This application is a U.S. national stage application under 35 USC §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/064036, filed Oct. 17, 2008, which claims priority to U.K. Patent Application No. 0720327.6, filed Oct. 17, 2007, and U.K. Patent Application No. 0808454.3, filed May 9, 2008, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety into this application.
This invention relates to a delivery system for a self-expanding device for placement in a bodily lumen, the system comprising a sheath that confines the device to a radially compact delivery disposition until the device is to be released into the lumen.
The invention also relates to a catheter delivery system for introducing and placing an endoprosthesis in a human or animal body. The catheter delivery system comprises a region in which to receive the endoprosthesis, an elongate sheath to surround the endoprosthesis in the region and a device for splitting the sheath along its length, to release the endoprosthesis from the region.
Catheter delivery systems are commonly used to introduce self-expanding endoprostheses in human or animal bodies and to advance them to the clogged or narrowed area. In the delivery system, the elongate endoprosthesis is held in a radially compressed state by a surrounding sheath to facilitate a smooth delivery. When the endoprosthesis has been placed in the destined area, it is expanded by withdrawing or opening up the sheath.
A catheter delivery system where the endoprosthesis is expanded by cutting open the sheath is disclosed in FR 2688688. In this system, three cutting wires are arranged equidistantly around the periphery of the endoprosthesis. Each wire runs from a proximal end of the catheter to a distal end, with the wire placed between the radially compressed endoprosthesis and the sheath in the region where the endoprosthesis is received, leaves the sheath at its distal end and runs back to the proximal catheter end along the outside of the sheath, so as to form a loop around the sheath wall. Both parts of the wires, in- and outside the sheath, are guided parallel to one another and the overall six proximal wire ends are attached to a handle at the proximal end of the catheter. The sheath is opened by pulling the handle so that the distal ends of the three wire loops move proximally and cut through the wall of the sheath. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,769 is similar.
A catheter delivery system that uses only one cutting wire is disclosed in WO-A-01/08599 of Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG. The wire consists of an inner pull element, running within the sheath, an outer pull element, running outside the sheath, and a separating element, located between the distal ends of the two pull elements at the distal end of the sheath. In order to expand the endoprosthesis, both pull elements are simultaneously pulled in a proximal direction, so that the separating element moves along the endoprosthesis towards the proximal catheter end and cuts through the sheath wall. The disclosure of EP-A-732087 is similar, and expresses a preference for polyethylene-terephthalate as material for the body of the sheath because it tears easily after being notched. The disclosed system is a balloon catheter with a collar from which the sheath extends distally and a strand extends proximally. Pulling on the strand pulls the split sheath proximally away from the stent.
In known catheter delivery systems that use a cutting mechanism to open up the sheath, the cut open sheath is trapped between the expanded endoprosthesis and the wall of the vessel, once the expansion process is finished. To remove the sheath from the patient's body, it has to be pulled out from its proximal end. For the case of relatively large endoprostheses, such as oesophagus stents, where sheaths with thick walls can be used, this procedure is normally uncomplicated. However, problems arise when small-sized endoprostheses are required, for example to widen narrow blood vessels. In this case, the profile of the distal catheter end, comprising the endoprosthesis to be deployed, has to be strongly reduced, in order to facilitate accurate placement of the endoprosthesis and thus sheaths with thin walls have to be used. When such a thin-walled, cut open sheath is removed from the patient's body by pulling from its proximal end, the friction generated by the abluminal surface of the expanded endoprosthesis and the luminal surface of the vessel may cause either the sheath to tear, inhibiting its complete removal, or the endoprosthesis to move proximally with the sheath being pulled away from the axial position in the bodily lumen where it ought to be. Similar friction problems may arise even in traditional deployment methods, where an unslitted sheath is withdrawn from the endoprosthesis in the expansion process. When pulled from the proximal end, a thin-walled sheath may stretch along the direction of the pull, leading to a decrease of its radial diameter. This increases the friction caused between sheath and endoprosthesis, requiring a larger pulling force to move the sheath, similar to the known concept of the “Chinese finger trap”. Eventually, the sheath may tear or the endoprosthesis may move away from the desired position.
Also belonging to the state of the art is WO2004/066809, Gore, which suggests to use a deployment line that is integral with a pull back sheath, to release an endoluminal device from inside the sheath.
WO98/20812 Cook, Inc. discloses a splittable sleeve stent deployment device in several embodiments, in one of which an enlarged diameter distal shaft portion is withdrawn proximally through the lumen of the stent to burst a sleeve surrounding the stent. In another embodiment, the sleeve continues distally into a partial sleeve segment that is folded back inside the sleeve to end in a graspable proximal end proximal of the stent. Pulling proximally on this end can have the effect of splitting the sleeve to release the stent. The sleeve can be made from molecular oriented PTFE.
US2006/0089627 is another disclosure of a stent within a sleeve that is parted by a device that moves proximally along the length of the sleeve. The device can be a cutter or an enlarged diameter bursting element that moves through the lumen of the stent to rupture the sleeve progressively.
EP-A-1679095 proposes a PTFE material, longitudinally drawn, for a sheath over a stent that itself overlies a PET balloon of a balloon catheter delivery vehicle for the stent. Inflation of the balloon ruptures the sheath. The ruptured sheath is pulled from its location between the stented bodily tissue and the abluminal surface of the stent when the catheter is pulled proximally away from the site of stenting and the stent placed there.
A main objective of the invention is to provide a catheter delivery system, where the sheath surrounding the endoprosthesis can be easily and reliably removed. In another objective, the invention aims to provide a catheter delivery system with a simplified sheath splitting mechanism that reduces the risk of damage to the body tissue when the sheath is cut open.
The invention provides a catheter delivery system for introducing and placing an elongate endoprosthesis in a human or animal body. The catheter delivery system has a proximal end and a distal end and comprises an elongate region at the distal end, in which to receive the endoprosthesis, an elongate sheath to surround the endoprosthesis in the region, and a device for splitting the sheath along its length, to release the endoprosthesis from the region where the endoprosthesis is received. The device for splitting the sheath comprises a first pull element with a proximal end at the proximal end of the delivery system and a distal end, comprising a splitting section for splitting the sheath. The first pull element extends to a distal end of the sheath at a distal end of the delivery system and can be pulled along the length of the sheath from the proximal end of the catheter delivery system. Further, the catheter delivery system comprises a second pull element that pulls the distal end of the sheath proximally during the movement of the first pull element along the length of the sheath. When the first pull element is pulled from the proximal end of the catheter delivery system, the splitting section moves from an original position at the distal end of the sheath towards the proximal catheter delivery system end, thereby splitting the sheath along its length. During this movement of the splitting section, the endoprosthesis expands from a radially compressed state to a radially expanded state in the region where the sheath has already been split. While the splitting section is opening up the sheath, the second pull element pulls the distal sheath end towards the proximal end of the catheter delivery system, thereby removing the sheath from the region where the endoprosthesis has expanded. Once the sheath is fully split, it can be completely removed from the distal end of the catheter delivery system, using the second pull element, and subsequently taken out of the patient's body. The force exerted by the second pull element onto the sheath during the sheath removal process acts on the distal sheath end, so that stretching of the sheath along the pull direction (which may occur when the sheath is pulled from its proximal end) is avoided. Furthermore, when the sheath is starting to be removed, the endoprosthesis has only partly expanded. Thus, the area where the sheath is pushed against the vessel wall by the expanded endoprosthesis is smaller than for the case of a fully expanded endoprosthesis. This leads to a reduction of the frictional forces that have to be overcome in order to move the sheath. Hence, the force required to pull out the sheath is reduced, simplifying the removal process, and the sheath is exposed to a significantly lower level of stress. This is particularly important for the case of thin-walled sheaths, used for deployment of small endoprostheses in narrow blood vessels etc., that may easily stretch or tear, rendering a complete removal impossible or causing undesired movement of the endoprosthesis.
In a preferred embodiment, the first pull element is a wire. In this way, the pull element can be made with small lateral dimensions, so as to keep a reduced profile of the distal catheter delivery system end and sufficiently stable to avoid deformation or breakage when a pulling force is applied. The wire may have a round radial cross section or may be flattened along a circumferential direction of the endoprosthesis such as to have a ribbon-like shape. In the latter case, lateral movement of the wire along the periphery of the endoprosthesis during the pulling process is reduced and the wire is guided on the abluminal endoprosthesis surface. The splitting section may be attached to the distal end of the wire or may be formed as an integral part thereof. For example, the distal wire end may have a cross section that differs from that of the rest of its length, and that is particularly suited to split the sheath. Furthermore, the distal wire end may stand up in a radial direction of the endoprosthesis or form a hooked portion, so as to reliably catch and split the sheath.
In a further preferred embodiment, the second pull element is a wire. As for the case of the first pull element described above, in this way the second pull element can exhibit small radial dimensions whilst maintaining the required level of robustness. The radial wire cross section may be round or ribbon-like, whereby the latter configuration allows for a guided movement of the wire along the length of the endoprosthesis.
Preferably, the second pull element has a hooked portion at its distal end and the distal end of the sheath is received within the hooked portion. In this way, the distal sheath end can be securely attached to the distal end of the second pull element, without the need for any additional means of attachment that may increase the profile of the distal catheter delivery system end. For example, the distal end of the second pull element may be bent backwards, so as to form a hooked portion and the distal sheath end may be clamped within said portion, rendering the fabrication process cheap and simple.
Preferably, the distal end of the sheath is provided with a slit to receive the splitting section. Such a slit causes a reduction of the pulling force that is required to split the sheath at its distal end and thereby helps to prevent the formation of ripples in the sheath when the splitting section is moved towards the proximal end of the catheter delivery system. In addition, movement of the splitting section along the periphery of the sheath at the beginning of the splitting process is avoided, so that the sheath can be cut along a well-defined direction.
In another preferred embodiment, the sheath is at least partially covered with a hydrophilic coating. Such a coating effects a reduction of the frictional forces between sheath and luminal vessel surface, reducing the force required to remove the sheath.
Preferably, the second pull element runs between the endoprosthesis and the sheath in the region where the endoprosthesis is received. In this way, the second pull element can be prevented from moving across the body tissue of the inner vessel wall during the sheath removal process, avoiding possible damage to the patient's body or entanglement of the pull element. Furthermore, the pull element is securely guided between sheath and endoprosthesis when the sheath is removed.
In a further preferred embodiment, the first pull element and the second pull element are provided at positions that are substantially opposite each other on the circumference of the endoprosthesis. This arrangement allows for a maximum separation distance between the two pull elements and thus helps to avoid possible entanglement of the two components. Furthermore, when the distal end of the sheath is pulled towards the proximal catheter delivery system end, the force applied to the sheath is evenly distributed between the two parts of the split sheath portion that lie on opposite sides of the cut in a circumferential direction of the endoprosthesis. Thus, a smooth and uniform sheath removal can be achieved. In order to ensure said opposite arrangement of the two pull elements, a slit for receiving the splitting section may be placed opposite the position where the distal sheath end is secured to the second pull element.
In yet another preferred embodiment, the first pull element and the second pull element are coupled to each other by a coupling mechanism in such a way that, when the first pull element is pulled from its proximal end, also the second pull element is pulled via the coupling mechanism. In this way, the movement of the splitting section and the distal sheath end relative to each other is controlled by the coupling mechanism, ensuring a smooth sheath removal process. The surgeon only has to pull the first pull element, so that the operation of the delivery system is greatly simplified and any complications due to wrong use of the system are largely avoided. Furthermore, the coupling mechanism may be formed in a way that it ensures opposite positions of the two pull elements on the circumference of the endoprosthesis, as described above. For example, the coupling mechanism could be a ring-shaped object, with the two pull elements attached on opposite sides on its circumference.
Preferably, when the first pull element is pulled from its proximal end, both the distal end of the first pull element and the distal end of the second pull element move towards the proximal end of the catheter delivery system, with the distal end of the second pull element lagging behind the distal end of the first pull element by a predetermined distance, so that first the separating section starts separating the sheath and then the distal end of the sheath is pulled towards the proximal end of the catheter delivery system by the second pull element. Such a configuration can be achieved, for example, by making the second pull element longer than the actual distance between the position where it is secured to the distal sheath end and the position where it is attached to the coupling mechanism. This excess length is compensated for by arranging the second pull element in a wavy or undulating structure close to its proximal end. When the first pull element is pulled, the pulling force is transmitted to the second pull element via the coupling mechanism. While the splitting section is moved towards the proximal catheter delivery system end, the proximal end of the second pull element moves in the same direction, thereby straightening said wavy structure. This means that, although the proximal end of the second pull element moves, its distal end remains in its original position or, in other words, the system is in “lost motion”. Once the wavy portion of the second pull element is fully straightened, the distal sheath end is pulled towards the proximal catheter delivery system end. The lag between the splitting section and the distal sheath end is defined by the excess length of the second pull element, and can thus be easily adjusted in the fabrication process.
In this way, it can be ensured that the splitting section starts splitting the sheath before the distal sheath end is pulled out, towards the proximal end of the catheter delivery system. The lag between the two components defines the length along which the sheath is split before it is starting to be removed and thus also substantially sets the length over which the endprosthesis expands prior to the sheath removal process. Hence, the lag should be set large enough to warrant that the sheath splitting process is initiated before the sheath removal process, yet small enough to ensure that a sufficiently small part of the endprosthesis has expanded, to allow smooth removal of the sheath. Preferably, a lag of a few millimeters is chosen, for example 5 mm.
In another preferred embodiment, the endoprosthesis comprises a stent. The invention allows for the use of very thin-walled sheaths, avoiding any complications in the sheath removal process, and is thus particularly useful for delivering endoprostheses with a small radial diameter, such as vascular stents. The distal end profile of the catheter delivery system can be reduced to ensure precise positioning of the stent in the patient's body and once in its desired place, the stent can be controllably expanded.
In yet another preferred embodiment, the endoprosthesis comprises a self-expansible stent. The stent expansion and sheath removal process can be controlled and coordinated by adjusting the lag between splitting section and distal sheath end, as described above. In particular for small self-expansible stents, the catheter delivery system of the invention offers a significant improvement over the traditional method of stent delivery, where the sheath is withdrawn from its proximal end. This traditional method may cause thin-walled sheaths to stretch or tear, thereby limiting the minimum sheath wall thickness and thus also the minimum achievable distal end profile of the catheter delivery system. Nevertheless, the invention may be useful even with prostheses that are not self-expanding, such as the well-known balloon-expandable stents.
Preferably, the stent has an elongate shape, can be in a radially expanded and in a radially compressed state, and has a radial diameter of 6 French or less when it is in the radially compressed state and a radial diameter of 4 mm or more when it is in the radially expanded state. As described above, the catheter delivery system of the invention allows for a significant reduction in radial stent diameter, thus considerably extending the range of use of the apparatus.
Preferably, the sheath is made from PET. Such sheaths can be formed with sufficiently thin walls, while maintaining the required level of robustness to safely retain the endoprosthesis. PET is known for its low compliance. A balloon of PET behaves like a paper bag. In general, low compliance polymers are likely to be more useful in the present invention than higher compliance polymers like polyethylene. In addition, PET sheaths are cheap and easy to manufacture.
Furthermore, the endoprosthesis can be easily loaded into such a PET sheath, simply by placing the endoprosthesis inside the sheath and cold drawing the sheath in such a way as to axially strain it sequentially, preferably from the distal to the proximal end of the sheath. In this way, the sheath is stretched in its axial direction and the radial sheath diameter is adjusted by controlling this stretching process.
In a second aspect, the invention provides another catheter delivery system for introducing and placing an elongate endoprosthesis in a human or animal body. The catheter delivery system has a proximal end and a distal end and comprises an elongate region at the distal end, in which to receive the endoprosthesis, an elongate sheath to surround the endoprosthesis in the region, and a device for splitting the sheath along its length, to release the endoprosthesis from the region where the endoprosthesis is received. The device for splitting the sheath comprises a pull element with a proximal end at the proximal end of the delivery system and a distal end, comprising a splitting section for splitting the sheath. The pull element extends to a distal end of the sheath at a distal end of the delivery system and can be pulled along the length of the sheath from the proximal end of the catheter delivery system. In the region where the endoprosthesis is received, the pull element is devoid of any structure outside the sheath and the distal end of the pull element is distal of a distal end of the endoprosthesis at a distal end of the catheter delivery system. In this way, it can be prevented that the pull element moves across the body tissue of the inner vessel wall during the sheath splitting process, thereby avoiding possible damage to the patient's body or entanglement of the pull element. If the pull element is retained between sheath and endoprosthesis, it is securely guided during the sheath splitting process.
The splitting section may be attached to the pull element at its distal end or may form an integral part thereof. For example, the splitting section could comprise a sharp edge, like a blade, to cut the sheath when moved along its length. However, in a different embodiment, the splitting section may include a blunt component or portion instead that has the shape of, for example, a ball, a wedge or a “humpback”. The blunt component or portion has a larger thickness in the radial direction of the delivery system than the rest of the pull element. Thus, when said component or portion is moved along the length of the endoprosthesis, it induces extra tension in the sheath which is closely surrounding the endoprosthesis, causing the sheath to tear. This latter embodiment is particularly useful when the sheath is provided with a slit to receive the splitting section, reducing the force necessary to initiate the sheath splitting process. In this case, the splitting location is defined by the position of the slit and no sharp edges are present that might carry a risk of damage to the vessel wall tissue.
Furthermore, in the embodiment of the catheter delivery system of the second aspect of the invention illustrated in the appended drawings, only one pull element has to be pulled in order to split the sheath. This simplifies the use of the catheter delivery system and avoids the problems that may arise when more than one pull element is used, such as entanglement or an uneven distribution of pulling forces. Use of only one pull element is particularly advantageous in combination also with the first aspect of the invention, namely the splitting device aspect. In this case, only one pull element has to be pulled in order to split the sheath and reliably remove it from the region of the endoprosthesis. Nevertheless, the present invention can also be embodied in devices which exhibit more than one pull element, distributed around the circumference of the sheath. More than four such pull elements around the circumference, however, is not preferred, for the reasons given above (entanglement and uneven pulling).
In another aspect, the present invention provides a delivery system as identified above, which includes an elongate pull element to be pulled proximally from its proximal end, which pull element is arranged radially inside the sheath for pulling preferentially on a pull zone on the circumference of the distal end of the sheath, thereby to tear the sheath progressively along a tear line running the length of the sheath, starting at the distal end of the sheath, to release the device from the confining effect of the sheath, progressively, beginning at the distal end of the device.
The present invention represents another step long the path of design of delivery systems for devices such as self-expanding stents and stent grafts, at a location within the body that is difficult to reach, and challenging in terms of the small dimensions of the stenting location. A sheath that confines the self-expanding stent radially, until the moment when it is to be released into the bodily lumen, should be strong enough to confine the stent, but with a wall thickness as thin as can be achieved, for maximum flexibility and maximum capability to advance to the site of delivery through narrow and tortuous bodily lumens. The inventive concept, of releasing the stent by pulling the sheath proximally while tearing the sheath progressively, along a tear line that begins at the distal end of the sheath, fits with the concept of progressive release of a self-expanding stent commencing at its distal end. Furthermore, the idea of using a pull element to pull proximally the distal end of the sheath, during the progressive release of the stent, fits with the idea of pulling the sheath back proximally, away from its location between the stent and the bodily lumen to be stented, before the stent has fully expanded radially and pressed itself into the tissue wall of the lumen, thereby facilitating proximal withdrawal from the stenting location of the stent delivery system, including the sheath that has been torn by the pull element. Readers will appreciate that the tearing induced by pulling on the pull element is assisted and encouraged by the consequent radial expansion of the stent, progressively, beginning at its distal end, the hoop stresses in the sheath, being generated by the stenting forces within the radially expanding stenting rings of the stent escaping from the sheath.
The inventor envisages percutaneous placement of self-expanding stents or stent grafts with a delivery system that advances over a 35 thou (0.035 inches) diameter guidewire, the delivery system envisaged having in preferred embodiments a passing diameter of as little as 5 French (1 French=⅓ mm) or even less, for a bare stent prosthesis, or 6 French (or even less) for a covered stent with the potential to expand after placement to a diameter of up to 12 mm.
Furthermore, readers will appreciate that a stent release mechanism that works by tearing and pulling a sheath offers the potential to deploy stents and stent grafts that are axially longer than conventional. Indeed, one envisages deploying with the present invention stents and stent grafts having lengths of up to around 300 mm (or even longer).
With the pull element serving to drag material of the sheath into the annulus between the stent and the untorn sheath, it will generally be beneficial to provide the sheath material with a hydrophilic coating which will attract water molecules to the coating to serve as a lubricant, even while the pull element pulls the torn sheath proximally over the stent until the stent is fully released.
A preferred material for making the sheath is polyethylene phthalate-PET— that is cold-drawn over the prosthesis mounted in a catheter delivery system. Such a PET sheath can be sequentially axially stretched by the cold-drawing process, starting from the distal end of the self-expanding device and moving through to the proximal end of the device, to control the radial shrink diameter and final profile. Advantageously, the distal tip of the sheath is drawn down to an outside diameter that is substantially smaller than the outside diameter of the sheath where it embraces the self-expanding device, in order that the sheath shall itself define the outside of an atraumatic tip section for the delivery system as such.
The embodiment that is for the time being preferred has a single line of weakness in the wall thickness of the sheath, that extends lengthwise along the sheath, starting from a tear initiation point on the circumference of the distal end of the sheath and running to the proximal end of the sheath, the line of the line of weakness being near to the pull zone at the distal end of the sheath. Thus, pulling on the elongate pull element will impose tearing forces on the sheath at the tear initiation point of the line of weakness near to the pull zone, initiating a tearing of the sheath along the line of weakness, that progresses as the pull element is pulled and withdrawn proximally. Nevertheless, embodiments are envisaged in which there are two lines of weakness, parallel to each other, and one each side of the pull zone so that pulling on the elongate pull element pulls a strip of the sheath proximally, with the pull element, but not the remainder of the circumference of the sheath that is the arc of the circumference of the distal end of the sheath on the other side of the sheath circumference from the pull element, that complements the arc between the two tear initiation points and shared with the pull element.
The line of weakness (or each, when there are two parallel lines of weakness) is conveniently provided as a line of perforations through the wall thickness of the sheath and, preferably, each line of weakness terminates, at its tear initiation point, in a slit.
It is envisaged that the pull element will be contiguous with the sheath, monolithic with the sheath, but not cold-drawn in the same way as the sheath. Although such a pull element could be a band of the sheath material that has a width of as little as around 1 mm, band widths preferred for the time being are widths that take up at least 50% of the circumference of the sheath, so that pulling on the pull element directly pulls proximally into the annulus between the sheath and the self-expanding device an arc of the circumference of the sheath that is more than half of the circumference. It will be appreciated that such embodiments will be effective in pulling a large proportion of the material of the sheath progressively proximally as the self-expanding device expands out of the torn distal end of the sheath, to leave a minimum of the sheath material trapped between the expanded stent (or other device) and the tissue of the bodily lumen being stented.
An important application of the present invention is in catheter delivery systems for self-expanding stents of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy, as well as for stent grafts and other covered stents based on such alloys. With such delivery systems, it is conventional to provide a pusher that abuts the stent and is effective to resist proximal movement of the stent during the period that the sheath surrounding the stent is being withdrawn proximally. In consequence, the shaft of the catheter of the delivery system exhibits a push element and a pull element. The pull element running along the shaft is functional to pull the radially confining sheath proximally to release the stent. The push element is capable of enduring a compressive stress along its length, that provides to the pusher that is abutting the stent the necessary pushing force to restrain the stent from moving proximally with the retreating sheath. The state of the art in such delivery systems is replete with examples of systems that use a wire as the pull element and a tubular member such as a stainless steel hypo tube as the pushing element that delivers the pushing force to the pusher that is abutting the stent. In such arrangements, a connection is needed, between the pull wire that runs the length of the catheter shaft, and the elongate pull element of the present invention, that pulls the sheath proximally to release the stent. It may be convenient to provide this connection in the form of a complete or partial ring to which the pull wire is brazed or welded, or otherwise fixed, thereby to extend proximally from the ring, while the elongate pull element (a band of PET sheath material in preferred embodiments of the present invention) is bonded in some other way to the connector ring. For example, the connector ring could be provided as two components that snap-fit together, captivating the pull element between the two ring components when they snap together.
Stenting delivery systems are usually provided with rings that serve as radiopaque markers, so that the progress of the delivery system, and the progress of progressive stent release into the bodily lumen, can be monitored radioscopically. It is envisaged that the connector ring that connects the elongate pull element to a pull wire running the length of the shaft of the catheter is an element that lends itself to formulation as a radiopaque marker element. In that case, one envisages the connector ring being located close to the proximal end of the stent during the delivery phase, and moving proximally away from the stent pusher during deployment of the stent. Supposing that the stent pusher is itself serving as a radiopaque marker, the growing gap between the stent pusher and the connector ring, as seen radioscopically, serves as an indication of progress of stent release into the bodily lumen.
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show more clearly how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which
The present embodiment represents an example for a combination of two aspects of the present invention and illustrates the advantages of such a configuration: sheath splitting and removal can be performed reliably and quickly in one work step, simply by pulling a single pull element 18; the danger of damage to body tissue due to moving elements is minimised; entanglement of different pull elements is avoided; and the distal end profile of the catheter delivery system 10 can be reduced, allowing accurate placement and controlled deployment even of very small endoprostheses.
Referring now to drawing
Carried on the shaft 118 at its distal end zone is a distal tip element 122 that receives an inwardly tapered end portion 124 of the sheath 112 surrounding the stent. At the proximal end of the stent 110 is a pusher annulus 126 that is also a radiopaque marker and is fixed to the outside surface of the catheter shaft element 118. When the time comes to deploy the self-expanding stent 110, the hoop stresses in the sheath 112 surrounding the stent 110 have to be released, so that the stent 110 can expand radially into the stenting site within the bodily lumen. Conventionally, this is accomplished by simply pulling the sleeve 112 proximally until it slides over the stent 110, withdrawing proximally relative to the stent, to release the stent progressively, starting at its distal end, into the bodily lumen. However, with the present invention, the stent release mechanism is quite different, as will now be explained with reference to
First looking at
To accomplish this task, there is employed a pull element 140 which is shown in
Alternatively, the pull element might extend proximally the full length of the catheter. Proximal of the stent, it could be twirled into a strand with a helical trace on its cylindrical surface, that extends along a pull wire lumen in the catheter shaft. (See e.g., step 808 in
Turning now to
By the time the tearing of the sheath has progressed as far as the proximal end of the stent, the entire length of the stent will have expanded radially into position in the bodily lumen to be stented, and any portion of the sheath 112 that lies sandwiched between the stent and the bodily lumen will be only at the zone of the stent closest to its proximal end and will therefore be relatively easily withdrawn from between the stent and the bodily lumen, as soon as the stent delivery system as a whole is pulled proximally away from the deployed stent.
It will be apparent, then, to readers skilled in this art that the architecture of the distal end of the stent delivery system offers possibilities to get the passing diameter of that distal end zone down to values hitherto not obtained, because the sheath can be made of ultra-thin material. Furthermore, it is possible to contemplate deployment of extremely long stents, simply because the sheath is being steadily withdrawn proximally from its location between the expanding stent and the tissue of the bodily lumen, all the while that the sheath is being progressively torn along the line of weakness from its distal end to its proximal end, leaving sandwiched between the stent and the bodily lumen, when stent deployment is complete, a much smaller amount of sheath material than would be the case with for example a sheath slitting “cheesewire” as in EP-A-732087 or WO 2001/008599 that slit the sheath but do not withdraw it proximally during the stent deployment period.
Other variations will be evident to those skilled in the art. Specifically, the idea of providing a pull element between two parallel lines of weakness, so that the arc of sheath material between the two lines of weakness is pulled proximally by the pull element, but not the arc on the other side of the diameter of the sheath, is an intermediate embodiment between the previously proposed “cheesewire” system in which the full circumference of the sheath continues to lie between the expanded stent and the wall of the bodily lumen, and the “single line of weakness” embodiment shown in the present drawings, in which the full circumference of the sheath is pulled proximally with the pull element 140. Suppose, for example, that the pull element 140 is a band that extends around a substantial part of the circumference of the sheath, for example, halfway around the circumference of the sheath. In such a case, proximal withdrawal of half the sheath material will leave for withdrawal after stent deployment sheath material amounting to only half of the circumference, instead of the prior art full circumference. This is worthwhile progress, especially with lengthy devices to be placed in the lumen.
Although the presently preferred material for the sheath is PET, this does not exclude other materials. Materials selection is part of the routine duties of the person skilled in the art when seeking to optimise stent delivery systems. For the present inventors, as of now, the “best mode” of realising the present invention involves using a sheath of PET, cold drawn (that is to say, drawn at a temperature of 50° C. or less) and with a wall thickness after cold drawing (and with the stent or stent graft inside the PET tube lumen) of 0.035 mm (or even less). To reduce the force needed to pull the split sheath between the as yet unsplit sheath portion and its corresponding as yet unreleased stent length portion, it will generally be desirable to coat the PET sheath with a hydrophilic coating (know per se). Those skilled in the art will build on their specialist background knowledge when considering the above disclosures, factoring into their consideration of the present disclosure the specialist knowledge that they have from their own experience in this field. Quite evidently, engineers from other corporations will have their own design history and preferred ways of implementing the teachings set out above. The claims that follow seek to define the present inventive concept and should not be seen as directed exclusively to the illustrated embodiments, nor should they be seen as limited to mechanical equivalents of features shown in the illustrated embodiments.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0720327.6 | Oct 2007 | GB | national |
0808454.3 | May 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/064036 | 10/17/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/16/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/050265 | 4/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3953566 | Gore | Apr 1976 | A |
3962153 | Gore | Jun 1976 | A |
4187390 | Gore | Feb 1980 | A |
4732152 | Wallsten et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5087394 | Keith | Feb 1992 | A |
5217482 | Keith | Jun 1993 | A |
5324261 | Amundson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5453090 | Martinez et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5626605 | Irie et al. | May 1997 | A |
5662703 | Yurek et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690644 | Yurek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709703 | Lukic et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718861 | Andrews et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5755769 | Richard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765682 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5823995 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833694 | Poncet | Nov 1998 | A |
5843027 | Stone et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5968069 | Dusbabek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992000 | Humphrey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027510 | Alt | Feb 2000 | A |
6063092 | Shin | May 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149681 | Houser et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168748 | Wang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6254628 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6425898 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447540 | Fontaine et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6613067 | Johnson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613075 | Healy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645238 | Smith | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6702843 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6805703 | McMorrow | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833002 | Stack et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841029 | Lim | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6946092 | Bertolino et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7604668 | Farnsworth et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7815669 | Matsuoka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8568467 | Dorn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010011180 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027323 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030109886 | Keegan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114912 | Sequin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125709 | Eidenschink | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139801 | Sirhan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163193 | Widenhouse | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204235 | Edens et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040143272 | Cully et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143286 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143315 | Bruun et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148007 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199239 | Austin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267346 | Shelso | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004555 | Pursley | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049667 | Arbefeuille et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113902 | Geiser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050240254 | Austin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015171 | Armstrong | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030923 | Gunderson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060089627 | Burnett et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060212105 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060247661 | Richards et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259124 | Matsuoka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050017 | Sims et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074805 | Leeflang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080118546 | Thatcher et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080243224 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090254169 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090312828 | Vrba | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049297 | Dorn | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100168835 | Dorn | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110060397 | Dorn | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110137396 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137400 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137401 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137402 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120059448 | Parker et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120143303 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10339628 | Mar 2005 | DE |
0732087 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0941713 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1062966 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1679095 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2688688 | Sep 1993 | FR |
S59-51863 | Mar 1984 | JP |
H09-512194 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2000-116788 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-9037 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-299926 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2006-515786 | Jun 2006 | JP |
8603398 | Jun 1986 | WO |
9317636 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9415549 | Jul 1994 | WO |
9530385 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9632078 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9820812 | May 1998 | WO |
0018329 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0078248 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0108599 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0238084 | May 2002 | WO |
03002019 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03002034 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004062458 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004066809 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004096091 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005072650 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006020028 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006019626 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006071245 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006086709 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006096229 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006130326 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007103666 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2009050265 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009135934 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010076052 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010076057 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010115925 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011067277 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011067280 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2012072729 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/EP2008/064036 filed Oct. 17, 2008 International Preliminary Examination Report dated Apr. 20, 2010. |
PCT/EP2008/064036 filed Oct. 17, 2008 Written Opinion dated Jan. 22, 2009. |
Jan. 22, 2009 International Search Report of the ISA for international application No. PCT/EP2008/064036 filed Oct. 17, 2008. |
EP 0815339.7 filed Aug. 21, 2008 Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
EP 12164925.5 filed Jul. 6, 2011 Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 26, 2012. |
PCT/EP2009/055592 filed May 8, 2009 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 9, 2010. |
PCT/EP2009/055592 filed May 8, 2009 Search Report dated Aug. 3, 2009. |
PCT/EP2009/055592 filed May 8, 2009 Written Opinion dated Aug. 3, 2009. |
PCT/EP2009/060827 filed Aug. 21, 2009 Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 19, 2010. |
PCT/EP2009/060827 filed Aug. 21, 2009 Search Report dated Nov. 16, 2009. |
PCT/EP2009/060827 filed Aug. 21, 2009 Written Opinion dated Nov. 16, 2009. |
PCT/EP2009/064057 filed Oct. 26, 2009 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 6, 2011. |
PCT/EP2009/064057 filed Oct. 26, 2009 International Search Report dated May 17, 2010. |
PCT/EP2009/064057 filed Oct. 26, 2009 Written Opinion dated May 17, 2010. |
PCT/EP2010/068620 filed Dec. 1, 2010 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
PCT/EP2010/068620 filed Dec. 1, 2010 International Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2011. |
PCT/EP2010/068620 filed Dec. 1, 2010 Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2011. |
PCT/EP2010/068627 filed Dec. 1, 2010 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
PCT/EP2010/068627 filed Dec. 1, 2010 International Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2011. |
PCT/EP2010/068627 filed Dec. 1, 2010 Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2011. |
PCT/EP2011/071489 filed Dec. 1, 2011 International Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,409, filed Aug. 21, 2009 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,863, filed Dec. 31, 2009 Advisory Action dated Dec. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,863, filed Dec. 31, 2009 Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,863, filed Dec. 31, 2009 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/991,112, filed Nov. 4, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,409, filed Aug. 21, 2009 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,089, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,123, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,184, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,220, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/991,112, filed Nov. 4, 2010 Final Office Action dated May 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,420, filed Dec. 1, 2011 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2013. |
JP 2011-523429 Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2014. |
JP 2011-523429 Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,409, filed Aug. 21, 2009 Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,089, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Advisory Action dated Oct. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,089, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,089, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,123, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Advisory Action dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,123, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,123, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,184, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Advisory Action dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,184, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,220, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Advisory Action dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,220, filed Dec. 1, 2010 Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/991,112, filed Nov. 4, 2010 Advisory Action dated Dec. 23, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/991,112, filed Nov. 4, 2010 Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/991,112, filed Nov. 4, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,420, filed Dec. 1, 2011 Advisory Action dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,420, filed Dec. 1, 2011 Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100249907 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |