Patent Grant
12348679
This application is a U.S. National Stage filing of International Application PCT/EP2021/067341, by Zha, et al., titled “DELTA IMAGE SENSOR WITH DIGITAL PIXEL STORAGE”, filed Jun. 24, 2021, which claims benefit of priority of European Patent Application Number 20182536.1, filed on Jun. 26, 2020, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to an image sensor comprising a plurality of pixel circuits.
Image sensors with one ADC per pixel, or per small sub-set of pixels, are well known. These are typically used in applications (e.g. X-ray particle track tracing or satellite imaging) where significant processing is carried out in the pixel.
Image sensors with a single-slope ADC where each pixel includes a comparator are known, e.g. Reckleben et al., 2015, Suarez et al., 2010 and Chi et al., 2010. In particular, Suarez et al. create an analogue slope and digital code globally for the pixel arrangement and provide a digital code to the pixel.
Image sensors where the digital value is stored inside the pixel and compared between samples to create event change data are not known. The current invention enables an area optimised small pixel structure producing a high resolution and cost optimised sensor.
Image sensors, where a representation of the previous illumination level is digitally stored in the pixel and compared between samples to create event change data, are known from WO 2014/174498 A1, while Itoh et. al, “4-Layer 3-D IC with a function of parallel signal processing”, Microelectronic engineering, vol 15, no. 1-4, 1991, pages 187-190, earlier proposed a conceptually related structure with a simple single bit pixel comparison to a fixed level.
Image sensors with event generation using image pixel level change detection, storage and comparison in the analogue domain are known, e.g. Chi et. al, “CMOS Camera With In-Pixel Temporal Change Detection and ADC”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, no. 10, 2007, pages 2187-2196. Comparison and storage in the analogue domain provides advantages over a digital approach (e.g. compact realisation) and disadvantages (e.g. gradual storage degradation, including “hot-pixels”, sensitivity to mismatch, reduced flexibility of light to electric conversion function).
Image sensors, which share circuitry between pixels, are well known, e.g. KR 2020-0029328 A.
The use of stroboscopic effects is generally known, as well as the suppression of harmonics by averaging or synchronising over a period of a disturbance (unwanted signal), e.g. US 2015/358570 A1, where the technique is applied in a camera to detect and synchronise to a variable light source and then to suppress the response to the light source.
WO 2020/080383 A1 discloses an event based dynamic vision sensor with a filter to ignore events from one pixel, based on the event status (single bit) of adjacent pixels.
T. Delbruck “Frame-free dynamic digital vision”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Secure Life Electronics, Advanced Electronics for Quality Life and Society, 2008, page 21-26, discloses to filter events from a dynamic vision sensor based on the time-stamp of the last event of that pixel, or the time-stamp of adjacent pixels. This processing is carried out outside the pixel array requiring transmission of the events out of the array for subsequent filtering, in a computationally expensive manner (32 bit time-stamps).
EP 3 313 064 A1 discloses an analogue storage dynamic vision sensor, where one comparator input is a representation of the previous value of the pixel illumination, which is then later used for comparison. This can be considered analogue feedback from the previous level to control the subsequent function of the analogue comparator, which is enabled (sampled), when a digital event output is created.
EP 2 933 995 A1 address the issues of poor mismatch in the standard analogue storage implementation of the dynamic vision sensors using transistors in sub-threshold operation. As operation in this transistor mode only functions correctly over a limited range, they use global analogue feedback to the analogue part of the acquisition circuits of the entire array to obtain satisfactory operation.
There may be a need for a delta image sensor comprising an improved pixel circuit having a digital storage of a representation of the prior illumination intensity in the pixel. Such a need may be met with the subject-matter of the independent claims. Advantageous embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
Ideas underlying embodiments of the present invention may be interpreted as being based, inter alia, on the following observations and recognitions:
CMOS (Complementary metal oxide silicon) image sensors are produced in optimised foundry processes in high volume in specialised processes. CMOS digital logic devices are produced in optimised foundry processes in high volume. The density of both processes is increasing, in particular the density of the logic processes. The increased density permits increased digital complexity related to a pixel circuit in an image sensor.
Digital storage of a prior level in a pixel circuit has advantages in the fidelity of the storage and in the subsequent processing of the stored level.
Local processing of the levels has efficiency advantages in power and area as the propagation and processing of redundant data is limited.
This invention discloses a structure and method in which digital conversion and storage are combined in pixel circuits together with local evaluation of the differences over time and location and preparation and propagation of event information.
The invention is defined in the independent claims. Dependent claims describe preferred embodiments thereof.
The present invention relates to a delta image sensor comprising an arrangement of pixels and a plurality of acquisition circuits corresponding to at least one pixel and formed as part of an integrated circuit. Each acquisition circuit includes at least one sensor circuit comprising a photosensor configured to generate a sensor signal, VSIG, depending on a light signal illuminating the photosensor of the at least one pixel and at least one analogue to digital conversion circuit configured to generate a digital representation corresponding to a current VSIG. At least one digital storage circuit is configured to store a representation of at least one previous VSIG. At least one digital comparison circuit is configured to compare the level of the stored representation with the current VSIG to detect whether a changed level is present. At least one digital output circuit is configured to generate an event output under the condition of the changed level. The sensor circuit is configured to change an analogue function of its read-out characteristics to generate a respective changed VSIG.
Various Embodiments May Preferably Implement the Following Features:
The at least one sensor circuit may be configured to receive a digital control signal to digitally control a modification of the analogue function.
Preferably, the digital control signal is provided by a locally stored and/or calculated digital value within a digital part of the acquisition circuit.
The digital control of the analogue function may provide a hysteresis function within at least one respective pixel.
The digital control of the analogue function may provide a hysteresis function across at least one group of pixels.
The sensor circuit may be configured to receive a feedback from the digital storage circuit corresponding to the stored digital level, or the stored digital level of adjacent pixels, and wherein the sensor circuit may be configured to generate VSIG depending on the feedback.
Each acquisition circuit may be formed as an integrated circuit or part of an integrated circuit. The acquisition circuit may also be referred to as pixel circuit throughout the specification. The at least one sensor circuit may continuously or periodically generate a sensor signal. The analogue to digital conversion circuit may convert a current VSIG to a digital signal. The digital storage circuit may accordingly be configured to store a representation of at least one digital signal corresponding to a previous VSIG. The digital representations of a current and a previous VSIG may be compared by the at least one digital comparison circuit. The previous VSIG, or digital representation of the VSIG, respectively, may correspond to a signal generated in any previous sample period and stored in the digital storage circuit. It may also be provided externally and stored as a reference signal. Also, at least one event output line may be comprised in the circuit to output the event output from the delta image sensor. The at least one event output line may also be shared by multiple digital output circuits.
Preferably, each acquisition circuit is shared between at least two pixels, wherein preferably the pixels are adjacent to each other.
Preferably, the sensor circuit is configured to generate VSIG based on one of the following relationships:
The control signal may be provided from outside the array of pixels and acquisition circuits. There may be one control signal for the whole array, or more targeted.
Preferably, the sensor circuit is configured to change the dependency of VSIG on the light intensity in response to a control signal during operation, preferably from time to time, and/or the sensor circuit is configured to change the dependency of VSIG on the light intensity in response to a control signal during operation individually for at least one pixel or a subset of pixels.
The control signal changes from time to time may result from a change of global light intensity or operating mode. There may be provided a separate circuit for generating control signal changes from time to time.
The image sensor may preferably further implement the following features:
In particular, under item f) above, a repeat rate of the swept signal may be chosen from one or more repeat rates in correspondence with a light source modulation of the light signal illuminating the photosensor, preferably to increase or suppress a response to a target, e.g. the light source with a given frequency or to suppress a response to a disturbance with a given frequency.
Preferably, the image sensor further comprises at least one reference pixel configured to set the swept ramp limits, wherein preferably the at least one reference pixel is positioned outside the arrangement of pixels, and/or wherein preferably the at least one reference pixel is biased under reference conditions.
Preferably, the digital comparison circuit is configured to perform comparison with the stored level during the sweep of the analogue signal, or the digital comparison circuit is configured to perform comparison with the stored level after the sweep of the analogue signal.
“During the sweep of the analogue signal” and “during the swept analogue signal” may denote the same process.
In particular, if the comparison is performed during the sweep of the analogue signal, the A/D output value does not need to be stored, just the result of the comparison. This results in less memory requirements, but more comparisons. If the comparison is performed after the sweep of the analogue signal, the A/D output value does not need to be stored. This increases the memory requirement but reduces the number of comparisons required.
Preferably,
Preferably, the output circuit is configured to generate an output dependent on the comparison result of the comparison circuit in adjacent pixels, or the output circuit is configured to generate an output dependent on a function of adjacent pixels in a fixed configuration or in a configuration which is changed during operation, wherein preferably the function is an average function, and/or the output circuit is configured to generate an output if a rate of change of the comparison of the comparison exceeds a certain threshold.
Preferably,
The output lines may be provided in single or multiple number. They may also be shared between output circuits. There may also be provided an output circuit.
Furthermore, the stored digital representation in the acquisition circuit may also be written from outside the array. A previous output may be written back into the stored pixel digital levels to provide a changing reference for the circuit. The circuit will then only report changes with respect to the reference. Normally image data would represent all of the pixels. An event stream, however, only includes changes, and therefore less data. Writing an event stream back therefore allows for lower data rates.
Preferably, the A/D circuit may receive feedback from the stored digital level, or the stored digital level of adjacent pixels, and may be configured to adjust the output signal depending on the feedback.
Preferably, the sensor circuit is configured to provide VSIG, and/or the image sensor is constructed of multiple semiconductor layers, wherein each level is optimised for the function of that layer.
In particular, an analogue representation or an analogue level of VSIG may be provided and directly read out from the circuit or the array.
Groups of acquisition circuits may be connected to a common, or multiple common, event output lines.
A group of acquisition circuits may share at least one of the following circuit elements, (a) digital output circuit, (b) digital comparison circuit, (c) additionally digital storage circuit, (d) additionally analogue to digital conversion circuit. The figures are representative, other combinations of shared elements are not excluded.
The disclosure may also encompass an implementation of analogue to digital conversion using a comparator with a swept analogue signal and a digital code.
The present invention provides event generation on a multi silicon layer device, which is not disclosed in Itoh et. al identified above.
Sharing circuitry between pixels in image sensors (e.g. KR 2020-0029328 A) is critical in image sensor design to create a dense pixel array and a high pixel resolution. The current invention uses digital storage and event calculation in a time sequential manner, which is particularly suited to the sharing of resources between pixels without performance degradation.
Further, the present invention extends the use of the technique disclosed by US 2015/358570 A1 to dynamic vision sensors, where the use of digital storage and processing with a global timing is efficient and the impact in reduction of number of generated events is important to the power consumption and subsequent processing.
The present invention enabled by in-pixel digital storage, may selectively create events based on the stored digital levels (multiple bits) in adjacent pixels. A particular configuration of this selective filtering may be used to achieve the same result as the single bit filtering disclosed by WO 2020/080383 A1.
In addition, in comparison with, e.g., T. Delbruck identified above, the present invention has an inherent time-base due to the A/D conversion technique for reduced time-stamp complexity and enables local, digital, temporal filtering of the events with no further transmission.
The present invention modulates the analogue circuit parameters based on the stored digital level or event output, as this feedback is efficiently realised (surface area) with switches under digital control, which differs from the above described disclosure of EP 3 313 064 A1.
In comparison to EP 2 933 995 A1 described above, the present invention proposes modulation of the analogue circuit parameters based on the locally stored pixel digital level or event output, as this feedback is efficiently realised (surface area) with switches under digital control. This is different in function (pixel local), implementation (digital control) and purpose with respect to EP 2 933 995 A1.
The present invention enables an area optimised (small) pixel structure producing a high resolution and cost optimised sensor using the advantages of digital in-pixel conversion and storage.
The invention is further described with reference to the figures. Therein,
The same reference numerals denote same or similar components in the figures. Redundant description will therefore be omitted.
At least one event output line (16) may be comprised in the pixel circuit (1) or outside the pixel circuit (1) to output the event output from the delta image sensor. The at least one event output line (16) may also be shared by multiple digital output circuits (15).
This first exemplary pixel configuration enables the detection of a changed illumination intensity over an interval. Where the digital comparison circuit (14) detects a difference in the digital representation of the stored signal and the digital representation after the interval and this difference meets a given criterion, an event is generated and the fact of the change is reported as event information at the output of the image sensor.
A digital storage of the level may be preferential in a range of applications, as (i) the stored level does not degrade with time, (ii) the storage circuit (13) can be physically smaller, (iii) the value can be easily used in adjacent cells, (iv) the value can be more flexibly used to the realisation of combination functions with other pixels or previous values.
In a further exemplary configuration, as illustrated in
Please note that other sharing configurations are possible and the above listing does not exclude these possibilities. It is also possible to share different functions to a different extent, e.g. the A/D conversion circuit (12) over 4 pixels and the event generation circuit (15) over 16 pixels. Other configurations may also be advantageous.
One exemplary embodiment of the invention converts the optical illumination intensity signal to an analogue electrical signal with a linear relationship. This embodiment is advantageous at low light illumination levels which integrate the charge on a photodiode mode and use commercial standard cells optimised for image capture applications.
A further exemplary embodiment of the invention converts the optical illumination intensity signal to an analogue electrical signal with a logarithmic relationship. This embodiment is advantageous with a high dynamic range of optical illumination signals as the output analogue signal does not saturate over a wide range of illumination intensities.
A further exemplary embodiment of the invention uses a combination of conversion using linear and logarithmic functions, or similar non-linear function combinations as a response curve. This embodiment is advantageous to enable both good low light illumination performance and a high dynamic range. A first embodiment uses a fixed configuration with a combined function.
A further exemplary embodiment allows a configuration so that the response curve is changed during operation for the full arrangement of pixels. This is preferably carried out dependent on the global illumination conditions or operating mode of the image sensor application.
A further embodiment allows a configuration so that the response curve is changed during operation independently for subsets of pixels. This is preferably carried out dependent on the local illumination conditions or focus of attention of the image sensor application.
In one exemplary embodiment, according to
In a derived embodiment, the analogue swept signal is a linear ramp; in a further embodiment the analogue swept signal is a non-linear ramp, e.g. an exponential ramp.
As the swept signal may be generated centrally, the implementation of a non-linear ramp is advantageous as the additional complexity for this circuit is only required once on the device, providing (i) an area saving and (ii) matched function for all pixels.
In particular the modification of the ramp may be used to compensate for non-idealities in the sensor circuit (11), or for variation over temperature or other environmental conditions.
In particular, the modification may be carried out by analogue or digital means.
In particular, the modification may be carried out with reference to test cells on the device. This implementation is advantageous as the compensation of non-idealities reflected in the test cells is automatic.
In one exemplary embodiment, the same analogue swept ramp is provided simultaneously to the entire pixel arrangement. In a derived embodiment, different analogue swept ramps are applied to subsets of the arrangement.
The use of different ramps is advantageous where the characteristics of the sensor circuits (11) vary across the pixel arrangement (deliberate cell variation or due to process or optical configuration) and this variation is compensated with the provision of different ramps.
In a further embodiment the analogue swept ramp is modified according to the operating mode of the image sensor from time to time during operation.
In one exemplary embodiment, a changing digital code is provided simultaneously with the analogue ramp. The digital code stored in the digital storage circuit (13) is the value of the digital code when the comparator output toggles. In a first embodiment, the code is a binary code.
In a derived embodiment the digital code is a gray code. A gray code is advantageous as (i) synchronisation with the digital storage is not required as only one edge changes at a time and the codes either side of the edge are valid and (ii) the gray code has fewer edges over a cycle and the power consumption is reduced.
In a derived embodiment the analogue and digital code sweeps are separated sequentially into storage and comparison sweeps, or multiple comparison sweeps. The relationship between the analogue signal level and the digital code is varied between the reference and comparison sweeps. This approach is advantageous as a simpler digital comparison logic is required in the pixel. This might reduce the required area.
In a derived embodiment, a different relationship between the analogue swept level and the digital code is created for different subsets of pixels.
This approach is advantageous as a digital code can be varied in either (i) calculation or in (ii) timing with a digital circuit. This provides an area saving over the generation of multiple analogue ramps and improved flexibility and enables the compensation or change of function of sub-sets of the arrangement of pixels.
In one exemplary embodiment, the digital comparison between the stored level and the current level is carried out continuously during the analogue sweep. The comparison result is related to the timing of the toggling of the analogue comparator output and the digital comparison. In this embodiment the implementation of hysteresis, or differing event generation thresholds, is carried out based on the relative timing.
In one exemplary embodiment the variation in timing is generated based on a clock. In a further exemplary embodiment, the variation is generated with a timer circuit within the pixel circuit.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the digital comparison between the stored level and the current level is carried out following the analogue voltage sweep. This embodiment is advantageous where the logic can use sequential, e.g. bitwise, elements repeatedly providing a silicon area saving.
In one exemplary embodiment the sequential logic is performed with static logic.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the sequential logic is performed with dynamic logic. In a derived embodiment the digital comparison is carried out with feedback from the previous result. This is typically used to implement hysteresis in the comparison and is advantageous in the suppression of noise and reduction of spurious events.
In a derived embodiment the digital comparison and event generation is carried out requiring a different difference (>1) in order to generate an event. This may be advantageous to (i) reduce the number of events, or to (ii) improve the resolution of the production of events.
The required difference may be dependent on (i) the signal level (ii) the operation mode, e.g. region of interest (iii) the adjacent pixels levels (iv) the pixel previous levels (v) the pixel previous events (vi) the events of adjacent pixels.
In a derived embodiment a rate of event generation below a certain rate is suppressed within the pixel circuit. This is advantageous as this information is less useful for subsequent image processing and the event suppression reduces the power and processing requirement.
In one exemplary embodiment, the digital condition for event generation is dependent on the event generation of adjacent pixel circuits. This operation enables, for example, filtering of the events to reduce the number of spurious events.
In one exemplary embodiment, the digital condition for event generation is dependent on the stored levels of adjacent pixel circuits. This operation enables, for example, filtering of the events to provide increased sensitivity near to an edge.
In one exemplary embodiment, the digital condition for event generation is dependent on multiple stored levels of the pixel circuit. This operation enables, for example, filtering of analogue noise to reduce the number of spurious events.
In one exemplary embodiment, the sample rate is chosen to synchronise with the flicker frequency of a disturbing light source. This is advantageous as it allows the suppression of events due to this light source.
In one exemplary embodiment, the event output is a single event bit, e.g. up event, no event. In other words, the up event corresponds to an increased light intensity.
In a further embodiment, the event output is a two bit, e.g. up and down. In other words, the event output may indicate whether the light intensity or sensor signal VSIG is bigger or smaller than the stored light intensity level or stored VSIG.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the event output includes the digital representation of the magnitude of the change. This embodiment is advantageous as it enables the perfect reconstruction of the image from the event information.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the event output includes the illumination intensity representation before and/or after the change. In one embodiment it is additionally possible to read out the level of the stored values in the pixel array.
In a derived embodiment the digital stored values from a target area selectively read, i.e. via random access.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the digital level is read over the existing common event output lines. In one embodiment the stored digital levels can be written into the arrangement of pixels to provide a new or intentionally modified reference for comparison. In a derived embodiment, a stream of data is written into the stored digital levels to intentionally provide a time dependent reference for event generation.
In related derived embodiment, the stream of data is an event stream similar to that normally generated by the sensor.
In one embodiment the sensor circuit (11) has a feedback from the stored digital level, or the stored digital level of the adjacent pixels, to adjust the VSIG level of that pixel. This embodiment may be advantageous to realise, e.g. a hysteresis function, in a minimal surface area.
With reference to
The digital storage and local digital calculation of events of the current invention provides the basis for a digital control (modulation) of the analogue function of the read-out circuits.
In particular, a representative switch (typically MOS) in the example analogue pixel circuit, shows an example of switching a current generated by local transistor Q under global control of signal vg, wherein
That is, in an embodiment, the digital switch local control may be provided by the digital storage circuit as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the digital switch local control may be provided by the digital comparison circuit as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the digital switch local control may be provided by the digital event generation circuit as illustrated in
In one exemplary embodiment the comparator circuit has a feedback from the stored digital level, or the stored digital level of the adjacent pixels, to adjust the function of the comparator, typically to add an offset. This embodiment may be advantageous to realise, e.g. a hysteresis function, in a minimal surface area.
In one exemplary embodiment the sample rate is electrically configurable or electrically changed from time to time in operation.
The power consumption and event generation rate may be dependent on the sample rate.
Reducing the sample rate enables a very low power mode under quiet conditions. Additionally, a low sample rate in combination with integrating sensor circuit (11) behaviour enables operation in low light conditions.
In one exemplary embodiment the sampling is entirely interrupted for an extended period.
The power consumption and event generation rate may be dependent on the sample rate. Interrupting the sampling for a period, e.g. 1 s, enables very low power operation, but due to the digital storage retains the fidelity of the recorded image.
In one exemplary embodiment, the analogue signal levels (VSIG) can be read out of the pixel arrangement. This embodiment may be realised using the common event column lines.
In one exemplary embodiment the image sensor is constructed of multiple semiconductor layers, where the semiconductor process type of each level is optimised for the function of that layer. This implementation is advantageous as the optimisation for function of the semiconductor processes allows (i) improvements in performance, (ii) reduction of silicon area and following (ii) a) device size and (ii) b) device cost. The altered physical structure improves the optical performance for (i) fill factor (ii) quantum efficiency and reduces electrical disturbance between controlling signal lines and the photosensor circuit.
The plurality of pixels is typically organised in a two dimensional grid with “rows” and “columns”. It should be noted that the definition of “rows” and “columns” can be interchanged without affecting the invention. It should also be noted that other geometrical configurations are possible which map to a two dimensional grid, without impacting the applicability of the invention.
Finally, it should be noted that the term “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps and the “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. Also, elements described in association with different embodiments may be combined. It should also be noted that reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20182536 | Jun 2020 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/067341 | 6/24/2021 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2021/260106 | 12/30/2021 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6635857 | Kindt | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 7679542 | Ham et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7728269 | Lichtsteiner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 8355068 | Kondo | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 9521337 | Shen | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9838635 | Gousev et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9961291 | Chen | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10218922 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10419701 | Liu | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10721423 | Finateu et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 11202041 | Kindo | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11736830 | Sasaki | Aug 2023 | B2 |
| 11950009 | Zhu | Apr 2024 | B2 |
| 20090109311 | Mabuchi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20100182468 | Posch | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110169990 | Higuchi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110291019 | Yuan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120139887 | Hsu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120293698 | Sukegawa | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130223759 | Nishiyama | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140009650 | Kim | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20150035949 | Rouh et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150194454 | Kim | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150358570 | Taniguchi | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160093273 | Wang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160094787 | Govil | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160094800 | Gousev et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160227135 | Matolin | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160285444 | Denham | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170033777 | Kim | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20180058926 | Suh | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180191972 | Berner et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180191982 | Berner et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180262705 | Park | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20190051680 | Hanzawa et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190052821 | Berner | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190141265 | Finateu | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190260384 | Liobe et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190285468 | Berkovich et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190289230 | Berner | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190340452 | Asayama et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200014418 | Yu et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200029033 | Xu | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200068149 | Finateu et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200084403 | Suh et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200260039 | Niwa | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200358977 | Niwa | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210067100 | Choi | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210067679 | Tornes | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210074745 | Mi | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210091129 | Kim | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210152757 | Wakabayashi | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210152762 | Sakakibara | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210235036 | Kitano | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210258519 | Niwa | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210344867 | Gao | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20220224856 | Brändli et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220239851 | Brändli et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220264035 | Berner | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| 20220303490 | Chen | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20230179219 | Tantawy | Jun 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1941857 | Apr 2007 | CN |
| 101990070 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 106716443 | May 2017 | CN |
| 110169050 | Aug 2019 | CN |
| 110999278 | Apr 2020 | CN |
| 2933995 | Oct 2015 | EP |
| 3267678 | Jan 2018 | EP |
| 3313064 | Apr 2018 | EP |
| 3955566 | Feb 2022 | EP |
| 2976918 | Dec 2012 | FR |
| 8-122149 | May 1996 | JP |
| 2009508085 | Dec 2006 | JP |
| 2009111666 | May 2009 | JP |
| 2010-510732 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2012015923 | Jan 2012 | JP |
| 2015-501936 | Jan 2015 | JP |
| 2015170863 | Sep 2015 | JP |
| 2016-533140 | Oct 2016 | JP |
| 2017046259 | Mar 2017 | JP |
| 2018501675 | Jan 2018 | JP |
| 2018067776 | Apr 2018 | JP |
| 2019536389 | Dec 2019 | JP |
| 2020016654 | Jan 2020 | JP |
| 2020507974 | Mar 2020 | JP |
| 20200029328 | Mar 2020 | KR |
| 2014174498 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2015036592 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2017009944 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| 2017150240 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| 2017158483 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| 2017174579 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| 2018122800 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| 2020080383 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| 2020110537 | Jun 2020 | WO |
| 2020229980 | Nov 2020 | WO |
| 20200229981 | Nov 2020 | WO |
| 2021017766 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Tobi Delbruck “Frame-Free Dynamic Digital Vision” Proceedings of the International Conf. on Secure-Life Electronics, Advanced Electroncis for Quality Life and Society, Mar. 7, 2008, pp. 21-26. |
| Yu M. Chi, Student Member, IEEE, Udayan Mallik, Matthew A. Clapp, Edward Choi, Gert Cauwenberghs, Senior Member, IEEE, and Ralph Etienne-Cummings, Member, IEEE; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 10, Oct. 2007; CMOS Camera With In-Pixel Temporal Change Detection and ADC. |
| N. Tu et al., “CMOS active pixel sensor with combined linear and logarithmic mode operation”, Proc. IEEE Canadian Conf. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1998, pp. 754-757. |
| J. Guo et al., 2008, Sensors, 2008 IEEE. |
| Lichtsteiner et al., 2008, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 2, Feb. 2008. |
| Chou et. al., 2012, Sensors, 2012 IEEE. |
| S.D. Freedman, 2015, 2nd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI). |
| M. Goto et al., 2016, 2016 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference. |
| Background Subtraction: Theory and Practice, Ahmed Elgammal, ISBN 1627054405; Copyright 2015. |
| Christian Reckleben, Karsten Hansen, Senior Member, IEEE, Pradeep Kalavakuru, Janusz Szymanski, Florian Erdinger, Peter Fischer, Manfred Kirchgessner, and Jan Soldat; A 64-by-64 Pixel-ADC Matrix; 2015 IEEE. |
| Suarez et al. 2010; In-Pixel ADC for a Vision Architecture on CMOS-3D Technology. |
| Biyin et al., “An In-Pixel Gain Amplifier Based Event-Driven Physical Unclonalbe Function for CMOS Dynamic” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), IEEE, May 26, 2019, pp. 1-5. |
| Itoh et. al, “4-Layer 3-D IC with a function of parallel signal processing”, Microelectronic engineering, vol. 15, No. 1-4, 1991, pp. 187-190. |
| Christian Brandli, StudentMember, IEEE, Raphael Berner, Member, IEEE, MinhaoYang, Student Member, IEEE, Shih-Chii Liu, Senior Member, IEEE, and Tobi Delbruck, Fellow, IEEE; A 240×180 130 dB 3 μs Latency Global Shutter Spatiotemporal Vision Sensor; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 49, No. 10, Oct. 2014. |
| Gallego et al.: “Event-based Vision: A Survey”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020, arXiv:1904.08405v3. |
| Pending claims from U.S. Appl. No. 17/606,251—Preliminary Amendment; Pending as of Mar. 20, 2023. |
| Pending claims from U.S. Appl. No. 18/002,780—Preliminary Amendment; Pending as of Mar. 20, 2023. |
| Pending claims from U.S. Appl. No. 18/002,798—Preliminary Amendment; Pending as of Mar. 20, 2023. |
| Pending claims from U.S. Appl. No. 18/002,876—Preliminary Amendment; Pending as of Mar. 20, 2023. |
| Pending claims from U.S. Appl. No. 18/002,792—Preliminary Amendment; Pending as of Mar. 20, 2023. |
| Delbruck “Self-biasing low power adaptive photosensors”, 20044 IEEE Symposium, May 23-26, 2004, pp. 844-847. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230217134 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
