Phase-shift keying (PSK) is a digital modulation scheme that conveys data by changing, or modulating, the phase of a reference signal (the carrier wave). Any digital modulation scheme uses a finite number of distinct signals to represent digital data. PSK uses a finite number of phases. The demodulator, which is designed specifically for the symbol-set used by the modulator, determines the phase of the received signal and maps it back to the symbol it represents, thus recovering the original data. This requires the receiver to be able to compare the phase of the received signal to a reference signal-such a system is termed coherent.
Alternatively, instead of using the bit patterns to set the phase of the wave, the bit patterns can instead be used to change the phase of the wave by a specified amount. The demodulator then determines the changes in the phase of the received signal rather than the phase itself. Since this scheme depends on the difference between successive phases, it is termed differential phase-shift keying (DPSK). DPSK can be significantly simpler to implement than ordinary PSK since there is no need for the demodulator to estimate the reference signal to determine the exact phase of the received signal (it is a non-coherent scheme). In exchange, it sometimes produces more erroneous demodulations. The exact requirements of the particular scenario under consideration determine which scheme is used.
Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying (GFSK) is a type of Frequency Shift Keying modulation that utilizes a Gaussian filter to smooth positive/negative frequency deviations, which represent a binary 1 or 0. GFSK and DPSK are used in Bluetooth radios. GFSK is also used in the cordless Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) phone standard and the cellular Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) standard, along with the GSM enhancements for High Speed Circuit Switched Data (HSCSD) and Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE). GFSK is also used by Cypress Wireless USB, Nordic Semiconductor, and z-wave devices.
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools, and methods that are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
Gaussian frequency shift keying (GFSK) modulation is a modulation whereby the information bits are embedded in the frequency or phase of the transmitted signal, which makes the signal less susceptible to amplitude nonlinearities introduced by the channel and/or receiver hardware. GFSK is typically implemented as a form of frequency modulation (FM), in which case it is a modulation format with memory. GFSK is typically demodulated incoherently to reduce receiver complexity, but this can result in a 2-3 dB degradation in performance relative to a coherent demodulation where the phase and frequency of the signal is tracked. A technique for low-complexity high-performance coherent demodulation of GFSK signals involves utilizing a novel phase and frequency tracking mechanism coupled with a trellis search technique to track signal memory in the demodulation process.
A method according to the technique may include modeling modulation based upon a trellis. The method may further include estimating unknown parameters, selecting a maximum likelihood path through the trellis, and mapping the maximum likelihood path to an output bit sequence.
Embodiments of the inventions are illustrated in the figures. However, the embodiments and figures are illustrative rather than limiting; they provide examples of the inventions.
In the following description, several specific details are presented to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or in combination with other components, etc. In other instances, well-known implementations or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of various embodiments of the invention.
In GFSK, past bit transmissions are embedded in the signal phase associated with the current bit period T. Specifically, the transmitted signal at time t has constant amplitude and a phase equal to θ(t,a)=2πƒct+φ(t,a), where ƒc is the carrier frequency and φ(t,a) is the information carrying phase given by
for h the modulation index, a[i]ε{+1,−1} the polar representation of the binary data bits, L the length of the signal memory, T the bit period, and q(t) the phase response. The memory in the information carrying phase is of length L−1, since at time t the phase depends on the current data bit as well as the previous L−1 data bits. The phase response is the integral of the frequency response g(t), i.e.
where g(t)=u(t)*hg(t) is the convolution of a rectangular pulse u(t) and a Gaussian pulse hg(t).
If the signal is down converted using a frequency
then the complex baseband received signal becomes r(t)=s(t)ejφ(t)+n(t)=ejψ(t,b)ejφ(t)+n(t), where s(t) is the complex baseband transmitted signal, n(t) is the complex baseband noise of the received signal, ψ(t,b) is the demodulated phase of the signal given by
the binary representation of the data, and φ(t)=φ0+2πΔƒt is the time-varying phase offset of the received signal, which depends on a fixed phase offset φ0 and a frequency offset Δƒ, and is thus independent of the data.
The complex baseband transmitted signal can be written as
A technique for detecting transmitted data with low complexity involves estimating unknown parameters and then using them in a trellis search to estimate the transmitted data. The trellis may or may not be a reduced state trellis.
In the example of
A modulation index may or may not need to be approximated. For example, the modulation index could be either explicit, approximated, or obviated. In an illustrative embodiment, a state trellis search is based on some approximations that allow a simple characterization, and hence detection, of the transmitted signal. For example, where k and p are relative primes a modulation index h=k/p can be approximated. Advantageously, as described later, restricting the modulation index to these values allows coherent maximum-likelihood demodulation through a recursive updating of just a few parameters. As an example of a way to simplify the expression for the signal phase, q(2T)=0.5 can also be approximated. With these approximations ρm
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
Note that ρ[mi] can be rewritten as
for vi=[vi[1],vi[2],vi[3]]=[d[i−2],b[i−1],b[i]]. Thus, we can express ρ[mi] in terms of the ith data bit and the state of the trellis shown in
In the example of
where ρ*[{tilde over (m)}i] denotes the complex conjugate of ρ[{tilde over (m)}i].
It should be noted that, in an illustrative embodiment, metrics are computed at each stage, but the bit decisions can be made at each stage, or the decision can be delayed until all of the computations, at each stage, have been made. Waiting until the end to maximize the metric and output the corresponding bits introduces delay, but can result in a more optimal path, which tends to improve performance. Performing the maximization at each time i and outputting the bits associated with the trellis path with the maximum metric at time i, on the other hand, has the advantage of reduced delay and lower memory requirements.
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
for c=μx[i−1] and
Note that dμ
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In an alternate technique, you could trace back some random number K of stages in the trellis until the 2 bit values corresponding to both surviving paths in the trellis at time i are the same. This results in a random delay in the bit outputs.
As stated earlier, the phase is slightly different over the first and last bit times since the phase over the first bit time does not have memory associated with the previous bit, and the phase over the last bit time does not have memory associated with a subsequent bit. We denote the phases corresponding to these first and last bit periods as ωs(τ,b[0]) and ωe(τ,b[L−1]), respectively. We similar define
so that we can express the metrics for the first trellis stage as
where e−j{circumflex over (φ)}
After updating Λy[L−1] for yε{0,1} according to above, the tail of the signal need to be added using ze(y) as
The decisions on the last information bit is {tilde over (b)}[L−1]=x if Λx[L−1]>Λy[L−1] and the remaining bit decisions are made according to {tilde over (b)}[i]=μ{tilde over (b)}[i+1][i+1] for i=0,1, 2, . . . , L−2.
There are several techniques that can be used to obtain the time-varying phase estimate {circumflex over (φ)}(t)={circumflex over (φ)}0+2π{circumflex over (Δ)}ƒt, including estimation algorithms applied to training sequences or preambles in the data prior to demodulation, data-driven estimation that is updated at each symbol time, or other techniques. Since the branch metric calculation described above can be updated based on the previous values of Λy[i], dy[i], μy[i], a low complexity algorithm would have the property that the phase estimation algorithm can be updated based only on the values from the previous stage of the branch metric calculation, i.e. if {circumflex over (φ)}0[i] denotes the phase offset estimate at time i, it is desirable from a low-complexity perspective that this estimate depend only on {circumflex over (φ)}0[i−1], and similarly the frequency offset estimate at time i, {circumflex over (Δ)}ƒ[i] should depend only on {circumflex over (Δ)}ƒ[i−1].
In an illustrative embodiment, a transmitted phase can be expressed as a function of the accumulated bits and the last two bits as φ(τ+(n−1)T,a)=πhd[n−2]+2πhω(τ,a[n−1],a[n]), where d[n−2] and ω(τ,a[n−1],a[n]) are redefined as
where again a[i]ε{+1,−1} is the polar representation of the binary data. Then ρ[mi]=ejπhd[i−2]z(a[i−1],a[i]).
Let us denote the phase estimate at time i by q[i]. We can obtain this estimate based on averaging over the current and last sample as
ej{circumflex over (φ)}
where p[i]=βp[i−1]+(1−β)r[i]ρ*[{tilde over (m)}i]ρ[{tilde over (m)}i−1]r*[i−1], and 0≦β≦1 is the forgetting factor. The branch metric for trellis section i in (6) can now be approximated by λ[i]=Re{r[i]ρ*[{tilde over (m)}i]q*[i−1]}, where q[i] is the combined phase and frequency offset estimate according to
Define also δy[i]=hdy[i−1] and u[i]=r[i]ρ*[{tilde over (m)}i]=r[i]e−jπδ[i−1]z*(a[i−1],a[i]). These calculations require multiplications of complex numbers, which can be simplified to additions of real numbers as follows. Let
However, some further modifications are needed for the updates of the phase and frequency offset estimation q[i]. Consider two complex-valued numbers with unit amplitude, e−jπa and e−jπb for −1≦a≦+1 and −1≦b≦+1. The weighted sum of these numbers can then be approximated according to γejπa+(1−γ)ejπb≈ejπ(a+(1−y)[b−a]
The updates of Λ[i], δ[i], μ[i], ū[i],
Note that the above parameters only depend on their previous values, i.e., a buffer of size two for each parameter is enough. Only μy[i] needs to be saved for all yε{0,1} and i=1, 2, . . . , L−1 to be able to track the surviving path through the entire trellis, but on the other hand, μy[i] only contains 1 bit. The normalization of the metric Λy[i] is just to keep it from overflowing. The length of the trace back K to make decisions on the data bits can also be made longer than one symbol which may lead to some performance benefit.
In DPSK (also referred to as D-MPSK) the transmitted complex symbols are given by s[i]=s[i−1]ejπφ[i] where φ[i]εS is the data phase carrying the m=log2(M) information bits
In an illustrative embodiment, the information bits are mapped to the phases using Gray mapping. The first symbol s[0]=ejπφ[0] is transmitted with an arbitrary phase φ[0]ε[−1,+1). The transmitted symbols can also be written as s[i]=ejπ(Φ[i]+φ[0])=ejπΦ[i]ejπφ[0], where Φ[i]εS denotes the coherent data phases with
Note that φ[i]=Φ[i]−Φ[i−1], for i=1, 2, . . . , L. The transmitted baseband analog signal is given by
where h(t) is the transmit pulse shaping and T is the data symbol duration. The received base band signal is
where τ is the unknown propagation delay, Δ is the unknown frequency offset, θ=φ[0]−2Δτ is the unknown phase offset, and n(t) is the additive white Gaussian noise with two sided power spectral density
DPSK modulation can be modeled by a trellis with M states y=0, 1, . . . , M−1, where the reference symbol going into state y is
There may or may not be unknown parameters associated with, for example, the signal. The DPSK signal can be demodulated by finding the maximum likelihood path through the trellis associated with the received signal, as has been described previously for GFSK (e.g., with reference
In an illustrative embodiment, the transmit pulse can be truncated by using a window w(t) that is non-zero except N symbol intervals centered around zero
Using {tilde over (h)}(t) as the transmit pulse, the received signal becomes
This signal is averaged over the ith bit period to obtain
Assuming perfect timing, the demodulation can be performed by a trellis search on a fully connected trellis with M states for the symbol z[i] that maximizes the maximum likelihood metric Λ[L−1] for L−1 symbols given by
Using the same notation as for GFSK, described previously, define
The updates of Λ[i], μ[i], ū[i],
K≦0 is the trace back length that will also affect the delay of the decision. To even further reduce the complexity the starting state x can be put to the winning ending state from the previous trellis section, i.e.,
That will reduce the innermost for-loop with a factor of M.
As used herein, the term “embodiment” means an embodiment that serves to illustrate by way of example but not limitation.
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art that the preceding examples and embodiments are exemplary and not limiting to the scope of the present invention. It is intended that all permutations, enhancements, equivalents, and improvements thereto that are apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings are included within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims include all such modifications, permutations and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/797,956, entitled Multimedia Cell Platform, filed May 4, 2006, and to U.S. Provisional Application 60/810,036, entitled Time Multiplexing Antenna Diversity System, filed May 31, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5268695 | Dentinger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5729558 | Mobin | Mar 1998 | A |
6035007 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6081700 | Salvi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6351499 | Paulraj et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6470047 | Kleinerman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477208 | Huff | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477213 | Miyoshi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484285 | Dent | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6642904 | Yokoshima et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6807404 | Meijer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6871052 | Spencer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6967598 | Mills | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7035343 | Chi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058422 | Learned et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076263 | Medvedev et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7194237 | Sugar et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224743 | Holmes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7298798 | Chao et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7321636 | Harel et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7400872 | Kogure | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415079 | Cameron et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450657 | Paulraj et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7533327 | Heiman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7564931 | Venkataramani et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7623836 | Finkelstein | Nov 2009 | B1 |
20020163879 | Li et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003863 | Thielecke et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030081701 | Pick et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087673 | Walton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030141938 | Poklemba et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157954 | Medvedev et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185309 | Pautler et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040013209 | Zehavi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040153679 | Fitton et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040234012 | Rooyen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240486 | Venkatesh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053172 | Heikkila | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085269 | Buljore et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099937 | Oh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113041 | Polley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130694 | Medvedev et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050170839 | Rinne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192019 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195784 | Freedman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220057 | Monsen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245201 | Ella et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265470 | Kishigami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276361 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060034217 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034221 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060083290 | Shin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094385 | Rafati | May 2006 | A1 |
20060223487 | Alam et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060270427 | Shida et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276227 | Dravida | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070136446 | Rezvani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153924 | Ling et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070202818 | Okamoto | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230638 | Griniasty | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258534 | Schmidt | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080139123 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159123 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100091891 | Calando et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2007021159 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130578 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070268980 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60797956 | May 2006 | US | |
60810036 | May 2006 | US |