frame of the patient interface.
In an embodiment, the under side and adhesive (e.g., PSA) provide thereto may have a generally planar configuration. In another embodiment, the under side and adhesive may provide a curvature along a first direction. In another exemplary embodiment, the base and adhesive may provide curvature along two or more directions, e.g., saddle shape over centering action.
The coverage of the adhesive on the under side of the interfacing structure may be matched, internal, or external to the inner and outer edges of the under side geometry profile. In an embodiment, the adhesive may be matched to the edges of the profile for ease of manufacture. In another embodiment, the adhesive may be internal to the outer edge of the under side to prevent contact of the adhesive with the patient's top lip in use.
In another embodiment, the attachment mechanism may be structured to manipulate the life span of the interface, e.g., attachment mechanism fails at a predetermined time and therefore requires replacement of the interface.
In another embodiment, no significant attachment mechanism may be provided as the interface is sandwiched between the frame and the patient's face in use.
2.12.2 Hook and Loop Material
In an embodiment, the attachment mechanism may be in the form of a hook and loop material, e.g., Velcro™. For example, the hook material may be provided on the frame and the loop material, e.g., UnBroken Loop (UBL), may be provided on the under side or base of the interfacing structure. For example, the loop material may be provided on the underside of the cylindrical support 82, e.g., by an adhesive.
This arrangement of the hook and loop material may be reversed, but in the context of an interface that has a high replacement frequency, it is preferred that the less durable side of the hook and loop material is attached to the interfacing structure, i.e., the loop material. A hook and loop style attachment mechanism allows for an intuitive assembly that requires very little force for assembly/disassembly.
A hook and loop interface typically is not airtight. Therefore, a hook and loop interface according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a small, known amount of leak that is repeatable within a defined range between assembly actions.
In an alternative embodiment, the attachment and interface-to-frame sealing functions may be performed separately. For example, a hook and loop interface may be used to provide the attachment, and a soft deformable closed loop linear interface may be used to provide the sealing. The hook and loop interface provides attachment between the interfacing structure and the frame and in doing so provides a normal force that presses the loop material onto a soft circumferential seal on the opposing side of the interface-to-frame arrangement. The interfacing structure may lie either on or adjacent to the hook material provided to the frame.
In another embodiment, instead of the interface or seal pressing against the loop material, the loop material may have a matching smooth rubber/plastic surface for the interfacing or sealing to work against.
In an exemplary embodiment, the interfacing structure may be formed by providing a sheet of foam material (e.g., slabstock or block of foam material (e.g., 1 m×0.5 m×2 m block)), laminating or otherwise attaching hook material to the foam sheet, and die cutting the foam sheet to form the desired shape of the interfacing structure.
As illustrated, a sealing lip SL extends from the inner edge of the hook material HK. In use, the hook and loop materials are removably engaged with one another, which presses the loop material LP against the sealing lip SL to provide a seal. Thus, the hook and loop type attachment mechanism provides attachment between the interfacing structure and the frame, and the sealing lip SL is deformable to provide a circumferential seal between the interfacing structure and the frame.
In the illustrated embodiment, the hook and loop material HK, LP each have a generally planar configuration and the profile of the hook and loop material HK, LP is substantially similar to the profile of the under side of the interfacing structure, e.g., elongated or elliptical ring shape.
As illustrated, the inner and outer edges of the hook and loop material substantially align with inner and outer edges of the under side of the foam interface 180. That is, the perimeter boundaries of the hook and loop material may be matched to the edges of the under side geometry profile of the interface, e.g., for ease of manufacture.
However, other suitable perimeter boundaries are possible. For example, the coverage of the hook and loop material on the under side of the interfacing structure may be matched, internal, or external to the inner and outer edges of the under side geometry profile. In an embodiment, the hook and loop material may be internal to the outer edge of the under side to prevent contact of the hook and loop material with the patient's top lip in use.
The hook and loop type attachment mechanism may have other suitable arrangements. For example, the hook and loop materials may provide a planar configuration such as that described above, but without a sealing lip. In another exemplary embodiment, the hook and loop materials may provide a curvature along a first direction. In another exemplary embodiment, the hook and loop materials may provide a curvature along a first direction and a sealing lip such as that described above. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the hook and loop materials may provide curvature along two or more directions, e.g., saddle shape over centering action.
2.12.3 Snap-over Low Retention
As shown in
2.12.4 Snap-over with PSA
In another embodiment, an under-the-nose interface or foam interface may be joined to a frame by a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA).
The under-the-nose interface 480 would be assembled in a similar manner as that shown in
2.12.5 Snap-over with Groove or Undercut
In an alternative embodiment, the under-the-nose interface may provide a composite snap-over arrangement. For example,
In yet another embodiment, the attachment mechanism may be structured to allow the foam of the interface to be received into a receiving channel in the frame or shell. The seal and retention in this case relies upon the interference fit between the foam and the channel in the frame or shell. The very soft interfacing foam is preferably laminated or otherwise joined to a harder and more dense foam (or other structure) that results in a greater interference force when engaged with the channel.
In another embodiment, the attachment mechanism can be achieved through a rigid or semi-rigid component adhered to the underside of the soft interfacing foam. The rigid/semi-rigid component may be configured to provide a number of mechanical interference fits, e.g., clipped into/onto frame.
2.12.6 Magnetic Arrangement
In an alternative embodiment, the attachment mechanism may include a magnetic arrangement to magnetically couple the frame and the interfacing structure.
2.13 Structural Compliance
2.13.1 Background
The topography around the nose has steep gradients with sharp transitions between these gradients. For an interface to be most effective, it needs to be flush with all surfaces to achieve an interface, e.g., seal. A low resilience structure would allow the greatest comfort while still achieving an interface, e.g., textile interface. However, textile interfaces are typically very thin (e.g., less then 2 mm thick) and cannot in themselves offer the required properties to add compliance. In order for a textile interface to conform to the patient's face, a support structure is required. However, a support structure is not limited to textile interfaces, i.e., foam and silicone interfaces to name a few could benefit from a support structure as well.
2.13.2 Flexible Frame
In an embodiment, the interface may be mounted on a frame made from a flexible material, e.g., injection molded silicone frame. Each end of the frame would be attached to a respective tube 42. When pulled against the patient's face, the flexible frame can conform to the patient's face, e.g., wrap around the patient's nose without pinching.
The frame may be constructed of materials having different stiffnesses. If the frame is constructed of silicone, this arrangement may be achieved by simply using silicones with different Shore Hardnesses.
For example,
This arrangement results in side portions S having more flexibility than the center portion C of the frame 622. As shown in
2.13.3 Flexible Frame with Spring Element
In another embodiment, a flexible frame such as those described above may include a spring element to increase comfort. For example,
In an embodiment, the spring element may be a variable spring element that varies its k values across its length, e.g., see graph of
To add further compliance, a low resilience foam may be added between the spring element and the interface. For example,
2.14 Venting
In an embodiment, a breathable foam interface may provide the necessary volume of CO2 washout or venting, which may obviate the need for separate CO2 washout vents. In addition, the breathable foam interface may provide a vent silencing or diffusing feature. Thus, the breathable foam interface may provide a single component with dual purposes, e.g., sealing and venting. However, CO2 vent holes may be used in conjunction with a foam interface, e.g., because condensation may block one or more breathable portions of the breathable foam interface. The air venting from the CO2 vent holes may pass through the foam as a means of diffusing and reducing noise from the stream of venting air.
For example, the frame or support that supports the foam interface may include one or more vent holes for CO2 washout, e.g., see
Also,
Further, in an alternative embodiment, the frame or support that supports the foam interface may include one or more supplemental ports, e.g., to provide supplemental oxygen and/or collect pressure/humidity data.
2.15 Alternative Interfacing Arrangements
It should be appreciated that the interfacing structure may have other interfacing arrangements. That is, the foam interface type is merely exemplary, and the foam interface may be adapted for use with other suitable interface types, e.g., over-the-nose interface, nasal cushion, mouth, full-face, nasal prongs, etc. For example,
2.16 Foamed Silicone
In lieu of and/or in addition to using visco-elastic foam (e.g., polyurethane) as discussed above, various components of the patient interface may be constructed at least in part from a silicone that is foamed, i.e. foamed silicone. That is, one or more portions of a component may be constructed from foamed silicone or an entire component may be constructed from foamed silicone.
For example, a forehead pad for a forehead support of a patient interface includes a stalk or connector adapted to connect the forehead pad to a frame and a patient-contacting pad portion adapted to contact the patient's forehead. In an embodiment, the stalk may be constructed from a non-foamed silicone (e.g., LSR) and the patient-contacting pad portion may be constructed from a foamed silicone.
In other examples, the cushion of the patient interface and/or conduits connected to the patient interface may be partly or wholly constructed from foamed silicone.
The foamed silicone can provide respective components with different “feels” and/or different connection properties.
For example, foamed silicone may provide one or more of the following properties: lighter; appealing texture, comfort; uses less material; opaque or translucent; cleanable (e.g., if there are a sufficiently high percentage of closed cells) to make the component longer lasting and with a lower replacement frequency; softer at a given thickness or durometer; lower extensibility and tear resistance; surface properties may be altered (e.g., with a skin); impermeable to air/biological matter; permanence of sealing properties with age (e.g., oil/grease absorbance); and/or surface breathable but body impermeable.
3. Application to Known Masks
One or more aspects or features of the present invention may be adapted for use and/or incorporated into embodiments and/or components of known masks, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
3.1 Respironics' ComfortCurve™
3.1.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of Respironics' ComfortCurve™ mask to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.1.1 Foam Seal
The ComfortCurve™ mask includes a cushion constructed of a silicone material. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In such embodiment, the frame attachment mechanism or clip 1507 may be maintained as a base substrate and the foam material F may be attached to the clip 1507. This arrangement allows removable attachment of the foam cushion to the existing frame of the ComfortCurve™ mask.
In an embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the foam cushion 1504F may include multiple layers, e.g., a first layer constructed of a high density foam and a second layer constructed of a more compliant foam adapted to engage the patient's face.
In another embodiment, as shown in
3.1.2 Conduit Headgear
The ComfortCurve™ mask includes headgear constructed of a fabric-type material to maintain the mask in a desired position on the patient's face. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
3.1.3 Tube Routing
In another embodiment, as shown in
In such embodiment, a support member may be provided to the headgear to improve stability. For example, a wire member (e.g., magnesium wire) may be provided to the headgear straps that extend from the frame to top of the patient's head.
3.1.4 Soft Material on Headgear Strap
In another embodiment, as shown in
3.1.5 Inlet Tubes Attached to Cheek Pads
In another embodiment, as shown in
Also, in an embodiment, the cheek pads may be in fluid communication with the cushion such that air may pass from the inlet tubes and into both the cushion cavity and cheek pads.
3.1.6 Inlet Tubing Along Inside of Frame/Headgear
In another embodiment, the inlet tubes may extend along an inner side of the frame (e.g., adjacent the patient's face) and/or the headgear, rather than along the outer side of the patient's face.
3.1.7 Accommodate Alar and Naso-Labial Angle
In another embodiment, the cushion may be structured to accommodate the alar and naso-labial angle of the patient's nose.
3.1.8 Eliminate Cheek Pads
In another embodiment, the cheek pads may be eliminated. In such embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the rigidizer 1511, frame 1502, and inlet ports 1514 associated with inlet tubes 1508 may be integrally formed as a one-piece structure.
In another embodiment, the cheek pads may be eliminated and the frame may be extended to improve stability. For example, as shown in
3.2 Respironics OptiLife™
3.2.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of Respironics' OptiLife™ mask to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.2.1 Foam Interface
The OptiLife™ mask includes nasal pillows. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In such embodiment, the foam interface F may be provided with an adaptor having a base that supports the foam interface F and couples the foam interface F to the existing frame 1602 of the OptiLife™ mask.
3.2.2 Foam Cheek Pads
In another embodiment, as shown in
3.2.3 Side Inlet Ports
In another embodiment, as shown in
3.2.4 Collapsible Inlet Tubes
In another embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the collapsible inlet tubes 1640 may be routed through the headgear 1605, e.g., up towards the top of the patient's head.
3.2.5 Rigidizers
In another embodiment, as shown in
3.2.6 Gap-Filling Structure
In another embodiment, the mask may include structure (e.g., provided to the headgear, frame, etc.) that is adapted to fill gaps or spaces provided between the patient's face and the mask/headgear. The gap-filling structure may improve comfort and/or stability in use. For example, as shown in
3.3 Respironics' ComfortLite™ and ComfortLite™ 2
3.3.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of Respironics' ComfortLite™ and ComfortLite™ 2 masks to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.3.1 Two Tube Arrangement
In another embodiment, each mask may include two inlet tubes rather than a single inlet tube that extends over the patient's nose to the top of the patient's head. For example, as shown in
In such embodiment, one or more portions of the headgear may be eliminated such as the forehead support.
3.4 Fisher & Paykel's Opus™
3.4.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of Fisher & Paykel's Opus™ mask to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.4.1 Quick Release
The frame 1802, nasal pillows 1804, and elbow 1807 of the Opus™ mask form a sub-assembly that is coupled to the support structure 1809 via a clip arrangement. In an alternative embodiment, quick release arrangements may be provided to releasably connect the sub-assembly to the support structure. For example, the sub-assembly may be coupled to the support structure via a magnet arrangement.
In another embodiment, the sub-assembly may be coupled to the support structure in a manner that allows removal of the sub-assembly while the headgear is maintained on the patient's head.
In another embodiment, the joint between the elbow and the frame can be structured in a quick-release design, e.g., where the ball joint of the elbow can be resiliently attached/detached from the frame. This arrangement allows the frame/nasal pillows to be maintained along with the headgear on the patient's head.
As shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
3.4.2 Adjustment Mechanism
In another embodiment, an adjustment mechanism may be provided to the frame and/or nasal pillows to allow adjustment of the nasal pillows to accommodate the alar and naso-labial angle of the patient's nose.
3.4.3 Slidable Elbow/Inlet Tube
In another embodiment, the elbow and/or tube may be arranged for sliding movement relative to the frame to isolate the seal from tube drag. For example,
3.4.4 Low Profile Elbow
In another embodiment, a portion of the elbow may have a substantially oval-shaped cross-section (rather than a round cross-section) to provide the elbow with a lower profile.
3.4.5 Tube Routing
In another embodiment, the mask may include two inlet tubes rather than a single inlet tube. For example, as shown in
In such embodiments, the headgear may be eliminated or integrated with the tubes, e.g., two inlet tubes adapted to deliver breathable gas and stabilize the nasal pillows on the patient's face.
Also, the inlet tubes may be collapsible and may include one or more of the collapsible tube properties described above.
3.4.6 Foam Seal
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the foam interface may be a block of foam (e.g., reticulated foam) wherein the perimeter of the interface is sealed or relatively less permeable and the center of the interface is breathable to act as diffusing mechanism. In such embodiment, the center of the interface may have two discrete areas for each nostril.
Other foam alternatives include edible packaging foams, fibrous filter material, and foam prongs. The foam prongs may have a bell shape with a cylindrical outlet hole, and optional reinforcement may be provided to one or more portions of the foam prongs, e.g., inner walls, outer walls, etc.
In another embodiment, the silicone nasal pillows may be provided with a foam layer on a contact surface adapted to engage the patient's nose. The foam layer may be provided to the nasal pillows in any suitable manner, e.g., spray-on micro diffuse layer (e.g., HC405). The foam layer may improve comfort, feel, and/or softness, and may provide a moisture wicking feature.
3.5 Puritan Bennett's Breeze® SleepGear® DreamSeal®
3.5.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of Puritan Bennett's Breeze® SleepGear® DreamSeal® mask to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.5.1 Foam Seal
The Breeze® SleepGear® DreamSeal® mask includes a cushion constructed of a silicone material. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
3.5.2 One-Piece Tube/Head Support
The head support 1905 of the Breeze® SleepGear® Dream Seal® mask includes a metal spring 1911 that supports a cradle 1913 adapted to engage the rear the patient's head (e.g., see
3.5.3 Lower Profile
As shown in
3.5.4 Two Tube Arrangement
In another embodiment, the mask may include two inlet tubes rather than a single inlet tube. For example, as shown in
In such arrangement, a manifold 1916 may be provided at the top of the patient's head to interconnect the tubes 1908.
3.5.5 Cover or Sock
In another embodiment, one or more portions of the frame, inlet tube, and/or head support may include a cover or sock to improve aesthetics and/or comfort.
3.6 InnoMed Technologies' Nasal-Aire™
3.6.0 Improvements/Alternative Arrangements
The following embodiments describe improvements and/or alternative arrangements of InnoMed Technologies' Nasal-Aire™ mask to enhance respiratory therapy.
3.6.1 Collapsible Tubes
The inlet tubes of the Nasal-Aire™ mask are substantially non-collapsible and/or crush-resistant. In an alternative embodiment, the inlet tubes may be replaced with collapsible conduits adapted to deliver breathable gas and stabilize the nasal interface on the patient's face. The collapsible conduits may include one or more of the collapsible tube properties described above. For example, each conduit may be provided with a rigidizer and/or each conduit may have a general D-shaped cross-section.
3.6.2 Back Strap
In an embodiment, as shown in
3.6.3 Foam Seal
The Nasal-Aire™ mask includes a nasal interface constructed of a silicone material. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
3.6.4 Manifold
The manifold of the Nasal-Aire™ mask includes a relatively rigid, one-piece, plastic structure. In an alternative embodiment, the manifold may be constructed of more than one material, e.g., rigid portion and semi-rigid portion, to improve comfort and/or aesthetics.
In another embodiment, the manifold may be positioned on the patient's head, rather than hang downwardly from the patient's head.
A preferred interfacing structure according to an embodiment of the invention utilizes foam having properties as set forth in
While the invention has been described in connection with what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the various embodiments described above may be implemented in conjunction with other embodiments, e.g., aspects of one embodiment may be combined with aspects of another embodiment to realize yet other embodiments. Further, each independent feature or component of any given assembly may constitute an additional embodiment. In addition, while the invention has particular application to patients who suffer from OSA, it is to be appreciated that patients who suffer from other illnesses (e.g., congestive heart failure, diabetes, morbid obesity, stroke, barriatric surgery, etc.) can derive benefit from the above teachings. Moreover, the above teachings have applicability with patients and non-patients alike in non-medical applications.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/650,577 filed Jul. 14, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/085,191, filed Apr. 16, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,937,312), which was the U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/AU2007/001051, filed Jul. 27, 2007, which designated the U.S. and claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/833,841, filed Jul. 28, 2006, 60/874,968, filed Dec. 15, 2006, 60/924,241, filed May 4, 2007, and 60/929,393, filed Jun. 25, 2007, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 443191 | Illing | Dec 1890 | A |
| 781516 | Guthrie, Jr. | Jan 1905 | A |
| 1081745 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1913 | A |
| 1125542 | Humphries | Jan 1915 | A |
| 1192186 | Greene | Jul 1916 | A |
| 1229050 | Donald | Jun 1917 | A |
| 1282527 | Bidonde | Oct 1918 | A |
| 1362766 | McGargill | Dec 1920 | A |
| 1445010 | Feinberg | Feb 1923 | A |
| 1710160 | Gibbs | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1610793 | Kaufman | Dec 1926 | A |
| 1632449 | McKesson | Jun 1927 | A |
| 1873160 | Sturtevant | Aug 1932 | A |
| 2126755 | Dreyfus | Aug 1938 | A |
| 2130555 | Malcom | Sep 1938 | A |
| 2228218 | Schwartz | Jan 1941 | A |
| 2353643 | Bulbulian | Jul 1944 | A |
| 2376871 | Fink | May 1945 | A |
| 2415846 | Randall | Feb 1947 | A |
| 2433565 | Korman | Dec 1947 | A |
| 2578621 | Yant | Dec 1951 | A |
| 2625155 | Engelder | Jan 1953 | A |
| 2706983 | Matheson et al. | Apr 1955 | A |
| 2931356 | Schwarz | Apr 1960 | A |
| 3013556 | Galleher, Jr. | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3090046 | Bowers, Sr. | May 1963 | A |
| 3291127 | Eimer et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3330273 | Bennett | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3424633 | Corrigall et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3552778 | Muller | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3670726 | Mahon et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3682171 | Dali et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3739774 | Gregory | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3754552 | King | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3799164 | Rollins | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3850171 | Ball et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3861385 | Carden | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3865106 | Palush | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3902486 | Guichard | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3905361 | Hewson et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3938614 | Ahs | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3972321 | Proctor | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4006744 | Steer | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4142527 | Garcia | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4153051 | Shippert | May 1979 | A |
| 4156426 | Gold | May 1979 | A |
| 4248218 | Fischer | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4258710 | Reber | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4263908 | Mizerak | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4264743 | Maruyama et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4266540 | Panzik et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4267845 | Robertson, Jr. et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4273124 | Zimmerman | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4312359 | Olson | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4347205 | Stewart | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4367735 | Dali | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4367816 | Wilkes | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4406283 | Bir | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4414973 | Matheson et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4422456 | Tiep | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4437463 | Ackerman | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4449526 | Elam | May 1984 | A |
| 4454880 | Muto et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4455675 | Bose et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4463755 | Suzuki | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4493614 | Chu et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4548200 | Wapner | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549542 | Chien | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4572323 | Randall | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4579113 | McCreadie et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587967 | Chu et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4601465 | Roy | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4617637 | Chu et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4630604 | Montesi | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4641647 | Behan | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4648398 | Agdanowski et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4660555 | Payton | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4671271 | Bishop et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4676241 | Webb et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4699139 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4706664 | Snook et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4711636 | Bierman | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4713844 | Westgate | Dec 1987 | A |
| D293613 | Wingler | Jan 1988 | S |
| 4753233 | Grimes | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4767411 | Edmunds | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774946 | Ackerman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782832 | Trimble et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790829 | Bowden et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4802857 | Laughlin | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4803981 | Vickery | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809692 | Nowacki et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4811730 | Milano | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4830138 | Palmaer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4838878 | Kalt et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4878491 | McGilvray, III | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4899740 | Napolitano | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4907584 | McGinnis | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4915105 | Lee | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919128 | Kopala et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919654 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4944310 | Sullivan | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945907 | Tayebi | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4949733 | Sampson | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4960121 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4966590 | Kalt | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4971051 | Toffoon | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4976698 | Stokley | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4989599 | Carter | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996983 | AmRhein | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5000173 | Zalkin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5005571 | Dietz | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5018519 | Brown | May 1991 | A |
| 5020163 | Aileo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5022900 | Bar-Yona et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5023955 | Murphy, II et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025805 | Nutter | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5038772 | Kolbe et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042478 | Kopala et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046491 | Derrick | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5062421 | Burns et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5065756 | Rapoport | Nov 1991 | A |
| D322318 | Sullivan | Dec 1991 | S |
| 5074297 | Venegas | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5113857 | Dickerman et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5117818 | Palify | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5117819 | Servidio et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5121745 | Israel | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5127397 | Kohnke | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137017 | Salter | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5138722 | Urella et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5148802 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5155863 | Roberts | Oct 1992 | A |
| D333015 | Farmer et al. | Feb 1993 | S |
| 5188101 | Tumolo | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5207665 | Davis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5217391 | Fisher, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220699 | Farris | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5233978 | Callaway | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243709 | Sheehan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5243971 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5245995 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263939 | Wortrich | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265592 | Beaussant | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265595 | Rudolph | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267557 | Her-Mou | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5269296 | Landis | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5271391 | Graves | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5299599 | Farmer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304146 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5335656 | Bowe et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5349949 | Schegerin | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355878 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355893 | Mick et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364367 | Banks et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372130 | Stern et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372388 | Gargiulo | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372389 | Tam et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372390 | Conway et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372391 | Bast et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5375393 | Baker et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5385141 | Granatiero | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394568 | Brostrom et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5396885 | Nelson | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398676 | Press et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400776 | Bartholomew | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5419318 | Tayebi | May 1995 | A |
| 5425359 | Liou | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429683 | Le Mitouard | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437267 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441046 | Starr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5462528 | Roewer | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5477852 | Landis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5488948 | Dubruille et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5509409 | Weatherholt | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513634 | Jackson | May 1996 | A |
| 5513635 | Bedi | May 1996 | A |
| 5526806 | Sansoni | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5533506 | Wood | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538000 | Rudolph | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538001 | Bridges | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5560354 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570684 | Behr | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5592938 | Scarberry et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5623923 | Bertheau et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5647357 | Barnett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5647358 | Vilasi | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653228 | Byrd | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655527 | Scarberry et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5657752 | Landis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662101 | Ogden et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5682881 | Winthrop et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5704345 | Berthon-Jones | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707342 | Tanaka | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5724965 | Handke et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735272 | Dillon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740799 | Nielsen | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746201 | Kidd | May 1998 | A |
| 5752510 | Goldstein | May 1998 | A |
| 5752511 | Simmons et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5765557 | Warters | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5794619 | Edelman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807341 | Heim | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5842469 | Rapp et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5906203 | KlockSeth et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5918598 | Belfer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5921239 | McCall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937851 | Serowski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954049 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966745 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975079 | Hellings et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012455 | Goldstein | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016804 | Gleason et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019101 | Cotner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026811 | Settle | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044844 | Kwok et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6082360 | Rudolph et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086118 | McNaughton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095996 | Steer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6098205 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6109263 | Feuchtgruber | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112746 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119693 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119694 | Correa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123071 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123082 | Berthon-Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139787 | Harrison | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6152137 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6192886 | Rudolph | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193914 | Harrison | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196223 | Belfer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211263 | Cinelli et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231548 | Bassett | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241930 | Harrison | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247470 | Ketchedjian | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258066 | Urich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6295366 | Haller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6328038 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6341606 | Bordewick et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347631 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357440 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6357441 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358279 | Tahi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6374826 | Gunaratnam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6412487 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412488 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412593 | Jones | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6419660 | Russo | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6422238 | Lithgow | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423036 | Van Huizen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6431172 | Bordewick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434796 | Speirs | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6435181 | Jones, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6439234 | Curti et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6448303 | Paul | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457473 | Brostrom et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467482 | Boussignac | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467483 | Kopacko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470887 | Martinez | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478026 | Wood | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482178 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491034 | Gunaratnam et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6513526 | Kwok et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6530373 | Patron et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532961 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6536435 | Fecteau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6561188 | Ellis | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561190 | Kwok | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561191 | Kwok | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561192 | Palmer | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6561193 | Noble | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571798 | Thornton | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579267 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581594 | Drew et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6581601 | Ziaee | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581602 | Kwok et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584975 | Taylor | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6584976 | Japuntich et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6595214 | Hecker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595215 | Wood | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6607516 | Cinelli et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6615832 | Chen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6627289 | Dilnik et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631718 | Lovell | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6634358 | Kwok et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6637434 | Noble | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6644315 | Ziaee | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655385 | Curti et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6663600 | Bierman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669712 | Cardoso | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| D485905 | Moore et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
| 6679257 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6679265 | Strickland et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6684882 | Morine | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691707 | Gunaratnam et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6698427 | Clowers | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6701927 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710099 | Cinelli et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6766800 | Chu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6776162 | Wood | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6776163 | Dougill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6789543 | Cannon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796308 | Gunaratnam et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805117 | Ho et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6807967 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6817362 | Gélinas et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6820617 | Robertson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823865 | Drew et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823869 | Raje et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834650 | Fini et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6851425 | Jaffre et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860270 | Sniadach | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| D505489 | Sleeper | May 2005 | S |
| 6895965 | Scarberry et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6907882 | Ging et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6918404 | Dias da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926004 | Schumacher | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6938620 | Payne, Jr. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6968844 | Liland et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6972003 | Bierman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6981503 | Shapiro | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6986352 | Frater et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6997177 | Wood | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007696 | Palkon et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7011090 | Drew et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018362 | Bierman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7052127 | Harrison | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7066586 | da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076282 | Munro et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080645 | Genger et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7086422 | Huber et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7101359 | Kline et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7104491 | Vinding | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107989 | Frater et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7146976 | McKown | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152599 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152601 | Barakat et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152602 | Bateman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7178525 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7178528 | Lau et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7191781 | Wood | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7207328 | Altemus | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7210481 | Lovell et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7219669 | Lovell et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7237551 | Ho et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7243723 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| D550836 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
| D552733 | Criscuolo et al. | Oct 2007 | S |
| 7285255 | Kadlec et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7302950 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7318437 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7353827 | Geist | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7357136 | Ho et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7481221 | Kulik et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7523754 | Lithgow et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7658189 | Davidson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7827990 | Melidis et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 8025058 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8297285 | Henry et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8443807 | McAuley et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8479741 | McAuley et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8701667 | Ho et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8714157 | McAuley et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8944061 | D'Souza et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8950404 | Formica et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8960196 | Henry | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9027556 | Ng et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9119931 | D'Souza et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9242062 | Melidis et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9333315 | McAuley et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9381316 | Ng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9517317 | McAuley et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9539405 | McAuley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9907922 | Stephenson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9907923 | Stephenson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9974914 | McAuley et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 20010015204 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010020474 | Hecker et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010042547 | McDonald et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020005198 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020416 | Namey | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020023647 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029780 | Frater et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046755 | De Voss | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053347 | Ziaee | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066452 | Kessler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069872 | Gradon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096173 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096178 | Ziaee | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117177 | Kwok | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124849 | Billette De Villemeur et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143296 | Russo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157673 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162556 | Smith et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174868 | Kwok et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020185134 | Bishop | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000526 | Gobel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030019495 | Palkon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030029454 | Gelinas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075176 | Fukunaga et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079749 | Strickland et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079751 | Kwok et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089373 | Gradon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111080 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030116160 | Kwok et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154980 | Berthon-Jones | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164170 | Drew et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168063 | Gambone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196655 | Ging et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196656 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196658 | Ging et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040025882 | Madaus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025885 | Payne, Jr. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040041342 | Frieman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045551 | Eaton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065328 | Amarasinghe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067333 | Amarasinghe | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106891 | Langan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111104 | Schein et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112384 | Lithgow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118406 | Lithgow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127856 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149280 | Semeniuk | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182398 | Sprinkle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211428 | Jones, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221850 | Ging et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226564 | Persson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226566 | Gunaratnam | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255949 | Lang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001152 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050011523 | Aylsworth et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050011524 | Thomlinson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025816 | Tanaka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028822 | Sleeper et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033247 | Thompson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039757 | Wood | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050051171 | Booth | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050051176 | Riggins | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056286 | Huddart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050061326 | Payne, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066976 | Wondka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050092326 | Drew et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101933 | Marrs et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150495 | Rittner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150498 | McDonald | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155604 | Ging et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050199239 | Lang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050199242 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205096 | Matula, Jr. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211252 | Lang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241644 | Gunaratnam et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284481 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060042629 | Geist | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060060200 | Ho et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081250 | Bordewick et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095008 | Lampropoulos et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095009 | Lampropoulos et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060118117 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124131 | Chandran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137690 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174887 | Chandran et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174889 | Noble | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060180151 | Rinaldi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060201514 | Jones et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207597 | Wright | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231103 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237017 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060249212 | Huber et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272646 | Ho et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060283461 | Lubke et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070023044 | Kwok et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044804 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045152 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074723 | Coury et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101998 | Kwok et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125387 | Zollinger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144525 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070175480 | Gradon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186930 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246043 | Kwok et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272249 | Chandran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282272 | Bannon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000477 | Huster et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080004573 | Kaufmann et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080006277 | Worboys et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080047560 | Veliss et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060649 | Veliss et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065022 | Kyvik et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110464 | Davidson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110469 | Weinberg | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200880 | Kyvik et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080257354 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090014007 | Brambilla et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044808 | Guney et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090217929 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000534 | Kooij et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100018534 | Veliss et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100236552 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110072553 | Ho | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20140083430 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20190134333 | Kwok et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190134334 | Kwok et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190151589 | Kwok et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199651130 | Oct 1996 | AU |
| 712236 | Aug 1998 | AU |
| 2004 308536 | Dec 2004 | AU |
| 2005 232 337 | Oct 2005 | AU |
| 2005100738 | Nov 2005 | AU |
| 1688269 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 185017 | May 1907 | DE |
| 3011900 | Oct 1980 | DE |
| 146 688 | Feb 1981 | DE |
| 37 19 009 | Dec 1988 | DE |
| 39 27 038 | Feb 1991 | DE |
| 297 23 101 | Jul 1998 | DE |
| 197 03 526 | Aug 1998 | DE |
| 199 44 242 | Mar 2001 | DE |
| 100 02 571 | Jul 2001 | DE |
| 102 13 905 | Oct 2002 | DE |
| 10 2004 055 433.1 | Nov 2004 | DE |
| 0288937 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0427474 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0 466 960 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 303 090 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 658 356 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0697225 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 0 776 679 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 1027905 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 099 452 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1149603 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1 258 266 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1314445 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1396277 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1 481 702 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1 529 505 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1 637 175 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1 696 989 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 2 720 280 | Dec 1995 | FR |
| 532214 | Jan 1941 | GB |
| 2 176 404 | Dec 1986 | GB |
| 2 368 533 | May 2002 | GB |
| 2 385 533 | Aug 2003 | GB |
| 52-47455 | Apr 1977 | JP |
| H02-249558 | Oct 1990 | JP |
| H05-33742 | May 1993 | JP |
| H10-508786 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11-332391 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2001-327615 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002-102352 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002-525179 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002-527155 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002-540859 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003-501220 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003-135600 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003-325629 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004-570 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 3102973 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2005-13492 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005-40589 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005-529687 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2006-505373 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006-518231 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2008-136826 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| WO 1982003548 | Oct 1982 | WO |
| WO 1987001950 | Apr 1987 | WO |
| WO 1992020392 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 1992020395 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 1996028207 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO 1997009090 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 1998004310 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998012965 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998023305 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998024499 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 1999016327 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999025410 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999043375 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999061088 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 2000018457 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000020072 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000038772 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 0050122 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000050121 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000059567 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000069521 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000072905 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000074758 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000076568 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000078384 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0132250 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001062326 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001095965 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001097892 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001097893 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002038221 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002045784 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002047749 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| PCTAU2003000458 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003090827 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003105921 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004022146 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004022147 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004041341 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004041342 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004073778 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004078230 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005021075 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005051468 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005053781 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063328 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005076874 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005079726 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005086943 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005099801 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| PCTAU2005000704 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| PCTAU2005100738 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005110220 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005118040 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005123166 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000031 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006000046 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000417 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| PCTAU2005001941 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006069475 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074513 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074515 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074516 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074517 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000321 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099658 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006130903 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007006089 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007009182 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007014088 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041751 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041786 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007045008 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007048174 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007053878 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007104042 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| PCTAU2007001936 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007143772 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007145534 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007147088 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008007985 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008011682 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008011683 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008030831 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008040050 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008068966 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008070929 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| PCTAU2008906390 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| PCTAU2009900327 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009026627 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009052560 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009059353 | May 2009 | WO |
| PCTAU2009902731 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| PCTAU2009904236 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009108994 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009109004 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010028425 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010066004 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011110962 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011110962 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/385,701, filed Mar. 2003, Berthon-Jones et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,928, filed Jun. 2006, Berthon-Jones et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/584,711, filed Dec. 2004, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,622, filed Sep. 2003, Lithgow et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,929, filed Jan. 2008, Gunaratnam et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/871,929, filed Feb. 2004, Surjaatmadja et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/080,446, filed Jul. 2005, Ging et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,295, filed Jun. 2006, Lubeke et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/474,415, filed Jun. 2006, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/491,016, filed Feb. 2007, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/597,909, filed Jul. 2007, Worboys. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/703,082, filed Feb. 2007, Davidson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/878,932, filed Jul. 2007, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/081,696, filed Apr. 2008, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/219,852, filed Jul. 2008, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/309,696, filed Jan. 2009, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/382,517, filed Mar. 2009, Lithgow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250, filed Jun. 2009, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/461,448, filed Aug. 2009, Berthon-Jones. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,537, filed Jun. 2009, Kooij et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/656,466, filed Jan. 2010, Biener et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/700,878, filed Feb. 2010, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/634,802, filed Dec. 2004, Chandran. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/645,672, filed Jan. 2005, Chandran |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/795,615, filed Apr. 2006, Judson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/833,841, filed Jul. 2006, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/835,442, filed Aug. 2006, Selvarajan et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/852,649, filed Oct. 2006, Selvarajan et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/907,856, filed Apr. 2007, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/935,179, filed Jul. 2007, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/935,336, filed Aug. 2007, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/996,160, filed Nov. 2007, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/006,409, filed Jan. 2008, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/064,818, filed Mar. 2008, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/071,512, filed May 2008, Guney et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/213,326, filed May 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/222,711, filed Jul. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/272,162, filed Aug. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/263,175, filed Nov. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/272,250, filed Sep. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| “Ear Loop Face Mask”. |
| “If You Hate CPAP! You Need CPAP Pro,” www.cpappro.com. |
| A Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jan. 8, 2018, in a corresponding European Patent Application No. 16 165 900.8 (5 pages). |
| A Decision of Rejection dated Apr. 27, 2018, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-181474 (3 pages), and an English translation thereof (5 pages). |
| A First Examination Report dated Dec. 4, 2017, in a corresponding New Zealand Patent Application No. 736962 (4 pages). |
| A First Examination Report dated Jan. 8, 2018, in related New Zealand Patent Application No. 738046 (2 pages). |
| A First Office Action issued in corresponding European Application No. 16165900.8, dated Aug. 21, 2018, (5 pages). |
| A Further Examination Report issued in related New Zealand Application No. 738046, dated Jun. 8, 2018, (1 page). |
| A Further Examination Report dated Mar. 5, 2018, in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 736962 (3 pages). |
| A Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016 in a related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 (21 pages). |
| A Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Jan. 17, 2018, in a related Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-036117 (2 pages), and an English translation thereof (3 pages). |
| A Second Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 in a corresponding Chinese Application No. 201310138927.7 (9 pages), and an English translation thereof (12 pages). |
| A Second Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2016 in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-157403 (4 pages), and an English translation thereof (6 pages). |
| A Third Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2017, in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-157403 (2 pages), and an English translation thereof (2 pages). |
| ACP Composites—Large Stock of Ready to Use Composite Plate, Tube, Sheet, Fabrics and Core Materials, https://www.acpsakes.com/Core-Materials-nd-Foam.html, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Adam J. Singer MD et 1. “The Cyanoacrylate Topical Skin Adhesives,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 26, 2008, pp. 490-496. |
| An Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2017 in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2014-198231 (2 pages), and an English translation thereof. |
| An Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017, in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2016-181474 (5 pages), and an English translation thereof (6 pages). |
| ComfortLite 2, Resporonics, http://comfortlite2.respironics.com. |
| ComfortLite, Resporonics, http://comfortlite.respironics.com. |
| Communication dated Nov. 12, 2014 issued in corresponding European Application No. 12165188.9 (7 pages). |
| Communication dated Nov. 4, 2014 issued in corresponding European Application No. 12165191.3 (5 pages). |
| Communication enclosing and Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2016 in a related European Application No. 16155760.8-1662 (10 pages). |
| Communication enclosing the Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 17, 2017 in a corresponding European Application No. EP 161659008 (7 pages). |
| Communication issued in a corresponding European Application No. 11 191 110.3 dated Feb. 15, 2013. |
| Communication issued in a corresponding European Application No. 11 191 107.9 dated Feb. 28, 2013. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in a corresponding European Patent Application No. 07 784 696.2-1662 in Jul. 17, 2013. |
| Deadline for Counterstatement dated Feb. 1, 2017 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 702644 (2 pages), forwarding an Amended Notice of Opposition to Grant of Patent (Section 21) (2 pages) and a Statement of Case (13 pages). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Apr. 27, 2015 in a related Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-166104, with English Translation thereof (8 pages). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 10, 2015 in a related Japanese Application No. 2013-218972 (4 pages) and English translation thereof (3 pages). |
| Decision of Rejection issued in a corresponding Japanese Appl. No. 2009-521069 with English translation thereof (dated Apr. 2, 2013). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 3, 2014 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-540550 (English language version only). |
| Decision of Rejection dated May 16, 2016 in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2014-198231 (2 pages) and an English translation thereof (2 pages). |
| EP Supplementary Search Report issued in EP Application 03793493, dated Dec. 2, 2009. |
| European extended Search Report issued in related EP Appln. No. 11191110.3-2320 (dated Feb. 9, 2012). |
| European extended Search Report issued in related EP Appln. No. 1119119.9-2320 (dated Feb. 6, 2012). |
| European Search Report filed on Jul. 27, 2009 in EP Application No. 07784697.0. |
| European Search Report issued in EP 07845378.4, dated Dec. 1, 2009. |
| Examination Report filed in New Zealand Application 539836, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
| Examination Report issued in related New Zealand Appln. No. 596570 (dated Nov. 29, 2011). |
| Examiner's First Report issued in a related NZ Application No. 2007278766 (dated May 18, 2012). |
| Examiner's Report No. 3 dated Nov. 18, 2009 in New Zealand Application No. 2003275762. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2009 in European Application No. EP 08161249. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2009 in corresponding EP Application No. 09161984.1. |
| Extended European Search Report. Application No. EP 08154854, dated Nov. 27, 2008. |
| Final Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 dated Feb. 4, 2014. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2015 in a related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 (19 pages). |
| First Examination Report dated Dec. 19, 2014 in corresponding New Zealand Patent Application No. 702644. |
| First Examination Report issued in related New Zealand Patent Application No. 615330 dated Sep. 30, 2013. |
| First Examination Report dated Jun. 30, 2016 in a related New Zealand Application No. 721025 (2 pages). |
| First Office Action dated May 18, 2015 in a related Japanese application No. 2014-13753, and English translation thereof (11 pages) listing JP 2002-540859 (WO 00/59567 is a corresponding English language document). |
| Fisher and Paykel Col.—Product Family—http://www.fphcare.com/osa/products.asp/. |
| Flexifit instructions, http://web.archive.org/web/l 9970126045828/http:/www.archive.org/ dated Jan. 26, 1997, Affidavit of Christopher Butler dated Sep. 6, 2016, 23 pages. |
| Fourth Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2015, in a related Chinese Application No. 201210210669.4 (8 pages) and an English translation thereof (13 pages). |
| Further Examination Report dated Sep. 23, 2014 issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 610755 (2 pages). |
| Further Examination Report dated Dec. 18, 2014 in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 610755. |
| Guidelines for Sandwich Core Materials, http://fibreglast.com/product/guidelines-for-sandwich-core-materials/Learning_Center, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Hans Rudolph, Inc.—Mask Products—http://www.rudolphke.com/products.php?category MASKS. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/AU2004/001832, dated Jul. 3, 2006. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2004/001832, dated Mar. 24, 2005. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2005/000803, dated Jun. 30, 2005. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2006/000770, dated Aug. 3, 2006. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2006/001051, dated Nov. 5, 2007. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2007/001052, dated Oct. 9, 2007. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2007/001936, dated Mar. 4, 2008. |
| International Search Report PCT/ AU2009/000262, dated Jun. 9, 2009. |
| International Search Report PCT/ AU2009/001144, dated Dec. 18, 2009. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2003/001471, dated Feb. 12, 2004. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2009/000240, dated May 21, 2009. |
| Joel W. Beam, “Tissue Adhesives for Simple Traumatic Lacerations,” Journal of Athletic Training, 2008, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 222-224. |
| Malloy, Plastic Part Design for Injection Molding, New York: Hanser Publishers, 1994, 14 pages. |
| Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary definition of moveable from the 14th century. |
| Non-final Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 dated Jul. 15, 2013. |
| Non-final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 dated Apr. 7, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2015 in a related Japanese Application No. 2013-118615 (3 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2016 in a related Japanese Application No. 2014-137593 (3 pages). |
| Notice of Opposition filed Oct. 25, 2016 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 702644 (3 pages). |
| Notification of the First Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2015 issued in a related Chinese application No. 2013103088382 with English translation (14 pages). |
| Notification of the First Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2015 issued in the corresponding Chinese application No. 201310138927.7 with English translation (20 pages). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2016 in a related U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250 (17 pages). |
| Office Action issued in a related Japanese Appl. No. 2009-521069 (dated May 22, 2012) with English translation thereof. |
| Office Action issued in a related Japanese Appl. No. 2009-540550 with English translation thereof (dated Feb. 12, 2013). |
| Office Action issued in European Appln. No. 07 784 696.2 (dated Sep. 16, 2010). |
| Office Action issued in related Chinese Appln. No. 200780028071.0 (dated Jul. 29, 2011) w/English translation. |
| Office Action issued in related European Appln. No. 07784696.2 (dated Sep. 28, 2011). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2014 in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-157403 with English-language translation thereof. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2014 in related Japanese Application No. 2013-166104 with English-language translation thereof. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2015 in a corresponding Japanese Application No. 2014-198231 (4 pages) and English translation thereof (5 pages). |
| Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 in European Appln. No. 04802133.1. |
| Opus Brochure, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, www.fphcare.com, 2 pages. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Dec. 22, 2014 issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2014201200 (6 pages). |
| ResMed Co.—Mask Products—http://resmed.com/portal/site/ResMedUS/index.jsp?. . . . |
| ResMed Mask Frames, Nasal Cushions and Headgear, http://web.archive.org/web/19970 1 26045828 /http ://www.a rchive.org/ dated Jan. 26, 1997, Affidavit of Christopher Butler dated Jul. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
| ResMed Mirage Swift Nasal Pillows System, www.resmed.com, 2004, 6 pages. |
| ResMed Mirage Vista Nasal Mask-Component Cards, www.resmed.com Reference No. 1010279/30502, dated 2005, 1 page. |
| ResMed Origins Brochure dated Apr. 17, 2016, 64 pages. |
| Respironics Co.—Mask Family—http://masksfamily.respironics.com/. |
| Second Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2015 in a related Japanese Application No. 2013-118615 (3 pages) and English translation thereof (4 pages). |
| Second Office Action issued in a related Chinese Appl. No. 200780028071.0 (dated May 30, 2012) with English translation thereof. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2016 in a related Chinese Application No. 201310308838.2 (6 pages) and an English translation thereof (8 pages). |
| Second Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016 in a related Japanese Application No. 2013-157403 (4 pages), and an English translation thereof (7 pages). |
| Second Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2015 in a related Japanese Application No. 2013-166104 (2 pages) and an English translation thereof (2 pages). |
| Snapp Nasal Interface, Tiara Medical Systems, Inc.—http://www.tiaramed.com/asp_shops/shopdisplayproducts.asp?id=109&cat=SNAPP%2A+Nasal+Interface. |
| Subbu Venkatraman et al., “Review Skin Adhesives and Skin Adhesion 1. Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems,” Biomaterials, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 1119-1136. |
| Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC dated Dec. 9, 2014 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 11 191 110.3. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2009 in European Application 2009 No. 03810331.3. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2009 in European Appln. No. 04802133.1. |
| Supplementary Search Report issued in European Appln. No. 05746824.1, dated Dec. 17, 2009. |
| Third Office Actin dated Oct. 5, 2015 in a related Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-540550 (4 pages), and English Translation thereof (4 pages). |
| Third Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2016 in a corresponding Chinese Application No. 201310138927.7 (10 pages), and an English translation thereof (12 pages). |
| Ultra Mirage Full Face Mask brochure, http://web.archive.org/web/19970126045828/http://www.archive.org/ dated Jan. 26, 1997, Affidavit of Christopher Butler dated Sep. 6, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Unsolicited email from Elson Silva, PhD, dated Mar. 28, 2008, “Requesting IDS of U.S. Pat. No. 6,766,817 for patents on fluids moving on porosity by Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow,” (email provided in both HTML and plain text format). |
| Users Guide ResMed Mirage Swift Nasal Pillows System, www.myresmed.com dated May 6, 2004, 11 pages. |
| Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition 1988, definition for engaged and flexible. |
| Webster's Third New International Dictionary, 1993, Dictionary definition for adjustable, bendable, and mild steel. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/424,686, Lithgow et al., filed Nov. 8, 2002. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/483,622, Kwok et al., filed Jul. 1, 2003. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/533,214, Drew, filed Dec. 2003. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190134332 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60833841 | Jul 2006 | US | |
| 60874968 | Dec 2006 | US | |
| 60924241 | May 2007 | US | |
| 60929393 | Jun 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15650577 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16235620 | US | |
| Parent | 12085191 | US | |
| Child | 15650577 | US |
