1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for deploying a medical device from a minimally invasive delivery system, such as a delivery catheter, and deploying the device within a patient.
2. Description of the Related Art
Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) technology is emerging that provides an extremely effective and safe alternative to therapies for aortic stenosis specifically, and aortic disease generally. Historically, aortic valve replacement necessitated open heart surgery with its attendant risks and costs. The replacement of a deficient cardiac valve performed surgically requires first placing the patient under full anesthesia, opening the thorax, placing the patient under extracorporeal circulation or peripheral aorto-venous heart assistance, temporarily stopping the heart, exposing and excising the deficient valve, and then implanting a prosthetic valve in its place. This procedure has the disadvantage of requiring prolonged patient hospitalization, as well as extensive and often painful recovery. Although safe and effective, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) presents advanced complexities and significant costs. For some patients, however, surgery is not an option for one or many possible reasons. As such, a large percentage of patients suffering from aortic disease go untreated.
To address the risks associated with open-heart implantation, devices and methods for replacing a cardiac valve by less invasive means have been developed. For example, CoreValve, Inc. of Irvine, Calif. has developed a prosthetic valve fixed to a collapsible and expandable support frame that can be loaded into a delivery catheter. Such a bioprosthesis may be deployed in-situ minimally invasively through the vasculature at significantly less patient risk and trauma. A description of the CoreValve bioprosthesis and various embodiments appears in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,018,406 and 7,329,278, and published Application Nos. 2004/0210304 and 2007/0043435. By using a minimally invasive replacement cardiac valve, patient recovery is greatly accelerated over surgical techniques. In the case of the CoreValve device, the support frame is made from shape memory material such as Nitinol. Other catheter-delivery valve replacement systems use stainless steel, or do not rely upon a rigid frame.
As demonstrated successfully to date, using a transcatheter procedure, percutaneous aortic valve replacement proceeds by delivering a prosthetic valve to the diseased valve site for deployment, either using a balloon to expand the valve support against the native lumen or exposing a self-expanding support in situ and allowing it to expand into place. With the latter, the self-expanding frame remains sheathed during delivery until the target site is reached. Advantageously, the frame may be secured to the catheter to avoid premature deployment as the sheath is withdrawn. In the CoreValve valve prosthesis, a hub is employed with two lateral buttons or ears around each of which a loop or alternatively a frame zig may reside during delivery. The internal radial force of the sheath keeps the frame compressed against the catheter, including the frame zigs in place around the lateral buttons. The catheter generally comprises at least two tubes, an inner tube that carries the prosthesis and a central tube that carries the sheath, permitting the sheath to move relative to the prosthesis.
As with traditional cardiovascular interventional therapies, transcatheter device deployment may proceed retrograde against normal blood flow, or antegrade, with blood flow. For percutaneous aortic valve replacement, entry through the femoral arteries proceeds in a retrograde format up through the iliac, the descending aorta, over the arch and to the native annulus. In some cases, entry has been made closer to the arch; for example through the left subclavian artery. Antegrade procedures have been performed where delivery takes place through the venous system transeptally to the native aortic annulus. More recently, transapical procedures have been performed whereby a cardiac surgeon delivers a catheter through the patient's chest wall, then through the exposed left ventricle apex and then to the target site.
With retrograde deployment, it is generally desired that the catheter be advanced within the vasculature so that the device is positioned where desired at the annulus site. With some embodiments under development, the desired site is the annulus itself With the CoreValve device, the desired site extends from the annulus to the ascending aorta, given its relative length. In the transfemoral approach, when the CoreValve device is positioned at the desired site, the sheath is withdrawn to the point where the inflow end of the device (preferably positioned at the native annulus) expands to engage and push radially outwardly the native valve leaflets. The sheath continues to be withdrawn proximally as the prosthesis continues to expand as it is exposed until the sheath covers just the outflow portion of the prosthesis still secured to the hub ears. Any readjustment of the axial position of the device in situ can be made during this process based upon electronic visual feedback during the procedure. Once well positioned, the sheath is fully withdrawn, the device fully expands in place, and the catheter is withdrawn through the center of the device and out through the vasculature. While it would be possible to deploy the prosthetic device such that the sheath could be withdrawn distally so that the outflow end of the prosthesis deploys first, such an arrangement would require advancing distally the central tube of the catheter connected to the sheath distally. In the case of transfemoral retrograde delivery, that would cause the central tube to project well into the left ventricle, which is not desirable. In a antegrade approach, for example transapical delivery, the reverse situation exists. There it is more desirable to advance the sheath distally to expose the inflow end of the prosthesis at the native annulus first. The native anatomy can accommodate this distal deployment because the central tube carrying the sheath is advanced up the ascending aorta towards the arch. Like the retrograde approach, once the valve prosthesis is fully deployed, the catheter may be withdrawn through the center of the prosthesis and removed through the apex of the heart.
Regardless of the direction of approach, with self-expanding frame technology, it is sometimes observed that even well-placed prosthetic valves inadvertently shift from the intended target site a small distance during the final delivery stage. The valve may still function effectively, but it is not optimized when, for example, the valve is placed so that it projects more than desired into the left ventricle. If the frame is implanted too low into the left ventricle, there is a risk of paravalvular leak where a portion of the blood ejected from the ventricle returns through the frame below the annulus.
In doing so, the catheter may sometimes inadvertently advance into the left ventricle for one of several possible reasons. One theory is that conical expansion of the zigs of the frame may influence positioning by following the path of least resistance until the inflow section is completely deployed in both the annulus and the ascending aorta may cause the prosthesis to shift. Another is the friction between the catheter sheath and the vessel wall, which may limit retraction of sheath even though the operator is pulling on it through the handle button. Consequently, the valve is pushed distally through the forward action of the plunger rather than the valve remaining stationary relative to the target site by the retraction of the sheath in the proximal direction. If the valve is not fully deployed (i.e., the sheath is not fully retracted) so that the valve frame is still secured to the catheter, axial adjustment is still possible. This is known as dynamic catheter positioning. In some cases, however, it is not determined until after full deployment that the frame is deployed amiss. In that circumstance, a repositioning procedure might need to be taken to correct placement. While possible in one of several different ways, it adds a level of complexity to the medical procedure that would be preferably avoided if possible. The problem is exacerbated because with transcatheter delivery, unlike surgical implantation, the clinician is unable to directly see the target site and must rely upon videographic technology to assess appropriate placement of the prosthesis.
One solution is to split the sheath into two discrete sections; a proximal section and a distal section. Doing so permits a controlled deployment that is central to the device, rather than at the distal or proximal end as with a single sheath. In U.S. Pat. No. 7,238,197, Seguin et al. have suggested such an arrangement, without any specificity or demonstration. See col. 14:36-42. No mention is made of the benefits or advantages of doing so, nor the particular configuration. Another example is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,133 to Yee et al. However, the distal and proximal portions are overlapping. Moreover, that disclosure does not address the issue regarding minimizing inaccurate deployment once the prosthesis is positioned at the target site. With an ill-configured split sheath arrangement, it has been observed that withdrawal of the catheter post-deployment may cause the proximal portion of the distal sheath to cause trauma to the native lumen where the vasculature is arcuate, such as the aortic arch. The problem may be encountered regardless of whether delivery proceeds antegrade or retrograde.
It is therefore desired to provide a transluminal catheter that enables prosthesis implantation accurately at the target location without the need for dynamic catheter positioning upon sheath retrieval. It is expected that, with such a solution, the prosthesis implantation procedure would become easier to manage with the desirable result that final positioning becomes more consistent.
The invention described and claimed herein comprises embodiments for minimally invasively delivering a medical device to a patient. The apparatus comprises a sheathed catheter system comprising an inner tube and a central tube, wherein the central tube has an outside surface suitable for accepting a medical device collapsed thereon in a stationary fashion. The sheath comprises a distal portion and a proximal portion that are moveable axially relative to each other, and with respect to the central tube, and can be brought together to abut in order to enclose therewithin a bioprosthesis such as a self-expanding frame supporting a tissue valve. In one embodiment, the distal sheath has a proximal section that is configured to bias radially inwardly to minimize a larger exposed annular surface that may catch on protruding surfaces or may scrape the native lumen surface of the patient upon retrieval. In another embodiment, a retaining hub for retaining a portion of the medical device being delivered comprises an extended portion that is generally cylindrical, or may have a non-tapered surface, such that it is configured to maintain low profile engagement with the distal sheath portion. Such an arrangement can also, when the distal sheath is retrieved, minimize vascular trauma or avoid being impeded by irregular surfaces. As contemplated, there are several different embodiments that can be made to employ the invention claimed herein. These and other features, aspects and advantages of embodiments of the present invention are described in greater detail below in connection with drawings of the apparatus and method, which is intended to illustrate, but not to limit, the embodiments of the present invention.
Thus one embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for minimally invasively delivering a medical device to a target site within a patient, the apparatus comprising a first tube having an outside surface suitable for accepting a medical device collapsed thereon in a stationary position; and a sheath comprising first and second portions that may be moved axially relative to each other and with respect to the first tube, the sheath portions configured so as to enclose a medical device collapsed onto the first tube when brought together, and configured to expose the medical device when directed away from each other, the first sheath portion comprising a section that is normally biased radially inwardly so as to maintain a low profile.
Another embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for delivering a medical device to a target site within a patient via a body lumen, the apparatus comprising: an inner tube; a distal sheath portion attached to the inner tube; an intermediate tube, moveable over the inner tube and at least partially into the distal sheath portion; an outer tube, moveable over the intermediate tube; a proximal sheath portion attached to the outer tube, so that, in use, the proximal sheath portion and the distal sheath portion can be moved together to substantially cover a medical device mounted on the intermediate tube and moved apart to deploy the medical device; the distal sheath portion having a proximal end portion configured to extend away from the walls of the body lumen when, in use, the sheath portions are apart and the distal sheath portion is moved proximately.
Another embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for minimally invasively delivering a medical device to a target site within a patient, the apparatus comprising: a first tube having an outside surface suitable for accepting a medical device collapsed thereon in a stationary position, the first tube comprising a hub for retaining at least a portion of a medical device on the first tube, wherein the hub comprises a generally extended non-tapered portion; and a sheath comprising first and second portions that may be moved axially relative to each other and with respect to the first tube, the sheath portions configured so as to enclose a medical device collapsed onto the first tube when brought together, and configured to expose the medical device when directed away from each other; wherein, during operation, the first sheath portion may be moved in a direction sufficient to expose the medical device while said first sheath portion still covers at least a part of the extended non-tapered portion of the hub.
Yet another embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for delivering a medical device to a target site within a patient via a body lumen, the apparatus comprising: an inner tube; a distal sheath portion attached to the inner tube; an intermediate tube, moveable over the inner tube and at least partially into the distal sheath portion, the intermediate tube having a hub at its distal end and having a region on the intermediate tube proximal of the hub for mounting the medical device; an outer tube, moveable over the intermediate tube; a proximal sheath portion attached to the outer tube, so that, in use, the proximal sheath portion and the distal sheath portion can be moved together to substantially cover a medical device mounted on the intermediate tube and moved apart to deploy the medical device; the hub having an axial length sufficient to permit the medical device to be deployed while the distal sheath portion covers at least part of the hub.
Referring to
The split sheath catheter 14 of
The catheter 14 further comprises a sheath 30 preferably made of resilient pliable material, such as those used in the industry. The sheath may comprise in whole or in part a braided, woven, or stitched structure, a polymer, or may comprise an inflatable balloon. The sheath 30 comprises a distal portion 32 and a proximal portion 34 that when pulled together to form joint 36 fully enclose the medical device 12 within. A first end 38 of distal sheath portion 32 is affixed to the central surface of inner tube 22 proximal its distal end 18. The proximal sheath portion 34 is affixed at its proximal end 40 to an exterior tube 44 that extends in the proximal direction and covers both the proximal portions of central tube 24 and inner tube 22 in a preferably concentric configuration.
As shown in
In an effort to avoid these issues, another embodiment of split sheath catheter, shown in
At the distal tip of the central tube 124 is a hub 126 having a generally tapered distal configuration and at least one but preferably two or more buttons 128 (
When it is desired to expose the medical device 112, the distal sheath portion 132 is directed in the distal direction 160 while the proximal sheath portion 134 is directed in the proximal direction 170. In preferably stepped deployment fashion, the distal and proximal sheath portions 132, 134 are directed moved away from each other to the point that each portion still retains the respective distal end 112A and proximal end 112B of the medical device 112. The sequence of movement is not critical; i.e., it is not critical whether the proximal sheath is directed proximally before or after the distal sheath is directed distally. The distal sheath portion 132 is moved distally by directing the inner tube 122 distally 160, while the proximal sheath portion 134 may be moved proximally by pulling the external tube 144 in the proximal direction 170. By stepped deployment, more accurate placement of the medical device at the target site may be permitted. When the mid-portion of the medical device 112 expands to engage the luminal surface of the vasculature, the clinician can assess whether it is placed in situ at the desired location. If not, the catheter system 114 may be moved into either distally or proximally as needed.
When it is determined that the medical device 112 is properly positioned, the proximal sheath portion 134 may be further moved proximally to expose the proximal end 112B of the medical device and permit expansion thereof, as shown in
By either withdrawing the inner tube 122 with distal sheath portion 132 proximally, or by advancing the central tube 124 and hub 126 distally (as shown in
Referring to
It should be understood that the terms distal and proximal as used herein are with reference to the clinician and that other inventive embodiments contemplated may orient the catheters 14, 114 and 214 differently with respect to the vasculature, depending upon the entry point and the target site. It is also contemplated that either the distal sheath portion or proximal sheath portion, or both, could be configured so as to invert outwardly or inwardly, as described further in co-pending and co-owned application Ser. No. 12/212,620 filed on Sep. 17, 2008. By way of example, instead of the distal sheath portion 132 of
In operation, the catheters described are particularly suited for delivery of a heart valve, where precise placement is important. Other critical and less-critical target sites are also contemplated. In the case of a self-expanding aortic valve replacement, the catheter may be delivered transfemorally, transeptally, transapically or through the sub-clavian, among other possible entry ways. In one procedure, the catheter is deployed so that the valved frame is positioned entirely aligned with the target site; e.g., aortic annulus up to ascending aorta. The frame may then be exposed from one end to the other, depending upon the direction of delivery, by either advancing the inner tube relative to the central tube or vice versa, or retraction of the central shaft. As the frame is exposed, it expands outwardly to engage the native intimal lining so placement accuracy is maximized. When the sheath is fully removed and the frame fully expanded, the catheter may then be withdrawn though the functioning prosthetic valve and removed from the patient.
Although embodiments of this invention have been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the present invention extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In particular, while the present loading system and method has been described in the context of particularly preferred embodiments, the skilled artisan will appreciate, in view of the disclosure, that certain advantages, features, and aspects of the system may be realized in a variety of other applications, many of which have been noted above. Additionally, it is contemplated that various aspects and features of the invention described can be practiced separately, combined together, or substituted for one another, and that a variety of combination and subcombinations of the features and aspects can be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3334629 | Cohn | Aug 1967 | A |
3409013 | Berry | Nov 1968 | A |
3540431 | Mobin-Uddin | Nov 1970 | A |
3587115 | Shiley | Jun 1971 | A |
3628535 | Ostrowsky et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3642004 | Osthagen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
3671979 | Moulopoulos | Jun 1972 | A |
3714671 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
3795246 | Sturgeon | Mar 1974 | A |
3839741 | Haller | Oct 1974 | A |
3868956 | Alfidi et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4056854 | Boretos et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4106129 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4233690 | Akins | Nov 1980 | A |
4265694 | Boretos | May 1981 | A |
4291420 | Reul | Sep 1981 | A |
4297749 | Davis et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4339831 | Johnson | Jul 1982 | A |
4343048 | Ross et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4345340 | Rosen | Aug 1982 | A |
4425908 | Simon | Jan 1984 | A |
4470157 | Love | Sep 1984 | A |
4501030 | Lane | Feb 1985 | A |
4574803 | Storz | Mar 1986 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4592340 | Boyles | Jun 1986 | A |
4610688 | Silvestrini et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612011 | Kautzky | Sep 1986 | A |
4647283 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4648881 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4662885 | DiPisa, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
4665906 | Jervis | May 1987 | A |
4681908 | Broderick et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4710192 | Liotta et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
4797901 | Goerne et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819751 | Shimada et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4834755 | Silvestrini et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4872874 | Taheri | Oct 1989 | A |
4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4883458 | Shiber | Nov 1989 | A |
4909252 | Goldberger | Mar 1990 | A |
4917102 | Miller et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4954126 | Wallsten | Sep 1990 | A |
4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
4979939 | Shiber | Dec 1990 | A |
4986830 | Owens et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5002559 | Tower | Mar 1991 | A |
5007896 | Shiber | Apr 1991 | A |
5026366 | Leckrone | Jun 1991 | A |
5032128 | Alonso | Jul 1991 | A |
5037434 | Lane | Aug 1991 | A |
5047041 | Samuels | Sep 1991 | A |
5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061273 | Yock | Oct 1991 | A |
5085635 | Cragg | Feb 1992 | A |
5089015 | Ross | Feb 1992 | A |
5152771 | Sabbaghian et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161547 | Tower | Nov 1992 | A |
5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
5217483 | Tower | Jun 1993 | A |
5232445 | Bonzel | Aug 1993 | A |
5272909 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5295958 | Shturman | Mar 1994 | A |
5327774 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5350398 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415633 | Lazarus et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431676 | Dubrul et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443446 | Shturman | Aug 1995 | A |
5449384 | Johnson | Sep 1995 | A |
5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
5489294 | McVenes et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5489297 | Duran | Feb 1996 | A |
5496346 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507767 | Maeda et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534007 | St. Germain et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545211 | An et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5575818 | Pinchuk | Nov 1996 | A |
5580922 | Park et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609626 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645559 | Hachtman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
5667523 | Bynon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674277 | Freitag | Oct 1997 | A |
5695498 | Tower | Dec 1997 | A |
5702368 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713953 | Vallana et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716417 | Girard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5746709 | Rom et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
5766151 | Valley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782809 | Umeno et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800456 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817126 | Imran | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker | Oct 1998 | A |
5824043 | Cottone, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824053 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824056 | Rosenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5824061 | Quijano et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824064 | Taheri | Oct 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843158 | Lenker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851232 | Lois | Dec 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860966 | Tower | Jan 1999 | A |
5861028 | Angell | Jan 1999 | A |
5868783 | Tower | Feb 1999 | A |
5876448 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888201 | Stinson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891191 | Stinson | Apr 1999 | A |
5906619 | Olson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907893 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913842 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
5944738 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954766 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968068 | Dehdashtian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984957 | Laptewicz, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989280 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997573 | Quijano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022370 | Tower | Feb 2000 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029671 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042589 | Marianne | Mar 2000 | A |
6042598 | Tsugita et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042607 | Williamson, IV | Mar 2000 | A |
6051014 | Jang | Apr 2000 | A |
6059809 | Amor et al. | May 2000 | A |
6110201 | Quijano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6146366 | Schachar | Nov 2000 | A |
6159239 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6162208 | Hipps | Dec 2000 | A |
6162245 | Jayaraman | Dec 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171335 | Wheatley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200336 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203550 | Olson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210408 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218662 | Tchakarov et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221006 | Dubrul et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241757 | An et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248116 | Chevilon | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258114 | Konya et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258115 | Dubrul | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258120 | McKenzie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277555 | Duran et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299637 | Shaolia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309382 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309417 | Spence et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338735 | Stevens | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348063 | Yassour et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352708 | Duran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371970 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371983 | Lane | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379383 | Palmaz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380457 | Yurek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398807 | Chouinard et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409750 | Hyodoh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416536 | Yee | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468303 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475239 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488704 | Connelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494909 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503272 | Duerig et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6508833 | Pavcnik et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6527800 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530947 | Euteneuer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530949 | Konya et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530952 | Vesely | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6562031 | Chandrasekaran et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562058 | Seguin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569196 | Vesely | May 2003 | B1 |
6585758 | Chouinard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592546 | Barbut et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605112 | Moll et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613077 | Gilligan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622604 | Chouinard et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632243 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635068 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645240 | Yee | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652571 | White et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656213 | Solem | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663663 | Kim et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669724 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673089 | Yassour et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6673109 | Cox | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676698 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682558 | Tu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682559 | Myers et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685739 | DiMatteo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689144 | Gerberding | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689164 | Seguin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692512 | Jang | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692513 | Streeter et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695878 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702851 | Chinn et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719789 | Cox | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6730377 | Wang | May 2004 | B2 |
6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736846 | Cox | May 2004 | B2 |
6752828 | Thornton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758855 | Fulton, III et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769434 | Liddicoat et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786925 | Schoon et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6790229 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792979 | Konya et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797002 | Spence | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6821297 | Snyders | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830575 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6830585 | Artof | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6846325 | Liddicoat | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866650 | Stevens | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872223 | Roberts | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875231 | Anduiza et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883522 | Spence et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887266 | Williams et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6890330 | Streeter et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896690 | Lambrecht et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913600 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929653 | Strecter | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936066 | Palmaz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939365 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6951571 | Srivastava | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6974474 | Pavcnik et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974476 | McGuckin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986742 | Hart et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989027 | Allen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989028 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991649 | Sievers | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004964 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018401 | Hyodoh et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7022133 | Yee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041128 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7044966 | Svanidze et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048014 | Hyodoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7097659 | Woolfson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101396 | Artof et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105016 | Shui et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115141 | Menz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128759 | Osborne et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147663 | Berg et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153324 | Case et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160319 | Chouinard et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175656 | Khairkhahan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195641 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198646 | Figulla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201761 | Woolfson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252682 | Seguin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7300457 | Palmaz | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300463 | Liddicoat | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316706 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320703 | DiMatteo et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335218 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338520 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377938 | Sarac et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381218 | Schreck | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7384411 | Condado | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7429269 | Schwammenthal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462191 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470284 | Lambrecht et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481838 | Carpentier et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7544206 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547322 | Sarac et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556646 | Yang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20010001314 | Davison et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010002445 | Vesely | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007956 | Letac et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010010017 | Letac et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011189 | Drasler et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025196 | Chinn et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032013 | Marton | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039450 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041928 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044647 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010508 | Chobotov | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029014 | Jayaraman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032480 | Spence et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035396 | Heath | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042650 | Vardi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052651 | Myers et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058995 | Stevens | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072789 | Hackett et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077696 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095209 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099439 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103533 | Langberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107565 | Greenhalgh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111674 | Chouinard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123802 | Snyders | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133183 | Lentz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138138 | Yang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151970 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161392 | Dubrul | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161394 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020193871 | Beyersdorf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014104 | Cribier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023300 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023303 | Palmaz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028247 | Cali | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036791 | Philipp et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040771 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040772 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055495 | Pease et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065386 | Weadock | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069492 | Abrams et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030109924 | Cribier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125795 | Pavcnik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130726 | Thorpe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130729 | Paniagua et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139804 | Hankh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149475 | Hyodoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149476 | Damm et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149478 | Figulla et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153974 | Spenser et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163189 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181850 | Diamond et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191519 | Lombardi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199913 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199963 | Tower et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199971 | Tower et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199972 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212410 | Stenzel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212452 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225445 | Derus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019374 | Hojeibane et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034411 | Quijano et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049224 | Buehlmann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049262 | Obermiller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049266 | Anduiza et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082904 | Houde et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088045 | Cox | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092858 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092989 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093005 | Durcan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093060 | Seguin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097788 | Mourlas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098112 | DiMatteo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106976 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106990 | Spence et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111096 | Tu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116951 | Rosengart | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117004 | Osborne et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122468 | Yodfat et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122514 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122516 | Fogarty | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127979 | Wilson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138742 | Myers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138743 | Myers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153146 | Lashinski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167573 | Williamson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167620 | Ortiz | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186563 | Iobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193261 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210240 | Saint | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210307 | Khairkhahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215333 | Duran | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215339 | Drasler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225353 | McGuckin, Jr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225354 | Allen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254636 | Flagle et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260394 | Douk et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267357 | Allen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010246 | Streeter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010285 | Lambrecht et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010287 | Macoviak | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015112 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027348 | Case et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033398 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038495 | Greenan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043790 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049692 | Numamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049696 | Siess | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055088 | Liddicoat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060029 | Le | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060030 | Lashinski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075584 | Cali | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075712 | Biancucci | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075717 | Nguyen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075719 | Bergheim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075724 | Svanidze | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075727 | Wheatley | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075730 | Myers | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075731 | Artof | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080474 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085841 | Eversull et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085842 | Eversull et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085843 | Opolski et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085890 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085900 | Case et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096568 | Kato | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096692 | Linder et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096724 | Stenzel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096734 | Majercak et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096735 | Hojeibane et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096736 | Osse et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096738 | Cali et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107871 | Realyvasquez et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113910 | Paniagua | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119688 | Bergheim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131438 | Cohn | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137686 | Salahieh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137688 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137692 | Haug | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137695 | Salahieh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137701 | Salahieh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143807 | Pavcnik et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143809 | Salahieh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148997 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165477 | Anduiza et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187616 | Realyvasquez | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197695 | Stacchino et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203549 | Realyvasquez | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203605 | Dolan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203618 | Sharkawy | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222674 | Paine | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228495 | Macoviak | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240200 | Bergheim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261759 | Lambrecht et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283962 | Boudjemline | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004439 | Spenser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004469 | Sokel | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009841 | McGuckin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060052867 | Revuelta et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058775 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089711 | Dolan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100685 | Seguin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116757 | Lashinski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135964 | Vesely | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136036 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142848 | Gabbay | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167474 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178740 | Stacchino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195134 | Crittenden | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206192 | Tower et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206202 | Bonhoefer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212111 | Case et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060247763 | Slater | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259134 | Schwammenthal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259136 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271166 | Thill et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271175 | Woolfson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276874 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276882 | Case et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282161 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005129 | Damm et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010878 | Raffiee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016286 | Herrmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027518 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027533 | Douk | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038295 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043381 | Furst et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043431 | Melsheimer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043435 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051377 | Douk et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073392 | Heyninck-Janitz | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078509 | Lotfy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078510 | Ryan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088431 | Bourang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093869 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100439 | Cangialosi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100440 | Figulla | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100449 | O'Neil et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112415 | Bartlett | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162102 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162113 | Sharkawy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185513 | Woolfson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203391 | Bloom et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225681 | House | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232898 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233222 | Roeder et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233228 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233237 | Krivoruchko | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233238 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238979 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239254 | Marchand et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239265 | Birdsall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239266 | Birdsall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239269 | Dolan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239273 | Allen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244544 | Birdsall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244545 | Birdsall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244546 | Francis | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244553 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244554 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244555 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244556 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244557 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250160 | Rafiee | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255394 | Ryan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255396 | Douk et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288000 | Bonan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004696 | Vesely | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009940 | Cribier | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015671 | Bonhoeffer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021552 | Gabbay | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048656 | Tan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065206 | Liddicoat | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071361 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071362 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071363 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071366 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071368 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077234 | Styrc | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082165 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082166 | Styrc et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080133003 | Seguin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140189 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147105 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147180 | Ghione et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147181 | Ghione et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147182 | Righini et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichow et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154356 | Obermiller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161910 | Revuelta et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161911 | Revuelta et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183273 | Mesana et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188928 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215143 | Seguin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215144 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228254 | Ryan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228263 | Ryan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234797 | Styrc | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243246 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255651 | Dwork | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255660 | Guyenot et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255661 | Straubinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262593 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269878 | Iobbi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005863 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012600 | Styrc et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048656 | Wen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054976 | Tuval et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069886 | Suri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069887 | Righini et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069889 | Suri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085900 | Weiner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099653 | Suri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138079 | Tuval et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164004 | Cohn | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171447 | VonSeggesser et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192585 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192586 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192591 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198316 | Laske et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216310 | Straubinger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216312 | Straubinger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216313 | Straubinger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234443 | Ottma et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240264 | Tuval et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240320 | Tuval | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287296 | Manasse | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036479 | Hill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094411 | Tuval et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100167 | Bortlein et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131054 | Tuval et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137979 | Tuval et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161045 | Righini | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100234940 | Dolan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007-10007443.3 | Aug 2007 | CN |
3640745 | Jun 1987 | DE |
195 46 692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
195 46 692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
198 57 887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0103546 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0597967 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1057459 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1057460 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1088529 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1255510 | Nov 2002 | EP |
0937439 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1340473 | Sep 2003 | EP |
0819013 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1469797 | Nov 2005 | EP |
2788217 | Dec 1999 | FR |
2815844 | May 2000 | FR |
2056023 | Mar 1981 | GB |
2433700 | Dec 2007 | GB |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9529640 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9814137 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9933414 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0044313 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0047136 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2009111241 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0135870 | May 2001 | WO |
0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
0241789 | May 2002 | WO |
0243620 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0249540 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03003949 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03011195 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03030776 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004019811 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004019825 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004023980 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004041126 | May 2004 | WO |
2004058106 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004089250 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005004753 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005027790 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005046528 | May 2005 | WO |
2006026371 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008047354 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008100599 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008138584 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008150529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009002548 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009029199 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009042196 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009045338 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009061389 | May 2009 | WO |
2009091509 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,163, filed Oct. 13, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/192,199, filed Sep. 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,858, filed Oct. 17, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/596,343, filed Apr. 14, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/129,170, filed Jun. 9, 2008. |
Andersen, H.R. et al, “Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs.” Euro. Heart J. (1992) 13:704-708. |
Babaliaros, et al., “State of the Art Percutaneous Intervention for the Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: A Review of the Current Technologies and Ongoing Research in the Field of Percutaneous Heart Valve Replacement and Repair,” Cardiology 2007; 107:87-96. |
Bailey, “Percutaneous Expandable Prosthetic Valves,” In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. vol. II. Second edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1994:1268-1276. |
Block, et al., “Percutaneous Approaches to Valvular Heart Disease,” Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 7 (2005) pp. 108-113. |
Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Insertion of the Pulmonary Valve,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (United States), May 15, 2002, pp. 1664-1669. |
Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Mitral Valve Dilatation with the Multi-Track System,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions—Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (United States), Oct. 1999, pp. 178-183. |
Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Replacement of Pulmonary Valve in a Right-Ventricle to Pulmonary-Artery Prosthetic Conduit with Valve Dysfunction,” Lancet (England), Oct. 21, 2000, pp. 1403-1405. |
Bonhoeffer, et al, “Technique and Results of Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty With the Multi-Track System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology (United States), 200, pp. 263-268. |
Bonhoeffer, et al, “Transcatheter Implantation of a Bovine Valve in Pulmonary Position: A Lamb Study,” Circulation (United States), Aug. 15, 2000, pp. 813-816. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Images in Cardiovascular Medicine. Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement in Animals,” Circulation (United States), Mar. 16, 2004, 109, p. e161. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Is Percutaneous Implantation of a Bovine Venous Valve in the Inferior Vena Cava a Reliable Technique to Treat Chronic Venous Insufficiency Syndrome?” Medical Science Monitor—International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research (Poland), Mar. 2004, pp. BR61-BR66. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Off-pump Replacement of the Pulmonary Valve in Large Right Ventricular Outflow Tracts: A Hybrid Approach,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (United States), Apr. 2005, pp. 831-837. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Will We Get There?” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (England), Dec. 2001, pp. 705-706. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Closure of a Paravalvular Mitral Regurgitation with Amplatzer and Coil Prostheses,” Archives des Maladies du Coeur Et Des Vaisseaux (France), May 2002, pp. 483-486. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Biological Valve in the Aorta to Treat Aortic Valve Insufficiency—A Sheep Study,” Medical Science Monitor—International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research (Poland), Apr. 2002, pp. BR113-BR116. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Biological Valve in Aortic Position: Preliminary Results in a Sheep Study,” European Heart Journal 22, Sep. 2001, p. 630. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Valve in the Descending Aorta in Lambs,” European Heart Journal (England), Jul. 2002, pp. 1045-1049. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Replacement in a Large Right Ventricular Outflow Tract: An Experimental Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (United States), Mar. 17, 2004; pp. 1082-1087. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Valve Insertion: A New Approach,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (United States), Mar. 2003, pp. 741-742. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Stent Implantation Combined with a Valve Replacement to Treat Degenerated Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Prosthetic Conduits,” European Heart Journal 22, Sep. 2001, p. 355. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Steps Toward Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement,” Circulation (United States), Feb. 12, 2002, pp. 775-778. |
Boudjemline, et al, “The Percutaneous Implantable Heart Valve,” Progress in Pediatric Cardiology (Ireland), 2001, pp. 89-93. |
Boudjemline, et al, “Transcatheter Reconstruction of the Right Heart,” Cardiology in the Young (England), Jun. 2003, pp. 308-311. |
Coats, et al, “The Potential Impact of Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Stent Implantation on Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Re-Intervention,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (England), Apr. 2005, pp. 536-543. |
Cribier, A. et al, “Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: First Human Case Description,” Circulation (2002) 3006-3008. |
Davidson et al., “Percutaneous therapies for valvular heart disease,” Cardiovascular Pathology 15 (2006) 123-129. |
Hanzel, et al., “Complications of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: experience with the Criber-Edwards™ percutaneous heart valve,” EuroIntervention Supplements (2006), 1 (Supplement A) A3-A8. |
Huber, et al., “Do Valved Stents Compromise Coronary Flow?” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004;25:754-759. |
Khambadkone, “Nonsurgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement: Why, When, and How?” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions—Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (United States), Jul. 2004, pp. 401-408. |
Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of Pulmonary Valves,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (England), Nov. 2003, pp. 541-548. |
Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Early and Medium Term Results,” Circulation 108 (17 Supplement), Oct. 28, 2003, p. IV-375. |
Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Morphology on Case Selection,” Circulation 108 (17 Supplement), Oct. 28, 2003, p. IV-642-IV-643. |
Lutter, et al, “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: An Experimental Study. I. Studies on Implantation,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Apr. 2002, pp. 768-776. |
Lutter, et al, “Percutaneous Valve Replacement: Current State and Future Prospects,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery (Netherlands), Dec. 2004, pp. 2199-2206. |
Medtech Insight, “New Frontiers in Heart Valve Disease,” vol. 7, No. 8 (2005). |
Palacios, “Percutaneous Valve Replacement and Repair, Fiction or Reality?” Journal of American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, No. 8 (2004) pp. 1662-1663. |
Ruiz, “Transcathether Aortic Valve Implantation and Mitral Valve Repair: State of the Art,” Pediatric Cardiology, vol. 26, No. 3 (2005). |
Saliba, et al, “Treatment of Obstructions of Prosthetic Conduits by Percutaneous Implantation of Stents,” Archives des Maldies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux (France), 1999, pp. 591-596. |
Webb, et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde from the Femoral Artery,” Circulation (2006), 113;842-850. |
Yonga, et al, “Effect of Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy on Pulmonary Venous Flow in Severe Mitral Stenosis,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Jan. 1999, pp. 28-30. |
Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy: Initial Experience in Nairobi Using a New Multi-Track Catheter System,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Feb. 1999, pp. 71-74. |
Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Valvuloplasty for Pulmonary Valve Stenosis: Report on Six Cases,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Apr. 1994, pp. 232-235. |
Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy in Juvenile Mitral Stenosis,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Apr. 2003, pp. 172-174. |
Commeau et al, “Percutaneous balloon dilatation of calcific aortic valve stenosis: anatomical and haemodynamic evaluation,” 1988, British Heart Journal, 59:227-238. |
Stassano et al., “Mid-term results of the valve-on-valve technique for bioprosthetic failure,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2000; 18:453-457. |
Expert report of Dr. Nigel Buller, dated Jan. 12, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (83 pages). |
Expert report of Dr. Nigel Buller, non-confidential annex—infringement, dated Jan. 12, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (12 pages). |
Expert report of Dr. Rodolfo Quijano, dated Jan. 9, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (18 pages). |
First Expert report of Prof. David Williams, dated Jan. 12, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (41 pages). |
First Expert report of Prof. Martin Rothman, dated Jan. 12, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (64 pages). |
Fourth Expert report of Prof. Martin Rothman, dated Apr. 22, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (10 pages). |
Second Expert report of Dr. Nigel Buller, dated Feb. 25, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (24 pages). |
Second Expert report of Dr. Rodolfo Quijano, dated Feb. 26, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (6 pages). |
Second Expert report of Prof. David Williams, dated Feb. 5, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (15 pages). |
Second Expert report of Prof. Martin Rothman, dated Feb. 5, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (11 pages). |
Third Expert report of Dr. Nigel Buller, dated Apr. 21, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (6 pages). |
Third Expert report of Dr. Rudolfo Quijano, dated Apr. 27, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (3 pages). |
Third Expert report of Prof. David Williams, dated Apr. 22, 2009, Edwards LifeSciences v. Cook Biotech Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division, Patents Court, United Kingdom, Claim No. HC 08CO0934 (9 pages). |
Pavcnik et al., “Aortic and venous valve for percutaneous insertion,” Min. Invas. Ther. & Allied Techol. 2000, vol. 9, pp. 287-292. |
First Expert report of Dr. Nigel Person Buller (30 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Second Expert report of Dr. Nigel Person Buller (5 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Drawing by Dr. Buller (Edwards Expert) of his interpretation of the “higher stent” referred to at col. 8, lines 13-222 of Andersen EP 592410B1 (1 page), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Drawing by Dr. Buller (Edwards Expert) of “higher stent” on the schematic representation of the aortic valve area set out in Figure 2 of Rothman's first expert report (1 page), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
First Expert report of Professor John R. Pepper (20 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Second Expert report of Professor John R. Pepper (3 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
First Expert report of Dr. Anthony C. Lunn (7 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
First Witness statement of Stanton Rowe (9 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Second Witness statement of Stanton Rowe (3 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
PVT slides naming Alain Cribier, Martin Leon, Stan Rabinovich and Stanton Rowe (16 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
First Expert report of Professor Martin Terry Rothman (75 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Reply Expert report of Professor Martin Terry Rothman (9 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
First Expert report of Richard A. Hillstead (41 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Reply Expert report of Richard A. Hillstead (9 pages), Corevalve, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc., High Court of Justice—Chancery Division Patents Court, United Kingdom, Case No. HC-07-C01243. |
Expert Rebuttal Report of Prof. Martin T. Rothman (32 pages) redacted, Edwards v. CoreValve, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 08-091, dated Jul. 29, 2009. |
Expert Report of Prof. Martin T. Rothman (74 pages ) redacted, Edwards v. CoreValve, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 08-091, dated Jun. 29, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100100167 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |